1
|
Buta F, Paoletti G, Bragato MC, Giovannini M, Canonica GW, Heffler E. Real-world evidence of allergen immunotherapy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2024:00130832-990000000-00151. [PMID: 39212626 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000001026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The full understanding of the long-term effectiveness and safety of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) for allergic respiratory diseases cannot be achieved through randomized controlled trials (RCTs) alone. However, real-world studies designed as registries can complement RCTs. RECENT FINDINGS The significance of registries is highlighted by their potential to reassess contraindications and collect data on adult and pediatric patients with multiple comorbidities who are often excluded from RCTs. SUMMARY AIT is the sole disease-modifying therapeutic approach capable of inducing tolerance and offering a long-term response to allergens. AIT has been shown to play a role in arresting the 'allergic march' in young people, which reduces the risk of developing asthmatic clinical manifestations. Although RCTs are considered the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of AIT, their duration is usually too short (seldom lasting more than 1 year) to assess the long-term effects of AIT. Several long-term studies show that AIT's effect depends strongly on its use duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Buta
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School and Operative Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Messina, Messina
| | - Giovanni Paoletti
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele
| | - Maria Chiara Bragato
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costanzo G, Caruso C, Paoletti G, Baglivo I, Colantuono S, Bagnasco D, Caminati M, Giovannini M, Castagnoli R, Senna G, Sirena C, Tosca MA, Passalacqua G, Marseglia GL, Miraglia del Giudice M, Ciprandi G, Indolfi C, Barberi S, Landi M, Di Gioacchino M, Canonica GW, Heffler E. RIAIT (Italian Registry of Allergen Immunotherapy): Protocol for a New Tool in a New Vision of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Allergists. J Pers Med 2024; 14:854. [PMID: 39202045 PMCID: PMC11355798 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated responses to clinical parameters, but a significant proportion of allergy patients in real-life settings would have been excluded from such studies. Therefore, real-world research is needed, and there is a growing body of information on allergen immunotherapy's long-term effectiveness and safety. Real-world evidence can be a valuable instrument to better understand the patient's journey and the effectiveness and safety of therapies. For this purpose, a registry will be used for the first time in Italy to evaluate the impact of allergen immunotherapy on several outcomes, including quality of life and disease-related effects in the pediatric and adult allergic population with a socio-economic assessment and respect to real-world health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Costanzo
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.C.); (G.P.); (G.W.C.)
| | - Cristiano Caruso
- UOSD Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paoletti
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.C.); (G.P.); (G.W.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Ilaria Baglivo
- UOC Digestive Disease Center CEMAD, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Stefania Colantuono
- UOSD DH Internal Medicine and Digestive Disease, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Diego Bagnasco
- UO Clinica Malattie Respiratorie e Allergologia, IRCCS-AOU San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (D.B.); (G.P.)
- Dipartimento di medicina interna (DIMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Caminati
- Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona Integrated University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (M.C.); (G.S.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy;
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Castagnoli
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (R.C.); (G.L.M.)
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona Integrated University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy; (M.C.); (G.S.)
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy
| | - Concetta Sirena
- Registro Italiano Allergen Immunotherapy (RIAIT), Via San Gregorio 12, 20124 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- UO Clinica Malattie Respiratorie e Allergologia, IRCCS-AOU San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (D.B.); (G.P.)
- Dipartimento di medicina interna (DIMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi Marseglia
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (R.C.); (G.L.M.)
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Michele Miraglia del Giudice
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.d.G.); (C.I.)
| | - Giorgio Ciprandi
- Allergy Clinic, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, 16145 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Cristiana Indolfi
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.M.d.G.); (C.I.)
| | | | - Massimo Landi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Mario Di Gioacchino
- Institute for Clinical Immunotherapy and Advanced Biology Treatments, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.C.); (G.P.); (G.W.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.C.); (G.P.); (G.W.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Müllerová H, Chan JSK, Heatley H, Carter V, Townend J, Skinner D, Franzén S, Marshall J, Price D. Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol for the Management of COPD in a UK Primary Care Population: Real-World Use and Early Medication Success. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19:1153-1166. [PMID: 38813078 PMCID: PMC11134059 DOI: 10.2147/copd.s452624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Real-life research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol (BGF) in routine COPD primary care management. We assessed the frequency of medication success among patients with COPD who initiated BGF using real-world data. Patients and Methods Patients with a recorded diagnostic COPD code who started BGF with ≥2 prescriptions within 90-days were identified in the UK Optimum Patient Care Research Database and followed from first prescription until censoring at the end of follow-up (180-days), death, leaving database or end of data at 24/10/2022. The primary outcome was medication success at 90-days post-BGF initiation, defined as no major cardiac or respiratory event (ie no complicated COPD exacerbation, hospitalization for any respiratory event, myocardial infarction, new/hospitalized heart failure, and death) and no incidence of pneumonia. Medication success was also assessed at 180-days post-BGF initiation. Overall real-life medication success was claimed if the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) for the proportion of patients meeting the primary outcome was ≥70% (defined a priori). Results Two hundred eighty-five patients were included. Prior to BGF initiation, these patients often had severe airflow obstruction (mean ppFEV1: 54.5%), were highly symptomatic (mMRC ≥2: 77.9% (n = 205/263); mean CAT score: 21.7 (SD 7.8)), with evidence of short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) over-use (≥3 inhalers/year: 62.1%, n=179/285), repeat OCS prescriptions (≥2 courses/year: 33.0%, n = 95/285) and multiple primary care consultations (≥2 visits/year: 61.1%, n = 174/285). Overall, 39.6% of patients (n = 113/285) switched from previous triple therapies. Real-life medication success was achieved by 96.5% of patients (n = 275/285 [95% CI: 93.6, 98.3]) during 90-days treatment with BGF and by 91.8% (n = 169/184 [95% CI: 86.9, 95.4]) of patients at 180-days. The prescribed daily dose of SABA remained stable over the study period. Conclusion The majority of patients initiating BGF experienced real-life medication success reflecting the absence of severe cardiopulmonary events. These benefits were apparent after 90-days of treatment and sustained over 180-days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana Müllerová
- Medical Evidence Strategy, Biopharmaceuticals R&I Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Heath Heatley
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Victoria Carter
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - John Townend
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Derek Skinner
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stefan Franzén
- BPM Evidence Statistics, Biopharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Marshall
- Global Medical Affairs, Biopharmaceuticals R&I Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yorgancıoğlu A, Cruz AA, Garcia G, Lavoie KL, Roche N, P G A, Verma M, Majumdar A, Chatterjee S. A network meta-analysis of the association between patient traits and response to regular dosing with ICS/long-acting β 2-agonist plus short-acting β 2 agonist reliever or maintenance and reliever therapy for asthma. Respir Med 2023; 218:107377. [PMID: 37524150 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current treatment for moderate-severe asthma with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based therapy can follow two strategies: a single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) regimen, or regular dosing with ICS/long-acting β2-agonist used as maintenance therapy plus a separate short acting β2-agonist reliever inhaler. It would be clinically useful to understand the potential of patient traits to influence regular dosing or MART treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis was conducted to identify specific patient traits that may predict improved clinical outcomes with regular dosing or MART. RESULTS The SLR identified 28 studies in patients with moderate-severe asthma assessing regular dosing or MART treatments and reporting the traits and outcomes of interest. Network meta-regressions found no significant difference in the relative efficacy of regular dosing as compared with MART on any of the clinical outcomes (exacerbation rate, time to first exacerbation, FEV1, reliever use and adherence) for any of the patient traits (baseline lung function, baseline ACQ, age, BMI, and smoking history) evaluated. However, some trends towards traits influencing treatment efficacy were identified. Inconsistent reporting of traits and outcomes was observed between trials. CONCLUSIONS The analysed patient traits evaluated in this study were associated with similar efficacy for the analysed outcomes to either regular dosing or MART; however, trends from the data observed encourage future analyses for possible identification of additional traits, or a combination of traits, that may be of interest. More comparable reporting of clinically important traits and outcomes would improve future analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alvaro A Cruz
- ProAR and Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
| | | | - Kim L Lavoie
- University of Quebec at Montreal (UQAM), Montreal, Canada; Montreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, CIUSSS-NIM, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Pneumology, AP-HP Centre Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Abhijith P G
- GSK, Global Medical Affairs, Global Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manish Verma
- GSK, Global Medical Affairs, General Medicine, Mumbai, India.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dreyer NA, Mack CD. Tactical Considerations for Designing Real-World Studies: Fit-for-Purpose Designs That Bridge Research and Practice. Pragmat Obs Res 2023; 14:101-110. [PMID: 37786592 PMCID: PMC10541678 DOI: 10.2147/por.s396024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Real-world evidence (RWE) is being used to provide information on diverse groups of patients who may be highly impacted by disease but are not typically studied in traditional randomized clinical trials (RCT) and to obtain insights from everyday care settings and real-world adherence to inform clinical practice. RWE is derived from so-called real-world data (RWD), ie, information generated by clinicians in the course of everyday patient care, and is sometimes coupled with systematic input from patients in the form of patient-reported outcomes or from wearable biosensors. Studies using RWD are conducted to evaluate how well medical interventions, services, and diagnostics perform under conditions of real-world use, and may include long-term follow-up. Here, we describe the main types of studies used to generate RWE and offer pointers for clinicians interested in study design and execution. Our tactical guidance addresses (1) opportunistic study designs, (2) considerations about representativeness of study participants, (3) expectations for transparency about data provenance, handling and quality assessments, and (4) considerations for strengthening studies using record linkage and/or randomization in pragmatic clinical trials. We also discuss likely sources of bias and suggest mitigation strategies. We see a future where clinical records - patient-generated data and other RWD - are brought together and harnessed by robust study design with efficient data capture and strong data curation. Traditional RCT will remain the mainstay of drug development, but RWE will play a growing role in clinical, regulatory, and payer decision-making. The most meaningful RWE will come from collaboration with astute clinicians with deep practice experience and questioning minds working closely with patients and researchers experienced in the development of RWE.
Collapse
|
6
|
Real-Life Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Immune Therapy with Carbamylated Monomeric Allergoids on Mite, Grass, and Pellitory Respiratory Allergy: A Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247384. [PMID: 36556000 PMCID: PMC9781390 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: real-life studies are encouraged to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). In this context, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of carbamylated monomeric allergoid subcutaneous immunotherapy (MA-SCIT), along with patient satisfaction. Methods: a total of 291 patients with rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma with inhalant (house dust mite, grass, and pellitory) allergies were enrolled in this study. Perceived efficacy and perceived satisfaction with MA-SCIT, symptom score by VAS, ARIA classification of rhinitis, drug consumption, number of asthma worsening episodes, and asthma symptom control were evaluated by questionnaires before, after one year, at the end of treatment, and after one or two years of MA-SCIT. Results: the overall symptom score significantly decreased over the years of MA-SCIT, irrespective of specific sensitization (p < 0.01). There was a substantial amelioration of rhinitis severity, with a significant reduction (p < 0.01) in drug use. A significant reduction was observed in the asthma symptom VAS score and asthma-worsening episodes requiring systemic steroids. None of the patients reported any severe adverse reactions. Finally, 90% of the patients reported full satisfaction with the treatment. Conclusions: the study showed that AIT with carbamylated monomeric allergoids of grass, pellitory, and mites was effective and well tolerated by patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fritzsching B, Contoli M, Porsbjerg C, Buchs S, Larsen JR, Freemantle N. Real-world evidence: Methods for assessing long-term health and effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 149:881-883. [PMID: 34973297 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Fritzsching
- Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergy, Children's Doctor Service, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Marco Contoli
- Respiratory Section, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Celeste Porsbjerg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Nick Freemantle
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology UCL, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Paoletti G, Di Bona D, Chu DK, Firinu D, Heffler E, Agache I, Jutel M, Klimek L, Pfaar O, Mösges R, DunnGalvin A, Genuneit J, Hoffmann HJ, Canonica GW. Allergen immunotherapy: The growing role of observational and randomized trial "Real-World Evidence". Allergy 2021; 76:2663-2672. [PMID: 33583050 DOI: 10.1111/all.14773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there is a considerable body of knowledge about allergen immunotherapy (AIT), there is a lack of data on the reliability of real-world evidence (RWE) in AIT, and consequently, a lack of information on how AIT effectively works in real life. METHODS To address the current unmet need for an appraisal of the quality of RWE in AIT, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Methodology Committee recently initiated a systematic review of observational studies of AIT, which will use the RELEVANT tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) to rate the quality of the evidence base as a whole. The next step will be to develop a broadly applicable, pragmatic "real-world" database using systematic data collection. Based on the current RWE base, and perspectives and recommendations of authorities and scientific societies, a hierarchy of RWE in AIT is proposed, which places pragmatic trials and registry data at the positions of highest level of evidence. KEY RESULTS There is a need to establish more AIT registries that collect data in a cohesive way, using standardized protocols. CONCLUSIONS This will provide an essential source of real-world data that can be easily shared, promoting evidence-based research and quality improvement in study design and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Paoletti
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy
| | - Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari – Aldo Moro Bari Italy
| | - Derek K. Chu
- Division of Immunology and Allergy Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada
- The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton Hamilton ON Canada
| | - Davide Firinu
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy
| | - Ioana Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University and “ALLMED”Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Ralph Mösges
- Faculty of Medicine Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB) University of Cologne and CRI – Clinical Research International Limited Cologne Germany
| | - Audrey DunnGalvin
- School of Applied Psychology and Department of Paediatrics & Child Health University College Cork Cork Ireland
| | - Jon Genuneit
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry Ulm University Ulm Germany
- Pediatric Epidemiology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty Leipzig University Leipzig Germany
| | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University and Department of Respiratory Diseases and AllergyAarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Bona D, Paoletti G, Chu DK, Pepys J, Macchia L, Heffler E, Canonica GW. Allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergy: Quality appraisal of observational comparative effectiveness studies using the REal Life Evidence AssessmeNt Tool. An EAACI methodology committee analysis. Clin Transl Allergy 2021; 11:e12033. [PMID: 34141180 PMCID: PMC8203181 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Observational comparative effectiveness studies in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represent an important evidence source answering research questions that can be challenging to obtain from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as long-term benefits of AIT, the effects on asthma prevention and the onset of new allergen sensitizations. However, observational studies are prone to several sources of bias, which limit their reliability.The REal Life Evidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was recently developed to assist in quality appraisal of observational comparative research to enable identification of useful nonrandomized studies to be considered within guideline development. Objective To systematically appraise the quality of published observational comparative AIT studies using RELEVANT. Methods Observational studies comparing AIT to pharmacotherapy for respiratory allergies, assessing as outcome measures reduction of symptoms and/or medication use reduction, were retrieved by computerized bibliographic searches. According to RELEVANT, a failure to meet any one of primary items (background, design, measures, analysis, results, discussion/interpretation, and conflict of interest) represents a critical flaw, significantly undermining the validity of the study results. Results The 14 studies identified supported the benefit of AIT in real-life, which persists after treatment discontinuation. However, none of them met all the 7 primary RELEVANT criteria. The main defects were reported in the design (28.6% of studies), measures and analysis (64.3% of studies), and results (78.6% of studies) items, due to selection bias and lack of methods for adjusting controls. Half of the studies did not report on conflict of interest. Conclusion There is a need for more robust observational research in AIT. RELEVANT appears as an easy-to-use and sensitive tool for quality appraisal in AIT studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari Aldo Moro Italy
| | - Giovanni Paoletti
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS Rozzano Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
| | - Derek K Chu
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods Evidence & Impact McMaster University.,The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton. Hamilton Ontario Canada
| | - Jack Pepys
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
| | - Luigi Macchia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari Aldo Moro Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS Rozzano Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS Rozzano Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pfaar O, Agache I, Bergmann K, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Bousquet J, Creticos PS, Devillier P, Durham SR, Hellings P, Kaul S, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Klimek L, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Muraro A, Papadopoulos NG, Rief W, Scadding GK, Schedlowski M, Shamji MH, Sturm G, Ree R, Vidal C, Vieths S, Wedi B, Gerth van Wijk R, Frew AJ. Placebo effects in allergen immunotherapy-An EAACI Task Force Position Paper. Allergy 2021; 76:629-647. [PMID: 32324902 DOI: 10.1111/all.14331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The placebo (Latin "I will please") effect commonly occurs in clinical trials. The psychological and physiological factors associated with patients' expectations about a treatment's positive and negative effects have yet to be well characterized, although a functional prefrontal cortex and intense bidirectional communication between the central nervous system and the immune system appear to be prerequisites for a placebo effect. The use of placebo raises certain ethical issues, especially if patients in a placebo group are denied an effective treatment for a long period of time. The placebo effect appears to be relatively large (up to 77%, relative to pretreatment scores) in controlled clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), such as the pivotal, double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) randomized clinical trials currently required by regulatory authorities worldwide. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) therefore initiated a Task Force, in order to better understand the placebo effect in AIT and its specific role in comorbidities, blinding issues, adherence, measurement time points, variability and the natural course of the disease. In this Position Paper, the EAACI Task Force highlights several important topics regarding the placebo effect in AIT such as a) regulatory aspects, b) neuroimmunological and psychological mechanisms, c) placebo effect sizes in AIT trials, d) methodological limitations in AIT trial design and e) potential solutions in future AIT trial design. In conclusion, this Position Paper aims to examine the methodological problem of placebo in AIT from different aspects and also to highlight unmet needs and possible solutions for future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health Allergy‐Centre‐Charité Berlin Germany
| | - Carsten Bindslev‐Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense Denmark
| | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
- University Hospital Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Peter S. Creticos
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
- Creticos Research Group Crownsville MD USA
| | - Philippe Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases, Exhalomics, Hôpital Foch Université Paris‐Saclay Suresnes France
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - Peter Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
| | - Susanne Kaul
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Lars Jacobsen
- ALC, Allergy Learning and Consulting Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐Med Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre Padua University Hospital Padua Padua Italy
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection Immunity & Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department 2nd Pediatric Clinic University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Philipps‐University of Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Manfred Schedlowski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology University Clinic Essen Essen Germany
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Imperial College London London UK
| | - Gunter Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Department of Allergy and Faculty of Medicine University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago Spain
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Comprehensive Allergy Center Hannover Germany
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Anthony J. Frew
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Royal Sussex County Hospital University of Sussex and University of Brighton Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Winders T, Maspero J, Callan L, Al-Ahmad M. Perspectives on decisions for treatment and care in severe asthma. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100500. [PMID: 33537114 PMCID: PMC7817505 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe asthma is a subtype of asthma that can be hard to control, resulting in an exceptional impact on an individual's quality of life. The aim of this review article is to explore the misalignment of perceptions of severe asthma among different stakeholders to identify how to reduce burden and improve delivery of care. Results The misalignment of perspectives is best reflected in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in asthma treatments, which are often designed for regulatory approval with a focus on exacerbations with no direct input from the individuals that the treatments are designed for. Based on a literature review and the clinical experience of the authors to overcome this disparity, the goals of people with severe asthma need to be incorporated throughout their care, from study design to the day-to-day management of their condition. Improved education for individuals and their support network will provide them with resources and knowledge so that they can effectively communicate their needs to other stakeholders involved in their care. Conclusion/recommendation A collaborative effort from all stakeholders is essential to ensure efficient management of asthma and a reduction in asthma burden on individuals and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya Winders
- Allergy & Asthma Network/Global Allergy & Airways Patient Platform (GAAPP), Vienna, VA, USA
| | - Jorge Maspero
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luke Callan
- Global Market Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca UK Ltd., Cambridge, UK
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
De Jong HJI, Voorham J, Scadding GK, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Smith P, Wahn U, Ryan D, Castillo JA, Carter VA, Murray RB, Price DB. Evaluating the real-life effect of MP-AzeFlu on asthma outcomes in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma in UK primary care. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100490. [PMID: 33376573 PMCID: PMC7753940 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background MP-AzeFlu (Dymista®; spray of azelastine/fluticasone propionate) is the most effective allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment available. Its effect on asthma outcomes in patients with AR and asthma is unknown. Methods This pre-post historical cohort study, using the Optimum Patient Care Research Database, included patients aged ≥12 years, from UK general practice with active asthma (defined as a recorded diagnosis, with ≥1 prescription for reliever or controller inhaler) in the year before or at the initiation date. The primary study outcome was change in number of acute respiratory events (i.e. exacerbation or antibiotic course for a respiratory event) between baseline and outcome years. The effect size of MP-AzeFlu was quantified as the difference in % of patients that improved and worsened. Results Of the 1,188 patients with AR and asthma included, many had a record of irreversible obstruction (67%), and uncontrolled asthma (70.4%), despite high mean daily doses of reliever/controller therapy and acute oral corticosteroid use, in the year pre-MP-AzeFlu initiation. MP-AzeFlu initiation was associated with fewer acute respiratory events (effect size (e) = 5.8%, p = 0.0129) and a reduction in daily use of short-acting β2-agonists, with fewer patients requiring >2 SABA puffs/week (e = 7.7% p < 0.0001). More patients had well-controlled asthma 1-year post-MP-AzeFlu initiation (e = 4.1%; p = 0.0037), despite a reduction in inhaled corticosteroids (e = 4.8%; p = 0.0078). Conclusions This study provides the first direct evidence of the beneficial effect of MP-AzeFlu on asthma outcomes in co-morbid patients in primary care in the United Kingdom. Trial registration EUPAS30940. Registered August 13, 2019.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADEPT, Anonymized data ethics & protocol transparency
- AR, Allergic rhinitis
- ATS, American Thoracic society
- BEC, Blood eosinophil count
- CRS, Chronic rhinosinusitis
- Control
- ERS, European respiratory society
- Exacerbations
- FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s
- FVC, Forced vital capacity
- GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- GINA, Global initiative for asthma
- ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid
- INS, Intranasal corticosteroid
- NP, Nasal polyps
- OAC, Overall asthma control
- OAH, Oral anti-histamine
- OCS, Oral corticosteroid
- OPCRD, Optimum patient care research database
- OTC, Over the counter
- PEF, Peak expiratory flow rate
- RCT, Randomized controlled trial
- RDAC, Risk domain asthma control
- Rescue medication
- SABA, Short-acting β2-agonist
- SMD, Standardised mean difference
- UK, United Kingdom
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaco Voorham
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Glenis K Scadding
- Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy Clinic, Humanitas University & Research Hospital, SANI-Severe Asthma Network, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Smith
- Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore.,Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.,Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Faulkner KM, MacDonald K, Abraham I, Alhossan A, Lee CS. 'Real-world' effectiveness of omalizumab in adults with severe allergic asthma: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2020; 17:73-83. [PMID: 33307892 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1856658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Severe asthma affects 5-10% of the 350 million people with asthma worldwide. Findings from the authors' previous meta-analysis supported omalizumab use as an adjuvant treatment for severe allergic asthma. The publication of fourteen new articles necessitates an update of the meta-analysis.Objective: To evaluate the 'real-world' effectiveness of omalizumab in the treatment of acute allergic asthma in adults by calculating pooled effects estimates from data in published articles.Methods: Articles on omalizumab effectiveness in 'real-world' settings were identified. Effect sizes, including point estimates of the proportion of patients who met a given criteria, mean improvements relative to baseline, and change in the proportion of patients requiring oral corticosteroids compared to baseline were extracted. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to pool effect sizes based on proportions. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) were calculated from means and standard deviations. Relative risk was calculated from changes in proportions. Variability within and between studies was evaluated.Results: Omalizumab increases the percentage of individuals rated 'good' or 'excellent' on the Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness Scale. Omalizumab also improves respiratory function, quality-of-life, and asthma control while reducing medication usage, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and adverse events.Conclusion: 'Real-world' evidence continues to support the use of omalizumab as adjuvant treatment for severe allergic asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth M Faulkner
- Connell School of Nursing, Boston College William F, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.,School of Nursing, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Ivo Abraham
- Division of Research, Matrix45, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona Center For, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Pharmacy and College of Medicine, University of Arizona College Of, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Christopher S Lee
- Connell School of Nursing, Boston College William F, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bousquet J, Grattan CE, Akdis CA, Eigenmann PA, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Agache I, Jutel M. Highlights and recent developments in allergic diseases in EAACI journals (2019). Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:56. [PMID: 33292572 PMCID: PMC7712618 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00366-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) owns three journals: Allergy, Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and Clinical and Translational Allergy. One of the major goals of EAACI is to support health promotion in which prevention of allergy and asthma plays a critical role and to disseminate the knowledge of allergy to all stakeholders including the EAACI junior members. There was substantial progress in 2019 in the identification of basic mechanisms of allergic and respiratory disease and the translation of these mechanisms into clinics. Better understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms, efforts for the development of biomarkers for disease prediction, novel prevention and intervention studies, elucidation of mechanisms of multimorbidities, entrance of new drugs in the clinics as well as recently completed phase three clinical studies and publication of a large number of allergen immunotherapy studies and meta-analyses have been the highlights of the last year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Montpellier, France. .,CHRU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
| | - C E Grattan
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - C A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - P A Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - K Hoffmann-Sommergruber
- Depart of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - I Agache
- Transylvania University Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - M Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.,ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Janković SM. A Critique of Pharmacokinetic Calculators for Drug Dosing Individualization. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2020; 45:157-162. [PMID: 31773426 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-019-00589-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The 'one-dose-fits-all' approach where drug dosing regimen is prescribed according to recommendations from a summary of product characteristics is not appropriate for many patients whose clinical characteristics significantly differ from the most frequent ones in a population, as it cannot guarantee optimal exposure of target tissues to the drug. Our aim here is to provide a concise review of pharmacokinetic calculators currently available for clinical use and, at the same time, to suggest the minimum standards that they should satisfy to be routinely used in clinical practice. A systematic search of Medline, Ebsco, Scopus, Scindeks, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was performed to find publications about available pharmacokinetic calculators for drug dose individualization. Theoretically well-founded and mathematically correct calculators for many drugs are available, but only a few calculators for specific drugs have been validated in clinical practice or through clinical trials, and the results published in peer-reviewed journals. The majority of available pharmacokinetic calculators for drug dosing individualization remain unvalidated, i.e., there is no evidence of their efficacy and safety in real-life clinical settings. Pharmacokinetic calculators for drug dose individualization are irreplaceable tools for achieving precision medicine, where dosing regimens are tailored to the needs and personal characteristics of each patient, maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slobodan M Janković
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Svetozara Markovića Street, 69, 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kostikas K, Rhee CK, Hurst JR, Agostoni P, Cao H, Fogel R, Jones R, Kocks JWH, Mezzi K, Wan Yau Ming S, Ryan R, Price DB. Adequacy of Therapy for People with Both COPD and Heart Failure in the UK: Historical Cohort Study. Pragmat Obs Res 2020; 11:55-66. [PMID: 32581622 PMCID: PMC7276330 DOI: 10.2147/por.s250451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) often occur concomitantly, presenting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for clinicians. We examined the characteristics of patients prescribed adequate versus inadequate therapy within 3 months after newly diagnosed comorbid COPD or HF. Patients and Methods Eligible patients in longitudinal UK electronic medical record databases had pre-existing HF and newly diagnosed COPD (2017 GOLD groups B/C/D) or pre-existing COPD and newly diagnosed HF. Adequate COPD therapy was defined as long-acting bronchodilator(s) with/without inhaled corticosteroid; adequate HF therapy was defined as beta-blocker plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and/or angiotensin receptor blocker. Results Of 2439 patients with HF and newly diagnosed COPD (mean 75 years, 61% men), adequate COPD therapy was prescribed for 726 (30%) and inadequate for 1031 (42%); 682 (28%) remained untreated for COPD. Adequate (vs inadequate) COPD therapy was less likely for women (35%) than men (45%), smokers (36%) than ex-/non-smokers (45%), and non-obese (41%) than obese (47%); spirometry was recorded for 57% prescribed adequate versus 35% inadequate COPD therapy. Of 12,587 patients with COPD and newly diagnosed HF (mean 75 years, 60% men), adequate HF therapy was prescribed for 2251 (18%) and inadequate for 5332 (42%); 5004 (40%) remained untreated for HF. Adequate (vs inadequate) HF therapy was less likely for smokers (27%) than ex-/non-smokers (32%) and non-obese (30%) than obese (35%); spirometry was recorded for 65% prescribed adequate versus 39% inadequate HF therapy. Conclusion Many patients with comorbid COPD/HF receive inadequate therapy after new diagnosis. Improved equity of access to integrated care is needed for all patient subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chin Kook Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - John R Hurst
- UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
| | - Piergiuseppe Agostoni
- Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Hui Cao
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Robert Fogel
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Rupert Jones
- Plymouth University, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ronan Ryan
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Effect of nasal irrigation on allergic rhinitis control in children; complementarity between CARAT and MASK outcomes. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:9. [PMID: 32190296 PMCID: PMC7068957 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00313-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nasal irrigations (NI) are increasingly used as an over-the-counter adjunctive treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR), but clinical studies on their effectiveness are limited. Methods An open-label, controlled, non-randomized, real-life study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of NI with a new hypertonic solution as add-on treatment for AR. Children and adolescents with AR were prescribed symptomatic treatment. The active group also received an additional sea-water NI solution supplemented with algae extracts. The primary endpoint was symptom control, assessed by the control of allergic rhinitis and asthma test (CARAT) questionnaires. Moreover, the MASK/Allergy Diary was used to track symptoms and daily medication use that were combined in a novel total symptom/medication score (TSMS). Results We assessed 76 patients. Overall, there was a significant improvement of CARAT results (median Z-score change of 1.1 in the active/NI group vs. 0.4 in the control group; p = 0.035). Among patients > 12 years old (n = 51), there was a significant improvement in CARAT10 results among participants receiving NI (21.0 to 25.5; p < 0.001), but not in the regular treatment group (21.5 to 24.0; p = 0.100). For children < 12 years old (n = 25), the ΝΙ group had significantly improved symptom control (CARATKids results: 5.0 to 2.0; p = 0.002), in contrast to the control group (4.0 to 2.5; p = 0.057). MASK data on allergic symptoms were comparable between groups. However, the NI group had lower TSMS, more days with < 20% symptoms and fewer days using symptomatic treatment (26.9% vs. 43.5%; p = 0.005). Conclusion Addition of NI with a sea-water solution to regular treatment improved AR symptom control. CARAT questionnaires and MASK application can be useful outcome tools in real-life studies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-World Data in Allergen Immunotherapy Today and in the Future: Quality or Quantity? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-019-00213-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
19
|
Roche N, Anzueto A, Bosnic Anticevich S, Kaplan A, Miravitlles M, Ryan D, Soriano JB, Usmani O, Papadopoulos NG, Canonica GW. The importance of real-life research in respiratory medicine: manifesto of the Respiratory Effectiveness Group: Endorsed by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group and the World Allergy Organization. Eur Respir J 2019; 54:54/3/1901511. [PMID: 31537655 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01511-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Roche
- Respiratory Medicine, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP and Université de Paris (UMR1016), Paris, France .,Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK
| | - Antonio Anzueto
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,University of Texas Health and South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Sinthia Bosnic Anticevich
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alan Kaplan
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Dept of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Miravitlles
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Pneumology Dept, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dermot Ryan
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joan B Soriano
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Omar Usmani
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital, Airways Disease Section, London, UK
| | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,N. Papadopoulos and G.W. Canonica are joint last authors
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Respiratory Effectiveness Group Board of Directors, Ely, UK.,Respiratory Disease and Allergy Clinic, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,N. Papadopoulos and G.W. Canonica are joint last authors
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Campbell JD, Perry R, Papadopoulos NG, Krishnan J, Brusselle G, Chisholm A, Bjermer L, Thomas M, van Ganse E, van den Berge M, Quint J, Price D, Roche N. The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): development of a novel quality assurance asset to rate observational comparative effectiveness research studies. Clin Transl Allergy 2019; 9:21. [PMID: 30962876 PMCID: PMC6436213 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-019-0256-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence from observational comparative effectiveness research (CER) is ranked below that from randomized controlled trials in traditional evidence hierarchies. However, asthma observational CER studies represent an important complementary evidence source answering different research questions and are particularly valuable in guiding clinical decision making in real-life patient and practice settings. Tools are required to assist in quality appraisal of observational CER to enable identification of and confidence in high-quality CER evidence to inform guideline development. METHODS The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was developed through a step-wise approach. We conducted an iterative refinement of the tool based on Task Force member expertise and feedback from pilot testing the tool until reaching adequate inter-rater agreement percentages. Two distinct pilots were conducted-the first involving six members of the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) joint Task Force for quality appraisal of observational asthma CER; the second involving 22 members of REG and EAACI membership. The final tool consists of 21 quality sub-items distributed across seven methodology domains: Background, Design, Measures, Analysis, Results, Discussion/Interpretation, and Conflict of Interest. Eleven of these sub-items are considered critical and named "primary sub-items". RESULTS Following the second pilot, RELEVANT showed inter-rater agreement ≥ 70% for 94% of all primary and 93% for all secondary sub-items tested across three rater groups. For observational CER to be classified as sufficiently high quality for future guideline consideration, all RELEVANT primary sub-items must be fulfilled. The ten secondary sub-items further qualify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the published CER evidence. RELEVANT could also be applicable to general quality appraisal of observational CER across other medical specialties. CONCLUSIONS RELEVANT is the first quality checklist to assist in the appraisal of published observational CER developed through iterative feedback derived from pilot implementation and inter-rater agreement evaluation. Developed for a REG-EAACI Task Force quality appraisal of recent asthma CER, RELEVANT also has wider utility to support appraisal of CER literature in general (including pre-publication). It may also assist in manuscript development and in educating relevant stakeholders about key quality markers in observational CER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D. Campbell
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Robert Perry
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jerry Krishnan
- Population Health Sciences Program, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Departments of Epidemiology and Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leif Bjermer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Institute of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Michael Thomas
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Eric van Ganse
- Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, UMR CNRS 5558, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Maarten van den Berge
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Quint
- Respiratory Epidemiology, Occupational Medicine and Public Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Price
- Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Hôpital Cochin (APHP), University Paris Descartes (EA2511), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|