Nebulized antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients: a challenge for translational research from technology to clinical care

Tobramycin Reduces Pulmonary Toxicity of Polymyxin B via Inhibiting the Megalin-Mediated Drug Uptake in the Human Lung Epithelial Cells

Accumulation of polymyxins in the lung epithelial cells can lead to increased mitochondrial oxidative stress and pulmonary toxicity. Aminoglycosides and polymyxins are used, via intravenous and pulmonary delivery, against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Our recent in vitro and animal studies demonstrated that the co-administration of polymyxins with aminoglycosides decreases polymyxin-induced pulmonary toxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro transport and uptake of polymyxin B and tobramycin in human lung epithelial Calu-3 cells and the mechanism of reduced pulmonary toxicity resulting from this combination. Transport, intracellular localization, and accumulation of polymyxin B and tobramycin were investigated using doses of 30 mg/L polymyxin B, 70 mg/L tobramycin, and the combination of both. Adding tobramycin significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the polymyxin B-induced cytotoxicity in Calu-3 cells. The combination treatment significantly reduced the transport and uptake of polymyxin B and tobramycin in Calu-3 cells, compared to each drug alone, which supported the reduced pulmonary toxicity. We hypothesized that cellular uptake of polymyxin B and tobramycin shared a common transporter, megalin. We further investigated the megalin expression of Calu-3 cells using confocal microscopy and evaluated megalin activity using a megalin substrate, FITC-BSA, and a megalin inhibitor, sodium maleate. Both polymyxin B and tobramycin significantly inhibited FITC-BSA uptake by Calu-3 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Sodium maleate substantially inhibited polymyxin B and tobramycin transport and cellular accumulation in the Calu-3 cell monolayer. Our study demonstrated that the significantly reduced uptake of polymyxin B and tobramycin in Calu-3 cells is attributed to the mechanism of action that determines that polymyxin B and tobramycin share a common transporter, megalin.

Inhaled Amikacin to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Whether preventive inhaled antibiotics may reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia is unclear.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, superiority trial, we assigned critically ill adults who had been undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours to receive inhaled amikacin at a dose of 20 mg per kilogram of ideal body weight once daily or to receive placebo for 3 days. The primary outcome was a first episode of ventilator-associated pneumonia during 28 days of follow-up. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 850 patients underwent randomization, and 847 were included in the analyses (417 assigned to the amikacin group and 430 to the placebo group). All three daily nebulizations were received by 337 patients (81%) in the amikacin group and 355 patients (83%) in the placebo group. At 28 days, ventilator-associated pneumonia had developed in 62 patients (15%) in the amikacin group and in 95 patients (22%) in the placebo group (difference in restricted mean survival time to ventilator-associated pneumonia, 1.5 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 2.5; P = 0.004). An infection-related ventilator-associated complication occurred in 74 patients (18%) in the amikacin group and in 111 patients (26%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.89). Trial-related serious adverse effects were seen in 7 patients (1.7%) in the amikacin group and in 4 patients (0.9%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days, a subsequent 3-day course of inhaled amikacin reduced the burden of ventilator-associated pneumonia during 28 days of follow-up. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; AMIKINHAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03149640; EUDRA Clinical Trials number, 2016-001054-17.).

Administration of Bacteriophages via Nebulization during Mechanical Ventilation: In Vitro Study and Lung Deposition in Macaques

Bacteriophages have been identified as a potential treatment option to treat lung infection in the context of antibiotic resistance. We performed a preclinical study to predict the efficacy of delivery of bacteriophages against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) when administered via nebulization during mechanical ventilation (MV). We selected a mix of four anti-PA phages containing two Podoviridae and two Myoviridae, with a coverage of 87.8% (36/41) on an international PA reference panel. When administered via nebulization, a loss of 0.30–0.65 log of infective phage titers was measured. No difference between jet, ultrasonic and mesh nebulizers was observed in terms of loss of phage viability, but a higher output was measured with the mesh nebulizer. Interestingly, Myoviridae are significantly more sensitive to nebulization than Podoviridae since their long tail is much more prone to damage. Phage nebulization has been measured as compatible with humidified ventilation. Based on in vitro measurement, the lung deposition prediction of viable phage particles ranges from 6% to 26% of the phages loaded in the nebulizer. Further, 8% to 15% of lung deposition was measured by scintigraphy in three macaques. A phage dose of 1 × 109 PFU/mL nebulized by the mesh nebulizer during MV predicts an efficient dose in the lung against PA, comparable with the dose chosen to define the susceptibility of the strain.

Inhaled amikacin for pneumonia treatment and dissemination prevention: an experimental model of severe monolateral Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia is commonly treated with systemic antibiotics to ensure adequate treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, intravenous (IV) antibiotics often achieve suboptimal pulmonary concentrations. We therefore aimed to evaluate the effect of inhaled amikacin (AMK) plus IV meropenem (MEM) on bactericidal efficacy in a swine model of monolateral MDR P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

METHODS

We ventilated 18 pigs with monolateral MDR P. aeruginosa pneumonia for up to 102 h. At 24 h after the bacterial challenge, the animals were randomized to receive 72 h of treatment with either inhaled saline (control), IV MEM only, or IV-MEM plus inhaled AMK (MEM + AMK). We dosed IV MEM at 25 mg/kg every 8 h and inhaled AMK at 400 mg every 12 h. The primary outcomes were the P. aeruginosa burden and histopathological injury in lung tissue. Secondary outcomes included the P. aeruginosa burden in tracheal secretions and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, the development of antibiotic resistance, the antibiotic distribution, and the levels of inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

The median (25-75th percentile) P. aeruginosa lung burden for animals in the control, MEM only, and MEM + AMK groups was 2.91 (1.75-5.69), 0.72 (0.12-3.35), and 0.90 (0-4.55) log10 CFU/g (p = 0.009). Inhaled therapy had no effect on preventing dissemination compared to systemic monotherapy, but it did have significantly higher bactericidal efficacy in tracheal secretions only. Remarkably, the minimum inhibitory concentration of MEM increased to > 32 mg/L after 72-h exposure to monotherapy in 83% of animals, while the addition of AMK prevented this increase (p = 0.037). Adjunctive therapy also slightly affected interleukin-1β downregulation. Despite finding high AMK concentrations in pulmonary samples, we found no paired differences in the epithelial lining fluid concentration between infected and non-infected lungs. Finally, a non-significant trend was observed for higher amikacin penetration in low-affected lung areas.

CONCLUSIONS

In a swine model of monolateral MDR P. aeruginosa pneumonia, resistant to the inhaled AMK and susceptible to the IV antibiotic, the use of AMK as an adjuvant treatment offered no benefits for either the colonization of pulmonary tissue or the prevention of pathogen dissemination. However, inhaled AMK improved bacterial eradication in the proximal airways and hindered antibiotic resistance.

Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with novel agents: a contemporary, multidisciplinary ESGCIP perspective

INTRODUCTION

: In the past 15 years, treatment of VAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has represented an intricate challenge for clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

In this perspective article, we discuss the available clinical data about novel agents for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP, together with general PK/PD principles for the treatment of VAP, in the attempt to provide some suggestions for optimizing antimicrobial therapy of CR-GNB VAP in the daily clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, novel BL and BL/BLI combinations have become available that have shown potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB and have attracted much interest as novel, less toxic, and possibly more efficacious options for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP compared with previous standard of care. Besides randomized controlled trials, a good solution to enrich our knowledge on how to use these novel agents at best in the near future, while at the same time remaining adherent to current evidence-based guidelines, is to improve our collaboration to conduct larger multinational observational studies to collect sufficiently large populations treated in real life with those novel agents for which guidelines currently do not provide a recommendation (in favor or against) for certain causative organisms.

The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?

Respiratory infection is common in intubated/tracheotomized patients and systemic antibiotic therapy is often unrewarding. In 1967, the difficulty in treating Gram-negative respiratory infections led to the use of inhaled gentamicin, targeting therapy directly to the lungs. Fifty-three years later, the effects of topical therapy in the intubated patient remain undefined. Clinical failures with intravenous antibiotics persist and instrumented patients are now infected by many more multidrug-resistant Gram-negative species as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that there may be a role for inhaled delivery but “more research is needed.” Yet there is still no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved inhaled antibiotic for the treatment of ventilator-associated infection, the hallmark of which is the foreign body in the upper airway. Current pulmonary and infectious disease guidelines suggest using aerosols only in the setting of Gram-negative infections that are resistant to all systemic antibiotics or not to use them at all. Recently two seemingly well-designed large randomized placebo-controlled Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials of adjunctive inhaled therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia failed to show more rapid resolution of pneumonia symptoms or effect on mortality. Despite evolving technology of delivery devices and more detailed understanding of the factors affecting delivery, treatment effects were no better than placebo. What is wrong with our approach to ventilator- associated infection? Is there a message from the large meta-analyses and these two large recent multisite trials? This review will suggest why current therapies are unpredictable and have not fulfilled the promise of better outcomes. Data suggest that future studies of inhaled therapy, in the milieu of worsening bacterial resistance, require new approaches with completely different indications and endpoints to determine whether inhaled therapy indeed has an important role in the treatment of ventilated patients.

Treatment of Severe Infections Due to Metallo-Betalactamases Enterobacterales in Critically Ill Patients

Metallo-beta-lactamases-producing (MBL) Enterobacterales is a growing problem worldwide. The optimization of antibiotic therapy is challenging. The pivotal available therapeutic options are either the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam or cefiderocol. Colistin, fosfomycin, tetracyclines and aminoglycosides are also frequently effective in vitro, but are associated with less bactericidal activity or more toxicity. Prior to the availability of antibiotic susceptibility testing, severe infections should be treated with a combination therapy. A careful optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of antimicrobials is instrumental in severe infections. The rules of antibiotic therapy are also reported and discussed. To conclude, treatment of severe MBL infections in critically ill patients is difficult. It should be individualized with a close collaboration of intensivists with microbiologists, pharmacists and infection control practitioners.

Nebulized Antibiotics for Healthcare- and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Global emergence of multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria has increased the risk of treatment failure, especially for healthcare- or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). Nebulization of antibiotics, by providing high intrapulmonary antibiotic concentrations, represents a promising approach to optimize the treatment of HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, while limiting systemic antibiotic exposure. Aminoglycosides and colistin methanesulfonate are the most common nebulized antibiotics. Although optimal nebulized drug dosing regimen is not clearly established, high antibiotic doses should be administered using vibrating-mesh nebulizer with optimized ventilator settings to ensure safe and effective intrapulmonary concentrations. When used preventively, nebulized antibiotics reduced the incidence of VAP without any effect on mortality. This approach is not yet recommended and large randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm its benefit and explore the impact on antibiotic selection pressure. Compared with high-dose intravenous administration, high-dose nebulized colistin methanesulfonate seems to be more effective and safer in the treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and VAP caused by multidrug resistant and extensive-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria. Adjunctive nebulized aminoglycosides could increase the clinical cure rate and bacteriological eradication in patients suffering from HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. As nebulized aminoglycosides broadly diffuse in the systemic circulation of patients with extensive bronchopneumonia, monitoring of plasma trough concentrations is recommended during the period of nebulization. Large randomized controlled trials comparing high dose of nebulized colistin methanesulfonate to high dose of intravenous colistin methanesulfonate or to intravenous new β-lactams in HAP/VAP due to multidrug-resistant and extensive drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria are urgently needed.

Antibacterial Activity of Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oil Vapours and Their GC/MS Analysis Using Solid-Phase Microextraction and Syringe Headspace Sampling Techniques

While the inhalation of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil (EO) is commonly approved for the treatment of mild respiratory infections, there is still a lack of data regarding the antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of its vapours. The antibacterial activity of the three T. vulgaris EOs against respiratory pathogens, including Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus pyogenes, was assessed in both liquid and vapour phases using the broth microdilution volatilisation (BMV) method. With the aim of optimising a protocol for the characterisation of EO vapours, their chemical profiles were determined using two headspace sampling techniques coupled with GC/MS: solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and syringe headspace sampling technique (HS-GTS). All EO sample vapours exhibited antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) ranging from 512 to 1024 μg/mL. According to the sampling technique used, results showed a different distribution of volatile compounds. Notably, thymol was found in lower amounts in the headspace—peak percentage areas below 5.27% (HS-SPME) and 0.60% (HS-GTS)—than in EOs (max. 48.65%), suggesting that its antimicrobial effect is higher in vapour. Furthermore, both headspace sampling techniques were proved to be complementary for the analysis of EO vapours, whereas HS-SPME yielded more accurate qualitative results and HS-GTS proved a better technique for quantitative analysis.

Inhaled amikacin versus placebo to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: the AMIKINHAL double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Pre-emptive inhaled antibiotics may be effective to reduce the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia among critically ill patients. Meta-analysis of small sample size trials showed a favourable signal. Inhaled antibiotics are associated with a reduced emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the benefit of a 3-day course of inhaled antibiotics among patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days on the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Academic, investigator-initiated, parallel two group arms, double-blind, multicentre superiority randomised controlled trial. Patients invasively ventilated more than 3 days will be randomised to receive 20 mg/kg inhaled amikacin daily for 3 days or inhaled placebo (0.9% Sodium Chloride). Occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia will be recorded based on a standardised diagnostic framework from randomisation to day 28 and adjudicated by a centralised blinded committee.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol and amendments have been approved by the regional ethics review board and French competent authorities (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest I, No.2016-R29). All patients will be included after informed consent according to French law. Results will be disseminated in international scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

EudraCT 2016-001054-17 and NCT03149640.

Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients

A fundamental step in the successful management of sepsis and septic shock is early empiric antimicrobial therapy. However, for this to be effective, several decisions must be addressed simultaneously: (1) antimicrobial choices should be adequate, covering the most probable pathogens; (2) they should be administered in the appropriate dose, (3) by the correct route, and (4) using the correct mode of administration to achieve successful concentration at the infection site. In critically ill patients, antimicrobial dosing is a common challenge and a frequent source of errors, since these patients present deranged pharmacokinetics, namely increased volume of distribution and altered drug clearance, which either increased or decreased. Moreover, the clinical condition of these patients changes markedly over time, either improving or deteriorating. The consequent impact on drug pharmacokinetics further complicates the selection of correct drug schedules and dosing during the course of therapy. In recent years, the knowledge of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, drug dosing, therapeutic drug monitoring, and antimicrobial resistance in the critically ill patients has greatly improved, fostering strategies to optimize therapeutic efficacy and to reduce toxicity and adverse events. Nonetheless, delivering adequate and appropriate antimicrobial therapy is still a challenge, since pathogen resistance continues to rise, and new therapeutic agents remain scarce. We aim to review the available literature to assess the challenges, impact, and tools to optimize individualization of antimicrobial dosing to maximize exposure and effectiveness in critically ill patients.

Inhaled antibiotics during mechanical ventilation-why it will work

Inhaled antibiotics are a common therapy among patients suffering recurrent or chronic pulmonary infections. Their use is less frequent in acutely ill patients despite a strong theoretical rationale and growing evidence of their efficiency, safety and beneficial effect on reducing bacterial resistance emergence. Clinical trials of inhaled antibiotics have shown contradictory results among mechanically ventilated patients. The optimal nebulization setup, not always implemented in all trials, the difficulty to identify the population most likely to benefit and the testing of various therapeutic strategies such as adjunctive versus alternative to systemic antibiotics may explain the disparity in trial results. The present review first presents the reasons why inhaled antibiotics have to be developed and the benefits to be expected of inhaled anti-infectious therapy among mechanically ventilated patients. A second part develops the constraints of aerosolized therapies that one has to be aware of and the simple actions required during nebulization to ensure optimal delivery to the distal lung parenchyma. Positive and negative studies concerning inhaled antibiotics are compared to understand the discrepancies of their findings and conclusions. The last part presents current developments and perspective which will likely turn it into a fully successful therapeutic modality, and makes the link between inhaled antibiotics and inhaled anti-infectious therapy.

Droplet Size and Distribution of Nebulized 3% Sodium Chloride, Albuterol, and Epoprostenol by Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer

Background

Aerosolized drug therapy administered to mechanically ventilated patients is a standard part of pulmonary critical care medicine. Aerosol particle size and distribution are important factors in the optimal delivery of aerosolized drugs to ventilated patients.

Objective

The objective of this study was to characterize aerosol droplet size and distribution with laser diffraction for nebulized 3% sodium chloride, albuterol, and epoprostenol sodium (containing glycine) delivered via Aeroneb Solo Mesh Nebulizers (Aerogen, Mountain View, California).

Methods

A series of functional flow tests were run on each of 8 Solo mesh nebulizers before the study to verify accuracy of flow rates in milliliters per minute. Aerosolized droplets exiting the nebulizer heads were then measured using a phase Doppler particle analyzer. Data collected during delivery of 3% sodium chloride, albuterol, and epoprostenol sodium included aerosol droplet size distribution, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), and geometric standard deviation. For each Solo nebulizer, droplet size measurements were taken 2 cm away from the nebulizer head and 2 cm away from the wye of a heated, humidified adult ventilator circuit. For measurements taken at the wye, 4 distinct, continuous flow rates (2, 10, 20, and 40 L/min) were generated by an air pump to simulate inspiratory flows delivered with mechanical ventilation. The expiratory limb was capped, and the nebulizer head was inserted into the breathing circuit upstream of the humidifier.

Results

Each Solo nebulizer met Aerogen's recommended minimum flow rate of 0.2 mL/min, ranging from 0.23 to 0.31 mL/min. The MMAD of the 3 tested aerosols was several times smaller when measured at the wye outlet of the heated/humidified breathing circuit (0.82–2.73 µm) compared with droplets measured directly at the nebulizer outlet (MMAD, 4.6–7.3 µm). There was also significant variability across Solo heads with some ventilator flow rates. The mean MMAD at the wye for the 3% sodium chloride solution, albuterol, and epoprostenol test solutions was 1.62 µm, 1.09 µm, and 1.18 µm, respectively. The mean MMAD at the nebulizer for the 3% sodium chloride solution, albuterol, and epoprostenol test solutions was 5.37 µm, 5.73 µm, and 6.73 µm, respectively.

Conclusions

Results from this study suggest that particle size of aerosolized drugs administered via a commonly used setup for delivery of in-line aerosols to mechanically ventilated patients may be several times smaller than expected and may result in less drug being delivered to the patient than previously realized.

(Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021; 82:XXX–XXX)

© 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Systemic pharmacokinetics and safety of high doses of nebulized colistimethate sodium in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the pharmacokinetics of formed colistin in plasma and the safety of two different high doses of colistimethate sodium administered via nebulization in critically ill surgical patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Formed colistin plasma concentrations were measured in critically ill surgical patients with pneumonia treated with two different doses of nebulized colistimethate sodium (3 MIU/8 h versus 5 MIU/8 h). Adverse events possibly related to nebulized colistimethate sodium were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (15 in the 3 MIU/8 h group and 12 in the 5 MIU/8 h group) were included. Colistin plasma concentrations were unquantifiable (<0.1 mg/L) in eight (53.3%) patients in the 3 MIU/8 h group and in seven patients (58.3%) in the 5 MIU/8 h group. Median (IQR) quantifiable colistin plasma concentrations before nebulization and at 1, 4 and 8 h were 0.17 (0.12-0.33), 0.20 (0.11-0.24), 0.17 (0.12-0.23) and 0.17 (0.11-0.32) mg/L, respectively, in the 3 MIU/8 h group and 0.20 (0.11-0.35), 0.24 (0.12-0.44), 0.24 (0.10-0.49) and 0.23 (0.11-0.44) mg/L, respectively, in the 5 MIU/8 h group, with no differences between the two groups at any time. Renal impairment during nebulized treatment was observed in three patients in each group, but was unlikely to be related to colistimethate sodium treatment. Nebulized colistimethate sodium therapy was well tolerated and no bronchospasms or neurotoxicity events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this limited observational case series of critically ill patients with HAP or VAP treated with high doses of nebulized colistimethate sodium, systemic exposure was minimal and the treatment was well tolerated.

The role of antibiotic pharmacokinetic studies performed post-licensing

Post-licensing pharmacometric studies can provide a better understanding of the pharmacokinetic (PK) alterations in special patient populations and may lead to better clinical outcomes. Some patient populations exhibit markedly different pathophysiology to general ward patients or healthy individuals. This may be developmental (paediatric patients), a manifestation of an underlying disease pathology (patients with obesity or haematological malignancies) or due to medical interventions (critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal therapies). This paper outlines the factors that affect the PK of special patient populations and describes some novel methods of antimicrobial administration that may increase antimicrobial concentrations at the site of infection and improve treatment of severe infection.

Inhaled amikacin adjunctive to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia (INHALE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3, superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment of ventilated pneumonia is often unsuccessful, even when patients are treated according to established guidelines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combination drug device Amikacin Inhale as an adjunctive therapy to intravenous standard-of-care antibiotics for pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

INHALE was a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study comprising two trials (INHALE 1 and INHALE 2) done in 153 hospital intensive-care units in 25 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older; had pneumonia that had been diagnosed by chest radiography and that was documented as being caused by or showing two risk factors for a Gram-negative, multidrug-resistant pathogen; were intubated and mechanically ventilated; had impaired oxygenation within 48 h before screening; and had a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of at least 6. Patients were stratified by region and disease severity (according to their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score) and randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-recognition system to receive 400 mg amikacin (Amikacin Inhale) or saline placebo, both of which were aerosolised, administered every 12 h for 10 days via the same synchronised inhalation system, and given alongside standard-of-care intravenous antibiotics. All patients and all staff involved in administering devices and monitoring outcomes were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, survival at days 28-32, was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, were infected with a Gram-negative pathogen, and had an APACHE II score of at least 10 at diagnosis. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01799993 and NCT00805168.

FINDINGS

Between April 13, 2013, and April 7, 2017, 807 patients were assessed for eligibility and 725 were randomly assigned to Amikacin Inhale (362 patients) or aerosolised placebo (363 patients). 712 patients received at least one dose of study drug (354 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 358 in the placebo group), although one patient assigned to Amikacin Inhale received placebo in error and was included in the placebo group for safety analyses. 508 patients (255 in the Amikacin Inhale group and 253 in the placebo group) were assessed for the primary endpoint. We found no between-group difference in survival: 191 (75%) patients in the Amikacin Inhale group versus 196 (77%) patients in the placebo group survived until days 28-32 (odds ratio 0·841, 95% CI 0·554-1·277; p=0·43). Similar proportions of patients in the two treatment groups had a treatment-emergent adverse event (295 [84%] of 353 patients in the Amikacin Inhale group vs 303 [84%] of 359 patients in the placebo group) or a serious treatment-emergent adverse event (101 [29%] patients vs 97 [27%] patients).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings do not support use of inhaled amikacin adjunctive to standard-of-care intravenous therapy in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia.

FUNDING

Bayer AG.

Influence of diluent volume of colistimethate sodium on aerosol characteristics and pharmacokinetics in ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by MDR bacteria

Objectives

Nebulized colistimethate sodium (CMS) can be used to treat ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by MDR bacteria. The influence of the diluent volume of CMS on aerosol delivery has never been studied. The main objectives of the study were to compare aerosol particle characteristics and plasma and urine pharmacokinetics between two diluent volumes in patients treated with nebulized CMS.

Methods

A crossover study was conducted in eight patients receiving nebulized CMS every 8 h. After inclusion, nebulization started with 4 million international units (MIU) of CMS diluted either in 6 mL (experimental dilution) or in 12 mL (recommended dilution) of normal saline in a random order. For each diluent volume, CMS aerosol particle sizes were measured and plasma and urine samples were collected every 2 h. Nebulization time and stability of colistin in normal saline were assessed.

Results

The mass median aerodynamic diameters were 1.4 ± 0.2 versus 0.9 ± 0.2 μm (P < 0.001) for 6 and 12 mL diluent volumes, respectively. The plasma area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8) of colistinA+B was 6.6 (4.3-17.0) versus 6.7 (3.6-14.0) μg·h/mL (P = 0.461) for each dilution. The total amount of colistin and CMS eliminated in the urine represented, respectively, 17% and 13% of the CMS initially placed in the nebulizer chamber for 6 and 12 mL diluent volumes (P = 0.4). Nebulization time was shorter [66 (58-75) versus 93 (69-136) min, P = 0.042] and colistin stability was better with the 6 mL diluent volume.

Conclusions

Nebulization with a higher concentration of CMS in saline (4 MIU in 6 mL) decreases nebulization time and improves colistin stability without changing plasma and urine pharmacokinetics or aerosol particle characteristics for lung deposition.

Size Distribution of Colistin Delivery by Different Type Nebulizers and Concentrations During Mechanical Ventilation

Although aerosol delivery through mechanical ventilators has been used to administer various medications, little is known of administration with colistin. This in vitro evaluation aimed to evaluate size distribution of colistin delivery by different types of nebulizers and concentrations during mechanical ventilation. Colistin methanesulfonate (colistin) for injection was dissolved in 6 mL of distilled water to produce a low concentration (L; 156 mg) and a high concentration (H; 312 mg). A dose volume of 6 mL was placed in a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) and a jet nebulizer (JN). The inhaled mass (mean ± SD) of the VMN-L (53.80 ± 14.79 mg) was greater than both the JN-L (19.82 ± 3.34 mg, P = 0.001) and JN-H (31.72 ± 4.48 mg, P = 0.017). The nebulization time of the VMN-L (42.35 ± 2.30 min) was two times longer than the JN-L (21.12 ± 0.8 min) or JN-H (21.65 ± 0.42 min; P < 0.001). The mass median aerodynamic distal to the endotracheal tube was within a similar range at 2.03 to 2.26 μm (P = 0.434), independent of neb or formulation concentration. In conclusion, the VMN-L yields greater inhaled mass than the JN with either concentration. Therefore, a standard nominal dose of colistin results in a higher delivered dose during mechanical ventilation with a VMN compared with a JN and may be considered the preferred device. If JN must be used, multiple doses of low concentration colistin may compensate for poor delivery performance.

Intra-tracheal amikacin spray delivery in healthy mechanically ventilated piglets

BACKGROUND

Nebulization during mechanical ventilation is impeded by large extra-pulmonary drug deposition and long administration durations which currently limit implementation of inhaled antibiotic therapy. Direct intra-tracheal delivery using a sprayer represents an appealing alternative investigated in small animal models, but large animal data are lacking.

METHODS

Amikacin was administered through intravenous infusion (20 mg/kg), nebulization (60 mg/kg) and direct intra-tracheal spray (30 mg/kg) to 10 intubated piglets, in a randomized cross-over design. Amikacin concentrations were measured in the serum and pulmonary parenchyma. Anatomic deposition was investigated using immuno-histochemistry.

RESULTS

Spray delivery resulted in higher amikacin outputs than nebulization and infusion. Pulmonary inhaled delivery techniques yielded much higher lung concentrations and much lower serum concentrations than intravenous infusion. However, unlike nebulization and infusion, intra-tracheal spray delivery was associated with more than 100- and 1000-fold variability in lung concentrations between and within animals. Amikacin specific immuno-histochemistry showed consistent bronchial and alveolar drug deposition with all modalities.

CONCLUSION

Nebulization remains the most reliable and simple technique to deliver inhaled amikacin uniformly to the lung during mechanical ventilation. Further development of tracheal sprays is required to take advantage of potential benefits related to high drug output and low extra-pulmonary deposition in large animals.

Adjunctive Nebulized Antibiotics: What Is Their Place in ICU Infections?

Inhaled antibiotics have been used as adjunctive therapy for patients with pneumonia, primarily caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens. Most studies have been in ventilated patients, although non-ventilated patients have also been included (but not discussed in this review), and most patients have had nosocomial pneumonia. Aerosolized antibiotics are generally added to systemic therapy, and have shown efficacy, primarily as salvage therapy for failing patients and as adjunctive therapy after an MDR gram-negative has been identified. An advantage to aerosolized antibiotics is that they can achieve high intra-pulmonary concentrations that are potentially effective, even for highly resistant pathogens, and because they are generally not well-absorbed systemically, it is possible to avoid some of the toxicities of systemic therapy. When using inhaled antibiotics, it is essential to choose the appropriate agent and the optimal delivery method. Animal and human studies have shown that aerosolized antibiotics reach higher concentrations in the lung than systemic antibiotics, but that areas of dense pneumonia may not receive as much antibiotic as less affected areas of lung. Optimal delivery in ventilated patients depends on device selection, generally with a preference for vibrating mesh nebulizers and with careful attention to where the device is placed in the ventilator circuit and how the delivery is coordinated with the ventilator cycle. Although some studies have shown a benefit for clinical cure, adjunctive therapy has not led to reduced mortality. In some studies, adjunctive aerosol therapy has reduced the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy, thus serving to promote antimicrobial stewardship. Two recent multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive nebulized antibiotics for VAP patients with suspected MDR gram-negative pneumonia were negative for their primary endpoints. This may have been related to trial design and execution and the lessons learned from these studies need to be incorporated in any future trials. Currently, routine use of adjunctive aerosolized therapy cannot be supported by available data, and this therapy is only recommended to assist in the eradication of highly resistant pathogens and to be used as salvage therapy for patients failing systemic therapy.

Aerosolized antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Aerosolized antibiotics have been proposed as a novel and promising treatment option for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the optimum aerosolized antibiotics for VAP remain uncertain.

Methods

We included studies from two systematic reviews and searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for other studies. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Extracted data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analysis.

Results

Eight observational and eight randomized studies were identified for this analysis. By pairwise meta-analysis using intravenous antibiotics as the reference, patients treated with aerosolized antibiotics were associated with significantly higher rates of clinical recovery (risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–1.34; P = 0.001) and microbiological eradication (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.22–1.650; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the risks of mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74–1.04; P = 0.127) or nephrotoxicity (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.72–1.39; P = 0.995). Using network meta-analysis, clinical recovery benefits were seen only with aerosolized tobramycin and colistin (especially tobramycin), and microbiological eradication benefits were seen only with colistin. Aerosolized tobramycin was also associated with significantly lower mortality when compared with aerosolized amikacin and colistin and intravenous antibiotics. The assessment of rank probabilities indicated aerosolized tobramycin presented the greatest likelihood of having benefits for clinical recovery and mortality, and aerosolized colistin presented the best benefits for microbiological eradication.

Conclusions

Aerosolized antibiotics appear to be a useful treatment for VAP with respect to clinical recovery and microbiological eradication, and do not increase mortality or nephrotoxicity risks. Our network meta-analysis in patients with VAP suggests that clinical recovery benefits are associated with aerosolized tobramycin and colistin (especially tobramycin), microbiological eradication with aerosolized colistin, and survival with aerosolized tobramycin, mostly based on observational studies. Due to the low levels of evidence, definitive recommendations cannot be made before additional, large randomized studies are carried out.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2106-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Regulation Effect of a Chinese Herbal Formula on Flora and Mucosal Immune Secretory Immunoglobulin A in Rats

Flora and mucosal immunity are considered to be the barrier, which is associated with multiple respiratory diseases, including recurrent respiratory tract infection (RRTI). Fei-Xi-Tiao-Zhi-Fang (FTF) is a traditional Chinese herbal formula used in the treatment of RRTI. However, the mechanism is little known. This study aims to identify the function of FTF in flora and mucosal immune secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) in the model of RRTI rats. The samples of intestine and lung were collected to detect sIgA, short chain fatty acids (SCFAS), and flora with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), gas chromatography, and 16S rDNA sequencing. The body weight and viscera index were increased dynamically in RRTI rats after the administration of FTF. Furthermore, the types and proportions of aboriginal flora were significantly changed in the model group, whereas the altered flora was rescued in the FTF administration group. Desulfovibrio increased in the intestinal microflora and Ralstonia and Blautia decreased in the pulmonary microflora at the genus level, similar to that in the normal group. In addition, the expressions of sIgA in pulmonary and intestinal tissues were significantly upregulated and the level of SCFAS was increased in FTF group compared to the RRTI model group. Our study suggests that FTF can alleviate the symptoms of RRTI by increasing sIgA and SCFAS, recovering flora, and improving the immunity.

Vibrating Mesh Nebulisers – Can Greater Drug Delivery to the Airways and Lungs Improve Respiratory Outcomes?

Aerosols are an increasingly important mode of delivery of drugs, particularly bronchodilators, for the treatment of respiratory diseases, notably asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The most common type of nebuliser is the jet nebuliser (JN); they have been in use for more than a century but these devices can be cumbersome to use and may sometimes deliver insufficient amounts of drug. A more recent development in aerosol therapy is the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) which is very user friendly and is more efficient than the JNs due to an extremely low residual volume. Scintigraphy images from studies of volunteer subjects using radio-labelled aerosol treatment show that VMN-generated aerosols deliver more drug to patients in a shorter period of time than JN-generated aerosols. Various bench, animal model and small clinical studies have shown that VMNs are more efficient than JNs in drug delivery, potentially improving clinical outcomes. These studies have included various breathing circuits used in mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula systems and devices for spontaneously breathing patients. The efficiency of drug delivery was affected by factors including the position of the nebuliser in the circuit and humidity. Some studies have shown potential substantial savings by hospitals in the cost of MV treatments after switching from metered dose inhalers to VMNs. VMNs have also been shown to be effective for the administration of inhaled antibiotics, corticosteroids and other drugs. Larger studies of the effects of VMNs on patient outcomes are needed but they are likely to be an increasingly important means of administering therapies to a burgeoning population with respiratory disease.