Multidisciplinary team approach in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Comparisons of nursing hours and nurse-to-patient ratios required for patients with mechanical ventilation, CRRT, and ECMO in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

To examine nurse staffing requirements in intensive care units (ICUs) for mechanical ventilation (MV), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and their combinations, and analyze the effects of these procedures on staffing requirements across different types of ICU stay.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients discharged from adult ICUs at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between 2022 and 2023. Staffing requirements were evaluated using nursing hours per patient day (NHPPD) and nurse-to-patient ratios. Each ICU day was categorized into one of eight procedure groups: none of three procedures, one-procedure (MV, CRRT, or ECMO), two-procedure (MV & CRRT, MV & ECMO, or CRRT & ECMO), and three-procedure (MV, CRRT, & ECMO) groups. The impacts of these groups on NHPPD were analyzed using multilevel regression models.

RESULTS

Among a total of 51,226 ICU days from 8,541 patients, the MV group accounted for the largest proportion of ICU days (44.4%), followed by the no-procedure group (38.2%). The overall NHPPD was 14.8 h, with a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:1.6. The no-procedure group had the lowest NHPPD (12.8 h), while the three-procedure group had the highest (18.9 h). The overall NHPPD was highest on continuing-stay days, whereas two- and three-procedure groups tended to have the highest NHPPD on admission days. In multiple regression analyses, the three-procedure group exhibited the greatest increase in NHPPD (4.94 h), followed by the MV & CRRT group (4.42 h) and the MV & ECMO group (3.28 h), compared to the no-procedure group.

CONCLUSIONS

Staffing requirements varied among procedure groups and types of ICU stay. The NHPPD for combined procedures exceeded the sum of the NHPPD for the individual procedures.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Staffing requirements should be tailored to meet the increasing patient needs resulting from procedural complexity.

The Year in Cardiothoracic Transplant Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2022 Part II: Cardiac Transplantation

These highlights focus on research published in the year 2022 and is divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections. The preoperative section includes research on the assessment and optimization of candidates for heart transplantation; donor optimization and the use of extended donors; organ protection systems; donation after circulatory death allografts; recipient factors including cannabis use, sex, race, and comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and peripartum cardiomyopathy; the effects of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on waitlist and postoperative mortality; updates on heart transplantation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019; in pediatric patients; and those who require a bridge to transplant. The intraoperative section includes the use of a multidisciplinary team, a proposed transfusion algorithm, bench surgery on the allograft, and size matching. The postoperative section focuses on the research on the development and management of tricuspid regurgitation, echocardiography, arrhythmia management, and, finally, xenotransplantation.

Team-Based Care of the Patient Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Guideline-based care of patients requiring extracorporeal membranous oxygenation, a form of life support for patients with refractory respiratory and/or cardiac failure, requires a multidisciplinary approach, yet a detailed description of the ideal integration of teams of physicians, acute care nurse practitioners, critical care nurses, and other disciplines is lacking in the literature.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to define team-based care of the patient receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with an emphasis on the roles of the critical care nurse and the acute care nurse practitioner.

METHODS

A narrative literature review was conducted using the keywords or MeSH terms "team-based care" AND "ECMO" and "nurse practitioner" AND "ECMO." Electronic databases searched included PubMed, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and PsycINFO.

RESULTS

Sixty-five articles met the search criteria, with 21% (n = 10) focusing on characteristics of team-based care for patients receiving ECMO. Articles describe the ideal composition of teams and their education and training, frameworks for the formation of ECMO teams, and aspects of communication. One article details the role of the acute care nurse practitioner in managing ECMO, but several omit or barely describe the nurse's role as a team member.

DISCUSSION

No articles were found that specifically define the key elements, structure, and dynamics of effective team-based care of the patient receiving ECMO. A holistic definition of team-based care of the patient receiving ECMO is proposed. Further research is warranted to correlate aspects of team-based care that optimize patient, team, and organization outcomes.

Clinical outcomes following shock team implementation for cardiogenic shock: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock is a critical cardiac condition characterized by low cardiac output leading to end-organ hypoperfusion and associated with high in-hospital mortality rates. It can manifest following acute myocardial infarction or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure. Despite advancements, mortality rates remain elevated, prompting interest in multidisciplinary approaches to improve outcomes. This manuscript presents a review focused on the concept of a cardiogenic shock team and its potential impact on patient management and outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed on March 19, 2023, covering PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We included primary studies (prospective and retrospective) only and evaluated their quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023440354).

RESULTS

Six relevant studies with 2066 cardiogenic shock patients were included, of which 1071 were managed by shock teams and 995 received standard care. Findings from the reviewed studies indicated the favorable outcomes associated with implementing cardiogenic shock teams. Patients managed by these teams exhibited higher 30-day and in-hospital survival rates compared to those without team intervention. The implementation of cardiogenic shock teams was linked to reduced in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality rates. Additionally, shock team involvement was associated with shorter door-to-balloon times.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that cardiogenic shock teams play a crucial role in improving patient outcomes through earlier detection and timely interventions. Despite challenges in team implementation, their potential to reduce mortality and improve efficiency in patient care warrants further research and greater integration of multidisciplinary strategies into clinical practice.

Arterial Complications Assessed by Duplex Ultrasound After Decannulation of Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Vascular complications are common and can be fatal even after successful decannulation in patients with peripherally cannulated veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Therefore, we aimed to accurately determine the incidence of arterial complications assessed by Duplex ultrasound following peripheral VA-ECMO decannulation. In addition, we investigated the predictors of severe complications requiring intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,350 adult patients who underwent ECMO between January 2012 and April 2023. Of 839 patients treated with peripherally cannulated VA-ECMO, 596 were successfully weaned off and 212 underwent Duplex ultrasound for final analysis. The primary outcome was arterial complications requiring vascular intervention. Thirty-three (15.6%) patients experienced such complications after decannulation. Acute limb ischemia due to thrombotic occlusion was the most common complication, occurring in 23 (10.8%) patients, followed by stenosis (3.8%), pseudoaneurysm (3.8%), arteriovenous fistula (0.9%), and dissection (0.9%). No significant differences in complication rates were found between the percutaneous and surgical decannulation groups in the propensity score-matched population (12.7% vs. 15.9%, respectively; P=0.799). Multivariable analysis revealed disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; odds ratio 2.6; 95% confidence interval 1.17-5.69; P=0.019) as the only predictor of arterial complications after decannulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial complications requiring vascular intervention frequently occur following successful weaning from VA-ECMO regardless of the decannulation strategy. In this setting, DIC appears to be associated with an increased rate of arterial complications.

Multidisciplinary Care Teams in Acute Cardiovascular Care: A Review of Composition, Logistics, Outcomes, Training, and Future Directions

As cardiovascular care continues to advance and with an aging population with higher comorbidities, the epidemiology of the cardiac intensive care unit has undergone a paradigm shift. There has been increasing emphasis on the development of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) for providing holistic care to complex critically ill patients, analogous to heart teams for chronic cardiovascular care. Outside of cardiovascular medicine, MDTs in critical care medicine focus on implementation of guideline-directed care, prevention of iatrogenic harm, communication with patients and families, point-of-care decision-making, and the development of care plans. MDTs in acute cardiovascular care include physicians from cardiovascular medicine, critical care medicine, interventional cardiology, cardiac surgery, and advanced heart failure, in addition to nonphysician team members. In this document, we seek to describe the changes in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit, health care delivery, composition, logistics, outcomes, training, and future directions for MDTs involved in acute cardiovascular care. As a part of the comprehensive review, we performed a scoping of concepts of MDTs, acute hospital care, and cardiovascular conditions and procedures.

Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides key information about cardiogenic shock (CS) teams, including published evidence and practical recommendations to create a CS team and program.

RECENT FINDINGS

CS is a complex disease process with a high in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 30% to 70% according to recent registries and randomized studies. The explanation for the elevated rates is likely multifactorial, including the various etiologies of cardiogenic shock as well as delays in recognition and deployment of appropriate therapies. Accordingly, the use of cardiogenic shock team has been implemented with the aim of improving outcomes in these patients. The CS team typically consists of members with critical care or cardiac critical care expertise, heart failure, cardiothoracic surgery, and interventional cardiology. A number of retrospective studies have now supported the benefits of a CS team, particularly in selecting the appropriate candidates for tailored mechanical circulatory support therapies and providing interventions in a timely manner, which have translated into improved outcomes.

SUMMARY

CS teams provides a platform for expedited recognition of CS and timely, standardized, and multidisciplinary discussions regarding appropriate management and care.

Clinical significance of residual ischaemia in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

AIMS

Although culprit-only revascularization during the index procedure has been recommended in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), the reduction in residual ischaemia is also emphasized to improve clinical outcomes. However, few data are available about the significance of residual ischaemia in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory supports. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of residual ischaemia on clinical outcomes in patients with AMI undergoing venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AMI with multivessel disease who underwent VA-ECMO due to refractory CS were pooled from the RESCUE and SMC-ECMO registries. The included patients were classified into three groups according to residual ischaemia evaluated using the residual Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (rSS): rSS = 0, 0 < rSS ≤ 8, and rSS > 8. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause death. A total of 408 patients were classified into the rSS = 0 (n = 100, 24.5%), 0 < rSS ≤ 8 (n = 136, 33.3%), and rSS > 8 (n = 172, 42.2%) groups. The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome differed significantly according to rSS (33.9 vs. 55.4 vs. 66.1% for rSS = 0, 0 < rSS ≤ 8, and rSS > 8, respectively, overall P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, rSS was independently associated with the risk of 1-year all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.05, P = 0.003). Conversely, the baseline SYNTAX score was not associated with the risk of the primary outcome. Furthermore, when patients were stratified by rSS, the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the high and low delta SYNTAX score groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AMI with refractory CS who underwent VA-ECMO, residual ischaemia was associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of revascularization strategies to minimize residual ischaemia in patients with CS supported with VA-ECMO.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

REtrospective and Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Clinical oUtcomes and Efficacy of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Korean Patients With Cardiogenic Shock (RESCUE), NCT02985008.

Early temporary mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: Real-life data from a regional cardiac assistance network

BACKGROUND

Temporary mechanical circulatory support as well as multidisciplinary team approach in a regional care organization might improve survival of cardiogenic shock. No study has evaluated the relative effect of each temporary mechanical circulatory support on mortality in the context of a regional network.

METHODS

Prospective observational data were retrieved from patients consecutively admitted with cardiogenic shock to the intensive care units in 3 centers organized into a regional cardiac assistance network. Temporary mechanical circulatory support indication was decided by a heart team, based on the initial shock severity or if shock was refractory to medical treatment within 24 hours of admission. A propensity score for circulatory support use was used as an adjustment co-variable to emulate a target trial. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-six patients were included in the study (median age: 59.5 years, 71.9% male): 121 received early mechanical assistance. The main etiologies were acute myocardial infraction (46.8%) and decompensated heart failure (27.2%). Patients who received early mechanical assistance had more severe conditions than other patients. Their crude in-hospital mortality was 38% and 22.4% in other patients but adjusted in-hospital mortality was not different (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI:0.65-1.26). Patients with mechanical assistance had a higher rate of complications than others with longer Intensive Care Unit and hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

In the conditions of a cardiac assistance regional network, in-hospital mortality was not improved by early mechanical assistance implantation. A high incidence of complications of temporary mechanical circulatory support may have jeopardized its potential benefit.

Association of Argatroban Dose With Coagulation Laboratory Test in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Activated Clotting Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time

BACKGROUND

Only some studies have directly compared and analyzed the roles of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) in coagulation monitoring during argatroban administration.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the correlation of argatroban dose with ACT and aPTT values and to identify the optimal coagulation test for argatroban dose adjustment.

METHODS

We evaluated 55 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) who received argatroban for more than 72 hours. The correlation between argatroban dose and aPTT and ACT values was evaluated. To compare argatroban dose and bleeding events according to liver dysfunction, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin.

RESULTS

Among the 55 patients, a total of 459 doses and coagulation tests were evaluated. The aPTT and ACT values showed a weak correlation with argatroban dose, with the Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.261 (P < 0.001) and 0.194 (P = 0.001), respectively. The agreement between the target 150 to 180 seconds for ACT and 55 to 75 seconds for aPTT was observed in 140 patients (46.1%). Twenty-four patients (43.6%) had liver dysfunction when they started argatroban. The median argatroban dose was lower in the liver dysfunction group than in the control group (0.094 mcg/kg/min vs 0.169 mcg/kg/min, P = 0.020). Difference was not observed between the 2 groups in the amount of red blood cell (0.47 vs 0.43 pack, P = 0.909) and platelet (0.60 vs 0.08 pack, P = 0.079) transfusion per day.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

A weak correlation was observed between argatroban dose and the aPTT and ACT values. However, the agreement between aPTT and ACT was only 46.1% regarding the scope of target range. Further research is necessary to determine how to assess the optimal argatroban dose for patients administered argatroban while undergoing ECMO at the intensive care unit.

One-Year Survival for Developing Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients with AMI Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Objective

The incidence of cardiogenic shock cases treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support has been on the rise. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant complication of cardiogenic shock and a frequent serious complication in patients requiring ECMO-supported therapy. AKI is strongly associated with unfavorable patient prognosis. However, there is a paucity of data on the influence of AKI on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) who are receiving ECMO support, particularly with regard to long-term outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 103 patients in the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region from January 2017 and June 2022. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria. Cox regression and logistic regression were used to identify risk factors.

Results

In this study, the incidence of AKI was 63.11%, with AKI stage 1, 2, and 3 accounting for 21.36%, 12.62%, and 29.13%, respectively. Patients with severe AKI had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (43.33% vs 27.40%, P < 0.001), 30-day mortality (60.00% vs 31.51%, P = 0.001), and 1-year mortality (63.67% vs 34.25%, P<0.001) than those without severe AKI. Furthermore, severe AKI significantly increased the risk of one-year mortality (HR 10.816, CI 3.118-37.512, P<0.001). Baseline serum creatinine, baseline platelet, and active cardiopulmonary resuscitation were independent predictors of one-year mortality. In addition, baseline white blood cell count, baseline aspartate aminotransferase, baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT), baseline serum creatinine, preoperative lactate, and postoperative mean arterial pressure were independent risk factors of severe AKI during hospitalization.

Conclusion

In patients with AMI-CS receiving ECMO support, AKI is highly prevalent. Development of severe AKI significantly increased the risk of one-year mortality.

Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analyses

Impella and VA-ECMO are two possible therapeutic courses for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). The study aims to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analyses of a comprehensive set of clinical and socio-economic outcomes observed when using Impella or VA-ECMO with patients under CS. A systematic literature review was performed in Medline, and Web of Science databases on 21 February 2022. Nonoverlapping studies with adult patients supported for CS with Impella or VA-ECMO were searched. Study designs including RCTs, observational studies, and economic evaluations were considered. Data on patient characteristics, type of support, and outcomes were extracted. Additionally, meta-analyses were performed on the most relevant and recurring outcomes, and results shown using forest plots. A total of 102 studies were included, 57% on Impella, 43% on VA-ECMO. The most common outcomes investigated were mortality/survival, duration of support, and bleeding. Ischemic stroke was lower in patients treated with Impella compared to the VA-ECMO population, with statistically significant difference. Socio-economic outcomes including quality of life or resource use were not reported in any study. The study highlighted areas where further data collection is needed to clarify the value of complex, new technologies in the treatment of CS that will enable comparative assessments focusing both on the health impact on patient outcomes and on the financial burden for government budgets. Future studies need to fill the gap to comply with recent regulatory updates at the European and national levels.

Favorable Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach on Heart Transplantation Outcomes in a Mid-Volume Center

Although a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is recommended for advanced heart failure and heart transplantation (HTx), no studies have investigated the impact of the team approach on post-HTx survival. Thus, we implemented an MDT approach in our HTx program in 2014, with the active involvement of critical care and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) teams and the use of a real-time online information sharing system. We hypothesized that this MDT approach would result in improved survival of patients who had undergone HTx. We enrolled 250 adult patients who underwent HTx between December 2003 and June 2018. They were divided into non-MDT (n = 120; before 2014) and MDT (n = 130; since 2014) groups. The primary outcome was overall mortality. In terms of donor age, diabetes, dialysis, ECLS, and waiting time, the MDT group had more high-risk patients. The MDT approach was found to be an independent predictor of overall survival using a variety of multivariable analytic methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. An HF team, a critical care team, and an ECLS team collaboration may improve survival following HTx. To improve the efficiency of the MDT approach, we recommend using a real-time online information sharing system.

Establishing a New ECMO Referral Center Using an ICU-Based Approach: A Feasibility and Safety Study

Background: A high-volume center with a multidisciplinary team is regarded as the optimal place for providing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We hypothesize that an ECMO center can also be successfully created and subsequently developed entirely by intensivists in a mid-size mixed intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: A model was created for setting up a new ECMO referral center within the structure of an existing mixed ICU in a tertiary hospital. A retrospective analysis was carried out of the first 33 patients treated in the initial period of the center’s activity, from mid 2018 to the end of 2020. Results: An ECMO center was established and developed entirely based on the resources of an existing mixed ICU. Thirty-three patients were treated. They had an overall survival rate at 90 days of 60.6%. In veno-venous (VV) mode ECMO duration, ICU length of stay, and SOFA score were significantly higher than in veno-arterial mode. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between survivors and non-survivors on VV-ECMO. Conclusions: A regional ECMO center can be set up as an integral part of a mixed ICU in a tertiary hospital. Extracorporeal therapy, such as continuous renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation can be managed entirely by intensivists. Further studies are needed to show that the ICU-based approach to setting up a new ECMO center is no less effective than the multidisciplinary approach.

Similarities in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management across intensive care unit types in the United States: An analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in the United States occurs often in cardiothoracic ICUs (CTICU). It is unknown how it varies across ICU types.

METHODS

We identified 10,893 ECMO runs from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry across 2018 and 2019. Primary outcome was ECMO case volume by ICU type (CTICU vs. non-CTICU). Adjusting for pre-ECMO characteristics and case mix, secondary outcomes were on-ECMO physiologic variables by ICU location stratified by support type.

RESULTS

CTICU ECMO occurred in 65.1% and 55.1% (2018 and 2019) of total runs. A minority of total runs related to cardiac surgery procedures (CTICU: 21.7% [2018], 18% [2019]; non-CTICU: 11.2% [2018], 13% [2019]). After multivariate adjustment, non-CTICU ECMO for cardiac support associated with lower 4- and 24-hour circuit flow (3.9 liters per minute [LPM] vs. 4.1 LPM, p<0.0001; 4.1 LPM vs. 4.3 LPM, p<0.0001); for respiratory support, lower on-ECMO mean fraction of inspired oxygen ([F_i O₂ ], 67% versus 69%, p=0.02) and lower respiratory rate (14 versus 15, p<0.0001); and, for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), lower ECMO flow rates at 24 hours (3.5 liters per minute [LPM] versus 3.7 LPM, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO mostly remains in CTICUs though a minority is associated with cardiac surgery. Statistically significant but clinically minor differences in on-ECMO metrics were observed across ICU types.

Complications related to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with acute myocardial infarction: VA-ECMO complications in AMI

BACKGROUND

Among various mechanical support devices, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) is the last resort for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients complicated with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study was to investigate the V-A ECMO-related complications in AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to find the association between complications and in-hospital death in that population.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 101 AMI patients who received V-A ECMO and underwent PCI to the culprit lesion, and divided them into the survivor group (n=43) and the in-hospital death group (n=58). We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes including complications between the 2 groups, and performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to find factors associated with in-hospital death and major bleeding.

RESULTS

The incidence of major bleeding including V-A ECMO site bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage was higher in the in-hospital death group (34.5%) than in the survivor group (7%) (p=0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2 (OR 4.453, 95% CI1.427-13.894, p=0.010) and major bleeding (OR 4.986, 95% CI1.277-19.466, p=0.021) were significantly associated with in-hospital death. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) was significantly associated with major bleeding (OR 3.881, 95% CI 1.358-11.089, p=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

In AMI patients who received V-A ECMO and underwent PCI, final TIMI flow grade ≤2 and major bleeding were associated with in-hospital death. OHCA was closely associated with major bleeding.

Association between a Multidisciplinary Team Approach and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite recent improvements in advanced life support, the overall survival rate after cardiac arrest remains low. We aimed to examine the association of a multidisciplinary team approach with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study included 125 patients who underwent ECPR in the ED between May 2004-December 2018. In January 2014, our institution implemented a multidisciplinary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) team. Eligible patients were classified into pre-ECMO-team (n=65) and post-ECMO-team (n=60) groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality (72.3% vs. 58.3%, p=0.102) and poor neurological outcomes (78.5% vs. 68.3%, p=0.283) did not differ significantly between the pre- and post-ECMO-team groups. However, among the 60 patients who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest, in-hospital mortality (75.8% vs. 40.7%, p=0.006) and poor neurological outcomes (78.8% vs. 48.1%, p=0.015) significantly decreased after the multidisciplinary team formation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the multidisciplinary team approach (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.61; p=0.005) was an independent prognostic factor for in-hospital mortality in in-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary team approach was associated with improved clinical outcomes in in-hospital cardiac arrest patients undergoing ECPR in the ED. These findings may help in improving the selection criteria for ECPR in the ED. Further studies to overcome the study limitations may help improving the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Predictors of Mortality in Patients Treated with Veno-Arterial ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mortality for patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains high. This meta-analysis aims to identify factors that predict higher risk of mortality after VA-ECMO for AMI.

METHODS

We meta-analyzed mortality after VA-ECMO for CS complicating AMI and the effect of factors from systematically selected studies published after 2009.

RESULTS

72 studies (10,276 patients) were included with a pooled mortality estimate of 58 %. With high confidence in estimates, failure to achieve TIMI III flow and left main culprit were identified as factors associated with higher mortality. With low-moderate confidence, older age, high BMI, renal dysfunction, increasing lactate, prothrombin activity < 50%, VA-ECMO implantation after revascularization, and non-shockable ventricular arrythmias were identified as factors associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

These results provide clinicians with a framework for selecting patients for VA-ECMO for CS complicating AMI.

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Team Approach on Extracorporeal Circulatory Life Support-Bridged Heart Transplantation

Background

The number of heart transplantations (HTx) is increasing annually. Due to advances in medical and surgical support, the outcomes of HTx are also improving. Extracorporeal circulatory life support (ECLS) provides patients with decompensated heart failure a chance to undergo HTx. A medical approach involving collaboration among experienced experts in different fields should improve the outcomes and prognosis of ECLS-bridged HTx.

Methods

From December 2003 to December 2018, 1,465 patients received ECLS at Samsung Medical Center. We excluded patients who had not undergone HTx or underwent repeated transplantations. Patients younger than 18 years were excluded. We also excluded patients who received an implantable durable left ventricular assist device before HTx. In total, 91 patients were included in this study. A multidisciplinary team approach began in March 2013 at our hospital. We divided the patients into 2 groups depending on whether they were treated before or after implementation of the team approach.

Results

The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the pre-ECLS team group than in the post-ECLS team group (n=5, 18.5% vs. n=2, 3.1%; p=0.023). The 1-year survival rate was better in the post-ECLS team group than in the pre-ECLS team group (n=57, 89.1% vs. n=19, 70.4%; p=0.023).

Conclusion

We found that implementing a multidisciplinary team approach improved the outcomes of ECLS-bridged HTx. Team-based care should be adapted at HTx centers that perform high-risk HTx.