Comparative effectiveness of physical activity interventions and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

A Real-World Study on the Short-Term Efficacy of Amlodipine in Treating Hypertension Among Inpatients

Purpose

Hospitalized hypertensive patients rely on blood pressure medication, yet there is limited research on the sole use of amlodipine, despite its proven efficacy in protecting target organs and reducing mortality. This study aims to identify key indicators influencing the efficacy of amlodipine, thereby enhancing treatment outcomes.

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, 870 hospitalized patients with primary hypertension exclusively received amlodipine for the first 5 days after admission, and their medical records contained comprehensive blood pressure records. They were categorized into success (n=479) and failure (n=391) groups based on average blood pressure control efficacy. Predictive models were constructed using six machine learning algorithms. Evaluation metrics encompassed the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis assessed feature contributions to efficacy.

Results

All six machine learning models demonstrated superior predictive performance. Following variable reduction, the model predicting amlodipine efficacy was reconstructed using these algorithms, with the light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model achieving the highest overall performance (AUC = 0.803). Notably, amlodipine showed enhanced efficacy in patients with low platelet distribution width (PDW) values, as well as high hematocrit (HCT) and thrombin time (TT) values.

Conclusion

This study utilized machine learning to predict amlodipine's effectiveness in hypertension treatment, pinpointing key factors: HCT, PDW, and TT levels. Lower PDW, along with higher HCT and TT, correlated with enhanced treatment outcomes. This facilitates personalized treatment, particularly for hospitalized hypertensive patients undergoing amlodipine monotherapy.

Research status and trends of physical activity on depression or anxiety: a bibliometric analysis

Background

Anxiety and depression are prevalent mental disorders. As modern society continues to face mounting pressures, the incidence of anxiety and depression is on the rise. In recent years, there has been an increasing breadth of research exploring the relationship between anxiety, depression, and physical activity (PA). However, the current research progress and future development trends are unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the research hotspots and development trends in this field, and to provide guidance for future studies and to provide some reference for clinicians.

Methods

We searched the relevant literature of Web of Science Core Collection from the establishment of the database to August 15, 2023. CiteSpace, VOSviewer and Bibliometrix Packages based on the R language were used to analyze the number of publications, countries, institutions, journals, authors, references, and keywords.

Results

A total of 1,591 studies were included in the analysis, and the research in the field of PA on anxiety or depression has consistently expanded. The USA (304 publications), Harvard University (93 publications), and the journal of affective disorders (97 publications) were the countries, institutions, and journals that published the highest number of articles, respectively. According to the keywords, students and pregnant women, adult neurogenesis, and Tai Chi were the groups of concern, physiological and pathological mechanisms, and the type of PA of interest, respectively.

Conclusion

The study of PA on anxiety or depression is experiencing ongoing expansion. Clinicians can consider advising patients to take mind-body exercise to improve mood. In addition, future researchers can explore the mind-body exercise and its impact on anxiety or depression, PA and anxiety or depression in specific populations, and adult neurogenesis of various exercise in anxiety or depression.

Real-world demographic patterns of users of a digital primary prevention service for diabetes

Rapid urbanization has led to an exponential increase in lifestyle-associated metabolic disorders presenting a huge socioeconomic burden. Waya is a digital prevention program that guides overweight and obese individuals to maintain a healthy lifestyle through exercise, diet, and educational videos.

Objectives and aims

We aimed to study the demographic patterns of the Waya cohort and examine the prevalence of diabetes (the most common lifestyle-associated metabolic disorder) and its risk factors in comparison to the GEDA 2014/2015-European Health Interview Survey population.

Methods

Waya participants who registered by 1 October 2020 and who answered at least one health survey question were included in this study. Factors such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes between the two populations were compared using Chi-square test.

Results

Of the 837 participants, 86.1% were women. The proportion of obese participants was higher in Waya than in the German Health Update (GEDA) cohort (women: 39.4% vs. 18%, P < 0.05; men: 37.1% vs. 18.3%, P < 0.05), whereas the proportion of participants with hypertension (women: 12.1% vs. 30.9% in GEDA, P < 0.05; men: 22.4% vs. 32.8% in GEDA, P < 0.05) was lower. The proportion of women with diabetes was low in our cohort (3.9% vs. 7% in GEDA, P < 0.05); however, the proportion of men with diabetes remained the same between the two groups. We observed significant differences between the GEDA and Waya cohorts due to changes in the prevalence pattern over time or target bias of the digital program.

Conclusion

These findings showcase the usability of Waya in collecting real-world insights, which will be beneficial in monitoring the prevalence of chronic metabolic disorders and associated risk factors over time.

Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention for congenital heart disease in children: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of nursing interventions (e.g., educational and empathic interviewing, motor exercise, therapeutic play interventions) on the perioperative outcome of children with congenital heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, EBSCO, The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data and the VIP Chinese Journal Service platform from the date of database creation to August 2021. Our study adhered to the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 16.0 were used to complete the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis showed that comprehensive nursing intervention reduced both the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.982, 95%CI [-2.329, -1.634], P < .001) and the related risk of post-operative complications [OR = 0.345, 95%CI (0.225, 0.528), P < .001]. In addition, nursing intervention increased parental satisfaction with the care provided [OR = 0.308, 95%CI (1.923, 6.863), P < .001]. Nursing interventions have also had a positive impact in reducing preoperative anxiety [WMD = -6.721, 95% CI (-7.194, -6.249), P < .001] and postoperative pain [WMD = -7.103, 95% CI (-7.103, -7.663), P < .001] in children.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis confirms the beneficial effects of comprehensive nursing interventions in terms of reduced complication rates and shorter hospital stays. The effectiveness of comprehensive nursing in reducing anxiety and pain levels was also demonstrated. The findings support the implementation of comprehensive care interventions in the perioperative period for children with CHD to improve clinical outcomes.

Risk of Hypertension and Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in the Physically Active Population under-70 Years Old—Spanish Health Survey

Introduction: Reducing the prevalence of hypertension is a major priority of the World Health Organization (WHO). Its high prevalence and associated risks generate high economic and social costs. Physical activity (PA) is associated with a decrease in hypertension and in the use of antihypertensive drugs. Objective: To explore the association between PA levels (PAL), prevalence of hypertension and the use of antihypertensive drugs in Spanish population. To calculate risks of hypertension and use of antihypertensive in the inactive versus physically active population. Method: This cross-sectional study used data from 17717 individuals, sampled in the 2017 National Health Survey. Interaction by sex, age groups, body mass index (BMI), hypertension prevalence, antihypertensive drugs use and PAL, using a pairwise z-test, and dependence relationships between variables, were studied using a chi square test. Odds ratios of hypertension and antihypertensive drug use were calculated among the inactive and the physically active populations. Results: The findings showed a significant inverse association between prevalence of hypertension, antihypertensive use, and PAL in both sexes and different age and BMI groups, with lower prevalence of hypertension and antihypertensive use when PAL were higher. The risks of hypertension and antihypertensive use seems to be reduced when related to higher PAL compared to inactive people. Conclusions: High PAL is associated with lower prevalence of hypertension and lower antihypertensive use. Thus, being physically active or very active may reduce the risks of suffering from hypertension and the need to use antihypertensives compared to inactive people or walkers.

Blood Pressure in Patients with Arterial Hypertension and Overweight or Obesity During Office Measurement and Daily Monitoring

Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. More than 1.5 billion people suffer from hypertension. According to official statistics, in Ukraine in 2021 more than 13 million patients with AH were registered, and annually this disease is detected in 1 million Ukrainians. The objective: to determine the levels of blood pressure (BP) in overweighted or obese patients with AH who use antihypertensive drugs during office measurement and 24-hours monitoring of BP. Materials and methods. The study analyzed the results of treatment of 395 overweighted or obese patients (139 women and 236 men) with essential AH. All patients received antihypertensive treatment for at least 3 months before study start. Patients were divided into five groups depending on blood pressure. The control group included 33 age-matched individuals. During the study BP was measured in physician’s office with use of mechanical tonometer with a shoulder cuff and ambulatory 24-hours blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed for all patients. Results. The results of office blood pressure measurement and ABPM were analyzed. Normal BP was detected in 34.7% of patients with AH and high BMI. In 10.9% of patients systolic blood pressure (SBP) remains above 139 mm Hg despite of drug use, in 16.3% of patients the grade 1 AH was diagnosed, in 23.2% – grade 2, and in 14.9% – grade 3 AH was deter mined during office blood pressure measurement. It was found that men are 1.7 times more likely had uncontrolled AH comparing to women. The further analyze of the BP data showed that office BP levels were higher then home. Target blood pressure levels were found in 87% of patients during ABPM, although in the office measurement this figure was 54%, 5% of patients could not withstand the BP monitoring during the day with an automatic device due to pain. No difference in heart rate was determined in study patients by different types of measurement. Conclusions. In patients with AH and high body mass index, office measurement reveals insufficient reduction of blood pressure (BP) in 35% of patients despite of antihypertensive drugs use. At the same time ABPM found target BP achievement in 87% of patients. Thus, ABPM should be performed in overweighted or obese patients with AH before making the decision to increase the antihypertensive drug dose to avoid possible undesirable BP decrease.

Exercise versus fixed-dose combination therapy for cardiovascular risk factors control and atherosclerotic disease prevention: a network meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Despite the consistent evidence of the benefits of physical activity on preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) and some cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia, the prescription of drugs remains the most widely used approach to prevent ASCVD in clinical settings. The purpose of this study protocol is to provide a meta-synthesis methodology for comparing the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy and physical exercise on controlling cardiovascular risk factors and preventing ASCVD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We plan to conduct a computerised search in Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and SPORTDiscus from inception to May 2020 for studies testing the effectiveness of physical exercise or fixed-dose combination drug therapy in preventing ASCVD, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and controlling some cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension and dyslipidaemia). Since performing network meta-analyses (NMA) is a statistical approach that allows direct and indirect comparisons of interventions, where sufficient studies are included, we plan to perform the following NMA comparing the effect of fixed-dose combination therapy and physical exercise interventions on (1) improving lipid profile, (2) reducing blood pressure, (3) preventing cardiovascular events and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and (4) improving compliance with the therapeutic strategy and reducing adverse events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be needed because data included in the NMA will be extracted from published trials that meet accepted ethical standards. The results will be published in academic peer-reviewed journals, and the evidence gathered by this project could be included in the preventive cardiovascular disease guidelines.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019122794.

Comparative efficacy of exercise and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: A network meta-analysis

Aims

This analysis aims to estimate the comparative efficacy of anti-hypertensive medications and exercise interventions on systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction in people with hypertension.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted focusing on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions and first-line anti-hypertensives where blood pressure reduction was the primary outcome in those with hypertension. Network meta-analyses were conducted to generate estimates of comparative efficacy.

Results

We identified 93 RCTs ( N = 32,404, mean age in RCTs: 39–70 years) which compared placebo or usual care with first-line antihypertensives including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers and thiazide-like diuretics and exercise interventions including aerobic training and dynamic resistance training. Of these, there were 81 (87%) trials related to medications ( n = 31,347, 97%) and 12 (13%) trials related to exercise ( n = 1057, 3%). The point estimates suggested that antihypertensive medications were more effective than exercise but there was insufficient evidence to suggest that first-line medications significantly reduced blood pressure to a greater extent than did the exercise interventions. Of the first-line treatments, angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers had the highest treatment ranking, while exercise had the second lowest treatment ranking, followed by control conditions.

Conclusion

The current evidence base with a bias towards medication research may partly explain the circumspection around the efficacy of exercise in guidelines and practice. Clinicians may justifiably consider exercise for low risk hypertension patients who confirm a preference for such an approach.