Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice

Implementation of nutritional screening tools, nutritional assessment tools, and diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in convalescent rehabilitation wards: A nationwide survey

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The utilization of recommended nutritional assessment measures in rehabilitation settings remains unclear. This study explored methods for identifying nutritional disorders using data from a nationwide survey conducted in convalescent rehabilitation wards.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed the annual survey, including methods for identifying malnutrition, the risk of malnutrition, and overnutrition in Kaifukuki (convalescent) rehabilitation wards. Methods identifying malnutrition and risk of malnutrition were grouped into nutritional screening tools (NSTs), nutritional assessment tools (NATs), diagnostic criteria for malnutrition (DCM), and suboptimal methods (e.g., hypoalbuminemia). NSTs, NATs, and DCM were further categorized as "acceptable tools." The association between applying acceptable tools, hospital-based data (e.g., the number of beds), and ward-based data (e.g., assessor for nutritional status) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis with multiple imputations.

RESULTS

In total, 885 hospitals with Kaifukuki rehabilitation wards responded to the survey, and 754 hospitals were included in the analysis. Registered dietitians assessed the nutritional status in 88% of the hospitals, whereas other professionals (e.g., nurses) evaluated the nutritional status in the remainder. NSTs (e.g., Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form), NATs (e.g., Subjective Global Assessment), DCM (e.g., Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria), and suboptimal tools were used in 13.1%, 5.4%, 4.8%, and 74.6% of cases, respectively. Most hospitals used acceptable measures (e.g., body mass index) for overnutrition (91.2%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that assessments by registered dietitians (adjusted odds ratio[OR]: 2.20.95% confidence interval[CI]: 1.09-4.45) and hospital-owned food services, a proxy for limited clinical practice time of dietitians, were associated with a low likelihood of implementing acceptable measures (adjusted OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.43-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable malnutrition measures, including the NSTs, NATs, and DCM, have not been widely applied in convalescent rehabilitation settings. The implementation of recommended tools for identifying malnutrition may be promoted when registered dietitians assess the patients' nutritional status.

A survey of preoperative surgical nutrition practices, opinions, and barriers across Canada

Malnutrition is prevalent among surgical candidates and associated with adverse outcomes. Despite being potentially modifiable, malnutrition risk screening is not a standard preoperative practice. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to understand healthcare professionals' (HCPs) opinions and barriers regarding screening and treatment of malnutrition. HCPs working with adult surgical patients in Canada were invited to complete an online survey. Barriers to preoperative malnutrition screening were assessed using the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour model. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analyzed using summative content analysis. Of the 225 HCPs surveyed (n = 111 dietitians, n = 72 physicians, n = 42 allied HCPs), 96%-100% agreed that preoperative malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor associated with worse surgical outcomes and is a treatment priority. Yet, 65% (n = 142/220; dietitians: 88% vs. physicians: 40%) reported screening for malnutrition, which mostly occured in the postoperative period (n = 117) by dietitians (n = 94). Just 42% (48/113) of non-dietitian respondents referred positively screened patients to a dietitian for further assessment and treatment. The most prevalent barriers for malnutrition screening were related to opportunity, including availability of resources (57%, n = 121/212), time (40%, n = 84/212) and support from others (38%, n = 80/212). In conclusion, there is a gap between opinion and practice among surgical HCPs pertaining to malnutrition. Although HCPs agreed malnutrition is a surgical priority, the opportunity to screen for nutrition risk was a great barrier.

Three-Stage Nutrition Diagnosis for surgical patients at the perioperative period

Medical nutrition therapy has been widely applied in various diseases as a fundamental or even a first-line treatment. Patient who undergoes a disease state especially at the perioperative period can be much improved with the help of nutrition therapy. Precise nutrition diagnosis should be conducted before applying any nutrition therapy. Traditional malnutrition diagnostic process, however, is a two-stage process (nutrition screening and nutrition assessment) which cannot precisely assess nutritional status of surgical patients or the consequences of being malnourished. This article systematically introduced a new nutrition diagnostic process - Three-Stage Diagnosis (nutrition screening, nutrition assessment, and comprehensive evaluation) and discussed its applications during perioperative period.

Postoperative nutrition in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes

Patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer are at high risk of developing or worsening malnutrition and sarcopenia. In malnourished patients, preoperative nutritional support may not be sufficient and so postoperative support is advised. This narrative review addresses several aspects of postoperative nutritional care in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes. Early oral feeding, therapeutic diet, oral nutritional supplements, immunonutrition, and probiotics are discussed. When postoperative intake is insufficient, nutritional support favouring the enteral route is recommended. Whether this approach should use a nasojejunal tube or jejunostomy is still a matter of debate. In the setting of enhanced recovery programmes with early discharge, nutritional follow-up and care should be continued beyond the short time in hospital. In enhanced recovery programmes, the main specific aspects of nutrition are patient education, early oral intake, and post-discharge care. The other aspects do not differ from conventional care.

Impact of nutrition on skin wound healing and aesthetic outcomes: A comprehensive narrative review

Background

While current wound treatment strategies often focus on antimicrobials and topical agents, the role of nutrition in wound healing and aesthetic outcomes is crucial but frequently overlooked. This review assesses the impact of specific nutrients and preoperative nutritional status on surgical outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, from the inception of the study to October 2023. The study focused on the influence of macronutrients and micronutrients on aesthetic outcomes, the optimization of preoperative nutritional status, and the association between nutritional status and postoperative complications. Inclusion criteria were English language peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials related to the impact of nutrition on skin wound healing and aesthetic outcomes. Exclusion criteria included non-English publications, non-peer-reviewed articles, opinion pieces, and animal studies.

Results

Omega-3 fatty acids and specific amino acids were linked to enhanced wound-healing and immune function. Vitamins A, B, and C and zinc positively influenced healing stages, while vitamin E showed variable results. Polyphenolic compounds showed anti-inflammatory effects beneficial for recovery. Malnutrition was associated with increased postoperative complications and infections, whereas preoperative nutritional support correlated with reduced hospital stays and complications.

Conclusion

Personalized nutritional plans are essential in surgical care, particularly for enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Despite the demonstrated benefits of certain nutrients, gaps in research, particularly regarding elements such as iron, necessitate further studies. Nutritional assessments and interventions are vital for optimal preoperative care, underscoring the need for more comprehensive guidelines and research in nutritional management for surgical patients.

Nutritional risk predicts postoperative complications and length of stay, whereas sarcopenia risk predicts need for step-down care in a mixed elective surgery population

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition and poor functional reserves place patients at risk for negative surgical outcomes. In this prospective study we aimed to measure preoperative nutritional and sarcopenia risk and evaluate their impact on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Adults scheduled to undergo elective general and gastrointestinal surgery were screened for nutrition risk using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool screening tool. Sarcopenia risk was measured using the SARC-F tool and hand-grip strength. Patients were followed postoperatively. Incidence of complications, length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, and need for step-down care were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients were included. Mean age was 53.8 years (standard deviation [SD] 16.44). Sixty-six (54%) were scheduled for day-case procedures, and 56 (46%) for nonday-case procedures. About 18.9% (n = 23) were at nutritional risk preoperatively. Ten patients (8.2%) had probable sarcopenia based on SARC-F, whereas seven (5.7%) had measurably reduced HG. Incidence of postoperative complications was 23.8% (n = 29). Nutrition risk was associated with the development of complications (p = 0.018). In the nonday-case group, nutritional risk was associated with greater LOS (p = 0.013). Older age was associated with need for step-down care (p = 0.002) as was SARC-F (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative nutritional screening can predict postoperative complications and LOS, whereas sarcopenia screening is predictive of the need for step-down care after discharge. Screening tools are quick and inexpensive and could provide valuable information to clinicians and allow patients the opportunity to enhance their physical preparedness for surgery thereby mitigating their risk for negative surgical outcomes.

Identifying malnutrition in emergency general surgery: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Emergency general surgery practice is high risk. Surgery is a key part of treatment, with resultant catabolic stress and frequent need for nutritional support. The aim of this study was to examine the current methods of defining and determining malnutrition in emergency general surgery. This included examining the use of nutrition screening and assessment tools and other measures of malnutrition.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, trial registries, and relevant journals published between January 2000 and January 2022 were searched for studies of adult patients with any emergency general surgery diagnosis, managed conservatively or operatively, with an assessment of nutritional status. Mixed populations were included if more than 50 per cent of patients were emergency general surgery patients or emergency general surgery results could be separately extracted. Studies in which patients had received nutritional support were excluded. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021285897).

RESULTS

From 6700 studies screened, 324 full texts were retrieved and 31 were included in the analysis. A definition of malnutrition was provided in 23 studies (75 per cent), with nutritional status being determined by a variety of methods. A total of seven nutrition screening tools and a total of nine 'assessment' tools were reported. To define malnutrition, the most commonly used primary or secondary marker of nutritional status was BMI, followed by albumin level.

CONCLUSION

Wide variation exists in approaches to identify malnutrition risk in emergency general surgery patients, using a range of tools and nutrition markers. Future studies should seek to standardize nutrition screening and assessment in the emergency general surgery setting as two discrete processes. This will permit better understanding of malnutrition risk in surgical patients.

Perioperative complications of legally blind patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A national inpatient sample database study

INTRODUCTION

Vision impairment is a significant health concern that leads to increased morbidity and mortality globally. Significantly, legally blind (LB) patients have higher rates of hospitalization, cost, and orthopedic-related complications. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly used to treat advanced knee osteoarthritis. However, there is limited literature reporting the demographic and hospitalization characteristics and operative outcomes of patients with LB who underwent TKA. This study addresses this gap in literature.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study using a Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. We assessed perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare expenditure among legally blind and control cohort patients who underwent TKA. Propensity matching was conducted to identify factors associated with perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2020, there were 558,371 patients underwent TKA, with 0.1% of patients documented as legally blind. Of this cohort, the average age was significantly older than the control, 70.01 years versus 66.72 years (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients from the LB cohort had a longer length of stay (2.9 ± 1.7 days) than those from the control cohort (2.4 ± 1.3 days) (p < 0.001). Significantly, patients in the legally blind group incurred higher expenditures than those in the control group ($68,936 versus $64,808, respectively; p < 0.001). (Table 2). Propensity matching yields similar results. Analysis of TKA-associated operative complications suggested that legally blind patients had a higher proportion of blood loss anemia (20.97%, p < 0.05), required blood transfusions secondary to surgery (3.1%, p < 0.05), and periprosthetic fractures (2.6%, p < 0.05) than the control group (15.3%, 1.5%, and 0.42%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We report that LB patients are, on average, older and have an extended LOS, higher expenditure, and higher rates of specific TKA-associated operative complications than those without legal blindness. To date, this is the first study of its kind to provide large, population-based data on the demographics, costs, and TKA-operative complications in patients with LB and, as such, provides a purposeful basis for future research.

Baseline assessment of enhanced recovery after pediatric surgery in mainland China

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a clinical pathway that optimizes perioperative management based on evidence-based medicine. ERAS has been gradually introduced to pediatric surgery in recent years. However, there are limited reports on its overall implementation. We aimed to determine the implementation of ERAS in patients who received pediatric surgery in mainland China.

METHODS

We designed a questionnaire involving 17 key ERAS elements and sent the questionnaire to 66 chiefs of pediatric surgery distributed throughout 31 provinces in mainland China to obtain a baseline assessment of the assimilation of ERAS protocols in the care of congenital biliary dilatation (CBD).

RESULTS

A total of 66 questionnaires were collected. The range of elements implemented at participating centers was 4-16, with a mean of 10.23. The least commonly practiced elements were administration of non-opioid preoperative analgesia (6 centers, 9.09%), prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] (9 centers, 13.64%), and postoperative pain management (26 centers, 39.39%).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of elements differed from center to center. Measures relying primarily on anesthesiologists had lower execution. The adherence to ERAS elements was often inhibited by a lack of institutional support, poor knowledge of ERAS protocols, and difficulties in coordinating multidisciplinary care, as well intransigence in changing surgical practices out of fear of liability for poor outcomes.

Nutritional screening in a cancer prehabilitation programme: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients are often malnourished pre-operatively. Study aims were to establish if current screening was appropriate for use in prehabilitation and investigate any association between nutritional risk, functionality and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

This cohort study used routinely collected data from September 2020 to August 2021 from patients in a Prehab4cancer programme. Included patients were aged >18 years, had colorectal, lung or oesophago-gastric cancer and were scheduled for surgery. Nutritional assessment included patient generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) short-form and QoL with a sit-to-stand test. Association between nutritional risk and outcomes were analysed using adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 928 patients referred to Prehab4Cancer service over 12-months, data on nutritional risk were collected from 526 patients. Pre-operatively, 233 out of 526 (44%) patients were at nutritional risk (score ≥2). During prehabilitation, 31% of patients improved their PG-SGA and 74% of patients maintained or improved their weight. Odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) showed that patients with better QoL using EuroQol-5 Dimensions (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01, 0.45, P=0.01), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93, 1.00, p=0.04) or sit-to-stand (OR 0.96, 95% 0.93, 1.00, p=0.04) were less likely to be nutritional at risk.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of patients in Prehab4Cancer programme assessed using PG-SGA were at risk of malnutrition. However, almost half of the sample did not have their risk assessed. Patients at risk of malnutrition were more likely to have a poorer QoL and sit-to-stand test than those who were not at risk. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Unresolved issues in perioperative nutrition: A narrative review

Surgical patients are at an increased risk of negative outcomes if they are malnourished or at risk of malnutrition preoperatively. Optimisation of nutritional status should be a focus throughout the perioperative continuum to promote improved surgical outcomes. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols are increasingly applied in the surgical setting but are not yet widespread. This narrative review focused on areas of perioperative nutrition that are perceived as controversial or are lacking in agreement. A search for available literature was conducted on 1 March 2022 and relevant high-quality articles published since 2015 were considered for inclusion. Most malnutrition screening tools are not specific to the surgical population except for the Perioperative Nutrition Screen (PONS) although more large-scale initiatives are needed to improve the prevalence of preoperative nutrition screening. Poor muscle health is common in patients with malnutrition and further exacerbates negative health outcomes indicating that prevention, detection and treatment is of high importance in this population. Although a lack of consensus remains for who should receive preoperative nutritional therapy, evidence suggests a positive impact on muscle health. Additionally, postoperative nutritional support benefits surgical outcomes, with some patients requiring enteral and/or parenteral feeding routes and showing benefit from immunonutrition. The importance of nutrition extends beyond the time in hospital and should remain a priority post-discharge. The impact of individual or personalised nutrition based on select patient characteristics remains to be further investigated. Overall, the importance of perioperative nutrition is evident in the literature despite select ongoing areas of contention.

Nutrition considerations in pediatric surgical patients

Children who require surgical interventions are subject to physiologic stress, necessitating a period of healing when nutrition needs may temporarily change. Providing appropriate nutrition to children before and after surgery is an important part of minimizing surgical morbidity. There is a clear link between poor nutrition and surgical outcomes, therefore providing good reason for ensuring an appropriate nutrition plan is in place for children requiring surgery. This review will address recent research investigating nutrition considerations for pediatric surgical patients with a focus on practical tools to guide decision making in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.

Perioperative Nutritional Support: A Review of Current Literature

Since the beginning of the practice of surgery, the reduction of postoperative complications and early recovery have been two of the fundamental pillars that have driven the improvement of surgical techniques and perioperative management. Despite great advances in these fields, the rationalization of antibiotic prophylaxis, and other important innovations, postoperative recovery (especially in elderly patients, oncological pathology or digestive or head and neck surgery) is tortuous. This can be explained by several reasons, among which, malnutrition has a major role. Perioperative nutritional support, included within the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol, has proven to be a main element and a critical step to achieve better surgical results. Starting with the preoperative nutritional assessment and treatment in elective surgery, we can improve nutritional status using oral supplements and immunomodulatory formulas. If we add early nutritional support in the postoperative scenario, we are able to significantly reduce infectious complications, need for intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, costs, and mortality. Throughout this review, we will review the latest developments and the available literature.

Pharmacist-led standardization of total parenteral nutrition improves postoperative nutritional status in colorectal cancer patients

Background

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is an essential treatment for patients who undergo abdominal surgery. Due to the gap of knowledge background between clinicians and pharmacists, the participation of the latter may improve TPN standardization. However, the impact on clinical outcome is unknown. In this study, we evaluated the impact of appropriacy and efficacy of TPN prescription, after a pharmacist-led TPN standardization program introduced.

Methods

A pharmacist-led TPN standardization program was introduced in the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital and the clinical outcomes were assessed. The TPN standardization program includes a pre-established standard multidisciplinary evaluation standard, a computerized TPN management system and regular evaluations of TPN prescription performed by pharmacists. Any concerns were identified and improved via discussed with doctors. To evaluate the effect of pharmacists’ intervention in nutritional status and postoperative complications, an observational before-and-after cohort study was performed. All patients admitted in hospital with colorectal cancer (CRC) and receiving abdominal surgery in June 2019 (pre-intervention cohort) and June 2020 (post-intervention cohort) were retrospectively analyzed. Nutritional status of patients was evaluated using the levels of postoperative serum albumin, prealbumin, total protein, and their decrease extent. Surgical or TPN-related complications and recovery time were collated as the clinical outcomes.

Results

There were no significant differences in the basic clinical information of the two cohorts, suggesting that the two groups are comparable. The average postoperative prealbumin levels were elevated in 2020 compared to 2019 (192.3±5.5 mg/L for 2019 and 229.5±4.8 mg/L for 2020, P<0.001). In addition, the post-intervention cohort showed a lower postoperative infection rate (11.6% vs. 18.2%), shorter duration of infection (9.4±1.4 vs. 7.7±1.0 days), lower incidence of postoperative albumin decrease (25.2% vs. 76.7%), prealbumin decrease (71.5% vs. 78.9%), and total protein decrease (25.2% vs. 72.2%), and lower incidence of TPN-related hypoglycemia (5.4% vs. 15.3%).

Conclusions

Pharmacist-led TPN standardization improved the postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).