In vitro and in vivo bactericidal activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with β-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel β-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with β-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of β-lactams with β-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

PAM-1: an antimicrobial peptide with promise against ceftazidime-avibactam resistant Escherichia coli infection

Introduction

Antibiotic misuse and overuse have led to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The global spread of resistance to the novel antibiotic combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is becoming a severe problem. Antimicrobial peptide PAM-1 offers a novel approach for treating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This study explores its antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities and mechanisms against CZA-resistant Escherichia. Coli (E. coli), evaluating its stability and biosafety as well.

Methods

The broth microdilution method, growth curve analysis, crystal violet staining, scanning electron microscopy, and propidium iodide staining/N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine uptake experiments were performed to explore the antibacterial action and potential mechanism of PAM-1 against CZA-resistant E. coli. The biosafety in diverse environments of PAM-1 was evaluated by red blood cell hemolysis, and cytotoxicity tests. Its stability was further assessed under different temperatures, serum concentrations, and ionic conditions using the broth microdilution method to determine its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Galleria mellonella infection model and RT-qPCR were used to investigate the in vivo antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects.

Results and discussion

In vitro antibacterial experiments demonstrated that the MICs of PAM-1 ranged from 2 to 8 μg/mL, with its effectiveness sustained for a duration of 24 h. PAM-1 exhibited significant antibiofilm activities against CZA-resistant E. coli (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Membrane permeability test revealed that PAM-1 may exert its antibacterial effect by disrupting membrane integrity by forming transmembrane pores (p < 0.05). Red blood cell hemolysis and cytotoxicity tests revealed that PAM-1 exerts no adverse effects at experimental concentrations (p < 0.05). Moreover, stability tests revealed its effectiveness in serum and at room temperature. The Galleria mellonella infection model revealed that PAM-1 can significantly improve the survival rate of Galleria mellonella (>50%)for in vivo treatment. Lastly, RT-qPCR revealed that PAM-1 downregulates the expression of inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.05). Overall, our study findings highlight the potential of PAM-1 as a therapeutic agent for CZA-resistant E. coli infections, offering new avenues for research and alternative antimicrobial therapy strategies.

Antimicrobials: An update on new strategies to diversify treatment for bacterial infections

Ninety-five years after Fleming's discovery of penicillin, a bounty of antibiotic compounds have been discovered, modified, or synthesised. Diversification of target sites, improved stability and altered activity spectra have enabled continued antibiotic efficacy, but overwhelming reliance and misuse has fuelled the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). An estimated 1.27 million deaths were attributable to antibiotic resistant bacteria in 2019, representing a major threat to modern medicine. Although antibiotics remain at the heart of strategies for treatment and control of bacterial diseases, the threat of AMR has reached catastrophic proportions urgently calling for fresh innovation. The last decade has been peppered with ground-breaking developments in genome sequencing, high throughput screening technologies and machine learning. These advances have opened new doors for bioprospecting for novel antimicrobials. They have also enabled more thorough exploration of complex and polymicrobial infections and interactions with the healthy microbiome. Using models of infection that more closely resemble the infection state in vivo, we are now beginning to measure the impacts of antimicrobial therapy on host/microbiota/pathogen interactions. However new approaches are needed for developing and standardising appropriate methods to measure efficacy of novel antimicrobial combinations in these contexts. A battery of promising new antimicrobials is now in various stages of development including co-administered inhibitors, phages, nanoparticles, immunotherapy, anti-biofilm and anti-virulence agents. These novel therapeutics need multidisciplinary collaboration and new ways of thinking to bring them into large scale clinical use.

Antimicrobial activity of phenyllactic acid against Klebsiella pneumoniae and its effect on cell wall membrane and genomic DNA

As Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) has acquired high levels of resistance to multiple antibiotics, it is considered a worldwide pathogen of concern, and substitutes for traditional antibiotics are urgently needed. 3-Phenyllactic acid (PLA) has been reported to have antimicrobial activity against food-borne bacteria. However, there was no experiment evidence for the exact antibacterial effect and mechanism of PLA kills pathogenic KP. In this study, the Oxford cup method indicated that PLA is effective to KP with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. Furthermore, PLA inhibited the growth and biofilm formation of in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. In vivo, PLA could significantly increase the survival rate of infected mice and reduce the pathological tissue damage. The antibacterial mode of PLA against KP was further explored. Firstly, scanning electron microscopy illustrated the disruption of cellular ultrastructure caused by PLA. Secondly, measurement of leaked alkaline phosphatase demonstrated that PLA disrupted the cell wall integrity of KP and flow cytometry analysis with propidium iodide staining suggested that PLA damaged the cell membrane integrity. Finally, the results of fluorescence spectroscopy and agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrated that PLA bound to genomic DNA and initiated its degradation. The anti-KP mode of action of PLA was attributed to the destruction of the cell wall, membrane, and genomic DNA binding. These findings suggest that PLA has great potential applications as antibiotic substitutes in feed additives against KP infection in animals.

Combination of AS101 and Mefloquine Inhibits Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in vivo

Background

In recent years, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has spread around the world, leading to a high mortality and close attention of medical community. In this study, we aim to find a new strategy of treatment for CRPA infections.

Methods

Eight strains of CRPA were collected, and PCR detected the multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). The antimicrobial susceptibility test was conducted using the VITEK@2 compact system. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for AS101 and mefloquine was determined using the broth dilution method. Antibacterial activity was tested in vitro and in vivo through the chessboard assay, time killing assay, and a mouse model. The mechanism of AS101 combined with mefloquine against CRPA was assessed through the biofilm formation inhibition assay, electron microscopy, and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Results

The results demonstrated that all tested CRPA strains exhibited multidrug resistance. Moreover, our investigation revealed a substantial synergistic antibacterial effect of AS101-mefloquine in vitro. The assay for inhibiting biofilm formation indicated that AS101-mefloquine effectively suppressed the biofilm formation of CRPA-5 and CRPA-6. Furthermore, AS101-mefloquine were observed to disrupt the bacterial cell wall and enhance the permeability of the cell membrane. This effect was achieved by stimulating the production of ROS, which in turn hindered the growth of CRPA-3. To evaluate the therapeutic potential, a murine model of CRPA-3 peritoneal infection was established. Notably, AS101-mefloquine administration resulted in a significant reduction in bacterial load within the liver, kidney, and spleen of mice after 72 hours of treatment.

Conclusion

The present study showed that the combination of AS101 and mefloquine yielded a notable synergistic bacteriostatic effect both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting a potential clinical application of this combination in the treatment of CRPA.

Emergence of KPC-134, a KPC-2 variant associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain

The emergence of various new Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants leading to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failure is a new challenge in current clinical anti-infection treatment. Here, we report a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae 1072-2 clinical strain carrying a novel KPC variant, KPC-134, which differs from KPC-2 by both single mutation (D178A) and 8-amino acid insertions (asp-asp-asn-arg-ala-pro-asn-lys). The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the isolate was resistant to meropenem (MIC = 4 mg/L), ceftazidime (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L), cefepime (MIC ≥128 mg/L), aztreonam (MIC ≥128 mg/L), and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC ≥128 mg/L) but sensitive to imipenem (MIC = 0.5 mg/L), imepenem-relebactam (MIC = 0.5 mg/L), meropenem-vaborbactam (MIC = 2 mg/L), and aztreonam-avibactam (MIC = 4 mg/L). The plasmid containing blaKPC-134 was isolated from K. pneumoniae, and the blaKPC-134 gene was cloned into plasmid pHSG398 and transformed into an Escherichia coli DH5α to observe changes in antimicrobial resistance. The results indicated that the transformant was positive for blaKPC-134 and increased MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam by 512-fold, 256-fold, 16-fold, and 4-fold, respectively, compared with the recipient. The results of third-generation sequencing showed that the blaKPC-134 gene was carried by a 133,789 bp IncFII-IncR plasmid, and many common resistance genes (including blaCTX-M-65, blaTEM-1B, blaSHV-12, rmtB, and catB4) along with the IS26, tnpR, ISkpn8, ISkpn6-like, and Tn1721 elements were identified. IMPORTANCE The emergence of various new KPC variants leading to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failure is a new challenge for clinical anti-infection treatment. Here, we describe the characterization of a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant blaKPC-134-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain for the first time. K. pneumoniae bearing with KPC variant often mislead clinical anti-infection treatment because of their unique antimicrobial susceptibility profile and the tendency of conventional carbapenemase assays to give false negative results. Therefore, timely identification of KPC variants and effective anti-infective therapy are key to saving infected patients.

In vitro Synergistic Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Aztreonam or Meropenem Against Clinical Enterobacterales Producing blaKPC or blaNDM

Background

It is often challenging to select appropriate combination therapies to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) with high-level resistance to carbapenem.

Methods

We investigated the in vitro synergistic activity of ceftazidime-avibactam-, polymyxin- or tigecycline-, and meropenem-based combinations using checkerboard assays against 16 CRE including Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying bla_KPC-2 (CR1-bla_KPC-2) and Enterobacter cloacae carrying bla_NDM-1 (CR2-bla_NDM-1) with meropenem MICs ≥128 mg/L. Time-kill assays were used to observe synergistic bactericidal activity.

Results

Meropenem in combination with ertapenem, amikacin, tigecycline or polymyxin B, and tigecycline plus ceftazidime-avibactam showed weak synergistic activities against CR1-bla_KPC-2 and CR2-bla_NDM-1. Polymyxin B combined with tigecycline or ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam plus amikacin showed synergistic effects against two tigecycline-non-susceptible KPC-producers or three ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant NDM-producer, and 50% (5/10) of strains with amikacin MICs ≥4096 mg/L, respectively. Synergistic interactions of ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam or meropenem in checkerboard assays were measured for 100% (16/16) and 93.8% (15/16) of strains, respectively. The time-kill assay further verified that the ceftazidime-avibactam combination had the potential to restore aztreonam susceptibility and reduced meropenem MICs to 8 mg/L.

Conclusion

Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam or meropenem could be an effective strategy for treating CRE infections, particularly those with high-level resistance to carbapenems and/or ceftazidime-avibactam.

Identification of KPC-112 from an ST15 Klebsiella pneumoniae Strain Conferring Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam

Ceftazidime-avibactam is an effective antibiotic combination of a β-lactam and a β-lactamase inhibitor against Klebsiella pneumoniae-carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales. Despite a relatively low resistance rate, reports of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam mainly caused by the mutations in KPC have increased in recent years. Here, we report a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae strain carrying a novel KPC variant, KPC-112, which differs from KPC-2 by 4-amino-acid deletions at Ambler positions 166L/167E and 242G/243T. The isolate was identified as K. pneumoniae by a Vitek mass spectrometer (bioMérieux, France). The MICs of antimicrobial agents were determined using broth microdilution susceptibility method. The result showed that the isolate was resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC = >128 mg/L) but susceptible to imipenem (MIC = 0.5 mg/L), meropenem (MIC = 1 mg/L), and tigecycline (MIC = 2 mg/L). The carbapenemase genes were confirmed by PCR-based sequencing. Plasmid transformation assay showed that the bla_KPC-112-positive transformant increased MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, and cefepime by at least 256-fold, 128-fold, and 128-fold, respectively, compared with the recipient Escherichia coli DH5α. According to the whole-genome sequencing analysis, many common resistance genes were identified, including bla_KPC-112, bla_OXA-1, bla_CTX-M-15, bla_TEM-1B, bla_SHV-28, aac(6')Ib-cr, aac(3)-IId, qnrS1, catA2, catB4, and fosA6, and mutations of GyrA (GyrA-83F and GyrA-87A) and ParC (ParC-80I) were also found. Overall, our study highlights the importance of monitoring susceptibility during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment and accurate detection of KPC variants. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are one of the most serious antimicrobial resistance problems in the world, listed as an "urgent" threat by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Among CRE, K. pneumoniae-carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP) has become a significant health threat due to its rapid transmissibility and high mortality. With the wider clinical use of ceftazidime-avibactam, reports of resistance have increased in recent years even though the overall resistance rate remains relatively low. Among the reported resistance mechanisms are mainly mutations derived from the bla_KPC-2 or bla_KPC-3 gene. Here, we describe the characterization of a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant bla_KPC-112-positive K. pneumoniae clinical isolate for the first time. A number of Enterobacteriaceae isolates producing these kinds of KPC variants might be missed by conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods and lead to irrational drug use. So, this study of KPC-112 will help to establish the diversity of KPCs and remind researchers of the challenge of drug resistance and detection brought by the KPC variants.

In vitro and in vivo Antimicrobial Activities of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Alone or in Combination with Aztreonam Against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Introduction

To examine the in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) alone or in combination with aztreonam (ATM) against KPC-, NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains.

Methods

A total of 67 clinical non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains were selected for the microdilution broth method that was performed to analyze the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the combination antimicrobial susceptibility test using checkerboard titration method. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) was calculated to determine the antimicrobial effect. The time-kill assays and the mouse infection model were used to study the bactericidal effect and therapeutic effect of CZA alone or in combination with ATM.

Results

The CZA minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of CZA revealed that 29 KPC-producing strains and 1 OXA-producing strain were ≤4µg/mL. The CZA MIC values of 37 metal-β-lactamase (MBLs)-producing strains such as NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains were ≥128µg/mL, after combining with ATM, the FIC values were all below 0.51. The time-kill assays revealed that CZA at various concentrations of 2, 4 and 8 MIC showed significant bactericidal efficiency to the KPC-producing strains. For NDM-, IMP-producing strains, no colony growth was detected after 8 hours of incubation with CZA in combination with ATM. Six percent of the mice in the treatment group and 58% of the mice in the infection group died within 3 days.

Conclusion

Our in vitro results showed that CZA had a good antimicrobial effect on the KPC-producing and OXA-producing strains. CZA combined with ATM showed synergistic bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity against NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains. The combination of CZA and ATM reduced mortality and prolonged lifespan of mice infected with NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, and KPC+NDM-producing strains, which provides fundamental knowledge for improving treatment strategies and initializing clinical trials.

A Selective Medium for Screening Ceftazidime/Avibactam Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is an alternative antibiotic used for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). However, the CZA-resistant CRE strains have been detected worldwide. Therefore, it is critical to screen CZA-resistant CRE strains in colonized patients or a specific population so as to rapidly implement infection control measures to limit their transmission. In this study, we developed a Salmonella-Shigella (SS) CZA-selective medium and assessed its performance to screen for clinical CZA-resistant CRE isolates in both pure-strain specimens and stool samples. A total of 150 non-duplicated isolates, including 75 CZA-susceptible and 75 CZA-resistant CRE pathogens, were tested by using the broth microdilution method and the SS CZA medium, respectively. The bacterial suspensions were serially diluted in the SS CZA medium, which showed excellent screening performance in both pure CZA-resistant CRE strain and the stool samples with the lowest detection limit of 10¹-10² and 10¹-10³ CFU/ml, respectively. Notably, none of the susceptible isolates showed growth even at the highest dilution concentration of 10⁸ CFU/ml. Most importantly, the SS CZA medium demonstrated excellent performance in screening simulated clinical polymicrobial specimens. Moreover, its screening performance was unaffected by the different resistance determinants for tested isolates. Cumulatively, our data suggest that the SS CZA medium can be used as a promising selective medium to screen CZA-resistant CRE, irrespective of their resistance mechanisms.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vivo translational biology and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

This review describes the translational in vivo and non-clinical pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) research that supported clinical trialling and subsequently licensing approval of ceftazidime/avibactam, a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination aimed at the treatment of infections by Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The review thematically follows on from the co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac171). Avibactam protected ceftazidime in animal models of infection with ceftazidime-resistant, β-lactamase-producing bacteria. For example, a single subcutaneous dose of ceftazidime at 1024 mg/kg yielded little effect on the growth of ceftazidime-resistant, blaKPC-2-carrying Klebsiella pneumoniae in the thighs of neutropenic mice (final counts of 4 × 108 to 8 × 108 cfu/thigh). In contrast, co-administration of avibactam in a 4:1 ratio (ceftazidime:avibactam) was bactericidal in the same model (final counts of 2 × 104 to 3 × 104 cfu/thigh). In a rat abdominal abscess model, therapy with ceftazidime or ceftazidime/avibactam (4:1 w/w) against blaKPC-2-positive K. pneumoniae resulted in 9.3 versus 3.3 log cfu/abscess, respectively, after 52 h. With respect to PK/PD, in Monte Carlo simulations, attainment of unbound drug exposure targets (ceftazidime fT>8 mg/L and avibactam fT>1 mg/L, each for 50% of the dosing interval) for the labelled dose of ceftazidime/avibactam (2 and 0.5 g, respectively, q8h by 2 h IV infusion), including dose adjustments for patients with impaired renal function, ranged between 94.8% and 99.6% of patients, depending on the infection modelled.

Synergistic Activity of Imipenem in Combination with Ceftazidime/Avibactam or Avibactam against Non-MBL-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDRPA) infection is a significant public health threat due to a lack of effective therapeutic options. New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, including ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), have shown a high resistance rate to XDRPA. This study was therefore conducted to describe the underlying genomic mechanism of resistance for CZA nonsusceptible XDRPA strains that are non-metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) producers as well as to examine synergism of CZA and other antipseudomonal agents. Furthermore, the synergistic antibacterial activity of the most effective antimicrobial combination against non-MBL-producing XDRPA was evaluated through in vitro experiments. The resistance profiles of 15 CZA-resistant XDRPA strains isolated from clinical specimens in China-Japan Friendship Hospital between January 2017 to December 2020 were obtained by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis. MBL genes bla_IMP-1 and bla_IMP-45 were found in 2 isolates (2/15, 13.3%); the other underlying CZA-resistance mechanisms involved the decreased OprD porin (13/13), bla_AmpC overexpression (8/13) or mutation (13/13), and upregulated efflux pumps (13/13). CZA-imipenem (CZA-IPM) combination was identified to be the most effective against non-MBL-producing XDRPA according to the results of WGS analysis and combined antimicrobial susceptibility tests, with an approximately 16.62-fold reduction in MICs compared to CZA alone. Furthermore, the results of checkerboard analysis and growth curve displayed the synergistic antimicrobial activity of CZA and IPM against non-MBL-producing XDRPA. Electron microscopy also revealed that CZA-IPM combination might lead to more cellular structural alterations than CZA or IPM alone. This study suggested that the CZA-IPM combination has potential for non-MBL-producing XDRPA with bla_AmpC overexpression or mutation, decreased OprD porin, and upregulated efflux pumps. IMPORTANCE Handling the infections by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDRPA) strains is challenging due to their complicated antibiotic resistance mechanisms in immunosuppressed patients with pulmonary diseases (e.g., cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung transplant), ventilator-associated pneumonia, and bloodstream infections. The current study suggested the potentiality of the ceftazidime-avibactam-imipenem combination against XDRPA with bla_AmpC overexpression or mutation, decreased OprD porin, and/or upregulated efflux pumps. Our findings indicate the necessity of combined drug sensitivity tests against XDRPA and also lay a foundation for the development of prevention, control, and treatment strategies in XDRPA infections.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Based Versus Tigecycline-Based Regimen for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae-Induced Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to assess the safety profile and outcomes of a ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based regimen and compare them with those of a tigecycline (TGC)-based regimen in intensive care unit (ICU) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), which is classified into hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

Clinical and microbiological cure rates, 28-day survival rates, and safety evaluation findings were compared between patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based regimen and those treated with TGC-based regimen in this retrospective study. Conventional multivariate logistic regression analysis and regression adjustment analysis with propensity score (PS) were performed to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 105 cases of critically ill ICU patients with CRKP-induced HAP or VAP were included in the present study from July 2019 to September 2020; 62 patients (59%) received TGC-based regimen and 43 patients (41%) received CAZ-AVI-based regimen. The most common concomitant agent in the CAZ-AVI group and TGC group was carbapenem (44.2% versus 62.9%, P = 0.058), while only a small proportion of the study population received CAZ-AVI and TGC monotherapy (20.9% versus 6.5%, P = 0.027). The clinical and microbiological cure rates of the CAZ-AVI group were superior to those of the TGC group [51.2% versus 29.0% (P = 0.022) and 74.4% versus 33.9% (P < 0.001), respectively]. No significant differences in the 28-day survival rates were identified between the two groups (69.8% versus 66.1%, P = 0.695). Conventional multivariate logistic regression and PS analyses showed that patients who had used CAZ-AVI were more likely to have achieved a clinical cure [4.767 (95%CI 1.694-13.414), P=0.003;3.405 (95%CI 1.304-8.889), P=0.012] and microbiological success [6.664 (95%CI 2.626-16.915), P<0.001;7.778 (95%CI 2.717-22.265), P<0.001] than patients who used TGC. However, the difference in the 28-day survival rates between the two groups was not significant. According to the safety evaluation findings, the CAZ-AVI group exhibited a generally lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with that in the TGC group.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI may be a suitable alternative for TGC in the treatment of critically ill patients with CRKP-induced HAP or VAP. These observations require further confirmation in larger randomized prospective clinical trials.

Drug Susceptibility and Molecular Epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection in ICU Patients in Shanghai, China

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are recognized as important nosocomial infections. Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the major causes of bacteremia. This retrospective study focused on drug susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of K. pneumoniae isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) patients with BSI in Shanghai, China.

Methods: Consecutive K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from ICU patients. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted by the broth microdilution method. PCR was performed to detect antimicrobial resistance genes. We also completed multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and GoeBURST was used to analyze the result of MLST.

Results: A total of 78 K. pneumoniae isolates were enrolled. K. pneumoniae from ICU-BSIs were highly resistant to almost all common antibiotics. The most frequent resistance determinants responsible for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers were bla_CTX−M−14, bla_CTX−M−15, and bla_CTX−M−55. KPC was the only enzyme, which was detected by the carbapenemase producers. The most principal sequence types (STs) were ST11, ST15, and ST23.

Conclusion: This study presents for the first time the antibiotic resistance phenotype and molecular epidemiology of K. pneumoniae isolated from ICU patients with BSIs in Shanghai. ICU-BSI K. pneumoniae is characteristic of a high resistance rate. The occurrence of the KPC-2 enzyme may result from nosocomial clonal dissemination of ST11 K. pneumoniae.

Performance Evaluation of the Gradient Diffusion Strip Method and Disk Diffusion Method for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Dual-Center Study

Objectives: Ceftazidime–avibactam is a novel synthetic beta-lactam + beta-lactamase inhibitor combination. We evaluated the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method and the disk diffusion method for the determination of ceftazidime–avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 302 clinical Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from two centers were conducted by broth microdilution (BMD), gradient diffusion strip method, and disk diffusion method for ceftazidime–avibactam. Using BMD as a gold standard, essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were determined according to CLSI guidelines. CA and EA rate > 90%, ME rate < 3%, and VME rate < 1.5% were considered as acceptable criteria. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing were performed to determine the carbapenem resistance genes of all 302 isolates.

Results: A total of 302 strains were enrolled, among which 182 strains were from center 1 and 120 strains were from center 2. A percentage of 18.21% (55/302) of the enrolled isolates were resistant to ceftazidime–avibactam. The CA rates of the gradient diffusion strip method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 98.65% (73/74), respectively, and the EA rates were 97.37% (222/228) and 98.65% (73/74), respectively. The CA rates of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 95.95% (71/74), respectively. No VMEs were found by using the gradient diffusion strip method, while the ME rate was 0.40% (1/247). No MEs were found by using the disk diffusion method, but the VME rate was 5.45% (3/55). Therefore, all the parameters of the gradient diffusion strip method were in line with acceptable criteria. For 31 bla_KPC, 33 bla_NDM, 7 bla_IMP, and 2 bla_VIM positive isolates, both CA and EA rates were 100%; no MEs or VMEs were detected by either method. For 15 carbapenemase-non-producing resistant isolates, the CA and EA rates of the gradient diffusion strips method were 100%. Whereas the CA rate of the disk diffusion method was 80.00% (12/15), the VME rate was 20.00% (3/15).

Conclusion: The gradient diffusion strip method can meet the needs of clinical microbiological laboratories for testing the susceptibility of ceftazidime–avibactam drugs. However, the VME rate > 1.5% (5.45%) by the disk diffusion method. By comparison, the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method was better than that of the disk diffusion method.

Resistance Phenotype and Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Shanghai

Background: The emergence and wide global spread of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates are of great concern, and the aim of this study was to investigate drug resistance, molecular epidemiology, and genetic relationship of CRKP isolates from patients in Shanghai, China. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from April 2018 to July 2019, and a total of 133 CRKP isolates were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by VITEK-2 automated microbiology analyzer platform (bioMérieux, France) and the broth microdilution method. Polymerase chain reaction assays were used to investigate the presence of drug resistance genes. A modified carbapenem inactivation method was performed to detect carbapenemases. Multilocus sequence typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were conducted for genetic relatedness of 50 CRKP isolates selected. Results: Among 670 isolates of K. pneumoniae, 133 (19.9%) strains were identified as CRKP, of which, 76.7% (102/133) strains were isolated from intensive care units (ICUs). All the 133 CRKP isolates were found to be carbapenemase-producers and harbor blaKPC-2 gene. No other carbapenemase genes of blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaVIM, and blaIMP were detected. Furthermore, β-lactamase genes of blaSHV, blaCTX, and blaTEM were the most common resistance-associated genes among these KPC-2 producing isolates. All the 133 CRKP strains displayed >95% of resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems, except for gentamicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, tigecycline and colistin, and ceftazidime-avibactam. The most common sequence type was ST11, accounting for 90.0% of the 50 CRKP selected, followed by ST15 (10.0%). PFGE analysis clustered the 50 KPC-2-producing isolates into seven (A-G) distinct clonal clusters at 85% cutoff. Of which, A and G were the two major clusters, accounting for the majority of the strains collected in emergency ICU and neurosurgical ICU. And all the strains of clusters D and E were collected in cardiothoracic surgery ICU, except for one strain collected in one outpatient. Conclusion: The KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae belonged to ST11 was widely disseminated in ICUs, and active and effective surveillance of infection control strategies was initiated to limit the spread of CRKP strains.

Aztreonam/avibactam activity against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales collected in Europe, Asia and Latin America in 2019

BACKGROUND

Aztreonam is a monobactam stable to hydrolysis by metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and avibactam is a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that effectively inhibits serine carbapenemases (CPs). Aztreonam/avibactam is under clinical development for treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, including MBL-producers.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of aztreonam/avibactam against clinical Enterobacterales isolates.

METHODS

8787 Enterobacterales were collected consecutively from 64 medical centres located in Western Europe (W-EU; n = 4616; 26 centres in 10 nations), Eastern Europe (E-EU; n = 1554; 11 centres in 9 nations), the Asia-Pacific region (APAC; n = 1456; 17 centres in 9 nations), and Latin America (LATAM; n = 1161; 10 centres in 6 nations). Susceptibility tests were performed by reference broth microdilution methods and interpreted according to EUCAST criteria.

RESULTS

99.9% of isolates were inhibited at aztreonam/avibactam MIC of ≤8 mg/L (MIC50/90, ≤0.03/0.12 mg/L), including 99.7% of carbapenem-resistant (CRE; n = 396; MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L) and 99.7% of multidrug-resistant isolates (n = 1706; MIC50/90, 0.06/0.5 mg/L). CRE rates were 1.2%, 12.9%, 5.2%, and 5.8% in W-EU, E-EU, APAC, and LATAM, respectively (4.5% overall). A CP was identified in 90.2% of CRE isolates. The most common CPs were variants of KPC (35.9% of CRE), NDM (29.0%), and OXA-48 (26.8%). The highest aztreonam/avibactam MIC value among MBL-producers (n = 110; MIC50/90, 0.12/0.5 mg/L) was 2 mg/L. Susceptibility rates for ceftriaxone, meropenem, levofloxacin, and amikacin were highest in W-EU (80.9%, 99.0%, 80.7% and 97.9%, respectively) and lowest in E-EU (52.0%, 88.9%, 54.1%, and 84.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support clinical development of aztreonam/avibactam to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales, including MBL-producers.

Ceftazidime/avibactam and eravacycline susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in two Greek tertiary teaching hospitals

The present study evaluated the carbapenem resistance mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated in two Greek tertiary teaching hospitals and their susceptibility to currently used and novel antimicrobial agents.Forty-seven carbapenem resistant K. pneumoniae strains were collected in G. Papanikolaou and Ippokrateio hospital of Thessaloniki between 2016 and 2018. Strain identification and antimicrobial susceptibility was conducted by Vitek 2 system (Biomérieux France). Susceptibility against new antimicrobial agents was examined by disk diffusion method. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect blaKPC, blaVIM, blaNDM and blaOXA-48 genes.The meropenem-EDTA and meropenem-boronic acid synergy test performed on the 24 K. pneumoniae strains demonstrated that 8 (33.3%) yielded positive for metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) and 16 (66.6%) for K. pneumonia carbapenemases (KPC) production. Colistin demonstrated the highest in vitro activity (87.7%) among the 47 K. pneumoniae strains followed by gentamicin (76.5%) and tigecycline (51%). Among new antibiotics ceftazidime/avibactam showed the highest sensitivity (76.6%) in all strains followed by eravacycline (66.6%). The blaKPC gene was present in 30 strains (63.8%), the blaNDM in 11 (23.4%) and the blaVIM in 6 (12.8%). The blaOXA-48 gene was not detected.Well established antimicrobial agents such as colistin, gentamicin and tigecycline and novel antibiotics like ceftazidime/avibactam and eravacycline can be reliable options for the treatment of invasive infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Native mitral valve endocarditis associated with KPC producing Serratia marcescens bacteremia successfully treated with mitral valve replacement and ceftazidime-avibactam

•

First case of native valve endocarditis due to Klebsiella Pneumomiae carbapenemase (KPC) producing Serratia marcescens.

•

Patient underwent mitral valve replacement and was treated with monotherapy ceftazidime-avibactam during 6 weeks.

•

Long term treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam appears to be efficacious and well tolerated.

Consistent with global trends of infections due to multiple-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria, we report the first official case of native mitral valve endocarditis due to multi-resistant Klebsiella Pneumonia Carbapenemase (KPC) producing Serratia marcescens. The patient underwent mitral valve replacement and was successfully treated with monotherapy ceftazidime-avibactam.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

The superiority of combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections remains controversial. In vitro models may predict the efficacy of antibiotic regimens against CR-GNB. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and time-kill (TK) studies examining the in vitro efficacy of antibiotic combinations against CR-GNB [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019128104]. The primary outcome was in vitro synergy based on the effect size (ES): high, ES ≥ 0.75, moderate, 0.35 < ES < 0.75; low, ES ≤ 0.35; and absent, ES = 0). A network meta-analysis assessed the bactericidal effect and re-growth rate (secondary outcomes). An adapted version of the ToxRTool was used for risk-of-bias assessment. Over 180 combination regimens from 136 studies were included. The most frequently analysed classes were polymyxins and carbapenems. Limited data were available for ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam. High or moderate synergism was shown for polymyxin/rifampicin against Acinetobacter baumannii [ES = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], polymyxin/fosfomycin against Klebsiella pneumoniae (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.66-1.00) and imipenem/amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ES = 1.00, 95% CI 0.21-1.00). Compared with monotherapy, increased bactericidal activity and lower re-growth rates were reported for colistin/fosfomycin and polymyxin/rifampicin in K. pneumoniae and for imipenem/amikacin or imipenem/tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. High quality was documented for 65% and 53% of PK/PD and TK studies, respectively. Well-designed in vitro studies should be encouraged to guide the selection of combination therapies in clinical trials and to improve the armamentarium against carbapenem-resistant bacteria.

Prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in patients from Zhejiang, China, 2008-2018

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is emerging as a worldwide public health concern; however, the long-term molecular epidemiological surveillance of clinical CRKP in China is limited. We conducted a retrospective observational study (2008-2018) to assess the prevalence, susceptibility, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of clinical CRKP isolates. We found the prevalence of CRKP increased from 2.5%, 2008 to 15.8%, 2018. CRKP were significantly more frequent among hospitalized patients from ICU, and it was significantly more likely to be isolated from the capital city (Hangzhou) and the patients aged ≥60 years. Additionally, seasons and specimen types were associated with CRKP infections. The main CRKP sequence type (ST) was ST11, and bla _KPC-2 was the most prevalent gene variant. Together these data reveal an increasing incidence and resistance trends among CRKP, especially the ST11-bla _KPC-2-CRKP, in Zhejiang, during 2008-2018. Our findings are important for hospitals to limit its dissemination and optimize antibiotic administration.

Identification of a Depolymerase Specific for K64-Serotype Klebsiella pneumoniae: Potential Applications in Capsular Typing and Treatment

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), one of the major nosocomial pathogens, is increasingly becoming a serious threat to global public health. There is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic and preventive approaches to combat the pathogen. Here, we identified and characterized a novel capsule depolymerase (K64-ORF41) derived from Klebsiella phage SH-KP152410, which showed specific activities for K. pneumoniae K64-serotype. We showed that this depolymerase could be used in the identification of K64 serotypes based on the capsular typing, and the results agreed well with those from the conventional serotyping method using antisera. From this study, we also identified K64 mutant strains, which showed typing discrepancy between wzi-sequencing based genotyping and depolymerase-based or antiserum-based typing methods. Further investigation indicated that the mutant strain has an insertion sequence (IS) in wcaJ, which led to the alteration of the capsular serotype structure. We further demonstrated that K64-ORF41 depolymerase could sensitize the bacteria to serum or neutrophil killing by degrading the capsular polysaccharide. In summary, the identified K64 depolymerase proves to be an accurate and reliable tool for capsular typing, which will facilitate the preventive intervention such as vaccine development. In addition, the polymerase may represent a potential and promising therapeutic biologics against CRKP-K64 infections.

In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Mono- and Combined Therapies against Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan

Increasing carbapenem resistance rates worldwide underscored the urgent need of novel antimicrobials. Ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam combinations are developed to combat carbapenem resistance, but biological and geographic variations must be considered for antibiotic susceptibility patterns varied. Thus, we sought to assess the susceptibilities of ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against 660 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates (472 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 188 Escherichia coli) collected during an earlier Taiwan surveillance study. Agar dilution method was used to determine ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam susceptibility. Metallo-carbapenemase’s contribution to resistance were investigated with EDTA addition. The in vivo efficacies were evaluated using a Caenorhabditis elegans model. High susceptibility rates were observed for ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against the 472 carbapenem-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae (CnsKP) (85.2% and 95.3%, respectively) and 188 carbapenem-nonsusceptible E. coli (CnsEC) isolates (91.5% and 94.1%, respectively). For non-metallo-carbapenemase producers, the susceptibility rates for ceftazidime–avibactam were 93.6% for CnsKP and 97.7% for CnsEC, whereas only 7.1% CnsKP and 11.1% CnsEC in metallo-carbapenemase producers were susceptible to ceftazidime–avibactam. Of all isolates, 95.3% CnsKP and 94.1% CnsEC were susceptible to aztreonam–avibactam. In C. elegans model, ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam revealed effective against a bla_KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolate in vivo. Our results propose a positive therapeutic approach for both combinations against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan.

Prolonged Versus Intermittent Infusion of β-Lactam Antibiotics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Bacterial Killing in Preclinical Infection Models

BACKGROUND

Administering β-lactam antibiotics via prolonged infusions for critically ill patients is mainly based on preclinical evidence. Preclinical data on this topic have not been systematically reviewed before.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and targets reported in preclinical models and to compare the bactericidal efficacy of intermittent and prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. To compare the bactericidal action of β-lactam antibiotics across different modes of infusion, the reported PK/PD outcomes, expressed as the percentage of time (T) that free (f) β-lactam antibiotic concentrations remain above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%fT_>MIC) or trough concentration (C_min)/MIC of individual studies, were recomputed relative to the area under the curve of free drug to MIC ratio (fAUC₂₄/MIC). A linear mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to evaluate the impact of the β-lactam class, initial inoculum, Gram stain, in vivo or in vitro experiment and mode of infusion on the reduction of bacterial cells (in colony-forming units/mL).

RESULTS

Overall, 33 articles were included for review, 11 of which were eligible for meta-regression. For maximal bactericidal activity, intermittent experiments reported a PK/PD target of 40-70% fT_>MIC, while continuous experiments reported a steady-state concentration to MIC ratio of 4-8. The adjusted effect of a prolonged as opposed to intermittent infusion on bacterial killing was small (coefficient 0.66, 95% confidence interval - 0.78 to 2.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent and prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics require different PK/PD targets to obtain the same level of bacterial cell kill. The additional effect of a prolonged infusion for enhancing bacterial killing could not be demonstrated.

Evaluation of the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with colistin, doripenem, levofloxacin, tigecycline, and tobramycin against OXA-48 producing Enterobacterales

This study aims to analyze the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus various antibiotics against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales isolated from Intensive Care Units. Seventy-four non-duplicate OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales isolates were screened for their MICs by the microbroth dilution method. The in-vitro bactericidal and synergistic activities of ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with other antibiotics were determined by time-kill curve assays. According to our results, colistin was the most active drug with higher susceptibility rates in the strains. Colistin, levofloxacin, tobramycin, and doripenem showed bactericidal effects against different isolates. The best synergistic interactions were achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam + colistin, ceftazidime/avibactam + tobramycin, and ceftazidime/avibactam + tigecycline against studied strains used at 1xMIC concentrations at 24 h. No antagonism was observed against studied OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales strains.The findings of this study suggest that ceftazidime/avibactam plus colistin, tobramycin, or tigecycline were more effective against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales strains. This combination therapy could be an alternative antibiotic therapy for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales strains.

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase inhibitor combinations vs alternative antibiotics in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/acute pyelonephritis (APN).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO (Elton B. Stephens Co.), Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase databases were accessed until November 21, 2019. In this meta-analysis, only randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment efficacy of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics for cUTI/APN in adult patients were included. The outcomes included the clinical and microbiological responses, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Overall, the experimental group treated with a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and the control group comprised 1346 and 1376 patients, respectively. No significant difference in the clinical response rate at test-of-cure was observed between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (89.1% vs 88.3%, OR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.42; I = 28%) and the microbiologically evaluable population (95.2% vs 94.7%, OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.68-1.84; I = 0%). Additionally, the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was associated with a better microbiological response at test-of-cure than the comparators among the microbiological modified intent-to-treat population (74.4% vs 68.5%, OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72; I = 45%) and microbiologically evaluable population (80.1% vs 72.5%, OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.06-2.10; I = 58%). Finally, the risk of AEs associated with the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was similar to that associated with the comparators (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE], OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23; I = 19%; serious AEs, OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.82-1.76; I = 0%; treatment discontinuation for drug-related TEAE, OR, 077; 95% CI, 0.38-1.56, I = 5%). The all-cause mortality did not differ between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.37-3.81; I = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and microbiological responses of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of cUTI/APN are similar to those of other available antibiotics. These combinations also share a safety profile similar to that of other antibiotics.

Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Experimental Pneumonia Caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. pneumoniae in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is an emerging global public health threat that causes life-threatening pneumonia and bacteremia. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) represents a promising advance for the treatment of serious infections caused by KPC-Kp We investigated the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of experimental KPC-Kp pneumonia in persistently neutropenic rabbits. For single-dose and multidose (administration every 8 h) pharmacokinetics, rabbits received ceftazidime-avibactam intravenous infusions at 60/15, 90/22.5, and 120/30 mg/kg of body weight. Ceftazidime mean area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) ranged from 287 to 608 μg·h/ml for a single dose and from 300 to 781 μg·h/ml for multiple doses. Avibactam AUCs ranged from 21 to 48 μg·h/ml for a single dose and from 26 to 48 μg·h/ml for multiple doses. KPC-Kp pneumonia was established by direct endotracheal inoculation. Treatments consisted of ceftazidime-avibactam at 120/30 mg/kg every 6 h, a polymyxin B (PMB) loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg followed by 1.5 mg/kg every 12 h q12h, or no treatment (untreated controls [UC]). There were significant reductions in the residual bacterial burden, lung weights, and pulmonary hemorrhage scores in CZA- and PMB-treated rabbits for a 7-day or a 14-day (P ≤ 0.01) course in comparison with those in the UC. These results corresponded to significant decreases in the bacterial burden in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after a 7-day or a 14-day treatment (P ≤ 0.01). The outcomes demonstrated an improved response at 14 days versus that at 7 days. There was significantly prolonged survival in rabbits treated with CZA for 14 days in comparison with that in the PMB-treated or UC rabbits (P ≤ 0.05). This study demonstrates that ceftazidime-avibactam displays linear dose-proportional exposures simulating those seen from human plasma pharmacokinetic profiles, is active for the treatment of experimental KPC-Kp pneumonia in persistently neutropenic rabbits, and provides an experimental foundation for the treatment of severely immunocompromised patients with this life-threatening infection.

Will ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam be effective for NDM and OXA-48-Like producing organisms: Lessons learnt from In vitro study

Introduction

Carbapenem resistance (CR) in Klebsiella pneumoniae is mainly mediated by bla NDM and bla OXA-48 carbapenemases. Newer Food and Drug Administration-approved antimicrobial ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A) has a potent activity against bla OXA-48-like producers. However, its activity is limited in organisms co-producing bla NDM and bla OXA-48-like. Addition of aztreonam (ATM) to C/A potentially expands the spectrum of coverage for carbapenemase co-producers. With this, we aimed to determine the synergistic activity of combination of C/A plus ATM against bla NDM, bla OXA-48-like and co-producers of bla NDM + bla OXA-48-like producing CR Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp).

Materials and Methods

A total of 12 isolates of CRKp-harbouring genes encoding bla NDM and bla OXA-48-like were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for several antimicrobial agents, including C/A (0.5-8 μg/ml) by broth microdilution method. Checkerboard assay was performed for the combination of C/A plus ATM at varying concentrations. Fold differences in the MIC of C/A with and without addition of ATM were determined to infer synergistic effects.

Results

MIC of C/A and ATM ranged from 0.5 to >8 μg/ml and 64 to 2048 μg/ml, respectively. Two isolates were susceptible to C/A with MIC of 0.5 and 1 μg/ml, while others were resistant with MIC of >8 μg/ml. Synergistic effects of >8-fold MIC difference in C/A MIC were noted with addition of ATM at 4 μg/ml. This was observed for all CRKp with profiles of bla NDM, bla OXA-48-like and co-producers of bla NDM + bla OXA-48-like genes, which was a promising effect. Notably, all five of the colistin-resistant CRKp were inhibited with >8-fold MIC difference in the combination of C/A plus ATM at 4 μg/ml.

Conclusion

With the increasing burden of CRKp, the use of C/A with ATM combination seems to be very promising, especially for bla NDM, bla OXA-48-like and co-producers of bla NDM + bla OXA-48like carbapenemases.

First Reported Nosocomial Outbreak Of NDM-5-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae In A Neonatal Unit In China

Purpose

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) have emerged worldwide and also being a major threat to children and neonate. In this study, we describe a nosocomial outbreak of NDM-5-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in neonatal unit of a teaching hospital in China from September 2015 to September 2016.

Patients and methods

We collected 12 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae outbreak strains from 12 newborns and characterized these isolates for their antimicrobial susceptibility, clone relationships, and multi-locus sequence types using vitek-2 compact system, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). Resistant genes were detected by using PCR and sequencing. Plasmid conjugation experiment was carried out to determine the transferability of carbapenem resistance. PCR-based replicon typing (PBRT), S1 nuclease-PFGE, and southern blotting were conducted for plasmid profiling.

Results

All 12 K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to carbapenems and carried bla_NDM-5, bla_TEM-1 and bla_SHV-11. Furthermore, PFGE analysis showed that NDM-5-producing K. pneumoniae were clonally related and MLST assigned them to sequence type 337. Conjugative assays showed that plasmids harboring bla_NDM-5 gene were self-transmissible. Plasmid analysis suggested that all bla_NDM-5 gene located on a ~45 kb IncX3 type plasmid.

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a clone outbreak of bla_NDM-5-carrying K. pneumoniae isolates from neonates. There is an urgent need for effective infection control measures to prevent bla_NDM-5 variants from becoming epidemic in the neonates in the future.

Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing concern due to limited treatment options. Knowledge of the common uropathogens in addition to local susceptibility patterns is essential in determining appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy of UTIs. The recommended first-line empiric antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 5-day course of nitrofurantoin, a 3-g single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine, or a 5-day course of pivmecillinam. High rates of resistance for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin preclude their use as empiric treatment of UTIs in several communities, particularly if patients who were recently exposed to them or in patients who are at risk of infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales. Second-line options include oral cephalosporins such as cephalexin or cefixime, fluoroquinolones and β-lactams, such as amoxicillin-clavulanate. Current treatment options for UTIs due to AmpC- β -lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. Treatment oral options for UTIs due to ESBLs-E coli include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin while pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin are treatment oral options for ESBLs- Klebsiella pneumoniae. Parenteral treatment options for UTIs due to ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriales include piperacillin-tazobactam (for ESBL-E coli only), carbapenems including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, and sulopenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, fosfomycin, sitafloxacin, and finafloxacin. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, colistin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam and amoxicillin-clavulanate, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, tigecycline are treatment options for UTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE). Treatment options for UTIs caused by multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas spp. include fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems including imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem, and fosfomycin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, cefiderocol, and colistin. It is important to use the new antimicrobials wisely for treatment of UTIs caused by MDR-organisms to avoid resistance development.