Effects of restrictive-prescribing stewardship on antibiotic consumption in primary care in China: an interrupted time series analysis, 2012-2017

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance during the COVID-19 Era among Hospitals in Saudi Arabia and the Implications

The inappropriate prescribing of antimicrobials increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which poses an appreciable threat to public health, increasing morbidity and mortality. Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing includes their prescribing in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, despite limited evidence of bacterial infections or coinfections. Knowledge of current antimicrobial utilization in Saudi Arabia is currently limited. Consequently, the objective of this study was to document current antimicrobial prescribing patterns among Saudi hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study included patients with or without COVID-19 who were admitted to five hospitals in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Data were gathered using the Global PPS methodology and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Out of 897 hospitalized patients, 518 were treated with antibiotics (57.7%), with an average of 1.9 antibiotics per patient. There were 174 culture reports collected, representing 36.5% of all cases. The most common indication for antibiotics use was community-acquired infections, accounting for 61.4% of all cases. 'Watch' antibiotics were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, with the cephalosporins and carbapenems representing 38.7% of all antibiotics prescribed, followed by the penicillins (23.2%). Notably, Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Azithromycin were prescribed at relatively higher rates for COVID-19 patients. These findings highlight the need for continuous efforts to optimize the rational use of antibiotics through instigating appropriate antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals and, as a result, reduce AMR in the country.

Effect of a national antibiotic stewardship intervention in China targeting carbapenem overuse: An interrupted time-series analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess trends and patterns of carbapenem use and to evaluate the effects of a nationwide antibiotic stewardship policy to reduce carbapenem overuse.

METHODS

In this quasi-experimental study, using longitudinal data from the national drug procurement database and interrupted time-series analyses with carbapenems as the intervention group and possible carbapenem substitutes as the comparison group, we evaluated the effects of a national stewardship policy on carbapenem consumption and expenditures, by region and types of healthcare institutions.

RESULTS

The carbapenem procurement volume declined by -28.8% (95% CI -35.0 to -22.6) (-334.4 thousand defined daily doses [DDDs] per month), and carbapenem expenditures showed a relative reduction of -38.1% (-43.9 to -32.2). The gap between the use of carbapenems and each drug in the comparison group narrowed after the policy intervention, with an increase in tigecycline use (14.9 thousand DDDs [10.8-18.9]) and a slower decrease in use of certain third-generation cephalosporin combinations (-85.7 [-143.0 to -28.4]), penicillin combinations (-200.9 [-421.4-19.6]), and fourth-generation cephalosporins (-116.9 [-219.8 to -14.0]). Consumption was highest during the pre-policy period, and declines were largest following the intervention in the eastern region (-32.1%, -39.8 to -24.4) and among tertiary hospitals (-266.2 [-339.5 to -192.9] thousand DDDs per month).

CONCLUSION

This population-level drug utilization research represents the first comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of China's nationwide carbapenem stewardship. The national policy targeting carbapenem prescribing has led to a sustained reduction in carbapenem use with limited substitution. Effects varied geographically and were concentrated in tertiary and secondary hospitals.

Antibiotic use in township hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shandong, China

BACKGROUND

The overuse of antibiotics in primary healthcare settings (PHSs) has caused a serious public health problem in China. The outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about dramatic changes in the supply of and demand for medical services in PHSs, possibly resulting in unprecedented changes in antibiotic use.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the immediate and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the changes in antibiotic consumption in PHSs.

METHOD

The data on antibiotic consumption were collected from selected township hospitals in Shandong, China from January 2019 to December 2021. Antibiotic consumption was quantified by using the defined daily doses (DDDs) and the WHO Access, Watch, Reserve category. A segmented regression model was established to analyze the immediate and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic use by using the interrupted time series analysis.

RESULTS

The overall antibiotic consumption in all PHSs decreased by 32.04% and 16.69% in 2020 and 2021 respectively compared to the corresponding period in 2019. Over the entire study period, the use of penicillins (J01C) and cephalosporins (J01D) accounted for more than 50% of the total antibiotic consumption. The average annual consumption of Watch category antibiotics decreased by 42.02% and 33.47% in 2020 and 2021 respectively compared to that in 2019. According to the interrupted time series analysis, the total antibiotic consumption decreased significantly immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak (coef. = - 2.712, p = 0.045), but it then increased significantly over a long-term (coef. = 0.205, p = 0.005). Additionally, the consumption of Access category antibiotics increased significantly in PHSs in the long-term (coef. = 0.136, p = 0.018). However, the consumption of Watch category antibiotics declined sharply immediately after the pandemic (coef. = - 1.222, p < 0.001), but then it increased slightly over a long-term (coef. = 0.073, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The extensive use of penicillin and cephalosporins should be of great concern. After the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, the total antibiotic consumption decreased generally and the use pattern was improved to some extent in the PHSs in Shandong, China. This provides an opportunity for improving the misuse of antibiotics in PHSs in China.

Global prevalence of resistance to macrolides in Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of resistance to macrolides in Mycoplasma pneumoniae worldwide.

METHODS

Prior to 12 December 2020, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase databases were searched for epidemiological studies of M. pneumoniae resistance. Two reviewers independently extracted data from included studies. The extracted data include sampling population, total sampling number, the number of resistant strains and the molecular subtype of resistant strains. The estimate of resistance prevalence was calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 17 873 strains were obtained from five continents and reported in 98 investigations between 2000 and 2020, with 8836 strains characterized as macrolide resistant. In summary, macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae was most common in Asia (63% [95% CI 56, 69]). In Europe, North America, South America and Oceania, the prevalence was 3% [2, 7], 8.6% [6, 11], 0% and 3.3%, respectively. Over the last 20 years, the prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae has remained high in China (81% [73, 87]), with a significant increasing trend in South Korea (4% [1, 9] to 78% [49, 93], P < 0.0001). Furthermore, a point mutation at 2063 from A to G was mostly related to M. pneumoniae macrolide resistance. In terms of clinical outcomes, longer cough (mean difference [MD]: 2.93 [0.26, 5.60]) and febrile days (MD: 1.52 [1.12, 1.92]), and prolonged hospital stays (MD: 0.76 [0.05, 1.46]) might be induced by macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae varies globally, with eastern Asia having a greater degree of resistance. However, attention is also required in other areas, and antibiotic alternatives should be considered for treatment in high-prevalence countries.

Urinary antibiotic level of school children in Shanghai, East China, 2017-2020

In recent years, an extensive exposure to antibiotics from various sources has been demonstrated in China by the biomonitoring method, but the temporal trend remains little known. The study aim was to explore the temporal trend of exposure to antibiotics and associated health risk in children. A dynamic child cohort was established in Shanghai, East China between 2017 and 2020. A total of 684 school children aged 7-11 years were included, and 280 in 2017, 279 in 2018, 288 in 2019, and 287 in 2020 participated in annual surveys. Twenty-three typical antibiotics and three metabolites from five categories (four tetracyclines, five qinolones, six macrolides, eight sulfonamides, and three phenicols), bisphenol A (BPA), and monobutyl phthalate (MBP) were determined in urine. Logistic regression analysis with generalized estimating equations was conducted to investigate the associations between various variables and the detection frequency of antibiotics in urine. Seventeen antibiotics and three metabolites were found in 51.9% of all urine samples. Compared to 2017, the detection frequency in urine reduced 31.8% in 2020 for all antibiotics (58.2% vs 39.7%) and reduced 36.8%-55.8% for tetracyclines (11.4% vs 7.0%), qinolones (34.3% vs 21.3%), macrolides (8.6% vs 3.8%), sulfonamides (16.4% vs 8.7%), and phenicols (19.3% vs 12.2%). After accounting for personal characteristics, food consumption, and urinary BPA and MBP, a decreasing temporal trend of detection frequencies was observed from 2017 to 2020 for most antibiotics. Urinary concentration, estimated daily intake, and acceptable daily intake-based health risk of antibiotics showed a temporal trend similar to detection frequency. There was an extensive exposure to antibiotics in children. However, a decreasing temporal trend occurred for the exposure during the period from 2017 to 2020. The trend was likely to be caused by decreased antibiotic use and/or decreased residues in food and/or drinking water.

Effects of Regulation on Carbapenem Prescription in a Large Teaching Hospital in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis, 2016-2018

Purpose

Carbapenem resistance due to the overuse of carbapenems has become a public health problem worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there are few policies guiding carbapenem prescription, and their effectiveness is still unclear. A regulation targeting carbapenem prescription was implemented in March 2017 in China. This study aimed to assess the effects of the regulation for providing evidence on the prudent use of carbapenems.

Patients and Methods

This was an interventional, retrospective study started in January 2017. The intervention covered establishing performance appraisal indicators, special authorisation, strict prescribing restrictions, and dedicated supervision, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data on adult inpatients who received at least one carbapenems were extracted from January 2016 to December 2018. Segmented regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of the regulation.

Results

A total of 2005 inpatients received carbapenems. Segmented regression models showed an immediate decline in the intensity of antibiotic consumption (IAC) of carbapenems (coefficient = −9.65, p < 0.001), particularly imipenem (coefficient = −6.82, p = 0.002), and the antibiotic consumption of carbapenems (coefficient = −133.60, p = 0.003) in the ICU. And there is a decreasing trend in the IAC of meropenem (coefficient = −0.03, p = 0.008) in all departments. Furthermore, the IAC of carbapenems and imipenem (coefficient = −0.36, p = 0.035; coefficient = −0.49, p = 0.025, respectively), and the average length of stay (ALoS) (coefficient = −0.73, p < 0.001) showed downward trends in the ICU.

Conclusion

The intervention effectively reduced the IAC of carbapenems and imipenem, carbapenem consumption and the ALoS in the ICU, and the IAC of meropenem in all departments. The effects of the intervention were significant in the ICU, which indicated an urgent need for stronger regulations focusing on critical departments in the future.