Heart rate at discharge in patients with acute decompensated heart failure is a predictor of mortality

Change in Systemic Arterial Pulsatility Index (SAPi) during Heart Failure Hospitalization is Associated with Improved Outcomes

Study Objective

To identify Change in Systemic Arterial Pulsatitlity index (ΔSAPi) as a novel hemodynamic marker associated with outcomes in heart failure (HF).

Design

The ESCAPE trial was a randomized controlled trial.

Setting

The ESCAPE trial was conducted at 26 sites.

Participants

134 patients were analyzed (mean age 56.8 ± 13.4 years, 29% female).

Interventions

We evaluated the change in SAPi, ([systemic pulse pressure/pulmonary artery wedge pressure) obtained at baseline and at the final hemodynamic measurement in the ESCAPE trial.

Main Outcome Measures

Change in SAPi, (ΔSAPi), was analyzed for the primary outcomes of death, heart transplant, left ventricular assist device (DTxLVAD) or hospitalization, (DTxLVADHF) and secondary outcome of DTxLVAD using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Median change in SAPi was 0.81 (IQR 0.20-1.68). ΔSAPi in uppermost quartile was associated with reductions in DTxLVADHF (HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.32, 0.93]). ΔSAPi in the uppermost and lowermost quartiles combined was similarly associated with significant reductions in DTxLVADHF (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.41, 0.94]). ΔSAPi higher than 1.17 was associated with improved DTxLVADHF. ΔSAPi was also associated with troponin levels at discharge (regression coefficient p = 0.001) and trended with 6-minute walk at discharge (Spearman correlation r = 0.179, p = 0.058).

Conclusion

ΔSAPi was strongly associated with improved HF clinical profile and adverse outcomes. These findings support further exploration of Δ SAPi in the risk stratification of HF.

Heart rate control and its predictors in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Data from the European Society of Cardiology Long-Term Registry

BACKGROUND

Higher resting heart rate (HR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and sinus rhythm (SR) is associated with increased mortality. In patients hospitalized for HF, the aim herein, was to assess the use and dosage of guideline-recommended HR lowering medications, HR control at discharge and predictors of HR control.

METHODS

In the present study, were Polish participants of the European Society of Cardiology HF Long-Term (ESC-HF-LT) Registry. Those selected were hospitalized for HF, with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR at discharge (n = 236). The patients were divided in two groups ( < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm). Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of HR ≥ 70 bpm.

RESULTS

Of patients with HFrEF and SR, 59% had HR ≥ 70 bpm at hospital discharge. At discharge, 96% and only 0.5% of the patients with HFrEF and SR received beta-blocker and ivabradine, respectively. In the HF groups < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm, only 11% and 4% of patients received beta-blocker target doses, respectively. There was no difference in the use of other guideline-recommended medications. Age, New York Heart Association class, HR on admission and lack of HR lowering medications were predictors of discharge HR ≥ 70 bpm.

CONCLUSIONS

Heart rate control after hospitalization for HFrEF is unsatisfactory, which may be attributed to suboptimal doses of beta-blockers, and negligence in use other HR lowering drugs (including ivabradine).

The prognostic value of heart rate at discharge in acute decompensation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

The effect of elevated heart rate (HR) on morbidity and mortality is evident in chronic stable heart failure; data in this regard in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) setting are scarce. In this single-centre study, we sought to address the prognostic value of HR and beta-blocker dosage at discharge on all-cause mortality among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and ADHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective observational study, 2945 patients were admitted for the first time with the primary diagnosis of ADHF between January 2008 and February 2018. Patients were divided by resting HR at discharge into three groups (HR < 70 b.p.m., HR 70-90 b.p.m., and HR > 90 b.p.m.). Evidence-based beta-blockers were defined as metoprolol, bisoprolol, and carvedilol. The doses of prescribed beta-blockers were calculated into a percentage target dose of each beta-blocker and divided to four quartiles: 0 < Dose ≤ 25%, 25% < Dose ≤ 50%, 50% < Dose ≤ 75%, and >75% of the target dose. Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratio for various HR categories and adjusting for clinical and laboratory variables. At discharge, 1226 patients had an HR < 70 b.p.m., 1347 patients had an HR at range 70-90 b.p.m., and 372 patients with an HR > 90 b.p.m. The 30 day mortality rate was 2.2%, 3.7%, and 12.1% (P < 0.001), respectively. Concordantly, 1 year mortality rate was 14.6%, 16.7%, and 30.4% (P < 0.001) among patients with HR < 70 b.p.m., HR 70-90 b.p.m., and HR > 90 b.p.m., respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was significantly increased only in HR above 90 b.p.m. category (hazard ratio, 2.318; 95% confidence interval, 1.794-2.996).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ADHF and an HR of <90 b.p.m. at discharge had significantly a lower 1 year mortality independent of the dosage of beta-blocker at discharge. It is conceivable to discharge these patients with lower HR.