Dabrafenib and trametinib activity in a patient with BRAF V600E mutated and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic endometrial cancer

Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors: an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase I study

BACKGROUND

Tunlametinib (HL-085) is a novel, highly selective MEK inhibitor with substantial clinical activities in patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma. This phase I study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of tunlametinib plus vemurafenib in patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed advanced BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors who had progressed on or shown intolerance or no available standard therapies were enrolled and received tunlametinib plus vemurafenib. This study consisted of a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Primary end points of this study were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy.

RESULTS

From August 17, 2018 to April 19, 2022, 72 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The RP2D for BRAF V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was tunlametinib 9 mg plus vemurafenib 720 mg, twice daily (BID, bis in die). Until the data cut-off date of December 15, 2023, of 33 NSCLC patients with evaluable disease, the objective response rate (ORR) was 60.6% (20/33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.1-77.1), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6-14.5) and median duration of response (DoR) was 11.3 months (95%CI, 6.8-NE). At the RP2D, ORR was 60.0% (9/15; 95% CI, 32.3-83.7), the median PFS was 10.5 months (95%CI, 5.6 -NE) and median DoR was 11.3 months (95%CI, 3.9-NE). Of 24 colorectal cancer patients with evaluable disease, the ORR was 25.0% (6/24; 95% CI, 5.6-NE). All 72 patients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and the most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were anemia (n = 13, 18.1%) and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (n = 10, 13.9%). Tunlametinib was absorbed rapidly with Tmax of 0.5-1 h. Vemurafeinib did not influence the system exposure of tunlametinib and vice versa, indicating no drug-drug interaction for this combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Tunlametinib (HL-085) plus vemurafenib had a favorable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600-mutant solid tumors. The RP2D for NSCLC was tunlametinib 9 mg BID plus vemurafeinib 720 mg BID.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03781219.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial

BRAFV600E alterations are prevalent across multiple tumors. Here we present final efficacy and safety results of a phase 2 basket trial of dabrafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in eight cohorts of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 36), biliary tract cancer (n = 43), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (n = 3), low-grade glioma (n = 13), high-grade glioma (n = 45), hairy cell leukemia (n = 55) and multiple myeloma (n = 19). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate in these cohorts was 56%, 53%, 0%, 67%, 54%, 33%, 89% and 50%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were median duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median DoR was 14.4 months, 8.9 months, not reached, 7.7 months, not reached, 31.2 months, not reached and 11.1 months, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months, 9.0 months, not reached, not evaluable, 9.5 months, 5.5 months, not evaluable and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months, 13.5 months, not reached, 21.8 months, not evaluable, 17.6 months, not evaluable and 33.9 months, respectively. The most frequent (≥20% of patients) treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (40.8%), fatigue (25.7%), chills (25.7%), nausea (23.8%) and rash (20.4%). The encouraging tumor-agnostic activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib suggests that this could be a promising treatment approach for some patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02034110 .

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) in the US Population: Demographics, Treatment Characteristics, and Survival Analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a lymphoplasmacytic proliferative disorder in the setting of hematopoietic stem cells and solid organ transplants. PTLD is divided into nondestructive, polymorphic, monomorphic, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Most cases of PTLDs are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) related (two third of the cases), and most are of B cell (80-85%) origin. The polymorphic PTLD subtype can be locally destructive and show malignant features. Treatment for PTLD includes a reduction in immunosuppression, surgery, cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, anti-viral agents, and/or radiation. The aim of this study was to examine the demographic factors and treatment modalities that influence survival in patients with polymorphic PTLD.

METHODS

About 332 cases of polymorphic PTLD were identified from 2000 to 2018 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was found to be 44 years. The most common age groups were between the ages of 1-19 years (n=100. 30.1%) and 60-69 years (n=70. 21.1%). The majority of cases in this cohort underwent systemic (cytotoxic chemo and/or immuno) therapy only (n=137, 41.3%), while 129 (38.9%) cases did not undergo any treatment. The overall five-year observed survival was 54.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 51.1 - 58.1). One-year and five-year survival with systemic therapy was 63.8% (95% CI, 59.6 - 68.0) and 52.5% (95% CI, 47.7 - 57.3), respectively. The one-year and five-year survival with surgery was 87.3% (95% CI, 81.2-93.4) and 60.8% (95% CI., 42.2 - 79.4), respectively. The one-year and five-year without therapy were 67.6% (95% CI, 63.2-72.0) and 49.6% (95% CI, 43.5-55.7), respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that surgery alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.386 (0.170-0.879), p = 0.023) was a positive predictor of survival. Race and sex were not predictors of survival, although age >55 years was a negative predictor for survival (HR 1.128 (1.139-1.346), p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Polymorphic PTLD is a destructive complication of organ transplantation that is usually associated with EBV positivity. We found that it most often presents in the pediatric age group, and its occurrence in those older than 55 years was associated with a worse prognosis. Treatment with surgery alone is associated with improved outcomes and should be considered in addition to a reduction in immunosuppression in cases of polymorphic PTLD.

Cytokine Based Immunotherapy for Cancer and Lymphoma: Biology, Challenges and Future Perspectives

Cytokines regulate both the innate and adaptive immune responses to cancer. Although antitumor activity has been seen for several cytokines in preclinical models, they have had limited success as single therapeutic agents in clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy. However, the possible combinations of cytokines with other immune therapeutics and the advancement in genetic engineering, synthetic biology and cellular and immune therapy has led to the revival of interest in cytokines as anticancer agents. This article will review several immunostimulatory cytokines with anticancer activity, focusing on the those that have been studied in treatment of lymphoma and highlighting recent advances of potential clinical relevance.

Recent advances in Lynch syndrome

Lynch syndrome is one of the most common hereditary cancer syndromes and is characterized by the development of many cancers, such as colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer and many other cancers. Lynch syndrome is caused by pathogenic germline variants in one of four DNA mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2) or by an EPCAM deletion. The MLH1 variant is correlated with the highest risk of CRC, while the MSH2 variant is correlated with the highest risk of other cancers. CRC is the most common cancer type that develops in individuals with Lynch syndrome, followed by endometrial cancer. Recent advances have been made to help us further understand the molecular pathogenesis of this disease and help improve diagnostic testing efficiency and surveillance strategies. Moreover, recent advances in immunotherapy provided by clinical trials also provide clinicians with more chances to better treat Lynch syndrome. This study aims to review many advances in the molecular genetics, clinical features, diagnosis, surveillance and treatment of Lynch syndrome.

BRAF/MEK inhibitors for BRAF V600E-mutant cancers in non-approved setting: a case series

The management of cancer has been traditionally dependent on the primary tumour type and specific histologic subtypes. Recently, the introduction of molecular profiling tools and its increasing use in clinical practice has facilitated the emergence of novel genomically driven treatment options within the standard of care landscape as well as in the clinical trial setting. One such aberration is mutation in v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), which results in hyperactivation of RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK signaling in the Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway. BRAF and Mitogen-activated protein kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors, although being currently approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer, have reported activity across other various cancers harbouring BRAF aberrations. It has been proposed that combined MEK and BRAF inhibition could overcome the acquired resistance commonly developed among patients receiving BRAF or MEK inhibitors as monotherapy. We report five cases of BRAF V600E (substitution of glutamic acid for valine in codon 600) aberrant refractory metastatic cancers treated with dual BRAF/MEK combination inhibitor therapy leading to an excellent clinical and radiological response and protracted duration of disease control.

First-Line Treatment of Widely Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Salivary Duct Carcinoma With Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which limited data exist to guide treatment decisions. With the advent of advanced molecular testing and tumor genomic profiling, clinicians now have the ability to identify potential therapeutic targets in difficult-to-treat cancers such as SDC. This report presents a male patient with widely metastatic SDC found on targeted next-generation sequencing to have a BRAF p.V600E mutation. He experienced a prolonged and robust response to first-line systemic chemotherapy with dabrafenib and trametinib. During his response interval, new data emerged to justify subsequent treatment with both an immune checkpoint inhibitor and androgen blockade after his disease progressed. To our knowledge, this is the first report of frontline BRAF-directed therapy eliciting a response in metastatic SDC.

A phase I clinical trial of binimetinib in combination with FOLFOX in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer who failed prior standard therapy

Background

This was a first in-human, open-label, dose-escalation phase I study conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of the combination of oral binimetinib and FOLFOX.

Materials and Methods

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who progressed on prior standard therapies received twice daily binimetinib continuously or intermittently with FOLFOX. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed in the first 2 cycles of study treatment. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of 5-FU and oxaliplatin was performed at the MTD in an expanded 6 patient cohort.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled and assessed for safety. In the dose-escalation phase, no DLTs were noted in all binimetinib dosing schedules and the MTD of binimetinib in with FOLFOX was 45 mg orally twice daily. There were no significant differences in the PKs of 5-FU or oxaliplatin with or without binimetinib. Continuous dosing of binimetinib produced SD at 2 months in 9 of 13 evaluable patients and a median PFS of 3.5 months. Nine of 10 patients had PD at 2 months on the intermittent arm.

Conclusions

Oral binimetinib and FOLFOX has a manageable toxicity profile and showed some evidence of antitumor activity in heavily pretreated mCRC patients.