Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice

[Effect of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies on Live Birth Outcomes and the Influencing Factors in Women of Advanced Maternal Age]

Objective

To investigate effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) on the reproductive outcomes of women of advanced maternal age (AMA) (≥38 years), and to analyze factors influencing the live birth rate in AMA women who have received PGT-A.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. AMA women undergoing PGT-A were enrolled in the PGT-A group. All of them underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycle between January 2019 and June 2023. AMA women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and their first oocyte retrieval cycle over the same period of time were enrolled in the control group (the non-PGT-A group) via propensity score matching. The PGT-A group and the non-PGT-A group each included 193 cycles, which were followed up until January 2024. Follow-up concerning live births was completed for all oocyte retrieval cycles conducted between January 2019 and October 2022. The reproductive outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte retrieval, while the secondary outcome indicators were cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CCPR) per oocyte retrieval and spontaneous abortion rate. For the 145 cycles in the PGT-A group with completed live birth follow-up, binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the influencing factors of live birth rates.

Results

A total of 145 cycles in the PGT-A group and 161 cycles in the non-PGT-A group completed follow-up for live births. The CLBR per oocyte retrieval of the PGT-A group was 25.52% (37/145), while that of the non-PGT-A group was 28.50% (46/161), with no significant difference being observed between the two groups (P<0.05). Of the 193 oocyte retrieval cycles in each group, 53 cycles in the PGT-A group and 72 cycles in the non-PGT-A group resulted in clinical pregnancies, with the difference in the CCPR per oocyte retrieval being statistically significant (27.46% vs. 37.31%, P<0.05). Concerning clinical pregnancies, the spontaneous abortion rate of the PGT-A group was lower than that of the non-PGT-A group, with the difference being statistically significant (7.55% vs. 25.00%, P<0.05). In AMA women who had undergone PGT-A for reproductive assistance, maternal age (odds ratio [OR]=0.786, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.635-0.973) and the antral follicle count (AFC) (OR=1.110, 95% CI: 1.013-1.216) were correlated with the outcome of live births outcome. The probability of live births decreased with increasing maternal age and decreasing AFC. When the female age was ≥42 years or when AFC≤8, the expected live birth outcome of PGT-A assisted pregnancy was poor.

Conclusion

PGT-A does not affect the CLBR per oocyte retrieval in AMA women, but it can effectively reduce the risks of implantation failure and spontaneous abortion due to fetal aneuploidies. For PGT-A-assisted pregnancy in AMA women, maternal age and AFC are important factors affecting the live birth outcomes.

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Unveiling the Chances of Success and Possible Consequences for Offspring

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is found in up to 15% of infertile men. While several causes for NOA have been identified, the exact etiology remains unknown in many patients. Advances in assisted reproductive technology, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and testicular sperm retrieval, have provided hope for these patients. This review summarizes the chances of success with ICSI for NOA patients and examines preoperative factors and laboratory techniques associated with positive outcomes. Furthermore, we reviewed possible consequences for offspring by the use of ICSI with testicular sperm retrieved from NOA patients and the interventions that could potentially mitigate risks. Testicular sperm retrieved from NOA patients may exhibit increased chromosomal abnormalities, and although lower fertilization and pregnancy rates are reported in NOA patients compared to other forms of infertility, the available evidence does not suggest a significant increase in miscarriage rate, congenital malformation, or developmental delay in their offspring compared to the offspring of patients with less severe forms of infertility or the offspring of fertile men. However, due to limited data, NOA patients should receive specialized reproductive care and personalized management. Counseling of NOA patients is essential before initiating any fertility enhancement treatment not only to mitigate health risks associated with NOA but also to enhance the chances of successful outcomes and minimize possible risks to the offspring.

Using preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease for preventing citrullinemia type 1 transmission

Aim

The aim of this study is to investigate if Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) can effectively identify unreported variants according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)to prevent citrullinemia type 1 affection.

Design

This study involves a detailed case analysis of a family with history of citrullinemia type 1, focusing on the use of PGT for monogenic diseases (PGT-M). The genetic variants were identified using ACMG guidelines, and PGT was employed to prevent the inheritance of these variants. The study included haplotype analysis and Sanger sequencing to confirm the results.

Results

The study identified previously unreported variations in the ASS1 gene causing citrullinemia type 1. PGT successfully prevented the transmission of these variants, resulting in the birth of a healthy fetus. However, challenges such as allele dropout (ADO) and gene recombination were encountered during haplotype analysis, which could potentially defeat the diagnosis. The study demonstrated that combining haplotype analysis with Sanger sequencing can enhance the accuracy of PGT.

Conclusion

Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) targeting likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants in the ASS1 gene, as rated by ACMG, allows the birth of healthy infants free from citrullinemia type 1. Additionally, the establishment of single haplotypes and Sanger sequencing can reduce the misdiagnosis rate caused by allele dropout (ADO) and genetic recombination.

Advancements and Applications of Preimplantation Genetic Testing in In Vitro Fertilization: A Comprehensive Review

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become an integral component of assisted reproductive technology (ART), offering couples the opportunity to screen embryos for genetic abnormalities before implantation during in vitro fertilization (IVF). This comprehensive review explores the advancements and applications of PGT in IVF, covering its various types, technological developments, clinical applications, efficacy, challenges, regulatory aspects, and future directions. The evolution of PGT techniques, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), has significantly enhanced the accuracy and reliability of genetic testing in embryos. PGT holds profound implications for the future of ART by improving IVF success rates, reducing the incidence of genetic disorders, and mitigating the emotional and financial burdens associated with failed pregnancies and genetic diseases. Recommendations for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers include staying updated on the latest PGT techniques and guidelines, exploring innovative technologies, establishing clear regulatory frameworks, and fostering collaboration to maximize the potential benefits of PGT in assisted reproduction. Overall, this review provides valuable insights into the current state of PGT and its implications for the field of reproductive medicine.

Should non-invasive prenatal testing be recommended for patients who achieve pregnancy with PGT?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether non-invasive prenatal testing is an alternative testing option to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in pregnant patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PGT and invasive or non-invasive pregnancy testing after euploid blastocyst transfer at our IVF centre between January 2017 and December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 321 patients were enrolled in this study, 138 (43.0%) received invasive pregnancy testing, and 183 (57.0%) patients underwent non-invasive testing. The mean age of the patients in Group 2 was higher than that of the patients in Group 1 (35.64 ± 4.74 vs. 31.04 ± 4.15 years, P < 0.001). The basal LH and AMH levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (4.30 ± 2.68 vs. 3.40 ± 1.88, P = 0.003; 5.55 ± 11.22 vs. 4.09 ± 3.55, P = 0.012), but the clinical outcomes were not significantly different. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing invasive testing were similar to those of patients undergoing non-invasive testing with the same PGT indication.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that non-invasive pregnancy testing is a suitable alternative option for detecting the foetal chromosomal status in a PGT cycle. However, the usefulness of non-invasive testing in PGT-M patients is still limited.

Preimplantation genetic testing: A remarkable history of pioneering, technical challenges, innovations, and ethical considerations

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has emerged as a powerful companion to assisted reproduction technologies. The origins and history of PGT are reviewed here, along with descriptions of advances in molecular assays and sampling methods, their capabilities, and their applications in preventing genetic diseases and enhancing pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, the potential for increasing accuracy and genome coverage is considered, as well as some of the emerging ethical and legislative considerations related to the expanding capabilities of PGT.

Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.

Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance

The use of novel technologies in the selection of embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has the potential to improve the chances of pregnancy and birth of a healthy child. However, it is important to be aware of the potential risks and unintended consequences that may arise from the premature implementation of these technologies. This article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the use of novel embryo selection technologies in IVF, including the growing uptake of genetic testing and others, and argues that prioritising embryos for transfer using these technologies is acceptable, but discarding embryos based on unproven advances is not. Several historical examples are provided, which demonstrate possible harms, where the overall chance of pregnancy may have been reduced, and some patients may have missed out on biological parenthood altogether. We emphasise the need for caution and a balanced approach to ensure that the benefits of these technologies outweigh any potential harm. We also highlight the primacy of patients' autonomy in reproductive decision-making, especially when information gained by utilising novel technologies is imprecise.