1
|
Albano D, Cintioli R, Messina C, Serpi F, Gitto S, Mascitti L, Vignati G, Glielmo P, Vitali P, Zagra L, Snoj Ž, Sconfienza LM. US-Guided Interventional Procedures for Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3976. [PMID: 38999539 PMCID: PMC11242179 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
In patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with recurrent pain, symptoms may be caused by several conditions involving not just the joint, but also the surrounding soft tissues including tendons, muscles, bursae, and peripheral nerves. US and US-guided interventional procedures are important tools in the diagnostic work-up of patients with painful THA given that it is possible to reach a prompt diagnosis both directly identifying the pathological changes of periprosthetic structures and indirectly evaluating the response and pain relief to local injection of anesthetics under US monitoring. Then, US guidance can be used for the aspiration of fluid from the joint or periarticular collections, or alternatively to follow the biopsy needle to collect samples for culture analysis in the suspicion of prosthetic joint infection. Furthermore, US-guided percutaneous interventions may be used to treat several conditions with well-established minimally invasive procedures that involve injections of corticosteroid, local anesthetics, and platelet-rich plasma or other autologous products. In this review, we will discuss the clinical and technical applications of US-guided percutaneous interventional procedures in painful THA that can be used in routine daily practice for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Chirurgiche ed Odontoiatriche, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Cintioli
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Serpi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gitto
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Mascitti
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Vignati
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Glielmo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Vitali
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Zagra
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
| | - Žiga Snoj
- Clinical Radiology Institute, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGill KC, Baal JD, Bucknor MD. Update on musculoskeletal applications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00256-024-04620-8. [PMID: 38363419 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04620-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive, incisionless, radiation-free technology used to ablate tissue deep within the body. This technique has gained increased popularity following FDA approval for treatment of pain related to bone metastases and limited approval for treatment of osteoid osteoma. MRgFUS delivers superior visualization of soft tissue targets in unlimited imaging planes and precision in targeting and delivery of thermal dose which is all provided during real-time monitoring using MR thermometry. This paper provides an overview of the common musculoskeletal applications of MRgFUS along with updates on clinical outcomes and discussion of future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C McGill
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Joe D Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Matthew D Bucknor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Suite M391, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gunderman A, Montayre R, Ranjan A, Chen Y. Review of Robot-Assisted HIFU Therapy. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:3707. [PMID: 37050766 PMCID: PMC10098661 DOI: 10.3390/s23073707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of current robot-assisted high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) systems for image-guided therapies. HIFU is a minimally invasive technique that relies on the thermo-mechanical effects of focused ultrasound waves to perform clinical treatments, such as tumor ablation, mild hyperthermia adjuvant to radiation or chemotherapy, vein occlusion, and many others. HIFU is typically performed under ultrasound (USgHIFU) or magnetic resonance imaging guidance (MRgHIFU), which provide intra-operative monitoring of treatment outcomes. Robot-assisted HIFU probe manipulation provides precise HIFU focal control to avoid damage to surrounding sensitive anatomy, such as blood vessels, nerve bundles, or adjacent organs. These clinical and technical benefits have promoted the rapid adoption of robot-assisted HIFU in the past several decades. This paper aims to present the recent developments of robot-assisted HIFU by summarizing the key features and clinical applications of each system. The paper concludes with a comparison and discussion of future perspectives on robot-assisted HIFU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Gunderman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| | - Rudy Montayre
- Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Ashish Ranjan
- Department of Physiological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Slotman DJ, Bartels MMTJ, Ferrer CJ, Bos C, Bartels LW, Boomsma MF, Phernambucq ECJ, Nijholt IM, Morganti AG, Siepe G, Buwenge M, Grüll H, Bratke G, Yeo SY, Blanco Sequeiros R, Minn H, Huhtala M, Napoli A, De Felice F, Catalano C, Bazzocchi A, Gasperini C, Campanacci L, Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Müller D, Braat MNGJA, Moonen C, Verkooijen HM. Focused Ultrasound and RadioTHERapy for non-invasive palliative pain treatment in patients with bone metastasis: a study protocol for the three armed randomized controlled FURTHER trial. Trials 2022; 23:1061. [PMID: 36582001 PMCID: PMC9798627 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06942-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-induced bone pain (CIBP), caused by bone metastases, is a common complication of cancer and strongly impairs quality of life (QoL). External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the current standard of care for treatment of CIBP. However, approximately 45% of patients have no adequate pain response after EBRT. Magnetic resonance image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) may improve pain palliation in this patient population. The main objective of this trial was to compare MR-HIFU, EBRT, and MR-HIFU + EBRT for the palliative treatment of bone metastases. METHODS/DESIGN The FURTHER trial is an international multicenter, three-armed randomized controlled trial. A total of 216 patients with painful bone metastases will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive EBRT only, MR-HIFU only, or combined treatment with EBRT followed by MR-HIFU. During a follow-up period of 6 months, patients will be contacted at eight time points to retrieve information about their level of pain, QoL, and the occurrence of (serious) adverse events. The primary outcome of the trial is pain response at 14 days after start of treatment. Secondary outcomes include pain response at 14 days after trial enrolment, pain scores (daily until the 21st day and at 4, 6, 12 and 24 weeks), toxicity, adverse events, QoL, and survival. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION The FURTHER trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MR-HIFU-alone or in combination with EBRT-compared to EBRT to relieve CIBP. The trial will be performed in six hospitals in four European countries, all of which are partners in the FURTHER consortium. TRIAL REGISTRATION The FURTHER trial is registered under the Netherlands Trials Register number NL71303.041.19 and ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT04307914. Date of trial registration is 13-01-2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derk J. Slotman
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,grid.452600.50000 0001 0547 5927Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Marcia M. T. J. Bartels
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cyril J. Ferrer
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Clemens Bos
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W. Bartels
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn F. Boomsma
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands ,grid.452600.50000 0001 0547 5927Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Erik C. J. Phernambucq
- grid.452600.50000 0001 0547 5927Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M. Nijholt
- grid.452600.50000 0001 0547 5927Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Alessio G. Morganti
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy ,grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Holger Grüll
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Grischa Bratke
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sin Yuin Yeo
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roberto Blanco Sequeiros
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XDepartment of Radiology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- grid.1374.10000 0001 2097 1371Department of Oncology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Mira Huhtala
- grid.1374.10000 0001 2097 1371Department of Oncology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Alessandro Napoli
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Catalano
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Gasperini
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Campanacci
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 66413Rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- grid.6190.e0000 0000 8580 3777Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Manon N. G. J. A. Braat
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chrit Moonen
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M. Verkooijen
- grid.7692.a0000000090126352Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yeo SY, Bratke G, Grüll H. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Bone Malignancies-20 Years of History. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010108. [PMID: 36612105 PMCID: PMC9817683 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is the only non-invasive method for percutaneous thermal ablation of tissue, with treatments typically performed either under magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound guidance. Since this method allows efficient heating of bony structures, it has found not only early use in treatment of bone pain, but also in local treatment of malignant bone tumors. This review of 20 years of published studies shows that HIFU is a very efficient method for rapid pain relief, can provide local tumor control and has a very patient-friendly safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sin Yuin Yeo
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Grischa Bratke
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Holger Grüll
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cologne, Greinstr. 6, 50939 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith AE, Muralidharan A, Smith MT. Prostate cancer induced bone pain: pathobiology, current treatments and pain responses from recent clinical trials. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:108. [PMID: 36258057 PMCID: PMC9579264 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00569-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastatic spread of prostate cancer to the skeleton may result in debilitating bone pain. In this review, we address mechanisms underpinning the pathobiology of metastatic prostate cancer induced bone pain (PCIBP) that include sensitization and sprouting of primary afferent sensory nerve fibres in bone. We also review current treatments and pain responses evoked by various treatment modalities in clinical trials in this patient population. METHODS We reviewed the literature using PubMed to identify research on the pathobiology of PCIBP. Additionally, we reviewed clinical trials of various treatment modalities in patients with PCIBP with pain response outcomes published in the past 7 years. RESULTS Recent clinical trials show that radionuclides, given either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, evoked favourable pain responses in many patients and a single fraction of local external beam radiation therapy was as effective as multiple fractions. However, treatment with chemotherapy, small molecule inhibitors and/or immunotherapy agents, produced variable pain responses but pain response was the primary endpoint in only one of these trials. Additionally, there were no published trials of potentially novel analgesic agents in patients with PCIBP. CONCLUSION There is a knowledge gap for clinical trials of chemotherapy, small molecule inhibitors and/or immunotherapy in patients with PCIBP where pain response is the primary endpoint. Also, there are no novel analgesic agents on the horizon for the relief of PCIBP and this is an area of large unmet medical need that warrants concerted research attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. E. Smith
- St Vincent’s Hospital, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - A. Muralidharan
- Neurobiology of Chronic Pain, The Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - M. T. Smith
- Centre for Integrated Preclinical Drug Development, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koirala N, Joshi J, Duffy SF, McLennan G. Percutaneous-Reinforced Osteoplasty: A Review of Emerging Treatment Strategies for Bone Interventions. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195572. [PMID: 36233434 PMCID: PMC9571370 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous-reinforced osteoplasty is currently being investigated as a possible therapeutic procedure for fracture stabilization in high-risk patients, primarily in patients with bone metastases or osteoporosis. For these patients, a percutaneous approach, if structurally sound, can provide a viable method for treating bone fractures without the physiologic stress of anesthesia and open surgery. However, the low strength of fixation is a common limitation that requires further refinement in scaffold design and selection of materials, and may potentially benefit from tissue-engineering-based regenerative approaches. Scaffolds that have tissue regenerative properties and low inflammatory response promote rapid healing at the fracture site and are ideal for percutaneous applications. On the other hand, preclinical mechanical tests of fracture-repaired specimens provide key information on restoration strength and long-term stability and enable further design optimization. This review presents an overview of percutaneous-reinforced osteoplasty, emerging treatment strategies for bone repair, and basic concepts of in vitro mechanical characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nischal Koirala
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Jyotsna Joshi
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | - Stephen F. Duffy
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA
| | - Gordon McLennan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Interventional Radiology in the Management of Metastases and Bone Tumors. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123265. [PMID: 35743336 PMCID: PMC9225477 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional Radiology (IR) has experienced an exponential growth in recent years. Technological advances of the last decades have made it possible to use new treatments on a larger scale, with good results in terms of safety and effectiveness. In musculoskeletal field, painful bone metastases are the most common target of IR palliative treatments; however, in selected cases of bone metastases, IR may play a curative role, also in combination with other techniques (surgery, radiation and oncology therapies, etc.). Primary malignant bone tumors are extremely rare compared with secondary bone lesions: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma are the most common; however, the role of interventional radiology in this fiels is marginal. In this review, the main techniques used in interventional radiology were examined, and advantages and limitations illustrated. Techniques of ablation (Radiofrequency, Microwaves, Cryoablation as also magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound), embolization, and Cementoplasty will be described. The techniques of ablation work by destruction of pathological tissue by thermal energy (by an increase of temperature up to 90 °C with the exception of the Cryoablation that works by freezing the tissue up to -40 °C). Embolization creates an ischemic necrosis by the occlusion of the arterial vessels that feed the tumor. Finally, cementoplasty has the aim of strengthening bone segment weakened by the growth of pathological tissue through the injection of cement. The results of the treatments performed so far were also assessed and presented focused the attention on the management of bone metastasis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pagnotti GM, Trivedi T, Mohammad KS. Translational Strategies to Target Metastatic Bone Disease. Cells 2022; 11:cells11081309. [PMID: 35455987 PMCID: PMC9030480 DOI: 10.3390/cells11081309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic bone disease is a common and devastating complication to cancer, confounding treatments and recovery efforts and presenting a significant barrier to de-escalating the adverse outcomes associated with disease progression. Despite significant advances in the field, bone metastases remain presently incurable and contribute heavily to cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. Mechanisms associated with metastatic bone disease perpetuation and paralleled disruption of bone remodeling are highlighted to convey how they provide the foundation for therapeutic targets to stem disease escalation. The focus of this review aims to describe the preclinical modeling and diagnostic evaluation of metastatic bone disease as well as discuss the range of therapeutic modalities used clinically and how they may impact skeletal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel M. Pagnotti
- Department of Endocrine, Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (G.M.P.); (T.T.)
| | - Trupti Trivedi
- Department of Endocrine, Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (G.M.P.); (T.T.)
| | - Khalid S. Mohammad
- Department of Anatomy and Genetics, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +966-546-810-335
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Electrochemotherapy Is Effective in the Treatment of Bone Metastases. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1672-1682. [PMID: 35323339 PMCID: PMC8947745 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone metastases induce pain, risk of fracture, and neural compression, and reduced mobility and quality of life. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a minimally invasive local treatment based on a high-voltage electric pulse combined with an anticancer drug. Preclinical and clinical studies have supported the use of ECT in patients with metastatic bone disease, demonstrating that it does not damage the mineral structure of the bone and its regenerative capacity, and that is feasible and efficient for the treatment of bone metastases. Since 2009, 88 patients with bone metastasis have received ECT at the Rizzoli Institute. 2014 saw the start of a registry of patients with bone metastases treated with ECT, whose data are recorded in a shared database. We share the Rizzoli Institute experience of 38 patients treated with ECT for a bone metastasis, excluding patients not included in the registry (before 2014) and those treated with bone fixation. Mean follow-up was 2 months (1–52). Response to treatment using RECIST criteria was 29% objective responses, 59% stable disease, and 16% progressive disease. Using PERCIST, the response was 36% OR, 14% SD, and 50% PD with no significant differences between the two criteria. A significant decrease in pain and better quality of life was observed at FU.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lena B, Florkow MC, Ferrer CJ, van Stralen M, Seevinck PR, Vonken EJPA, Boomsma MF, Slotman DJ, Viergever MA, Moonen CTW, Bos C, Bartels LW. Synthetic CT for the planning of MR-HIFU treatment of bone metastases in pelvic and femoral bones: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4537-4546. [PMID: 35190891 PMCID: PMC9213310 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08568-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Visualization of the bone distribution is an important prerequisite for MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRI-HIFU) treatment planning of bone metastases. In this context, we evaluated MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) imaging for the visualization of cortical bone. Methods MR and CT images of nine patients with pelvic and femoral metastases were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The metastatic lesions were osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed. sCT were generated from pre-treatment or treatment MR images using a UNet-like neural network. sCT was qualitatively and quantitatively compared to CT in the bone (pelvis or femur) containing the metastasis and in a region of interest placed on the metastasis itself, through mean absolute difference (MAD), mean difference (MD), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and root mean square surface distance (RMSD). Results The dataset consisted of 3 osteolytic, 4 osteoblastic and 2 mixed metastases. For most patients, the general morphology of the bone was well represented in the sCT images and osteolytic, osteoblastic and mixed lesions could be discriminated. Despite an average timespan between MR and CT acquisitions of 61 days, in bone, the average (± standard deviation) MAD was 116 ± 26 HU, MD − 14 ± 66 HU, DSC 0.85 ± 0.05, and RMSD 2.05 ± 0.48 mm and, in the lesion, MAD was 132 ± 62 HU, MD − 31 ± 106 HU, DSC 0.75 ± 0.2, and RMSD 2.73 ± 2.28 mm. Conclusions Synthetic CT images adequately depicted the cancellous and cortical bone distribution in the different lesion types, which shows its potential for MRI-HIFU treatment planning. Key Points • Synthetic computed tomography was able to depict bone distribution in metastatic lesions. • Synthetic computed tomography images intrinsically aligned with treatment MR images may have the potential to facilitate MR-HIFU treatment planning of bone metastases, by combining visualization of soft tissues and cancellous and cortical bone. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08568-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Lena
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mateusz C Florkow
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cyril J Ferrer
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan, 100 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marijn van Stralen
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,MRIguidance BV, Gildstraat 91-A, 3572, EL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter R Seevinck
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,MRIguidance BV, Gildstraat 91-A, 3572, EL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan P A Vonken
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan, 100 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn F Boomsma
- Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025, AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Derk J Slotman
- Department of Radiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025, AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Max A Viergever
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chrit T W Moonen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan, 100 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Clemens Bos
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan, 100 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W Bartels
- Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Q.02.4.45, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bucknor MD, Baal JD, McGill KC, Infosino A, Link TM. Musculoskeletal Applications of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25:725-734. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMagnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel noninvasive therapy that uses focused sound energy to thermally ablate focal pathology within the body. In the United States, MRgFUS is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of uterine fibroids, palliation of painful bone metastases, and thalamotomy for the treatment of essential tremor. However, it has also demonstrated utility for the treatment of a wide range of additional musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions that currently are treated as off-label indications. Advantages of the technology include the lack of ionizing radiation, the completely noninvasive technique, and the precise targeting that offer unprecedented control of the delivery of the thermal dose, as well as real-time monitoring capability with MR thermometry. In this review, we describe the most common MSK applications of MRgFUS: palliation of bone metastases, treatment of osteoid osteomas, desmoid tumors, facet arthropathy, and other developing indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Bucknor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Joe D. Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kevin C. McGill
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew Infosino
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Thomas M. Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baal JD, Chen WC, Baal U, Wagle S, Baal JH, Link TM, Bucknor MD. Efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:2459-2469. [PMID: 34018007 PMCID: PMC8536557 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03822-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) in the treatment of painful bone metastases through a systematic review and meta-analysis of pain scores before and after MRgFUS treatment and post-treatment adverse events. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed for studies evaluating the efficacy and/or safety of MRgFUS. The mean difference of pain scores (10-point visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale) between baseline and 1-month/3-month pain scores was collected and analyzed in a pooled meta-analysis. Post-treatment adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading were recorded and the pooled prevalence was calculated. RESULTS A total of 33 studies published between 2007 and 2019 were collected, resulting in a total sample size of 1082 patients. The majority of the studies were prospective with a reported follow-up period of 3 months. The pooled proportion of patients that achieved pain relief from MRgFUS (complete response or partial response [≥ 2-point improvement of pain score]) was 79% (95% CI 73-83%). The pooled 1-month and 3-month mean difference in pain score were - 3.8 (95% CI - 4.3; - 3.3) and - 4.4 (95% CI - 5.0; - 3.7), respectively. The overall rate of high-grade (CTCAE grade 3 or higher) and low-grade (CTCAE grade 2 or lower) MRgFUS-related adverse events were 0.9% and 5.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION MRgFUS is an effective procedure that is able to provide significant pain palliation for patients with symptomatic bone metastases with a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe D. Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
| | - William C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ulysis Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
| | - Sagar Wagle
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Jed H. Baal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
| | - Thomas M. Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
| | - Matthew D. Bucknor
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Lobby 6, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Han X, Huang R, Meng T, Yin H, Song D. The Roles of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Pain Relief in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:617295. [PMID: 34458131 PMCID: PMC8387143 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Cancer pain, the most common skeleton-related event of bone metastases, significantly disturbs patients' life. MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a therapeutic option to relieve pain; however, its efficacy and safety have not been fully explored. Therefore, we aim to conduct a meta-analysis on studies reporting MRgFUS for patients with bone metastases. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCTs on MRgFUS treatment for patients with bone metastases were collected using PubMed, MEDLINE In-Process (US National Library of Medicine), National Institutes of Health (US National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library between August 2007 and September 2019. Data on quantitative pain assessment before/after MRgFUS, response rate, and complication were extracted and analyzed. Results Fifteen eligible studies with 362 patients were selected in this meta-analysis. The average pain score was 6.74 (95% CI: 6.30-7.18) at baseline, 4.15 (95% CI: 3.31-4.99) at 0-1 week, 3.09 (95% CI: 2.46-3.72) at 1-5 weeks, and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.37-3.19) at 5-14 weeks. Compared with baseline, the pain improvement at 0-1 week was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.92-3.16, p < 0.01), at 1-5 weeks was 3.56 (95% CI: 3.11-4.02, p < 0.01), and at 5-14 weeks was 4.22 (95% CI: 3.68-4.76, p < 0.01). Change from baseline in OMEDD at 2 weeks after treatment was -15.11 (95% CI: -34.73, 4.50), at 1 month after treatment was -10.87 (95% CI: -26.32, 4.58), and at 3 months after treatment was -5.53 (95% CI: -20.44, 9.38). The overall CR rate was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.24-0.48), PR rate was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.36-0.58), and NR rate was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34). Among 14 studies including 352 patients, 93 (26.4%) patients with minor complications and 5 (1.42%) patients with major complications were recorded. Conclusion This meta-analysis identifies MRgFUS as a reliable therapeutic option to relieve cancer pain for patients with metastatic bone tumors with controllable related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaying Han
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Runzhi Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.,Division of Spine, Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tong Meng
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huabin Yin
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dianwen Song
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sanchez M, Barrere V, Treilleux I, Chopin N, Melodelima D. Development of a noninvasive HIFU treatment for breast adenocarcinomas using a toroidal transducer based on preliminary attenuation measurements. ULTRASONICS 2021; 115:106459. [PMID: 33990009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer among women. For the last fifteen years, treatments that are less invasive than lumpectomy, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy, have been developed, with encouraging results. In this study, a toroidal HIFU transducer was used to create lesions of at least 2 cm in diameter within less than one minute of treatment. The toroidal HIFU transducer created two focal zones that led to large, fast and homogeneous ablations (10.5 cc/min). The experiments were conducted in 30 human samples of normal breast tissues recovered from mastectomies to measure acoustic attenuation (N = 30), and then, HIFU lesions were created (N = 15). Eight HIFU ablations were performed to evaluate the reproducibility of the lesions. HIFU lesions were created in 45 s with a toroidal HIFU transducer working at 2.5 MHz. The longest and shortest axes of the HIFU lesions were 21.7 ± 3.1 mm and 23.5 ± 3.3 mm respectively, corresponding to an average volume of 7.3 ± 1.4 cm3. These HIFU lesions were performed at an average depth of 19.0 ± 1.5 mm, while the integrity of the skin was preserved. The HIFU-treated breast tissues had a higher level of attenuation (0.57 ± 0.11 Np.cm-1.MHz-1) when compared to the untreated tissues (0.21 ± 0.04 Np.cm-1.MHz-1). This study shows the feasibility of a fast and fully noninvasive treatment using a toroidal transducer for breast tumors measuring up to 15 mm in diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Sanchez
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003 Lyon, France
| | - V Barrere
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003 Lyon, France
| | | | - N Chopin
- Centre Léon Bérard, F-69008 Lyon, France
| | - D Melodelima
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, F-69003 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barrere V, Sanchez M, Cambronero S, Dupré A, Rivoire M, Melodelima D. Evaluation of Ultrasonic Attenuation in Primary and Secondary Human Liver Tumors and Its Potential Effect on High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 47:1761-1774. [PMID: 33895037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Primary and secondary liver tumors are completely different diseases but are usually treated similarly using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). However, the acoustic parameters of these tissues are not well documented. In this study, attenuation coefficients were evaluated in fresh primary (N = 8) and secondary (N = 13) human liver tumor samples recovered by hepatectomy. The average attenuation coefficients of the primary and secondary liver tumors were 0.10 ± 0.03 and 0.20 ± 0.04 Np/cm/MHz, respectively. The average attenuation coefficients of the liver tissue surrounding the primary and secondary tumors were 0.16 ± 0.07 and 0.07 ± 0.02 Np/cm/MHz, respectively. Numerical simulations performed using these values revealed that completely different HIFU ablation patterns were created in primary and secondary liver tumors using the same exposure parameters. The dimensions of a typical HIFU lesion were two times larger in secondary liver tumors than in primary tumors. HIFU treatment parameters should be set properly according to the acoustic properties of the diseased liver tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Barrere
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marine Sanchez
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Cambronero
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Aurelien Dupré
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Rivoire
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - David Melodelima
- LabTAU, INSERM, Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lin X, Chen W, Wei F. Technique Success, Technique Efficacy and Complications of HIFU Ablation for Palliation of Pain in Patients With Bone Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of 28 Feasibility Studies. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 47:1182-1191. [PMID: 33583637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Several feasibility studies have reported that high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation can be applied to ease patients' bone pain. However, the effect of HIFU ablation to palliate bone pain remains unclear. To evaluate the technique's success, efficacy, minor complication and major complication on patients suffering from bone pain, we searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from January 1998 to March 2019. Clinical studies that have assessed the association between bone pain and HIFU ablation were involved. We filtered out 28 feasibility studies, which reported the association between HIFU ablation and bone pain, including a total of 717 patients and 736 bone lesions. Overall, our results indicate that the rate of technique success of HIFU ablation was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 89%-96%) for patients with bone lesions. The technique efficacy rate of HIFU ablation for palliation of pain from bone lesions was 80% (95% CI 74%-87%) in all the patients, 96% (91%-100%) in the subgroup of retrospective studies and 77% (69%-85%) in the subgroup of prospective studies. In regard to HIFU ablation treatment safety, the hazard ratio for minor complication was 12% (95% CI 7%-17%), and the hazard ratio for major complication was 2% (95% CI 1%-3%). In conclusion, the summary rates for various considerations of using HIFU ablation for the palliation of bone pain are as follows: technique success is 93%, technique efficacy is 77%, minor complication is 12% and major complication is 2%. Our results suggest that extracorporeal HIFU ablation is a promising method for palliation of pain in bone lesions, with high technique success and efficacy, but low adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoti Lin
- Department of Breast, Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children's Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Weiyu Chen
- Department of Physiology, Zhongshan Medical School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fengqin Wei
- Department of Emergency, Fujian Provincial 2nd People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Joiner JB, Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Dayton PA. Focused Ultrasound for Immunomodulation of the Tumor Microenvironment. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2021; 205:2327-2341. [PMID: 33077668 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Focused ultrasound (FUS) has recently emerged as a modulator of the tumor microenvironment, paving the way for FUS to become a safe yet formidable cancer treatment option. Several mechanisms have been proposed for the role of FUS in facilitating immune responses and overcoming drug delivery barriers. However, with the wide variety of FUS parameters used in diverse tumor types, it is challenging to pinpoint FUS specifications that may elicit the desired antitumor response. To clarify FUS bioeffects, we summarize four mechanisms of action, including thermal ablation, hyperthermia/thermal stress, mechanical perturbation, and histotripsy, each inducing unique vascular and immunological effects. Notable tumor responses to FUS include enhanced vascular permeability, increased T cell infiltration, and tumor growth suppression. In this review, we have categorized and reviewed recent methods of using therapeutic ultrasound to elicit an antitumor immune response with examples that reveal specific solutions and challenges in this new research area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan B Joiner
- Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| | - Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and
| | - Paul A Dayton
- Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; .,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and.,Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scandiffio R, Bozzi E, Ezeldin M, Capanna R, Ceccoli M, Colangeli S, Donati DM, Colangeli M. Image-guided Cryotherapy for Musculoskeletal Tumors. Curr Med Imaging 2021; 17:166-178. [PMID: 32842945 DOI: 10.2174/1573405616666200825162712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article represents a review of the use of image-guided cryotherapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal tumor lesions. Cryotherapy is able to induce a lethal effect on cancer cells through direct and indirect mechanisms. In this manuscript, we combined our experience with that of other authors who have published on this topic in order to provide indications on when to use cryotherapy in musculoskeletal oncology. DISCUSSION Image-Guided percutaneous cryotherapy is a therapeutic method now widely accepted in the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. It can be used both for palliative treatments of metastatic bone lesions and for the curative treatment of benign bone tumors, such as osteoid osteoma or osteoblastoma. In the treatment of bone metastases, cryotherapy plays a major role in alleviating or resolving disease-related pain, but it has also been demonstrated that it can have a role in local disease control. In recent years, the use of cryotherapy has also expanded for the treatment of both benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. CONCLUSION Percutaneous cryotherapy can be considered a safe and effective technique in the treatment of benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors. Cryotherapy can be considered the first option in benign tumor lesions, such as osteoid osteoma, and a valid alternative to radiofrequency ablation. In the treatment of painful bone metastases, it must be considered secondarily to other standard treatments (radiotherapy, bisphosphonate therapy, and chemotherapy) when they are no longer effective in controlling the disease or when they cannot be repeated (for example, radiotherapy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossella Scandiffio
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elena Bozzi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mohamed Ezeldin
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt
| | - Rodolfo Capanna
- 2nd Orthopedic Division, Department Of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Matteo Ceccoli
- 2nd Orthopedic Division, Department Of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Simone Colangeli
- 2nd Orthopedic Division, Department Of Translational Research and New Technology in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Davide M Donati
- Department of Musculo-Skeletal Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Colangeli
- Department of Musculo-Skeletal Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bartels MMTJ, Verpalen IM, Ferrer CJ, Slotman DJ, Phernambucq ECJ, Verhoeff JJC, Eppinga WSC, Braat MNGJA, van den Hoed RD, van 't Veer-Ten Kate M, de Boer E, Naber HR, Nijholt IM, Bartels LW, Bos C, Moonen CTW, Boomsma MF, Verkooijen HM. Combining radiotherapy and focused ultrasound for pain palliation of cancer induced bone pain; a stage I/IIa study according to the IDEAL framework. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:57-63. [PMID: 33532631 PMCID: PMC7822778 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Combined treatment of EBRT and MR-HIFU is feasible and well tolerated by patients. Clinical outcomes of combined treatment of EBRT and MR-HIFU are promising. Superiority of combined treatment over standard EBRT needs to be evaluated in a comparative study.
Background Cancer induced bone pain (CIBP) strongly interferes with patient’s quality of life. Currently, the standard of care includes external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), resulting in pain relief in approximately 60% of patients. Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is a promising treatment modality for CIBP. Methods A single arm, R-IDEAL stage I/IIa study was conducted. Patients presenting at the department of radiation oncology with symptomatic bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton, as well as in the sacrum and sternum were eligible for inclusion. All participants underwent EBRT, followed by MR-HIFU within 4 days. Safety and feasibility were assessed, and pain scores were monitored for 4 weeks after completing the combined treatment. Results Six patients were enrolled. Median age was 67 years, median lesion diameter was 56,5 mm. In all patients it was logistically possible to plan and perform the MR-HIFU treatment within 4 days after EBRT. All patients tolerated the combined procedure well. Pain response was reported by 5 out of 6 patients at 7 days after completion of the combined treatment, and stabilized on 60% at 4 weeks follow up. No treatment related serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion This is the first study to combine EBRT with MR-HIFU. Our results show that combined EBRT and MR-HIFU in first-line treatment of CIBP is safe and feasible, and is well tolerated by patients. Superiority over standard EBRT, in terms of (time to) pain relief and quality of life need to be evaluated in comparative (randomized) study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia M T J Bartels
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inez M Verpalen
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Cyril J Ferrer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Derk J Slotman
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Erik C J Phernambucq
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S C Eppinga
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf D van den Hoed
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - Erwin de Boer
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Harry R Naber
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M Nijholt
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus W Bartels
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Clemens Bos
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Chrit T W Moonen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Image Sciences Institute, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn F Boomsma
- Isala Hospital, Department of Radiology, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wei HJ, Upadhyayula PS, Pouliopoulos AN, Englander ZK, Zhang X, Jan CI, Guo J, Mela A, Zhang Z, Wang TJC, Bruce JN, Canoll PD, Feldstein NA, Zacharoulis S, Konofagou EE, Wu CC. Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Increases Delivery and Efficacy of Etoposide for Glioblastoma Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 110:539-550. [PMID: 33346092 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating disease. With the current treatment of surgery followed by chemoradiation, outcomes remain poor, with median survival of only 15 months and a 5-year survival rate of 6.8%. A challenge in treating GBM is the heterogeneous integrity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which limits the bioavailability of systemic therapies to the brain. There is a growing interest in enhancing drug delivery by opening the BBB with the use of focused ultrasound (FUS). We hypothesize that an FUS-mediated BBB opening can enhance the delivery of etoposide for a therapeutic benefit in GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS A murine glioma cell line (Pdgf+, Pten-/-, P53-/-) was orthotopically injected into B6(Cg)-Tyrc-2J/J mice to establish the syngeneic GBM model for this study. Animals were treated with FUS and microbubbles to open the BBB to enhance the delivery of systemic etoposide. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used to evaluate the BBB opening and tumor progression. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure etoposide concentrations in the intracranial tumors. RESULTS The murine glioma cell line is sensitive to etoposide in vitro. MR imaging and passive cavitation detection demonstrate the safe and successful BBB opening with FUS. The combined treatment of an FUS-mediated BBB opening and etoposide decreased tumor growth by 45% and prolonged median overall survival by 6 days: an approximately 30% increase. The FUS-mediated BBB opening increased the brain tumor-to-serum ratio of etoposide by 3.5-fold and increased the etoposide concentration in brain tumor tissue by 8-fold compared with treatment without ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS The current study demonstrates that BBB opening with FUS increases intratumoral delivery of etoposide in the brain, resulting in local control and overall survival benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Jian Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Pavan S Upadhyayula
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Zachary K Englander
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Xu Zhang
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Chia-Ing Jan
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Translational Cell Therapy Center, Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jia Guo
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Angeliki Mela
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Zhiguo Zhang
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey N Bruce
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter D Canoll
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil A Feldstein
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Stergios Zacharoulis
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Elisa E Konofagou
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Cheng-Chia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|