Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing advance care planning in prisons: a rapid literature review

Advance Care Planning: Perspectives of People Living in Prison

A person-centered approach to advance care planning is recognized as a fundamental need, yet its routine implementation remains a challenge across disparate settings, such as prisons. The purpose of this study was to gain the perspectives of people who are incarcerated about advance care planning. Four focus groups were conducted with people living in 1 men's and 1 women's state prison (n = 26). Handwritten field notes were taken, transcribed, deidentified, and verified before the completion of independent thematic analysis by 2 experienced qualitative researchers. Key themes regarding advance care planning were identified: components of advance care planning, initiation and continuation of advance care planning, barriers to implementing advance care planning, and facilitators to implementing advance care planning. Participants noted several key components related to the name, structure, and content of advance care planning programs. Insights about who should initiate the conversation, when to continue the conversation, and how to deliver education about advance care planning were obtained. Findings contribute to identifying best practices for infusing advance care planning into prisons. Best practices will inform the development of a toolkit of contextually relevant, person-centered approaches to advance care planning that are tailored to meet the unique needs of people who are incarcerated.

Public perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) from an international perspective: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Advance Care Planning (ACP) helps people discuss personal values, goals and priorities regarding future care with family and professionals. It can support care coordination and guide decision-making as health deteriorates. However, uptake remains low internationally. Poor communication and information due to Covid-19 pressures exacerbated public and professional criticism and concerns. Recent recommendations highlight the importance of understanding and addressing public perceptions about ACP combined with person-centred approaches to ACP conversations.

OBJECTIVES

To explore public perceptions of ACP to inform increased public engagement and empowerment.

METHODS

Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was applied in a rapid scoping review. Three databases (Embase, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo) were searched for English language reviews and primary or secondary research studies from 2015 to 2021. Following title and abstract review, two researchers screened full-text articles and performed data extraction independently using Covidence. Charted data were analysed for themes and subthemes starting with two recent published reviews. Emerging findings were added and data synthesis reviewed by the research team, including public-patient representatives, to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

Of 336 studies, 20 included reviews and research papers represented diverse public views, situations and contexts. Studies found poor public knowledge of ACP and widespread perceptions of confusing or accessible information. Multiple reports described little personal relevance, perceived risks of emotional distress, fears, mistrust and misconceptions about the purpose and scope of ACP. Studies identified public concerns stemming from reluctance to discuss death and dying despite this being just one aspect of ACP. Research with minority communities and marginalised groups found intensified concerns. Some studies cited people who valued maintaining autonomy by expressing their goals and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies reviewed found many members of the public had negative or unclear perceptions of ACP. Improved knowledge and understanding appeared to influence perceptions of ACP but were not considered sufficient to change behaviours. The research provided valuable insights from members of the public that could inform current professional and societal debates about the future of ACP. Findings point to a need for novel approaches to ACP public information and involvement whilst bearing in mind societal norms, diverse cultures and contexts.

Advance care planning ahead of life-altering clinical deterioration in secure settings: Do not wait until a crisis

All professionals involved in someone's care should be equipped to support individuals, and the people close to them, to understand how their health is likely to change, consider the burdens and likely outcomes of treatment options and make realistic, informed recommendations to guide future care. This can be particularly challenging in forensic mental health, when it covers cardiopulmonary resuscitation alongside recommendations about acute hospital admission and medical escalation within and outside of hospital settings. Some clinicians question whether or not the harms of raising the spectre of invasive ventilation and potential mortality risks unnecessary anxiety and psychological harm amongst detained patients. Instead, we argue that timely advance care and treatment escalation planning with each patient, informed by psychiatric clinicians, is long overdue.

Care for Incarcerated Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped health care delivery for all patients but has distinctly affected the most marginalized people in society. Incarcerated patients are both more likely to be infected and more likely to die from COVID-19. There is a paucity of guidance for the care of incarcerated patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This article will discuss how patient privacy, adequate communication, and advance care planning are rights that incarcerated patients may not experience during this pandemic. We highlight the role of compassionate release and note how COVID-19 may affect this prospect. A number of pragmatic recommendations are made to attenuate the discrepancy in hospital care experienced by those admitted from prisons and jails. Physicians must be familiar with the relevant hospital policies, be prepared to adapt their practices in order to overcome barriers to care, such as continuous shackling, and advocate to change these policies when they conflict with patient care. Stigma, isolation, and concerns over staff safety are shared experiences for COVID-19 and incarcerated patients, but incarcerated patients have been experiencing this treatment long before the current pandemic. It is crucial that the internist demand the equitable care that we seek for all our patients.