Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: a worldwide perspective

Real-world outcomes in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria receiving omalizumab: insights from a clinical practice survey

OBJECTIVE

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating inflammatory skin condition, often impacting quality of life. International guidelines recommend omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, for second-line treatment. Our objective was to understand patient characteristics associated with prescription of omalizumab, and assess real-world outcomes in patients with CSU treated with omalizumab.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Adelphi Real World CSU Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data collection (December 2020-October 2021) from physicians and patients with CSU in the United States.

RESULTS

Data from allergists (n = 45), dermatologists (n = 51), and primary care physicians (PCPs; n = 20) were included. At the time of data collection, one-third of patients were receiving omalizumab (n = 220) and 67% were eligible for but not receiving omalizumab (n = 455). Using logistic regression, the odds of receiving omalizumab were higher in patients whose entire bodies were affected by hives [odds ratio (OR) = 2.551; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.502-4.333; p < 0.001] or with deteriorating/unstable prognoses at treatment initiation [OR = 2.219; 95% CI 1.031-4.777; p = 0.042], and lower in patients managed by PCPs [OR = 0.276; 95% CI 0.130-0.584; p < 0.001]. Estimates from an inverse probability weighted regression adjustment model indicated that patients receiving omalizumab had higher treatment satisfaction, improvements in itching, hives, angioedema, insomnia, and anxiety, and lower impact on work productivity, compared with patients not receiving omalizumab.

CONCLUSION

Around two-thirds of patients with CSU considered eligible for omalizumab were not receiving the guideline-recommended therapy. Patients receiving omalizumab had better real-world outcomes compared with patients not receiving omalizumab. Ensuring patients receive the most appropriate treatment could benefit patients with CSU.

A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Managing Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an unpredictable inflammatory skin condition characterized by the spontaneous onset of itchy wheals, angioedema, or both, which occurs for longer than 6 weeks overall. Despite the relatively straightforward diagnostic algorithm for CSU, relying primarily on a detailed medical history and only limited laboratory tests, patients often wait years to be diagnosed, with many cycling through different healthcare practitioners before a diagnosis is made. Even then, current treatment options for CSU are limited, with approximately half of patients resistant to standard-of-care second-generation antihistamines at standard or higher doses. As such, there is an unmet need for improved, streamlined management for patients with CSU. Here, we review the evidence-based diagnostic algorithm for CSU, consider the required steps of the diagnostic workup, and provide practical, real-world advice on the management of CSU to improve the timely diagnosis and care of patients with this debilitating disease.

Disease Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Japan

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), characterized by the recurrence of pruritic hives and/or angioedema for >6 weeks with no identifiable trigger, has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: The objective of this web-based cross-sectional study was to evaluate disease control, disease burden, and treatment satisfaction in Japanese adults with CSU using the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), HRQoL outcomes, and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 items (TSQM-9). Results: In total, 529 adults were included in the analysis (59.9% female), with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) in CSU duration of 13.2 ± 13.0 years. Based on UCT scores, two-thirds of patients had poor (score of 0-7; 23.6%) or insufficient (score of 8-11; 43.3%) symptom control, and one-third had good control (score of 12-16; 33.1%). Overall treatment satisfaction was not high, with mean ± SD TSQM-9 scores of 55.5 ± 17.6% for effectiveness, 68.2 ± 18.8% for convenience, and 59.2 ± 18.4% for global satisfaction. No apparent differences in TSQM-9 scores were observed between patients receiving different medications. HRQoL outcomes were worse among patients with poor/insufficient symptom control. Conclusions: Japanese adults with CSU have a high disease burden, and better treatment options are needed to increase treatment satisfaction.

A Prospective Randomized Non-Blinded Study of Safety and Efficacy of Bilastine Up-Dosing (40 mg) Versus Combination of Bilastine 20 mg With Levocetirizine 5 mg in the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria

Introduction

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is the most commonly diagnosed skin condition in dermatology outpatient departments. Second-generation antihistamines are shown to be effective in the control of CSU. As per the guidelines, a combination of antihistamines is less recommended due to the lack of synergistic effect, though used widely. Exploring effective treatment options are crucial, given the challenges posed by CSU.

Aims and Objectives

To assess the safety and efficacy of Bilastine up-dosing versus combination of 20 mg Bilastine with 5 mg Levocetirizine in the treatment of CSU.

Materials and Methods

This prospective randomized non-blinded comparative trial involved 62 patients, with 32 in group A and 30 in group B. Group A received Tablet Bilastine 20 mg bd, while Group B received a combination of Tablet Bilastine 20 mg and Tablet Levocetirizine 5 mg. Urticarial Activity Score 7 was performed at baseline and follow-up visits (every 2 weeks for 6 weeks).

Results

Both groups had a higher number of male patients in the 20-30 years age group. Angioedema was present in 15.6% of group A and 23.3% in group B. After 6 weeks, both the groups showed a significant improvement in UAS 7 scores (P value <0.05). Group A demonstrated a remarkable reduction in UAS 7 from 19.4% to 0.03% with minimal side effects.

Conclusion

Bilastine up-dosing proved to be efficient, secure, and well tolerated when compared to the combined dose of Levocetirizine 5 mg and Bilastine 20 mg, suggesting that up-dosing of Bilastine could be a valuable addition to the current medication arsenal with the minimal side effects.

Bilastine in Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Disease Control and Cytokine Modulation in an Open-label Prospective Study

Introduction

The treatment options for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) primarily include second generation non-sedative antihistamine (SGAHs). Bilastine is a newer, nonsedating SGAH approved for urticaria in February 2019 by the Drugs Controller General of India. Its major advantages are in terms of superior efficacy, lack of drug interactions and adverse effects, including sedation, compared to conventional SGAHs. The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of CSU is well known. However, there is a shortage of data regarding the change in serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines following H1 antihistamines. We conducted this trial to evaluate the role of bilastine in cytokine modulation and autoimmunity, thereby explaining its role in modifying the disease process in CSU.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary institute in Kolkata on patients aged 12 years and above with a CSU >6 months. These patients had an unsatisfactory response, as per the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7), to previous antihistamine therapies in standard doses. Treatment effectiveness was determined by comparing the UAS7 at baseline with that at weeks 4, 8 and 12. Also, baseline serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-17 were compared with those at the end of the study, that is, 12 weeks.

Results

Thirty patients who matched the inclusion criteria and signed informed consent were included in the study. At the end of 12 weeks, 10% of patients (n = 3) achieved a complete treatment response (UAS = 0), whereas 43.33% of patients (n = 13) were labelled as having well-controlled urticaria (UAS <6). At 12 weeks, the mean UAS7 score (6.47 ± 4.45) was statistically significant compared to the baseline score (25.47 ± 7.74). The mean values of serum IL-6 (pg/ml) and IL-17 (pg/ml) at baseline were 5.96 ± 5.24 pg/ml and 6.96 ± 5.97 pg/ml, respectively. At the end of treatment, that is, 3 months, the mean values were reduced to 4.61 ± 4.56 pg/ml and 5.08 ± 3.87 pg/ml. The reduction was statistically significant for both serum IL-6 (P < 0.001) and IL-17 (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

We conclude that bilastine at a once-daily continuous dose of 40 mg for 3 months is safe and effective in CSU patients who are refractory to treatment at the standard doses of SGAHs. Improved symptomatic control with bilastine was also associated with better control over the inflammatory process, as suggested by the lowering of mean cytokine levels in our study.

Risk calculator of the clinical response to antihistamines in chronic urticaria: Development and internal validation

Early detection of CSU patients with low probability of a clinical response with antihistamines could undergo prompt initiation of therapeutic alternatives. The aim of the study was to develop and internally validate a model for predicting the clinical response to antihistamines in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who consult allergology and dermatology care centers. A cohort of CSU patients, recruited from four participating centers, were followed up for 12 months. Fifteen candidate variables were selected to be included in the multivariate model and then internal validation was done with bootstrap analysis with 1000 simulations. The outcome variable, clinical response to antihistamines, was evaluated with the UAS (Urticaria Activity Score) scale for seven days: "No response to antihistamines" was defined as UAS7 ≥7 points after at least one month with a maximum dose of antihistamines, while "Response to antiH1" was defined as UAS7 ≤6 points for at least three months with the use of antiH1. A total of 790 patients were included. Among the different models analyzed, the model that included age, angioedema, anxiety/depression, time with the disease, NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) intolerance, and UAS7 baseline was considered the one with the best performance (accuracy 0.675, HL 0.87, AUC 0.727). The internal validation analyses demonstrated good consistency of the model. In conclusion, this prediction model identifies the probability of response to antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. The model could be useful for a personalized therapeutic approach according to individual patient risk.

A Patient Charter for Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria (CU) is the recurring development of wheals (aka "hives" or "welts"), angioedema, or both for more than 6 weeks. Wheals and angioedema occur with no definite triggers in chronic spontaneous urticaria, and in response to known and definite physical triggers in chronic inducible urticaria. Approximately 1.4% of individuals globally will have CU during their lifetime. The itching and physical discomfort associated with CU have a profound impact on daily activities, sexual function, work or school performance, and sleep, causing significant impairment in a patient's physical and mental quality of life. CU also places a financial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Patients should feel empowered to self-advocate to receive the best care. The voice of the patient in navigating the journey of CU diagnosis and management may improve patient-provider communication, thereby improving diagnosis and outcomes. A collaboration of patients, providers, advocacy organizations, and pharmaceutical representatives have created a patient charter to define the realistic and achievable principles of care that patients with CU should expect to receive. Principle (1): I deserve an accurate and timely diagnosis of my CU; Principle (2): I deserve access to specialty care for my CU; Principle (3): I deserve access to innovative treatments that reduce the burden of CU on my daily life; Principle (4): I deserve to be free of unnecessary treatment-related side-effects during the management of my CU; and Principle (5): I expect a holistic treatment approach to address all the components of my life impacted by CU. The stated principles may serve as a guide for healthcare providers who care for patients with CU and translate into better patient-physician communication. In addition, we urge policymakers and authors of CU treatment guidelines to consider these principles in their decision-making to ensure the goals of the patient are achievable.

Omalizumab for Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Narrative Review of Current Status

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating inflammatory disorder of the skin, characterized by a fluctuating natural history, a complex mechanism of action, and a significant burden on patients, including effect on quality of life, development of psychosocial disorders, and a range of comorbidities. Recent international guidelines recommend a therapeutic approach of first-line treatment with second generation H1-antihistamines and second-line treatment with the biologic omalizumab. Here, the salient aspects of CSU and current status of data for omalizumab for patients with CSU are reviewed, with a focus on mechanism of action, efficacy and real-world effectiveness (including patient outcomes, response, relapse, and remission), and safety (including consideration of the risk of anaphylaxis). The review also considers recent data on COVID-19, CSU, and omalizumab and presents our perspective on future needs. Overall, the data suggest that omalizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with CSU that provides benefits for a wide range of patients.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: How to Measure It and the Need to Define Treatment Success

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a complex skin disease characterized by the spontaneous appearance of wheals, angioedema, or both, for more than 6 weeks. Many patients experience a relapsing-remitting disease course for years. Owing to the unpredictability of wheal recurrence and the severity of pruritis, patients suffer considerable impairment in their quality of life. Physicians face multiple challenges, not least of which is a lack of clear guidance on what constitutes "treatment success". There is a lack of awareness of which measures should be used to best assess the various aspects of CSU, including disease activity, disease control, and quality of life-which themselves each comprise multiple components-and how to apply the results of each score to treatment decision-making. Although the overarching aim of treatment is for patients to be completely free of signs and symptoms of CSU, a more realistic definition of "treatment success" is needed to guide ongoing, long-term disease management for each individual patient. In this review, we consider what lessons can be learned from the current evidence base to provide further direction toward a universal definition of "treatment success".

Urticaria

Urticaria is an inflammatory skin disorder that affects up to 20% of the world population at some point during their life. It presents with wheals, angioedema or both due to activation and degranulation of skin mast cells and the release of histamine and other mediators. Most cases of urticaria are acute urticaria, which lasts ≤6 weeks and can be associated with infections or intake of drugs or foods. Chronic urticaria (CU) is either spontaneous or inducible, lasts >6 weeks and persists for >1 year in most patients. CU greatly affects patient quality of life, and is linked to psychiatric comorbidities and high healthcare costs. In contrast to chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) has definite and subtype-specific triggers that induce signs and symptoms. The pathogenesis of CSU consists of several interlinked events involving autoantibodies, complement and coagulation. The diagnosis of urticaria is clinical, but several tests can be performed to exclude differential diagnoses and identify underlying causes in CSU or triggers in CIndU. Current urticaria treatment aims at complete response, with a stepwise approach using second-generation H1 antihistamines, omalizumab and cyclosporine. Novel treatment approaches centre on targeting mediators, signalling pathways and receptors of mast cells and other immune cells. Further research should focus on defining disease endotypes and their biomarkers, identifying new treatment targets and developing improved therapies.

Chronic Urticaria: A Swedish Registry-based Cohort Study on Population, Comorbidities and Treatment Characteristics

Swedish databases present unique opportunities to research population data on diseases and treatments. The current study is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive registry-based study on a chronic urticaria population in Sweden to date. The aim of this study was to describe the chronic urticaria population in Stockholm County regarding epidemiology, demographics, comorbidity, healthcare usage and treatment patterns in relation to current international guidelines. Real-world data were extracted between 2013 and 2019, yielding 10,642 adult patients. Study period prevalence of chronic urticaria was 0.53%, the mean annual incidence was approximately 0.08%, and 68% of patients were female. Regarding diagnosis, 58% were first diagnosed in primary care, approximately 50% were diagnosed before the age of 40 years. Regarding type of urticaria, 89% had chronic spontaneous urticaria, 11% had chronic inducible urticaria, and 5% of patients with chronic urticaria had coexisting angioedema. Common coexisting diagnoses were, for example, asthma, allergy, psychiatric and behavioural disorders and cardiometabolic disorders. Treatment patterns generally followed guidelines, yet data indicated that guidelines were not fully implemented, especially in primary care.

Epidemiology, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization of patients with chronic urticaria in Germany

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive data on the epidemiology and comorbidities of chronic urticaria (CU) in Germany are either limited, or not contemporary.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the epidemiology of CU, overall comorbidities and healthcare resource utilized by patients with CU in Germany, using an anonymized statutory health insurance (SHI) database.

METHODS

Anonymized SHI claims research database of the Institute for Applied Health Research, Berlin [InGef] (01 January 2015-30 September 2018) was used to analyse insured individuals with a confirmed diagnosis of CU (ICD-10-GM codes). Twelve-month diagnosed prevalence and incidence, comorbidities (vs. atopic dermatitis and psoriasis), and healthcare utilization by patients with CU were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 4 693 772 individuals of all ages listed in the database, 3 538 540 were observable during 2017. Overall, 17 524 patients (˜0.5%) were diagnosed with CU; chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU: 71.2%), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU: 19.7%), CSU+CIndU (9.1%). Females, vs. males, had higher diagnosed prevalence (0.62% vs. 0.37%) and diagnosed incidence (0.18% vs. 0.11%) of CU among all patients. Patients most frequently visited general practitioners (41.3% of total visits). Hypertensive diseases (43.5%), lipoprotein metabolism disorders (32.1%) and affective disorders (26.0%) were the most frequently reported comorbidities of special interest. Rates of most comorbidities of special interests were similar to atopic dermatitis and psoriasis patients, and all higher vs. overall population. More than half (54.1%) of all CU patients were not prescribed any treatment. Second-generation H₁ -antihistamines were the most commonly prescribed medication for adult (17.9%) and paediatric (27.9%) patients. Patients with CIndU (paediatric, 15.5%; adult, 7.8%) were more often hospitalized versus patients with CSU (paediatric, 9.9%; adult, 4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In Germany, prevalence of CU along with multiple comorbidities may pose increased burden on the healthcare system. Awareness of adhering to treatment guidelines, and aiming for complete control of urticaria, needs to be driven and may improve outcomes.

Do Pediatric Emergency Physicians Comply With Guideline Recommendations in Management of Patients With Acute Urticaria?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the level of knowledge and practical preferences of pediatricians regarding acute urticaria (AU) management and to assess the effects of training provided in accordance with the current urticaria guideline recommendations on pediatricians who work in the pediatric emergency department (PED).

METHODS

A theoretical training was provided to pediatricians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of AU in line with current urticaria guideline recommendations. Before the training, pediatricians completed a 10-item questionnaire. This prospective study assesses their treatment approaches in patients admitted to PED because of AU during the 6-month period before and the 1-year period after training.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventeen children in the pretraining and 1085 children in the posttraining periods were treated for AU in PED. Forty-eight pediatricians participated in the training. According to their questionnaire responses, 35% of them used only H1 antihistamine (AH) treatment, 50% used second-generation H1 AH (2nd-GAH) as AHs, 75% preferred the oral route of administration, and 85.4% did not administer systemic corticosteroid (sCS) to all patients. Comparing the practice approaches of the pediatricians in the pretraining and posttraining periods, first-generation H1 antihistamine (1st-GAH) preference rate decreased from 68.4% to 30.3% and the sCS preference rate decreased from 58.5% to 25.7%, while the 2nd-GAH preference rate increased from 31.7% to 69.7% (P < 0.001 for all). No treatments were prescribed for 10.8% of patients before the training and 3% after the training during discharge at home (P < 0.05). Comparing the home treatment choices of the pediatricians in the pretraining and posttraining periods, 1st-GAH preference rate decreased from 11.5% to 5%, while the 2nd-GAH preference rate increased from 78.7% to 91.5% (for both parameters, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Practical treatment preferences of pediatricians in the treatment of children with AU differ considerably from both current guideline recommendations and their own theoretical knowledge, and training can enhance pediatricians' compliance with current guideline recommendations.

The challenges of chronic urticaria part 2: Pharmacological treatment, chronic inducible urticaria, urticaria in special situations

This is Part 2 of an updated follow-up review of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) position paper on the diagnosis and treatment of urticaria and angioedema. Since that document was published, new advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic urticaria, and greater experience with the use of biologics in patients with severe refractory disease, mainly omalizumab, have been gained. For these reasons, WAO decided to initiate an update targeted to general practitioners around the world, incorporating the most recent information on epidemiology, immunopathogenesis, comorbidities, quality of life, clinical case presentations, and the management of chronic spontaneous and chronic inducible urticaria, and urticaria in special situations such as childhood and pregnancy. A special task force of WAO experts was invited to write the different sections of the manuscript, and the final document was approved by the WAO Board of Directors. This paper is not intended to be a substitute for current national and international guidelines on the management of urticaria and angioedema, but to provide an updated simplified guidance for physicians around the world who have to manage patients with this common ailment.

The Diagnostic Workup in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria-What to Test and Why

BACKGROUND

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), the guidelines recommend very limited diagnostic procedures during the routine workup, although additional investigations might be indicated in some patients with CSU. For physicians treating patients with CSU, it is often difficult to decide which diagnostic tests are useful.

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations on what diagnostic tests should be performed on which patients with CSU.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search on the respective topics and identified relevant questions that should prompt diagnostic procedures based on the published evidence and expert consensus among all authors.

RESULTS

We provide questions, diagnostic testing, where appropriate, and recommendation that should be included when assessing the history of a patient with CSU, to explore and rule out differential diagnoses, to assess patients for underlying causes and modifying conditions, to explore patients for comorbid diseases and consequences of having CSU, and to assess patients for CSU components that can help to predict their disease course and response to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we provide physicians treating patients with CSU with information about which clues should lead to which tests and why.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for chronic spontaneous Urticaria: a focus on non-biological therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria (wheals) or angioedema, which occur for a period of six weeks or longer without an apparent cause. The condition may impair the patient's quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment for CSU is mainly symptomatic. Both AAAAI/ACAAI practice parameters and EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines suggest CSU management in a stepwise manner. First-line therapy is with second-generation H₁-antihistamines. Treatment should be stepped up along the algorithm if symptoms are not adequately controlled. Increasing the dosage of second-generation H₁-antihistamines, with the addition of first-generation H₁-antihistamines, H₂ antagonist, omalizumab, ciclosporin A, or short-term corticosteroid may be necessary. New medications are being developed to treat refractory CSU. They include spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, prostaglandin D₂ receptor inhibitor, H₄-antihistamine, and other agents. The authors discuss these treatments and provide expert perspectives on the management of CSU.

EXPERT OPINION

Second-generation H₁-antihistamines remain the first-line therapeutic options for the management of CSU. For patients not responding to higher-dose H₁-antihistamines, international guidelines recommend the addition of omalizumab. Efficacy and safety data for newer agents are still pending. Large-scale, well-designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials will further provide evidence on the safety profile and efficacy of these agents in patients with CSU.

Clinical characteristics of patients with chronic urticaria and adherence to management guidelines by postgraduate students in dermatology: A retrospective single center study

Background:

Chronic urticaria is a heterogenous skin disorder representing one of the important reasons for consultation with a dermatologist. Dermatology post-graduate students play an importanrt role in the treatment of patients with chronic urticaria.

Objective:

The objective of the study was to describe clinical characteristics of patients with chronic urticaria and assess adherence to the guidelines by postgraduate students in the department of dermatology of a tertiary care center.

Materials and Methods:

In this retrospective study, prescriptions of patients with chronic urticaria and/or angioedema presenting to the outpatient department for 5 months were analyzed. Percentage of prescriptions adhering to international urticaria management guidelines was calculated. Urticaria Activity Score, percentage of patients receiving second-generation antihistamines, first-generation antihistamines, and other drugs was recorded. Comorbidities in patients with chronic urticaria were also noted.

Results:

A total of 60 patients (mean age 32.1 years; 58.3% male) were included in. Mean (SD) duration of urticaria at the time of study was 4.7 (2.7) months. Demographism and history of allergy to drugs was present in 45 (75%) and 4 (6.7%) patients. Mean (SD) Urticaria Activity Score was 12.5 (6.5). A total of 12 (20%) patients had comorbidities. Mean number of drugs received per patient was 1.7 (0.5). A total of 47 (78.3%) patients received second-generation antihistamines, whereas 11 (18.3%) received first-generation antihistamines. Two (3.3%) patients received combination of first-generation and second-generation antihistamines. Fexofenadine, levocetirizine, bilastine, and cetirizine was prescribed to 24 (40%), 26 (43.3%), 18 (30%), and 14 (23.3%) patients. There was no significant difference in male and female patients receiving fexofenadine (P = 0.59) or levocetirizine (P = 0.13).

Conclusion:

Adherence to urticaria management guidelines by resident doctors in dermatology department in our institute was satisfactory.

Real-Life Experience of Efficacy and Safety of Bilastine in the Refractory Cases of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and its Effect on the Quality of Life of Patients

Introduction:

Second-generation H1-antihistamines (SGAHs) are the mainstay of treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Bilastine, newer non-sedating SGAHs, was recently introduced in India after the approval of the Drugs Controller General of India. There is a paucity of evidence about the long-term efficacy and safety of Bilastine in Indian patients. We undertook this study to find the long-term efficacy and tolerability of Bilastine in patients with CSU in India.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective chart analysis was conducted by analyzing electronic medical records from May 1, 2019, to March 20, 2020, to identify patients of CSU who were prescribed Bilastine. Adult patients, with CSU >6 months were included, who had an unsatisfactory response as per Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) to previous antihistamine therapies, and who continued treatment for at least 6 months were included. Treatment effectiveness was determined by retrospectively reviewing their UAS7 scores from their medical records and evaluating their scores at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Also, DLQI was assessed and compared at baseline and week 24.

Result:

Forty-nine patients were found to fulfill the criteria and included in the study. At the end of 24 weeks, 51% of patients (n = 25) achieved complete treatment response (UAS = 0), whereas 49% of patients (n = 24) were labeled as well-controlled urticaria (UAS<6). At 24 weeks, the mean UAS7 score (1.35 ± 1.61) was statistically significant compared to the baseline score (20.2 ± 5.73). The mean score of DLQI was also reduced to 1.63 ± 1.18 at 24 weeks from 8.39 ± 2.49 at baseline (P-value <0.001).

Conclusion:

The study showed that in patients who had an inadequate response with commonly used antihistamines at a double dose or combined use, switching over to Bilastine resulted not only in relieving the symptoms of CSU but also improved the quality of life of the patients with CSU.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria in clinical practice: a pilot survey about attitudes and perceptions on assessment, diagnostic work-up and dietary management

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a heterogeneous condition whose management can be complex and challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate physicians' attitudes regarding practical aspects of CSU management, including adherence to international guidelines, criteria and instruments for CSU assessment, prescription of laboratory investigations and role of dietary measures.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a study-specific questionnaire. It was administered to a group of physicians with a specialist interest in CSU from different areas of Italy definable as "CSU experts" (group A; N.=21) and subsequently to other physicians who managed CSU only occasionally in their clinical activity (group B; N.=25).

RESULTS

The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines were considered very or moderately useful by the majority of participants. Significantly more physicians in group A reported that such guidelines were always followed in clinical practice (P=0.0008). Instruments for the assessment of CSU severity/activity and quality of life were used in clinical practice significantly more often by CSU experts as compared to group B. Dietary measures were frequently suggested for CSU patients by nearly three quarters of group B members and by only 5% of CSU experts (P<0.00001). When physicians were asked to indicate the type of laboratory examinations that were commonly performed in patients with longstanding and/or uncontrolled CSU, regardless of history, the investigations most frequently reported were full blood count and thyroid autoantibodies, followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate and/or C-reactive protein and thyroid function tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present pilot survey seem to suggest the heterogeneity of the approaches used for CSU management in clinical practice.

Therapeutic management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in clinical practice: results from a pilot survey

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic approaches to patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) differ among health care professionals and may be influenced by many factors. This cross-sectional survey was aimed at evaluating physicians' attitudes regarding therapeutic management of CSU in clinical practice.

METHODS

A study-specific questionnaire was administered to a group of physicians (N.=21) with a specialist interest in CSU from different areas of Italy (group A) and also to other physicians (N.=25) who manage CSU only occasionally in their clinical activity (group B).

RESULTS

In case of ineffectiveness of second-generation antihistamines at standard doses, higher doses of the same drug were always or frequently prescribed by most physicians in both groups, and 64% in group B and one third in group A usually increased the dose up to twice. Old-generation antihistamines were never used in clinical practice by 14% of survey participants in group A and 24% in group B, with the remaining physicians reporting rare or occasional uses. The prescription of systemic corticosteroids appeared to be more common among physicians in group B. The question concerning the use of alternative drugs in refractory CSU produced different answers between the two groups. Costs and access to specialist reference centers were indicated as the most important barriers to the use of medications different from antihistamines.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that therapeutic approaches to CSU seem to be heterogeneous in clinical practice and could be at least in part conditioned by the different medical settings where physicians usually work.

Combination therapy with omalizumab and an immune-suppressive agent for resistant chronic spontaneous rrticaria - A real-life experience

Background

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a relatively common immune mediated disease that can be effectively treated nowadays. Nevertheless, for some patients remission cannot be achieved following current treatment recommendations, defined as resistant CSU (r-CSU). Treating r-CSU is challenging, and, currently, there are no recommended interventions. In this real-life study we describe successful therapy of 18 r-CSU patients using an "intensified protocol" of anti-IgE-antibody (omalizumab) concomitantly with an immunosuppressant. We defined the r-CSU phenotype and compared it to omalizumab-responsive CSU (Or-CSU) phenotype.

Methods

Clinical and serological data of 72 CSU patients (ie, 18 r-CSU and 54 age and sex matched Or-CSU) were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients were diagnosed with CSU for ≥6 months and treated at the Sheba Medical Center during 2013–2018.

Results

Of 289 CSU patients, 18 (6%) were diagnosed with r-CSU and treated with the "intensified protocol" including omalizumab and cyclosporine-A (16p), methotrexate (1p), and azathioprine (1p). Of which, 14/18 (78%) achieved complete remission, 2/18 (11%) partial remission, and 2/18 (11%) no remission. During follow-up no serious adverse events were documented. r-CSU patients received higher doses of antihistamine (p < 0.0001) and omalizumab (425 ± 58 mg/month vs. 283 ± 86 mg/month; p < 0.0001) compared to Or-CSU. The r-CSU phenotype was linked with concomitant autoimmunity (p = 0.0005) and a lower level of IgE prior to initiation of therapy (p = 0.027).

Conclusion

r-CSU may be a distinct CSU phenotype characterized by severe disease, concomitant autoimmunity, and lower baseline-IgE levels (low "autoallergy"). An "intensified protocol" with omalizumab and an immunosuppressive agent was found to be efficacious and safe for r-CSU. Further larger studies are required to verify these results.

Learnings from real-life experience of using omalizumab for chronic urticaria in Latin America

Background

Updated urticaria guidelines recommend that patients should be assessed for disease activity, severity, control, and quality of life at baseline and follow up. Regarding treatment, guidelines consider second generation antihistamines as the cornerstone in therapy for chronic urticaria (CU), while other drugs, such as omalizumab, are conceived as second-line alternatives. In regards to omalizumab, despite advances in the management of CU, there are still open questions about timing, dosing, and objective measures for clinical response. This study was designed to portray the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in chronic urticaria management, as well as the effectiveness and treatment patterns of omalizumab in CU, as seen in a real-life setting in Latin America.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study, involving 72 Latin American patients with chronic urticaria treated with omalizumab. Patient reported outcomes and treatment patterns, response, quality of life improvement and discontinuation were analyzed.

Results

From the 72 patients, 91.7% (n = 66) were assessed through PROs, where urticaria control test (UCT) was the most used (79.2%; n = 57). Overall, 80.0% (n = 44) responded to omalizumab at some point of the treatment. Omalizumab 300 mg was associated with earlier response compared to lower doses. Regardless of dosage, most patients assessed with CU-Q2oL improved quality of life (80.8%; n = 21). With respect to omalizumab discontinuation, 20.8% (n = 15) patients interrupted omalizumab before the 3rd month of treatment (p = .000).

Conclusions

The present study highlights how the use of PROs and omalizumab in Latin America differ from guidelines' recommendations and clinical trials. Even though most patients were initiated under omalizumab 300 mg, most of them finished with lower doses. Regardless of dosage, most patients responded to omalizumab and improved quality of life at some point during treatment. However, such features were seen earlier with omalizumab 300 mg. Regarding treatment discontinuation, one-fifth of patients interrupted omalizumab before the third month.