Distinct tissue injury patterns in juvenile dermatomyositis auto-antibody subgroups

Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) expression in myositides: Sarcoplasmic expression is common in both dermatomyositis and lupus myositis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) is a type I interferon (IFN1) pathway activation marker and MxA sarcoplasmic expression is currently recognized as a highly specific marker for dermatomyositis (DM). However, we have frequently observed endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions (TRI), another surrogate IFN1 activation marker, in a variety of overlap myositides. The aim of this study was to examine MxA expression in those myositides.

METHODS

We retrospectively performed MxA immunostaining on a wide range of myositides.

RESULTS

MxA sarcoplasmic expression was present in DM (94.4%, 17/18), active lupus myositis (LM, 80%,16/20), inactive LM (36%, 4/11), antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS, 20%, 2/10), systemic sclerosis (13%, 2/15), Sjogren's syndrome (7.7%, 1/13), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) myositis (5.6%, 1/18) and was absent in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM, 0/16) and hydroxychloroquine myopathy (0/5). The sensitivity and specificity of MxA sarcoplasmic expression for LM and DM combined compared with all other myositides were 84.6% (95% CI: 69.5-94.1) and 92.1 (95% CI: 83.6-97.0), respectively, and superior to TRIs. MxA capillary expression was nonspecific. Histologically, 35% of LM cases demonstrated a unique panfascicular necrotizing myopathy pattern. The remainder of the LM cases had significant morphological overlap with DM/ASyS (20%), IMNM (20%), or polymyositis (15%).

DISCUSSION

MxA sarcoplasmic expression is highly prevalent in LM and DM and is a useful marker in differentiating DM and LM from other myositides. LM can manifest in various pathology patterns that need to be differentiated from DM, IMNM, ASyS, and polymyositis.

Complement and MHC patterns can provide the diagnostic framework for inflammatory neuromuscular diseases

Histopathological analysis stands as the gold standard for the identification and differentiation of inflammatory neuromuscular diseases. These disorders continue to constitute a diagnostic challenge due to their clinical heterogeneity, rarity and overlapping features. To establish standardized protocols for the diagnosis of inflammatory neuromuscular diseases, the development of cost-effective and widely applicable tools is crucial, especially in settings constrained by limited resources. The focus of this review is to emphasize the diagnostic value of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and complement patterns in the immunohistochemical analysis of these diseases. We explore the immunological background of MHC and complement signatures that characterize inflammatory features, with a specific focus on idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. With this approach, we aim to provide a diagnostic algorithm that may improve and simplify the diagnostic workup based on a limited panel of stainings. Our approach acknowledges the current limitations in the field of inflammatory neuromuscular diseases, particularly the scarcity of large-scale, prospective studies that validate the diagnostic potential of these markers. Further efforts are needed to establish a consensus on the diagnostic protocol to effectively distinguish these diseases.

Contribution of Complement, Microangiopathy and Inflammation in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group characterized by muscle weakness and skin symptoms and are categorized into six subtypes: dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), immune-mediated myopathy (IMNM), inclusion body myopathy (IBM), and overlap myositis. Myositis-specific autoantibodies were detected for the diagnosis and classification of IIM. This review highlights the pathogenic contributions of the complement system, microangiopathy, and inflammation in IIM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Deposition of complement around capillaries and/or the sarcolemma was observed in muscle biopsy specimens from patients with DM, ASS, and IMNM, suggesting the pathomechanism of complement-dependent muscle and endothelial cell injury. A recent study using human muscle microvascular endothelial cells showed that Jo-1 antibodies from ASS induce complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro. Based on both clinical and pathological observations, antibody- and complement-mediated microangiopathy may contribute to the development of DM and anti-Jo-1 ASS. Juvenile DM is characterized by the loss of capillaries, perivascular inflammation, and small-vessel angiopathies, which may be related to microinfarction and perifascicular atrophy. Several serum biomarkers that reflect the IFN1 signature and microangiopathy are elevated in patients with DM. The pathological observation of myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA), which suggests a type 1 interferon (IFN1) signature in DM, supports the diagnosis and further understanding of the pathomechanism of IIM. A recent report showed that an increase in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM-1) around perimysial blood vessels and muscles in patients with IIM plays a role in triggering inflammation and promoting the migration of inflammatory cells by secreting proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α.

SUMMARY

The deposition of complement in muscles and capillaries is a characteristic feature of DM, ASS, and IMNM. Microangiopathy plays a pathogenic role in DM, possibly resulting in perifascicular atrophy. Further understanding of the detailed pathomechanism regarding complement, microangiopathy, and inflammation may lead to novel therapeutic approaches for IIM.

Muscle pathology of antisynthetase syndrome according to antibody subtypes

Identification of antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) could be challenging due to inaccessibility and technical difficulty of the serology test for the less common non-Jo-1 antibodies. This study aimed to describe ASS antibody-specific myopathology and evaluate the diagnostic utility of myofiber HLA-DR expression. We reviewed 212 ASS muscle biopsies and compared myopathologic features among subtypes. Additionally, we compared their HLA-DR staining pattern with 602 non-ASS myositis and 140 genetically confirmed myopathies known to have an inflammatory component. We used t-test and Fisher's exact for comparisons and used sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values to assess the utility of HLA-DR expression for ASS diagnosis. RNAseq performed from a subset of myositis cases and histologically normal muscle biopsies was used to evaluate interferon (IFN)-signaling pathway-related genes. Anti-OJ ASS showed prominent myopathology with higher scores in muscle fiber (4.6 ± 2.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.8, p = 0.001) and inflammatory domains (6.8 ± 3.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.9, p  = 0.006) than non-OJ ASS. HLA-DR expression and IFN-γ-related genes upregulation were prominent in ASS and inclusion body myositis (IBM). When dermatomyositis and IBM were excluded, HLA-DR expression was 95.4% specific and 61.2% sensitive for ASS with a positive predictive value of 85.9% and a negative predictive value of 84.2%; perifascicular HLA-DR pattern is common in anti-Jo-1 ASS than non-Jo-1 ASS (63.1% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.0001). In the appropriate clinicopathological context, myofiber HLA-DR expression help support ASS diagnosis. The presence of HLA-DR expression suggests involvement of IFN-γ in the pathogenesis of ASS, though the detailed mechanisms have yet to be elucidated.

Histological Methods to Assess Skeletal Muscle Degeneration and Regeneration in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive disease caused by the loss of function of the protein dystrophin. This protein contributes to the stabilisation of striated cells during contraction, as it anchors the cytoskeleton with components of the extracellular matrix through the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DAPC). Moreover, absence of the functional protein affects the expression and function of proteins within the DAPC, leading to molecular events responsible for myofibre damage, muscle weakening, disability and, eventually, premature death. Presently, there is no cure for DMD, but different treatments help manage some of the symptoms. Advances in genetic and exon-skipping therapies are the most promising intervention, the safety and efficiency of which are tested in animal models. In addition to in vivo functional tests, ex vivo molecular evaluation aids assess to what extent the therapy has contributed to the regenerative process. In this regard, the later advances in microscopy and image acquisition systems and the current expansion of antibodies for immunohistological evaluation together with the development of different spectrum fluorescent dyes have made histology a crucial tool. Nevertheless, the complexity of the molecular events that take place in dystrophic muscles, together with the rise of a multitude of markers for each of the phases of the process, makes the histological assessment a challenging task. Therefore, here, we summarise and explain the rationale behind different histological techniques used in the literature to assess degeneration and regeneration in the field of dystrophinopathies, focusing especially on those related to DMD.

Update on dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes and comments on current knowledge in dermatomyositis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre classification of dermatomyositis has been challenging by the discovery of clinicopathological features associated with dermatomyositis-specific antibody (DMSA) that were not incorporated in the original criteria. These features include but may not be limited to the presence of perifascicular necrosis in anti-Mi-2 dermatomyositis; presence of diffuse nonperifascicular sarcoplasmic myxovirus resistance protein A expression in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis; and dermatomyositis sine dermatitis in anti-NXP-2 dermatomyositis. Variations and subclassifications within the same DMSA subtypes are observed: anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis is clinically subcategorized into good, intermediate, and poor prognostic subgroups; concurrent anti-CCAR1 and anti-TIF1-γ positivity identify anti-TIF1-γ-positive patient with a lower risk for cancer-associated myositis. Owing to distinct IFN1-signaling pathway activation in dermatomyositis, JAK-STAT inhibitor - the pathway-targeted therapy, have been studied with promising results in refractory dermatomyositis and some new-onset dermatomyositis. In addition, the potential serum biomarkers for IFN1 pathway activation are being investigated for their performance in monitoring the disease activity and the efficacy of the treatment.

SUMMARY

DMSA, evidence of prominent IFN1 pathway activation, and risk/severity-associated biomarkers would likely play major roles in future dermatomyositis classification, disease monitoring, and treatment decision.

Muscle biopsy in myositis: What the rheumatologist needs to know

The appropriate analysis of skeletal muscle tissues is a key element in many diagnostic procedures and can deliver valuable information about the organ that is affected. Although arguably the frequency of muscle biopsy may be declining in certain domains where genetic analysis is now the first line of diagnostic evaluation, it still has an important role in assessment of patients with neuromuscular disorders such as congenital myopathies, muscular dystrophies, metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Here, we have comprehensively discussed the aspects of a modern and fruitful approach to muscle biopsy histopathological studies in rheumatological disorders. We have focussed on the neuromuscular involvement in myositis and its differential diagnoses in both adult and paediatric settings. We have also covered the clinical indications for the biopsy, technical aspects and practical points relevant for the rheumatologists. Finally, we have critically discussed the current and future opportunities that a muscle biopsy may offer and its limitations.

Morphological Characteristics of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies in Juvenile Patients

Background: In juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), morphological characteristic features of distinct subgroups are not well defined. New treatment strategies require a precise diagnosis of the subgroups in IIM, and, therefore, knowledge about the pathomorphology of juvenile IIMs is warranted. Methods: Muscle biopsies from 15 patients (median age 8 (range 3–17) years, 73% female) with IIM and seven controls were analyzed by standard methods, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Detailed clinical and laboratory data were accessed retrospectively. Results: Proximal muscle weakness and skin symptoms were the main clinical symptoms. Dermatomyositis (DM) was diagnosed in 9/15, antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) in 4/15, and overlap myositis (OM) in 2/15. Analysis of skeletal muscle tissues showed inflammatory cells and diffuse upregulation of MHC class I in all subtypes. Morphological key findings were COX-deficient fibers as a striking pathology in DM and perimysial alkaline phosphatase positivity in anti-Jo-1-ASyS. Vascular staining of the type 1 IFN-surrogate marker, MxA, correlated with endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions in both groups. None of these specific morphological findings were present in anti-PL7-ASyS or OM patients. Conclusions: Morphological characteristics discriminate IIM subtypes in juvenile patients, emphasizing differences in aetiopathogenesis and supporting the notion of individual and targeted therapeutic strategies.

Dermatomyositis: Muscle Pathology According to Antibody Subtypes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Discoveries of dermatomyositis specific antibodies (DMSAs) in dermatomyositis patients raised awareness of various myopathological features among antibody subtypes. However, only perifascicular atrophy and perifascicular myxovirus resistant protein A (MxA) overexpression were officially included as the definitive pathological criteria for dermatomyositis classification. We aimed to demonstrate myopathological features in MxA-positive dermatomyositis to determine characteristic myopathological features in different DMSA subtypes.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective pathology review of muscle biopsies of dermatomyositis patients diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2020 in a tertiary laboratory for muscle diseases. We included all muscle biopsies with sarcoplasmic expression for MxA and seropositivity for DMSAs. MxA-positive muscle biopsies which tested negative for all DMSAs were included as seronegative dermatomyositis. We evaluated histological features stratified according to four pathology domains (muscle fiber, inflammatory, vascular, and connective tissue) and histological features of interest by histochemistry, enzyme histochemistry, and immunohistochemical study commonly used in the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy. We performed ultrastructural studies of 54 available specimens.

RESULT

A total of 256 patients were included. Of these, 249 patients were positive for one of the five DMSAs (seropositive patients: 87 anti-TIF1-γ; 40 anti-Mi-2; 29 anti-MDA5; 83 anti-NXP-2; and 10 anti-SAE DM) and 7 patients were negative for all five DMSAs (seronegative patients). Characteristic myopathological features in each DMSA subtype were as follows: anti-TIF1-γ with vacuolated/punched out fibers (64.7%, P<.001) and perifascicular enhancement in HLA-ABC stain (75.9%, P<.001); anti-Mi-2 with prominent muscle fiber damage (score 4.8±2.1, P<.001), inflammatory cell infiltration (score 8.0±3.0, P=.002), perifascicular atrophy (67.5%, P=.02), perifascicular necrosis (52.5%, P<.001), increased perimysial alkaline phosphatase activity (70.0%, P<.001), central necrotic peripheral regenerating fibers (45.0%, P<.001), and sarcolemmal membrane attack complex deposition (67.5%, P<.001); anti-MDA5 with scattered/diffuse staining pattern of MxA (65.5%, P<.001) with less muscle pathology and inflammatory features; anti-NXP2 with microinfarction (26.5%, P<.001); and anti-SAE and seronegative DM with HLA-DR expression (50.0%, P=.02 and 57.1%, P=.02, respectively).

DISCUSSION

We described a comprehensive serological-pathological correlation of DM primarily using MxA expression as an inclusion criterion. In our study, DMSAs were associated with distinctive myopathological features suggesting different underlying pathobiological mechanisms in each subtype.

Recent research on myositis-specific autoantibodies in juvenile dermatomyositis

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is an autoimmune disease manifesting as proximal muscle weakness and skin rash and can involve multiple systems and visceral organs. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) are highly associated with various complications and prognosis in JDM. Patients with anti-Mi-2 antibodies tend to have good prognosis and typical clinical symptoms. Patients with anti-MDA5 antibodies often have diffuse interstitial lung disease and skin ulcer, with mild symptoms of myositis. Patients with anti-NXP2 antibodies often have calcinosis, and such antibodies are associated with gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. Patients with anti-TIF1-γ antibodies have diffuse and refractory skin lesions. Anti-SAE antibodies are rarely detected in children, with few reports of such cases. This article reviews the features of clinical phenotypes in JDM children with these five types of MSAs, so as to provide a basis for the clinical treatment and follow-up management of children with JDM.

Pathology Features of Immune and Inflammatory Myopathies, Including a Polymyositis Pattern, Relate Strongly to Serum Autoantibodies

We asked whether myopathology features of immune or inflammatory myopathies (IIM), without reference to clinical or laboratory attributes, correlate with serum autoantibodies. Retrospective study included 148 muscle biopsies with: B-cell inflammatory foci (BIM), myovasculopathy, perimysial pathology (IMPP), myofiber necrosis without perimysial or vessel damage or inflammation (MNec), inflammation and myofiber vacuoles or mitochondrial pathology (IM-VAMP), granulomas, chronic graft-versus-host disease, or none of these criteria. 18 IIM-related serum autoantibodies were tested. Strong associations between myopathology and autoantibodies included: BIM with PM/Scl-100 (63%; odds ratio [OR] = 72); myovasculopathies with TIF1-γ or NXP2 (70%; OR = 72); IMPP with Jo-1 (33%; OR = 28); MNec with SRP54 (23%; OR = 37); IM-VAMP with NT5C1a (95%; OR = 83). Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) antibodies related to presence of myofiber necrosis across all groups (82%; OR = 9), but not to one IIM pathology group. Our results validate characterizations of IIM by myopathology features, showing strong associations with some serum autoantibodies, another objective IIM-related marker. BIM with PM/Scl-100 antibodies can be described pathologically as polymyositis. Tif1-γ and NXP2 antibodies are both common in myovasculopathies. HMGCR antibodies associate with myofiber necrosis, but not one IIM pathology subtype. Relative association strengths of IIM-related autoantibodies to IIM myopathology features versus clinical characteristics require further study.

Multiple neurological manifestations in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and anti-NXP2-positive myositis: A case report

RATIONALE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune inflammatory disease that frequently affects various organs. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in SLE patients, known as neuropsychiatric SLE, are clinically common. However, the principal manifestation of cranial neuropathy in patients with SLE and comorbidities is relatively rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this report, we describe a 51-year-old Chinese woman who was admitted with a chief complaint of chronic-onset facial paresthesia, dysphagia, and choking cough when drinking water, accompanied by slurred speech, salivation, and limb weakness. The blood autoantibody test results showed that many SLE-associated antibodies were positive. Meanwhile, anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP2) antibody was strongly positive in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) spectrum test from the serum. Muscle biopsy indicated inflammatory infiltration of the muscle fiber stroma.

DIAGNOSES

Taking into account the clinical manifestations and laboratory tests of the present case, the diagnosis of SLE and probable IIM was established.

INTERVENTIONS

Corticosteroids and additional gamma globulin were administered and the clinical symptoms were relieved during the treatment process.

OUTCOMES

Unfortunately, the patient experienced sudden cardiac and respiratory arrest. Multiple system dysfunctions exacerbated disease progression, but in the present case, we speculated that myocardial damage resulting from SLE could explain why she suddenly died.

LESSONS

To our knowledge, multiple neurological manifestations in patients with SLE and anti-NXP2-positive myositis are rare. Note that SLE is still a life-threatening disease that causes multiple system dysfunctions, which requires increasing attention.

Mitochondrial morphology and MAVS-IFN1 signaling pathway in muscles of anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis

Objective

This study aimed to investigate mitochondrial changes and the mitochondrial antiviral‐signaling protein (MAVS)‐type I interferon (IFN1) signaling pathway in the muscles of anti‐melanoma differentiation gene 5(MDA5) dermatomyositis (DM) patients.

Methods

Eleven anti‐MDA5 DM and ten antibody‐negative DM patients were included. Muscle biopsies were performed in all patients. Muscle pathology and mitochondrial morphology in particular were compared between two groups. The expression of MDA5, MAVS, interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 7, and IFN‐stimulated gene 15, which are components of the MAVS‐IFN1 signaling pathway, was measured in muscle specimen. The correlation between MAVS expression in muscles and disease phenotypes and muscle pathology were analyzed.

Results

Anti‐MDA5 DM showed a significantly lower incidence of the characteristic DM pathology (P < 0.05) than antibody‐negative DM, including perifascicular fiber atrophy, inflammation, and vasculopathy. Mitochondrial abnormalities in anti‐MDA5 patients revealed a high incidence of (8/11,72.7%) and different pattern from that in antibody‐negative DM. MDA5, MAVS, IFN regulatory factor 7, and IFN stimulated gene 15 expression levels in the muscles of anti‐MDA5 DM patients were higher than those of the controls (P < 0.05) but lower than those of antibody‐negative DM patients (P < 0.05). The MAVS levels negatively correlated with manual muscle test 8 scores (r = 0.701, P = 0.016).

Conclusions

Compared to antibody‐negative DM, we presented a different distribution of the mitochondrial pathology and less severe morphology in anti‐MDA5 DM. We also revealed the enhanced but less intensive MAVS‐IFN1 signaling pathway activity in muscles of anti‐MDA5 DM. Such disparity suggested the potentially different mechanism of muscle injury in two DM groups.