1
|
Kulakova E, Graumann L, Wingenfeld K. The Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis and Social Cognition in Borderline Personality Disorder. Curr Neuropharmacol 2024; 22:378-394. [PMID: 37539934 PMCID: PMC10845078 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666230804085639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by emotional instability, impulsivity and unstable interpersonal relationships. Patients experience discomforting levels of distress, inducing symptoms like dissociation, aggression or withdrawal. Social situations are particularly challenging, and acute social stress can reduce patients' cognitive and social functioning. In patients with Major Depressive Disorder or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, which show high comorbidity with BPD, the endocrine stress response is characterized by Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction, which affects cognitive functioning. Compared to these clinical groups, research on HPA-axis function in BPD is relatively scarce, but evidence points towards a blunted cortisol reactivity to acute stress. Since BPD patients are particularly prone to social stress and experience high subjective difficulties in these situations, it seems plausible that HPA-axis dysregulation might contribute to decreased social cognition in BPD. The present review summarizes findings on the HPA-axis function in BPD and its association with social cognition following acute social stress. For this purpose, we review literature that employed a widely used social stressor (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST) to study the effects of acute social stress on social cognition and the HPA-axis response. We contrast these findings with studies on social cognition that employed Cyberball, another widely used social stressor that lacks HPA-axis involvement. We conclude that research on social cognition in BPD reveals heterogeneous results with no clear relationship between social functioning and HPA-axis response. More research is needed to better understand the psychophysiological underpinnings of impaired social cognition in BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Kulakova
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Livia Graumann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Wingenfeld
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Preti E, Richetin J, Poggi A, Fertuck E. A Model of Trust Processes in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2023; 25:555-567. [PMID: 37889465 PMCID: PMC10654201 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-023-01468-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Unstable relationships are a core feature of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Impairments in trust processes (i.e., appraisal and learning regarding others' trustworthiness) can subserve interpersonal problems associated with BPD, but the determinants, mechanisms, consequences, and variations in trust impairments among individuals with BPD remain poorly characterized. Thus, a better understanding of such impairments could help target interventions that address the interpersonal problems of individuals with BPD beyond emotion dysregulation, impulsivity, and aggression. RECENT FINDINGS We conducted a pre-registered systematic review of empirical studies on trust processes and BPD features (k = 29). Results are organized around a heuristic model of trust processes in BPD comprising the following stages: developmental factors, prior beliefs and dispositions, situation perception, emotional states, trust appraisal, behavioral manifestations, and trust learning. Based on the synthesis of the findings, we recommended directions for future research and clinical assessment and intervention, such as managing trust during the early stages of therapy and considering improvements in trust processes as a central mechanism of change in treating individuals with BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Preti
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy.
| | - Juliette Richetin
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - Anita Poggi
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - Eric Fertuck
- City College of the City University of New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levine SM, Merz K, Keeser D, Kunz JI, Barton BB, Reinhard MA, Jobst A, Padberg F, Neukel C, Herpertz SC, Bertsch K, Musil R. Altered amygdalar emotion space in borderline personality disorder normalizes following dialectical behaviour therapy. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2023; 48:E431-E438. [PMID: 37935476 PMCID: PMC10635707 DOI: 10.1503/jpn.230085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by an inability to regulate emotions or accurately process the emotional states of others. Previous neuroimaging studies using classical univariate analyses have tied such emotion dysregulation to aberrant activity levels in the amygdala of patients with BPD. However, multivariate analyses have not yet been used to investigate how representational spaces of emotion information may be systematically altered in patients with BPD. METHODS Patients with BPD performed an emotional face matching task while undergoing MRI before and after a 10-week inpatient program of dialectical behavioural therapy. Representational similarity analysis (RSA) was applied to activity patterns (evoked by angry, fearful, neutral and surprised faces) in the amygdala and temporo-occipital fusiform gyrus of patients with BPD and in the amygdala of healthy controls. RESULTS We recruited 15 patients with BPD (8 females, 6 males, 1 transgender male) to participate in the study, and we obtained a neuroimaging data set for 25 healthy controls for a comparative analysis. The RSA of the amygdala revealed a negative bias in the underlying affective space (in that activity patterns evoked by angry, fearful and neutral faces were more similar to each other than to patterns evoked by surprised faces), which normalized after therapy. This bias-to-normalization effect was present neither in activity patterns of the temporo-occipital fusiform gyrus of patients nor in amygdalar activity patterns of healthy controls. LIMITATIONS Larger samples and additional questionnaires would help to better characterize the association between specific aspects of therapy and changes in the neural representational space. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest a more refined role for the amygdala in the pathological processing of perceived emotions and may provide new diagnostic and prognostic imaging-based markers of emotion dysregulation and personality disorders.Clinical trial registration: DRKS00019821, German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth M Levine
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Katharina Merz
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Daniel Keeser
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Julia I Kunz
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Barbara B Barton
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Matthias A Reinhard
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Andrea Jobst
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Frank Padberg
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Corinne Neukel
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Sabine C Herpertz
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Katja Bertsch
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| | - Richard Musil
- From the Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Bertsch); the NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Levine, Merz, Keeser, Bertsch); the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany (Merz, Keeser, Kunz, Barton, Reinhard, Jobst, Padberg, Musil); the Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany (Neukel, Herpertz, Bertsch); and the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich, Germany (Padberg, Bertsch)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gull M, Kaur N, Akhouri D. Perceived social support as related to social wellbeing in patients with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (EUPD). MIDDLE EAST CURRENT PSYCHIATRY 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43045-022-00264-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
People diagnosed with EUPD also known as borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience different challenges in their lives. These challenges include compulsive behavior, irritability, depression, sadness, guilt, shame, loneliness, grandiosity, and feeling of worthlessness. It is noteworthy that such challenges trigger among them a self-destructive behaviour, in addition to social isolation, and impaired social relationships. It is also found to significantly impact their physical, mental, and social wellbeing. This study is a humble attempt to examine the role of perceived social support in improving the social wellbeing of BPD outpatients. Through the purposive sampling technique, 100 BPD outpatients were selected for the study. The mean age of the participant was 25 years.
Results
It was found that perceived social support (family, friends, and significant others) plays a vital role in the wellbeing of these participants. The correlation between the two is positive as well as statistically significant. This means higher the support these patients experience from their relatives, the better is their social wellbeing.
Conclusions
This study has practical implications for counselors, clinical psychologists, and psychiatrists working in the field.
Collapse
|
5
|
Flechsenhar A, Levine S, Bertsch K. Threat induction biases processing of emotional expressions. Front Psychol 2022; 13:967800. [PMID: 36507050 PMCID: PMC9730731 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Threats can derive from our physical or social surroundings and bias the way we perceive and interpret a given situation. They can be signaled by peers through facial expressions, as expressed anger or fear can represent the source of perceived threat. The current study seeks to investigate enhanced attentional state and defensive reflexes associated with contextual threat induced through aversive sounds presented in an emotion recognition paradigm. In a sample of 120 healthy participants, response and gaze behavior revealed differences in perceiving emotional facial expressions between threat and safety conditions: Responses were slower under threat and less accurate. Happy and neutral facial expressions were classified correctly more often in a safety context and misclassified more often as fearful under threat. This unidirectional misclassification suggests that threat applies a negative filter to the perception of neutral and positive information. Eye movements were initiated later under threat, but fixation changes were more frequent and dwell times shorter compared to a safety context. These findings demonstrate that such experimental paradigms are capable of providing insight into how context alters emotion processing at cognitive, physiological, and behavioral levels. Such alterations may derive from evolutionary adaptations necessary for biasing cognitive processing to survive disadvantageous situations. This perspective sets up new testable hypotheses regarding how such levels of explanation may be dysfunctional in patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleya Flechsenhar
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany,*Correspondence: Aleya Flechsenhar,
| | - Seth Levine
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Bertsch
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany,NeuroImaging Core Unit Munich (NICUM), University Hospital LMU, Munich, Germany,Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Biermann M, Schulze A, Unterseher F, Hamm M, Atanasova K, Stahlberg D, Lis S. Trustworthiness judgments and Borderline Personality Disorder: an experimental study on the interplay of happiness and trustworthiness appraisals and the effects of wearing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2022; 9:27. [PMID: 36324166 PMCID: PMC9629878 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-022-00193-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Judging positive emotional states or the trustworthiness of others is important for forming and maintaining social affiliations. Past studies have described alterations in these appraisal processes in Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD), which might have been exacerbated during the Covid-19 pandemic by the requirement to wear face masks. In the present study, we investigated in an online-survey a) whether social judgments are particularly strongly affected in individuals with BPD when they have to judge happiness and trustworthiness in facial stimuli covered by a mask, b) whether appraising a positive emotional state affects trustworthiness appraisals differentially in BPD and healthy individuals and c) whether social judgments are related to how individuals with BPD experience wearing masks during the pandemic. METHODS Participants (67 HC, 75 BPD) judged happiness and trustworthiness of faces with calm expression with and without masks. Additionally, data on participants' confidence in their judgments, the experience of the burden induced by wearing masks, the protective benefits of masks, and compliance to wearing masks were collected. RESULTS Happiness and trustworthiness were evaluated less confidently and less intense in the BPD group compared to HC. Masks reduced happiness and trustworthiness ratings in both groups. Lower happiness appraisals contributed to lower trustworthiness appraisals except for those with BPD and low levels of symptom severity. Lower trustworthiness ratings were associated with a higher burden, attributing a lower benefit to masks and lower compliance with wearing masks in BPD. CONCLUSIONS Masks do not exacerbate deficits in social judgments. However, lower trustworthiness appraisals in general were linked with more negative evaluations of wearing masks in the BPD group. TRIAL REGISTRATION The aims and hypotheses were preregistered together with the design and planned analyses ( https://aspredicted.org/f5du7.pdf ). For findings of an additionally preregistered research question on the impact of adverse childhood experiences see supplementary material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Biermann
- Department of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany. .,Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Anna Schulze
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Franziska Unterseher
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marie Hamm
- Department of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.,Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Konstantina Atanasova
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Dagmar Stahlberg
- School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, A5, 6, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefanie Lis
- Department of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.,Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Felsenheimer AK, Kieckhäfer C, Rapp AM. Irony detection in patients with borderline personality disorder: an experimental study examining schizotypal traits, response biases and empathy. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2022; 9:24. [PMID: 36192806 PMCID: PMC9531442 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-022-00194-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In verbal irony we often convey meanings that oppose the literal words. To look behind these words, we need to integrate perspectives of ourselves, others, and their beliefs about us. Although patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience problems in social cognition and schizotypal symptoms, research on irony comprehension mainly focused on the schizophrenic spectrum. Accounting for possible negative biases in BPD, the current study examined the detection of praising and critical irony in a text messaging interface. METHODS The cross-sectional study included 30 patients and 30 matched controls, who completed measures of cognitive and affective empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index, IRI), schizotypal (Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire; SPQ), and borderline symptoms (Borderline Symptom List; BSL-23) and the irony detection task. The irony task contained critical and praising remarks embedded in text messages. Asking for literality (ironic vs. literal) and intention ratings (critical to praising) of the stimuli, it allowed to analyze the sensitivity of literality detection as well as implicit and explicit response biases in a signal detection framework. RESULTS Borderline symptoms explained lower sensitivity for the detection of literal and ironic statements across groups. Whereas HC showed a negativity bias when implicitly asked about the literalness of the statement, patients with BPD perceived praising utterances as less praising when explicitly asked about their perceived intention. Neither empathy nor schizotypy explained outcomes beyond borderline symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This was the first study to show lower detection of verbal irony in patients with BPD. While patients were less biased when asked about the literality of a statement, they perceived praising remarks as less positive on explicit measurements. The results highlight the importance of congruent, transparent communication in promoting epistemic trust in individuals with BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Katrin Felsenheimer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- Max Planck School of Cognition , Max Planck Institut for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences , Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Carolin Kieckhäfer
- LVR Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Michael Rapp
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Model of Trust. GAMES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/g13030039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Trust is central to a large variety of social interactions. Different research fields have empirically and theoretically investigated trust, observing trusting behaviors in different situations and pinpointing their different components and constituents. However, a unifying, computational formalization of those diverse components and constituents of trust is still lacking. Previous work has mainly used computational models borrowed from other fields and developed for other purposes to explain trusting behaviors in empirical paradigms. Here, I computationally formalize verbal models of trust in a simple model (i.e., vulnerability model) that combines current and prospective action values with beliefs and expectancies about a partner’s behavior. By using the classic investment game (IG)—an economic game thought to capture some important features of trusting behaviors in social interactions—I show how variations of a single parameter of the vulnerability model generates behaviors that can be interpreted as different “trust attitudes”. I then show how these behavioral patterns change as a function of an individual’s loss aversion and expectations of the partner’s behavior. I finally show how the vulnerability model can be easily extended in a novel IG paradigm to investigate inferences on different traits of a partner. In particular, I will focus on benevolence and competence—two character traits that have previously been described as determinants of trustworthiness impressions central to trust. The vulnerability model can be employed as is or as a utility function within more complex Bayesian frameworks to fit participants’ behavior in different social environments where actions are associated with subjective values and weighted by individual beliefs about others’ behaviors. Hence, the vulnerability model provides an important building block for future theoretical and empirical work across a variety of research fields.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mendez I, Sintes A, Pascual JC, Puntí J, Lara A, Briones-Buixassa L, Nicolaou S, Schmidt C, Romero S, Fernández M, Carmona I Farrés C, Soler J, Santamarina-Perez P, Vega D. Borderline personality traits mediate the relationship between low perceived social support and non-suicidal self-injury in a clinical sample of adolescents. J Affect Disord 2022; 302:204-213. [PMID: 35038480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a serious public health concern among adolescents, especially in clinical settings. Social support plays a critical role in the onset and maintenance of NSSI in adolescence. NSSI is closely associated with borderline personality disorder (BPD), yet no previous work has analyzed the mediating role of borderline traits in the relationship between perceived social support (PSS) and NSSI. This study aimed to address this gap. METHODS Participants were 228 adolescent patients (12 to 18 years old), who completed a clinical interview and self-report measures of BPD-traits, current psychological distress, emotion dysregulation and PSS. They were grouped based on the presence (vs. absence) of NSSI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors of NSSI, and a mediation analysis was conducted to examine the intermediary role of borderline traits in the relationship between PSS and NSSI. RESULTS NSSI was highly prevalent in our sample (58%) and was associated with higher clinical severity. Low PSS predicted NSSI in univariate, but not multivariate regression. Mediation analyses showed that borderline traits fully accounted for the relationship between low PSS and NSSI, even when controlling for current psychological distress and gender. LIMITATIONS Cross-sectional design through self-report assessment. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that adolescents with low PSS are especially vulnerable for developing NSSI due to elevated BPD traits. In clinical settings, interventions aimed to reduce borderline symptoms may be a promising treatment option for adolescents with NSSI and low PSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iria Mendez
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 2017SGR88, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Sintes
- Servicio de salud mental infantojuvenil, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Pascual
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica-Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Puntí
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Hospital de Dia de Adolescentes. Servicio de Salud Mental. Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anaís Lara
- Servicio de Psiquiatría y Psicología, ALTHAIA, Xarxa Assistencial i Universitària de Manresa, Barcelona, Manresa, Spain
| | - Laia Briones-Buixassa
- Mental Health and Social Innovation Research Group and Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Universitat de Vic - Universitat Central de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Stella Nicolaou
- PhD Programme in Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, Spain; Psychiatry and Mental Health Department, Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia & Fundació Sanitària d'Igualada, Hospital Universitari d'Igualada. Av. Catalunya 11, Barcelona, Igualada 08700, Spain
| | - Carlos Schmidt
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Department, Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia & Fundació Sanitària d'Igualada, Hospital Universitari d'Igualada. Av. Catalunya 11, Barcelona, Igualada 08700, Spain
| | - Soledad Romero
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 2017SGR88, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Fernández
- Servicio de salud mental infantojuvenil, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Carmona I Farrés
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica-Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Soler
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental. CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica-Sant Pau (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pilar Santamarina-Perez
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, 2017SGR88, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Vega
- Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Psychiatry and Mental Health Department, Consorci Sanitari de l'Anoia & Fundació Sanitària d'Igualada, Hospital Universitari d'Igualada. Av. Catalunya 11, Barcelona, Igualada 08700, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schulze A, Biermann M, Atanasova K, Unterseher F, Winkler L, Bohus M, Lis S. Social Touch, Social Isolation, and Loneliness in Borderline Personality Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:876413. [PMID: 35815051 PMCID: PMC9260178 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.876413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interpersonal impairments in borderline personality disorder (BPD) are characterised by a lack in the sense of belonging and the fear of being excluded. One feature of interactions that can promote a sense of social belonging is interpersonal touch. While some studies suggest that individuals with BPD experience social touch as less pleasurable than healthy individuals (HCs), there are no studies that investigated whether this difference is associated with feeling less socially connected. This question is particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic, since one central behavioural recommendation is "social distancing". An increase in loneliness has been discussed as a consequence and it has been suggested that individuals with BPD may be particularly burdened. However, the primary goal of "social distancing" is not preventing social contacts, but physical proximity. In our study we investigated the interplay between feeling close to others, contact frequency and the appraisal of social touch in BPD. We were additionally interested in whether these factors contribute to the burden through "physical distancing". METHODS We assessed subjective and objective social isolation, the need, importance, and liking of social touch, as well as the burden through "physical distancing" policies in 130 women (61 BPD and 69 HCs). RESULTS Participants of the BPD group reported higher loneliness, less social contacts and a lower need for, importance and liking of social touch compared to HCs. Larger social networks, higher frequency of in-person contacts and higher liking and importance of social touch were associated with lower levels of loneliness. Both groups did not differ regarding their burden through "physical distancing". A higher need for and lower importance of social touch predicted a higher burden through "physical distancing". CONCLUSIONS A positive appraisal of social touch was associated with less loneliness, independently of an individual's objective social isolation. In BPD, impairments of this fundamental facet of social interaction might hamper forming and strengthening of social bonds and contribute to the patients' interpersonal dysfunction. Changing the attitude towards social touch and in consequence its liking and importance in social interaction might provide one avenue to improve the sense of social connectedness in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schulze
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miriam Biermann
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Konstantina Atanasova
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Unterseher
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louisa Winkler
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bohus
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Lis
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Loneliness is a common experience in patients with personality disorders (PDs) that are characterized by impairment in self (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal functioning (empathy, intimacy). Here, we review studies assessing the association of loneliness with PD or PD traits including DSM-5's Alternative Model of PD (AMPD). RECENT FINDINGS The number of loneliness studies varied greatly among different PDs with most studies conducted in borderline PD. Across PDs, loneliness was associated with the severity of psychopathological symptoms and with several AMPD trait domains. Consequently, loneliness may contribute to PD severity and further impair personality functioning. Loneliness and PD share intra- and interpersonal factors (i.e., increased rejection sensitivity, information processing biases, social withdrawal) and common origins in childhood maltreatment that may explain their close association. Future research needs to investigate mechanisms on how loneliness and core characteristics of PD mutually reinforce each other in order to therapeutically address loneliness in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias A. Reinhard
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Tabea Nenov-Matt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstr. 7, 80336 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Caudate hyperactivation during the processing of happy faces in borderline personality disorder. Neuropsychologia 2021; 163:108086. [PMID: 34774878 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotion dysfunction and anhedonia are main problems in borderline personality disorder (BPD). In the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we investigated neural activation during the processing of happy faces and its correlates with habitual emotion acceptance in patients with BPD. METHODS 22 women with BPD and 26 female healthy controls watched movie clips of happy and neutral faces during fMRI without any instruction of emotion regulation. To associate neural activation with habitual emotion acceptance, we included individual scores of the Emotion Acceptance Questionnaire (EAQ) as a covariate in brain data analysis. RESULTS All participants showed amygdala, temporal and occipital activation during the processing of happy compared to neutral faces. Compared with healthy controls, patients with BPD showed significantly more activation within the bilateral caudate. We did not find significant correlations with emotion acceptance. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate caudate hyperactivation in patients with BPD during the processing of happy faces. Although patients reported significantly less emotion acceptance of positive emotions, an association with neural activation was not detectable.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bohus M, Stoffers-Winterling J, Sharp C, Krause-Utz A, Schmahl C, Lieb K. Borderline personality disorder. Lancet 2021; 398:1528-1540. [PMID: 34688371 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00476-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental disorder with a high burden on patients, family members, and health-care systems. The condition was previously regarded as untreatable, but progress in understanding and management has resulted in earlier diagnosis and better treatment outcomes. A coherent syndrome of BPD typically onsets during adolescence (after age 12 years). BPD is often preceded by or co-develops with symptoms of internalising disorders (depression and anxiety), externalising disorders (conduct problems, hyperactivity, and substance use), or both. BPD is associated with various poor outcomes, including low occupational and educational attainment, lack of long-term relationships, increased partner conflict, sexual risk-taking, low levels of social support, low life satisfaction, and increased service use. Psychotherapy is the main treatment for BPD; drug treatment is only indicated for comorbid conditions that require medication, or during a crisis if psychosocial interventions are insufficient. Awareness of BPD by non-specialists, as well as specialists, is key to appropriate early intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bohus
- Institute for Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jutta Stoffers-Winterling
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carla Sharp
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Annegret Krause-Utz
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden Institute of Brain and Cognition, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Christian Schmahl
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Klaus Lieb
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lévay EE, Bajzát B, Unoka ZS. Expectation of Selfishness From Others in Borderline Personality Disorder. Front Psychol 2021; 12:702227. [PMID: 34489805 PMCID: PMC8416988 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Social difficulties are apparent in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Behavior in BPD is characterized by mistrust and expectations of malevolence from others. We examined whether there is an asymmetry between their social behavior and their belief about other people’s social motivations. Subjects completed a task where they had to allocate money between themselves and an imagined other they will not meet and interact with. In addition they also had to report their expectations about how the imagined other would solve the task. We hypothesized that even though BPD patients will act in a prosocial way, they will expect selfish behavior from the other. We used the Slider Measure of social value orientation (SVO) and also created a modified version of the measure to examine the discrepancy between the subjects’ own SVO and their expectations from other people. We compared the results of thirty clinically diagnosed BPD patients to a matched sample of healthy participants. Our results show that the BPD group’s selfishness expectations significantly outweigh the expectations of selfishness in the HC group (U = 269, p = 0.007). This result further supports the mistrust and negativity bias observed in various aspects of social interactions in BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Evelyn Lévay
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bettina Bajzát
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Szabolcs Unoka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Krause-Utz A, Frost R, Chatzaki E, Winter D, Schmahl C, Elzinga BM. Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder: Recent Experimental, Neurobiological Studies, and Implications for Future Research and Treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2021; 23:37. [PMID: 33909198 PMCID: PMC8081699 DOI: 10.1007/s11920-021-01246-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review article is to give an overview over recent experimental neurobiological research on dissociation in borderline personality disorder (BPD), in order to inform clinicians and to stimulate further research. First, we introduce basic definitions and models that conceptualize dissociation from a transdiagnostic perspective. Then, we discuss recent findings in BPD. RECENT FINDINGS Stress-related dissociation is a key symptom of BPD, closely linked to other core domains of the disorder (emotion dysregulation, identity disturbances, and interpersonal disturbances). The understanding of neurobiological correlates of dissociation across different psychiatric disorders (e.g., dissociative disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder) is steadily increasing. At the same time, studies explicitly focusing on dissociation in BPD are still scarce. There is evidence for adverse effects of dissociation on affective-cognitive functioning (e.g., interference inhibition), body perception, and psychotherapeutic treatment response in BPD. On the neural level, increased activity in frontal regions (e.g., inferior frontal gyrus) and temporal areas (e.g., inferior and superior temporal gyrus) during symptom provocation tasks and during resting state was observed, although findings are still diverse and need to be replicated. Conceptual differences and methodological differences in study designs and sample characteristics (e.g., comorbidities, trauma history) hinder a straightforward interpretation and comparison of studies. Given the potentially detrimental impact of dissociation in BPD, more research on the topic is strongly needed to deepen the understanding of this complex clinical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annegret Krause-Utz
- Institute of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Rachel Frost
- Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Elianne Chatzaki
- Institute of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dorina Winter
- Pain and Psychotherapy Research Lab, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Christian Schmahl
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Bernet M Elzinga
- Institute of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Seitz KI, Leitenstorfer J, Krauch M, Hillmann K, Boll S, Ueltzhoeffer K, Neukel C, Kleindienst N, Herpertz SC, Bertsch K. An eye-tracking study of interpersonal threat sensitivity and adverse childhood experiences in borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2021; 8:2. [PMID: 33397512 PMCID: PMC7784013 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-020-00141-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous eye-tracking studies provide preliminary evidence for a hypersensitivity to negative, potentially threatening interpersonal cues in borderline personality disorder (BPD). From an etiological point of view, such interpersonal threat hypersensitivity might be explained by a biological vulnerability along with a history of early life adversities. The objective of the current study was to investigate interpersonal threat hypersensitivity and its association with adverse childhood experiences (ACE) in patients with BPD employing eye-tracking technology. METHODS We examined a sample of 46 unmedicated, adult female patients with BPD and 25 healthy female volunteers, matched on age and intelligence, with a well-established emotion classification paradigm with angry, fearful, happy, and neutral facial expressions. ACE were assessed retrospectively with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. RESULTS Patients as compared to healthy volunteers reflexively directed their gaze more quickly towards the eyes of emotional and neutral faces and did not adapt their fixation patterns according to the facial expression presented. Misclassifying emotional and neutral faces as angry correlated positively with the patients' self-reported ACE. CONCLUSIONS Building on and extending earlier findings, our results are likely to suggest a visual hypervigilance towards the eyes of emotional and neutral facial expressions and a childhood trauma-related anger bias in patients with BPD. Given the lack of a clinical control group, the question whether these findings are specific for BPD has to remain open. Thus, further research is needed to elucidate the specificity of altered visual attention allocation and the role of ACE in anger recognition in patients with BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja I Seitz
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Johanna Leitenstorfer
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlene Krauch
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karen Hillmann
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabrina Boll
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kai Ueltzhoeffer
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Corinne Neukel
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kleindienst
- Institute for Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabine C Herpertz
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Bertsch
- Department of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Facial emotion recognition in borderline patients is unaffected by acute psychosocial stress. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 132:131-135. [PMID: 33091687 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterized by difficulties in social cognition and social interactions, which exacerbate under stress. A previous study found better facial emotion recognition (FER) in patients with personality disorders and healthy controls (HC) after stress. We recently reported that emotional empathy scores, i.e. the emotional response to another person's emotional state, were significantly lower in BPD patients than in HC after psychosocial stress. Cognitive empathy scores remained unaltered. The present study aims to further investigate the effect of psychosocial stress induced by the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) on FER as part of social cognition in patients with BPD. We randomized 43 women with BPD and 46 female HC to either the TSST or a placebo condition. Afterwards, participants were asked in an emotion recognition test to identify emotions in faces showing anger or sadness at low and high intensity. Both groups recognized emotions better at high intensity compared with low intensity. There was no effect of stress on FER performance and we found no difference between groups. This is in line with prior research on social cognition in BPD patients demonstrating that the ability to understand another person's perspective might be unaffected by acute stress.
Collapse
|
18
|
Honecker H, Bertsch K, Spieß K, Krauch M, Kleindienst N, Herpertz SC, Neukel C. Impact of a Mechanism-Based Anti-Aggression Psychotherapy on Behavioral Mechanisms of Aggression in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:689267. [PMID: 34421676 PMCID: PMC8374952 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Aggressive behavior is highly prevalent in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and represents a major burden for patients and their environment. Previous studies have hypothesized threat hypersensitivity, among other mechanisms, as a biobehavioral mechanism underlying aggressive behavior in patients with BPD. The effects of a 6-week mechanism-based anti-aggression psychotherapy (MAAP) for the group setting were tested in comparison to the effects of a non-specific supportive psychotherapy (NSSP) on this hypothesized mechanism and their relation to the effects on aggressive behavior. Methods: To assess mechanisms of reactive aggression, 38 patients with BPD (20 in MAAP and 18 in NSSP) and 24 healthy controls participated in an emotion classification task before and after therapy or at a similar interval of 7 weeks for controls, respectively. In addition, current reactive aggressive behavior was assessed by the externally directed overt aggression score of the Overt Aggression Scale Modified (OAS-M) at both time points. Mixed linear models were used to test for group differences and differential treatment effects. Results: Consistent with previous findings, patients showed longer response latencies and misclassified faces as angry more often than healthy controls. Comparing pre- and post-treatment measurements, the MAAP group showed an increase in response latency in classifying angry faces, whereas the NSSP group showed a decrease in latency. Furthermore, the difference between pre- and post-treatment response latencies in classifying emotional faces correlated with the reductions in reactive aggression in the MAAP group, but not in the NSSP group or healthy controls. Conclusion: The results suggest an impact of MAAP on threat sensitivity as well as cognitive control, which has also been previously hypothesized as a biobehavioral mechanism underlying reactive aggression in patients with BPD. In addition, our findings shed light on the importance of these two biobehavioral mechanisms underlying reactive aggression as mechanisms of change addressed by MAAP. Further studies are needed to determine whether the behavioral change is stable over time and to what extent this change is related to a stable reduction in reactive aggression in a larger group of patients with BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Honecker
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Bertsch
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karen Spieß
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marlene Krauch
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kleindienst
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine C Herpertz
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Corinne Neukel
- Department of General Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kleindienst N, Jungkunz M, Bohus M. A proposed severity classification of borderline symptoms using the borderline symptom list (BSL-23). Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2020; 7:11. [PMID: 32514359 PMCID: PMC7262769 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-020-00126-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) is a well-established self-rating instrument to assess the severity of borderline typical psychopathology. However, a classification of severity levels for the BSL-23 is missing. METHODS Data from 1.090 adults were used to develop a severity classification for the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23). The severity grading was based on the distribution of the BSL-23 in 241 individuals with a diagnosis of BPD. Data from three independent samples were used to validate the previously defined severity grades.These validation samples included a group of treatment seeking patients with a diagnosis of BPD (n = 317), a sample of individuals with mental illnesses other than BPD (n = 176), and a healthy control sample (n = 356). The severity grades were validated from comparisons with established assessment instruments such as the International Personality Disorders Examination, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the global severity index of the Symptom Checklist (GSI, SCL-90), the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). RESULTS Six grades of symptom severity were defined for the BSL-23 mean score: none or low: 0-0.3; mild: 0.3-0.7; moderate: 0.7-1.7; high: 1.7-2.7; very high: 2.7-3.5; and extremely high: 3.5-4. These grades received consistent empirical support from the independent instruments and samples. For instance, individuals with a severity grade of none or low were virtually free from diagnostic BPD-criteria, had a GSI below the normative population, and a high level of global functioning corresponding to few or no symptoms. Severity grades indicating high to extremely high levels of BPD symptoms were observed at a much higher rate in treatment-seeking patients (70.0%) than in clinical controls (17.6%) and healthy controls (0.0%). The BSL-23 score that best separated treatment-seeking BPD patients and clinical controls was 1.50, whereas the clearest discrimination of BPD patients and healthy controls was found at a score of 0.64. CONCLUSIONS The grades of BPD-specific symptom severity derived from the distribution of the BSL-23 scores received consistent empirical validation from established assessments for psychopathology. Future studies should expand this validation by including additional instruments e.g., to assess self-esteem, loneliness, connectedness, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaus Kleindienst
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany / Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Martin Jungkunz
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany / Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Section for Translational Medical Ethics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bohus
- Institute of Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, J5, D-68159 Mannheim, Germany / Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, J5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany.,McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|