Seizure prophylaxis in the neuroscience intensive care unit

A 30-year perspective of low-dose dexamethasone, a single dose of mannitol and antiseizures prophylaxis on the prognosis of pneumococcal meningitis

OBJECTIVES

This study details the accumulated experience of more than 31 years using a low-dose systematic dexamethasone protocol with mannitol and antiseizure prophylaxis for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal meningitis.

METHODS

Data have been prospectively collected for the period1977-2018. From 1987, patients with suspected pneumococcal meningitis received 12 mg dexamethasone followed by 4 mg/6 h for 48 h, started before or with the first antibiotic dose. They also received (1) a single intravenous dose of 0.5-1 g/Kg mannitol, and (2) antiseizure prophylaxis with phenytoin.

RESULTS

In total, 363 episodes of pneumococcal meningitis were recorded. Of these, 242 were treated with the dexamethasone protocol after 1987 and 121 were treated without the protocol. Overall mortality was 11.6% (28/242) among patients treated with dexamethasone and 35% (43/121) among those treated without dexamethasone (p = 0.000). Early mortality was significantly lower at 5.8% (14/242) with dexamethasone and 24% (29/121) without dexamethasone (p = 0.000). Finally, neurological mortality was significantly lower at 7.4% (18/242) with dexamethasone and 23% (28/121) without dexamethasone (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

A low dose of dexamethasone along with a single dose of mannitol and antiseizures prophylaxis might be useful for reducing both overall and early mortality in pneumococcal meningitis in adult patients.

Current and Emerging Endovascular and Neurocritical Care Management Strategies in Large-Core Ischemic Stroke

The volume of infarcted tissue in patients with ischemic stroke is consistently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Initial studies of endovascular thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion excluded patients with established large-core infarcts, even when large volumes of salvageable brain tissue were present, due to the high risk of hemorrhagic transformation and reperfusion injury. However, recent retrospective and prospective studies have shown improved outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy, and several clinical trials were recently published to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular management of patients presenting with large-core infarcts. With or without thrombectomy, patients with large-core infarcts remain at high risk of in-hospital complications such as hemorrhagic transformation, malignant cerebral edema, seizures, and others. Expert neurocritical care management is necessary to optimize blood pressure control, mitigate secondary brain injury, manage cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure, and implement various neuroprotective measures. Herein, we present an overview of the current and emerging evidence pertaining to endovascular treatment for large-core infarcts, recent advances in neurocritical care strategies, and their impact on optimizing patient outcomes.

Deep Sedation in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of mortality and disability in adults. In cases of severe TBI, preventing secondary brain injury by managing intracranial hypertension during the acute phase is a critical treatment challenge. Among surgical and medical interventions to control intracranial pressure (ICP), deep sedation can provide comfort to patients and directly control ICP by regulating cerebral metabolism. However, insufficient sedation does not achieve the intended treatment goals, and excessive sedation can lead to fatal sedative-related complications. Therefore, it is important to continuously monitor and titrate sedatives by measuring the appropriate depth of sedation. In this review, we discuss the effectiveness of deep sedation, techniques to monitor the depth of sedation, and the clinical use of recommended sedatives, barbiturates, and propofol in TBI.

Quantification of levetiracetam in plasma and urine and its application to a pharmacokinetic study of traumatic brain injury patients

Background: Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug used to prevent or treat seizure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to develop and validate methodology suitable for measuring levetiracetam concentrations in human plasma and urine. Methods: Plasma or urine (10 μl) samples were spiked with [²H₆]-levetiracetam and processed using an acetonitrile precipitation. ESI-LC-MS/MS was employed for analyte detection. Results: The levetiracetam calibration was linear from 0.1 to 50 mg/l in a combined matrix of plasma and urine. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision and accuracy in plasma were <7.7 and 109%, and in urine were <7.9 and 108%, respectively. Conclusion: The validated method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study of levetiracetam in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding the use of levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care - an overview

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most widely used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in clinical practice. This is due both to a different mechanism of action when compared to other ASMs and its easy handling. Indeed, because of its interesting pharmacokinetic properties, it is often used outside of the labelled indications, notably in the neurocritical setting as prophylaxis of epileptic seizures.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted and the most relevant studies on the pharmacokinetic properties of LEV were selected by two independent investigators. Current evidence on the use of ASM prophylaxis in the neurocritical setting was also reviewed, highlighting and discussing the strengths and limits of LEV as drug of choice for anti-epileptic prophylaxis in this scenario.

EXPERT OPINION

LEV has a "near-ideal" pharmacokinetic profile, which makes it an attractive drug for ASM prophylaxis in neurocritical care. However, current recommendations restrict ASMs prophylaxis to very selected circumstances and the role of LEV is marginal. Moreover, studies are generally designed to compare LEV versus phenytoin, whereas studies comparing LEV versus placebo are lacking. Further randomized trials will be needed to better elucidate LEV utility and its neuroprotective role in the neurocritical setting.

Risk of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in hospitalized trauma patients: A national data analysis

BACKGROUND

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is an uncommon occurrence in trauma victims. However, the syndrome can cause a prolonged hospital stay. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and validate the risk factors of AWS so that interventions can be applied to high-risk patients.

METHODS

All adult trauma patients with an injury severity score of ≥1 and greater than one hospital day were included in the study. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2013-2016 was accessed for the study. Patient demography, injury and comorbidities were compared between the patients who developed AWS and who did not develop AWS. The data were split into 2 datasets: training and testing. Eighty percent (80%) of the data was randomly selected for the training dataset to develop the risk factors. The remaining 20% of the data were used for validation of the risk factors using multivariable analysis. The receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were generated for model fitness. All P values <0.01 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 497,819 patients qualified for the study. Only 6,894 (1.38%) patients developed AWS during their hospitalization. The median age of the patients, who developed AWS, was 54 years. The patients were predominantly male (84% vs. 63.1%) and Caucasian (80.3% vs. 76.1%). The multivariable analysis showed an age range of 45 years to 74 years old, male gender, Caucasian race, a history of chronic alcoholic abuse, hypertension and cirrhosis increased the risk of AWS. The AUC of the model of 0.910, 95% CI; [0.901, 0.918] showed an excellent model for predicting the risk of the development of AWS.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1.4% of the trauma victims developed AWS. Certain patient demographic and comorbidity characteristics, and head injury have a higher risk of developing of AWS.

Neurologic Complications in the Postoperative Neurosurgery Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses neurologic complications encountered in the postoperative care of neurosurgical patients that are common or key to recognize in the immediate postoperative period. The major neurosurgical subspecialty procedures (cerebrovascular neurosurgery, neuro-oncology, epilepsy neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, CSF diversion, endovascular neurosurgery, and spinal surgery) are broadly included under craniotomy procedures, endovascular/vascular procedures, and spinal procedures. This article focuses on the range of complications inherent in these approaches with specific scenarios addressed as applicable.

RECENT FINDINGS

The morbidity and mortality related to neurosurgical procedures remains high, necessitating ongoing research and quality improvement efforts in perioperative screening, intraoperative management, surgical approaches, and postoperative care of these patients. Emerging research continues to investigate safer and newer options for routine neurosurgical approaches, such as coiling over clipping for amenable aneurysms, endoscopic techniques for transsphenoidal hypophysectomy, and minimally invasive spinal procedures; postoperative monitoring and care of patients after these procedures continues to be a key component in the continuum of care for improving outcomes.

SUMMARY

Postoperative care of patients undergoing major neurosurgical procedures is an integral part of many neurocritical care practices. Neurosurgeons often enlist help from neurologists to assist with evaluation, interpretation, and management of complications in routine inpatient settings. Awareness of the common neurologic complications of various neurosurgical procedures can help guide appropriate clinical monitoring algorithms and quality improvement processes for timely evaluation and management of these patients.

Pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in neurosurgical ICU patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs is dramatically altered in critical illness. Augmented renal clearance (ARC), a phenomenon characterized by creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 130 ml/min/1.73m², is commonly described in critically ill patients. Levetiracetam, an antiepileptic drug commonly prescribed for seizure prophylaxis in the neurosurgical ICU, undergoes predominant elimination via the kidneys. Hence, we hypothesize that current dosing practice of intravenous (IV) levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily is inadequate for critically ill patients due to enhanced drug elimination. The objectives of our study were to describe the population PK of levetiractam using a nonparametric approach to design an optimal dosing regimen for critically ill neurosurgical patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational, population PK study. Serial blood samples were obtained from neurosurgical ICU patients who received at least one dose of IV levetiracetam. We used uHPLC to analyze these samples and Pmetrics™ software to perform PK analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects were included, with a median age of 54 years and CrCl of 104 ml/min. A two-compartmental model with linear elimination adequately described the profile of levetiracetam. Mean clearance (CL) was 3.55 L/h and volume of distribution (V) was 18.8 L. No covariates were included in the final model. Monte Carlo simulations showed a low probability of target attainment (PTA, trough at steady state of ≥6 mg/L) with a standard dose of 500 mg twice daily. A dose of at least 1000 mg twice daily was required to achieve 80% PTA. Two subjects, both with subtherapeutic trough levels, developed early onset seizures.

CONCLUSION

Our study examined the population PK of levetiracetam in a critically ill neurosurgical population. We found that this population displayed higher clearance and required higher doses to achieve target levels.

The brain-gut axis: A prime therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. The primary focus of treating TBI is to prevent additional injury to the damaged brain tissue, known as secondary brain injury. This treatment can include treating the body's inflammatory response. Despite promise in animal models, anti-inflammatory therapy has failed to improve outcomes in human patients, suggesting a more targeted and precise approach may be needed. There is a bidirectional axis between the intestine and the brain that contributes to this inflammation in acute and chronic injury. The mechanisms for this interaction are not completely understood, but there is evidence that neural, inflammatory, endocrine, and microbiome signals all participate in this process. Therapies that target the intestine as a source of inflammation have potential to lessen secondary brain injury and improve outcomes in TBI patients, but to develop these treatments we need to better understand the mechanisms behind this intestinal inflammatory response.

Neuroprotective Methodologies of Co-Enzyme Q10 Mediated Brain Hemorrhagic Treatment: Clinical and Pre-Clinical Findings

Cerebral brain hemorrhage is associated with the highest mortality and morbidity despite only constituting approximately 10-15% of all strokes classified into intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage where most of the patients suffer from impairment in memory, weakness or paralysis in arms or legs, headache, fatigue, gait abnormality and cognitive dysfunctions. Understanding molecular pathology and finding the worsening cause of hemorrhage will lead to explore the therapeutic interventions that could prevent and cure the disease. Mitochondrial ETC-complexes dysfunction has been found to increase neuroinflammatory cytokines, oxidative free radicals, excitotoxicity, neurotransmitter and energy imbalance that are the key neuropathological hallmarks of cerebral hemorrhage. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), as a part of the mitochondrial respiratory chain can effectively restore these neuronal dysfunctions by preventing the opening of mitochondrial membrane transition pore, thereby counteracting cell death events as well as exerts an anti-inflammatory effect by influencing the expression of NF-kB1 dependent genes thus preventing the neuroinflammation and energy restoration. Due to behavior and biochemical heterogeneity in post cerebral brain hemorrhagic pattern different preclinical autologous blood injection models are required to precisely investigate the forthcoming therapeutic strategies. Despite emerging pre-clinical research and resultant large clinical trials for promising symptomatic treatments, there are very less pharmacological interventions demonstrated to improve post operative condition of patients where intensive care is required. Therefore, in current review, we explore the disease pattern, clinical and pre-clinical interventions under investigation and neuroprotective methodologies of CoQ10 precursors to ameliorate post brain hemorrhagic conditions.

A Practice-Based, Clinical Pharmacokinetic Study to Inform Levetiracetam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration (PADRE-01)

Limited data exist on the effect of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) methods on anti-epileptic drug pharmacokinetics (PK). This prospective practice-based PK study aims to assess the impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), a modality of CRRT, on levetiracetam PK in critically ill patients and to derive individualized dosing recommendations. Eleven patients receiving oral or intravenous levetiracetam and CVVH in various intensive care units at a large academic medical center were enrolled to investigate the need for dosing adjustments. Prefilter, postfilter, and ultrafiltrate samples were obtained before dosing, after the completion of the infusion or 1-hour postoral dose, and up to 6 additional time points postinfusion or postoral administration. Patient-specific blood and ultrafiltrate flow rates and laboratory values were also collected at the time of sampling. The average sieving coefficient (SC) for levetiracetam was 0.89 ± 0.1, indicating high filter efficiency. Six of the 11 patients experienced concentrations outside the reported therapeutic range (12-46 mg/L). The average volume of distribution was 0.73 L/kg. CVVH clearance contributes a major fraction of the total levetiracetam clearance (36-73%) in neurocritically ill patients. The average bias and precision of the estimated vs. observed total clearance value was ~ 10.6% and 21.5%. Major dose determinants were identified to be SC and effluent flow rate. Patients with higher ultrafiltrate rates will have increased drug clearance and, therefore, will require higher doses in order to match exposures seen in patients with normal renal function.

Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Neurocritical Care Unit: Assessment and Treatment Challenges

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) can range from mild jittery movements, nausea, sweating to more severe symptoms such as seizure and death. Severe AWS can worsen cognitive function, increase hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Due to a lack of reliable history of present illness in many patients with neurological injury as well as similarities in clinical presentation of AWS and some commonly encountered neurological syndromes, the true incidence of AWS in neurocritical care patients remains unknown. This review discusses challenges in the assessment and treatment of AWS in patients with neurological injury, including the utility of different scoring systems such as the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment and the Minnesota Detoxification Scale as well as the reliability of admission alcohol levels in predicting AWS. Treatment strategies such as symptom-based versus fixed dose benzodiazepine therapy and alternative agents such as baclofen, carbamazepine, dexmedetomidine, gabapentin, phenobarbital, ketamine, propofol, and valproic acid are also discussed. Finally, a treatment algorithm considering the neurocritical care patient is proposed to help guide therapy in this setting.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Critically Ill Children Taking Antiepileptic Drugs: A Retrospective Study

•

Critically ill children on anti-epileptic drugs often receive multiple concomitant drugs with potential to result in liver injury.

•

Antimicrobial drugs followed by drugs for stress ulcer prophylaxis form the major drug classes with the risk of DILI that are concomitantly administered with anti-epileptic drugs in critically ill children.

Background

Antiepileptic drugs are among the leading causes of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Due to critical illness, children admitted to intensive care units are more prone to DILI.

Objective

We attempted to elucidate the association between antiepileptic drug use and the associated factors resulting in DILI in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital.

Methods

We carried out an observational retrospective study on children receiving antiepileptic drugs. Details on their demographic characteristics, drugs, serum levels of antiepileptic drugs and liver function tests, and hospital stay were recorded. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences definitions were adhered to when defining DILI. LiverTox (https://livertox.nih.gov) and DILIrank were used to assess the risks of hepatotoxicity of the concomitant drugs. Regression models were developed for predicting DILI.

Results

Five out of 9 patients taking phenobarbitone (55.6%), 9 out of 12 taking phenytoin monotherapy (75%), 7 out of 10 taking phenytoin/phenobarbitone (70%), all 3 receiving phenytoin/phenobarbitone/valproate sodium, and 1 with phenytoin/carbamazepine developed DILI either in the form of hepatocellular injury or liver biochemical test abnormalities. None of the patients had cholestatic or mixed type of liver injury. All the critically ill children received at least 2 concomitant drugs with hepatotoxic potential. Concomitant category B hepatotoxic drugs and toxic drug levels were significantly associated with increased risk of DILI. Similarly, a trend was observed for less-DILI-concern concomitant drug class and toxic drug levels when the drugs were analyzed by DILIrank classification.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of critically ill children taking antiepileptic drugs experience DILI. Guidelines recommending use of drugs with reduced risk of potential hepatotoxicity for various concomitant disease states in such children admitted to intensive care units receiving antiepileptic drugs are urgently needed.

Prevention, Treatment, and Monitoring of Seizures in the Intensive Care Unit

The diagnosis and management of seizures in the critically ill patient can sometimes present a unique challenge for practitioners due to lack of exposure and complex patient comorbidities. The reported incidence varies between 8% and 34% of critically ill patients, with many patients often showing no overt clinical signs of seizures. Outcomes in patients with unidentified seizure activity tend to be poor, and mortality significantly increases in those who have seizure activity longer than 30 min. Prompt diagnosis and provision of medical therapy are crucial in order to attain successful seizure termination and prevent poor outcomes. In this article, we review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of seizures in the critically ill, various seizure monitoring modalities, and recommended medical therapy.