1
|
Zhang H, Wang J, Gao Y, Zheng P, Gong L. Suture Tape Augmentation Improves Posterior Stability After Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft With Single-Bundle Transtibial Technique. Arthroscopy 2024; 40:2045-2054. [PMID: 38142869 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with suture tape augmentation can yield more stability after isolated PCLR. METHODS A prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary isolated PCLR (control group) or isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation (study group) from January 2016 to September 2020. We analyzed subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner knee scores; posterior drawer test findings; posterior stress radiographs; and return-to-sports activity rates. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to evaluate clinical relevance (subjective IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores). RESULTS A total of 59 patients were included in this analysis (28 in control group and 31 in study group). The average length of follow-up was similar between the study and control groups (48.6 months vs 47.9 months, P = .800). Knee function was significantly improved in the study group in terms of subjective IKDC scores (85.1 ± 6.4 in study group vs 79.8 ± 6.4 in control group, P = .002), Lysholm scores (86.3 ± 7.4 vs 80.8 ± 7.4, P = .005), and Tegner scores (7.0 ± 1.4 vs 5.6 ± 1.7, P = .006). However, the differences between the control and study groups were less than the MCID for the subjective IKDC score and Lysholm score. In the control and study groups, 21.4% of patients (6 of 28) and 48.4% of patients (15 of 31), respectively, returned to their preinjury sports activity levels (P = .031). At last follow-up, the mean side-to-side difference in posterior laxity was significantly improved in the study group compared with the control group (1.52 ± 0.70 mm in study group vs 3.17 ± 2.01 mm in control group, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Primary isolated PCLR with suture tape augmentation provides better posterior stability than PCLR without suture tape augmentation at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. No differences between the groups were observed in the percentage of patients who met or exceeded the MCID for the subjective IKDC and Lysholm scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangzhou Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Sports Medicine Clinical Medical Research Center, Shenyang, China.
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China
| | - Yuzhong Gao
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China
| | - Peng Zheng
- Department of Orthopedics, Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Fushun Central Hospital, Fushun, China
| | - Lianhai Gong
- Department of Orthopedics, Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Hospital Benxi Iron and Steel General Hospital, Benxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Root C, Braman M, Srinivas M, Ringenberg J, Long R, Morey T, Vopat M, Vopat B. Suture Tape Augmentation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Shows Improved Biomechanical Stability With Equivalent Outcome and Complication Rates: A Scoping Review. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00246-9. [PMID: 38537724 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the current literature surrounding suture tape augmentation (STA) of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) with additional evaluation of PCLR+STA in clinical practice. METHODS A systematic search of 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science Core Collection) was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and was completed in April 2023 to identify studies related to PCLR+STA. Surgical technique, animal, biomechanical, and clinical studies were included for review with quality appraisal conducted according to study design. RESULTS A total of 380 articles were identified in the search, 6 of which met inclusion criteria. Biomechanical studies showed a significant reduction in posterior tibial translation with STA of PCLR in multiple studies. STA was found to decrease total elongation by 45% to 58% in multiple studies; increased load to failure was seen with STA as well in 1 study. Clinical studies showed equivalent or improved patient-reported outcomes with STA of PCLR compared with PCLR alone. CONCLUSIONS Biomechanical studies offer evidence showing the beneficial load-sharing properties of STA such as increased strength and ultimate load with decreased elongation of the graft, especially with larger forces. Clinical evidence illustrates improved or equivalent patient-reported outcomes to standard PCLR with no difference in complication rate. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STA of PCLR offers an opportunity to improve initial graft stability during the early healing phase through load sharing between the augmentation and the graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cooper Root
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A..
| | - Michael Braman
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Mukund Srinivas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Jonathan Ringenberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Rachel Long
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Tucker Morey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Matthew Vopat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| | - Bryan Vopat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loeb AE, Ithurburn MP, Kidwell-Chandler A, Atkinson A, Cain EL. Technique and Outcomes of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Augmentation. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671231213988. [PMID: 38264412 PMCID: PMC10804929 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231213988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries to the knee are uncommon, and ideal surgical management of these injuries is unclear. Current surgical techniques include PCL reconstruction with remnant debridement, remnant-preserving techniques, and primary PCL repair. Augmentation of PCL repairs and reconstructions has been proposed to protect repairs or grafts in the postoperative period. Purpose To describe PCL repair with the hamstring autograft augmentation technique and examine our preliminary midterm outcomes from a sequential cohort of patients. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The authors identified patients at their institution who underwent remnant-preserving primary PCL repair with hamstring autograft augmentation for both isolated tears and tears associated with multiligament knee injury (MLKI). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, the 12-item Short Form Survey, and a custom return-to-play questionnaire. Patient-reported outcomes data were summarized, and the predictors of outcomes from the descriptive data and clinical measures were further examined. Results A total of 23 patients with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 87% were associated with MLKI. The mean IKDC score was 87.7. Approximately 83% of patients were able to successfully return to their sport or occupation. Among 19 athletes, only 2 reported being unable to return to their preinjury level of sport because of limitations from their PCL surgery. Patient-reported outcome scores and return to sport or occupation did not have a statistically significant association with age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery, or follow-up time. Conclusion Outcomes of our cohort with remnant-preserving primary PCL repairs with hamstring autograft augmentation demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes to previously published PCL data. The advantages of remnant preservation, primary repair, and augmentation with an independent hamstring autograft reconstruction are combined within this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E. Loeb
- The American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- North Florida Orthopaedics, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew P. Ithurburn
- The American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Andrew Atkinson
- The American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - E. Lyle Cain
- The American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
- Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tavakoli Darestani R, Afzal S, Pourmojarab A, Baroutkoub M, Sayyadi S, Barati H. A comparative analysis of suture-augmented and standard hamstring autograft single-bundle ACL reconstruction outcomes: short-term functional benefits without long-term impact. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:971. [PMID: 38102582 PMCID: PMC10722839 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-07100-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Augmentation of the biologic graft with nonabsorbable suture material during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a relatively new technique to enhance its biomechanical properties and add additional support to the critical process of healing. We aimed to compare the short-term functional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates of patients treated with either standard single-bundle four-strand hamstring ACLR or added suture augmentation (SA). METHODS Patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR between February 2015-January 2017 and in the standard ACLR group, and between February 2017-September 2019 in the SA-ACLR group operated by adding a no.5 FiberWire® (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) braided suture to the hamstring autograft, were retrospectively reviewed and the PROMs were compared. Patients were followed up for a 24-month period and PROMs were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and Tegner-Lysholm knee score. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and postoperative complications including graft retear requiring revision surgery, deep vein thrombois, and surgical site infection were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS We included 79 patients with mean age of 31.6 ± 8.3 years in the standard ACLR group, and 90 patients with mean oge of 30.5 ± 7.6 in the SA-ACLR group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, body mass index, and medical comorbidities. The values of the IKDC scores increased to 75.8 ± 18.9 in the standard ACLR group, and 85.6 ± 12.6 in the SA-ACLR group, 24 months after the operation (P < 0.05). The 24-month postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores escalated to 79.3 ± 21.0 in the standard ACLR group and 91.0 ± 13.7 in the SA-ACLR group (P < 0.05). Four (5.1%) patients in the standard ACLR group and 4 (4.4%) in the SA-ACLR group experienced graft retear requiring revision surgery (P > 0.05). Incidence of surgical site infection and deep vein thrombosis showed no significant differences between the two groups, 24 months after ACLR. CONCLUSION SA-ACLR is associated with improved short-term functional PROMs compared to the standard hamstring ACLR. Although SA did not reduce the retear rate, and infection and DVT rates did not differ between study groups, superior improvement of PROMs in SA approach, leverages this method for ACLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Tavakoli Darestani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sina Afzal
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Pourmojarab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mojtaba Baroutkoub
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Sayyadi
- Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hasan Barati
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gensior TJ, Mester B, Achtnich A, Winkler PW, Henkelmann R, Hepp P, Glaab R, Krause M, Frosch KH, Zellner J, Schoepp C. Anatomic repair and ligament bracing as an alternative treatment option for acute combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial or posterolateral corner-results of a multicentre study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:7123-7132. [PMID: 37691046 PMCID: PMC10635947 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05015-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Combined PCL injuries involving the posteromedial/-lateral corner (PMC/PLC) usually require surgical management. Literature shows controversy regarding the standards of treatment. Suture-augmented repair leads to excellent results in acute knee dislocations but has not been investigated clinically in combined PCL injuries. The purpose of this multicentre study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of this technique in acute combined PCL injuries. MATERIALS & METHODS N = 33 patients with acute combined PCL injuries involving the PMC/PLC were treated by one-stage suture repair with ligament bracing of the PCL and suture repair of the accompanying PMC/PLC injuries with/without ligament bracing or primary augmentation by semitendinosus autograft. Outcome was assessed by IKDC questionnaire, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale and KOOS. Additional PCL stress-radiography was performed. RESULTS N = 31 patients with combined PCL injuries (female: male = 7:24; age 39.1 ± 13.8 years) with a follow-up of 16.8 ± 9.6 months were finally evaluated. 18 had PMC injuries, 13 PLC injuries. 32.2% presented with accompanying meniscal tears (70% medial meniscus). 19.4% showed cartilage injuries grade III-IV. Complications included one infection and four knee stiffnesses. Three had symptomatic postoperative instability, all affiliated to the PLC group. The IKDC was 69.8 ± 16.5, Lysholm score 85 ± 14.4 and KOOS 89.7 ± 8.1. Median loss of activity (Tegner) was 0.89 ± 1.31. Comparing PMC and PLC, all scores showed a tendency towards more favourable outcomes in the PMC group (n.s.). Stress-radiography showed an overall side-to-side difference of 3.7 ± 3.8 mm. Subgroup evaluation showed statistically significant better results (p = 0.035) of PMC (2.5 ± 1.5 mm) versus PLC (5.8 ± 5.6 mm). CONCLUSIONS One-stage suture repair with ligament bracing is a viable technique for acute combined PCL injuries and predominantly leads to good and excellent clinical outcomes. Patients with PLC injuries show a tendency towards inferior outcomes and higher instability rates compared to PMC injuries. These results may help in therapy planning and counselling patients with these rare injury pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias J Gensior
- OPND Clinic Neuss-Düsseldorf, Neuss, Germany
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bastian Mester
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Andrea Achtnich
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Ligament Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp W Winkler
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Ralf Henkelmann
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Hepp
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Richard Glaab
- Department of Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Krause
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Ligament Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl-Heinz Frosch
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sports Traumatology, BG Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Zellner
- Sporthopaedicum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Trauma Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Schoepp
- Clinic for Arthroscopic Surgery, Sports Traumatology and Sports Medicine, BG Clinic Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
- Ligament Committee of the AGA (Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery), Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hinz M, Geyer S, Winden F, Braunsperger A, Kreuzpointner F, Irger M, Imhoff AB, Mehl J. Clinical and biomechanical outcomes following patellar tendon repair with suture tape augmentation. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:3569-3576. [PMID: 37233797 PMCID: PMC10651537 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03572-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patellar tendon ruptures (PTR) occur predominantly in middle-aged patients following indirect trauma. The aim of this study was to quantify the short-term results using a suture tape augmentation technique for the repair of PTR. METHODS All consecutive patients with acute (< 6 weeks) PTR who underwent suture tape augmentation between 03/2014 and 11/2019 at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were retrospectively evaluated. Outcome measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) and return to sport rates, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form (IKDC) as well as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Additionally, a standardized clinical examination and an isometric strength evaluation of knee extension and flexion were performed. It was hypothesized that high return to sport rates and good functional outcome would be observed and that the majority of patients would not present with a severe (> 20%) knee extension strength deficit when compared to the contralateral side. RESULTS A total of 7 patients (mean age 37.0 ± SD 13.5 years; 6 male/1 female) were available for final assessment at a median follow-up of 17.0 (25-75% IQR 16.0-77.0) months. Three injuries occurred during ball sports, two injuries occurred during winter sports, and one injury each occurred during a motorcycling and skateboarding accident. The average time between trauma and surgery was 4.7 ± 2.6 days. At follow-up, patients reported little pain (VAS: 0 [0-0.4]). Return to sport was possible for all patients 8.9 ± 4.0 months postoperatively at a high level (TAS: 7.0 [6.0-7.0]). Five patients (71.4%) returned to the preinjury level of play, and 2 (28.6%) did not return to the preinjury level of play. Patient-reported outcome measures were moderate to good (Lysholm score: 80.4 ± 14.5; IKDC: 84.2 ± 10.6; KOOS subscales: pain 95.6 ± 6.0, symptoms 81.1 [64.9-89.1], activities of daily living 98.5 [94.1-100], sport and recreation function 82.9 ± 14.1 and knee-related quality of life 75.9 ± 16.3). All patients were very satisfied (57.1%) or satisfied (42.9%) with the postoperative result. No postoperative complications were reported. Strength measurements revealed a severe knee extension deficit in 3 patients (42.9%), but no significant deficit of isometric knee extension or flexion strength in comparison with the contralateral side was observed overall (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Suture tape augmentation in acute PTR repair leads to good functional outcome without major complications. Although a severe knee extension strength deficit may occur in some patients postoperatively, an excellent return to sports rate and high patient satisfaction can be expected nonetheless. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Retrospective cohort study; III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Hinz
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Stephanie Geyer
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Felix Winden
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Braunsperger
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Prevention Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kreuzpointner
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Prevention Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Irger
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas B Imhoff
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Mehl
- Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thompson AA, Bolia IK, Fathi A, Dobitsch A, Cruz CA, Grewal R, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA, Hatch III GF. Tissue Augmentation Techniques in the Management of Ligamentous Knee Injuries. Orthop Res Rev 2023; 15:215-223. [PMID: 38028655 PMCID: PMC10657762 DOI: 10.2147/orr.s385817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite early reports of high failure rates in knee ligament repair techniques resulting in favor of reconstruction, newer advances in surgical technology have shifted the attention back to repair with the addition of various tissue augmentation techniques. Ligament repair preserves proprioceptors in the native ligament and avoids autograft tendon harvest, minimizing the complications associated with donor site ruptures in reconstruction techniques. Tissue augmentation has been successfully used in knee ligamentous and tendon repair procedures, as well as in some upper extremity procedures. This study provides a clinical update on the surgical techniques, biomechanics, and outcomes with the application of various tissue augmentation techniques in the ligaments surrounding the knee joint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Thompson
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Ioanna K Bolia
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Amir Fathi
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Andrew Dobitsch
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Christian A Cruz
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Rajvarun Grewal
- California Health Sciences University, Clovis, CA, 93612, USA
| | - Alexander E Weber
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Frank A Petrigliano
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - George F Hatch III
- USC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hunt KJ, Hewitt MA, Buckley SE, Bartolomei J, Myerson MS, Hogan MV, Laf Committee ISAKOS. Ligament augmentation repair is broadly applied across different orthopaedic subspecialities: an ISAKOS international survey of orthopaedic surgeons. J ISAKOS 2023; 8:239-245. [PMID: 37100118 DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate how ligament augmentation repair (LAR) techniques are currently used in different anatomic regions in orthopaedic sports medicine, and to identify the most common indications and limitations of LAR. METHODS We sent survey invitations to 4,000 members of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine society. The survey consisted of 37 questions total, with members only receiving some branching questions specific to their area of specialisation. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and the significance between groups was evaluated using chi-square tests of independence. RESULTS Of 515 surveys received, 502 were complete and included for the analysis (97% completion rate). 27% of respondents report from Europe, 26% South America, 23% Asia, 15% North America, 5.2% Oceania, and 3.4% Africa. 75% of all survey respondents report using LAR, most frequently using it for the anterior talofibular ligament ( 69%), acromioclavicular joint ( 58%), and the anterior cruciate ligament (51%). Surgeons in Asia report using LAR the most (80%), and surgeons in Africa the least (59%). LAR is most commonly indicated for additional stability (72%), poor tissue quality (54%), and more rapid return-to-play (47%). LAR users state their greatest limitation is cost (62%), while non-LAR users state their greatest reason not to use LAR is that patients do well without it (46%). We also find that the frequency of LAR use among surgeons may differ based on practice characteristics and training. For example, surgeons who treat athletes at the professional or Olympic level are significantly more likely to have a high annual use of LAR (20+ cases) compared to surgeons that treat only recreational athletes (45% and 25%, respectively, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION LAR is broadly applied in orthopaedics but its rate of use is not homogeneous. Outcomes and perceived benefits vary depending on factors such as surgeon specialty and treatment population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth J Hunt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Michael A Hewitt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Sara E Buckley
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Jonathan Bartolomei
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Mark S Myerson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - MaCalus V Hogan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - I S A K O S Laf Committee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1635 Aurora Ct., 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nestorovoski DL, Haratian R, Guzman A, Bolia IK, Chen JL, Liu JN, Petrigliano FA, Weber AE, Rick Hatch GF. All-Inside PCL Reconstruction, Double Bundle, With Internal Brace Augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 2023; 12:e1211-e1218. [PMID: 37533902 PMCID: PMC10391337 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PCL reconstructive techniques are constantly evolving, and further clinical studies are needed to definitively understand the potential benefits of internal brace augmentation and anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction. This Technical Note reports an arthroscopic all-inside anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation that is effective and reproducible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas L. Nestorovoski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Ryan Haratian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Alvarho Guzman
- Advanced Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Ioanna K. Bolia
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - James L. Chen
- Advanced Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Joseph N. Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Frank A. Petrigliano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Alexander E. Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - George. F. Rick Hatch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vandenrijt J, Callenaere S, Van der Auwera D, Michielsen J, Van Dyck P, Heusdens CHW. Posterior cruciate ligament repair seems safe with low failure rates but more high level evidence is needed: a systematic review. J Exp Orthop 2023; 10:49. [PMID: 37099086 PMCID: PMC10133428 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00605-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To discuss recent literature on posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repair and report on the clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In August 2022, three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies on PCL repair by two independent reviewers. Articles published between January 2000 and August 2022 focussing on the clinical and/or radiological outcomes, following PCL repair, were included. Patient demographic data, clinical evaluations, patient‑reported outcome measures, post-operative complications and radiological outcomes were extracted. RESULTS Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 226 patients with a mean age ranging from 22.4 to 38.8 years and mean follow-up periods ranging from 14 to 78.6 months. Seven studies (77.8%) were level IV and two studies (22.2%) were level III. Arthroscopic PCL repair was performed in four studies (44.4%) while the remaining five studies (55.6%) described open PCL repair. In four studies (44.4%) additional suture augmentation was applied. Arthrofibrosis affected a combined total of 24 patients (11.7%; range 0-21.0%) making it the most common complication and the overall failure rate was 5.6%, ranging from 0 to 15.8%. Two studies (22.2%) performed post-operative MRI and confirmed PCL healing. CONCLUSION This systematic review indicates that PCL repair can be a safe procedure with an overall failure rate of 5.6%, ranging from 0% to 15.8%. However, more high quality research is necessary before widespread clinical implementation is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Vandenrijt
- Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, 2650, Belgium
| | - Sofie Callenaere
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
| | - Dries Van der Auwera
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
| | - Jozef Michielsen
- Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, 2650, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
| | - Pieter Van Dyck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, 2650, Belgium
| | - Christiaan H W Heusdens
- Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem, 2650, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clinical Research Progress of Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation Technique in Knee Ligament Injury Repair and Reconstruction: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12051999. [PMID: 36902785 PMCID: PMC10004357 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Knee ligament injuries are most common in sports injuries. In general, ligament repair or reconstruction is necessary to restore the stability of the knee joint and prevent secondary injuries. Despite advances in ligament repair and reconstruction techniques, a number of patients still experience re-rupture of the graft and suboptimal recovery of motor function. Since Dr. Mackay's introduction of the internal brace technique, there has been continuous research in recent years using the internal brace ligament augmentation technique for knee ligament repair or reconstruction, particularly in the repair or reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. This technique focuses on increasing the strength of autologous or allograft tendon grafts through the use of braided ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene suture tapes to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and avoid re-rupture or failure. The purpose of this review is to present detailed research progress in the internal brace ligament enhancement technique of knee ligament injury repair as well as the reconstruction from biomechanical and histological research and clinical studies and to comprehensively assess the value of the application of this technique.
Collapse
|
12
|
Suture Augmentation in Orthopaedic Surgery Offers Improved Time-Zero Biomechanics and Promising Short-Term Clinical Outcomes. Arthroscopy 2023; 39:1357-1365. [PMID: 36681361 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Ligament and tendon ruptures have historically been addressed with varying techniques involving either repair or reconstruction. More recently, the potential biomechanical benefits of suture augmentation (SA), also known as internal brace, have attracted substantial attention and helped renew interest in ligament repair surgery. We evaluated the biomechanical and clinical outcomes of SA-based techniques in the following sports medicine procedures: medial ulnar collateral ligament repair of the elbow, thumb collateral ligament repair, anterior cruciate ligament repair, Achilles' tendon repair, and deltoid ligament repair. Published data on the use of SA to augment repairs of the ulnar collateral ligament, thumb collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, Achilles' tendon, and deltoid ligament repair demonstrates improved time-zero biomechanical and promising short to mid-term clinical outcomes. However, surgeons must be wary of potential complications, including joint over-constraint, nerve paresthesia, and infection.
Collapse
|
13
|
Holuba K, Uppstrom TJ, Apostolakos J, DiFelice GS. Rare Fracture Knee Dislocation Treated with Ligament Repair and Novel Arcuate Fracture Repair Technique: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202303000-00032. [PMID: 36853968 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.22.00385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
CASE A 57-year-old man presented with a left knee dislocation after a motor vehicle collision. Clinical and imaging evaluation demonstrated disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), anterolateral ligament (ALL), and posterolateral corner (PLC). The patient underwent acute, single-stage arthroscopic primary ACL and PCL repair, with arcuate fracture fixation using a novel technique. At 4 years postoperatively, he continues to do well subjectively with minimal clinical laxity. CONCLUSION Acute, single-stage arthroscopic primary ligamentous repair is a viable option for high-grade multiligamentous knee dislocations and may be combined with our novel technique for arcuate fracture fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Case Report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Holuba
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Therrien E, Pareek A, Song BM, Wilbur RR, Till SE, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Levy BA. Comparison of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221137357. [PMID: 36479468 PMCID: PMC9720802 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221137357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biomechanical studies support the use of suture tape reinforcement for limiting graft elongation and increasing strength in knee ligament reconstructions. Purpose To compare posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) laxity, complication and reoperation rates, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after all-inside single-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) with versus without independent suture tape reinforcement. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent primary, all-inside allograft single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a single academic institution from 2012 to 2019. Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including the International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm scores), bilateral comparison kneeling radiographs, and physical examination findings were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Results Included were 50 patients: 19 with suture tape reinforcement (mean age 30.6 ± 2.9 years) and 31 without suture tape reinforcement (control group; mean age 26.2 ± 1.6 years). One PCLR graft in the suture tape group failed. Posterior drawer examination revealed grade 1+ laxity in 4 of 19 (21%) of the suture tape cohort versus 6 of 31 (19%) of the control cohort (P > .999). Bilateral kneeling radiographs showed similar side-to-side differences in laxity between the groups (suture tape vs control: mean, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm; P = .361). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in postoperative IKDC (suture tape vs control: 79.3 vs 79.6; P = .779), Lysholm (87.5 vs 84.3; P = .828), or Tegner activity (5.6 vs 5.7; P = .562) scores. Conclusion All-inside single-bundle PCLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement demonstrated low rates of graft failure, complications, and reoperations, with satisfactory PROs at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic posterior tibial translation was comparable between the 2 groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Therrien
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ayoosh Pareek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bryant M. Song
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ryan R. Wilbur
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sara E. Till
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aaron J. Krych
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael J. Stuart
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bruce A. Levy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. ,Bruce A. Levy, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|