1
|
Curkic Kapidzic S, Gustafsson J, Larsson E, Jessen L, Sjögreen Gleisner K. Kidney dosimetry in [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy based on multiple small VOIs. Phys Med 2024; 120:103335. [PMID: 38555793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim was to investigate the use of multiple small VOIs for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy. METHOD The study was based on patient and simulated SPECT images in anthropomorphic geometries. Images were reconstructed using two reconstruction programs (local LundaDose and commercial Hermia) using OS-EM with and without resolution recovery (RR). Five small VOIs were placed to determine the average activity concentration (AC) in each kidney. The study consisted of three steps: (i) determination of the number of iterations for AC convergence based on simulated images; (ii) determination of recovery-coefficients (RCs) for 2 mL VOIs using a separate set of simulated images; (iii) assessment of operator variability in AC estimates for simulated and patient images. Five operators placed the VOIs, using for guidance: a) SPECT/CT with RR, b) SPECT/CT without RR, and c) CT only. For simulated images, time-integrated ACs (TIACs) were evaluated. For patient images, estimated ACs were compared with results of a previous method based on whole-kidney VOIs. RESULTS Eight iterations and ten subsets were sufficient for both programs and reconstruction settings. Mean RCs (mean ± SD) with RR were 1.03 ± 0.02 (LundaDose) and 1.10 ± 0.03 (Hermia), and without RR 0.91 ± 0.03 (LundaDose) and 0.94 ± 0.03 (Hermia). Most stable and accurate estimates of the AC were obtained using five 2-mL VOIs guided by SPECT/CT with RR, applying them to images without RR, and including an explicit RC for recovery correction. CONCLUSION The small VOI method based on five 2-mL VOIs was found efficient and sufficiently accurate for kidney dosimetry in [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Curkic Kapidzic
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden.
| | | | - Erik Larsson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Lovisa Jessen
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salvadori J, Allegrini O, Opsommer T, Carullo J, Sarrut D, Porot C, Ritzenthaler F, Meyer P, Namer IJ. Anatomy-based correction of kidney PVE on [Formula: see text] SPECT images. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:15. [PMID: 38316677 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00612-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), accurate quantification of kidney activity on post-treatment SPECT images paves the way for patient-specific treatment. Due to the limited spatial resolution of SPECT images, the partial volume effect (PVE) is a significant source of quantitative bias. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance and robustness of anatomy-based partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms to recover the accurate activity concentration of realistic kidney geometries on [Formula: see text]Lu SPECT images recorded under clinical conditions. METHODS Based on the CT scan data from patients, three sets of fillable kidneys with surface-to-volume (S:V) ratios ranging from 1.5 to 2.8 cm-1, were 3D printed and attached in a IEC phantom. Quantitative [Formula: see text]Lu SPECT/CT acquisitions were performed on a GE Discovery NM CT 870 DR camera for the three modified IEC phantoms and for 6 different Target-To-Background ratios (TBRs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12). Two region-based (GTM and Labbé) and five voxel-based (GTM + MTC, Labbé + MTC, GTM + RBV, Labbé + RBV and IY) methods were evaluated with this data set. Additionally, the robustness of PVC methods to Point Spread Function (PSF) discrepancies, registration mismatches and background heterogeneity was evaluated. RESULTS Without PVC, the average kidney RCs across all TBRs ranged from 0.66 ± 0.05 (smallest kidney) to 0.80 ± 0.03 (largest kidney). For a TBR of 12, all anatomy-based method were able to recover the kidneys activity concentration with an error < 6%. All methods result in a comparable decline in RC restoration with decreasing TBR. The Labbé method was the most robust against PSF and registration mismatches but was also the most sensitive to background heterogeneity. Among the voxel-based methods, MTC images were less uniform than RBV and IY images at the outer edge of high uptake areas (kidneys and spheres). CONCLUSION Anatomy-based PVE correction allows for accurate SPECT quantification of the [Formula: see text]Lu activity concentration with realistic kidney geometries. Combined with recent progress in deep-learning algorithms for automatic anatomic segmentation of whole-body CT, these methods could be of particular interest for a fully automated OAR dosimetry pipeline with PVE correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Salvadori
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France.
| | - Oreste Allegrini
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Opsommer
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - Josefina Carullo
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - David Sarrut
- Université de Lyon, CREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Clemence Porot
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Philippe Meyer
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
- ICUBE, CNRS UMR-7357, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Izzie-Jacques Namer
- Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
- ICUBE, CNRS UMR-7357, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Staanum PF. Tumor dosimetry using 177Lu: influence of background activity, measurement method and reconstruction algorithm. EJNMMI Phys 2023; 10:39. [PMID: 37341930 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00561-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-based tumor dosimetry after radionuclide therapy, using the isotope 177Lu, finds application e.g., for tumor-to-organ dose comparison and for dose response evaluation. When the tumor extent is not much larger than the image resolution, and when 177Lu is found in nearby organs or other tumors, an accurate determination of tumor dose is particularly challenging. Here a quantitative evaluation of three different methods for determining the 177Lu activity concentration in a phantom is performed, and the dependence on a variety of parameters is described. The phantom (NEMA IEC body phantom) has spheres of different size in a background volume, and sphere-to-background 177Lu activity concentration ratios of infinity, 9.5, 5.0 and 2.7 are applied. The methods are simple to implement and well-known from the literature. They are based on (1) a large VOI encompassing the whole sphere, without background activity and with volume information from other sources, (2) a small VOI located in the sphere center, and (3) a VOI consisting of voxels with voxel value above a certain percentage of the maximum voxel value. RESULTS The determined activity concentration varies significantly with sphere size, sphere-to-background ratio, SPECT reconstruction method and method for determining the concentration. Based on the phantom study, criteria are identified under which the activity concentration can be determined with a maximal error of 40% even in the presence of background activity. CONCLUSIONS Tumor dosimetry is feasible in the presence of background activity using the above-mentioned methods, provided appropriate SPECT reconstructions are applied and tumors are selected for dosimetry analysis according to the following criteria for the three methods: (1) solitary tumor with diameter > 15 mm, (2) tumor diameter > 30 mm and tumor-to-background ratio > 2, and (3) tumor diameter > 30 mm and tumor-to-background ratio > 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Frøhlich Staanum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Veerman CHAM, Siebinga H, de Vries-Huizing DMV, Tesselaar MET, Hendrikx JJMA, Stokkel MPM, Aalbersberg EA. The effect of long-acting somatostatin analogues on the uptake of [ 177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1434-1441. [PMID: 36598536 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06094-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to IAEA/EANM/SNMMI guidelines, long-acting somatostatin analogues (LA-SSAs) should be discontinued 4-6 weeks prior to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) to prevent somatostatin receptor saturation. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of continued use of long-acting SSAs during PRRT on the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE on SPECT/CT. METHODS Consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumours who were treated with PRRT receiving 7.4 GBq of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) control (LA-SSA stopped > 6 weeks prior to PRRT), or continued treatment with (2) long-acting octreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT, or (3) long-acting lanreotide < 6 weeks prior to PRRT. The uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was quantified in healthy tissues (spleen, liver, kidneys, bone marrow) and tumour lesions on SPECT/CT performed 24 h after PRRT. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine differences in uptake between the long-acting octreotide and long-acting lanreotide groups compared to the control group. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 135 cycles of PRRT were included: 28 with lanreotide, 50 with octreotide, and 57 cycles without LA-SSAs. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE was significantly decreased in liver parenchyma in patients with lanreotide (p < 0.001) and in the spleen in patients with either octreotide or lanreotide (both p < 0.001). No differences were observed for uptake in kidneys, bone marrow, and blood pool. Uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumours was the same in patients with lanreotide compared to the control (p = 0.862) and in patients with octreotide compared to the control (p = 0.201), independent of tumour location. CONCLUSION Long-acting octreotide and lanreotide do not interfere with the uptake of [177Lu]Lu-HA-DOTATATE in tumour lesions 24 h post-injection. Uptake in healthy liver parenchyma significantly decreases after lanreotide administration prior to PRRT, while uptake in healthy spleen tissue significantly decreases with both octreotide and lanreotide administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chayenne H A M Veerman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hinke Siebinga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne M V de Vries-Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical and Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen J M A Hendrikx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piwowarska-Bilska H, Kurkowska S, Birkenfeld B. Individualization of Radionuclide Therapies: Challenges and Prospects. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14143418. [PMID: 35884478 PMCID: PMC9316481 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Currently, patient-specific treatment plans and dosimetry calculations are not routinely performed for radionuclide therapies. In external beam radiotherapy, it is quite the opposite. As a result, a small fraction of patients receives optimal radioactivity. This conservative approach provides “radiation safety” to healthy tissues but delivers a lower than indicated absorbed dose to the tumors, resulting in a lower response rate and a higher disease relapse rate. Evidence shows that better and more predictable outcomes can be achieved with patient-individualized dose assessment. Therefore, the incorporation of individual planning into radionuclide therapies is a high priority for nuclear medicine physicians and medical physicists alike. Internal dosimetry is used in tumor therapy to optimize the absorbed dose to the target tissue. The main reasons for the difficulties in incorporating patients’ internal dosimetry into routine clinical practice are discussed. The article presents the prospects for the routine implementation of personalized radionuclide therapies. Abstract The article presents the problems of clinical implementation of personalized radioisotope therapy. The use of radioactive drugs in the treatment of malignant and benign diseases is rapidly expanding. Currently, in the majority of nuclear medicine departments worldwide, patients receive standard activities of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Intensively conducted clinical trials constantly provide more evidence of a close relationship between the dose of radiopharmaceutical absorbed in pathological tissues and the therapeutic effect of radioisotope therapy. Due to the lack of individual internal dosimetry (based on the quantitative analysis of a series of diagnostic images) before or during the treatment, only a small fraction of patients receives optimal radioactivity. The vast majority of patients receive too-low doses of ionizing radiation to the target tissues. This conservative approach provides “radiation safety” to healthy tissues, but also delivers lower radiopharmaceutical activity to the neoplastic tissue, resulting in a low level of response and a higher relapse rate. The article presents information on the currently used radionuclides in individual radioisotope therapies and on radionuclides newly introduced to the therapeutic market. It discusses the causes of difficulties with the implementation of individualized radioisotope therapies as well as possible changes in the current clinical situation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Experimental Therapy of HER2-Expressing Xenografts Using the Second-Generation HER2-Targeting Affibody Molecule 188Re-ZHER2:41071. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14051092. [PMID: 35631678 PMCID: PMC9146794 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
HER2-targeted radionuclide therapy might be helpful for the treatment of breast, gastric, and ovarian cancers which have developed resistance to antibody and antibody-drug conjugate-based therapies despite preserved high HER2-expression. Affibody molecules are small targeting proteins based on a non-immunoglobulin scaffold. The goal of this study was to test in an animal model a hypothesis that the second-generation HER2-targeting Affibody molecule 188Re-ZHER2:41071 might be useful for treatment of HER2-expressing malignant tumors. ZHER2:41071 was efficiently labeled with a beta-emitting radionuclide rhenium-188 (188Re). 188Re-ZHER2:41071 demonstrated preserved specificity and high affinity (KD = 5 ± 3 pM) of binding to HER2-expressing cells. In vivo studies demonstrated rapid washout of 188Re from kidneys. The uptake in HER2-expressing SKOV-3 xenografts was HER2-specific and significantly exceeded the renal uptake 4 h after injection and later. The median survival of mice, which were treated by three injections of 16 MBq 188Re-ZHER2:41071 was 68 days, which was significantly longer (<0.0001 in the log-rank Mantel-Cox test) than survival of mice in the control groups treated with vehicle (29 days) or unlabeled ZHER2:41071 (27.5 days). In conclusion, the experimental radionuclide therapy using 188Re-ZHER2:41071 enabled enhancement of survival of mice with human tumors without toxicity to the kidneys, which is the critical organ.
Collapse
|
7
|
EANM dosimetry committee recommendations for dosimetry of 177Lu-labelled somatostatin-receptor- and PSMA-targeting ligands. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:1778-1809. [PMID: 35284969 PMCID: PMC9015994 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05727-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of the EANM Dosimetry Committee is to provide recommendations and guidance to scientists and clinicians on patient-specific dosimetry. Radiopharmaceuticals labelled with lutetium-177 (177Lu) are increasingly used for therapeutic applications, in particular for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours using ligands for somatostatin receptors and prostate adenocarcinoma with small-molecule PSMA-targeting ligands. This paper provides an overview of reported dosimetry data for these therapies and summarises current knowledge about radiation-induced side effects on normal tissues and dose-effect relationships for tumours. Dosimetry methods and data are summarised for kidneys, bone marrow, salivary glands, lacrimal glands, pituitary glands, tumours, and the skin in case of radiopharmaceutical extravasation. Where applicable, taking into account the present status of the field and recent evidence in the literature, guidance is provided. The purpose of these recommendations is to encourage the practice of patient-specific dosimetry in therapy with 177Lu-labelled compounds. The proposed methods should be within the scope of centres offering therapy with 177Lu-labelled ligands for somatostatin receptors or small-molecule PSMA.
Collapse
|
8
|
Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030761. [PMID: 35159027 PMCID: PMC8833798 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.
Collapse
|
9
|
Signore A, Prosperi D, Gentiloni G, Di Girolamo M, Lauri C, Filice A, Panzuto F. Therapy of NET with radiolabeled SST analogs. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00155-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
10
|
Staanum PF, Frellsen AF, Olesen ML, Iversen P, Arveschoug AK. Practical kidney dosimetry in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE with focus on uncertainty estimates. EJNMMI Phys 2021; 8:78. [PMID: 34773508 PMCID: PMC8590641 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-021-00422-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney dosimetry after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using 177Lu-labelled somatostatin analogues is a procedure with multiple steps. We present the SPECT/CT-based implementation at Aarhus University Hospital and evaluate the uncertainty of the various steps in order to estimate the total uncertainty and to identify the major sources of uncertainty. Absorbed dose data from 115 treatment fractions are reported.
Results The total absorbed dose with uncertainty is presented for 59 treatments with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and 56 treatments with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. For [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC the mean and median specific absorbed dose (dose per injected activity) is 0.37 Gy/GBq and 0.38 Gy/GBq, respectively, while for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE the median and mean are 0.47 Gy/GBq and 0.46 Gy/GBq, respectively. The uncertainty of the procedure is estimated to be about 13% for a single treatment fraction, where the absorbed dose calculation is based on three SPECT/CT scans 1, 4 and 7 days post-injection, while it increases to about 19% if only a single SPECT/CT scan is performed 1 day post-injection. Conclusions The specific absorbed dose values obtained with the described procedure are comparable to those from other treatment sites for both [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, but towards the lower end of the range of reported values. The estimated uncertainty is also comparable to that from other reports and judged acceptable for clinical and research use, thus proving the kidney dosimetry procedure a useful tool. The greatest reduction in uncertainty can be obtained by improved activity determination, partial volume correction and additional SPECT/CT scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Frøhlich Staanum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Anders Floor Frellsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise Olesen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Peter Iversen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Anne Kirstine Arveschoug
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kovan B, Özkan ZG, Demir B, Tunçman D, Işik EG, Şimşek DH, Büyükkaya F, Türkmen C, Şanli Y. An Analysis for Therapeutic Doses of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumor Treated with Lutetium-177-DOTATATE. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2021; 37:17-22. [PMID: 34134512 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2021.0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to clarify the critical organs that limit treatment scheme and also evaluate the validity of currently used critical organ threshold values in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients, receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE. Thirty-six NET patients (ages 16-73 years) who received 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment were evaluated retrospectively in this study. Dosimetric calculations were made using medical internal radionuclide dose method. For calculation of organ doses, Internal Dose Assessment at Organ Level/Exponential Modelling 1.1 software program was used. Follow-up data were used to determine the organ failure. Results: A total of 141 cycles and mean of 3.91 (±1.33) cycles were applied to the patients. A mean of 691 mCi (±257 mCi) 177Lu-DOTATATE infusion in total and a dose between 70 and 200 mCi per treatment was applied to patients. Seven of 36 patients reached 23 Gy renal dose limit. In these patients, although kidney doses were between 23 and 29 Gy, there was no diminution in renal functions during follow-up. Two of 36 patients reached total bone marrow dose of 2 Gy limit. Bone marrow suppression did not develop in these patients. Conclusion: The critical organs that seem to affect the treatment scheme in PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE are kidney and bone marrow. Although there are established threshold levels, derived from radiotherapy experience, more studies are needed to clarify these dose limits in systemic radionuclide therapies such as PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilal Kovan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gözde Özkan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bayram Demir
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Duygu Tunçman
- Department of Physics, Science Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Emine Göknur Işik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Duygu Has Şimşek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fikret Büyükkaya
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cüneyt Türkmen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasemin Şanli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haider M, Das S, Al-Toubah T, Pelle E, El-Haddad G, Strosberg J. Somatostatin receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 2021; 28:R81-R93. [PMID: 33608483 PMCID: PMC8118168 DOI: 10.1530/erc-20-0360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using 177Lu-DOTATATE has been approved for the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic NETs. An understanding of benefits and risks is important for the appropriate implementation of this therapy. This review summarizes study data supporting the use of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs for the treatment of advanced NETs and highlights risks, including potential toxicities in specific populations. Key ongoing clinical trials, including randomized studies, are designed to better define the position of PRRT within the broader therapeutic landscape. Preclinical and early-phase human studies are focused on the development of novel somatostatin-receptor agonists and antagonists, new radionuclides, and radiosensitizing combination therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mintallah Haider
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of GI Oncology, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Satya Das
- Department of GI Oncology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Eleonora Pelle
- Department of Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Puglia, Italy
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sandström M, Freedman N, Fröss-Baron K, Kahn T, Sundin A. Kidney dosimetry in 777 patients during 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy: aspects on extrapolations and measurement time points. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:73. [PMID: 33296054 PMCID: PMC7726073 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00339-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Fractionated peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE is increasingly applied as an effective treatment for patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors. In parallel to dose planning before external beam radiation therapy, dosimetry is also needed to optimize PRRT to the individual patient. Accordingly, absorbed doses to organs at risk need to be calculated during PRRT, based on serial measurements of radioactivity distribution utilizing SPECT/CT. The dosimetry should be based on as few measurements as possible, while still retaining reliable results. The main aim of the present work was to calculate the fractional contribution of the extrapolations of the curve fits for the absorbed dose calculations to the kidneys. The secondary aim was to study agreement between absorbed dose (AD) and the effective half-life (teff) for the kidneys, estimated by means of measurements at one or two time points, in comparison to our current method employing three time points. Methods In 777 patients with disseminated neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, SPECT/CT over the abdomen was acquired at 1, 4, and 7 days after 177Lu-DOTATATE infusion. The absorbed dose to the kidneys was calculated from SPECT/CT radioactivity distribution data, and the teff and fractional contributions of the extrapolations were estimated, utilizing data from one, two, and three time points, respectively. Results The fractional contributions from extrapolations before day 1 measurement and after day 7 measurement were approximately 26% and 11%, respectively. The mean differences in absorbed dose, based on one, two, and three time points were small, but with high method dependence for individual patients. The differences in estimated teff were small when it was based on measurements at days 1 and 7, but high for days 1 and 4 time points. Conclusion When assessing simplifications of methods for calculation of the absorbed dose to the kidneys, it was of the uttermost importance to incorporate the fractional contribution for the extrapolations included in the reference method. Measurements at an early and a late time point were found most important. An intermediate measurement contributes with an idea of the goodness of the fit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Sandström
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. .,Section of Medical Physics, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Nanette Freedman
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Katarzyna Fröss-Baron
- Division of Endocrine Oncology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Tanweera Kahn
- Section of Oncology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Sundin
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Finocchiaro D, Gear JI, Fioroni F, Flux GD, Murray I, Castellani G, Versari A, Iori M, Grassi E. Uncertainty analysis of tumour absorbed dose calculations in molecular radiotherapy. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:63. [PMID: 33044651 PMCID: PMC7550507 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00328-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internal dosimetry evaluation consists of a multi-step process ranging from imaging acquisition to absorbed dose calculations. Assessment of uncertainty is complicated and, for that reason, it is commonly ignored in clinical routine. However, it is essential for adequate interpretation of the results. Recently, the EANM published a practical guidance on uncertainty analysis for molecular radiotherapy based on the application of the law of propagation of uncertainty. In this study, we investigated the overall uncertainty on a sample of a patient following the EANM guidelines. The aim of this study was to provide an indication of the typical uncertainties that may be expected from performing dosimetry, to determine parameters that have the greatest effect on the accuracy of calculations and to consider the potential improvements that could be made if these effects were reduced. RESULTS Absorbed doses and the relative uncertainties were calculated for a sample of 49 patients and a total of 154 tumours. A wide range of relative absorbed dose uncertainty values was observed (14-102%). Uncertainties associated with each quantity along the absorbed dose calculation chain (i.e. volume, recovery coefficient, calibration factor, activity, time-activity curve fitting, time-integrated activity and absorbed dose) were estimated. An equation was derived to describe the relationship between the uncertainty in the absorbed dose and the volume. The largest source of error was the VOI delineation. By postulating different values of FWHM, the impact of the imaging system spatial resolution on the uncertainties was investigated. DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of uncertainty in molecular radiotherapy based on a cohort of clinical cases. Wide inter-lesion variability of absorbed dose uncertainty was observed. Hence, a proper assessment of the uncertainties associated with the calculations should be considered as a basic scientific standard. A model for a quick estimate of uncertainty without implementing the entire error propagation schema, which may be useful in clinical practice, was presented. Ameliorating spatial resolution may be in future the key factor for accurate absorbed dose assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Finocchiaro
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jonathan I Gear
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Federica Fioroni
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Glenn D Flux
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Iain Murray
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Gastone Castellani
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mauro Iori
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elisa Grassi
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mora-Ramirez E, Santoro L, Cassol E, Ocampo-Ramos JC, Clayton N, Kayal G, Chouaf S, Trauchessec D, Pouget JP, Kotzki PO, Deshayes E, Bardiès M. Comparison of commercial dosimetric software platforms in patients treated with 177 Lu-DOTATATE for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:4602-4615. [PMID: 32632928 PMCID: PMC7589428 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare five commercial dosimetric software platforms based on the analysis of clinical datasets of patients who benefited from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu‐DOTATATE (LUTATHERA®). Methods The dosimetric analysis was performed on two patients during two cycles of PRRT with 177Lu. Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images were acquired at 4, 24, 72, and 192 h post injection. Reconstructed images were generated using Dosimetry Toolkit® (DTK) from Xeleris™ and HybridRecon‐Oncology version_1.3_Dicom (HROD) from HERMES. Reconstructed images using DTK were analyzed using the same software to calculate time‐integrated activity coefficients (TIAC), and mean absorbed doses were estimated using OLINDA/EXM V1.0 with mass correction. Reconstructed images from HROD were uploaded into PLANET® OncoDose from DOSIsoft, STRATOS from Phillips, Hybrid Dosimetry Module™ from HERMES, and SurePlan™ MRT from MIM. Organ masses, TIACs, and mean absorbed doses were calculated from each application using their recommendations. Results The majority of organ mass estimates varied by <9.5% between all platforms. The highest variability for TIAC results between platforms was seen for the kidneys (28.2%) for the two patients and the two treatment cycles. Relative standard deviations in mean absorbed doses were slightly higher compared with those observed for TIAC, but remained of the same order of magnitude between all platforms. Conclusions When applying a similar processing approach, results obtained were of the same order of magnitude regardless of the platforms used. However, the comparison of the performances of currently available platforms is still difficult as they do not all address the same parts of the dosimetric analysis workflow. In addition, the way in which data are handled in each part of the chain from data acquisition to absorbed doses may be different, which complicates the comparison exercise. Therefore, the dissemination of commercial solutions for absorbed dose calculation calls for the development of tools and standards allowing for the comparison of the performances between dosimetric software platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erick Mora-Ramirez
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France.,Escuela de Física - CICANUM, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, 11501-2060, Costa Rica
| | - Lore Santoro
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Emmanuelle Cassol
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France.,Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpitaux Toulouse, Toulouse, F-31059, France.,Faculté de Médecine Rangueil, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France
| | - Juan C Ocampo-Ramos
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France
| | - Naomi Clayton
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France
| | - Gunjan Kayal
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France.,SCK CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Boeretang 200, Mol, BE-2400, Belgium
| | - Soufiane Chouaf
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Dorian Trauchessec
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pouget
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Pierre-Olivier Kotzki
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France.,Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Département de Médecine Nucléaire, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, F-34298, France.,Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Inserm U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, F-34298, France
| | - Manuel Bardiès
- Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Toulouse, F-31037, France.,INSERM, UMR 1037, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, F-31062, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Freedman N, Sandström M, Kuten J, Shtraus N, Ospovat I, Schlocker A, Even-Sapir E. Personalized radiation dosimetry for PRRT-how many scans are really required? EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:26. [PMID: 32394075 PMCID: PMC7214583 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-00293-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Over recent years, peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) has been recognized as an effective treatment for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Personalized dosimetry can contribute to improve the outcome of peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) in patients with metastatic NETs. Dosimetry can aid treatment planning, ensuring that absorbed dose to vulnerable normal organs (kidneys and bone marrow) does not exceed safe limits over serial treatments, and that absorbed dose to tumor is sufficient. Absorbed dose is estimated from a series of post-treatment SPECT/CT images. Total self-dose is proportional to the integral under the time activity concentration curve (TACC). Method dependence of image-based absorbed dose calculations has been previously investigated, and we set out here to extend previous work by examining implications of number of data points in the TACC and the numerical integration methods used in estimating absorbed dose. Methods In this retrospective study, absorbed dose estimates and effective half-lives were calculated by fitting curves to TACCs for normal organs and tumors in 30 consecutive patients who underwent a series of 4 post-treatment SPECT/CT scans at 4 h, 24 h, 4–5 days, and 1 week following 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT. We examined the effects of including only 2 or 3 rather than all 4 data points in the TACC, and the effect of numerical integration method (mono-exponential alone or in combination with trapezoidal rule) on the absorbed dose and half-life estimates. Our current method is the combination of trapezoidal rule over the first 24 h, with mono-exponential fit thereafter extrapolated to infinity. The other methods were compared to this current method. Results Differences in absorbed dose and effective half-life between the current method and estimates based only on the second, third, and fourth scans were very small (mean differences < 2.5%), whereas differences between the current method and 4-point mono-exponential fit were higher (mean differences < 5%) with a larger range. It appears that in a 4-point mono-exponential fit the early (4 h) time point may skew results, causing some large errors. Differences between the current method and values based on only 2 time points were relatively small (mean differences < 3.5%) when the 24 h and 1 week scans were used, but when the 24 h and 4–5 days scans, or the 4–5 days and 1 week scans were used, differences were greater. Conclusion This study indicates that for 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT, accurate estimates of absorbed dose for organs and tumors may be estimated from scans at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 week post-treatment without an earlier scan. It may even be possible to cut out the 72 h scan, though the uncertainty increases. However, further work on more patients is required to validate this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanette Freedman
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Mattias Sandström
- Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jonathan Kuten
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Natan Shtraus
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Inna Ospovat
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Albert Schlocker
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Even-Sapir
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman Street, 64239, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chicheportiche A, Ben-Haim S, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Oleinikov K, Meirovitz A, Gross DJ, Godefroy J. Dosimetry after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: impact of reduced number of post-treatment studies on absorbed dose calculation and on patient management. EJNMMI Phys 2020; 7:5. [PMID: 31975156 PMCID: PMC6977807 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-020-0273-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background After each cycle of [177Lu]-DOTA-TATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) dosimetry is performed to enable precise calculation of the radiation-absorbed dose to tumors and normal organs. Absorbed doses are routinely calculated from three quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies corrected by computed tomography (CT) acquired at t1 = 24 h, t2 = 96 h, and t3 = 168 h after the first cycle of treatment. After following cycles, a single SPECT/CT study is performed. The aim of the present study is to assess the feasibility of a “two time point” quantitative SPECT/CT protocol after the first PRRT cycle and its impact on patient management. Quantitative SPECT/CT data of 25 consecutive patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors after PRRT were retrospectively analyzed. Radiation-absorbed doses calculated using the standard protocol with three SPECT/CT studies acquired at (t1, t2, t3) were compared to those obtained from three different “two time point” protocols with SPECT/CT studies performed at (t1, t2), (t1, t3), or (t2, t3). Results The best agreement for the cumulative doses absorbed by the kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors with the conventional protocol was obtained with the (t1, t3) protocol with mean relative differences of − 1.0% ± 2.4%, 0.4% ± 3.1%, − 0.9% ± 4.0%, − 0.8% ± 1.1%, and − 0.5% ± 2.0%, respectively, and correlation coefficients of r = 0.99 for all. In all patients, there was no difference in the management decision of whether or not to stop PRRT because of unsafe absorbed dose to risk organs using either the standard protocol or the (t1, t3) protocol. Conclusion These preliminary results demonstrate that dosimetry calculations using two quantitative SPECT/CT studies acquired at 24 and 168 h after the first PRRT cycle are feasible and are in good agreement with the standard imaging protocol with no change in patient management decisions, while enabling improved patient comfort and reduced scanner and staff time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Chicheportiche
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Biophysics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Simona Ben-Haim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Biophysics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.,Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kira Oleinikov
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amichay Meirovitz
- Oncology Department and Radiation Therapy Unit, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David J Gross
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jeremy Godefroy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Biophysics, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Taprogge J, Leek F, Flux GD. Physics aspects of setting up a multicenter clinical trial involving internal dosimetry of radioiodine treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2019; 63:271-277. [PMID: 31315346 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.19.03202-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024]
Abstract
The field of molecular radiotherapy is expanding rapidly, with the advent of many new radiotherapeutics for the treatment of common as well as for rare cancers. Treatment outcome is dependent on the absorbed doses delivered to target volumes and to healthy organs-at-risk, which are shown to vary widely from fixed administrations of activity. There have been significant developments in quantitative imaging and internal dosimetry in recent years, although clinical implementation of these methods has been slow in comparison with external beam radiotherapy, partly due to there being relatively few patients treated at single centers. Multicenter clinical trials are therefore essential to acquire the data required to ensure best practice and to develop the personalized treatment planning that this area is well suited to, due to the unrivalled opportunity to image the therapeutic drug in vivo. Initial preparation for such trials requires a significant effort in terms of resources and trial design. Imaging systems in participating centers must be characterized and set up for quantitative imaging to allow for collation of data. Data transfer for centralized processing is usually necessary but is hindered in some cases by data protection regulations and local logistics. Recent multicenter clinical trials involving radioiodine therapy have begun to establish the procedures necessary for quantitative SPECT imaging in a multicenter setting using standard and anthropomorphic phantoms. The establishment of national and international multicenter imaging and dosimetry networks will provide frameworks to develop and harmonize best practice with existing therapeutic procedures and to ensure rapid and optimized clinical implementation of new radiotherapeutics across all centers of excellence that offer molecular radiotherapy. This will promote networks and collaborations that can provide a sound basis for further developments and will ensure that nuclear medicine maintains a key role in future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Taprogge
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK -
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK -
| | - Francesca Leek
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Glenn D Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Del Prete M, Buteau FA, Arsenault F, Saighi N, Bouchard LO, Beaulieu A, Beauregard JM. Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: initial results from the P-PRRT trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:728-742. [PMID: 30506283 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is mostly administered using a fixed injected activity (IA) per cycle. This empiric regime results in highly variable absorbed doses to the critical organs and undertreatment of the majority of patients. We conceived a personalized PRRT protocol in which the IA is adjusted to deliver a prescribed absorbed dose to the kidney, with the aim to safely increase tumour irradiation. We herein report on the initial results of our prospective study of personalized PRRT, the P-PRRT Trial (NCT02754297). METHODS PRRT-naïve patients with progressive and/or symptomatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) were scheduled to receive a four-cycle induction course of 177Lu-octreotate with quantitative SPECT/CT-based dosimetry. The IA was personalized according to the glomerular filtration rate and the body surface area for the first cycle, and according to the prior renal Gy/GBq for the subsequent cycles. The prescribed renal absorbed dose of 23 Gy was reduced by 25-50% in case of significant renal or haematological impairment. Responders were allowed to receive consolidation or maintenance cycles, for each of which 6 Gy to the kidney were prescribed. We simulated the empiric PRRT regime by fixing the IA at 7.4 GBq per cycle, with the same percentage reductions as above. Radiological, molecular imaging, biochemical, and quality of life responses, as well as safety, were assessed. RESULTS Fifty-two patients underwent 171 cycles. In 34 patients who completed the induction course, a median cumulative IA of 36.1 (range, 6.3-78.6) GBq was administered, and the median cumulative kidney and maximum tumour absorbed doses were 22.1 (range, 8.3-24.3) Gy and 185.7 (range: 15.2-443.1) Gy respectively. Compared with the simulated fixed-IA induction regime, there was a median 1.26-fold increase (range, 0.47-2.12 fold) in the cumulative maximum tumour absorbed dose, which was higher in 85.3% of patients. In 39 assessable patients, the best objective response was partial response in nine (23.1%), minor response in 14 (35.9%), stable disease in 13 (33.3%) and progressive disease in three patients (7.7%). In particular, 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) with pancreatic NET had partial or minor response. The global health status/quality of life score significantly increased in 50% of patients. Acute and subacute side-effects were all of grade 1 or 2, and the most common were nausea (in 32.7% of patients) and fatigue (in 30.8% of patients) respectively. Subacute grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in less than 10% of patients, with the exception of lymphocytopenia in 51.9% of patients, without any clinical consequences however. No patient experienced severe renal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Personalized PRRT makes it possible to safely increase tumour irradiation in the majority of patients. Our first results indicate a favourable tolerance profile, which appears similar to that of the empiric regime. The response rates are promising, in particular in patients with NET of pancreatic origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Del Prete
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada.,Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Oncology Branch, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada
| | - François-Alexandre Buteau
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Frédéric Arsenault
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada.,Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Oncology Branch, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Nassim Saighi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada.,Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Oncology Branch, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Louis-Olivier Bouchard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Radiology, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Alexis Beaulieu
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Jean-Mathieu Beauregard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada. .,Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Imaging, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, G1R 2J6, Canada. .,Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada. .,Oncology Branch, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marin G, Vanderlinden B, Karfis I, Guiot T, Wimana Z, Reynaert N, Vandenberghe S, Flamen P. A dosimetry procedure for organs-at-risk in 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Phys Med 2018; 56:41-49. [PMID: 30527088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE has become a standard treatment modality in neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). No consensus has yet been reached however regarding the absorbed dose threshold for lesion response, the absorbed dose limit to organs-at-risk, and the optimal fractionation and activity to be administered. This is partly due to a lack of uniform and comparable dosimetry protocols. The present article details the development of an organ-at-risk dosimetry procedure, which could be implemented and used routinely in a clinical context. METHODS Forty-seven patients with NETs underwent 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Three SPECT/CT images were acquired at 4, 24 and 144-192 h post-injection. Three blood samples were obtained together with the SPECT/CT acquisitions and 2 additional samples were obtained around 30 min and 1 h post-injection. A bi-exponential fit was used to compute the source organ time-integrated activity coefficients. Coefficients were introduced into OLINDA/EXM software to compute organ-at-risk absorbed doses. Median values for all patients were computed for absorbed dose coefficient D/A0 and for late effective half-life T1/2eff for kidneys, spleen and red marrow. RESULTS Dosimetry resulted in a median[interquartile range] of 0.78[0.35], 1.07[0.58] and 0.028[0.010] Gy/GBq for D/A0 and of 55[9], 71[9] and 52[18] h for T1/2eff for kidneys, spleen and red marrow respectively. CONCLUSIONS A dosimetry procedure for organs-at-risk in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy based on serial SPECT/CT images and blood samples can be implemented routinely in a clinical context with limited patient burden. The results obtained were in accordance with those of other centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwennaëlle Marin
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium; Medical Imaging and Signal Processing (MEDISIP), Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS), Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (FEA), Ghent University (UGent), 185 De Pintelaan, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - Bruno Vanderlinden
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Ioannis Karfis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Thomas Guiot
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Zena Wimana
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Nick Reynaert
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Stefaan Vandenberghe
- Medical Imaging and Signal Processing (MEDISIP), Department of Electronics and Information Systems (ELIS), Faculty of Engineering and Architecture (FEA), Ghent University (UGent), 185 De Pintelaan, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Flamen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet-Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 121 boulevard de Waterloo, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Radiometals possess an exceptional breadth of decay properties and have been applied to medicine with great success for several decades. The majority of current clinical use involves diagnostic procedures, which use either positron-emission tomography (PET) or single-photon imaging to detect anatomic abnormalities that are difficult to visualize using conventional imaging techniques (e.g., MRI and X-ray). The potential of therapeutic radiometals has more recently been realized and relies on ionizing radiation to induce irreversible DNA damage, resulting in cell death. In both cases, radiopharmaceutical development has been largely geared toward the field of oncology; thus, selective tumor targeting is often essential for efficacious drug use. To this end, the rational design of four-component radiopharmaceuticals has become popularized. This Review introduces fundamental concepts of drug design and applications, with particular emphasis on bifunctional chelators (BFCs), which ensure secure consolidation of the radiometal and targeting vector and are integral for optimal drug performance. Also presented are detailed accounts of production, chelation chemistry, and biological use of selected main group and rare earth radiometals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas I Kostelnik
- Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia V6T 1Z1 , Canada
| | - Chris Orvig
- Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry Group, Department of Chemistry , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia V6T 1Z1 , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Del Prete M, Arsenault F, Saighi N, Zhao W, Buteau FA, Celler A, Beauregard JM. Accuracy and reproducibility of simplified QSPECT dosimetry for personalized 177Lu-octreotate PRRT. EJNMMI Phys 2018; 5:25. [PMID: 30318563 PMCID: PMC6186532 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-018-0224-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Routine dosimetry is essential for personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), but practical and robust dosimetry methods are needed for wide clinical adoption. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and inter-observer reproducibility of simplified dosimetry protocols based on quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (QSPECT) with a limited number of scanning time points. We also updated our personalized injected activity (IA) prescription scheme. Methods Seventy-nine NET patients receiving 177Lu-octreotate therapy (with a total of 279 therapy cycles) were included in our study. Three-time-point (3TP; days 0, 1, and 3) QSPECT scanning was performed following each therapy administration. Dosimetry was obtained using small volumes of interest activity concentration sampling for the kidney, the bone marrow and the tumor having the most intense uptake. Accuracy of the simplified dosimetry based on two-time-point (2TP; days 1 and 3, monoexponential fit) or a single-time-point (1TPD3; day 3) scanning was assessed, as well as that of hybrid methods based on 2TP for the first cycle and 1TP (day 1 or 3; 2TP/1TPD1 and 2TP/1TPD3, respectively) or no imaging at all (based on IA only; 2TP/no imaging (NI)) for the subsequent induction cycles. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated for the 3TP, 2TP, and hybrid 2TP/1TPD3 methods using a subset of 60 induction cycles (15 patients). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body size descriptors (weight, body surface area (BSA), lean body weight (LBW)), and products of both were assessed for their ability to predict IA per renal absorbed dose at the first cycle. Results The 2TP dosimetry estimates correlated highly with those from the 3TP data for all tissues (Spearman r > 0.99, P < 0.0001) with small relative errors between the methods, particularly for the kidney and the tumor, with median relative errors not exceeding 2% and interdecile ranges spanning over less than 6% and 4%, respectively, for the per-cycle and cumulative estimates. For the bone marrow, the errors were slightly greater (median errors < 6%, interdecile ranges < 14%). Overall, the strength of correlations of the absorbed dose estimates from the simplified methods with those from the 3TP scans tended to progressively decrease, and the relative errors to increase, in the following order: 2TP, 2TP/1TPD3, 1TPD3, 2TP/1TPD1, and 2TP/NI. For the tumor, the 2TP/NI scenario was highly inaccurate due to the interference of the therapeutic response. There was an excellent inter-observer agreement between the three observers, in particular for the renal absorbed dose estimated using the 3TP and 2TP methods, with mean errors lesser than 1% and standard deviations of 5% or lower. The eGFR · LBW and eGFR · BSA products best predicted the ratio of IA to the renal dose (GBq/Gy) for the first cycle (Spearman r = 0.41 and 0.39, respectively; P < 0.001). For the first cycle, the personalized IA proportional to eGFR · LBW or eGFR · BSA decreased the range of delivered renal absorbed dose between patients as compared with the fixed IA. For the subsequent cycles, the optimal personalized IA could be determined based on the prior cycle renal GBq/Gy with an error of less than 21% in 90% of patients. Conclusions A simplified dosimetry protocol based on two-time-point QSPECT scanning on days 1 and 3 post-PRRT provides reproducible and more accurate dose estimates than the techniques relying on a single time point for non-initial or all cycles and results in limited patient inconvenience as compared to protocols involving scanning at later time points. Renal absorbed dose over the 4-cycle induction PRRT course can be standardized by personalizing IA based on the product of eGFR with LBW or BSA for the first cycle and on prior renal dosimetry for the subsequent cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Del Prete
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging and Oncology Branch of CHU de Québec Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Frédéric Arsenault
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging and Oncology Branch of CHU de Québec Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Nassim Saighi
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging and Oncology Branch of CHU de Québec Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Wei Zhao
- Medical Imaging Research Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - François-Alexandre Buteau
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.,Department of Medical Imaging and Oncology Branch of CHU de Québec Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada
| | - Anna Celler
- Medical Imaging Research Group, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jean-Mathieu Beauregard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada. .,Department of Medical Imaging and Oncology Branch of CHU de Québec Research Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 11 côte du Palais, Quebec City, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Huizing DMV, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Verheij M, Stokkel MPM. Dosimetry methods and clinical applications in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: a literature review. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:89. [PMID: 30159614 PMCID: PMC6115319 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0443-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The main challenge for systemic radiation therapy using radiopharmaceuticals (SRT) is to optimise the dose delivered to the tumour, while minimising normal tissue irradiation. Dosimetry could help to increase therapy response and decrease toxicity after SRT by individual treatment planning. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an accepted SRT treatment option for irresectable and metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, dosimetry in PRRT is not routinely performed, mainly due to the lack of evidence in literature and clinical implementation difficulties. The goal of this review is to provide insight in dosimetry methods and requirements and to present an overview of clinical aspects of dosimetry in PRRT for NET. Methods A PubMed query including the search criteria dosimetry, radiation dose, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and radionuclide therapy was performed. Articles were selected based on title and abstract, and description of dosimetric approach. Results A total of 288 original articles were included. The most important dosimetry methods, their main advantages and limitations, and implications in the clinical setting are discussed. An overview of dosimetry in clinical studies regarding PRRT treatment for NET is provided. Conclusion Clinical dosimetry in PRRT is feasible and can result in improved treatment outcomes. Current clinical dosimetry studies focus on safety and apply non-voxel-based dosimetry methods. Personalised treatment using sophisticated dosimetry methods to assess tumour and normal tissue uptake in clinical trials is the next step towards routine dosimetry in PRRT for NET. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0443-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Merel Valerie Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Determination of gamma camera calibration factors for quantitation of therapeutic radioisotopes. EJNMMI Phys 2018; 5:8. [PMID: 29717385 PMCID: PMC5930296 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-018-0208-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Camera calibration, which translates reconstructed count map into absolute activity map, is a prerequisite procedure for quantitative SPECT imaging. Both planar and tomographic scans using different phantom geometries have been proposed for the determination of the camera calibration factor (CF). However, there is no consensus on which approach is the best. The aim of this study is to evaluate all these calibration methods, compare their performance, and propose a practical and accurate calibration method for SPECT quantitation of therapeutic radioisotopes. Twenty-one phantom experiments (Siemens Symbia SPECT/CT) and 12 Monte Carlo simulations (GATE v6.1) using three therapy isotopes (131I, 177Lu, and 188Re) have been performed. The following phantom geometries were used: (1) planar scans of point source in air (PS), (2) tomographic scans of insert(s) filled with activity placed in non-radioactive water (HS + CB), (3) tomographic scans of hot insert(s) in radioactive water (HS + WB), and (4) tomographic scans of cylinders uniformly filled with activity (HC). Tomographic data were reconstructed using OSEM with CT-based attenuation correction and triple energy window (TEW) scatter correction, and CF was determined using total counts in the reconstructed image, while for planar scans, the photopeak counts, corrected for scatter and background with TEW, were used. Additionally, for simulated data, CF obtained from primary photons only was analyzed. Results For phantom experiments, CF obtained from PS and HS + WB agreed to within 6% (below 3% if experiments performed on the same day are considered). However, CF from HS + CB exceeded those from PS by 4–12%. Similar trend was found in simulation studies. Analysis of CFs from primary photons helped us to understand this discrepancy. It was due to underestimation of scatter by the TEW method, further enhanced by attenuation correction. This effect becomes less important when the source is distributed over the entire phantom volume (HS + WB and HC). Conclusions Camera CF could be determined using planar scans of a point source, provided that the scatter and background contributions are removed, for example using the clinically available TEW method. This approach is simple and yet provides CF with sufficient accuracy (~ 5%) to be used in clinics for radiotracer quantification.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sandström M, Garske-Román U, Johansson S, Granberg D, Sundin A, Freedman N. Kidney dosimetry during 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: aspects on calculation and tolerance. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:516-521. [PMID: 28920501 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1378431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractionated therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE has been reported to be an effective treatment for patients with metastasized neuroendocrine tumors. To optimize the treatment, absorbed doses to risk organs are calculated for the individual patient. For each organ, absorbed dose due to activity in the organ itself (self-dose) and that originating from other organs (cross-dose) are calculated from serial measurements to obtain the activity distribution following treatment. The main aim of the present work were to calculate the cross-dose contribution to the total absorbed kidney dose. METHODS Five hundred patients with neuroendocrine tumors undergoing therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE were included. Scintigraphic planar whole body images and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over the abdomen were acquired at 1, 4 and 7 days after treatment. Kidney self-dose was calculated based on radioactivity distribution obtained from SPECT/CT. Cross-dose to kidneys was estimated using organ-based analysis of planar whole body images and cross-fire dose factors from Olinda/EXM 1.1. RESULTS Cross-dose to kidneys in the majority of patients were less than 2% and almost all cross-doses were less than 10%. Cross-dose exceeded 10% only in rare cases of patients with high tumor burden and low absorbed doses to kidneys. CONCLUSIONS The absorbed dose from 177Lu-octreotate to solid organs due to cross-fire is generally low and can usually be neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Sandström
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Section of Medical Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulrike Garske-Román
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Silvia Johansson
- Department of Immunology, Section of Oncology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dan Granberg
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Endocrine Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Sundin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Nanette Freedman
- Department of Medical Biophysics and Nuclear Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Imaging, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Personalized 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours: a simulation study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 44:1490-1500. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3688-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Gustafsson J, Sundlöv A, Sjögreen Gleisner K. SPECT image segmentation for estimation of tumour volume and activity concentration in 177Lu-DOTATATE radionuclide therapy. EJNMMI Res 2017; 7:18. [PMID: 28233160 PMCID: PMC5323339 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-017-0262-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dosimetry in radionuclide therapy has the potential to allow for a treatment tailored to the individual patient. One therapeutic radiopharmaceutical where patient-specific dosimetry is feasible is 177Lu-DOTATATE, used for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours. The emission of gamma photons by 177Lu allows for imaging with SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography). One important step for dosimetry using this imaging technique is the SPECT image segmentation, which needs to be robust and accurate for the estimated quantities to be reliable. This work investigates different methods for automatic tumour delineation in 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT images. Three segmentation methods are considered: a fixed 42% threshold (FT), the Otsu method (OM) and a method based on Fourier surfaces (FS). Effects of including resolution compensation in the iterative SPECT image reconstruction are also studied. Evaluation is performed based on Monte Carlo-simulated SPECT images from 24 h and 336 h post injection (p.i.), for determination of the volume, activity concentration and dice similarity coefficient. In addition, patient data are used to investigate the correspondence of tumour volumes when delineated in SPECT or morphological CT or MR images. Patient data are also used to examine the sensitivity to the operator-dependent initialization. Results For simulated images from 24 h p.i. reconstructed without resolution compensation, a volume and activity-concentration root-mean-square error below 15% is typically obtained for tumours above approximately 10 cm3 when using OM or FS, while FT performs considerably worse. When including resolution compensation, the tumour volume becomes underestimated and the activity concentration overestimated. The FS method appears to be robust to noise, as seen for the 336 h images. The differences between the tumour volumes estimated from the SPECT images and the volumes estimated from morphological images are generally larger than the discrepancies seen for the simulated data sets. Conclusions Segmentation results are encouraging for future dosimetry of tumours with volumes above approximately 10 cm3. Using resolution compensation in the reconstruction may have a negative effect on volume estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Gustafsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Anna Sundlöv
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|