Ethnic differences in patients' perceptions towards isolated orthopedic injuries: a pilot study

The role of perceived patient injustice on pain related and functional outcomes in orthopaedic patients; a systematic review

Introduction

Higher levels of perceived patient injustice has been associated with higher levels of pain and poor functional outcomes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. We wanted to investigate if there was any evidence of this association in patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery.

Materials and methods

A systematic search of the literature was performed independently by two researchers on the electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and data extracted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Outcomes of interest were pain, pain intensity, pain interference, opiate use, disability, physical function, return to work, quality of life, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, social functioning and quality of life.

Results

Five studies were identified for qualitative analysis involving elective and trauma orthopaedic patients. All studies identified a positive correlation between higher levels of perceived injustice and depression, pain intensity and interference as well as reduced function and higher levels of disability.

Conclusions

Higher levels of perceived patient injustice is associated with worse pain and functional outcomes in patients who undergo orthopaedic surgery in the traumatic and elective setting. Further research is warranted to further elucidate this association and identify potential therapeutic interventions.

Medicaid Payer Status Is a Predictor of Early Postoperative Pain Following Upper Extremity Procedures

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between insurance status and patient-reported pain both before and after upper extremity surgical procedures. We hypothesized that patients with Medicaid payer status would report higher levels of pre- and postoperative pain and report less postoperative pain relief. Methods: In all, 376 patients who underwent upper extremity procedures by a single surgeon at an academic ambulatory surgery center were identified. Patient information, including insurance status and Visual Analog Scale pain score (VAS-pain) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months, were collected. VAS-pain scores were compared with t-tests and linear regression. Results: Preoperatively and at 2-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up, Medicaid patients reported statistically significant higher pain levels than patients with Private insurance, finding a mean adjusted increase of 0.51 preoperatively, 0.39 at 1 month, and 0.79 at 3 months. Preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up, Medicaid patients reported statistically significant higher pain than patients with Medicare, finding increases in VAS-pain of 0.99 preoperatively and 0.94 at 3 months. There was no difference in pain improvement between any insurance types at any time point (all P values > .05). Conclusions: Patients with Medicaid report higher levels of preoperative pain and early postoperative pain, but reported the same improvement in pain as patients with other types of insurance. As healthcare systems are becoming increasingly dependent on patient-reported outcomes, including pain, it is important to consider that differences may exist in subjective pain depending on insurance status.

Socioeconomic Factors Influencing Self-reported Outcomes After Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum: Lessons Learned From a Hispanic Population

Introduction:

Demographic and socioeconomic factors are important determinants that may affect patient self-reported outcomes after acetabular fracture surgery. Hispanics, as a minority group, have an increased tendency to suffer demographic and socioeconomic disparities. At the present time, there is scant information regarding their role among Hispanic patients with acetabular fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether demographic or socioeconomic factors would affect satisfaction and self-reported functional outcomes in Hispanic patients who endured open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study of 78 patients with posterior wall fracture of the acetabulum treated with ORIF from 2011 to 2017 was performed. Data from demographics (age, sex, and body mass index [BMI]) and socioeconomic factors (household income, highest educational level achieved, employment status, type of medical insurance, workers' compensation involvement, and injury-related litigation process) were obtained and compared with the Short Musculoskeletal Form Assessment-46 (SMFA-46) questionnaire using a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results:

Unemployment was the most significant variable associated with dissatisfaction among 15 of the 46 responses of the SMFA-46 (P < 0.048). Patients who had an overweight or obese BMI and had an age of 41 years or older exhibited significantly worse outcomes in 7 of the 46 questions (P < 0.049). Finally, women were less likely to be satisfied in 1 of the 46 questions (P = 0.028). No notable difference was observed in any of the SMFA-46 responses regarding insurance plan, educational level, workers' compensation involvement, and injury-related litigation process.

Discussion:

A strong association exists between dissatisfaction after ORIF of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum and employment status, BMI, and age among the Hispanic population. Addressing socioeconomic factors can be critical to overcome dissatisfaction and improve functional status among Hispanic patients with acetabular fractures.