1
|
Clifford AM, Cheung PS, Malley NO, Byrne S, Whiston A, Kennelly B, Mphepo T, Eshghimanesh Z, Thabane L, Louw Q, Moss H, Gowran RJ, Neill DO, Glynn L, Woods CB, Maher C, Sheikhi A, Salsberg J, Bhriain ON. Findings from a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of a music and dance programme for community dwelling older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2024; 122:105371. [PMID: 38471410 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Functional decline, chronic illness, reduced quality of life and increased healthcare utilisation are common in older adults. Evidence suggests music and dance can support healthy ageing in older adults. This study explored the feasibility, potential for effect and cost effectiveness of the Music and Movement for Health (MMH) programme among community-dwelling older adults using a pragmatic cluster-randomised, controlled feasibility trial design. METHODS Community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older were recruited to seven clusters in the Mid-West region of Ireland. Clusters were block randomised to either the MMH intervention or control. Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, adherence, fidelity, and safety. Secondary outcomes measured physical activity, physical and cognitive performance, and psychosocial well-being, along with healthcare utilisation were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks. RESULTS The study successfully met feasibility targets, with recruitment (n = 100), retention (91 %), adherence (71 %), data completeness (92 %) and intervention fidelity (21 out of 24) all meeting predetermined criteria. Both groups exhibited an increase in self-reported physical activity and improved physical function. Participants in the intervention group scored consistently better in psychosocial measures compared to the control group at follow-up. The health economic analysis confirmed the feasibility of the methodology employed and points to the potential cost-effectiveness of the MMH relative to the control or no organised programme. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS The MMH intervention and study design were found to be feasible and acceptable with important findings to inform future evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a definitive randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M Clifford
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Pui-Sze Cheung
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Irish World Academy of Music and Dance, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94DK18, Ireland
| | - Nicola O' Malley
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Steven Byrne
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Department of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Limerick, Ireland
| | - Aoife Whiston
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland
| | - Brendan Kennelly
- Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Tumeliwa Mphepo
- Cairnes School of Business and Economics, University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada; Research Institute of St Joe's Hamilton, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton ON, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Quinette Louw
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Hilary Moss
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Irish World Academy of Music and Dance, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94DK18, Ireland
| | - Rosemary Joan Gowran
- School of Allied Health, Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94T9PX, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
| | - Desmond O' Neill
- Centre for Ageing, Neuroscience and the Humanities, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Liam Glynn
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catherine B Woods
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catherine Maher
- Rehabilitation Unit, Community Hospital of the Assumption, HSE, Thurles, Tipperary, Ireland
| | - Ali Sheikhi
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Jon Salsberg
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Orfhlaith Ni Bhriain
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Irish World Academy of Music and Dance, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94DK18, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woods CB, O’Regan A, Doyle C, Hayes G, Clifford A, Donnelly AE, Gillespie P, Glynn L, Murphy AW, Sheikhi A, Bengoechea EG. Move for Life an intervention for inactive adults aged 50 years and older: a cluster randomised feasibility trial. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1348110. [PMID: 38813401 PMCID: PMC11133700 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes. Methods A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes. Results Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all p < 0.05). Conclusion Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years. Clinical trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine B. Woods
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew O’Regan
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Ciaran Doyle
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Grainne Hayes
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Amanda Clifford
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Center, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Alan E. Donnelly
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Paddy Gillespie
- Centre for Research in Medical Devices (Cúram) and Health Economics and Policy Analysis Centre, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Liam Glynn
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew W. Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, Discipline of General Practice, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ali Sheikhi
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Enrique García Bengoechea
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johansson JF, Lam N, Ozer S, Hall J, Morton S, English C, Fitzsimons CF, Lawton R, Forster A, Clarke D. Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053945. [PMID: 35105631 PMCID: PMC8804646 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review and synthesise findings from process evaluations of interventions in trials which measured sedentary behaviour as an outcome in adults to explore: (1) how intervention content, implementation, mechanisms of impact and context influence outcomes and (2) how these interventions are experienced from different perspectives (participants, carers, staff). DESIGN Systematic review and narrative synthesis underpinned by the Medical Research Council process evaluation framework. DATA SOURCES Databases searches were conducted in March 2019 then updated in May 2020 and October 2021 in: CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, AMED; EMBASE, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included: Process evaluations of trials including interventions where sedentary behaviour was measured as an outcome in adults aged 16 or over from clinical or non-clinical populations. We excluded studies if interventions were delivered in educational or workplace settings, or if they were laboratory studies focused on immediate effects of breaking sitting. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers extracted and coded data into a framework and assessed the quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We synthesised findings using a narrative approach. RESULTS 17 process evaluations were included. Five interventions focused on reducing sedentary behaviour or sitting time, 12 aimed to increase physical activity or promote healthier lifestyles. Process evaluations indicated changes in sedentary behaviour outcomes were shaped by numerous factors including: barriers (eg, staffing difficulties and scheduling problems) and facilitators (eg, allowing for flexibility) to intervention delivery; contextual factors (eg, usual lifestyle and religious events) and individual factors (eg, pain, tiredness, illness, age and individual preferences). DISCUSSION Intervention requires careful consideration of different factors that could influence changes in sedentary behaviour outcomes to ensure that interventions can be tailored to suit different individuals and groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018087403.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Faye Johansson
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Natalie Lam
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Seline Ozer
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Jennifer Hall
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Sarah Morton
- Geriatric Medicine, The University of Edinburgh Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Coralie English
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle School of Health Sciences, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claire F Fitzsimons
- Institute of Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Quality and Safety Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - David Clarke
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A cluster analysis of device-measured physical activity behaviours and the association with chronic conditions, multi-morbidity and healthcare utilisation in adults aged 45 years and older. Prev Med Rep 2022; 24:101641. [PMID: 34976692 PMCID: PMC8684033 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Most adults do not meet physical activity guidelines with negative implications for health. The aim of this study was to profile adults using multiple physical activity behaviours and to investigate associations with chronic conditions, multi-morbidity and healthcare utilisation. The study used data generated from a sample of adults aged 45 years and older (N = 485), recruited to the Move for Life randomised control trial. Participants wore an accelerometer for eight consecutive days. Hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using the variables: moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, light intensity physical activity, step count, waking sedentary time, standing time and bed hours. Descriptive statistics were used to investigate associations with self-reported number of chronic illnesses, multi-morbidity and healthcare utilisation. Four distinct physical activity behaviour profiles were identified: inactive-sedentary (n = 50, 10.3%), low activity (n = 295, 60.8%), active (n = 111, 22.9%) and very active (n = 29, 6%). The inactive-sedentary cluster had the highest prevalence of chronic illnesses, in particular, mental illness (p = 0.006) and chronic lung disease (p = 0.032), as well as multi-morbidity, complex multi-morbidity and healthcare utilisation. The prevalence of any practice nurse visit (p = 0.033), outpatient attendances (p = 0.04) and hospital admission (p = 0.034) were higher in less active clusters. The results have provided an insight into how physical activity behaviour is associated with chronic illness and healthcare utilisation. A group within the group has been identified that is more likely to be unwell. Provisions need to be made to reduce barriers for participation in physical activity for adults with complex multi-morbidity and very low physical activity.
Collapse
|
5
|
García Bengoechea E, Clifford AM, Gallagher S, O' Regan A, O'Sullivan N, Casey M, Glynn L, Macken P, Sweeney J, Donnelly A, Murphy A, Woods CB. Juggling with theory, evidence, practice, and real-world circumstances: Development of a complex community intervention to increase physical activity in inactive adults aged 50 years and older - The Move for Life Study. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2021; 89:101983. [PMID: 34404011 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Despite well-known benefits of physical activity, in Ireland only 38 % of older adults are sufficiently active. Behavioural interventions are rarely developed systematically and, when reported, inadequate description often becomes a barrier for subsequent replication and scalability. In this article, we describe the development and characteristics of Move for Life, an intervention to reach and help inactive adults aged 50 years and older increase their physical activity. It was designed to fit within existing group-based structured physical activity programmes run by Local Sports Partnerships, thus maximising the likelihood of translation into policy and practice. Constructs from social cognitive theory, self-determination theory, and the conceptual model of group cohesion in exercise informed the conceptual model and the development of behavioural skills, social support, and group cohesion intervention strategies. Physical activity instructors supported by peer mentors, who also contributed to sustaining the intervention, implemented these strategies. Moving away from accounts of intervention development as a relatively simple linear process, we illustrate the complex interplay of theory, evidence, practice, and real-world contextual circumstances that shaped the development of Move for Life. Against this backdrop, we discuss issues relevant to the planning and reporting of behavioural and physical activity interventions in public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique García Bengoechea
- University of Limerick Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ireland
| | | | | | - Andrew O' Regan
- University of Limerick School of Medicine and Health Research Institute, Ireland
| | - Nollaig O'Sullivan
- University of Limerick Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ireland
| | - Monica Casey
- University of Limerick School of Medicine and Health Research Institute, Ireland
| | - Liam Glynn
- University of Limerick School of Medicine and Health Research Institute, Ireland; HRB Primary Care Clinical Trial Network Ireland, Ireland
| | | | | | - Alan Donnelly
- University of Limerick Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ireland
| | - Andrew Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trial Network Ireland, Ireland; NUI Galway Department of General Practice, Ireland
| | - Catherine B Woods
- University of Limerick Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O’Regan A, García Bengoechea E, Clifford AM, Casey M, Gallagher S, Glynn L, Doyle C, Woods C. How to improve recruitment, sustainability and scalability in physical activity programmes for adults aged 50 years and older: A qualitative study of key stakeholder perspectives. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240974. [PMID: 33119669 PMCID: PMC7595437 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Physical inactivity among adults aged 50 years and over is a worldwide health concern. The objectives of the study were to investigate the perspectives of those involved with existing physical activity programmes on optimising recruitment, sustainability and scalability of physical activity programmes for adults aged 50 years and over. METHODS The study was conducted in Ireland's Midwest region, where community-based physical activity programmes are delivered to groups by state-funded Local Sports Partnerships. Programme attendees, physical activity professionals and community advocates were recruited. One-to-one interviews and focus groups were conducted in 2018, recorded, transcribed and analysed by an interdisciplinary team experienced in qualitative research. Over a series of meetings, a thematic approach was used to code and analyse the transcripts, categorising data into higher order codes, themes and overarching themes with the purpose of making meaning of the data. Twenty-nine people participated in four focus groups and 18 participated in one-to-one interviews. FINDINGS Data analysis produced three overarching themes. "Age appropriate" explains how communication and the environment should be adapted to the needs of adults aged 50 years and older. "Culture and connection" refer to the interplay of individual and social factors that influence participation, including individual fears and insecurities, group cohesion and added value beyond the physical gains in these programmes. "Roles and partnerships" outlines how key collaborations may be identified and managed and how local ownership is key to success and scalability. CONCLUSION Successful recruitment, sustainability and scalability require an understanding that the target population has unique needs that must be catered for when planning interventions, communicating messages and choosing personnel. The findings of this study can inform the development of community-based programmes to increase physical activity in adults aged 50 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew O’Regan
- Graduate Entry Medical School, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Enrique García Bengoechea
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Amanda M. Clifford
- School of Allied Health, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Monica Casey
- Graduate Entry Medical School, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Stephen Gallagher
- Department of Psychology, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Liam Glynn
- Graduate Entry Medical School, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Board Primary Care Clinical Trial Network, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ciaran Doyle
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catherine Woods
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, Health Research Institute, Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|