Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma in Neurofibromatosis type 1: frequent surgeries and cardiovascular crises indicate the need for screening

Recurrent Pheochromocytoma With Bone Metastasis Eight Years After Bilateral Adrenalectomies in a Patient With Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Background/Objective

Pheochromocytoma can recur years after curative surgical resection. Rarely, it may reoccur as metastasis. Here, we present a case of metastatic pheochromocytoma to the bones in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), 8 years after initial resection of primary bilateral adrenal pheochromocytomas without metastases.

Case Report

A 44-year-old woman presented with diffuse body pain and palpitations. Her past medical history included NF1 and hypertension. Eight years prior to her current presentation, she had undergone a bilateral adrenalectomy for the management of bilateral adrenal pheochromocytomas. Her plasma metanephrines normalized after surgery and remained normal at her 1-year postoperative visit. She was subsequently lost to follow-up until her current presentation. Our evaluation revealed significantly elevated urine and plasma metanephrines as well as innumerable DOTATATE avid lesions along the axial and perpendicular spine compatible with a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. She was started on doxazosin and metoprolol and discharged home with a plan to be seen by Oncology to discuss systemic therapy.

Discussion

Predicting malignant disease in patients with primary tumors without metastases is challenging. There is no single factor that can reliably predict tumor behavior. It is unknown if individuals with NF1, who have a genetic predisposition for developing pheochromocytomas, are at an increased risk of malignant disease.

Conclusion

Due to a lack of accurate predictors, annual biochemical testing is recommended after primary tumor resection and in patients with a genetic predisposition. Strict lifelong follow-up should be strongly considered due to a possible higher risk of malignant disease.

Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Optimizing Management with a Multidisciplinary Approach

Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) is a complex genetic condition that affects multiple organ systems and presents a unique set of challenges for clinicians in its management. NF1 is a tumor predisposition syndrome that primarily affect the peripheral and central nervous systems via the impact of haploinsufficiency upon neural crest lineage cells including Schwann cells, melanocytes, fibroblasts, etc. NF1 can further lead to pathology of the skin, bones, visual system, and cardiovascular system, all of which can drastically reduce a patient's quality of life (QOL). This review provides a comprehensive examination of the many specialties required for the care of patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). We delve into the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of NF1, highlighting its diverse manifestations and the challenges they pose in management. The review underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to NF1, emphasizing how such an approach can significantly improve patient outcomes and overall QOL. Central to this approach is the role of the NF expert, who guides a multidisciplinary team (MDT) comprising healthcare professionals from many areas of expertise. The MDT collaboratively addresses the multifaceted needs of NF1 patients, ensuring comprehensive and personalized care. This review highlights the need for further investigation to optimize the workflow for NF1 patients in an MDT setting, and to improve implementation and efficacy.

Current prospects of hereditary adrenal tumors: towards better clinical management

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) are two rare types of adrenal gland malignancies. Regarding hereditary tumors, some patients with ACC are associated with with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), and those with PPGL with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Recent studies have expanded this spectrum to include other types of hereditary tumors, such as Lynch syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis. Individuals harboring germline TP53 pathogenic variants that cause LFS have heterogeneous phenotypes depending on the respective variant type. As an example, R337H variant found in Brazilian is known as low penetrant. While 50-80% of pediatric ACC patients harbored a LFS, such a strong causal relationship is not observed in adult patients, which suggests different pathophysiologies between the two populations. As for PPGL, because multiple driver genes, such as succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-related genes, RET, NF1, and VHL have been identified, universal multi-gene germline panel testing is warranted as a comprehensive and cost-effective approach. PPGL pathogenesis is divided into three molecular pathways (pseudohypoxia, Wnt signaling, and kinase signaling), and this classification is expected to result in personalized medicine based on genomic profiles. It remains unknown whether clinical characteristics differ between cases derived from genetic predisposition syndromes and sporadic cases, or whether the surveillance strategy should be changed depending on the genetic background or whether it should be uniform. Close cooperation among medical genomics experts, endocrinologists, oncologists, and early investigators is indispensable for improving the clinical management for multifaceted ACC and PPGL.

Prevalence of Endocrine Manifestations and GIST in 108 Systematically Screened Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Context

In patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), guidelines suggest screening for pheochromocytoma by metanephrine measurement and abdominal imaging, which may lead to the discovery of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and their differential diagnosis, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Other endocrine manifestations such as follicular thyroid carcinoma and primary hyperparathyroidism have also been reported in a few cases.

Objective

This study aimed to describe prevalence and clinical presentation of these manifestations through systematic screening in a large cohort of patients.

Methods

In this monocentric retrospective study, 108 patients with NF1 were included and screened for endocrine manifestations and GISTs. Clinical, laboratory, molecular profile, pathology, and morphologic (abdominal computed tomography scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging) and functional imaging were collected.

Results

Twenty-four patients (22.2% of the cohort, 16 female, mean age 42.6 years) presented with pheochromocytomas that were unilateral in 65.5%, benign in 89.7%, and with a ganglioneural component in 20.7%. Three female patients (2.8% of the cohort, aged 42-63 years) presented with well-differentiated GEP-NETs, and 4 (3.7%) with GISTs. One patient had primary hyperparathyroidism, 1 patient had medullary microcarcinoma, and 16 patients had goiter, multinodular in 10 cases. There was no correlation between pheochromocytoma and other NF1 tumoral manifestations, nor correlations between pheochromocytoma and NF1 genotype, despite a familial clustering in one-third of patients.

Conclusion

The pheochromocytoma prevalence in this NF1 cohort was higher (>20%) than previously described, confirming the interest of systematic screening, especially in young women. The prevalence of GEP-NETs and GISTs was about 3%, respectively. No phenotype-genotype correlation was observed.

Robotic Adrenalectomy in a Patient With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Pheochromocytoma

A 27-year-old female with a past medical history of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) presented with obstructive hydrocephalus due to a thalamic tumor. The neurosurgery team attempted an operative intervention twice, but both times, the patient experienced a hypertensive emergency and unstable supraventricular tachycardia upon induction of anesthesia. After the second failed surgery, a pheochromocytoma was suspected and the workup demonstrated a left pheochromocytoma. Pheochromocytomas in patients with NF1 are known to be more dangerous and labile, requiring in-depth discussion and preparation by personnel in endocrinology, anesthesia, neurosurgery, and minimally invasive surgery. Once the patient was stable and deemed fit for surgery, a robotic adrenalectomy followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement began. After induction of anesthesia, the patient went into hypertensive emergency again. However, the anesthesia team was prepared and quickly resolved this with medical therapy. Minimally invasive surgeons had the patient's live vitals displayed on their robotic monitors to increase their awareness of patient hemodynamics. This provided live feedback on the surgeons' effect as they removed the pheochromocytoma. Surgeons also performed vein clamping to preemptively see the effects of adrenalectomy. When vein clamping demonstrated safety to proceed, adrenalectomy was completed without complication. This case not only highlights the rare pathology of a woman with NF1 with pheochromocytoma, but it also demonstrates the importance of preparedness and communication among a multidisciplinary team in complex cases to ensure a successful outcome. Novel techniques were also used in performing a robotic-assisted adrenalectomy that can aid other adrenal surgeons.

Atypical and typical course of neurofibromatosis type 1 in combination with pheochromocytoma

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a hereditary disease that has a multisystem character of organism damage, a wide variability of clinical manifestations, up to the almost complete absence of typical symptoms. Phenotypic manifestations, their expressiveness and heaviness can be varied even among members of the same family with identical mutations. One of the possible clinical manifestations of this pathology is pheochromocytoma, the development of which is associated with a high risk of developing life-threatening conditions. Timely diagnosis of the disease, the choice of treatment tactics for the patient, genetic testing of blood relatives can significantly improve the survival rate and prognosis of the disease. In this article, on the presented clinical examples of patients with a typical and atypical course of type 1 neurofibromatosis in combination with pheochromocytoma, the issues of managing patients with this pathology are outlined.

[Expert consensus on diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1 (2021 edition)]

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant neoplastic disease caused by mutations in the NF1 gene and one of the most challenging diseases to treat. Patients have a characteristic phenotype with neurofibromas as the main features in different forms, including numerous cutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas involving the primary nerves, or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with a very short survival period after malignant transformation. NF1 patients also suffer from multi-system involvement, with a high rate of deformity and disability, making complete surgical resection more difficult. Currently, there is no consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of NF1 in China, and different disciplines have different understandings of NF1. Multidisciplinary systematic evaluations and cooperative treatments are the keys to improve the treatment, quality of life, and prognosis of NF1 patients. In 2020, the Department of Plastic Surgery of the Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine led the establishment of the first multi-center collaboration group for NF1 in China. Furthermore, the group had worked with renowned experts from the various departments including surgical oncology, medical oncology, dermatology, reproductive medicine, et al. in China to formulate the "Expert consensus on diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1 (2021 edition)", aiming to promote standardized and homogeneous treatment covering the whole life cycle of NF1 patients and improve the treatment level and outcome of NF1 patients in China.

Metastatic cluster 2-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a single-center experience and systematic review

Risk of metastatic disease in the cluster 2-related pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) is low. In MEN2 patients, identification of origin of metastases from pheochromocytoma (PCC) or medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is challenging as both are of neuroendocrine origin. We aim to describe our experience and perform a systematic review to assess prevalence, demographics, biochemistry, diagnostic evaluation, management, and predictors of cluster 2-related metastatic PPGL. Retrospective analysis of 3 cases from our cohort and 43 cases from world literature was done. For calculation of prevalence, all reported patients (n = 3063) of cluster 2 were included. We found that the risk of metastasis in cluster 2-related PPGL was 2.6% (2% in RET, 5% in NF1, 4.8% in TMEM127 and 16.7% in MAX variation). In metastatic PCC in MEN2, median age was 39 years, bilateral tumors were present in 71% and median tumor size was 9.7 cm (range 4-19) with 43.5% mortality. All patients had a primary tumor size ≥4 cm. Origin of primary tumor was diagnosed by histopathology of metastatic lesion in 11 (57.9%), 131I-MIBG scan in 6 (31.6%), and selective venous sampling and CT in 1 (5.3%) patient each. In subgroup of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), median age was 46 years (range 14-59) with median tumor size 6 cm and 57% mortality. To conclude, the risk of metastatic disease in cluster 2-related PPGL is low, being especially high in tumors with size ≥4 cm and associated with high mortality. One-third patients of NF1 with metastatic PPGL had presented in second decade of life. Long-term studies are needed to formulate management recommendations.

Genetics of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes our current understanding of germline and somatic genetics and genomics of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCC/PGL), describes existing knowledge gaps, and discusses future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) are found in up to 40% of those with PCC/PGL. Tumors with germline PVs are broadly categorized as Cluster 1 (pseudohypoxia), including those with SDH, VHL, FH, and EPAS1 PVs, or Cluster 2 (kinase signaling) including those with NF1, RET, TMEM127, and MAX PVs. Somatic driver mutations exist in some of the same genes (RET, VHL, NF1, EPAS1) as well as in additional genes including HRAS, CSDE1 and genes involved in cell immortalization (ATRX and TERT). Other somatic driver events include recurrent fusion genes involving MAML3.

SUMMARY

PCC/PGL have the highest association with germline PVs of all human solid tumors. Expanding our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PCC/PGL is essential to advancements in diagnosis and surveillance and the development of novel therapies for these unique tumors.

Case report of a man with multiple paragangliomas and pathogenic germline variants in both NF1 and SDHD

We report a novel case of multiple paragangliomas in a patient who was identified with pathogenic variants in both NF1 and SDHD genes. The proband is a man with known familial NF1 disease, diagnosed clinically in childhood. Multiple head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGL) were found during investigations for acute left sided neurological symptoms, in the region of his known plexiform neurofibroma. He was referred for genetic counselling. He underwent surgery to remove a left carotid body tumor (CBT). A pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma gene panel was tested. Blood and HNPGL tumor DNA were analyzed by whole exome sequencing. In addition to the NF1 truncating variant c.5107delA, p.(Ser1703AlafsTer7), the SDHD truncating pathogenic variant c.3G > A, p.(Met1?) was found. Tumor sequencing showed no LOH of SDHD or NF1, but monoallelic loss of 11p15 and 11q12.2-q12.3 was observed. Co-occurrence of pathogenic variants in multiple cancer susceptibility genes is rare but possible, identified by the increased use of panel testing. This is the first description of a patient presenting with NF1 and SDHD dual pathology, with HNPGL development due to SDHD. This case illustrates the central role of genetic sequencing in PPGLs and the strong genotype-phenotype correlations of different genes.

Association between pheochromocytoma and neurofibromatosis type I: a rare entity in the African population

The association of pheochromocytoma in patients with neurofibromatosis type I has rarely been reported in low-income countries, especially on the African continent. A 43-year-old woman with neurofibromatosis type I was diagnosed with a right adrenal pheochromocytoma in Pretoria, South Africa. To our knowledge, this report is the first case to be published of a patient with neurofibromatosis type I diagnosed with a pheochromocytoma in Pretoria, and one of three cases on the African continent. The rarity may be due to the two associated conditions being under-reported, undiagnosed, misdiagnosed or possibly the association is rare on the African continent. The clinician dealing with these two conditions should be aware of the association.

Pheochromocytoma crisis in a patient with newly diagnosed neurofibromatosis type 1

Pheochromocytoma occasionally engenders catecholamine-induced hypertension crisis. Pheochromocytoma is clinically identified in 0.1%-5.7% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), which is 10 times more frequently than in healthy individuals. This report describes a case of newly diagnosed NF1 presenting with pheochromocytoma crisis, with severe electrolyte depletion and deteriorating recurrent ventricular tachycardia storm. Characteristic skin lesions such as café-au-lait macules and neurofibromas contributed to the diagnosis of NF1 and pheochromocytoma. No recurrence of electrolyte depletion was found after the adrenalectomy. Primary care physicians must distinguish the characteristic skin lesions of NF1, such as café-au-lait macules and neurofibromas and recognise the risk for pheochromocytoma.

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with Concurrent Multiple Endocrine Disorders: Adenomatous Goiter, Primary Hyperparathyroidism, and Acromegaly

We encountered a 70-year-old Japanese woman with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) who had a history of pheochromocytoma and concurrently developed adenomatous goiter, primary hyperparathyroidism, and acromegaly. The patient had a somatotroph adenoma of the adenohypophysis that predisposed her to multinodular goiter. Three parathyroid tumors were detected by cervical ultrasonography and cervicothoracic computed tomography. Genetic analyses did not reveal genetic alterations (e.g. loss-of-function mutation) in the causative genes of endocrine tumors, including MEN1, RET, VHL, CDKN1B, and CDKN2C. The NF1 gene could not be analyzed genetically due to the patient's refusal. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of endocrinopathy concurrence in NF1 remain to be elucidated.

Pheochromocytoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumours in an adult neurofibromatosis type 1 patient: a rare co-occurrence

The risk of tumours including pheochromocytoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) has been reported to be higher in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. The concomitant occurrence of these two tumours was rare in NF1 patient and most were symptomatic. In this case report, we describe the case of a 47-year-old man with NF1 who presented with microscopic haematuria. Neither hypertension nor any gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by the patient. While investigating for haematuria, left adrenal mass and arterial enhancing lesions in the small bowel were incidentally documented during computerised urography. The patient subsequently underwent a left adrenalectomy and small bowel resection. The pheochromocytoma and multiple GIST tumours were diagnosed based on pathology. Here, we discuss the rare association of pheochromocytoma and GIST and the asymptomatic presentation of those tumours in an NF1 patient. We further suggest that in NF1 patients a heightened level of vigilance can help identify this infrequent combination.

Abdominal neoplastic manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant hereditary tumor syndrome, with a wide clinicopathologic spectrum. It is defined by characteristic central nervous system, cutaneous and osseous manifestations, and by mutations in the NF1 gene, which is involved in proliferation via p21, RAS, and MAP kinase pathways. Up to 25% of NF1 patients develop intra-abdominal neoplastic manifestations including neurogenic (commonly plexiform neurofibromas and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors), interstitial cells of Cajal (hyperplasia, gastrointestinal stromal tumors), neuroendocrine, and embryonal tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma). Nonspecific symptoms, multifocal disease, or coexistence of 2 or more tumor types make patients challenging to diagnose and manage. Screening for intra-abdominal tumors in NF1 patients remains controversial, and currently no guidelines are established. Management decisions are complex and often informed by single-center experiences or case studies in the literature, though the field is rapidly evolving. Thus, NF1 patients should be followed in specialist centers familiar with their wide spectrum of pathology and with multidisciplinary care including specialized pathology and radiology. This review will (1) provide a contemporaneous synthesis of the literature and our multi-institutional clinical experiences with intra-abdominal neoplasms in NF1 patients, (2) present a classification framework for this heterogeneous group of disorders, and (3) outline approaches to screening, surveillance, diagnosis, and management.

‘Adrenal rush’ in a patient with Neurofibromatosis-1

Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF-1) is a genetic neuro-cutaneous disorder that is associated with an increased prevalence of pheochromocytoma (PHEO). However, this association may not be commonly anticipated by physicians, as patients may be normotensive. In addition, NF-1 patients can be asymptomatic and/or normotensive. These factors can result in a delayed or missed diagnosis of pheochromocytoma leading to catastrophic complications. Currently, it is recommended to perform annual blood pressure monitoring in patients with NF-1 and to test for pheochromocytoma only if found to be hypertensive. However, recent studies show that this practice may lead to underdiagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Therefore, suggesting routine biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma in all patients with NF-1.

In this case report, we discuss the factors which can lead to a delayed diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in a patient with known NF-1 and hypertension.

Diagnostic des phéochromocytomes et paragangliomes

Les phéochromocytomes et les paragangliomes sont des tumeurs rares responsables d’une surmorbidité et d’une surmortalité. Au cours de ces 20 dernières années, de nombreuses avancées ont permis de mieux les caractériser sur le plan phénotypique (via l’imagerie métabolique) et génotypique (avec la mise en évidence de nombreux gènes de prédisposition). La prise en charge d’un phéochromocytome ou d’un paragangliome nécessite désormais le recours à un centre expert dès la phase diagnostique. L’objectif de cette revue est de souligner les principales caractéristiques de ces tumeurs, et ce, afin de sensibiliser le clinicien aux différentes étapes permettant d’aboutir à une prise en charge optimale.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Phaeochromocytomas/Paragangliomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Introduction: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are at risk of developing phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PHAEO/PG). Unlike in other familial PHAEO/PG syndromes, there are no published guidelines regarding screening in asymptomatic or normotensive patients with NF1. This strategy may be associated with preventable morbidities in those patients who ultimately present with symptomatic PHAEO/PG. Objective: To describe the mode of presentation and the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes attributed to PHAEO/PG in NF1. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary referral centre in collaboration with a national complex NF1 centre. Hospital records and databases between 1998–2018 were searched. Results: Twenty-seven patients with NF1 and PHAEO/PG were identified. In all but one, PHAEO/PG was diagnosed after NF1. The median age at the time of diagnosis of PHAEO/PG was 43 years (range 22–65) and 21/27 (78%) were females. The diagnosis was mostly incidental in 13/27 (48%) while classical PHAEO/PG symptoms were found in 15/27 (56%), and hypertension was found in 14/27 (52%) of NF1 patients prior to PHAEO/PG diagnosis. No patient had undergone biochemical screening for PHAEO/PG. Metastatic disease was evident in 2/27 patients, 8 suffered potentially avoidable complications attributed to PHAEO/PG (including two deaths). Conclusion: The course of PHAEO/PG in NF1 is associated with an unpredictable presentation and potentially avoidable adverse outcomes. We recommend that routine biochemical screening for PHAEO/PG should be part of the care package offered to all patients with NF1 by regular measurements of plasma free or urinary fractionated metanephrines starting from early adolescence and repeated every 3 years.

Clonidine suppression testing for pheochromocytoma in neurofibromatosis type 1

Compared with the general population, rates of pheochromocytoma are higher in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. However, pheochromocytoma testing is often plagued by false positive results. Here we present a patient with NF1, elevated urinary metanephrine levels, and an indeterminate adrenal nodule. Clonidine suppression testing aided diagnosis and led to definitive surgical treatment that confirmed a pheochromocytoma. Pheochromocytoma screening and clonidine suppression testing can both aid in the evaluation for catecholamine-secreting tumours.

Isolated Pheochromocytoma in a 73-Year-Old Man With No Clinical Manifestations of Type 1 Neurofibromatosis Carrying an Unsuspected Deletion of the Entire NF1 Gene

Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are a rare cause of endocrine hypertension that requires genetic counseling since at least 30% of PHEOs are associated with a germline mutation in a susceptibility gene. Neurofibromatosis type 1, NF1 is amongst the 16 known causing genes for pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. We report a case of a 73-year-old man with PHEO in whom genetic testing revealed a large pathogenic heterozygous deletion of 1.14 Mb encompassing the entire coding sequence of the NF1 gene while the patient showed no signs of clinical NF1.This case illustrates that the diagnosis of NF1 should not be excluded in patients with PHEO in the absence of clinical diagnosis of the disease and support that older patients with PHEO should also be offered genetic counseling.