The association between office blood pressure and fluid status using bioimpedance spectroscopy in stable continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

Association Between Peritoneal Glucose Absorption, Lipid Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Nondiabetic Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Excessive sugar intake increases the energy metabolic burden and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients on peritoneal dialysis absorb much more glucose than the World Health Organization recommends, but the link to CVD is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between peritoneal glucose absorption, lipid metabolism, and CVD.

METHODS

We applied generalized additive mixed effects and mixed effects Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of peritoneal glucose absorption on lipid profiles and CVD risk. We performed subgroup analyses by using protein intake (normalized protein nitrogen appearance [nPNA] and normalized protein catabolic rate [nPCR] were used to assess protein intake) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP).

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, peritoneal glucose absorption per 10 g/d increase was associated with an increase in cholesterol of 0.145 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.086-0.204) mmol/L. No link with the total risk of CVD was observed; however, protein intake and hs-CRP levels affected the relationship between glucose absorption and CVD risk. Patients with values for nPNA and nPCR <1.0 g/(kg·d) were associated with a lower risk of CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 95% CI: 0.68 (0.46-0.98)) with glucose absorption per 10 g/d increase. While patients with hs-CRP levels ≥3 mg/d or values for nPNA or nPCR ≥1.0 g/(kg·d) were associated with a higher risk of CVD (HR 95% CI: 1.32 (1.07-1.63); 1.31 (1.02-1.68)) for glucose absorption per 10 g/d increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found a positive correlation between peritoneal glucose absorption and lipid profiles. Increased glucose absorption was associated with a lower risk of CVD in lower protein intake patients and a higher risk of CVD in higher hs-CRP or protein intake levels in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

The superiority of bioimpedance vs. echocardiography and pitting edema in predicting automated office blood pressure in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

To achieve optimal blood pressure control in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, identifying methods of volume assessment with the strongest correlation with blood pressure is essential.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 52 CAPD patients were assigned to automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement, assessment of pedal pitting edema, bioimpedance analysis (BIA), and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI%) measurement. Data were analyzed using STATA ver.17, and the significance level was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were divided based on their AOBP readings. 29 (55.8%) of patients had uncontrolled AOBP. Overhydration (OH) and the grade of pitting edema were significantly higher in the uncontrolled AOBP group. OH was identified as the best variable for predicting blood pressure (p ≤ 0.001) and detecting uncontrolled blood pressure (AUC = 0.832) using multivariate linear regression and ROC analysis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BIA-derived OH was the best variable for predicting systolic and diastolic AOBP, outperforming IVCCI% and pitting edema.

The Implementation of a Modified Fluid Assessment Tool to Improve the Clinical Assessment, Detection, and Management of Blood Pressure Control and Fluid Alterations Among Hemodialysis Patients

Background

Fluid overload is a common complication of the care of End-stage Renal Disease patients that may lead to prolonged hospitalization and mortality. This warrants an effective and systemic approach to early recognition and management to improve patient outcomes.

Aim

This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified fluid assessment tool to improve accurate clinical assessments, detection, and management of blood pressure control and fluid alteration among hemodialysis patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, data were collected from forty-three dialysis patients who were seen and followed up from a dialysis unit of an acute care hospital during 8 weeks of standard care. A modified assessment tool was used to systematically highlight the appropriateness of the patient set dry weight using intradialytic weight gain (IWDG) and patient blood pressure. Paired sample t-test and repeated measure ANOVA within-group analysis were applied to compare the mean difference score for IDWG and the mean arterial pressure within the study group, respectively.

Result

A total of 43 patients were enrolled (mean age, 59.07) (ranges 27-88 years) (SD - 14.30); 51.16% female; 79% Emirati Nationals, with Chronic Kidney Disease. A repeated measure ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference in the mean arterial pressure within the study group based on time, over six measurements (p = 0.001). However, the difference between the pre- and post-intra-dialytic weight gain mean scores yields insignificant results (p = 0.346).

Conclusion

The implementation of a modified assessment tool improved blood pressure control, increased staff and physician involvement in assessing patient dry weight facilitated through fluid status evaluation, methodical assessment of dry weight, and precise fluid removal calculation, enhancing overall blood pressure and fluid management in HD patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in dialysis patients: a systematic review

In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis, hypertension is common but often inadequately controlled. The prevalence of hypertension varies widely among studies because of differences in the definition of hypertension and the methods of used to measure blood pressure (BP), i.e., peri-dialysis or ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Recently, ABPM has become the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension in dialysis patients. Home BP monitoring can also be a good alternative to ABPM, emphasizing BP measurement outside the hemodialysis (HD) unit. One thing for sure is pre- and post-dialysis BP measurements should not be used alone to diagnose and manage hypertension in dialysis patients. The exact target of BP and the relationship between BP and all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality are unclear in this population. Many observational studies with HD cohorts have almost universally reported a U-shaped or even an L-shaped association between BP and all-cause mortality, but most of these data are based on the BP measured in HD units. Some data with ABPM have shown a linear association between BP and mortality even in HD patients, similar to the general population. Supporting this, the results of meta-analysis have shown a clear benefit of BP reduction in HD patients. Therefore, further research is needed to determine the optimal target BP in the dialysis population, and for now, an individualized approach is appropriate, with particular emphasis on avoiding excessively low BP. Maintaining euvolemia is of paramount importance for BP control in dialysis patients. Patient heterogeneity and the lack of comparative evidence preclude the recommendation of one class of medication over another for all patients. Recently, however, β-blockers could be considered as a first-line therapy in dialysis patients, as they can reduce sympathetic overactivity and left ventricular hypertrophy, which contribute to the high incidence of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Several studies with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have also reported promising results in reducing mortality in dialysis patients. However, safety issues such as hyperkalemia or hypotension should be further evaluated before their use.

Therapeutic roles of thiazides and loop diuretics in blood pressure control and renal protection against chronic kidney disease

Fluid overload secondary to loss of functional nephron mass can elevate blood pressure, which is characteristic of hypertension shown in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, it is logical to use diuretics at appropriate dose to lower blood pressure in patients with CKD and hypertension. Despite the theoretical background on the use of diuretics in CKD, there have been no definitive data on the effectiveness or safety of diuretics as first-line therapy for the management of hypertension in patients with CKD. Results from some clinical trials have demonstrated that diuretics would not lower blood pressure. They could even worsen electrolyte imbalance and kidney function when they are administered in patients with CKD. Major clinical practice guidelines on management of blood pressure or CKD have stated that evidence for benefits of thiazide diuretics is not conclusive yet in patients with advanced CKD, although loop diuretics are often effective for volume control at lower glomerular filtration rate. Recently, evidence for diuretics as effective blood pressure lowering agents in patients with advanced CKD is increasing. Renoprotective effect of thiazide or loop diuretics might represent a consequence of their influence on blood pressure or their ability to potentiate the effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade by making intraglomerular pressure more renin-angiotensin system-dependent, although their direct benefit on renal function remains controversial. This review summarizes recent data on the possible role of diuretics in lowering blood pressure, slowing the progression of kidney disease, and reducing cardiovascular risk in CKD patients.

Very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD): an antihypertensive nutritional approach

BACKGROUND

Obesity is accompanied by hormonal, inflammatory and endothelial alterations. These alterations induce a stimulation of several other mechanisms that contribute to the hypertensive state and to increase the cardiovascular morbidity. This pilot, open - label, single- center, prospective clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effect of very low- calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) on blood pressure (BP) in women with of obesity and hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 137 women, who met the inclusion criteria and accepted to adhere to VLCKD, were consecutively enrolled. Assessment of anthropometric parameters (weight, height, and waist circumference), body composition (through bioelectrical impedance analysis), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and blood sample collection were carried out at baseline and after 45 days of the active phase of VLCKD.

RESULTS

After VLCKD all the women experienced a significant reduction in body weight and an overall improvement of body composition parameters. In addition, high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs- CRP) levels were significantly diminished (p < 0.001), while phase angle (PhA) increased by almost 9% (p < 0.001). Interestingly, both SBP and DBP were significantly improved (-12.89% and - 10.77%, respectively; p < 0.001). At baseline, SBP and DBP showed statistically significant correlations with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, hs-CRP levels, PhA, total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), Na / K ratio, and fat mass. Even after VLCKD, all correlations among SBP and DBP with the study variables were statistically significant, except for the association between DBP and Na / K ratio. Changes (%) in both SBP and DBP were associated with ∆BMI%, ∆PhA% and ∆hs- CRP levels (p < 0.001). In addition, only ∆SBP% was associated with ∆waist circumference (p = 0.017), ∆TBW (p = 0.017), and ∆fat mass (p < 0.001); while only ∆DBP% was associated with ∆ECW (p = 0.018), and ∆Na / K ratio (p = 0.048). After adjusting for ∆BMI, ∆WC, ∆PhA, ∆TBW, and ∆fat mass, the correlation between changes in ∆SBP and ∆hs -CRP levels remained statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, the correlation between ∆DBP and ∆hs- CRP levels also remained statistically significant after adjustment for ∆BMI, ∆PhA, ∆Na / K ratio, and ∆ECW (p < 0.001). From multiple regression analysis ∆hs- CRP levels seemed to be the main predictor of changes of BP (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VLCKD reduces BP in women with of obesity and hypertension in a safely manner.

Assessment of Hydration Status and Blood Pressure in a Tertiary Care Hospital at Al-Khobar

Background

High blood pressure is a major cardiovascular risk factor. It is a leading cause of increasing morbidity and mortality worldwide. One-third of the adult population worldwide suffers from hypertension. Salt intake, obesity, decreased physical activity, and smoking are well known to increase blood pressure. Fluid retention is the main contributing factor to primary hypertension and adversely affects the cardiovascular system. The emerging evidence suggests a relationship between blood pressure and hydration status. Our study aims to assess the correlation between hydration status and blood pressure. We aim to assess the hydration status in subjects with normal and high blood pressure and to investigate the association of hydration status with hemodynamic measurement.

Methodology

This cross-sectional and observational study included adult (>18 years) male and female subjects who agreed to participate. In total, 235 subjects were recruited by convenience sampling from (1) patients and caregivers attending geriatric and internal medicine clinics, and (2) visitors coming to King Fahad University Hospital at Al-Khobar. There were five patients on oral diuretics who were excluded from the study. Data were collected from September 2021 to March 2022. Hydration status was measured by a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (Bioscan 920, Maltron International Ltd. Rayleigh, UK). Hemodynamic measurements included heart rate per minute, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure (the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure), and mean arterial pressure calculated as blood diastolic pressure plus one-third of pulse pressure. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistics for windows, version 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive data were reported using means with standard deviations for numerical data and relative frequencies (percentage) for categorical data. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Comparison between groups was done using a one-way analysis of variance test.

Results

Extracellular water percentage was higher in hypertensive (45.0 ± 2) than prehypertensive (43.5 ± 3) or normotensive (43.0 ± 2) (p = 0.001) subjects. In contrast, intracellular water percentage and total body water percentage were significantly negatively related to hypertension status.

Conclusions

Our results have shown a strong association between hypertension status and hydration parameters. In our study, hypertensive subjects tended to have lower total body water percentage and intracellular water percentage (bioimpedance value) than normotensive subjects. This might promote more research regarding the relationship between hypohydration and cardiovascular disease pathophysiology. This outcome should raise awareness about proper hydration as hypohydration can be a causative factor for hypertension.