1
|
Engelaar M, Bos N, van Schelven F, Lorenzo I Sunyer N, Couespel N, Apolone G, Brunelli C, Caraceni A, Ferrer M, Groenvold M, Kaasa S, Ciliberto G, Lombardo C, Pietrobon R, Pravettoni G, Sirven A, Vachon H, Gilbert A, Rademakers J. Collaborating with cancer patients and informal caregivers in a European study on quality of life: protocol to embed patient and public involvement within the EUonQoL project. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2024; 10:59. [PMID: 38863075 PMCID: PMC11167745 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00597-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement (PPI) has become an essential part of health research. There is a need for genuine involvement in order to ensure that research is relevant to patients. This can then improve the quality, relevance, and impact of health research, while at the same time reducing wasted research and in doing so bringing science and society closer together. Despite the increasing attention for this involvement, it is not yet common practice to report on proposed activities. An article reporting planned PPI could provide guidance and inspiration for the wider academic community in future activities. Therefore, this current article aims to describe the way in which PPI principles are incorporated in the research project called "Quality of Life in Oncology: measuring what matters for cancer patients and survivors in Europe (EUonQoL)." This project aims to develop a new set of questionnaires to enable cancer patients to assess their quality of life, entitled the EUonQoL-Kit. METHODS The first step is to recruit cancer patients and their informal caregivers as co-researchers in order to train them to collaborate with the researchers. Based on their skills and preferences, they are then assigned to several of the project's work packages. Their individual roles, tasks, and responsibilities regarding the work packages, to which they have been assigned, are evaluated and adapted when necessary. The impact of their involvement is evaluated by both the researchers and co-researchers. DISCUSSION PPI is a complex and dynamic process. As such, the overall structure of the research may be defined while at the same time leaving room for certain aspects to be filled in later. Our research is, we believe, relevant as co-researcher involvement in such a large European project as EUonQoL is a new development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel Engelaar
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nanne Bos
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Femke van Schelven
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Giovanni Apolone
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Montse Ferrer
- Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Bispebjerg/Frederiksberg Hospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hugo Vachon
- Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Jany Rademakers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spencer B, Hugh-Jones S, Cottrell D, Pini S. The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:91. [PMID: 37828630 PMCID: PMC10568929 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests resources and services benefit from being developed in collaboration with the young people they aim to support. Despite this, patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) with young people is often tokenistic, limited in engagement and not developmentally tailored to young people. Our paper aims to build knowledge and practice for meaningfully engaging with young people in research design, analysis and as research participants. METHODS We report the participatory processes from the INSCHOOL project, examining long-term health conditions and schooling among 11-18 year olds. Young people were consulted at the inception of the project through a hospital-based youth forum. This began a partnership where young people co-designed study documents, informed the recruitment process, developed creative approaches to data collection, participated in pilot interviews, co-analysed the qualitative data and co-presented results. RESULTS PPIE advisors, participants and researchers all benefitted from consistent involvement of young people throughout the project. Long-term engagement allowed advisors and researchers to build rapport and facilitated openness in sharing perspectives. PPIE advisors valued being able to shape the initial aims and language of the research questions, and contribute to every subsequent stage of the project. Advisors co-designed flexible data collection methods for the qualitative project that provided participants with choices in how they took part (interviews, focus groups, written tasks). Further choice was offered through co-designed preparation activities where participants completed one of four creative activities prior to the interview. Participants were therefore able to have control over how they participated and how they described their school experiences. Through participatory analysis meetings advisors used their first-hand experiences to inform the creation of themes and the language used to describe these themes. PPIE in every stage of the process helped researchers to keep the results grounded in young people's experience and challenge their assumptions as adults. CONCLUSIONS Young people have much to offer and the INSCHOOL project has shown that researchers can meaningfully involve young people in all aspects of research. Consistent PPIE resulted in a project where the voices of young people were prioritised throughout and power imbalances were reduced, leading to meaningful participant-centred data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Spencer
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | | | - David Cottrell
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon Pini
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burgher T, Shepherd V, Nollett C. Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:38. [PMID: 37268986 PMCID: PMC10234794 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement (often referred to as patient and public involvement or PPI) integrates the voices of the public in health and care research. However, groups such as care home residents are often excluded from involvement opportunities due to the complexities of involving people with additional care and communication needs. Despite a range of approaches being used, there is little understanding about how best to incorporate their experiences, and those of other care home stakeholders, into the design and conduct of research. OBJECTIVE A systematic review was conducted to identify PPI methods that better meet the specific needs of care home stakeholders. This was undertaken by (1) outlining effective PPI approaches used in care home research and the key stakeholders involved; (2) describing the role of PPI in different care home contexts and (3) identifying stakeholders' experiences and attitudes towards PPI in care homes. METHODS Databases CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for English language papers from inception to November 2021. A narrative synthesis approach was utilised to organise the extracted data into five themes. RESULTS The search initially yielded 2314 articles (following de-duplication), with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria. Articles reported a range of input from stakeholders (including residents, staff, relatives and community stakeholders), with the impact of PPI varying according to the type of care establishment and research context. The experiences and reflections of stakeholders' about their involvement in care home research varied, with some studies offering first-hand accounts compared with summaries from researchers. Some articles explicitly evaluated the effectiveness of the PPI approach using specific outcome measures whilst others indirectly described the impact of their approach. Five themes were identified as characterising an effective PPI approach: (1) valuing stakeholders' perspectives, (2) awareness of the multi-faceted research context, (3) ensuring inclusivity and transparency, (4) maintaining flexibility and adaptability and (5) utilising resources and wider support. CONCLUSION Effective PPI in care home research requires researchers to create person-centred opportunities to adequately involve groups with physical and cognitive impairments. The findings led to the creation of evidence-based practical recommendations to support future involvement opportunities and help researchers develop strategies for inclusive opportunities for involvement. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The review was prospectively registered on PROPSERO (CRD42021293353).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria Shepherd
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| | - Claire Nollett
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4Th Floor, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The health of detainees and the role of primary care: Position paper of the European Forum for Primary Care. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2022; 23:e29. [PMID: 35574709 PMCID: PMC9112672 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423622000184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
This position paper aims to increase awareness among primary care practitioners and policymakers about the specific and complex health needs of people who experience incarceration. We focus on the importance of primary care and of continuity of care between prison and community. We highlight what is known from the literature on the health of people who experience incarceration, on the organisation of prison health care, and on the role of primary care both during and after detention. We present three case descriptions of detainees' encounters with the organisation of prison health care in three European countries. Finally, we describe the position that the European Forum for Primary Care takes. Prisoners and ex-prisoners have a worse physical and mental health compared with a cross-section of the population. However, access to good quality treatment and care is often worse than in the outside situation. In particular, well-organised primary care in the prison context could benefit prisoners and, indirectly, society at large. Moreover, continuity of care between the community and the prison situation needs improvement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mentink M, Noordman J, Busch M, van Vliet L, Timmer-Bonte JA, van Dulmen S. Towards an open and effective dialogue on complementary medicine in oncology: protocol of patient participatory study 'COMMON'. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053005. [PMID: 34670766 PMCID: PMC8529983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately half of patients with cancer use some form of complementary medicine alongside conventional cancer treatment. The topic of complementary medicine often remains undiscussed in consultations between patients with cancer and their healthcare providers. This results in increased risks for adverse or interaction effects and decreased access to the benefits of evidence-based complementary medicine for patients with cancer. This paper describes the design of patient participatory study titled 'COMMON' that aims to explore and enhance open and effective communication about complementary medicine in oncology. The study is carried out in collaboration with 12 (former) patients with breast cancer as coresearchers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study complies with the six steps of the intervention mapping framework. Three non-academic hospitals recruit participants (patients with cancer, oncology healthcare providers and managers) for interviews about the organisation, experiences and needs regarding complementary medicine. To assess communication about complementary medicine, recorded oncology consultations are analysed. For an overview of evidence-based complementary medicine available to patients with cancer, a review of reviews is conducted on the evidence on cancer patient-reported outcomes of complementary medicine frequently used by patients with cancer, supplemented with an online search and survey among organisations and persons providing complementary medicine to patients with cancer. Together, these steps generate input for the development of a toolbox that supports an open and effective discussion on complementary medicine in oncology. In a pilot study, acceptability and usability of the toolbox are assessed among patients with cancer and oncology healthcare providers. Dissemination of the toolbox is covered by the commitment of stakeholder parties. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Ethics Committee Arnhem-Nijmegen declared the study was exempted from formal approval under the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. The results will be disseminated through open-access, peer-reviewed publications, stakeholder-reporting and presentations at relevant conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Mentink
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Liesbeth van Vliet
- Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sandra van Dulmen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, NIVEL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Rooijen M, van Dijk-de Vries A, Lenzen S, Dalemans R, Moser A, Beurskens A. How to foster successful implementation of a patient reported experience measurement in the disability sector: an example of developing strategies in co-creation. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:45. [PMID: 34167588 PMCID: PMC8229276 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The integrated uptake of patient-reported experience measures, using outcomes for the micro, meso and macro level, calls for a successful implementation process which depends on how stakeholders are involved in this process. Currently, the impact of stakeholders on strategies to improve the integrated use is rarely reported, and information about how stakeholders can be engaged, including care-users who are communication vulnerable, is limited. This study illustrates the impact of all stakeholders on developing tailored implementation strategies and provides insights into supportive conditions to involve care-users who are communication vulnerable. METHODS With the use of participatory action research, implementation strategies were co-created by care-users who are communication vulnerable (n = 8), professionals (n = 12), management (n = 6) and researchers (n = 5) over 9 months. Data collection consisted of audiotapes, reports, and researchers' notes. Conventional content analysis was performed. RESULTS The impact of care-users concerned the strategies' look and feel, understandability and relevance. Professionals influenced impact on how to use strategies and terminology. The impact of management was on showing the gap between policy and practice, and learning from previous improvement failures. Researchers showed impact on analysis, direction of strategy changes and translating academic and development experience into practice. The engagement of care-users who are communication vulnerable was supported, taking into account organisational issues and the presentation of information. CONCLUSIONS The impact of all engaged stakeholders was identified over the different levels strategies focused on. Care-users who are communication vulnerable were valuable engaged in co-creation implementation strategies by equipping them to their needs and routines, which requires adaptation in communication, delimited meetings and a safe group environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION Reviewed by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zuyderland-Zuyd (METCZ20190006). NL7594 registred at https://www.trialregister.nl/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein van Rooijen
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229, HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anneke van Dijk-de Vries
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229, HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Lenzen
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Dalemans
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Albine Moser
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229, HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Beurskens
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229, HA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gheduzzi E, Masella C, Morelli N, Graffigna G. How to prevent and avoid barriers in co-production with family carers living in rural and remote area: an Italian case study. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:16. [PMID: 33731217 PMCID: PMC7968224 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00259-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Co-production has been widely recognised as a potential means to reduce the dissatisfaction of citizens, the inefficacy of service providers, and conflicts in relations between the former and the latter. However, the benefits of co-production has begun to be questioned: co-production has often been taken for granted, and its effects may not be effective. To understand and prevent unsuccessful citizen and provider collaboration, the recent literature has begun to focus on the causes of co-destruction. This paper investigates how the barriers that may arise during the co-production of a new social service with family carers can be identified and interpreted. METHODS To investigate this topic, we undertook a single case study - a longitudinal project (Place4Carers (Graffigna et al., BMJ Open 10:e037570, 2020)) intended to co-produce a new social care service with and for the family carers of elderly patients living in rural and remote areas. We organised collaborative co-assessment workshops and semi-structured interviews to collect the views of family carers and service providers on the co-production process. A reflexive approach was used in the analysis for collecting the opinions of the research team that participated in the co-production process. RESULTS The analysis revealed four main co-production barriers: lack of trust, lack of effectiveness of engagement, participants' inability (or impossibility) to change and the lack of a cohesive partnership among partners. Despite these findings, the project increases carers' satisfaction, competence and trust in service providers by demonstrating the positive effects of co-production. CONCLUSIONS Our article confirms that co-creation and co-destruction processes may coexist. The role of researchers and service providers is to prevent or remedy co-destruction effects. To this end, we suggest that in co-production projects, more time should be spent co-assessing the project before, during and after the co-production process. This approach would facilitate the adoption of adjustment actions such as creating mutual trust through conviviality among participants and fostering collaborative research between academia and organisations that are not used to working together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niccolò Morelli
- School of Management, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Psychology, EngageMinds Hub Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano), Milan, Italy
| | - Guendalina Graffigna
- Department of Psychology, EngageMinds Hub Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milano), Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|