Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges

Stigma Reduction Via Brief Video Interventions: Comparing Presentations by an Actor Versus a Person With Lived Experience

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of two brief video interventions in reducing mental health-related stigma: one featuring a person with lived experience of mental illness, the other featuring an actor guided by focus groups of individuals with lived experience.

METHODS

Participants (N=1,216) ages 18-30 were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention groups viewed one of two 2-minute videos in which a young Black protagonist describes symptoms, struggles, and personal recovery related to schizophrenia. Five domains of stigma were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and a 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Stigma scores were lower across all five domains in both intervention groups (vs. control), and noninferiority analyses found no difference between the two videos (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study enhanced prior findings showing similar efficacy of the two videos and illustrated opportunities for people with mental illness to share their personal stories without public exposure.

Experiences of suicide survivors of sharing their stories about suicidality and overcoming a crisis in media and public talks: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Media stories of hope and recovery from suicidal ideation have been found to have a positive impact on the audience, but little is known about how individuals who share their own experiences perceive the effects of their storytelling. This study aimed to assess qualitatively, through focus groups, how individuals who shared their personal story of hope and recovery in the media and public talks experienced the process, and which aspects they perceived as important in sharing their coping story.

METHODS

Three focus groups were conducted with a total of n = 12 individuals. These included n = 5 participants with experience of suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt, n = 4 individuals who had been bereaved through suicide, and n = 3 participants who experienced both. Participants were recruited from the American organisation "Suicide Survivors United". Thematic analysis was used to assess the participants' perception and experiences of sharing their story.

RESULTS

Participants shared that the intention to help others was the main motivation to share their story of hope and recovery. Participants noted many positive effects of their storytelling on themselves and also received positive feedback from the audience, such as improved help-seeking attitudes. The participants offered recommendations for those who want to share their story of hope and recovery, including careful personal preparation and media training before going public. They also discussed media recommendations for talking about suicide in the media.

CONCLUSIONS

Sharing a personal story of hope and recovery may have a beneficial impact on the storytellers. Storytelling requires a careful preparation and training before going public and support and guidance is crucial in all stages of the storytelling, particularly to help unexperienced storytellers in going public and using their personal narratives to help prevent suicide.

Blending Video Therapy and Digital Self-Help for Individuals With Suicidal Ideation: Intervention Design and a Qualitative Study Within the Development Process

BACKGROUND

Digital formats have the potential to enhance accessibility to care for individuals with suicidal ideation. However, digital self-help interventions have faced limitations, including small effect sizes in reducing suicidal ideation, low adherence, and safety concerns.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, we aimed to develop a remote blended cognitive behavioral therapy intervention that specifically targets suicidal ideation by blending video therapy with web-based self-help modules. The objective of this paper is to describe the collaborative development process and the resulting intervention and treatment rationale.

METHODS

First, we compiled intervention components from established treatment manuals designed for people with suicidal ideation or behavior, resulting in the development of 11 drafts of web-based modules. Second, we conducted a qualitative study, involving 5 licensed psychotherapists and 3 lay counselors specialized in individuals with suicidal ideation who reviewed these module drafts. Data were collected using the think-aloud method and semistructured interviews, and a qualitative content analysis was performed. The 4 a priori main categories of interest were blended care for individuals with suicidal ideation, contents of web-based modules, usability of modules, and layout. Subcategories emerged inductively from the interview transcripts. Finally, informed by previous treatment manuals and qualitative findings, we developed the remote blended treatment program.

RESULTS

The participants suggested that therapists should thoroughly prepare the web-based therapy with patients to tailor the therapy to each individual's needs. Participants emphasized that the web-based modules should explain concepts in a simple manner, convey empathy and validation, and include reminders for the safety plan. In addition, participants highlighted the need for a simple navigation and layout. Taking these recommendations into account, we developed a fully remote blended cognitive behavioral therapy intervention comprising 12 video therapy sessions and up to 31 web-based modules. The treatment involves collaboratively developing a personalized treatment plan to address individual suicidal drivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This remote treatment takes advantage of the high accessibility of digital formats while incorporating full sessions with a therapist. In a subsequent pilot trial, we will seek input from individuals with lived experience and therapists to test the feasibility of the treatment.

Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study

BACKGROUND

The importance and value of involvement of people with lived experience of suicide has been recognized in suicide research and prevention. Nonetheless, clear guidance on research collaboration and co-production is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by developing a set of guidelines on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide studies., i.e., conducting research with or by people with lived experience, rather than to, about or for them.

METHODS

The Delphi method was used to determine statements on best practice for the active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research. Statements were compiled through a systematic search of the scientific and grey literature, and reviewing qualitative data from a recent related study conducted by the authors. Two expert panels: people with lived experience of suicide (n = 44) and suicide researchers (n = 29) rated statements over three rounds of an online survey. Statements endorsed by at least 80% of panellists of each panel were included in the guidelines.

RESULTS

Panellists endorsed 96 out of 126 statements in 17 sections covering the full research cycle from deciding on the research question and securing funding, to conducting research and disseminating and implementing outcomes. Overall, there was a substantial level of agreement between the two panels regarding support from research institutions, collaboration and co-production, communication and shared decision making, conducting research, self-care, acknowledgment, and dissemination and implementation. However, panels also disagreed on specific statements regarding representativeness and diversity, managing expectations, time and budgeting, training, and self-disclosure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified consensus recommendations on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research, including co-production. Support from research institutions and funders, and training on co-production for researchers and people with lived experience, are needed for successful implementation and uptake of the guidelines.

Lived experience perspectives guiding improvements to the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality protocol

Background and aims

Suicide risk assessment protocols have traditionally been developed by clinical or research experts in suicidology, with little formal involvement of those with a lived experience of suicide. This study broadly aimed to seek lived experience perspectives of the Systematic Tailored Assessment for Responding to Suicidality (STARS) protocol A further aim was to elicit lived experience suggestions for wording and language used in the existing items within sections of the STARS protocol (STARS-p).

Method

Participants were 33 adults (Female = 64%) with a lived experience of suicide, who attended a virtual research workshop at the National Lived Experience of Suicide Summit (2021). After being educated about STARS-p, participants provided their overall perceptions of STARS-p as well as suggestions for rewording and language use across the sections of STARS-p. Their responses were gathered using a virtual online platform for live electronic data collection. A three-phase process of qualitative content analysis was used, engaging both inductive and deductive approaches to explore study aims one and two, respectively. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research was followed to enhance quality of reporting.

Results

Qualitative content analysis of participants' views of the STARS-p reflected three main categories, namely, STARS philosophy; What STARS aspires to; and Continuity of care and meeting needs. Responses characterized participants' perceptions of the core purpose of STARS-p and ways for refining or adapting it to suit diverse needs and settings. Based on deductive content analysis, suggested modifications to wording of items and additional items to extend sections were identified.

Conclusion

The study yielded novel perspectives from those with a lived experience of suicide, which will inform improvements to the next edition of STARS-p. The STARS training (required for licensed use of the protocol) will be updated accordingly, in line with these results.

Evaluation of an online suicide prevention program to improve suicide literacy and to reduce suicide stigma: A mixed methods study

Low-threshold e-health approaches in prevention to reduce suicide stigma are scarce. We developed an online program containing video reports on lived experience of suicide and evidence-based information on suicidality. We evaluated the program by a mixed methods design. We examined pre-post-changes of program completers (n = 268) in suicide literacy, suicide stigma (self and perceived), and self-efficacy expectation of being able to seek support in psychologically difficult situations using linear mixed models. To examine reported changes and helpful program elements 12-26 weeks after program completion, we content analyzed transcripts of telephone interviews (n = 16). Program completers showed more suicide literacy (Cohen's d = .74; p < .001), higher self-efficacy expectations to seek support (d = .09; p < .01), lower self-stigma (subscales glorification/normalization: d = -.13, p = .04; isolation/depression: d = -.14; p = .04; stigma: d = -.10; p = .07; n = 168) compared to baseline. We found no significant differences in perceived suicide stigma. We identified lived experience reports, the possibility of sharing own narrative on stigma and suicidality, and information on support as helpful elements. The current online program can increase suicide literacy and self-efficacy expectations to seek support and reduce self-stigma. We recommend a larger randomized controlled trial with longer follow-up to confirm these findings.

Entwicklung und psychometrische Überprüfung eines Kurzfragebogens zur Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung im Umgang mit psychisch belastenden Situationen (SWEP)

Ziel der Studie Entwicklung und psychometrische Überprüfung eines 6-Item-Instruments zur Erfassung von Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, sich in psychisch belastenden Situationen Unterstützung suchen zu können (SWEP).

Methodik Entwicklung von Items, Ermittlung von Verteilungscharakteristika, Faktorenstruktur und interner Konsistenz der Skala anhand einer Paper-Pencil-Befragung (N=269) und einer Untersuchung einer Online-Intervention zur Suizidprävention (N=802). Bestimmung der Retest-Reliabilität und diskriminanten Validität zu Skalen, die suizidspezifisches Wissen und einen Aspekt von Suizidstigma erfassten.

Ergebnisse Die Hauptkomponentenanalyse ergab für die SWEP-Skala ein eindimensionales Konstrukt mit hoher interner Konsistenz (Cronbachs α=0,83 bzw. α=0,89). Es zeigten sich inhaltlich plausible Korrelationen zu anderen Konstrukten und erste Hinweise auf eine hohe Retest-Reliabilität.

Schlussfolgerung Die SWEP-Skala ist ein reliables, augenscheinlich valides, kurzes Instrument zur Erfassung von Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, sich in psychisch belastenden Situationen Unterstützung suchen zu können.

Assessment and care of individuals at risk of suicide in Emergency Department: The SecUrgence protocol

Almost half (48,5%) of all individuals who die by suicide visited the Emergency Department (ED) in the year preceding their death by suicide and for almost a third (29,5%) of these individuals, the ED visit occurred within the month preceding their death by suicide. The ED is a key location for suicide prevention. The aim of this study was to develop and reach a consensus on the SecUrgence Protocol, a clinical protocol that intends to assess and provide care for individuals at risk of suicide that present themselves to the ED. This project was conducted in 3 stages: 1) Review of the literature, 2) Development of the list of the protocol statements by a first panel of experts, and 3) Validation, using the Delphi consensus method, on the final statements to include in the SecUrgence Protocol by a second panel of experts. Two rounds of the Delphi questionnaire were conducted until a final consensus of over 75% was reached. The SecUrgence Protocol is a first scientific step towards improving suicide prevention in the ED in Quebec as it was validated by a rigorous research process that included a consensus by all key stakeholders.

[Development of an online intervention on suicidality-providing knowledge and reducing suicide stigma]

Bei Suizidalität können die Angst, von anderen stigmatisiert zu werden, sowie Selbststigmatisierung und unzureichende Informationen dazu führen, dass Hilfsangebote weniger oder gar nicht in Anspruch genommen werden. E‑Mental-Health-Interventionen sind eine Möglichkeit, niederschwellig viele Betroffene über die Thematik zu informieren und auf persönliche Hilfsangebote vorzubereiten. Am Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf wurde eine komplexe Intervention entwickelt, gefördert im Rahmen des Förderschwerpunkts „Suizidprävention (A: Entstigmatisierung)“ des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit. Entwicklung und Inhalte dieser Onlineintervention sollen im vorliegenden Beitrag beschrieben werden.

Nach einer repräsentativen Telefonbefragung der deutschen Allgemeinbevölkerung, mit der Wissenslücken und Stigmatisierungstendenzen zum Thema Suizid untersucht wurden, entstand auf Basis eines australischen Suizidpräventionsprojekts und in Zusammenarbeit mit Betroffenen und Angehörigen die Onlineintervention „8 Leben – Erfahrungsberichte und Wissenswertes zum Thema Suizid“. Darin wurden sowohl wissenschaftlich-klinische Fakten rund um das Thema Suizidalität als auch eine gesellschaftlich-kulturelle Perspektive beleuchtet sowie auf Selbsthilfemöglichkeiten und professionelle Hilfsangebote verwiesen. Es wurden Videoerfahrungsberichte von Betroffenen und Angehörigen gezeigt. Aktuell wird das Projekt ausgewertet. Eine Weiterführung ist geplant.

In der Intervention werden verschiedene Sichtweisen gezeigt und die Personen, die die Intervention in Anspruch nehmen, werden sowohl auf kognitiver als auch auf emotionaler Ebene angesprochen. Aufgrund der Prävalenz von Suizidalität und der dennoch bestehenden Tabuisierung des Themas scheinen seriöse, evidenzbasierte und niedrigschwellige Präventions- und Informationsangebote besonders relevant.