1
|
Jenkinson PM, Fotopoulou A, Ibañez A, Rossell S. Interoception in anxiety, depression, and psychosis: a review. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 73:102673. [PMID: 38873633 PMCID: PMC11169962 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Research has examined the relationship between interoception and anxiety, depression, and psychosis; however, it is unclear which aspects of interoception have been systematically examined, what the combined findings are, and which areas require further research. To answer these questions, we systematically searched and narratively synthesised relevant reviews, meta-analyses, and theory papers (total n = 34). Existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (anxiety n = 2; depression n = 2; psychosis n = 0), focus on cardiac interoceptive accuracy (heartbeat perception), and indicate that heartbeat perception is not systematically impaired in anxiety or depression. Heartbeat perception might be poorer in people with psychosis, but further evidence is needed. Other aspects of interoception, such as different body systems and processing levels, have been studied but not systematically reviewed. We highlight studies examining these alternative bodily domains and levels, review the efficacy of interoception-based psychological interventions, and make suggestions for future research. Funding Wellcome Trust UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Jenkinson
- Faculty of Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, The Cairnmillar Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aikaterini Fotopoulou
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Agustin Ibañez
- School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Susan Rossell
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pryjmachuk S, Kirk S, Fraser C, Evans N, Lane R, Neill L, Camacho E, Bower P, Bee P, McDougall T. Service design for children and young people with common mental health problems: literature review, service mapping and collective case study. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-181. [PMID: 38767587 DOI: 10.3310/dkrt6293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Background The mental health of children/young people is a growing concern internationally. Numerous reports and reviews have consistently described United Kingdom children's mental health services as fragmented, variable, inaccessible and lacking an evidence base. Little is known about the effectiveness of, and implementation complexities associated with, service models for children/young people experiencing 'common' mental health problems like anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and self-harm. Aim To develop a model for high-quality service design for children/young people experiencing common mental health problems by identifying available services, barriers and enablers to access, and the effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of such services. Design Evidence syntheses with primary research, using a sequential, mixed-methods design. Inter-related scoping and integrative reviews were conducted alongside a map of relevant services across England and Wales, followed by a collective case study of English and Welsh services. Setting Global (systematic reviews); England and Wales (service map; case study). Data sources Literature reviews: relevant bibliographic databases and grey literature. Service map: online survey and offline desk research. Case study: 108 participants (41 children/young people, 26 parents, 41 staff) across nine case study sites. Methods A single literature search informed both reviews. The service map was obtained from an online survey and internet searches. Case study sites were sampled from the service map; because of coronavirus disease 2019, case study data were collected remotely. 'Young co-researchers' assisted with case study data collection. The integrative review and case study data were synthesised using the 'weaving' approach of 'integration through narrative'. Results A service model typology was derived from the scoping review. The integrative review found effectiveness evidence for collaborative care, outreach approaches, brief intervention services and the 'availability, responsiveness and continuity' framework. There was cost-effectiveness evidence only for collaborative care. No service model appeared to be more acceptable than others. The service map identified 154 English and Welsh services. Three themes emerged from the case study data: 'pathways to support'; 'service engagement'; and 'learning and understanding'. The integrative review and case study data were synthesised into a coproduced model of high-quality service provision for children/young people experiencing common mental health problems. Limitations Defining 'service model' was a challenge. Some service initiatives were too new to have filtered through into the literature or service map. Coronavirus disease 2019 brought about a surge in remote/digital services which were under-represented in the literature. A dearth of relevant studies meant few cost-effectiveness conclusions could be drawn. Conclusions There was no strong evidence to suggest any existing service model was better than another. Instead, we developed a coproduced, evidence-based model that incorporates the fundamental components necessary for high-quality children's mental health services and which has utility for policy, practice and research. Future work Future work should focus on: the potential of our model to assist in designing, delivering and auditing children's mental health services; reasons for non-engagement in services; the cost effectiveness of different approaches in children's mental health; the advantages/disadvantages of digital/remote platforms in delivering services; understanding how and what the statutory sector might learn from the non-statutory sector regarding choice, personalisation and flexibility. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018106219. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/09/08) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 13. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Pryjmachuk
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Kirk
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Fraser
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| | - Nicola Evans
- School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Rhiannon Lane
- School of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Camacho
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| | - Tim McDougall
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bowness B, Henderson C, Akhter Khan SC, Akiba M, Lawrence V. Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13940. [PMID: 39102730 PMCID: PMC10734554 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research-based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors. METHODS A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand-searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted. FINDINGS A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances. CONCLUSION By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryher Bowness
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Claire Henderson
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | | | - Mia Akiba
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blackburn S, Hine R, Fairbanks S, Parkes P, Murinas D, Meakin A, Taylor R, Parton L, Jones M, Tunmore J, Lench J, Evans N, Lewney K, O'Mara L, Fryer AA. The INSIGHT project: reflections on the co-production of a quality recognition programme to showcase excellence in public involvement in health and care research. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:99. [PMID: 37880805 PMCID: PMC10601214 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00508-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in healthcare research varies considerably and is frequently tokenistic. We aimed to co-produce the Insight | Public Involvement Quality Recognition and Awards programme, based on the UK Standards for Public Involvement (UKSPI) alongside an incremental scale designed by Expert Citizens (a lived experience-led community group), to incentivise and celebrate continuous improvement in PPI. METHODS We used Task and Finish Groups (19/44 [43%] public contributor membership) to co-produce the programme which we piloted in three organisations with different healthcare research models. We used surveys and review sessions to capture learning and reflections. RESULTS We co-created: (1) A Quality descriptor matrix comprising four incremental quality levels (Welcoming, Listening, Learning, Leading) for each UKSPI standard. (2) An assessment framework including guidance materials, self-assessment form and final report template. (3) An assessor training package. (4) The quality awards event format and nomination form. These materials were modified based on pilot-site feedback. Of survey respondents: 94.4% felt they had made at least 'Some' personal contribution (half said 'Quite a lot'/'A great deal'), 88.9% said they were 'Always'/'Often' able to express their views freely and, 100% stated the programme would have 'A lot of impact'/'Quite a bit of impact'. During the project, we identified the importance of taking time to explain project aims and contributor roles, adapting to the needs of individual contributors and, using smaller bespoke sessions outside the main Task and Finish Groups. CONCLUSIONS We co-produced and piloted a quality recognition programme to incentivise and celebrate continuous quality improvement in PPI. One public contributor stated, "I feel strongly that the Insight framework and awards will raise awareness of the [public involvement] work going on in many community settings. [It] is likely to result in better sharing of positive practice, incentivising research groups of any size to start work or to improve the quality of [PPI] could be one of the main benefits. I'm excited that if this initiative takes off, regionally and then in the longer term nationally, it could be a significant step in advancing the [public] voice."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Blackburn
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rachele Hine
- Expert Citizens CIC, The Dudson Centre, Hanley, Staffordshire, UK
| | | | - Phillip Parkes
- Expert Citizens CIC, The Dudson Centre, Hanley, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Darren Murinas
- Expert Citizens CIC, The Dudson Centre, Hanley, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Andrew Meakin
- Expert Citizens CIC, The Dudson Centre, Hanley, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Robert Taylor
- Research User Group, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Linda Parton
- Research User Group, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | | | - Jessica Tunmore
- Research and Innovation Department, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, St George's Hospital, Stafford, UK
| | - Jennifer Lench
- Research and Innovation Department, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, St George's Hospital, Stafford, UK
| | - Nicola Evans
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Katharine Lewney
- Directorate of Research and Innovation and Centre for NMAHP Research and Education Excellence (CeNREE), University Hospitals of North Midlands, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Lucy O'Mara
- Directorate of Research and Innovation and Centre for NMAHP Research and Education Excellence (CeNREE), University Hospitals of North Midlands, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Anthony A Fryer
- Impact Accelerator Unit, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spencer B, Hugh-Jones S, Cottrell D, Pini S. The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:91. [PMID: 37828630 PMCID: PMC10568929 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence suggests resources and services benefit from being developed in collaboration with the young people they aim to support. Despite this, patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) with young people is often tokenistic, limited in engagement and not developmentally tailored to young people. Our paper aims to build knowledge and practice for meaningfully engaging with young people in research design, analysis and as research participants. METHODS We report the participatory processes from the INSCHOOL project, examining long-term health conditions and schooling among 11-18 year olds. Young people were consulted at the inception of the project through a hospital-based youth forum. This began a partnership where young people co-designed study documents, informed the recruitment process, developed creative approaches to data collection, participated in pilot interviews, co-analysed the qualitative data and co-presented results. RESULTS PPIE advisors, participants and researchers all benefitted from consistent involvement of young people throughout the project. Long-term engagement allowed advisors and researchers to build rapport and facilitated openness in sharing perspectives. PPIE advisors valued being able to shape the initial aims and language of the research questions, and contribute to every subsequent stage of the project. Advisors co-designed flexible data collection methods for the qualitative project that provided participants with choices in how they took part (interviews, focus groups, written tasks). Further choice was offered through co-designed preparation activities where participants completed one of four creative activities prior to the interview. Participants were therefore able to have control over how they participated and how they described their school experiences. Through participatory analysis meetings advisors used their first-hand experiences to inform the creation of themes and the language used to describe these themes. PPIE in every stage of the process helped researchers to keep the results grounded in young people's experience and challenge their assumptions as adults. CONCLUSIONS Young people have much to offer and the INSCHOOL project has shown that researchers can meaningfully involve young people in all aspects of research. Consistent PPIE resulted in a project where the voices of young people were prioritised throughout and power imbalances were reduced, leading to meaningful participant-centred data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Spencer
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | | | - David Cottrell
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK
| | - Simon Pini
- University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rommerskirch-Manietta M, Manietta C, Hoffmann AL, Rohra H, Gove D, Alpers B, Hung L, Geary CR, Abbott KM, Ren LH, Oberfeld S, Diaz A, Roes M. Participatory development of a framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in conducting a systematic review: the DECIDE-SR protocol. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2023; 9:52. [PMID: 37434210 PMCID: PMC10337195 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-023-00461-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews summarize and evaluate relevant studies to contribute to evidence-based practice. Internationally, researchers have reached a consensus that the active involvement of the public leads to better research. Despite this agreement, there are many reviews of research concerning healthcare interventions intended to promote the care of people living with dementia and those from their social network (e.g., close contacts, both family and non-family members) primarily involve only healthcare professionals and other experts. Due to the lack of a dementia-sensitive framework to actively involve people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals as co-researchers in systematic reviews, it is important to develop a framework to inform practice. METHODS For this framework development process, we will recruit four people living with dementia and a total of four people from their social network, and three healthcare professionals working in acute or long-term care settings. We will conduct regular meetings with these groups of the public and healthcare professionals to include them in all stages of the systematic review. We will also identify and develop methods necessary to ensure meaningful involvement. The results will be documented and analyzed for the development of a framework. For the planning and preparation for these meetings, as well as the conduct of the meetings themselves, we will be guided by the principles of the INVOLVE approach. In addition, the ACTIVE framework will be used to guide the degree of involvement and the stage in the review process. DISCUSSION We assume that our transparent approach to the development of a framework to support the active involvement of people living with dementia and those from their social network, and healthcare professionals in systematic reviews will serve as an impetus for and provide guidance to other researchers with the goal of increasing researchers' focus on this topic and facilitating systematic reviews that apply participatory approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration is unnecessary as no intervention study will be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Rommerskirch-Manietta
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Christina Manietta
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Anna Louisa Hoffmann
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Helga Rohra
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Patient Advisory Board, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Birgit Alpers
- Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lillian Hung
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Katherine M. Abbott
- Department of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, USA
- Scripps Gerontology Center, Oxford, USA
| | - Lily Haopu Ren
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stefanie Oberfeld
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, St. Rochus-Hospital, Telgte, Germany
| | - Ana Diaz
- Alzheimer Europe, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Martina Roes
- Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Site Witten, Witten, Germany
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bennett C, Hannigan B, Elliott MB, Elliott M, Evans N, Fraser C, Hails E, Jones A, McMillan I, Pryjmachuk S, Sawle L, Vaughan R. Crisis care for children and young people with mental health problems: national mapping, models of delivery, sustainability and experience (CAMH-Crisis2). A study protocol. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:22. [PMID: 37881462 PMCID: PMC10593319 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13414.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background One in six five 16-year-olds have a probable mental health difficulty. Of these, almost half of older teenagers and a quarter of 11-16-year-olds report having self-harmed or attempted suicide. Currently, there is little research into mental health crisis services for young people, with little understanding of what services exist, who uses them, or what works best. Question 'How are mental health crisis responses for children and young people up to the age of 25 sustained, experienced and integrated within their local systems of services'? Objectives 1. To describe National Health Service (NHS), local authority, education and third sector approaches to the implementation and organisation of crisis care for children and young people across England and Wales. 2. To identify eight contrasting case studies in which to evaluate how crisis services have developed and are currently organised, sustained, experienced and integrated within the context of their local systems of services. 3. To compare and contrast these services in the context of the available international evidence, drawing out and disseminating clear implications for the design and delivery of future crisis responses for children and young people and their families. Methods A sequential mixed methods approach, underpinned by normalisation process theory will be employed. A survey will create a detailed record of how crisis responses across England and Wales are organised, implemented and used. Subsequently, eight contrasting services in relation to geographic and socioeconomic setting, populations served, and service configuration will be identified as case studies. Interviews will be conducted with children, young people and parents/carers who have used the service, as well as commissioners, managers and practitioners. Operational policies and service usage data will also be examined. Analysis of how each service is provided, experienced, implemented and sustained will be conducted both inductively and deductively, reflecting normalisation process theory constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Bennett
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK
| | - Ben Hannigan
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK
| | | | - Martin Elliott
- CASCADE School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nicola Evans
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK
| | - Claire Fraser
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Euan Hails
- NHS Wales Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, Wales, UK
| | - Aled Jones
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England, PL4 8AA, UK
| | | | - Steven Pryjmachuk
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Leanne Sawle
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, CF24 0AB, UK
| | - Rachael Vaughan
- CASCADE School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kirk S, Fraser C, Evans N, Lane R, Crooks J, Naughton G, Pryjmachuk S. Perceptions of the key components of effective, acceptable and accessible services for children and young people experiencing common mental health problems: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:391. [PMID: 37095463 PMCID: PMC10123588 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09300-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children and young people's (CYP) mental health is a major public health concern internationally and the recent Covid-19 pandemic has amplified these concerns. However, only a minority of CYP receive support from mental health services due to the attitudinal and structural barriers they and their families encounter. For over 20 years, report after report has consistently highlighted the shortcomings of mental health services for CYP in the United Kingdom and attempts to improve services have been largely unsuccessful. The findings reported in this paper are from a multi-stage study that aimed to develop a model of effective, high-quality service design for CYP experiencing common mental health problems. The aim of the stage reported here was to identify CYP's, parents' and service providers' perceptions of the effectiveness, acceptability and accessibility of services. METHODS Case studies were conducted of nine different services for CYP with common mental health problems in England and Wales. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with 41 young people, 26 parents and 41 practitioners and were analysed using the Framework approach. Patient and Public Involvement was integrated throughout the study with a group of young co-researchers participating in data collection and analysis. RESULTS Four key themes defined participants' perceptions of service effectiveness, acceptability and accessibility. Firstly, open access to support with participants highlighting the importance of self-referral, support at the point of need and service availability to CYP/parents. Secondly, the development of therapeutic relationships to promote service engagement which was based on assessment of practitioner's personal qualities, interpersonal skills and mental health expertise and underpinned by relational continuity. Thirdly, personalisation was viewed as promoting service appropriateness and effectiveness by ensuring support was tailored to the individual. Fourthly, the development of self-care skills and mental health literacy helped CYP/parents manage and improve their/their child's mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to knowledge by identifying four components that are perceived to be central to providing effective, acceptable and accessible mental health services for CYP with common mental health problems irrespective of service model or provider. These components could be used as the foundations for designing and improving services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Kirk
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Claire Fraser
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Nicola Evans
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Rhiannon Lane
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Jodie Crooks
- The McPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK
| | - Georgia Naughton
- The McPin Foundation, 7-14 Great Dover Street, London, SE1 4YR, UK
| | - Steven Pryjmachuk
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|