Mechanisms of sterile inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs: a narrative review

Acute Sterile Endophthalmitis Following Intravitreal Rituximab Injection in Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: Case Series

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE

To describe sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal rituximab (Rituxan, Genentech) injection for treatment of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS

Medical records of biopsy-proven VRL patients who received intravitreal rituximab (RTX) between January 2011 and December 2021 in Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan were reviewed. 3 patients presented with sterile endophthalmitis after the second dose of intravitreal RTX were included.Methods, Intervention, or Testing: Intravitreal methotrexate (400µg/0.1ml) and rituximab (1mg/0.1ml) injections given a week apart, monthly.Main Outcome Measures: Clinical presentation and response to treatment including visual acuity, degree of inflammation and intraocular pressure .

RESULTS

All cases had bilateral disease and received the first dose of intravitreal RTX without any side effects. All cases developed bilateral corneal edema with Descemet's folds, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior chamber and vitreous cells with hazy fundus view approximately within 1 week after the second RTX injection. Intraocular pressures were increased in Cases 2 and 3. Clinical findings improved to baseline with topical corticosteroid therapy within 1 month in all cases, and additional topical antiglaucomatous medication in Cases 2 and 3. Additionally, Case 1 received the third dose of RTX injection to the right eye 1 month after the second injection and repeating dense anterior chamber and vitreous cells developed in 1 day. Her vision decreased to counting fingers from 20/40, and intraocular pressure increased. After topical steroids and antiglaucomatous medications, her intraocular inflammation subsided. Her vision improved to 20/30, and intraocular pressure became normal in the right eye.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case series documenting sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal rituximab in vitreoretinal lymphoma. Recognition of sterile endophthalmitis is important in differentiating from vitreoretinal lymphoma recurrence and infectious endophthalmitis. Close observation and topical steroid drops seem to be effective.

Microglia in retinal angiogenesis and diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy has a high probability of causing visual impairment or blindness throughout the disease progression and is characterized by the growth of new blood vessels in the retina at an advanced, proliferative stage. Microglia are a resident immune population in the central nervous system, known to play a crucial role in regulating retinal angiogenesis in both physiological and pathological conditions, including diabetic retinopathy. Physiologically, they are located close to blood vessels and are essential for forming new blood vessels (neovascularization). In diabetic retinopathy, microglia become widely activated, showing a distinct polarization phenotype that leads to their accumulation around neovascular tufts. These activated microglia induce pathogenic angiogenesis through the secretion of various angiogenic factors and by regulating the status of endothelial cells. Interestingly, some subtypes of microglia simultaneously promote the regression of neovascularization tufts and normal angiogenesis in neovascularization lesions. Modulating the state of microglial activation to ameliorate neovascularization thus appears as a promising potential therapeutic approach for managing diabetic retinopathy.

A real-world data analysis of ocular adverse events linked to anti-VEGF drugs: a WHO-VigiAccess study

Introduction

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is key to wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). Anti-VEGF drugs are the main treatment in clinics. This study assessed ocular adverse events (AE) from anti-VEGF drugs in VigiAccess, WHO's database, and compared adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles of four drugs to aid personalized treatment choices for optimal benefit and safety.

Methods

The design was a descriptive retrospective study. We observed four anti-VEGF drugs commonly used in the clinical treatment of wAMD, and their ADR reports came from WHO-VigiAccess. The collected data included the age group, gender, and regional data, as well as the data of disease systems and symptoms caused by ADR recorded in the annual ADR reports and reports received by the WHO. We observed the overall characteristics of the ADR reports of these drugs, then explored the distribution of 27 SOCs of these drugs. Subsequently, we compared the most common ocular ADRs of the drugs. Finally, we compared the commonalities and differences of ocular ADRs related to the drugs.

Results

Overall, 57,779 AE associated with the four anti-VEGF drugs were reported. The results showed that the number of females experiencing ADRs (67.83%) was significantly higher than males (32.17%), the age group with the highest reported incidence was over 75 years old. More than half of the ADR reports came from the Americas (50.86%). The five most common types of AE were: eye disorders (43.56%), general disorders and administration site conditions (34.47%), injury poisoning and procedural complications (13.36%), infections and infestations (11.61%), nervous system disorders (9.99%). Compared with the other three inhibitors, brolucizumab had a significantly higher rate of ocular ADR reports. The most common ocular ADRs of these four anti-VEGF drugs were mostly related to visual impairment, vision blurred, and blindness. However, there is still a disparity of ADRs between different drugs.

Conclusion

The presence of ocular AEs when using anti-VEGF drugs to treat wAMD in clinical practice should attract clinical attention. Clinicians should use these expensive drugs more rationally based on the characteristics of ADRs and develop personalized treatment plans for patients.

Risk of post-injection endophthalmitis peaks within the first three injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A nationwide registry-based study

PURPOSE

To report the incidence of post-injection endophthalmitis (PIE) and the cumulative risk associated with repeated injections of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF).

METHODS

We employed nationwide registries in Denmark to include all individuals aged ≥40 years who received at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in 2007-2022. Our primary endpoint PIE was identified using specific diagnostic codes for endophthalmitis and procedure codes for vitreous biopsy within 10 days prior to and 120 days post-injection. Patients were stratified according to the underlying diagnoses for which they received the treatment. The relative risk (RR) for PIE was calculated between groups based on the number of injections received by the patients.

RESULTS

We identified 60 825 patients who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment during study time, with a median age of 77.2 years and females constituting 58.1%. We identified 232 cases of PIE after 1 051 549 injections during follow-up, resulting in an incidence of 0.022% [95% CI 0.019%-0.025%]. Despite a linear growth in annual anti-VEGF use, the incidence remained stable at 0.020% [95% CI 0.017%-0.023%] from 2013 to 2022. Compared to patients receiving 1-3 injections, RR for patients receiving 4-20, 21-40, and >40 injections were 0.46 [95% CI 0.34-0.63], 0.32 [95% CI 0.21-0.50], and 0.54 [95% CI 0.36-0.81], respectively. Findings were similar across the different diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on 16 years of nationwide registry data, this study identified a low and stable incidence of PIE. Notably, the highest risk of endophthalmitis was within the first three anti-VEGF injections.

[Vasculitis of the retina : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, management and treatment]

Inflammatory changes in the retinal vessels can be attributed to a wide range of etiologies. These include infections, intraocular and systemic autoimmune processes, general diseases and iatrogenic factors. As the endothelium of the retinal capillaries forms the inner blood-retinal barrier, a disruption of this structure is directly associated with consequences for the fluid electrolyte balance of the retina. Clinical sequelae can include leakage of the retinal vessels and macular edema, which are often functionally threatening and significantly reduce the quality of life of patients. As the eye can be affected as an "index organ", a work-up of the patient by the ophthalmologist is of great importance. In the age of "precision medicine", efforts are being made to gain new insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms of vasculitis through "omics" in order to develop innovative treatment concepts.

Clinical features, management, and outcomes of patients with sterile endophthalmitis associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection: retrospective case series

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical features, treatment protocol, outcomes, and complications that developed in this case series of 24 patients who had consecutive sterile endophthalmitis after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, IVB was repackaged in individual aliquots from the three batches that were used on the same day. IVB was injected into 26 eyes of 26 patients due to diabetic macular edema, age-related macular degeneration, and branch retinal vein occlusion. All patients had intraocular inflammation. Patients were divided into two groups severe and moderate inflammation according to the intraocular inflammation. The medical records of all patients were reviewed. At each follow-up visit, the complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, biomicroscopy, and posterior fundus examination.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 26 patients were included in the study. Two patients were excluded from this study since they didn't come to follow-up visits. The mean BCVA was 1.00 ± 0.52 Log MAR units before IVB. At the final visit, the BCVA was 1.04 ± 0.47 Log MAR units. These differences were not significant (p = 0.58). Of the 24 eyes, 16 eyes had severe, and 8 eyes had moderate intraocular inflammation. Eleven eyes in the severe inflammation group underwent pars plana vitrectomy due to intense vitreous opacity. Smear, culture results, and polymerase chain reaction results were negative.

CONCLUSION

Sterile endophthalmitis may occur after IVB injection. Differential diagnosis of sterile endophthalmitis from infective endophthalmitis is crucial to adjust the appropriate treatment and prevent long-term complications due to unnecessary treatment.

Acute Noninfectious Anterior Ocular Inflammation Following Ranibizumab Biosimilar Intravitreal Injection in a Patient With Recent COVID-19 Vaccination

Even in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, it is prudent to exercise caution regarding the timing between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and COVID-19 vaccinations, as ocular inflammation can occur following both procedures. However, this perspective has not been sufficiently discussed thus far. Herein, we report a case of acute noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab biosimilar (RBZ BS, Senju Pharmaceuticals, Japan) in a patient recently vaccinated against COVID-19. A 74-year-old male with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the left eye was treated with RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He received his fourth COVID-19 vaccination with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-1273 (Moderna) two days prior to his second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He reported no systemic symptoms associated with the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. The second RBZ BS intravitreal injection was safely performed without complications. However, a few hours later, he experienced blurred vision without ocular pain in his left eye, a symptom not observed after the first injection. He visited a local ophthalmologic clinic the following day and was subsequently referred to our hospital due to anterior ocular inflammation in the left eye. His vision in the left eye was 0.3 decimal best-corrected visual acuity. Examination revealed non-granulomatous anterior ocular inflammation with 3+ cells and 2+ flare in the left eye. Anterior vitreous inflammation, keratic precipitates, or conjunctivitis was absent. Fundus examination also showed no signs of posterior inflammation. Both fluorescence angiography and indocyanine green angiography revealed staining corresponding to CNV without retinal vasculature leakage. There is nothing abnormal with the right eye based on the examination. Given that the noninfectious ocular inflammation was likely, based on the acute onset of symptoms within less than 24 hours following the RBZ BS intravitreal injection, and the presence of non-granulomatous inflammation only in the anterior segment without ocular pain, betamethasone eye drops four times daily was initiated in the left eye on the first day following the second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. Then, his ocular inflammation improved to mild by the fourth day post-injection. His eye eventually cleared, with no cells or flare in the anterior chamber at five months. Eventually, given the clinical course of good response to only topical steroid therapy, the diagnosis of noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following RBZ BS in the case of a recent episode of COVID-19 vaccination was retrospectively confirmed. Although this case represents one of the initial instances of noninfectious ocular inflammation following RBZ BS (Senju Pharmaceuticals) administration, sterile ocular inflammation after other intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has already been well-reported. In addition, given the recent COVID-19 vaccination, the ocular inflammation might be influenced by the vaccination, synergistically leading to vaccine-associated uveitis with similar signs and symptoms. In conclusion, to prevent such a complex situation, it is advisable to consider an adequate interval between COVID-19 vaccination and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

[Translated article] Syringes for intraocular administration: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: (silicone) AND (syringes) AND ((intraocular) OR (intravitreal)) and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone; the administration technique; the physicochemical aspects of silicone release; and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialised syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding 2 that will probably be commercialised in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Syringes for intraocular administration: Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The off-label use in clinical practice of non-approved syringes for intravitreal drug administration has resulted in the detection of silicone oil drops in the vitreous of some patients. This situation derives from the lack of approved syringes for intraocular use in the Spanish market. The aim of this work is to review the use of syringes for intraocular administration, as well as to search for alternatives that meet the legal requirements for these unmet needs.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines by searching PubMed with the descriptors: "silicone" AND "syringes" AND ("intraocular" OR "intravitreal") and filtering all existing publications from January 2006 to December 2023, including all those articles dealing with silicone oil release in intravitreal injections and analysing the possible consequences.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight results were found, 23 of which were excluded because they did not deal with the subject under study, leaving a total of 45 articles for the systematic review. These were classified according to the conclusions obtained in 4 groups: the adverse reactions produced by silicone, the administration technique, the physicochemical aspects of silicone release, and the characteristics of the medical device. After reviewing the current manufacturers and technical data sheets of commercialized syringes, the existing syringes for this use have been collected, finding two that will probably be commercialized in Spain at the beginning of 2024: Zero Residual™ 0.2 ml SiO-free and VitreJect® Ophthalmic.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results obtained, it can be interpreted that the use of syringes and needles with silicone for intravitreal use is a concern for health professionals due to the implications and consequences that may arise in patients, the most important being adverse reactions, so it is necessary to have silicone-free syringes on the market that are specific for intraocular use. Safety and legality in the use of intraocular syringes and needles is essential to guarantee ocular integrity and patient health.

Visual outcomes of intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab injection in Japanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

This study investigates the visual outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients who developed intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal brolucizumab injection (IVBr).

METHODS

We studied 285 eyes of 279 cases diagnosed with nAMD and focused on 18 eyes (6.3%) of 17 cases which developed IOI after IVBr. IVBr was performed either on the initial treatment or for switching of other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents during January 2020 to December 2021. We evaluated clinical features and the course of treatment of a 6-month follow-up after IOI occurred.

RESULTS

Of 17 cases, 9 cases were male, 8 cases were female. Baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.36, BCVA before IOI occurred was 0.30, and BCVA when IOI occurred was 0.43. 16 eyes (88.9%) had symptoms such as visual loss or floaters when IOI occurred. On the other hand, the remaining 2 eyes (11.1%) had no symptoms. 11 eyes (61.1%) had only IOI, while the remaining 7 eyes (38.9%) had IOI and perivascular sheathing. Steroid sub-tenon injection was performed on 1 eye (5.6%), steroid eye drops were used in 11 eyes (61.1%), and 6 eyes (33.3%) were followed-up without treatment. Neovascular AMD recurred in 16 eyes (88.9%) after IOI occurred and were treated with aflibercept. VA at 3 and 6 months after IOI occurred were significantly improved to 0.34 and 0.30, respectively (P = 0.09 at 3 months and P = 0.02 at 6 months). The symptoms of patients were improved in all cases. We were able to stop steroid treatment in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

IOI occurred in 6.3% of nAMD patients after IVBr treatment. All of which showed significant improvement from logMAR of 0.43 to 0.30 with steroid treatment or without any treatment. We should consider the possibility of IOI after IVBr as a complication, however, they have a relatively good prognosis if treated at an early stage.

Mimickers of anterior uveitis, scleritis and misdiagnoses- tips and tricks for the cornea specialist

BACKGROUND

Anterior uveitis, inflammation of the anterior chamber and related structures, is a cohort of diseases that can present to almost any general or sub-specialty Ophthalmology practice. Its features classically involve anterior chamber cell and flare. Below the surface of these two signs exist a panoply of diagnoses. BODY: The purpose of this review is to provide a general framework for diagnoses of anterior uveitis that are often missed as well as non-uveitic pathologies that often mimic anterior uveitis. Diagnostic deviation in either direction can have vision-threatening and rarely life-threatening consequences for patients. Using a comprehensive literature review we have collected a broad spectrum of etiologies of anterior uveitis that are easily missed and non-uveitic pathologies that can masquerade as anterior uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a focused review on specific misdiagnosed anterior uveitis pathologies and some of the conditions that can masquerade as anterior uveitis and scleritis.

Severe Intraocular Inflammation Following Intravitreal Faricimab

Importance

Monitoring for and reporting potential cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in clinical practice despite limited occurrences in clinical trials, including experiences with relatively new intravitreal agents, such as brolucizumab, pegcetacoplan, or faricimab, helps balance potential benefits and risks of these agents.

Objective

To provide descriptions of 3 initially culture-negative cases of acute, severe, posterior-segment IOI events occurring within the same month following intravitreal faricimab injections at a single institution.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this case series, 3 patients manifesting acute, severe IOI following intravitreal injection of faricimab were identified between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023.

Exposure

Faricimab, 6 mg (0.05 mL of 120 mg/mL solution), for neovascular age-related macular degeneration among patients previously treated with aflibercept; 1 patient also had prior exposure to bevacizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Visual acuity, vitreous taps for bacterial or fungal cultures, and retinal imaging.

Results

All 3 patients received intravitreal faricimab injections between September 20 and October 20, 2023, from 2 different lot numbers (expiration dates, July 2025) at 3 locations of 1 institution among 3 of 19 retina physicians. Visual acuities with correction were 20/63 OS for patient 1, 20/40 OD for patient 2, and 20/20 OS for patient 3 prior to injection. All 3 patients developed acute, severe inflammation involving the anterior and posterior segment within 3 to 4 days after injection, with visual acuities of hand motion OS, counting fingers OD, and hand motion OS, respectively. Two patients were continuing faricimab treatment while 1 patient was initiating faricimab treatment. All received intravitreal ceftazidime, 2.2 mg/0.1 mL, and vancomycin, 1 mg/0.1 mL, immediately following vitreous taps. All vitreous tap culture results were negative. One patient underwent vitrectomy 1 day following presentation. Intraoperative vitreous culture grew 1 colony of Staphylococcus epidermidis, judged a likely contaminant by infectious disease specialists. All symptoms resolved within 1 month; visual acuities with correction were 20/100 OS for patient 1, 20/50 OD for patient 2, and 20/30 OS for patient 3.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, 3 patients with acute, severe IOI within 1 month at 3 different locations among 3 ophthalmologists of 1 institution following intravitreal faricimab could represent some unknown storage or handling problem. However, this cluster suggests such inflammatory events may be more common than anticipated from faricimab trial reports, emphasizing the continued need for vigilance to detect and report such cases following regulatory approval.

Vitreous Opacity Following Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection: A Case Series Review

PURPOSE

To investigate cases of vitreous opacity (VO) similar to asteroid hyalosis (AH) after intravitreal brolucizumab injection.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases showing VO similar to AH among patients who received intravitreal brolucizumab injections at our retinal clinic from January 2022 to January 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 220 brolucizumab injections were administered at our hospital. VO, showing yellow-white brilliant reflective particles, was found in six patients (2.7%). When VO occurred, all patients complained of floaters, although none of them complained of other symptoms including decreased visual acuity, pain, or conjunctival redness. The mean number of brolucizumab injections was 2.57 ± 2.38. No significant visual impairment was observed while VO was present. VO improved in all cases, and four cases improved without any treatment. The mean interval from onset to disappearance of VO was 8.0 ± 3.1 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

VO, similar to AH, can occur with a relatively high probability after intravitreal brolucizumab injections. Patients complained of severe floaters, but VO was not accompanied by other symptoms including vision impairment, injection, and pain. The VO disappeared after approximately 4 to 14 weeks. In case that other inflammatory findings are not severe, close follow-up without treatment may be sufficient. If a patient complains of floaters after an intravitreal brolucizumab injection, close fundus observation is necessary to evaluate the VO.

Immunogenicity and Potential for Intraocular Inflammation of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Drugs

Background

Concerns of intraocular inflammation associated with intravitreal administration of anti-VEGF drugs have been risen and the exact mechanism is not yet elucidated.

Objective

To explore the relationship between immunogenicity and intraocular inflammation in intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Methods

This review examines the immunogenicity of individual intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs and their potential link to intraocular inflammation.

Results

We suggest that the main cause of intraocular inflammation is the presence of pre-existing and treatment-induced antidrug antibodies, along with considerations related to the molecular structure, which includes the drug's format and size.

Conclusions

Researchers and clinicians involved in the advancement of new anti-VEGF drugs should take into consideration the factors related to intraocular inflammation that have been discussed.

Laser flare photometry in eyes receiving brolucizumab intravitreal injections for age related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To measure aqueous flare levels in treatment naïve eyes suffering from wet age- related macular degeneration (wAMD) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab.

METHODS

Patients with treatment naïve wAMD in one eye were prospectively enrolled. Flare levels were measured with laser flare photometry at baseline, 1 day and 1 month after each of the 3 monthly injections during the loading phase.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients aged 76.7 ± 6.0 years were enrolled. Flare values were 10.6 ± 3.7 photons/msec at baseline and 12.6 ± 5.8 photons/msec at the last follow up visit, 1 month after the third injection (p = 0.289, repeated measures ANOVA). The mean change in flare after the first injection was 4.2 ± 3.6. photons/msec, 6.6 ± 8.9 photons/msec after the 2nd and 8.6 ± 20.8 photons/msec after the 3rd injection (p = 0.640, repeated measures ANOVA). No patient had clinical signs of intraocular inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes receiving brolucizumab injections for wAMD showed similar flare at baseline, during and 1 month after completion of three-monthly intravitreal injections. There was no evidence of subclinical inflammation during the loading phase of brolucizumab based on laser flare photometry measurements.

A New Generation of Gene Therapies as the Future of Wet AMD Treatment

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is an eye disease and the most common cause of vision loss in the Western World. In its advanced stage, AMD occurs in two clinically distinguished forms, dry and wet, but only wet AMD is treatable. However, the treatment based on repeated injections with vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) antagonists may at best stop the disease progression and prevent or delay vision loss but without an improvement of visual dysfunction. Moreover, it is a serious mental and financial burden for patients and may be linked with some complications. The recent first success of intravitreal gene therapy with ADVM-022, which transformed retinal cells to continuous production of aflibercept, a VEGF antagonist, after a single injection, has opened a revolutionary perspective in wet AMD treatment. Promising results obtained so far in other ongoing clinical trials support this perspective. In this narrative/hypothesis review, we present basic information on wet AMD pathogenesis and treatment, the concept of gene therapy in retinal diseases, update evidence on completed and ongoing clinical trials with gene therapy for wet AMD, and perspectives on the progress to the clinic of "one and done" therapy for wet AMD to replace a lifetime of injections. Gene editing targeting the VEGFA gene is also presented as another gene therapy strategy to improve wet AMD management.

Thermal imaging of local skin temperature as part of quality and safety assessment of injectable drugs

Injection of high-quality drugs can occasionally cause unexpected and unexplained local complications. As the current standard for drug quality control does not include an assessment of the local irritation effects of drugs, this effect may cause postinjection complications. Simultaneously, local irritation effects of the drugs can be assessed based on local tissue inflammation. The dynamics of local temperature can assess inflammation. Infrared monitoring of local skin temperature dynamics at subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous injection sites of drugs under experimental and clinical conditions can improve their quality and safety. Therefore, there is a need to include dynamic thermography in the standard of biological evaluation of the quality and safety of drugs in the dosage form "solution for injections." This eliminates the local irritation and necrotizing activity of drugs and minimizes the development of local pain syndrome, aseptic inflammation, necrosis, and abscess.

Anti-complement drugs for the treatment of geographic atrophy and the release of silicone oil

Intravitreal injections are a common procedure in ophthalmology, often using syringes coated with silicone to aid piston movement and needles coated with silicone oil to facilitate penetration of the sclera. Pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol, recently approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration, have higher viscosity and seem more susceptible to entrap air bubbles compared to anti-VEGF drugs.It is plausible that both anti-complement drugs could be associated with a higher likelihood of introducing silicone oil in the vitreous because of higher viscosity, with potentially higher friction at the inner surface of syringe barrel, in the vicinity of silicone oil. In addition to this, undesirable agitation might be inadvertently promoted by some retina specialists to remove air bubbles from the drug solution.In conclusion, recent reports of silicone oil droplets in the vitreous of patients receiving pegcetacoplan injection might be related to both its viscosity and to agitation of the syringe to remove air bubbles. Since avacincaptad pegol also is viscous, though with different pH, syringe and filter needle, we might expect similar reports for this agent soon. We also recommend further studies be carried not only to clarify the current matter but also the potential association between the combination of agitation, silicone oil and inflammation or any immune response.

Factors Associated With Intraocular Inflammation in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients Treated With Brolucizumab

Purpose

To identify factors associated with intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with brolucizumab.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we collected aqueous humor samples from 96 eyes of 96 patients receiving treatment with brolucizumab; IOI subsequently developed in 19 eyes of 19 patients. To identify cytokines upregulated in eyes with subsequent development of IOI, we compared the aqueous humor cytokine levels between the IOI and non-IOI groups. We also collected plasma from 20 patients who developed IOI and 20 age- and sex-matched controls to identify differences in plasma biomarkers and the subfraction of CD4+ cells. Using stepwise variable selection and multivariate binary regression analysis, we developed an algorithm that accurately assessed the likelihood of IOI occurrence.

Results

The IOI group showed elevated aqueous humor levels of P-selectin (584 vs. 324 pg/mL, P = 0.013), TNF-α (0.89 vs. 0.60 pg/mL, P = 0.018), and IL-1α (2.0 vs. 1.4 pg/mL, P = 0.035) compared with the non-IOI group. Serum MMP-9 concentrations were higher in the IOI group than the non-IOI group (18,310 vs. 13,450 pg/mL, P = 0.029). Furthermore, the percentage of Th2 cells was significantly decreased in the IOI compared with the non-IOI group (3.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.013). The receiver operating characteristic curves for the optimal models showed an area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.89, indicating good performance.

Conclusions

The combination of elevated concentrations of multiple aqueous humor cytokines and of serum MMP-9 and a lower number of plasma Th2 cells is associated with brolucizumab-related IOI in patients with nAMD.

Method to Regulate Monocyte Function by Silencing HIF-1α mRNA in a Model of Retinal Neovascularization

Circulating monocytes migrate into the retina in response to inflammation and neovascularization. Furthermore, under inflammatory conditions such as diabetes, healthy monocytes become activated in the circulation. However, the contribution of activated monocytes to neovascularization is largely unknown. HIF-1α has been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of neovascularization. We describe here the synthesis of a hybrid nanomaterial for targeted delivery and gene silencing in activated monocytes that are associated with pathological neovascularization. To test the gene silencing ability of AS-shRNA-lipids in vitro, we used the probe to inhibit HIF-1α mRNA induced in mouse monocytes by exposing them to hypoxia. In addition, we tested AS-shRNA-lipids for inhibition of neovascularization in vivo using the mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR). Significant reduction of neovascularization was achieved in mouse OIR by targeting activated monocytes using intraperitoneal injections of AS-shRNA-lipids. Expression of HIF-1α and CD14 mRNA were both inhibited in circulating cells, suggesting normalization of the activated monocytes in P17 OIR animals treated with AS-shRNA-lipids. We hypothesized that inhibition of HIF-1α mRNA in activated monocytes may have a direct impact on VEGF expression in the retinal tissues in vivo. We observed that VEGF mRNA expression was inhibited in P17 retinal tissues after systemic treatment with HIF-1α-targeted AS-shRNA-lipids. These findings may provide a framework for a strategy to inhibit retinal neovascularization by targeting circulating activated monocytes.

Uveitis Following Intravitreal Injections of Faricimab: A Case Report

PURPOSE

Faricimab, a novel pharmaceutical agent targeting both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A pathways, has gained approval for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema. While clinical trials have demonstrated its favorable safety profile, this research presents two cases of hypertensive uveitis following intravitreal Faricimab injections.

METHODS

Medical history, clinical findings and multimodal images were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

The patients experienced elevated intraocular pressure, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior and posterior segment inflammation shortly after faricimab administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases prompt further investigation into the potential risk of uveitis associated with faricimab and underscore the importance of continued monitoring and research to elucidate its real-world safety profile.

Morganella morganii and Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection

BACKGROUND

Endophthalmitis following intravitreal injection is a potentially devastating complication of anti-VEGF injections. Post-injection endophthalmitis due to Enterococcus faecalis is rare, and no previous case of Morganella morganii endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection has been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the first reported case of Morganella morganii and Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection in an immunocompetent patient in the absence of recent ocular surgery. Our patient presented with hand movement visual acuity one day after anti-VEGF injection and demonstrated no clinical improvement despite repeated intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin injections. A decision was made to proceed with early vitrectomy given failure of intravitreal antibiotics. Visual acuity improved to 6/90 at 12 weeks after vitrectomy without any evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-injection endophthalmitis due to concurrent Morganella morganii and Enterococcus faecalis infections can have visually devastating consequences despite repeated empirical and targeted intravitreal antibiotics. Lack of clinical improvement following intravitreal antibiotics should warrant consideration of early vitrectomy. Our experience is a pertinent reminder of the ever-growing threat of uncommon and multi-resistant bacteria that must be considered when treating infections such as post-injection endophthalmitis.

Pharmaceutical compounding and storage of faricimab in a syringe for intravitreal injection do not impair stability and bi-specific binding properties

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal injection (IVI) of antibody biologics is a key treatment approach in ophthalmology. Pharmaceutical compounding and storage of prefilled syringes for IVI must take place without impairing the structure and function of the biologics. This study investigated the effect of withdrawing and storing the therapeutic antibody faricimab (Vabysmo, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in the Zero Residual silicone oil-free, 0.2-mL syringe (SJJ Solutions, The Hague, the Netherlands).

METHODS

To assess the effect of syringe withdrawal on faricimab, we compared samples from syringes prepared at day 0 with samples taken directly from faricimab vials. To assess the effect of syringe storage on faricimab, we kept prefilled syringes in the dark at 4 oC for 7, 14, or 37 days and compared samples from these syringes with day 0. We measured protein concentration (with spectrophotometry), stability and integrity (with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and melting temperature (Tm)), as well as binding of faricimab to its cognate antigens: vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) (with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)).

RESULTS

Faricimab migrated in line with its expected molecular mass under both reducing and non-reducing conditions for all time points when analyzed with SDS-PAGE, without any sign of degradation products or aggregation. The SEC elution profiles were identical for all time points. There were slight variations in Tm for different time points compared to day 0 but without consistent relationship with storage time. ELISA did not detect differences in VEGF-A or Ang-2 binding between time points, and faricimab did not bind the neonatal Fc receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal and storage of faricimab in syringes for up to day 37 did not impair the structure and bi-specific binding properties of the therapeutic antibody.

Construction of an Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Diagnostic and Therapeutic Molecular Network Using Multi-Layer Network Analysis, a Fuzzy Logic Model, and Deep Learning Techniques: Are Retinal and Brain Neurodegenerative Disorders Related?

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of irreversible visual impairment in the elderly. The current management of nAMD is limited and involves regular intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). However, the effectiveness of these treatments is limited by overlapping and compensatory pathways leading to unresponsiveness to anti-VEGF treatments in a significant portion of nAMD patients. Therefore, a system view of pathways involved in pathophysiology of nAMD will have significant clinical value. The aim of this study was to identify proteins, miRNAs, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), various metabolites, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a significant role in the pathogenesis of nAMD. To accomplish this goal, we conducted a multi-layer network analysis, which identified 30 key genes, six miRNAs, and four lncRNAs. We also found three key metabolites that are common with AMD, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and schizophrenia. Moreover, we identified nine key SNPs and their related genes that are common among AMD, AD, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis (MS), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Thus, our findings suggest that there exists a connection between nAMD and the aforementioned neurodegenerative disorders. In addition, our study also demonstrates the effectiveness of using artificial intelligence, specifically the LSTM network, a fuzzy logic model, and genetic algorithms, to identify important metabolites in complex metabolic pathways to open new avenues for the design and/or repurposing of drugs for nAMD treatment.

Intravitreal Brolucizumab and Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab and aflibercept in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: In total, 62 treatment-naive PCV eyes (62 patients) treated with intravitreal brolucizumab or aflibercept were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received a monthly loading injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor for 3 months, followed by further injections as required. Visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between drugs after 12 months of treatment. Results: The improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after 12 months of treatment was not significantly different between the brolucizumab-treated (22 eyes) and aflibercept-treated groups (40 eyes). However, in the brolucizumab-treated group, there was a significantly greater decrease in central retinal thickness (172 vs. 147 μm; P = 0.031) and subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment (51 vs. 29 μm; P = 0.025). In addition, the regression rate of polypoidal lesions was significantly higher in the brolucizumab-treated group (77.3%, 17/22 eyes) than that in the aflibercept-treated group (45.0%, 18/40 eyes; P = 0.014). Sterile intraocular inflammation showing mild vitritis was observed in 1 of the 22 eyes (4.5%) of brolucizumab-treated patients. Conclusion: Intravitreal brolucizumab injections for PCV showed visual improvement comparable to that of aflibercept during the 12-month treatment period. However, brolucizumab was more effective than aflibercept for the regression of polypoidal lesions and caused a greater decrease in central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness.

In-depth comparison of Anc80L65 and AAV9 retinal targeting and characterization of cross-reactivity to multiple AAV serotypes in humans

Anc80L65 is a synthetic, ancestral adeno-associated virus that has high tropism toward retinal photoreceptors after subretinal injection in mice and non-human primates. We characterized, for the first time, the post-intravitreal cell-specific transduction profile of Anc80L65 compared with AAV9. Here we use Anc80L65 and AAV9 to intravitreally deliver a copy of the gene encoding GFP into WT C57Bl/6J mice. GFP expression was driven by one of two clinically relevant promoters, chicken β actin (CB) or truncated MECP2 (P546). After qualitative assessment of relative GFP expression, we found Anc80L65 and AAV9 to have similar transduction profiles. Through the development of a novel method for quantifying GFP-positive retinal cells, we found Anc80L65 to have higher tropism in Müller glia and AAV9 to have higher tropism in horizontal cells. In addition, we found P546 to promote GFP expression at a more moderate level compared with the high levels seen under the CB promoter. Finally, for the first time, we characterized Anc80L65 cross-reactivity in human sera; 83% of patients with AAV2 pre-existing antibodies were found to be seropositive for Anc80L65. This study demonstrates the expanded therapeutic applications of Anc80L65 to treat retinal disease and provides the first insights to Anc80L65 pre-existing immunity in humans.

Exogenous Endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

Exogenous endophthalmitis (ExE) results from microbial infection as a complication of ocular surgery, penetrating ocular trauma, and intraocular foreign bodies. We herein review the classification of ExE, etiological agents, differential diagnosis and therapeutic challenges.

METHODS

Narrative Literature Review.

RESULTS

Identification of the causative agent through ocular fluid analysis is central in the diagnostic work-up of ExE. Prompt intravitreal antimicrobial therapy is key to successful management of ExE and vitrectomy is essential in severe cases. In culture-negative cases, and in the presence of specific features, a diagnosis of sterile intraocular inflammation or toxic syndrome should be suspected.

CONCLUSION

Strict adherence to treatment guidelines may improve outcomes of ExE, however the ultimate prognosis, especially in severe cases, may depend more on the virulence of the causative organism and associated ocular complications. Accurate differential diagnosis and effective treatment are crucial elements in the management and prognosis of non-infectious masquerades of ExE.

Challenges in posterior uveitis-tips and tricks for the retina specialist

PURPOSE

Posterior uveitis is a common chorioretinal pathology affecting all ages worldwide and is a frequent reason for referral to the retina clinic. The spectrum of etiologies for uveitis is very broad and includes infectious and auto-immune diseases. Inflammation can be confined to the eye or may be a part of systemic disease. A useful outline is therefore proposed to aid in the correct diagnosis of these challenging entities. The situation is further complicated by the fact that many neoplastic conditions resemble features of posterior uveitis; they are known as "masqueraders of uveitis". Here, we summarize different posterior uveitides that present with rare findings, along with masqueraders that can be difficult to distinguish. These conditions pose a diagnostic dilemma resulting in delay in treatment because of diagnostic uncertainty.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed on the MEDLINE/PUBMED, EBSCO and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1985 to January 2022 for original studies and reviews of predetermined diagnoses that include posterior uveitic entities, panuveitis and masquerade syndromes.

RESULTS

We described conditions that can present as mimickers of posterior uveitis (i.e., immune check-points inhibitors and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis; leukemia and lymphoma associated posterior uveitis), inflammatory conditions that present as mimickers of retinal diseases (i.e., Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus; central serous chorioretinopathy masquerading inflammatory exudative retinal detachment), and uveitic conditions with rare and diagnostically challenging etiologies (i.e., paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti-TNF-α; post vaccination uveitis; ocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs).

CONCLUSION

This review of unique posterior uveitis cases highlights the overlapping features of posterior uveitis (paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti -TNF α and uveitis; Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, …) and the nature of retinal conditions (ischemic ocular syndrome, or central retinal vein occlusion, amyloidosis, inherited conditions like retinitis pigmentosa, autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV), etc.…) that may mimic them is represented. Careful review of past uveitis history, current medications and recent vaccinations, detailed examination of signs of past or present inflammation, eventually genetic testing and/ or multimodal retinal imaging (like fluorescein angiography, EDI-OCT, OCT-angiography for lupus Purtscher-like retinopathy evaluation, or ICG for central serous retinopathy, or retinal amyloid angiopathy) may aid in correct diagnosis.

Clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation following intravitreal brolucizumab as switching therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to explore the clinical features and associated factors of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) administration for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 eyes from 87 Japanese patients with nAMD who were followed up for 5 months after the initial administration of IVBr as switching therapy. Clinical pictures of IOI post-IVBr and changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 5 months were evaluated between eyes with and without IOI (non-IOI). The association between IOI and baseline factors (age, sex, BCVA, hypertension, and/or arteriosclerotic changes in the fundus, subretinal hyperreflective material [SHRM], and macular atrophy) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 87 eyes, 18 (20.6%) developed IOI and 2 (2.3%) developed retinal artery occlusion. There were 9 (50%) cases of posterior or pan-uveitis among eyes with IOI. The mean interval from initial IVBr administration to IOI was 2 months. The mean changes in logMAR BCVA at 5 months were significantly worse in IOI eyes than in non-IOI eyes (0.09 ± 0.22 vs. - 0.01 ± 0.15, P = 0.03). There were 8 (44.4%) and 7 (10.1%) cases of macular atrophy and 11 (61.1%) and 13 (18.8%) cases of SHRM in the IOI and non-IOI groups, respectively. SHRM and macular atrophy were significantly associated with IOI (P = 0.0008 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In IVBr therapy for nAMD, eyes with SHRM and/or macular atrophy should be observed more meticulously, given the increased risk of developing IOI, which is associated with insufficient BCVA gain.

Differential diagnosis of endophthalmitis after intravitreal drug injection for age related macular degeneration: Sterile vs. infectious

The recent release of brolucizumab and the development of new antiangiogenic molecules as abicipar pegol has increased the interest towards inflammatory complications after intravitreal drug injection. Those drugs are associated to a higher rate of inflammatory adverse events compared to classic drugs. In this context it is essential to differentiate between sterile and infectious cases for a fast and effective treatment. The clinical similarities between infectious and sterile cases, the high rate of culture negative patients and the heterogeneity in the terminology used are obstacles for a correct diagnosis and report of these complications. Sterile cases appear early after the injection, before 48 hours; or 20 days after in brolucizumab-related vasculitis cases. Infectious cases show up around the third day after injection and up to a week after it. A severe visual impairment, severe pain, severe hyperemia, hypopyon and a more severe intraocular inflammatory process are signs of a likely infectious origin. If the cause of the inflammation is uncertain we must follow up the patient closely or "tap and inject" antimicrobial agents in order to prevent the eventual complications of an infectious endophthalmitis. On the other hand, sterile endophthalmitis might be observed in mild cases or treated with steroids according to the severity of the inflammation.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF ACUTE ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER INTRAVITREAL DELIVERY OF VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INHIBITORS VERSUS STEROIDS

PURPOSE

To compare patients with acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors vs. steroids.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center, nonrandomized interventional study from 2013 to 2021.Patients underwent vitreous biopsy before initiating treatment and were divided into the following cohorts: (1) anti-VEGF managed medically (T&I-anti-VEGF), (2) anti-VEGF managed by immediate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV-anti-VEGF), and (3) steroid therapy and managed medically or by pars plana vitrectomy (steroid).

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were analyzed. The steroid cohort demonstrated significantly worse presenting (median = 2.80 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; P ≤ 0.01) and final (median = 2.30 logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity compared with T&I-anti-VEGF (presenting: median = 2.00 logMAR; final: median = 0.40 logMAR) and pars plana vitrectomy-anti-VEGF cohorts (presenting: median = 2.30 logMAR; final: median = 0.48 logMAR). There was no significant ( P = 0.33) difference in the final best-corrected visual acuity between T&I-anti-VEGF and pars plana vitrectomy-anti-VEGF cohorts. There were no significant ( P ≥ 0.63) differences among cohorts in best-corrected visual acuity before acute endophthalmitis diagnosis (T&I-anti-VEGF: median = 0.40 logMAR; pars plana vitrectomy-anti-VEGF: median = 0.40 logMAR; steroid: median = 0.44 logMAR). Microbial cultures revealed similar profiles for all cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal injection steroid therapy had worse outcomes compared with anti-VEGF therapy.

Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Acute-Onset Endophthalmitis Following Small-Gauge Pars Plana Vitrectomy Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Describe risk factors, findings, and outcomes of acute endophthalmitis (AE) following small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center, nonrandomized study of post-PPV AE patients from 2013 to 2021. All received vitreous biopsy before treatment. Patients were divided into cohorts: 1) PPV within 3 days of diagnosis (Urgent-PPV), and 2) no urgent PPV (Other-treatment [Tx]). Main outcome was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were analyzed. Epiretinal membrane was most common indication for PPV (48%). Incidence was 0.074%. Culture-positive rate was 57%. For final BCVA, there was no significant (P = 0.85) difference between Urgent-PPV (median = 0.40 logMAR) and Other Tx cohorts (median = 0.35 logMAR). Sclerotomy wounds were not sutured in 71% of patients. Approximately 24% and 38% of patients analyzed had either no tamponade or partial tamponade, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tamponade agents and sclerotomy suturing may be important factors when evaluating post-small-gauge PPV-associated AE. Further studies are necessary for clarification. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2023;54:xx-xx.].

Incidence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of Intraocular inflammation following Brolucizumab in Indian eyes - A multicentric study

Purpose

To report the incidence, clinical features, potential risk factors, and outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) following brolucizumab in Indian eyes.

Methods

All consecutive patients diagnosed with brolucizumab-induced IOI from 10 centers in eastern India between October 2020 and April 2022 were included.

Results

Of 758 injections given during the study period across centers, 13 IOI events (1.7%) were recorded attributable to brolucizumab. The IOI occurred after the first dose in two eyes (15%) (median 45 days after brolucizumab), second dose in six eyes (46%) (median = 8.5 days), and third dose (39%) in the remaining five eyes (median 7 days). Reinjections of brolucizumab were administered at a median interval of 6 weeks (interquartile range = 4-10 weeks) in the 11 eyes, where IOI occurred after the second or third dose. Eyes that experienced IOI after the third dose had received a significantly greater number of previous antivascular endothelial growth factor injections (median = 8) compared to those who developed it after the first or second dose (median = 4) (P = 0.001). Anterior chamber cells were seen in almost all eyes (n = 11, 85%), while peripheral retinal hemorrhages were seen in two eyes, and one eye showed branch artery occlusion. Two-thirds of patients (n = 8, 62%) recovered with a combination of topical and oral steroids, while remaining recovered with topical steroids alone. Irreversible visual loss was not seen in any eye, and median vision recovered to pre-IOI levels by 3 months' time point.

Conclusion

Brolucizumab-induced IOI was relatively rare, occurring in 1.7% of eyes, was more common after the second or third injection, especially in those who required frequent reinjections every 6 weeks, and occurred earlier with increasing number of previous brolucizumab injections. Continued surveillance is necessary even after repeated doses of brolucizumab.

The Role of Inflammation in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Updates and Possible Therapeutic Approaches

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common retinal disease characterized by complex pathogenesis and extremely heterogeneous characteristics. Both in "dry" and "wet" AMD forms, the inflammation has a central role to promote the degenerative process and to stimulate the onset of complications. AMD is characterized by several proinflammatory stimuli, cells and mediators involved, and metabolic pathways. Nowadays, inflammatory biomarkers may be unveiled and analyzed by means of several techniques, including laboratory approaches, histology, immunohistochemistry, and noninvasive multimodal retinal imaging. These methodologies allowed to perform remarkable steps forward for understanding the role of inflammation in AMD pathogenesis, also offering new opportunities to optimize the diagnostic workup of the patients and to develop new treatments. The main goal of the present paper is to provide an updated scenario of the current knowledge regarding the role of inflammation in "dry" and "wet" AMD and to discuss new possible therapeutic strategies.

Immunogenicity With Ranibizumab Biosimilar SB11 (Byooviz) and Reference Product Lucentis and Association With Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

SB11 and reference ranibizumab (RBZ) are monoclonal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A antibodies approved for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and other retinal diseases. The association of ranibizumab immunogenicity and treatment outcomes in patients with nAMD is unclear but relevant regarding concerns about immunogenicity of anti-VEGF biological products.

Objective

To examine the association of immunogenicity to ranibizumab products (SB11 and RBZ) with efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-masked, parallel-group phase 3 equivalence study with participants from 75 centers in 9 countries conducted from March 14, 2018, to December 9, 2019. Included were participants 50 years or older with nAMD and active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization lesions.

Interventions

Intravitreal injection of SB11 or RBZ, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks through week 48.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Serum antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were analyzed during the study period until week 52 to measure immunogenicity. Analyses were performed on immunogenicity (overall ADA positivity) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Adverse events associated with intraocular inflammation (IOI) and serum ranibizumab levels were compared between overall ADA-positive and ADA-negative participants.

Results

A total of 705 participants (mean [SD] age, 74.1 [8.5] years; 403 female individuals [57.2%]) were included in the study. The overall incidence of ADA-positivity was 32 of 657 (4.9%) at week 52. The least-squares mean (SE) differences between overall ADA-positive and ADA-negative participants up to week 52 for BCVA and CST, respectively, were 1.6 (2.2) letters (95% CI, -2.7 to 5.8; P = .46) and 3 (13) μm (95% CI, -23 to 29; P = .83). IOI-related events occurred in 1 of 32 overall ADA-positive participants (3.1%) and 4 of 620 overall ADA-negative participants (0.6%). Mean (SD) serum ranibizumab concentrations over time were slightly lower in overall ADA-positive participants compared with those of ADA-negative participants, with a maximum value of 1389.3 (875.4) pg/mL at week 16 vs 1665.4 (1124.0) pg/mL at week 36, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this post hoc analysis of an equivalence trial suggest that immunogenicity was not associated with efficacy and safety of SB11 and RBZ in participants with nAMD. With a low overall ADA incidence, no clear association was identified between overall ADA positivity and pharmacokinetics. These findings support the biosimilarity of SB11 and RBZ, with no safety concern identified for SB11 vs RBZ associated with immunogenicity.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03150589.

Reported Rates of Intraocular Inflammation with Intravitreal Aflibercept Administered via Pre-Filled Syringe or from Vials in Clinical Practice Between 2012 and 2022

Purpose

To determine the reported rates of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in patients treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) 2 mg in routine clinical practice (ie, outside interventional studies), across all indications and within all countries (excluding the United States), with access to either the vial presentation or pre-filled syringe (PFS).

Patients and methods

A search was conducted using the Bayer EYLEA^® Global Safety Pharmacovigilance Database for reported cases of IOI and IVT-AFL use between October 2012 and March 31, 2022.

Results

With more than 10 years of post-marketing experience with the IVT-AFL vial presentation (>25 million sold units), and over 2 years of experience with the PFS of IVT-AFL (>6.7 million sold units) the rate of any IOI, including endophthalmitis, outside the United States was 0.3 events per 10,000 units for the PFS and 1.2 events per 10,000 units for the vial presentation. The event rates specifically for endophthalmitis were 0.1 per 10,000 units for the IVT-AFL PFS and 0.6 per 10,000 units for the IVT-AFL vial presentation.

Conclusion

In patients with retinal diseases treated in routine clinical practice with IVT-AFL either from a vial or the PFS, medically important adverse events of IOI, and in particular, endophthalmitis, are infrequently reported events. Numerically, reported rates of IOI and endophthalmitis are low for the vial presentation and even lower for the PFS.

Ocular Vascular Events following COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review

The main aim of this study is to investigate the current evidence regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination and ocular vascular events. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022358133). On 18 August 2022, an electronic search was conducted through five databases. All original articles reporting individuals who were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines and developed ophthalmic vascular events were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the NIH tool. A total of 49 studies with 130 ocular vascular cases were included. Venous occlusive events were the most common events (54.3%), which mostly occurred following the first dose (46.2%) and within the first five days following vaccination (46.2%). Vascular events occurred more with the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines (81.6%), and mostly presented unilaterally (73.8%). The most frequently reported treatment was intravitreal anti-VEGF (n = 39, 30.4%). The majority of patients (90.1%) demonstrated either improvement (p = 0.321) or persistence (p = 0.414) in the final BCVA. Ophthalmic vascular events are serious vision-threatening side effects that have been associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Clinicians should be aware of the possible association between COVID-19 vaccines and ocular vascular events to provide early diagnosis and treatment.

Annular choroidal detachment following intravitreal aflibercept injection in a patient with nivolumab treatment: a case report

BACKGROUND

To present a novel case that developed annular choroidal detachment after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody injection in a patient after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 58-year-old Japanese man presented visual impairment in the right eye. Ophthalmological examination revealed macular edema in the right eye, which suggested the possibility of age-related macular degeneration. Following the intravitreal aflibercept injection, the annular choroidal detachment was observed in the injected eye. As hypotony or thick sclera was not observed, choroidal detachment seemed to have appeared due to enhanced inflammation by intravitreal injection. The patient had a history of stage IV paranasal cavity cancer and was treated with nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The immune response might have been enhanced due to the use of nivolumab so that intravitreal injection triggered inflammation. Three weeks after sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide, macular edema and choroidal detachment improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal aflibercept injection caused annular choroidal detachment in our patient, presumably because the immune system was activated after nivolumab treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of annular choroidal detachment that developed after intravitreal injection in a patient with a history of nivolumab therapy. With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with various cancers, clinicians should be aware of these potentially associated immune-related adverse events.

Do new drugs for diabetic macular edema offer a safer option?

INTRODUCTION

The last decade has witnessed important advances in retinal drug discovery, administered intravitreally, allowing high intraocular concentration and low systemic passage. However, local and systemic adverse events have been described and should be discussed before proposing treatment. In diabetes mellitus specifically, the choice of molecule and treatment regimen should limit the therapeutic burden, avoiding the need for frequent ophthalmological appointments, in patients receiving multi-disciplinary care.

AREAS COVERED

We aim to review and discuss the risk/benefit ratio of the main intravitreal therapies currently proposed for diabetic macular edema (DME), and how these treatments could be tailored to each individual patient.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-VEGF injections and steroid implants are currently the two therapeutic options proposed in cases of DME. New molecules in these two classes have recently been approved and are currently being studied under phase IV observations to establish their efficacy and tolerance. The preferred therapeutic option is determined based on the ocular condition and the patient profile. As new treatments are developed, new adverse events will also enter into consideration, and retinal physicians must therefore be able to call on a range of therapeutic options and question the risk/benefit ratio of each of them before proposing a treatment.

Preclinical Observations of Systemic and Ocular Antidrug Antibody Response to Intravitreally Administered Drugs

Intravitreally administered biotherapeutics can elicit local and systemic immune responses with potentially serious clinical consequences. However, little is known about the mechanisms of ocular antidrug immune response, the incidence of ocular antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and the relationship between ocular and systemic ADA levels. Bioanalytical limitations and poor availability of ocular matrices make studies of ocular immunogenicity particularly challenging. We have recently reported a novel bioanalytical ADA assay and shown its applicability for the ADA detection in ocular matrices. In the present study, we used this assay to analyze a large set of preclinical samples from minipig and cynomolgus monkeys treated with different ocular biotherapeutics. We found a significant association between the incidence of ADAs in plasma and ocular fluids after a single intravitreal administration of the drugs. Importantly, none of the animals with ADA-negative results in plasma had detectable ADAs in ocular fluids and systemic ADA response always preceded the appearance of ocular ADAs. Overall, our results suggest the systemic origin of ocular ADAs and support the use of plasma as a surrogate matrix for the detection of ocular ADA response.

Ocular adverse events associated with anti-VEGF therapy: A pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Background: The purpose of this study is to identify and characterize ocular adverse events (AEs) that are significantly associated with anti-VEGF drugs for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and compare the differences between each drug, and provide clinical reference. Methods: Ocular AEs submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration were analyzed to map the safety profile of anti-VEGF drugs. The Pharmacovigilance tools used for the quantitative detection of signals were reporting odds ratio and bayesian confidence propagation neural network. Results: A total of 10,608,503 AE reports were retrieved from FAERS, with 20,836 for ranibizumab, 19,107 for aflibercept, and 2,442 for brolucizumab between the reporting period of Q1, 2004 and Q3, 2021. We found and analyzed the different AEs with the strongest signal in each drug-ranibizumab-macular ischaemia (ROR = 205.27, IC-2SD = 3.70), retinal pigment epithelial tear (ROR = 836.54, IC-2SD = 7.19); aflibercept-intraocular pressure increased (ROR = 31.09, IC-2SD = 4.61), endophthalmitis (ROR = 178.27, IC-2SD = 6.70); brolucizumab-retinal vasculitis (ROR = 2930.41, IC-2SD = 7.47) and/or retinal artery occlusion (ROR = 391.11, IC-2SD = 6.10), dry eye (ROR = 12.48, IC-2SD = 2.88). Conclusion: The presence of AEs should bring clinical attention. The use of anti-VEGF drugs should be based on the patient's underlying or present medical condition to reduce any adverse event associated with the treatment.

RISK OF INTRAOCULAR INFLAMMATION AFTER INJECTION OF ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR AGENTS: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis investigates the incidence of intraocular inflammation (IOI) after intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injections in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central from January 2005 to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials comparing IOI after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, brolucizumab, or aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration were included. Primary outcomes were sight-threatening IOI, final best-corrected visual acuity, and change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of other IOI events. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,460 unique studies were screened, of which 14 randomized controlled trials and 6,759 eyes at baseline were included. There was no difference between agents for the risk of endophthalmitis and retinal vascular occlusion. Compared with aflibercept, brolucizumab had a higher incidence of generalized IOI (risk ratio = 6.24, 95% confidence interval = [1.40-27.90]) and vitreous haze/floaters (risk ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence interval = [1.00-2.67]). There were no significant differences between comparators for other secondary end points.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the risk of severe sight-threatening IOI outcomes between intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents. There was a significantly higher risk of generalized IOI after brolucizumab relative to aflibercept. Our results alongside other recent safety findings suggest the need for further investigation in the risk-benefit profile of brolucizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal medication injections represent the gold standard treatment for a variety of potentially blinding chorioretinal vascular diseases. Despite their excellent safety profile, they are associated with the feared complication of injection-related endophthalmitis (IRE). Though the overall incidence of IRE is low, due to the ever-increasing number of injections being performed, it is a complication that all retina specialists are likely to encounter. This article reviews various factors that could potentially influence the risk of IRE and discusses evidence-based strategies for management.

METHOD

PubMed was searched for keywords "intravitreal injection" and "endophthalmitis" from the period of 1995-2021. Relevant articles were reviewed and selected articles were analyzed with respect to the incidence, potential preventive factors, clinical presentation, microbial profile, management, and outcomes for IRE.

RESULTS

There is strong consensus supporting the use of povidone iodine topical antiseptic, eyelid retraction away from the injection site, and avoiding treatment of eyes with active surface or eyelid disease, but there is less agreement on the use of face masks versus "no-talking" policies and optimal anesthetic technique. Current evidence comparing tap and inject or early vitrectomy for treatment of IRE is inadequate to determine an optimal treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal injections are sight saving, but even using established prophylactic measures there remains a small but real risk of infectious injection-related complications. Further investigations comparing tap and inject versus vitrectomy may help to establish optimal treatment, although the rarity of IRE makes designing adequately powered prospective trials a difficult task.

Beovu, but not Lucentis impairs the function of the barrier formed by retinal endothelial cells in vitro

Because rare, but severe adverse effects, i.e. retinal vasculitis or retinal vein occlusion, have been observed after repetitive intravitreal injections of VEGF-A-binding single-chain variable fragment brolucizumab (Beovu), we investigated its possible impact on the barrier formed by immortalized bovine retinal endothelial cells (iBREC) in comparison to that of the VEGF-A-binding Fab fragment ranibizumab (Lucentis). As a measure of stability of the barrier formed by a confluent monolayer of iBREC, we determined the cell index over seven days by continuous electric cell-substrate impedance measurements: Beovu but not Lucentis indeed significantly lowered the cell index, evident about 1.5 days after its addition, pointing to barrier impairment. Early after addition of Beovu, amounts of the integrins α5 and β1-subunits of the fibronectin receptor-had changed in opposite ways, suggesting an effect on cell adhesion due to hindered dimer formation. After exposure for eight days to Beovu, levels of claudin-1-an essential part of the iBREC barrier-were significantly lower, less claudin-1 was located at the plasma membrane after exposure to the VEGF-A antagonist for five days. Beovu did not induce secretion of inflammatory cytokines or VEGF-A. Interestingly, polysorbate-80-component of Beovu-but not polysorbate-20-in Lucentis-slightly, but significantly lowered the cell index, also associated with reduced claudin-1 expression. In summary, our results indicate that Beovu changes the behavior of retinal endothelial cells, thus providing an alternative "non-immunological" explanation for the most relevant of observed side effects.

First Year Real Life Experience With Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Treatment of Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: To assess the morphological and functional outcomes within the first year of treatment with intravitreal brolucizumab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: This retrospective study included 21 eyes from 19 patients with refractory nAMD followed for 12 months. All patients were switched to brolucizumab after treatment with at least two other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF). All eyes received 3x brolucizumab 6 mg/0.05 ml intravitreal injections (IVI) monthly as an upload phase. Then eyes received an IVI every 8 weeks with interval adjustment to every 12 weeks if disease activity was not present. Main outcome measures: best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and retinal fluid distribution. In addition, we reported the adverse event rate. Results: The number of previous anti-VEGF IVIs/eye was 36 ± 22 before switching to brolucizumab. BCVA (ETDRS) was 51 ± 16 before treatment and 50 ± 19 at week 52 (p = 0.6). CMT was 374 ± 158 μm before treatment and 298 ± 92 μm at week 52 (p = 0.01). The number of IVIs/eye decreased from 9.6 ± 1.9 IVIs in the last year before switching to 6.4 ± 0.9 IVIs in the first year after switching to brolucizumab (p < 0.001). The rate of eyes with subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment decreased at week 52. Finally, two cases of intraocular inflammation were observed as adverse events. Conclusion: In the first year of treatment, intravitreal brolucizumab was able to stabilize visual acuity with significantly less IVIs in patients with refractory nAMD. It also improved anatomic outcomes in these patients, particularly reducing subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment and subsequently central macular thickness. However, two cases of intraocular inflammation were observed as adverse events.

Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients Treated with Intravitreal Injections

Objectives:

To determine if patients treated with multiple intravitreal injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration are more likely to suffer from dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty eyes of 30 patients were enrolled. One eye of each patient was treated with multiple monthly intravitreal injections for neovascular AMD (Group 1) and the fellow healthy eye received no treatment (Group 2). The presence of dry eye was evaluated using tear film break-up time, Schirmer 1 test, the Oxford scale, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). The loss rate of meibomian glands was evaluated by meibography and was graded and scored (meiboscore) from grade 0 (no loss of glands) to grade 3 (loss of >2/3 of total meibomian glands) for each eyelid.

Results:

Group 1 had lower mean Schirmer 1 and tear film break up-time measurements and higher mean OSDI score than Group 2, but the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.257, p=0.113, and p=0.212, respectively). Mean Oxford scale scores and meiboscore of the upper eyelids showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.594, p=0.663, respectively). The meiboscore of the lower eyelids was significantly higher in Group 1 (p=0.048).

Conclusion:

Multiple factors such as povidone-iodine and the preservatives in topical eye drops may cause inflammation leading to ocular surface damage in patients treated with multiple intravitreal injections. As the treatment requires repeated injections, exposure to these factors might worsen the ocular surface inflammation. The possibility of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction should be considered in these patients.