1
|
Leedy D, Elison DM, Farias F, Cheng R, McCabe JM. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention in patients with cancer. Heart 2023; 109:1508-1515. [PMID: 37147132 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of concurrent cancer and severe aortic stenosis (AS) is increasing due to an ageing population. In addition to shared traditional risk factors for AS and cancer, patients with cancer may be at increased risk for AS due to off-target effects of cancer-related therapy, such as mediastinal radiation therapy (XRT), as well as shared non-traditional pathophysiological mechanisms. Compared with surgical aortic valve replacement, major adverse events are generally lower in patients with cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI), especially in those with history of mediastinal XRT. Similar procedural and short-to-intermediate TAVI outcomes have been observed in patients with cancer as compared with no cancer, whereas long-term outcomes are dependent on cancer survival. Considerable heterogeneity exists between cancer subtypes and stage, with worse outcomes observed in those with active and advanced-stage disease as well as specific cancer subtypes. Procedural management in patients with cancer poses unique challenges and thus requires periprocedural expertise and close collaboration with the referring oncology team. The decision to ultimately pursue TAVI involves a multidisciplinary and holistic approach in assessing the appropriateness of intervention. Further clinical trial and registry studies are needed to better appreciate outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Leedy
- Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David M Elison
- Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Francisco Farias
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Richard Cheng
- Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James M McCabe
- Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bisceglia I, Canale ML, Silvestris N, Gallucci G, Camerini A, Inno A, Camilli M, Turazza FM, Russo G, Paccone A, Mistrulli R, De Luca L, Di Fusco SA, Tarantini L, Lucà F, Oliva S, Moreo A, Maurea N, Quagliariello V, Ricciardi GR, Lestuzzi C, Fiscella D, Parrini I, Racanelli V, Russo A, Incorvaia L, Calabrò F, Curigliano G, Cinieri S, Gulizia MM, Gabrielli D, Oliva F, Colivicchi F. Cancer survivorship at heart: a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology roadmap for healthcare professionals. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1223660. [PMID: 37786510 PMCID: PMC10541962 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1223660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In cancer, a patient is considered a survivor from the time of initial diagnosis until the end of life. With improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors (CS) has grown considerably and includes: (1) Patients cured and free from cancer who may be at risk of late-onset cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT); (2) Patients with long-term control of not-curable cancers in whom CTR-CVT may need to be addressed. This paper highlights the importance of the cancer care continuum, of a patient-centered approach and of a prevention-oriented policy. The ultimate goal is a personalized care of CS, achievable only through a multidisciplinary-guided survivorship care plan, one that replaces the fragmented management of current healthcare systems. Collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is the pillar of a framework in which primary care providers and other specialists must be engaged and in which familial, social and environmental factors are also taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma Bisceglia
- Integrated Cardiology Services, Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Canale
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Versilia, Azienda Usl Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido di Camaiore, Italy
| | - Nicola Silvestris
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood Gaetano Barresi, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Gallucci
- Cardio-oncology Unit, Department of OncoHaematology, IRCCS Referral Cancer Center of Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture (PZ), Italy
| | - Andrea Camerini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Versilia, Azienda Usl Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido di Camaiore, Italy
| | - Alessandro Inno
- Department of Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital (IRCCS), Negrar, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Camilli
- Department of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Maria Turazza
- Cardiology Department, National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Russo
- SC Patologie Cardiovascolari, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Trieste, Italy
| | - Andrea Paccone
- Department of Cardiology, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaella Mistrulli
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Lazio, Italy
| | - Leonardo De Luca
- Division of Cardiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Tarantini
- Divisione di Cardiologia, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio-Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Fabiana Lucà
- Cardiologia Interventistica, Utic, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Stefano Oliva
- UOSD Cardiologia di Interesse Oncologico, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Moreo
- Cardio Center De Gasperis, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Maurea
- Department of Cardiology, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Quagliariello
- Department of Cardiology, G. Pascale National Cancer Institute Foundation (IRCCS), Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Damiana Fiscella
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione “Garibaldi”, Catania, Italy
| | - Iris Parrini
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Mauritian Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Vito Racanelli
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, Palermo University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Lorena Incorvaia
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Medical Oncology, Palermo University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology and Specialized Medicine, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan; Division of Early Drug Development, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Division and Breast Unit, Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Michele Massimo Gulizia
- U.O.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Garibaldi-Nesima, Azienda di Rilievo Nazionale e Alta Specializzazione “Garibaldi”, Catania, Italy
| | - Domenico Gabrielli
- Division of Cardiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione per il Tuo cuore- Heart Care Foundation, Firenze, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Oliva
- Cardiologia 1- Emodinamica, Dipartimento Cardiotoracovascolare “A. De Gasperis”, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Furio Colivicchi
- Clinical and Rehabilitation Cardiology Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zafar MR, Sharma A, Sunder SS, Karthikeyan B, Nagahama M, Atia A, Bahuva R, Pokharel S, Iyer V, Kattel S, Sharma UC. Left atrial appendage volume as a prognostic Indicator of long-term mortality in Cancer survivors treated with thoracic radiation. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 9:2. [PMID: 36641509 PMCID: PMC9840329 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-023-00155-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy (CXRT) frequently present with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and have higher overall long-term mortality. There are no data examining the utility of left atrial (LA) and LA appendage (LAA) volume-indices to predict clinical outcomes in these patients. OBJECTIVES We examined the prognostic value of cardiac phase-dependent 3-D volume-rendered cardiac computerized tomography (CT)-derived LA and LAA volume-indices to predict mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in cancer survivors treated with thoracic irradiation. METHOD We screened 625 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who had undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement from 2012 to 2017. Based on the gated cardiac CT image quality, we included 184 patients (CXRT:43, non-CXRT:141) for further analysis. We utilized multiplane-3D-reconstructed cardiac CT images to calculate LA and LAA volume-indices, and examined the prognostic role of CCT-derived LA and LAA volume-indices in predicting the all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and MACE. We used multivariate cox-proportional hazard analysis to identify the clinical predictors of survival. RESULTS Overall, the CXRT group had significantly elevated LAA volume-index compared to non-CXRT group (CXRT:11.2 ± 8.9 ml/m2; non-CXRT:8.6 ± 4.5 ml/m2, p = 0.03). On multivariate cox-proportional hazard analysis, the elevated LAA volume and LAA volume-index were the strongest predictors of reduced survival in CXRT group compared to non-CXRT group (LAA volume: RR = 1.03,95% CI 1.0-1.01, p = 0.01; and LAA volume index: RR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.0-1.01, p = 0.03). LAA volume > 21.9 ml was associated with increased mortality. In contrast, LA volume was not a significant predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION We describe a novel technique to assess LA and LAA volume using 3-D volume-rendered cardiac CT. This study shows enlarged LAA volume rather than LA volume carries a poor prognosis in cancer-survivors treated with prior CXRT. Compared to conventionally reported markers, LAA volume of > 21.9 ml was incremental to that of other risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meer R. Zafar
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Ashutosh Sharma
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
- grid.425214.40000 0000 9963 6690Department of Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY USA
| | - Sunitha Shyam Sunder
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Badri Karthikeyan
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Makoto Nagahama
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
- grid.415875.a0000 0004 0368 6175Division of Cardiology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA USA
| | - Andrew Atia
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Ronak Bahuva
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Saraswati Pokharel
- grid.240614.50000 0001 2181 8635Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Vijay Iyer
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Sharma Kattel
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Umesh C. Sharma
- grid.273335.30000 0004 1936 9887Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Jacob’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY USA
- Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, 875 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patil S, Pingle SR, Shalaby K, Kim AS. Mediastinal irradiation and valvular heart disease. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY 2022; 8:7. [PMID: 35395814 PMCID: PMC8991889 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-022-00133-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAnticancer therapy has the potential to cause unwanted cardiovascular side effects. Utilization of radiation therapy to treat tumors near the heart can result in radiation-induced valvular heart disease among other cardiovascular pathologies. The aim of this review is to describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk prediction, non-invasive imaging modalities and management of radiation-induced valvular heart disease with a focus on pre-operative risk assessment and contemporary treatment options.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohanty BD, Coylewright M, Sequeira AR, Shin D, Liu Y, Li D, Fradley M, Alu MC, Mack MJ, Kapadia SR, Kodali S, Thourani VH, Makkar RR, Leon MB, Malenka D. Characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with prior chest radiation undergoing TAVR: Observations from PARTNER-2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 99:1877-1885. [PMID: 35289473 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the viability of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) in patients with prior chest radiation therapy (cXRT). BACKGROUND Since patients with prior cXRT perform poorly with surgical aortic valve replacement, TAVR can be a viable alternative. However, clinical outcomes after TAVR in this patient population have not been well studied. METHODS From the pooled registry of the placement of aortic transcatheter valves II trial, we identified patients with and without prior cXRT who underwent TAVR (n = 64 and 3923, respectively). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and any stroke at 2 years. Time to event analyses were shown as Kaplan-Meier event rates and compared by log-rank testing. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated and compared by Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the patients with and without prior cXRT (30.7% vs. 27.0%; p = 0.75; HR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.77). Rates of myocardial infarction, vascular complications, acute kidney injury, or new pacemaker implant after TAVR were not statistically different between the two groups. The rate of immediate reintervention with a second valve for aortic regurgitation after TAVR was higher among the patients with prior cXRT. However, no further difference was observed during 2 years follow-up after discharge from the index-procedure hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS TAVR is a viable alternative for severe symptomatic AS in patients who had cXRT in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibhu D Mohanty
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Megan Coylewright
- Department of Cardiology, Erlanger Health System, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ashton R Sequeira
- Department of Internal Medicine,Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Doosup Shin
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Yangbo Liu
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Ditian Li
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Michael Fradley
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria C Alu
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Michael J Mack
- Cardiothoracic Surgery Service, Baylor Scott & White Healthcare, Plano, Texas, USA
| | - Samir R Kapadia
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Susheel Kodali
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Vinod H Thourani
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Raj R Makkar
- Interventional Cardiology Division, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Martin B Leon
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - David Malenka
- Division of Cardiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parekh A, Sengupta V, Hunyadi V, Ianitelli M, Zainea M. Aortic Valve Leaflet Rupture Causing Delayed Left Main Coronary Ostial Obstruction During Valvuloplasty Preceding TAVR. JACC Case Rep 2021; 3:1822-1827. [PMID: 34917962 PMCID: PMC8642731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
A 69-year-old man with mediastinal radiation history underwent balloon valvuloplasty before transcatheter aortic valve replacement, which caused aortic leaflet rupture leading to unstable severe aortic regurgitation and subsequent left main ostial obstruction. A balloon-expanding valve was implanted to capture the ruptured leaflet and a left main stent was placed. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akarsh Parekh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan, USA
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Address for correspondence: Dr Akarsh Parekh, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Cardiovascular Medicine, 1000 Harrington Street, Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043, USA.
| | - Vivek Sengupta
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan, USA
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Victor Hunyadi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan, USA
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Melissa Ianitelli
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan, USA
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Mark Zainea
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, McLaren Macomb Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan, USA
- Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Diaz-Arocutipa C, Torres-Valencia J, Zavaleta-Camacho G, Vicent L. Association Between Previous or Active Cancer and Clinical Outcomes in TAVR Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 255,840 Patients. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:763557. [PMID: 34796218 PMCID: PMC8593236 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.763557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It has been proposed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be an option for patients with cancer and severe aortic stenosis. We assessed the association between previous or active cancer and clinical outcomes in TAVR patients. Methods: We searched four electronic databases from inception to March 05, 2021. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, major bleeding, and vascular complications. All meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Relative risks (RRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were pooled. Results: Thirteen cohort studies involving 255,840 patients were included. The time period for mortality ranged from inpatient to 10 years. Patients with active cancer had a higher risk of all-cause mortality using both crude (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.13-1.88) and adjusted (aHR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.43-2.25) estimates compared to non-cancer group. In contrast, the risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.58-2.73), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.34-2.57), stroke (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.75-1.09), pacemaker implantation (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.50-1.53), acute kidney injury (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.04), major bleeding (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.80-1.66), and vascular complications (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.18) was similar between patients with or without cancer. Conclusion: Our review shows that TAVR patients with active cancer had an increased risk of all-cause mortality. No significant association with secondary outcomes was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa
- Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.,Programa de Atención Domiciliaria - EsSalud, Lima, Peru
| | - Javier Torres-Valencia
- Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.,Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Gabriela Zavaleta-Camacho
- Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.,Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Lourdes Vicent
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lestuzzi C, Mascarin M, Coassin E, Canale ML, Turazza F. Cardiologic Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Chest Radiotherapy: When and How? Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:671001. [PMID: 34760934 PMCID: PMC8572927 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.671001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Radiotherapy may cause valvular (VHD), pericardial, coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), arrhythmias. The risk of radiation induced heart disease (RIHD) increases over time. The current guidelines suggest a screening for RIHD every 5 years in the long-term survivors who had been treated by chest RT. Methods: We reviewed the clinical and instrumental data of 106 patients diagnosed with RIHD. In one group (Group A: 69 patients) RIHD was diagnosed in an asymptomatic phase through a screening with ECG, echocardiogram and stress test. A second group (37 patients) was seen when RIHD was symptomatic. We compared the characteristics of the two groups at the time of RT, of RIHD detection and at last follow-up. Results: Overall, 64 patients (60%) had CAD (associated to other RIHD in 18); 39 (36.7%) had LVD (isolated in 20); 24 (22.6%) had VHD (isolated in 10 cases). The interval between the last negative test and the diagnosis of moderate or severe RIHD was <5 years in 26 patients, and <4 years in 18. In group A, 63% of the patients with CAD had silent ischemia. The two groups did not differ with regard to type of tumor, cardiovascular risk factors, use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, age at RT treatment, radiation dose and interval between RT and toxicity detection. The mean time from RT and RIHD was 16 years in group A and 15 in group B. Interventional therapy at RIHD diagnosis was more frequent in group B (54 vs. 30%, p < 0.05). At last follow-up, 27 patients had died (12 of cancer, 9 of cardiac causes, 6 of other causes); mean ejection fraction was 60% in group A and 50% in group B (p < 0.01). Patients with ejection fraction ≤ 50% were 14.5% in group A and 40% in group B (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Clinically relevant RIHD become evident at a mean interval of 16 years after RT. The most frequent clinical manifestations are CAD and LVD. RIHD diagnosis in asymptomatic patients may preserve their cardiac function with timely interventions. We suggest -after 10 years from radiotherapy- a screening every 2–3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Lestuzzi
- Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale (ASFO) Department of Cardiology, Cardiology and Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Service, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Istituto di Ricerca e Cura di Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Maurizio Mascarin
- Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) Oncology and Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Istituto di Ricerca e Cura di Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Elisa Coassin
- Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) Oncology and Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Istituto di Ricerca e Cura di Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Canale
- Cardiology Department, Azienda Usl Toscana Nord-Ovest, Ospedale Versilia, Camaiore, Italy
| | - Fabio Turazza
- Cardiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), Istituto di Ricerca e Cura di Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Frattini S, Troise G, Fucci C, Pressman GS, Faggiano P. Aortic valve stenosis and cancer: a common and complex association. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2021; 19:289-299. [PMID: 33688784 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1902306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction. The prevalence of aortic valve stenosis (AS) and malignancy are both high, especially in elderly people and in developed countries. These two conditions frequently coexist and share the same risk factors as atherosclerotic disease.Area covered. The progression of calcified AS may be accelerated by both cardiovascular risk factors and cancer treatments, such as radiotherapy. The standard treatment for symptomatic severe AS is surgical aortic valve replacement; however, in cancer patients, transcatheter implantation may be preferred as they are often at high-risk for cardiac surgery. In patients with AS and cancer, physicians may face difficult treatment decisions.To date, there is limited information on the impact of malignancy on outcomes in patients with severe AS; hence, there is no established treatment policy.Expert Opinion. Treating clinicians must integrate complex information about the severity of valve disease and expected cardiac outcomes with information regarding the cancer prognosis and the need for specific treatment, including surgery. Other comorbidities, age and frailty also contribute to decision-making about whether, when, and how to perform aortic valve replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni Troise
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Carlo Fucci
- Cardiac Surgery Division, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gregg S Pressman
- Einstein Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US
| | - Pompilio Faggiano
- , University of Brescia and Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zafar MR, Mustafa SF, Miller TW, Alkhawlani T, Sharma UC. Outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY 2020; 6:8. [PMID: 32685198 PMCID: PMC7359474 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-020-00062-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Cancer survivors with prior chest radiation therapy (C-XRT) frequently present with aortic stenosis (AS) as the first manifestation of radiation-induced heart disease. They are considered high-risk for surgical valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is as an attractive option for this patient population but the outcomes are not well established in major clinical trials. The authors performed a systemic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies for the outcomes after TAVR in cancer survivors with prior C-XRT. Methods Online databases were searched from inception to April 2020 for studies evaluating the outcomes of TAVR in patients with and without C-XRT. We analyzed the pooled estimates (with their 95% confidence intervals) of the odds ratio (OR) for the all-cause mortality at 30-day and 1-year follow-ups, 4-point safety outcomes (stroke, major bleed, access-related vascular complications and need for a pacemaker), a 2-point efficacy outcome (mean aortic valve gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction) and worsening of congestive heart failure (CHF). Four studies were included following 2054 patients with and without prior C-XRT exposure (164 patients and 1890 patients respectively). Results The C-XRT group had similar 30-day mortality compared to the control group (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.58, p = 0.48). The 1-year mortality was higher in the C-XRT group (OR 1.97, CI 1.15 to 3.39, p = 0.01). Apart from higher congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation in the C-XRT group (OR 2.03, CI 1.36 to 3.04, p = 0.0006), TAVR resulted in similar safety and efficacy outcomes in both groups. Conclusion TAVR in the C-XRT group has similar 30-day mortality, safety, and efficacy outcomes compared to the control group; however, they have higher 1-year mortality and CHF exacerbation. Including an oncologist to the cardiology team who considers cancer stage in the decision-making process and applying additional preoperative scores such as frailty indices may refine the risk assessment for these patients. The quality of analyzed data is modest, warranting randomized trials to assess the true benefits of TAVR in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meer Rabeel Zafar
- Department of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA
| | | | - Timothy W Miller
- Department of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA
| | - Talal Alkhawlani
- Department of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA
| | - Umesh C Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Division Cardiology, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 875 Ellicott Street, Suite 7030, Buffalo, New York, 14203 USA
| |
Collapse
|