Goal-directed therapy reduces fluid balance while maintaining hemodynamic stability in intraoperative management of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective comparative study

Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Optimal fluid management in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients remains contested. We aimed to examine the association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We studied 168 pancreaticoduodenectomy patients operated in 2015 (n = 93) or 2017 (n = 75) at Helsinki University Hospital. In 2015, patients received intraoperative fluids following a goal-directed approach and, in 2017, according to anesthesiologist's clinical practice (conventional fluid management). We analyzed the differences in perioperative fluid administration between the groups, specifically examining the occurrence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III), pancreatic fistulas, cardiovascular complications, and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The goal-directed group received more intraoperative fluids than the conventional fluid management group (12.0 ml/kg/h vs. 8.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Urine output (770 ml vs. 575 ml, p = 0.004) and intraoperative fluid balance (9.4 ml/kg/h vs. 6.3 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001) were higher in the goal-directed group than in the conventional fluid management group. Severe surgical complications (19.4% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.009) as well as clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (1.1% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.011) occurred more frequently in patients receiving conventional fluid management. Moreover, the conventional fluid management group experienced longer hospital stays (9.0 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.02). Lower intraoperative fluid volume accompanying conventional fluid management was associated with a higher risk of severe postoperative complications compared with higher volume in the goal-directed group (odds ratio 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.04-6.42), p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The goal-directed group experienced severe complications less frequently. Our findings indicate that optimizing the intraoperative fluid administration benefits patients, while adopting a too-restrictive approach represents an inferior choice.

Effect of different levels of stroke volume variation on the endothelial glycocalyx of patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A randomized clinical trial

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Massive infusion can destroy the endothelial glycocalyx. We compared the serum concentrations of endothelial glycocalyx components and atrial natriuretic peptide and the outcomes of patients with different levels of stroke volume variation (SVV). What is the main finding and its importance? With a decrease in SVV, the serum concentrations of endothelial glycocalyx components and atrial natriuretic peptide increased, whereas the oxygenation index decreased. When the intraoperative SVV was maintained at 7-10%, the patients had better postoperative recovery and shorter postoperative hospital stays. Therefore, it is advisable to maintain the SVV between 7 and 10%.

ABSTRACT

Dynamic haemodynamic parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV), can be used for blood volume monitoring. However, studies have determined the SVV threshold but not the optimal level. The endothelial glycocalyx (EG) plays an important role in maintaining vascular permeability. Moreover, rapid and massive infusion can lead to the degradation, shedding and destruction of the EG. We aimed to explore the effects of different SVV values (11-14, 7-10 or 3-6%) on the EG in 54 patients who were scheduled for elective colorectal tumour surgery and to identify the optimal peri-operative fluid therapy strategy. The concentrations of EG degradation products (heparin sulphate, hyaluronic acid and syndecan-1) and atrial natriuretic peptide were higher when the SVV was maintained between 3 and 6% after fluid therapy compared with pre-infusion (P < 0.05). Comparison of postoperative complications and hospitalization time among the three SVV levels was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The postoperative hospitalization time in patients with SVV of 7-10% was shorter than that in patients with SVV of 3-6%. Infusion of a large volume of fluid, with increasing EG degeneration and atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations, might be related to postoperative outcomes.

Goal-directed therapy with bolus albumin 5% is not superior to bolus ringer acetate in maintaining systemic and mesenteric oxygen delivery in major upper abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Goal-directed therapy (GDT) is increasingly used in abdominal surgery. Whether crystalloids can exert the same effect as colloid, and how this may affect perfusion, is still unclear. The effect of GDT on the systemic oxygen delivery index (sDO2I) and the mesenteric oxygen delivery index (mDO2I) can be quantified by measuring cardiac index and flow in the superior mesenteric artery, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that intra-operative GDT with bolus human albumin 5% is superior to GDT with bolus ringer acetate in maintaining sDO2I and mDO2I in elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled double blinded trial.

SETTING

Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from May 2014 to June 2015.

PATIENTS

A total of 89 adults scheduled for elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery were randomised and data from 60 were analysed.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

contraindications for using the LiDCOplus system, known allergy to albumin, pre-operative renal failure, pancreatic cancer and pre-operative down staging using chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to intra-operative GDT with either bolus human albumin or ringer acetate 250 ml, guided by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in sDO2I and mDO2I. Secondary outcomes were changes in other haemodynamic variables, fluid balance, blood transfusions, fluid-related complications and length of stay (LOS) in ICU and hospital.

RESULTS

Median [IQR] sDO2I was 522 [420 to 665] ml min m in the ringer acetate group and 490 [363 to 676] ml min m in the human albumin group, P = 0.36. Median [IQR] mDO2I was 12.1 [5.8 to 28.7] ml min m in the ringer acetate group and 17.0 [7.6 to 27.5] ml min m in the human albumin group, P = 0.17. Other haemodynamic comparisons did not differ significantly. More trial fluid was administered in the ringer acetate group. We found no significant difference in transfusions, complications or LOS.

CONCLUSION

Bolus human albumin 5% was not superior to bolus ringer acetate in maintaining systemic or mesenteric oxygen delivery in elective major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, despite the administration of larger volumes of trial fluid in the ringer acetate group. No significant difference was seen in fluid-related complications or LOS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/ Identifier: 2013-002217-36.