1
|
Brazil V, Reedy G. Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety. Adv Simul (Lond) 2024; 9:16. [PMID: 38720396 PMCID: PMC11080180 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00291-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The simulation community has effectively responded to calls for a more direct contribution by simulation to healthcare quality and safety, and clearer alignment with health service priorities, but the conceptual framing of this contribution has been vague. The term 'translational simulation' was proposed in 2017 as a "functional term for how simulation may be connected directly with health service priorities and patient outcomes, through interventional and diagnostic functions" (Brazil V. Adv Simul. 2:20, 2017). Six years later, this conceptual framing is clearer. Translational simulation has been applied in diverse contexts, affording insights into its strengths and limitations. Three core concepts are identifiable in recently published translational simulation studies: a clear identification of simulation purpose, an articulation of the simulation process, and an engagement with the conceptual foundations of translational simulation practice. In this article, we reflect on current translational simulation practice and scholarship, especially with respect to these three core concepts, and offer a further elaborated conceptual model based on its use to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
| | - Gabriel Reedy
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Waterloo Bridge Wing G7, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duff JP, Morse KJ, Seelandt J, Gross IT, Lydston M, Sargeant J, Dieckmann P, Allen JA, Rudolph JW, Kolbe M. Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Simul Healthc 2024; 19:S112-S121. [PMID: 38240623 DOI: 10.1097/sih.0000000000000765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as "In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?" We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Duff
- From the Department of Pediatrics (J.P.D.), University of Alberta. Edmonton, Canada; College of Nursing and Health Professions (K.J.M.), Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; Simulation Centre (J.S., M.K.), University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine (I.T.G.), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Treadwell Virtual Library (M.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Faculty of Medicine (J.S.), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) (P.D.), Herlev, Denmark; Department of Quality and Health Technology (P.D.), University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Public Health (P.D.), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Family and Preventive Medicine (J.A.A.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Center for Medical Simulation (J.W.R.), Boston, MA; and ETH Zurich (M.K.), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Piliuk K, Tomforde S. Artificial intelligence in emergency medicine. A systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform 2023; 180:105274. [PMID: 37944275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Motivation and objective: Emergency medicine is becoming a popular application area for artificial intelligence methods but remains less investigated than other healthcare branches. The need for time-sensitive decision-making on the basis of high data volumes makes the use of quantitative technologies inevitable. However, the specifics of healthcare regulations impose strict requirements for such applications. Published contributions cover separate parts of emergency medicine and use disparate data and algorithms. This study aims to systematize the relevant contributions, investigate the main obstacles to artificial intelligence applications in emergency medicine, and propose directions for further studies. METHODS The contributions selection process was conducted with systematic electronic databases querying and filtering with respect to established exclusion criteria. Among the 380 papers gathered from IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Springer Library, ScienceDirect, and Nature databases 116 were considered to be a part of the survey. The main features of the selected papers are the focus on emergency medicine and the use of machine learning or deep learning algorithms. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION The selected papers were classified into two branches: diagnostics-specific and triage-specific. The former ones are focused on either diagnosis prediction or decision support. The latter covers such applications as mortality, outcome, admission prediction, condition severity estimation, and urgent care prediction. The observed contributions are highly specialized within a single disease or medical operation and often use privately collected retrospective data, making them incomparable. These and other issues can be addressed by creating an end-to-end solution based on human-machine interaction. CONCLUSION Artificial intelligence applications are finding their place in emergency medicine, while most of the corresponding studies remain isolated and lack higher generalization and more sophisticated methodology, which can be a matter of forthcoming improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sven Tomforde
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24118 Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schram A, Jensen HI, Gamborg M, Lindhard M, Rölfing J, Kjaergaard-Andersen G, Bie M, Jensen RD. Exploring the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave among healthcare professionals: a cohort study across multiple hospital sites. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076163. [PMID: 37899150 PMCID: PMC10618977 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Burnout and mental illness are frequent among healthcare professionals, leading to increased sick leave. Simulation-based team training has been shown to improve job satisfaction and mental health among healthcare professionals. This study seeks to investigate the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION Five Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS A total of 15 751 individuals were screened for eligibility. To meet the eligibility criteria, individuals had to be employed in the same group (intervention or control) for the whole study period. A total of 14 872 individuals were eligible for analysis in the study. INTERVENTION From 2017 to 2019, a simulation-based team training intervention was implemented at two hospital sites. Three hospital sites served as the control group. OUTCOME MEASURES Data on sick leave from 2015 to 2020 covered five hospital sites. Using a difference-in-difference analysis, the rate of sick leave was compared across hospital sites (intervention vs control) and time periods (before vs after intervention). RESULTS Significant alterations in sick leave were evident when comparing the intervention and control groups. When comparing groups over time, the increase in sick leave was -0.3% (95% CI -0.6% to -0.0%) lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The difference-in-difference for the complete case analysis showed that this trend remained consistent, with analysis indicating a comparable lower increase in sick leave by -0.7% (95% CI -1.3% to -0.1%) in the intervention group. CONCLUSION The increase in sick leave rate was statistically significantly lower in the intervention group, implying that simulation-based team training could serve as a protective factor against sick leave. However, when investigating this simulation intervention over 5 years, other potential factors may have influenced sick leave, so caution is required when interpreting the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanne Irene Jensen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maria Gamborg
- MidtSim, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Morten Lindhard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Paediatrics, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Jan Rölfing
- MidtSim, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Orthopaedics, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Kjaergaard-Andersen
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital-University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Magnus Bie
- MidtSim, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bäckström M, Leijon-Sundqvist K, Lundvall LL, Jonsson K, Engström Å. On the edge of decision-making in trauma care: A focus group study on radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29:1123-1129. [PMID: 37797480 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The temporary trauma teams in trauma alerts consist of a diverse group of unique professionals requiring interprofessional collaboration and coordination to achieve efficient, high-quality care. The uncertain situation and complex care environment impose high demands on team dynamics such as individual attitudes and team behaviours. Within interprofessional teams, interaction and coordination reflect the collective success of collaboration and the achievement of goals. Interactions with radiographers have increased in trauma teams given computed tomography's prominent role in providing crucial knowledge for decision-making in trauma care. This study aimed to explore radiographers' experiences of interprofessional collaboration during trauma alerts. METHOD The study was designed with focus group methodology, including 17 radiographers participating in five focus groups, analysed with an inductive focus group analysis. RESULTS An overarching theme, "On the edge of decision-making", emerged along with three sub-themes: "Feeling included requires acknowledgement", "Exclusion precludes shared knowledge", and "Experience and mutual awareness facilitate team interaction". CONCLUSIONS Interprofessional collaboration from the radiographer's perspective within trauma teams requires a sense of inclusion and the ability to interact with the team. Exclusion from vital decision-making obstructs radiographers' comprehension of situations and thereby the interdependence in interprofessional collaboration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Common platforms are needed for knowledge sharing and team practices, including radiographers' areas of responsibility and relational coordination to foster interprofessional relationships. Through these means interdependence through awareness and shared knowledge can be facilitated on trauma teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bäckström
- Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
| | - K Leijon-Sundqvist
- Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
| | - L-L Lundvall
- Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Radiology, Västerviks Hospital, Västervik, Sweden
| | - K Jonsson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Å Engström
- Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Scheer JW, Cornthwaite K, Hewitt P, Bahl R, Randall W, Powell A, Ansari A, Attal B, Willars J, Woodward M, Brown IAF, Olsson A, Richards N, Price E, Giusti A, Leeding J, Hinton L, Burt J, Dixon-Woods M, Maistrello G, Fahy N, Lyons O, Draycott T. Training for managing impacted fetal head at caesarean birth: multimethod evaluation of a pilot. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002340. [PMID: 37524515 PMCID: PMC10391817 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of national multiprofessional training for managing the obstetric emergency of impacted fetal head (IFH) at caesarean birth has potential to improve quality and safety in maternity care, but is currently lacking in the UK. OBJECTIVES To evaluate a training package for managing IFH at caesarean birth with multiprofessional maternity teams. METHODS The training included an evidence-based lecture supported by an animated video showing management of IFH, followed by hands-on workshops and real-time simulations with use of a birth simulation trainer, augmented reality and management algorithms. Guided by the Kirkpatrick framework, we conducted a multimethod evaluation of the training with multiprofessional maternity teams. Participants rated post-training statements about relevance and helpfulness of the training and pre-training and post-training confidence in their knowledge and skills relating to IFH (7-point Likert scales, strongly disagree to strongly agree). An ethnographer recorded sociotechnical observations during the training. Participants provided feedback in post-training focus groups. RESULTS Participants (N=57) included 21 midwives, 25 obstetricians, 7 anaesthetists and 4 other professionals from five maternity units. Over 95% of participants agreed that the training was relevant and helpful for their clinical practice and improving outcomes following IFH. Confidence in technical and non-technical skills relating to managing IFH was variable before the training (5%-92% agreement with the pre-training statements), but improved in nearly all participants after the training (71%-100% agreement with the post-training statements). Participants and ethnographers reported that the training helped to: (i) better understand the complexity of IFH, (ii) recognise the need for multiprofessional training and management and (iii) optimise communication with those in labour and their birth partners. CONCLUSIONS The evaluated training package can improve self-reported knowledge, skills and confidence of multiprofessional teams involved in management of IFH at caesarean birth. A larger-scale evaluation is required to validate these findings and establish how best to scale and implement the training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan W van der Scheer
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katie Cornthwaite
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Rachna Bahl
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Alison Powell
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Akbar Ansari
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bothaina Attal
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Janet Willars
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Woodward
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Imogen A F Brown
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Annabelle Olsson
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Natalie Richards
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Evleen Price
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alessandra Giusti
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joann Leeding
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lisa Hinton
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jenni Burt
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mary Dixon-Woods
- THIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Oscar Lyons
- RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Draycott
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eller S, Rudolph J, Barwick S, Janssens S, Bajaj K. Leading change in practice: how "longitudinal prebriefing" nurtures and sustains in situ simulation programs. ADVANCES IN SIMULATION (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 8:3. [PMID: 36681827 PMCID: PMC9862849 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-023-00243-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
In situ simulation (ISS) programs deliver patient safety benefits to healthcare systems, however, face many challenges in both implementation and sustainability. Prebriefing is conducted immediately prior to a simulation activity to enhance engagement with the learning activity, but is not sufficient to embed and sustain an ISS program. Longer-term and broader change leadership is required to engage colleagues, secure time and resources, and sustain an in situ simulation program. No framework currently exists to describe this process for ISS programs. This manuscript presents a framework derived from the analysis of three successful ISS program implementations across different hospital systems. We describe eight change leadership steps adapted from Kotter's change management theory, used to sustainably implement the ISS programs analyzed. These steps include the following: (1) identifying goals of key stakeholders, (2) engaging a multi-professional team, (3) creating a shared vision, (4) communicating the vision effectively, (5) energizing participants and enabling program participation, (6) identifying and celebrating early success, (7) closing the loop on early program successes, and (8) embedding simulation in organizational culture and operations. We describe this process as a "longitudinal prebrief," a framework which provides a step-by-step guide to engage colleagues and sustain successful implementation of ISS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Eller
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Immersive Learning and Learning Spaces, Center for Immersive and Simulation-Based Learning, School of Medicine, Stanford University, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA LK311B USA
| | - Jenny Rudolph
- grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Surgery, Health Professions Education, Center for Medical Simulation, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital-Institute for Health Professions, Boston, MA USA
| | - Stephanie Barwick
- Clinical Education, Mater Education, Mater Misericordiae, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah Janssens
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinical Simulation, Mater Health, Mater Misericordiae, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Komal Bajaj
- grid.251993.50000000121791997Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Department of Quality & Safety, NYC H+H Simulation Center, NYC Health + Hospitals/Jacobi, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Doucet S, Luke A, Anthonisen G. Hospital-based patient navigation programs for patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066260. [PMID: 36572494 PMCID: PMC9806040 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review's objective is to map the literature on the characteristics, impact, barriers and facilitators of hospital-based patient navigation programmes that support patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers. Patients who experience injury-related trauma frequently require support from multiple care teams and face many challenges to care, both in hospital and when transitioning across settings and services. Patient navigation can improve their care. DESIGN This review is conducted according to JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The initial database search took place on 6 June 2021 and the grey literature search took place between September and October 2021. The results are presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Scoping Reviews flow diagram. SETTING This review considered materials where the patient navigation programmes were delivered in hospital settings. There was no geographical limit to this study. PARTICIPANTS This review focused on hospital-based patient navigation programmes for patients who experience injury-related trauma and/or their caregivers. RESULTS This review captured 11 records that describe 10 programmes. All programmes were based in the USA. Most programmes provided education, care coordination, discharge planning, and referrals to resources, services, and programmes to assist patients and/or their families in the hospital or the community. Half the programmes were based in level 1 trauma centres. Common impacts included decreases in readmission rates and increases in satisfaction rates. Barriers included difficulty recruiting or enrolling patients with short hospital stays and hospital administrators' and healthcare providers' lack of understanding of the navigator role. Navigator background, either professional or experiential, was identified as a facilitator, as was flexibility in programme delivery and communication methods. CONCLUSIONS Eleven records show a small but distinct sample. Reported characteristics, impact, barriers and facilitators were consistent with findings from other patient navigation studies. The results can inform the development and implementation of similar programmes in trauma centres and support changes in policy to improve the delivery of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley Doucet
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- University of New Brunswick (UNB) Saint John Collaboration for Evidence-Informed Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- Centre for Research in Integrated Care, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Alison Luke
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- University of New Brunswick (UNB) Saint John Collaboration for Evidence-Informed Healthcare: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- Centre for Research in Integrated Care, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Grailing Anthonisen
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- Centre for Research in Integrated Care, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Purdy E, Borchert L, El‐Bitar A, Isaacson W, Jones C, Bills L, Brazil V. Psychological safety and emergency department team performance: A mixed‐methods study. Emerg Med Australas 2022; 35:456-465. [PMID: 36519387 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Team culture underpins team performance. Psychological safety - 'a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk taking' - is a critical component of team culture for high-performing teams across contexts. However, psychological safety in ED teams has not been well explored. We aimed to explore this core teamwork concept in the ED. METHODS This was a sequential mixed-methods study of nursing and medical staff at a large tertiary care ED in Australia from October 2020 to March 2021. First, participants completed the 'Team Learning and Psychological Safety Survey' and a narrative questionnaire. These findings informed semi-structured interviews. We determined median psychological safety and compared results across role and length of time working in the department. Qualitative results were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis using a previously generated framework for enablers of psychological safety at the individual, team and organisational levels. RESULTS The survey was completed by 72/410 participants and 19 interviews were conducted. The median psychological safety score was 37/49 (IQR 13). Psychological safety was not experienced universally, with nurses and new staff experiencing lower levels. Individual, team and organisational factors impacted psychological safety. The primary force shaping psychological safety was familiarity with colleagues and leaders. CONCLUSION Familiarity of team members and leaders was critical to the development of psychological safety within the ED. Fostering familiarity should be a focus for frontline leadership each shift and a priority in broader departmental decisions for those seeking to enhance the psychological safety of their teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Purdy
- Emergency Department Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Laura Borchert
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Anthony El‐Bitar
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Warwick Isaacson
- Emergency Department Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Cindy Jones
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Lucy Bills
- Emergency Department Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Victoria Brazil
- Emergency Department Gold Coast University Hospital Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cassidy DJ, Jogerst K, Coe T, Monette D, Sell N, Eurboonyanum C, Hamdi I, Sampson M, Petrusa E, Stearns D, Gee DW, Chyn A, Saillant N, Takayesu JK. Simulation versus reality: what can interprofessional simulation teach us about team dynamics in the trauma bay? GLOBAL SURGICAL EDUCATION : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SURGICAL EDUCATION 2022; 1:56. [PMID: 38013715 PMCID: PMC9614190 DOI: 10.1007/s44186-022-00063-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Surgical consultation and the joint management of trauma patients is a common scenario in the emergency department. The goal of this study was to utilize interprofessional trauma team training to understand the role of simulation and its impact on the overall culture of trauma-related care. Methods Interdisciplinary trauma simulation scenarios were completed by 12 groups of emergency medicine residents, general surgery residents, and emergency medicine nurses across two academic years. Following each simulation, a debriefing session was held to reflect on the scenario, focusing on team interactions. Debriefing sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, deidentified, and independently, inductively coded by two members of the research team. Using the constant comparative method, a codebook was developed and refined until interrater reliability was confirmed with a kappa of > 0.9. Codes were organized into higher level themes. Results There were 72 participants, including 23 general surgery residents, 19 emergency medicine residents, and 30 emergency medicine nurses. 214 primary codes were collapsed into 29 coding categories, with 6 emerging themes. Pre-trauma bay impact describes how interactions prior to the trauma scenario can impact how team members communicate, trust one another, and ultimately care for the patient. Role and team identity explores the importance of one knowing their individual role in the trauma bay and how it impacts overall team identity. Resource allocation describes the balance of having appropriate resources to efficiently care for patients while not negatively impacting crowd control or role identity. Impact of the simulation experience highlights the impact of the lower stakes simulation scenario on learning and reflection as well as concerns with simulation fidelity. Trauma leader traits and actions outlines inherent traits and learned actions of trauma leaders that impact how the trauma scenario unfolds. Interprofessional team performance describes the overall performance of the trauma team, including but not limited to the type of communication used, teamwork behaviors, and transition of care of the patient. Conclusions Interdisciplinary trauma simulations and structured debriefing sessions provide insights into team dynamics and interprofessional relationships. Simulations and debriefing sessions can promote understanding, respect, and familiarity of team members' roles; recognition of key characteristics of high functioning leaders and teams; and discovery of conflict mitigating strategies for future interdisciplinary team improvement. Simulation sessions allow implementation of quality improvement measures and communication and leadership strategy practice in a safe, collaborative learning environment. The lessons learned from these sessions can encourage participants to reexamine how they interact and function as a team within the real-life trauma bay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristen Jogerst
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ USA
| | - Taylor Coe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Derek Monette
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Naomi Sell
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Isra Hamdi
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michael Sampson
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Emil Petrusa
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Dana Stearns
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Denise W. Gee
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Angela Chyn
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Noelle Saillant
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - James K. Takayesu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dace W, Purdy E, Brazil V. Wearing hats and blending boundaries: harmonising professional identities for clinician simulation educators. Adv Simul (Lond) 2022; 7:35. [PMID: 36303245 PMCID: PMC9615167 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-022-00229-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Many clinicians working in healthcare simulation struggle with competing dual identities of clinician and educator, whilst those who harmonise these identities are observed to be highly effective teachers and clinicians. Professional identity formation (PIF) theories offer a conceptual framework for considering this dilemma. However, many clinician simulation educators lack practical guidance for translating these theories and are unable to develop or align their dual identities. An unusual experience involving the first author’s suspension of disbelief as a simulation facilitator sparked a novel reflection on his dual identity as a clinician and as a simulation educator. He re-framed his clinician and simulation ‘hats’ as cooperative and fluid rather than competing and compartmentalised. He recognised that these dual identities could flow between clinical and simulation environments through leaky ‘blended boundaries’ rather than being restricted by environmental demarcations. This personal story is shared and reflected upon to offer a practical ‘hats and boundaries’ model. Experimenting with the model in both clinical and simulation workplaces presents opportunities for PIF and alignment of dual identities. The model may help other clinician simulation educators navigate the complexities of merging their dual identities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Dace
- Gold Coast University Hospital Emergency Department, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Eve Purdy
- Gold Coast University Hospital Emergency Department, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Victoria Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krishna Rao R, Horn Z, De Kruijf K, Twigg S. Daily team introductions and simulation education to improve team performance. Simul Healthc 2022. [DOI: 10.54531/fzni7126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zachary Horn
- 1Emergency Department, Logan Hospital, Logan, Australia
| | | | - Sonia Twigg
- 1Emergency Department, Logan Hospital, Logan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brazil V, McLean D, Lowe B, Kordich L, Cullen D, De Araujo V, Eldridge T, Purdy E. A relational approach to improving interprofessional teamwork in post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1108. [PMID: 36050714 PMCID: PMC9438096 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08463-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency that requires effective teamwork under complex conditions. We explored healthcare team performance for women who suffered a PPH, focusing on relationships and culture as critical influences on teamwork behaviours and outcomes. Methods In collaboration with clinical teams, we implemented structural, process and relational interventions to improve teamwork in PPH cases. We were guided by the conceptual framework of Relational Coordination and used a mixed methods approach to data collection and analysis. We employed translational simulation as a central, but not singular, technique for enabling exploration and improvement. Key themes were identified from surveys, focus groups, simulation sessions, interviews, and personal communications over a 12-month period. Results Four overarching themes were identified: 1) Teamwork, clear roles and identified leadership are critical. 2) Relational factors powerfully underpin teamwork behaviours—shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect. 3) Conflict and poor relationships can and should be actively explored and addressed to improve performance. 4) Simulation supports improved team performance through multifaceted mechanisms. One year after the project commenced, significant progress had been made in relationships and systems. Clinical outcomes have improved; despite unprecedented increase in labour ward activity, there has not been any increase in large PPHs. Conclusions Teamwork, relationships, and the context of care can be actively shaped in partnership with clinicians to support high performance in maternity care. We present our multifaceted approach as a guide for leaders and clinicians in maternity teams, and as an exemplar for others enacting quality improvement in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Darren McLean
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Belinda Lowe
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Lada Kordich
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Deborah Cullen
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| | | | - Talia Eldridge
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Eve Purdy
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gittell JH, Ali HN. Strengthening networks for healthcare integration: A commentary. Soc Sci Med 2022; 305:115036. [PMID: 35618600 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
In their paper "Integrating Network Theory into the Study of Integrated Healthcare," Burns, Nembhard and Shortell set out to change how we think about healthcare, and ultimately how we design and deliver healthcare. They aim to do this by focusing attention on the networks through which care is delivered, with particular attention to the relational dimensions of those networks. Inspired by social network, care integration, and relational coordination theories, Burns et al. (2022) offer recommendations for moving the healthcare sector toward a fresh approach to care integration that reflects the realities of relationships and networks. In this commentary, we analyze the main recommendations by Burns et al. and present our view of the field's current standing with regards to each of them. We then suggest potential research questions, contexts and designs to move this proposed work forward, drawing upon insights from a conversation with the authors in addition to their original article. We end by recommending the formation of a research collaborative to carry out the work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody Hoffer Gittell
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, USA.
| | - Hebatallah Naim Ali
- The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zisblatt L, Chen F, Dillman D, DiLorenzo AN, MacEachern MP, Juve AM, Peoples EE, Snarskis C, Grantham AE. Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2019. THE JOURNAL OF EDUCATION IN PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE : JEPM 2022; 24:1-21. [PMID: 36051403 PMCID: PMC9426260 DOI: 10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_zisblatt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study reviews and appraises the articles published about anesthesiology education in 2019. Through this critical appraisal, those interested in anesthesiology education are able to quickly review literature published during this year and explore innovative ways to improve education for all those involved in the practice of anesthesiology. METHODS Three Ovid MEDLINE databases, Embase.com, ERIC, and PsycINFO were searched followed by a manual review of articles published in the highest impact factor journals in both the fields of anesthesiology and medical education. Abstracts were double-screened and quantitative articles were subsequently scored by 3 randomly assigned raters. Qualitative studies were scored by 2 raters. Two different rubrics were used for scoring quantitative and qualitative studies; both allowed for scores ranging from 1 to 25. In addition, reviewers rated each article on its overall quality to create an additional list of top articles based solely on the opinion of the reviewers. RESULTS A total of 2374 unique citations were identified through the search criteria and the manual review. Of those, 70 articles met the inclusion criteria (62 quantitative and 8 qualitative). The top 12 quantitative papers and the top 2 qualitative papers with the highest scores were reported and summarized.Conclusions: This critical appraisal continues to be a useful tool for those working in anesthesiology education by highlighting the best research articles published over the year. Highlighting trends in medical education research in anesthesiology can help those in the field to think critically about the direction of this type of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Zisblatt
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Fei Chen
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Dawn Dillman
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Amy N. DiLorenzo
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Mark P. MacEachern
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Amy Miller Juve
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Emily E. Peoples
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Connor Snarskis
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Ashley E. Grantham
- The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI: Lara Zisblatt is Education Specialist; Emily E. Peoples is Assistant Professor, Director of Anesthesia Internship, and Associate Program Director of Education; and Connor Snarskis is Anesthesiology Resident. Fei Chen is Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR: Dawn Dillman is Professor, and Amy Miller Juve is Associate Professor. Amy N. DiLorenzo is Assistant Dean of Graduate Medical Education at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, and Education Specialist and Senior Lecturer in the Department of Anesthesiology at University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY. Mark P. MacEachern is Informationist in the Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Ashley E. Grantham is Medical Education Learning Specialist in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Purdy E, Borchert L, El-Bitar A, Isaacson W, Bills L, Brazil V. Taking simulation out of its "safe container"-exploring the bidirectional impacts of psychological safety and simulation in an emergency department. Adv Simul (Lond) 2022; 7:5. [PMID: 35123580 PMCID: PMC8818167 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-022-00201-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simulation facilitators strive to ensure the psychological safety of participants during simulation events; however, we have limited understanding of how antecedent levels of psychological safety impact the simulation experience or how the simulation experience impacts real-world psychological safety. METHODS We explored the experience of participants in an embedded, interprofessional simulation program at a large tertiary emergency department (ED) in Australia. We engaged in theoretical thematic analysis of sequential narrative surveys and semi-structured interviews using a previously derived framework of enablers of psychological safety in healthcare. We sought to understand (1) how real-world psychological safety impacts the simulation experience and (2) how the simulation experience influences real-world psychological safety. RESULTS We received 74 narrative responses and conducted 19 interviews. Simulation experience was both influenced by and impacted psychological safety experienced at the individual, team, and organizational levels of ED practice. Most strikingly, simulation seemed to be an incubator of team familiarity with direct impact on real-world practice. We present a model of the bidirectional impact of psychological safety and simulation within healthcare environments. CONCLUSION Our model represents both opportunity and risk for facilitators and organizations engaging in simulation. It should inform objectives, design, delivery, debriefing, and faculty development and firmly support the situation of simulation programs within the broader cultural ethos and goals of the departments and organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Purdy
- Gold Coast University Hospital Emergency Department, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Laura Borchert
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anthony El-Bitar
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Warwick Isaacson
- Gold Coast University Hospital Emergency Department, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lucy Bills
- Gold Coast University Hospital Emergency Department, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Victoria Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Obstetric anesthesiologists provide care under unique conditions, where frequently unscheduled cases demand flexibility in thinking and acting. And although most obstetric patients may be healthy, they can quickly deteriorate, necessitating rapid team diagnostic and treatment interventions. Examining decision making is a critical step in improving care to these patients. This article reviews evidence-based models of decision making both with individuals and with teams, and presents strategies to improve decision making under any circumstance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca D Minehart
- Obstetric Anesthesia Division, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 440, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Daniel Katz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, The Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York City, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rudolph JW, Pian-Smith MCM, Minehart RD. Setting the stage for speaking up: psychological safety and directing care in acute care collaboration. Br J Anaesth 2021; 128:3-7. [PMID: 34776122 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Revised: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Managing a safe and efficient anaesthetic induction within a team involves the challenge of when, if, and how to surface, discuss, and implement the best plan on how to proceed. The Lemke and colleagues study in this issue of the British Journal of Anaesthesia is a unique view into real-world conversations that naturally occur in anaesthesia teams in moments of high task and cognitive load, such as induction of anaesthesia. The study spotlights important small moments of physician, nurse, and trainee team coordination. It illuminates key patterns of conversation in naturally occurring anaesthesia teams, and raises important questions about what the speaking up standard should be and the psychological safety-shaping role consultants play in setting the norms for speaking up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny W Rudolph
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Medical Simulation, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - May C M Pian-Smith
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Medical Simulation, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca D Minehart
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Medical Simulation, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pillay T, Clarke L, Abbott L, Surana P, Shenvi A, Deshpande S, Cookson J, Nash M, Fawke J, Rasiah V, Cusack J. Optimising frontline learning and engagement between consultant-led neonatal teams in the West Midlands: a survey on the utility of an augmented simulation training technique. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021; 6:29. [PMID: 34454614 PMCID: PMC8401370 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-021-00181-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In England, neonatal care is delivered in operational delivery networks, comprising a combination of the Neonatal Intensive Care (NICU), Local-Neonatal (LNU) or Special-Care Units (SCU), based on their ability to care for babies with different degrees of illness or prematurity. With the development of network care pathways, the most premature and sickest are mostly triaged for delivery in services linked to NICU. This has created anxiety for teams in LNU and SCU. Less exposure to sicker babies has resulted in limited opportunities to maintain expertise for when these babies unexpectedly deliver at their centre and thereafter require transfer for care, to NICU. Simultaneously, LNU and SCU teams develop skills in the care of the less ill and premature baby which would also be of benefit to NICU teams. A need for mutual learning through inter-unit multidirectional collaborative learning and engagement (hereafter also called neonatal networking) between teams of different designations emerged. Here, neonatal networking is defined as collaboration, shared clinical learning and developing an understanding of local systems strengths and challenges between units of different and similar designations. We describe the responses to the development of a clinical and systems focussed platform for this engagement between different teams within our neonatal ODN. Method An interactive 1-day programme was developed in the West Midlands, focussing on a non-hierarchical, equal partnership between neonatal teams from different unit designations. It utilised simulation around clinical scenarios, with a slant towards consultant engagement. Four groups rotating through four clinical simulation scenarios were developed. Each group participated in a clinical simulation scenario, led by a consultant and supported by nurses and doctors in training together with facilitators, with a further ~two consultants, as observers within the group. All were considered learners. Consultant candidates took turns to be participants and observers in the simulation scenarios so that at the end of the day all had led a scenario. Each simulation-clinical debrief session was lengthened by a further ~ 20 min, during which freestyle discussion with all learners occurred. This was to promote further bonding, through multidirectional sharing, and with a systems focus on understanding the strengths and challenges of practices in different units. A consultant focus was adopted to promote a long-term engagement between units around shared care. There were four time points for this neonatal networking during the course of the day. Qualitative assessment and a Likert scale were used to assess this initiative over 4 years. Results One hundred fifty-five individuals involved in frontline neonatal care participated. Seventy-seven were consultants, supported by neonatal trainees, staff grade doctors, clinical fellows, advanced neonatal nurse practitioners and nurses in training. All were invited to participate in the survey. The survey response rate was 80.6%. Seventy-nine percent felt that this learning strategy was highly relevant; 96% agreed that for consultants this was appropriate adult learning. Ninety-eight percent agreed that consultant training encompassed more than bedside clinical management, including forging communication links between teams. Thematic responses suggested that this was a highly useful method for multi-directional learning around shared care between neonatal units. Conclusion Simulation, enhanced with systems focussed debrief, appeared to be an acceptable method of promoting multidirectional learning within neonatal teams of differing designations within the WMNODN. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-021-00181-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thillagavathie Pillay
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. .,Faculty of Science and Engineering, RIHS, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK. .,College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | - Lynsey Clarke
- West Midlands Neonatal Operational Delivery Network, Solihull, UK.,University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Lee Abbott
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, UK
| | - Pinki Surana
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Asha Shenvi
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | | | - Joanne Cookson
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, UK
| | - Matthew Nash
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joe Fawke
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Vishna Rasiah
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Cusack
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.,College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hale SJ, Wakeling S, Bhalerao A, Balakumaran J, Huang S, Mondoux S, Blain JB, Chan TM. Feeling the flow with a serious game workshop: GridlockED as Medical Education 2 study (GAME2 study). AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2021; 5:e10576. [PMID: 34124522 PMCID: PMC8171742 DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE GridlockED gameplay workshops were delivered in Canada. This project investigated workshop attendees' experiences, seeking to identify learning points to inform improvement of the workshop. METHODS GridlockED sessions were held through 2018 and 2019. Workshops targeted medical trainees. After a standardized video, learners played for approximately 90 minutes. Learners completed a postgameplay survey with 7-point Likert scale questions about their experience. RESULTS Seventy-two participants responded to our survey (41 medical students, 13 physician assistant students, 12 emergency medicine residents, and six faculty members). Trainees rated GridlockED as both enjoyable and a meaningful educational experience, with a mean (±SD) rating of 6.53 (±0.96) of 7 for enjoyment and 6.17 (±1.13) for education. Attendees identified teamwork and communication (49%) as the most helpful learning domain, with patient flow (43%) being second and basics of how the ED worked (31%) being third. The respondents self-identified top areas of learning as resource management (38.9%), improved understanding of various provider roles in the ED (33%), and improved communication skills (33%). CONCLUSION Medical learners identified GridlockED to be an educational and enjoyable learning experience. Attendees reported that playing this serious game assisted with learning about health systems and communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen J. Hale
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Emergency Medicine Residency Training ProgramUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Sonja Wakeling
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Emergency Medicine Residency Training ProgramMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Anuja Bhalerao
- Canadian College of Family Physicians Residency Training ProgramQueen's UniversityKingstonOntarioCanada
| | - Janatani Balakumaran
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Emergency Medicine Residency Training ProgramMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - Simon Huang
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Emergency Medicine Residency Training ProgramDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Shawn Mondoux
- Division of Emergency MedicineDepartment of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
- McMaster Program for Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERITHamiltonOntarioCanada
| | - J. Bruce Blain
- School of ManagementGeorge Brown CollegeTorontoOntarioCanada
- Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Teresa M. Chan
- Program for Faculty DevelopmentFaculty of Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
- Department of MedicineDivision of Emergency Medicine and Division of Education & InnovationMcMaster UniversityHamiltonOntarioCanada
- McMaster Program for Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERITHamiltonOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Monette DL, Hegg DD, Chyn A, Gordon JA, Takayesu JK. A Guide for Medical Educators: How to Design and Implement In Situ Simulation in an Academic Emergency Department to Support Interprofessional Education. Cureus 2021; 13:e14965. [PMID: 33996338 PMCID: PMC8112813 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In situ simulation (ISS) put simulation training directly into the clinical practice environment. Although ISS creates opportunities to identify latent system threats, understand culture, and improve team dynamics, there are limited resources for medical educators to guide the development and implementation of ISS at academic (or community-based) emergency departments (EDs). We describe the implementation of ISS in a high-volume urban ED to help educators understand the requirements and limitations of successful program design. During an academic year, 66 individual learners participated in at least one of our 22 training sessions, a cohort that included 37 nurses, 17 physicians, eight physician assistants, and four allied health professionals. Feedback from these participants and case facilitators informed our iterative process of review and development of program guidelines and best practices. We share these key technical points and the themes we found to be essential to the successful implementation of an ISS program: consideration of session timing, participant buy-in, flexibility, and threats to professional identity. Overall, our report demonstrates the feasibility of implementing an ISS program in a high-volume urban ED and provides medical educators with a guide for creating an ISS program for interprofessional education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek L Monette
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Daniel D Hegg
- Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, USA
| | - Angela Chyn
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - James A Gordon
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - James K Takayesu
- Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nickson CP, Petrosoniak A, Barwick S, Brazil V. Translational simulation: from description to action. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021; 6:6. [PMID: 33663603 PMCID: PMC7930894 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-021-00160-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
This article describes an operational framework for implementing translational simulation in everyday practice. The framework, based on an input-process-output model, is developed from a critical review of the existing translational simulation literature and the collective experience of the authors' affiliated translational simulation services. The article describes how translational simulation may be used to explore work environments and/or people in them, improve quality through targeted interventions focused on clinical performance/patient outcomes, and be used to design and test planned infrastructure or interventions. Representative case vignettes are used to show how the framework can be applied to real world healthcare problems, including clinical space testing, process development, and culture. Finally, future directions for translational simulation are discussed. As such, the article provides a road map for practitioners who seek to address health service outcomes using translational simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Peter Nickson
- Intensive Care Unit and Centre for Health Innovation, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Andrew Petrosoniak
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephanie Barwick
- Mater Education, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Victoria Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Purdy EI, McLean D, Alexander C, Scott M, Donohue A, Campbell D, Wullschleger M, Berkowitz G, Winearls J, Henry D, Brazil V. Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care. BMJ Open Qual 2020; 9:bmjoq-2019-000749. [PMID: 32046977 PMCID: PMC7047507 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trauma care represents a complex patient journey, requiring multidisciplinary coordinated care. Team members are human, and as such, how they feel about their colleagues and their work affects performance. The challenge for health service leaders is enabling culture that supports high levels of collaboration, co-operation and coordination across diverse groups. We aimed to define and improve relational aspects of trauma care at Gold Coast University Hospital. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods collaborative ethnography using the relational coordination survey—an established tool to analyse the relational dimensions of multidisciplinary teamwork—participant observation, interviews and narrative surveys. Findings were presented to clinicians in working groups for further interpretation and to facilitate co-creation of targeted interventions designed to improve team relationships and performance. Findings We engaged a complex multidisciplinary network of ~500 care providers dispersed across seven core interdependent clinical disciplines. Initial findings highlighted the importance of relationships in trauma care and opportunities to improve. Narrative survey and ethnographic findings further highlighted the centrality of a translational simulation programme in contributing positively to team culture and relational ties. A range of 16 interventions—focusing on structural, process and relational dimensions—were co-created with participants and are now being implemented and evaluated by various trauma care providers. Conclusions Through engagement of clinicians spanning organisational boundaries, relational aspects of care can be measured and directly targeted in a collaborative quality improvement process. We encourage healthcare leaders to consider relationship-based quality improvement strategies, including translational simulation and relational coordination processes, in their efforts to improve care for patients with complex, interdependent journeys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Isabelle Purdy
- Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada .,Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Darren McLean
- Centre for Health Innovation, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Charlotte Alexander
- Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Matthew Scott
- Trauma Service, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Donohue
- Anaesthetics, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Don Campbell
- Trauma Service/Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Martin Wullschleger
- Trauma Service/General Surgery, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gary Berkowitz
- High Acuity Response Unit, Queensland Ambulance Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - James Winearls
- Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Doug Henry
- Department of Anthropology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA
| | - Victoria Brazil
- Emergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chan AKM, Rudolph JW, Lau VNM, Wong HMK, Wong RSL, Lo TSF, Choi GYS, Joynt GM. Rapid cycle system improvement for COVID-19 readiness: integrating deliberate practice, psychological safety and vicarious learning. BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING 2020. [PMID: 37534688 PMCID: PMC7441440 DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Introduction In the face of a rapidly advancing pandemic with uncertain pathophysiology, pop-up healthcare units, ad hoc teams and unpredictable personal protective equipment supply, it is difficult for healthcare institutions and front-line teams to invent and test robust and safe clinical care pathways for patients and clinicians. Conventional simulation-based education was not designed for the time-pressured and emergent needs of readiness in a pandemic. We used ‘rapid cycle system improvement’ to create a psychologically safe learning oasis in the midst of a pandemic. This oasis provided a context to build staff technical and teamwork capacity and improve clinical workflows simultaneously. Methods At the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care in Prince of Wales Hospital, a tertiary institution, in situ simulations were carried out in the operating theatres and intensive care unit (ICU). The translational simulation design leveraged principles of psychological safety, rapid cycle deliberate practice, direct and vicarious learning to ready over 200 staff with 51 sessions and achieve iterative system improvement all within 7 days. Staff evaluations and system improvements were documented postsimulation. Results/Findings Staff in both operating theatres and ICU were significantly more comfortable and confident in managing patients with COVID-19 postsimulation. Teamwork, communication and collective ability to manage infectious cases were enhanced. Key system issues were also identified and improved. Discussion To develop readiness in the rapidly progressing COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrated that ‘rapid cycle system improvement’ can efficiently help achieve three intertwined goals: (1) ready staff for new clinical processes, (2) build team competence and confidence and (3) improve workflows and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Kam Ming Chan
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Jenny W Rudolph
- Center for Medical Simulation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vivian Nga Man Lau
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Henry Man Kin Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Rosinni Si Ling Wong
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Thomas S F Lo
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Gordon Y S Choi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Gavin Matthew Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Medicine, New Territories, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brazil V, Lowe B, Ryan L, Bourke R, Scott C, Myers S, Kaneko H, Schweitzer J, Shanahan B. Translational simulation for rapid transformation of health services, using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic preparation. Adv Simul (Lond) 2020; 5:9. [PMID: 32514386 PMCID: PMC7267758 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-020-00127-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare simulation has significant potential for helping health services to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid changes to care pathways and processes needed for protection of staff and patients may be facilitated by a translational simulation approach-diagnosing changes needed, developing and testing new processes and then embedding new systems and teamwork through training. However, there are also practical constraints on running in situ simulations during a pandemic-the need for physical distancing, rigorous infection control for manikins and training equipment and awareness of heightened anxiety among simulation participants. We describe our institution's simulation strategy for COVID-19 preparation and reflect on the lessons learned-for simulation programs and for health services seeking to utilise translational simulation during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. We offer practical suggestions for a translational simulation strategy and simulation delivery within pandemic constraints. We also suggest simulation programs develop robust strategies, governance and relationships for managing change within institutions-balancing clinician engagement, systems engineering expertise and the power of translational simulation for diagnosing, testing and embedding changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Brazil
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Belinda Lowe
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Leanne Ryan
- Department of Anaesthesia, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Rachel Bourke
- Department of Anaesthesia, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Clare Scott
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Simone Myers
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Hellen Kaneko
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Jane Schweitzer
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| | - Brenton Shanahan
- Simulation Service, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
We judge each other every day using demographic characteristics (such as gender and race/ethnicity), and these social identities shape our lives in profound ways. The impacts of demographic diversity in perioperative teams are poorly understood, and mixed results are reported in other team-based work settings. Drawing from decades' worth of organizational behavior literature, the authors propose a model of critical factors related to interplays between diversity, communication, and conflict, all which take place in a hierarchical environment influenced by power differences. Evidence-based recommendations are provided, aimed at maximizing benefits of diversity in perioperative teams while minimizing negative consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca D Minehart
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 440, Boston MA 02114, USA.
| | - Erica Gabrielle Foldy
- Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, 295 Lafayette Street, New York, NY 10012, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tobiano G, Ting C, Ryan C, Jenkinson K, Scott L, Marshall AP. Front-line nurses' perceptions of intra-hospital handover. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29:2231-2238. [PMID: 32043671 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIM AND OBJECTIVE To explore nurses' perceptions of factors that help or hinder intra-hospital handover. BACKGROUND Miscommunication during clinical handover is a leading cause of clinical incidents in hospitals. Intra-hospital nursing handover between the emergency department and inpatient unit is particularly complex. DESIGN A descriptive, qualitative study. This research adheres to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. METHODS Forty-nine nurses participated in group interviews, which were analysed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS Three categories emerged: (a) "lacking clear responsibilities for who provides handover"; (b) "strategies to ensure continuity of information"; and (c) "strained relationships during handover." CONCLUSIONS Intra-hospital handover requires clear processes, to promote high-quality information sharing. Ensuring these processes are broad and acceptable across units may ensure nurses' needs are met. Relational continuity between nurses is an important consideration when improving intra-hospital handover. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Nursing managers are optimally positioned to enhance intra-hospital handover, by liaising and enforcing standardisation of processes across units. Nurse managers could promote intra-unit activities that foster front-line nurses' communication with each other, to encourage problem-solving and partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lucie Scott
- Gold Coast Health, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- Gold Coast Health, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Robotic surgery has rapidly evolved. It is particularly attractive as an alternative minimally invasive approach in liver surgery because of improvements in visualization and articulated instruments. Limitations include increased operative times and lack of tactile feedback, but these have not been shown in studies. Considerations unique to robotic surgery, including safety protocols, must be put in place and be reviewed at the beginning of every procedure to ensure safety in the event of an emergent conversion. Despite the lack of early adoption by many hepatobiliary surgeons, robotic liver surgery continues to evolve and find its place within hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock Building, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Camille Stewart
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Abigail Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA; Department of Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brazil V, Purdy EI, Bajaj K. Connecting simulation and quality improvement: how can healthcare simulation really improve patient care? BMJ Qual Saf 2019; 28:862-865. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|