Inhospital cardiac arrest - the crucial first 5 min: a simulation study

Knowledge of the nursing team about cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: mixed methods studies

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the knowledge and perceptions of the nursing team about arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults before and after in situ simulation in emergency care.

METHOD

A sequential explanatory mixed methods study conducted in an Emergency Care Unit. Quantitative data were obtained through pre- and post-simulation questionnaire answered by 21 professionals and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The qualitative data was obtained through individual structured interviews with 19 professionals, analyzed according to thematic content analysis. The data was combined through connection.

RESULTS

In situ simulation did not significantly change pre- and post-simulation knowledge. Hand positioning for cardiac compressions and handling the automatic external defibrillator had the lowest number of correct answers. The qualitative data indicated difficulties related to knowledge, such as lack of training and insufficient experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences were identified in the proportions of answers obtained through the pre- and post-simulation in situ questionnaire regarding correct answers and wrong answers. Furthermore, the qualitative data reinforced the professionals' lack of experience in critical situations, the lack of training and ongoing studies on the subject.

Management of Paediatric Cardiac Arrest due to Shockable Rhythm-A Simulation-Based Study at Children's Hospitals in a German Federal State

(1) Background: To improve the quality of emergency care for children, the Hessian Ministry for Social Affairs and Integration offered paediatric simulation-based training (SBT) for all children's hospitals in Hesse. We investigated the quality of paediatric life support (PLS) in simulated paediatric resuscitations before and after SBT. (2) Methods: In 2017, a standardised, high-fidelity, two-day in-house SBT was conducted in 11 children's hospitals. Before and after SBT, interprofessional teams participated in two study scenarios (PRE and POST) that followed the same clinical course of apnoea and cardiac arrest with a shockable rhythm. The quality of PLS was assessed using a performance evaluation checklist. (3) Results: 179 nurses and physicians participated, forming 47 PRE and 46 POST interprofessional teams. Ventilation was always initiated. Before SBT, chest compressions (CC) were initiated by 87%, and defibrillation by 60% of teams. After SBT, all teams initiated CC (p = 0.012), and 80% defibrillated the patient (p = 0.028). The time to initiate CC decreased significantly (PRE 123 ± 11 s, POST 76 ± 85 s, p = 0.030). (4) Conclusions: The quality of PLS in simulated paediatric cardiac arrests with shockable rhythm was poor in Hessian children's hospitals and improved significantly after SBT. To improve children's outcomes, SBT should be mandatory for paediatric staff and concentrate on the management of shockable rhythms.

Endovascular aortic occlusion improves return of spontaneous circulation after longer periods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A translational study in pigs

Introduction

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as an adjunct to CPR for nontraumatic cardiac arrest (NTCA). This translational study investigated the impact of varying low-flow duration (15- vs 30-mins) on REBOA's hemodynamic performance and ability to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a porcine model.

Methods

Thirty-two pigs were anesthetized and placed into ventricular fibrillation. All animals received a 4-min no-flow period before CPR was initiated. Animals were randomized into four groups: 15- vs 30-minutes of CPR; REBOA vs. no-REBOA. After completion of 15- or 30-minute low-flow, ACLS was initiated and REBOA was inflated in experimental animals.

Results

In the 15-mins groups, there were no differences in the rates of ROSC between REBOA (4/8, 50%) and control (4/8, 50%; p = 0.99). However, in the 30-min groups, the REBOA animals had a significantly higher rate of ROSC (6/8, 75%) compared to control (1/8, 12.5%; p = 0.04). In the 7-mins after REBOA deployment in the 30-min animals there was a statistically significant difference in coronary perfusion pressure (REBOA 42.1 mmHg, control 3.6 mmHg, p = 0.038). Importantly, 5/6 animals that obtained ROSC in the 30-min group with REBOA re-arrested at least once, with 3/6 maintaining ROSC until study completion.

Conclusion

In our porcine model of NTCA, REBOA preferentially improved hemodynamics and ROSC after a 30-mins period of low-flow CPR. REBOA may be a viable strategy to improve ROSC after prolonged downtime, however, more hemodynamic support will be required to maintain ROSC.

Compliance with cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in witnessed in-hospital cardiac arrest events and patient outcome on monitored versus non-monitored wards

BACKGROUND

Adherence to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines in treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been associated with favourable patient outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate if compliance with initial CPR guidelines and patient outcome of witnessed IHCA events were associated with the place of arrest defined as monitored versus non-monitored ward.

METHODS

A total of 956 witnessed IHCA events in adult patients at six hospitals during 2018 to 2019, were extracted from the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Initial CPR guidelines were: ≤1 min from collapse to alert of the rapid response team, ≤1 min from collapse to start of CPR, ≤3 min from collapse to defibrillation of shockable rhythm.

RESULTS

The odds of compliance with guidelines was higher on monitored wards vs non-monitored wards, even after adjustment for factors that could affect staffing and resources. The place of arrest was not a significant factor for sustained return of spontaneous circulation, survival at 30 days, or neurological status at discharge, when adjusting for clinically relevant confounders. Compliance with initial CPR guidelines remained a significant factor for survival to 30 days and favourable neurological outcome at discharge regardless of other confounders.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with initial CPR guidelines was higher in witnessed IHCA events on monitored wards than on non-monitored wards, which indicates that healthcare professionals in monitored wards are quicker to recognize a cardiac arrest and initiate treatment. When initial CPR guidelines are followed, the place of arrest does not influence patient outcome.

In-situ simulations to detect patient safety threats during in-hospital cardiac arrest

Introduction

Errors during treatment may affect patient outcomes and can include errors in treatment algorithms, teamwork, and system errors. In-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA) require immediate and effective treatment, and delays are known to reduce survival. In-situ simulation is a tool that can be used to study emergency responses, including IHCA. We investigated system errors discovered during unannounced in-situ simulated IHCA.

Method

This multicenter cohort study included unannounced, full-scale IHCA in-situ simulations followed by a debriefing based on PEARLS with plus-delta used in the analysis phase. Simulations and debriefings were video-recorded for subsequent analysis. System errors observed were categorized by thematic analysis and analyzed for clinical implications. Errors related to treatment algorithm and clinical performance were excluded.

Results

We conducted 36 in-situ simulations across 4 hospitals with a total discovery of 30 system errors. On average, we discovered 0.8 system errors per simulation within the categories: human, organizational, hardware, or software errors. Of these, 25 errors (83%) had direct treatment consequences. System errors caused treatment delays in 15 cases, a need for alternative actions in 6 cases, omission of actions in 4 cases, and other consequences in 5 cases.

Conclusion

Using unannounced in-situ simulations, we identified almost one system error per simulation, and most of these errors were deemed to impact treatment negatively. The errors affected treatment by either causing delays, need for alternative treatment options, or omitting treatment actions. We suggest that hospitals focus on the need for regular testing of the emergency response by conducting full-scale unannounced in-situ simulations. This should be a priority to improve patient safety and care.