Infection prevention measures for patients undergoing hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire survey

Effects of coronavirus disease 2019 on the spread of respiratory-transmitted human-to-human bacteria

OBJECTIVES

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated significant changes in medical systems, social behaviours, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). We aimed to determine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on changes in the epidemiology of respiratory-transmitted bacteria that have been unexplored.

METHODS

We utilised a comprehensive national surveillance database from 2018 to 2021 to compare monthly number of patients with four respiratory-transmitted human-to-human bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pyogenes) before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, stratified by specimen sources and age groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of detected patients with S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and S. pyogenes from both respiratory and blood cultures significantly decreased from 2019 to 2020. In 2021, the incidence of detected patients with the respiratory-transmitted bacterial species, except for S. pyogenes, from respiratory cultures, increased again from April to July, primarily affecting the 0-4-year age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive national surveillance data analysis demonstrates the dynamic changes and effects of NPIs on respiratory-transmitted bacteria during the COVID-19 pandemic, with variations observed among species, specimen sources, and age groups.

The Impact and Treatment of COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.

METHODS

This paper outlines the impact of COVID-19, its treatment, and the efficacy of vaccines in Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis with a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing dialysis in dialysis facilities are at greater risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 than the general population due to limited isolation capabilities. Therefore, vaccines are expected to be effective for patients undergoing dialysis. In addition, effective use of available medications is important because treatment options are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts should be made to prevent the spread of the infection to high-risk patients undergoing dialysis while ensuring the effective use of vaccines.

Implementation of two novel schemes for patients on dialysis as a response to the COVID-19 surge in Tokyo

The Japanese government recommended hospitalization of patients on dialysis once they tested positive because of their high COVID-19 mortality rate and definite need for periodic dialysis. However, after experiencing the Delta variant surge, strategic changes towards outpatient care for mild or asymptomatic cases, along with strengthening emergency preparedness were needed. Facing the Omicron surge, the Tokyo Metropolitan Government introduced two novel schemes: i) a temporary medical facility with a dialysis center for infected patients on hemodialysis, which started admitting patients on dialysis on January 20, 2022, to provide additional bed capacity and access to hemodialysis and ii) a transportation scheme for patients who need travel to maintenance dialysis facilities from their homes, which was introduced on February 5. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government, cooperating with some nephrology experts, announced these schemes and urged local dialysis facilities to change strategies, providing information regarding infection prevention measures and treatments in online seminars on February 3 and 7. Consequently, promoting outpatient care did not lead to an increase in the case fatality ratio (CFR) in patients on dialysis with COVID-19 in Tokyo during the first Omicron surge (January 7 to February 10, 8.2%; February 11 to March 31, 5.5%). Furthermore, after an additional online seminar on July 20, the CFR dramatically declined in the second Omicron surge (July 8 to September 8, 1.2%). Implementation of public health intervention and careful communication with local dialysis facilities were both crucial to the strategic changes. To maintain essential health services, emergency preparedness should be cultivated during regular times.

COVID-19 and kidney disease: insights from epidemiology to inform clinical practice

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies have aimed to address the challenges faced by patients with kidney disease and their caregivers. These studies addressed areas of concern such as the high infection and mortality risk of patients on in-centre haemodialysis and transplant recipients. However, the ability to draw meaningful conclusions from these studies has in some instances been challenging, owing to barriers in aspects of usual care, data limitations and problematic methodological practices. In many settings, access to SARS-CoV-2 testing differed substantially between patient groups, whereas the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection varied over time and place because of differences in viral prevalence, targeted public health policies and vaccination rates. The absence of baseline kidney function data posed problems in the classification of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury in some studies, potentially compromising the generalizability of findings. Study findings also require attentive appraisal in terms of the effects of confounding, collider bias and chance. As this pandemic continues and in the future, the implementation of sustainable and integrated research infrastructure is needed in settings across the world to minimize infection transmission and both prevent and plan for the short-term and long-term complications of infectious diseases. Registries can support the real-world evaluation of vaccines and therapies in patients with advanced kidney disease while enabling monitoring of rare complications.

Patients with kidney disease are at particular risk of the adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Throughout the pandemic, epidemiological studies have been performed to inform clinical care; however, these studies have faced a number of methodological challenges. This Review discusses current understanding of the effects of COVID-19 on patients with kidney disease and some of the major obstacles encountered when conducting epidemiological research in a pandemic setting.

Patients who are receiving in-centre dialysis have a higher risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 than members of the general population, owing to their limited ability to isolate.

Studies have found a dose–response of increasing risk of mortality from COVID-19 with decreasing kidney function, with particularly high mortality seen in people with kidney failure and those on kidney replacement therapy.

Evidence of how infection risk can be mitigated in patients with chronic kidney disease is often of poor quality due to the many challenges of conducting epidemiological research in fragmented health-care settings.

Observational studies of associations between risk factors, such as chronic kidney disease or transplantation, and outcomes, such as COVID-19-related mortality, can be distorted as a result of collider bias, and thus care must be taken in study design and evaluation.

Recognizing the challenges that affect epidemiological studies in pandemic settings together with information on local health contexts enables rigorous assessment of study quality; adequate reporting of aspects relevant to local care availability enables readers to identify studies that contribute robust findings to the literature.

To confront the challenges wrought by future pandemics, a sustainable and integrated global infrastructure is needed to identify evidence-based approaches to minimize infection transmission and adverse outcomes.