Cost implications for the NHS of using the Alere™ i Influenza A & B near patient test with nasal swabs

Recommendations on Rapid Diagnostic Point-of-care Molecular Tests for Respiratory Infections in the United Arab Emirates

Traditional testing methods in the Middle East Region, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE), particularly the testing of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), influenza, group A streptococcus (GAS), and COVID-19 have the potential to be upgraded to new and advanced diagnostics methods that improve lead time to diagnosis, consumption of healthcare resources and patient experience. In addition, based on the research, it was reported that there is an underreporting of respiratory cases, overuse of antibiotics, and prolonged hospitalizations which is posing pressure on UAE healthcare stakeholders. A literature review was done exploring UAE's current diagnostic practices, recommended guidelines, diagnostic gaps, and challenges in RSV, GAS, Influenza, and COVID-19. This was followed by stakeholder discussions focusing on assessing current diagnostic practices, usage of rapid molecular point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tests, current gaps in diagnosis, targeted profiles for POC testing, and potential impact on patient management for targeted respiratory infections. A round table discussion with healthcare experts, insurance experts, key opinion leaders, and pulmonologists discussed challenges and opportunities in treating respiratory diseases. UAE healthcare stakeholders suggest that introducing alternative and up-to-date diagnostic methods such as POC molecular testing is expected to improve healthcare outcomes, optimize resources, and develop a robust case management of respiratory tract infections. It is essential to emphasize that by introducing POC testing, precision medicine is reinforced, efficiency is achieved, and the overall management of population health is enhanced.

Cost-consequence analysis of a combined COVID-19/influenza rapid diagnostic test in the Brazilian private healthcare setting

Combination COVID-19/influenza rapid tests provide a way to quickly and accurately differentiate between the two infections. The goal of this economic evaluation was to assess the cost and health benefits of a combination COVID-19/influenza Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) vs. current standard-of-care in the Brazilian private healthcare setting. A dual decision tree model was developed to estimate the impact of rapid differentiation of COVID-19 and influenza in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 adults with influenza-like illness in an ambulatory healthcare setting. The model compared the use of a combination COVID-19/influenza RDT to Brazil standard diagnostic practice of a COVID-19 RDT and presumptive influenza diagnosis. Different levels of influenza prevalence were modeled with co-infection estimated as a function of the COVID-19 prevalence. Outcomes included accuracy of diagnosis, antiviral prescriptions and healthcare resource use (hospital bed days and ICU occupancy). Depending on influenza prevalence, considering 1,000 patients with influenza-like illness, a combination RDT compared to standard practice was estimated to result in between 88 and 149 fewer missed diagnoses of influenza (including co-infection), 161 to 185 fewer cases of over-diagnosis of influenza; a 24 to 34% reduction in hospital bed days and a 16 to 26% reduction in ICU days. In the base case scenario (20% influenza, 5% COVID-19), the combination RDT was estimated to result in cohort cost savings of $99. Based upon a de novo economic model, this analysis indicates that use of a combination RDT could positively impact influenza antiviral prescriptions and lower healthcare resource use.

Missed opportunities to use rapid influenza testing and severity assessment to avoid hospital admission: A cohort study from an East London District General Hospital

Annual outbreaks of seasonal influenza cause a substantial health burden. The aim of this study was to compare patient demographic/clinical data in two influenza patient groups presenting to hospital; those requiring O2 or critical care admission and those requiring less intensive treatment. The study was conducted from 1 December 2017 until 1 April 2019 at a district general hospital in East London. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected for all patients who had tested influenza positive by near-patient testing. χ2 test was used for categorical variables to see if there were significant differences for those admitted and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the length of inpatient stay. Of 127 patients, 56 (44.1%) required oxygen or critical care. There were significant increases in National Early Warning Score (NEWS) observations (P %3C .001), Charlson comorbidity index (P = .049), length of inpatient stay (P %3C .001), and a strong association with increasing age (P = .066) when the more intensive treatment group was compared with the less intensive treatment group. A total of 13 (18.3%) of 71 patients not requiring oxygen or critical care were not admitted to the hospital. Following rapid influenza testing, NEWS scores, comorbidities, and age should be incorporated into a decision tool in Accident and Emergency to aid hospital admission or discharge decisions.

Impact of Rapid Influenza Molecular Testing on Management in Pediatric Acute Care Settings

OBJECTIVES

To measure the impact of rapid influenza real-time qualitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on patient management in busy pediatric emergency department (ED) and urgent care clinic settings.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a brief, elective survey that clinicians completed when an influenza RT-PCR order was placed in the ED or urgent care clinic between February 18, 2019, and March 13, 2019. We captured the clinical suspicion for influenza, intended management plans, and actual management plans once influenza RT-PCR results were available.

RESULTS

We evaluated 339 encounters, of which 164 (48.4%) had a positive influenza RT-PCR. Clinical suspicion for influenza was a nonsignificant predictor for influenza PT-PCR positivity (P = .126). After rapid influenza RT-PCR results were available, clinicians changed their original plans in 44.5% of influenza RT-PCR positive vs 92.6% of influenza RT-PCR negative cases (P < .0001). Change in plans for antiviral use was observed in 26% of influenza positive vs 77% of influenza negative cases (P < .0001). A total of 135 antiviral prescriptions were avoided in patients with negative influenza RT-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a rapid and accurate influenza RT-PCR in the acute care setting is important to systematically diagnose influenza in children and improve outpatient management decisions, because clinical suspicion for influenza is inaccurate. A negative influenza RT-PCR decreases unnecessary antiviral use and has the potential for significant cost savings.

Clinical usefulness of a rapid molecular assay, ID NOW™ influenza A & B 2, in adults

INTRODUCTION

ID NOW™ Influenza A & B 2 (ID NOW 2) is a rapid molecular assay that combines two characteristics, namely the rapidness of rapid antigen detection test (RADT) and the high sensitivity of molecular assay.

METHODS

The clinical performance of ID NOW 2 compared with real-time RT-PCR was evaluated in adults.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of ID NOW 2 over multiple seasons from 2016/2017 to 2019/2020 was 97.3% (95% CI: 90.7-99.7) for Type A, 100% (95% CI: 81.9-100) for Type B, and 97.8% (95% CI: 92.2-99.7) for influenza (Type A + Type B), and it was significantly higher than the sensitivity of RADT, which was 80.0% (95% CI: 69.2-88.4) for Type A, 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9-92.2) for Type B, and 78.9% (95% CI: 69.0-86.8) for influenza. The sensitivity of RADT tended to be lower in patients in the particularly early period, within 12 h from disease onset; however, the sensitivity of ID NOW 2 remained high, increasing the difference between the sensitivity of RADT and ID NOW 2. The viral loads were low within 12 h from onset, and it was considered this affected the sensitivity of RADT due to its low analytical sensitivity. The specificity of ID NOW 2 was 98% or greater in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Since ID NOW 2 has a high sensitivity and specificity in adults, it is anticipated to be used in clinical practice, particularly in patients who require early and accurate diagnosis.

Diagnostic and economic evaluation of a point-of-care test for respiratory syncytial virus

Respiratory syncytial virus is a common cause of bronchiolitis. Historically, point-of-care tests have involved antigen detection technology with limited sensitivity. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and model the economic impact of the Roche cobas® Liat® point-of-care influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus test.

The “DEC-RSV” study was a multi-centre, prospective, observational study in children under 2 years presenting with viral respiratory symptoms. A nasopharyngeal aspirate sample was tested using the point-of-care test and standard laboratory-based procedures. The primary outcome was accuracy of respiratory syncytial virus detection. The cost implications of adopting a point-of-care test were modelled using study data.

A total of 186 participants were recruited, with both tests performed on 177 samples. The point-of-care test was invalid for 16 samples (diagnostic yield 91%) leaving 161 available for primary analysis. After resolving discrepancies, the cobas® Liat® respiratory syncytial virus test had 100.00% (95% CI 96.07%–100.00%) sensitivity and 98.53% (95% CI 92.08%–99.96%) specificity. Median time to result was 0.6 h (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5–1) for point-of-care testing and 28.9 h (IQR 26.3–48.1) for standard laboratory testing. Estimated non-diagnostic cost savings for 1000 patients, based on isolation decision-making on point-of-care test result, were £57 010, which would increase to £94 847 when cohort nursing is used.

In young children the cobas® Liat® point-of-care respiratory syncytial virus test has high diagnostic accuracy using nasopharyngeal aspirates (currently an off-licence sample type). Time to result is clinically important and was favourable compared to laboratory-based testing. The potential exists for cost savings when adopting the point-of-care test.

This prospective evaluation of the cobas Liat point-of-care RSV test in children demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy using nasopharyngeal aspirate samples, with favourable time to result compared to usual laboratory-based testing procedureshttps://bit.ly/2yKKmUB

Clinical evaluation of ID NOW influenza A & B 2, a rapid influenza virus detection kit using isothermal nucleic acid amplification technology - A comparison with currently available tests

In this study, we evaluated the performance of ID NOW Influenza A & B 2 (ID NOW 2), a rapid molecular point-of-care test for influenza within 13 min, in comparison with currently available tests. A total of 254 nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and 271 nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) collected from 373 children and 152 adults with influenza-like illness were tested using ID NOW 2, viral culture, rapid antigen detection test, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification test to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity compared with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction as the reference method. The sensitivities of ID NOW 2 for influenza A were 95.9% and 95.7% in NPS and NPA, respectively, and for influenza B were 100% and 98.7% in NPS and NPA, respectively. The specificity was 100% for both influenza A and influenza B in NPS and NPA. Sensitivity of each test method reflected the difference of analytical sensitivity among the tests, and ID NOW 2 was not affected by time after illness onset and patient age. In conclusion, ID NOW 2 demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity that is useful for diagnosis of influenza in the clinical setting and infection control.