Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine

Prediction models for the complication incidence and survival rate of dental implants-a systematic review and critical appraisal

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to assess the performance, methodological quality and reporting transparency in prediction models for the dental implant's complications and survival rates.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Peer-reviewed studies that developed prediction models for dental implant's complications and survival rate were included. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias and reporting quality using the PROBAST and TRIPOD guidelines. The performance of the models were also compared in this study. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019122274).

RESULTS

The initial screening yielded 1769 publications, from which 14 studies featuring 43 models were selected. Four of the 14 studies predicted peri-implantitis as the most common outcome. Three studies predicted the marginal bone loss, two predicted suppuration of peri-implant tissue. The remaining five models predicted the implant loss, osseointergration or other complication. Common predictors included implant position, length, patient age, and a history of periodontitis. Sixteen models showed good to excellent discrimination (AUROC >0.8), but only three had undergone external validation. A significant number of models lacked model presentation. Most studies had a high or unclear risk of bias, primarily due to methodological limitation. The included studies conformed to 18-27 TRIPOD checklist items.

CONCLUSIONS

The current prediction models for dental implant complications and survival rate have limited methodological quality and external validity. There is a need for enhanced reliability, generalizability, and clinical applicability in future models.

Development and validation of a prediction model for coronary heart disease risk in depressed patients aged 20 years and older using machine learning algorithms

Background

Depression is being increasingly acknowledged as an important risk factor contributing to coronary heart disease (CHD). Currently, there is no predictive model specifically designed to evaluate the risk of coronary heart disease among individuals with depression. We aim to develop a machine learning (ML) model that will analyze risk factors and forecast the probability of coronary heart disease in individuals suffering from depression.

Methods

This research employed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007-2018, which included 2,085 individuals who had previously been diagnosed with depression. The population was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set, with an 8:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent risk factors for coronary heart disease in individuals with depression. Eight machine learning algorithms were applied to the training set to construct the model, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), classification and regression tree (CART), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and neural network (NNET). The validation set are used to evaluate the various performances of eight machine learning models. Several evaluation metrics were employed to assess and compare the performance of eight different machine learning models, aiming to identify the most effective algorithm for predicting coronary heart disease risk in individuals with depression. The evaluation metrics applied in this study included the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, Brier scores, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the precision-recall (PR) curve. And internally validated by the bootstrap method.

Results

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified age, chest pain status, history of myocardial infarction, serum triglyceride levels, and education level as independent predictors of coronary heart disease risk. Eight machine learning algorithms are applied to construct the models, among which the Random Forest model has the best performance, with an (Area Under Curve) AUC of 0.987 for the random forest model in the training set, and an AUC of 0.848 for the PR curve. In the validation set, the random forest model achieves an AUC of 0.996, and an AUC of 0.960 for the PR curve, which demonstrates an excellent discriminative ability. Calibration curves indicated high congruence between observed and predicted odds, with minimal Brier scores of 0.026 and 0.021 for the training, respectively, reinforcing the model's ability to discriminate. Set and validation set, respectively, reinforcing the model's predictive accuracy. DCA curves confirmed net benefits of the random forest model across. Furthermore, the AUC of the random forest model was 0.928 after internal validation by bootstrap method, indicating that its discriminative ability is good, and the model is useful for clinical assessment of the risk of coronary heart disease in depressed people.

Conclusion

The random forest algorithm exhibited the best predictive performance, potentially aiding clinicians in assessing the risk probabilities of coronary heart disease within this population.

Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection and its health technology assessment: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Recent healthcare advancements highlight the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) - and especially, among its subfields, Machine Learning (ML) - in enhancing Breast Cancer (BC) clinical care, leading to improved patient outcomes and increased radiologists' efficiency. While medical imaging techniques have significantly contributed to BC detection and diagnosis, their synergy with AI algorithms has consistently demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy, reduced False Positives (FPs), and enabled personalized treatment strategies. Despite the burgeoning enthusiasm for leveraging AI for early and effective BC clinical care, its widespread integration into clinical practice is yet to be realized, and the evaluation of AI-based health technologies in terms of health and economic outcomes remains an ongoing endeavor.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aims to investigate AI (and especially ML) applications that have been implemented and evaluated across diverse clinical tasks or decisions in breast imaging and to explore the current state of evidence concerning the assessment of AI-based technologies for BC clinical care within the context of Health Technology Assessment (HTA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist in PubMed and Scopus to identify relevant studies on AI (and particularly ML) applications in BC detection and diagnosis. We limited our search to studies published from January 2015 to October 2023. The Minimum Information about CLinical Artificial Intelligence Modeling (MI-CLAIM) checklist was used to assess the quality of AI algorithms development, evaluation, and reporting quality in the reviewed articles. The HTA Core Model® was also used to analyze the comprehensiveness, robustness, and reliability of the reported results and evidence in AI-systems' evaluations to ensure rigorous assessment of AI systems' utility and cost-effectiveness in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Of the 1652 initially identified articles, 104 were deemed eligible for inclusion in the review. Most studies examined the clinical effectiveness of AI-based systems (78.84%, n= 82), with one study focusing on safety in clinical settings, and 13.46% (n=14) focusing on patients' benefits. Of the studies, 31.73% (n=33) were ethically approved to be carried out in clinical practice, whereas 25% (n=26) evaluated AI systems legally approved for clinical use. Notably, none of the studies addressed the organizational implications of AI systems in clinical practice. Of the 104 studies, only two of them focused on cost-effectiveness analysis, and were analyzed separately. The average percentage scores for the first 102 AI-based studies' quality assessment based on the MI-CLAIM checklist criteria were 84.12%, 83.92%, 83.98%, 74.51%, and 14.7% for study design, data and optimization, model performance, model examination, and reproducibility, respectively. Notably, 20.59% (n=21) of these studies relied on large-scale representative real-world breast screening datasets, with only 10.78% (n =11) studies demonstrating the robustness and generalizability of the evaluated AI systems.

CONCLUSION

In bridging the gap between cutting-edge developments and seamless integration of AI systems into clinical workflows, persistent challenges encompass data quality and availability, ethical and legal considerations, robustness and trustworthiness, scalability, and alignment with existing radiologists' workflow. These hurdles impede the synthesis of comprehensive, robust, and reliable evidence to substantiate these systems' clinical utility, relevance, and cost-effectiveness in real-world clinical workflows. Consequently, evaluating AI-based health technologies through established HTA methodologies becomes complicated. We also highlight potential significant influences on AI systems' effectiveness of various factors, such as operational dynamics, organizational structure, the application context of AI systems, and practices in breast screening or examination reading of AI support tools in radiology. Furthermore, we emphasize substantial reciprocal influences on decision-making processes between AI systems and radiologists. Thus, we advocate for an adapted assessment framework specifically designed to address these potential influences on AI systems' effectiveness, mainly addressing system-level transformative implications for AI systems rather than focusing solely on technical performance and task-level evaluations.

Non-invasive infrared thermography for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of skin cancer

The incidence of skin cancer is rising continuously. The time of diagnosis is decisive for the morbidity and mortality risk of patients. An optimal screening procedure has yet to be established. Non-contact imaging methods are of great interest but have not yet been sufficiently developed and investigated for large-scale use. Compared to digital photography, infrared thermography offers the additional information of heat radiation from the skin surface, which correlates strongly with malignant changes. Literature on the current scientific status of screening, diagnosis and monitoring of skin cancer using thermographic procedures was identified in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. From a technical and information technology point of view, infrared thermography is very well suited for use as a non-invasive, cost-effective, time-saving, and easy-to-use screening instrument. However, there is still a lack of reliable evidence and practical implementation in 3D systems suitable for mass use. Research in this area should be intensified in order to develop, test and establish applicable systems on a large scale.

Artificial intelligence education in medical imaging: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The rise of Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping healthcare, particularly in medical imaging. In this emerging field, clinical imaging personnel need proper training. However, formal AI education is lacking in medical curricula, coupled with a shortage of studies synthesising the availability of AI curricula tailored for clinical imaging personnel. This study therefore addresses the question "what are the current AI training programs or curricula for clinical imaging personnel?"

METHODS

This review follows Arksey & O'Malley's framework and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Six electronic databases were searched between June and September 2023 and the screening process comprised two stages. Data extraction was performed using a standardised charting form. Data was summarised in table format and thematically.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included in this review. The goals of the curriculum include enhancing AI knowledge through the delivery of educational content and encouraging practical application and skills development in AI. The learning objectives comprise technical proficiency and model development, foundational knowledge and understanding, literature review and information utilisation, and practical application and problem-solving skills. Course content spanned nine areas, from fundamentals of AI to imaging informatics. Most curricula adopted an online mode of delivery, and the program duration varied significantly. All programs utilised didactic presentations, with several incorporating additional teaching methods and activities to fulfil curriculum goals. The target audiences and participants primarily involved radiology residents, while the creators and instructors comprised a multidisciplinary team of radiology and AI personnel. Various tools and resources were utilised, encompassing online courses and cloud-based notebooks. The curricula were well-received by participants, and time constraint emerged as a major challenge.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review provides an overview of the AI educational programs from existing literature to guide future developments in AI educational curricula. Future education efforts should prioritise evidence-based curriculum design, expand training offerings to radiographers, increase content offerings in imaging informatics, and effectively utilise different teaching strategies and training tools and resources in the curriculum.

The Transformative Impact of AI, Extended Reality, and Robotics in Interventional Radiology: Current Trends and Applications

Interventional Radiology is at the forefront of integrating advanced imaging techniques and minimally-invasive procedures to enhance patient care. The advent of Digital Health Technologies (DHTs), including artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, and extended reality (XR), is revolutionizing healthcare, particularly in IR due to its reliance on innovative technology and advanced imaging. Since 2016, the proportion of these DHT-related publications in IR has consistently increased. The proportion of AI-related studies published in IR was 69% higher than in surgery, XR-related studies were 94% higher, and robotics studies were 192% higher, indicating a more rapid growth rate in IR compared to surgery. This article explores the transformative impact of these technologies on IR, emphasizing their potential to enhance precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes. Despite the promising advancements, there is a lack of standardization and clinical consensus on the optimal use of DHTs in IR. The variability in IR procedures and imaging systems across hospitals complicates the standardization of workflows and comparison of studies. This underscores the importance of integrating DHTs as aids to IR practitioners rather than replacement, ensuring that these technologies enhance both clinical and procedural practice.

Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review

This narrative review explores the ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of AI integration in Australian healthcare, focusing on radiography. It examines the current legislative framework, assesses the trust and reliability of AI tools, and proposes future directions for ethical AI integration in radiography. AI systems significantly enhance diagnostic radiography by improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in stroke detection, brain imaging, and chest reporting. However, AI raises substantial ethical concerns due to its 'black-box' nature and potential biases in training data. The Therapeutic Goods Administration's reforms in Australia, though comprehensive, fall short of fully addressing issues related to the trustworthiness and legal liabilities of AI tools. Adopting a comprehensive research strategy that includes doctrinal, comparative, and public policy analyses will facilitate an understanding of international practices, particularly from countries with similar legal systems, and help guide Australia in refining its regulatory framework. For an ethical future in radiography, a robust, multi-disciplinary approach is required to prioritize patient safety, data privacy, and equitable AI use. A framework that balances technological innovation with ethical and legal integrity is essential for advancing healthcare while preserving trust and transparency. Healthcare professionals, policymakers, and AI developers must collaborate to establish a resilient, equitable, and transparent healthcare system. Future research should focus on multi-disciplinary methodologies, combining doctrinal, comparative, and public policy research to provide comprehensive insights. This approach will guide Australia in creating a more inclusive and ethically sound legal framework for AI in healthcare, ensuring its ethical and beneficial integration into radiography.

The knowledge and perception of patients in Malta towards artificial intelligence in medical imaging

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly implemented in radiology, especially in image reporting. Patients' perceptions about AI integration in medical imaging is a relatively unexplored area that has received limited investigation in the literature. This study aimed to determine current knowledge and perceptions of patients in Malta towards AI application in medical imaging.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a self-designed paper-based questionnaire, partly adapted with permission from two previous studies, was distributed in English or Maltese language amongst eligible outpatients attending medical imaging examinations across public hospitals in Malta and Gozo in March 2023.

RESULTS

280 questionnaires were analysed, resulting in a 5.83 % confidence interval. 42.1 % of patients indicated basic AI knowledge, while 36.4 % reported minimal to no knowledge. Responses indicated favourable opinions towards the collaborative integration of humans and AI to improve healthcare. However, participants expressed preference for doctors to retain final-decision making when AI is used. For some statements, a statistically significant association was observed between patients' perception of AI-based technology and their gender, age, and educational background. Essentially, 92.1 % expressed the importance of being informed whenever AI is to be utilised in their care.

DISCUSSION

As key stakeholders, patients should be actively involved when AI technology is used. Informing patients about the use of AI in medical imaging is important to cultivate trust, address ethical concerns, and help ensure that AI integration in healthcare systems aligns with patients' values and needs.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need to enhance AI literacy amongst patients, possibly though awareness campaigns or educational programmes. Additionally, clear policies relating to the use of AI in medical imaging and how such AI use is communicated to patients are necessary.

Interobserver variation affects accuracy of inference in life history studies using cementochronology

Objective

Cementochronology is a method for assessing chronological age and identifying other life-history parameters (LHPs) from incremental lines of acellular extrinsic fibre cementum (AEFC) in most mammalian teeth. The aim of this study is to question the accuracy of this technique when used as a stand-alone age estimation method, and to examine how the number of observers may alter accuracy.

Design

This research is based on an extant clinical study conducted on 10 human teeth with the patients' anamnestic data. Nine observers used cementochronology to count AEFC incremental lines from 82 digital images. The counting was performed at three non-standardised areas on each image, totalling 246 counts per observer. Resultant observer counts were compared using the coefficient of variation method.

Results

The mean deviation of cementum estimated age from known chronological age of the participants in the study is 5.2 years.

Conclusion

Our study shows that further critical examination of the current cementochronology technique is essential, due to the subjectivity of line counting. The number of skilled observers in the study may improve the overall accuracy of the technique. These issues have wider implications, as many researchers rely on accurate scientific inferences being made by cementum-based studies to support or refute overarching demographic models and grand evolutionary narratives grounded by life history theory. Until this issue is resolved cementochronology should only be used alongside other age estimation methods.

Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features

Feature extraction and selection from medical data are the basis of radiomics and image biomarker discovery for various architectures, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We herein describe the typical radiomics steps and the components of a CNN for both deep feature extraction and end-to-end approaches. We discuss the curse of dimensionality, along with dimensionality reduction techniques. Despite the outstanding performance of deep learning (DL) approaches, the use of handcrafted features instead of deep learned features needs to be considered for each specific study. Dataset size is a key factor: large-scale datasets with low sample diversity could lead to overfitting; limited sample sizes can provide unstable models. The dataset must be representative of all the "facets" of the clinical phenomenon/disease investigated. The access to high-performance computational resources from graphics processing units is another key factor, especially for the training phase of deep architectures. The advantages of multi-institutional federated/collaborative learning are described. When large language models are used, high stability is needed to avoid catastrophic forgetting in complex domain-specific tasks. We highlight that non-DL approaches provide model explainability superior to that provided by DL approaches. To implement explainability, the need for explainable AI arises, also through post hoc mechanisms. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This work aims to provide the key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers. KEY POINTS: The key concepts for processing the imaging features to extract reliable and robust image biomarkers are provided. The main differences between radiomics and representation learning approaches are highlighted. The advantages and disadvantages of handcrafted versus learned features are given without losing sight of the clinical purpose of artificial intelligence models.

Decoding Radiomics: A Step-by-Step Guide to Machine Learning Workflow in Hand-Crafted and Deep Learning Radiomics Studies

Although radiomics research has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous studies dedicated to the automated extraction of diagnostic and prognostic information from various imaging modalities, such as CT, PET, and MRI, only a small fraction of these findings has successfully transitioned into clinical practice. This gap is primarily due to the significant methodological challenges involved in radiomics research, which emphasize the need for a rigorous evaluation of study quality. While many technical aspects may lie outside the expertise of most radiologists, having a foundational knowledge is essential for evaluating the quality of radiomics workflows and contributing, together with data scientists, to the development of models with a real-world clinical impact. This review is designed for the new generation of radiologists, who may not have specialized training in machine learning or radiomics, but will inevitably play a role in this evolving field. The paper has two primary objectives: first, to provide a clear, systematic guide to radiomics study pipeline, including study design, image preprocessing, feature selection, model training and validation, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, given the critical importance of evaluating the robustness of radiomics studies, this review offers a step-by-step guide to the application of the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS, 2024)-a newly proposed tool for assessing the quality of radiomics studies. This roadmap aims to support researchers and reviewers alike, regardless of their machine learning expertise, in utilizing this tool for effective study evaluation.

Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: What Is Its True Role at Present, and Where Is the Evidence?

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology has brought about substantial advancements and transformative potential in diagnostic imaging practices. This study presents an overview of the current research on the application of AI in radiology, highlighting key insights from recent studies and surveys. These recent studies have explored the expected impact of AI, encompassing machine learning and deep learning, on the work volume of diagnostic radiologists. The present and future role of AI in radiology holds great promise for enhancing diagnostic capabilities, improving workflow efficiency, and ultimately, advancing patient care.

Radiomics for Predicting Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Insights from Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)

Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between radiomic features extracted from contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) tumor lesions and peritumoral background with prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC). Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, 134 women with histologically confirmed breast cancer underwent CEM examination. Radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented lesions and lesion contours were automatically delineated using PyRadiomics. The extracted features were categorized into seven classes: First-order Features, Shape Features (2D), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM), Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM), and Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM). Histological examination assessed tumor type, grade, receptor structure (ER, PgR, HER2), Ki67 index, and lymph node involvement. Pearson correlation and multivariate regression were applied to evaluate associations between radiomic features and prognostic factors. Results: Significant correlations were found between First-order Features and prognostic factors such as ER, PgR, and Ki67 (p < 0.05). GLCM-based texture features showed strong associations with Ki67 and HER2 (p < 0.01). Radiomic features from peritumoral regions, especially shape and GLSZM metrics, were significantly correlated with Ki67 and lymph node involvement. Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of both tumor and peritumoral regions offers significant insights into BC prognosis. These findings support the integration of radiomics into personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, potentially improving clinical decision making in BC management.

Evaluation of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Clinical Practice of Radiology in Saudi Arabia

Background

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming integral to the health sector, particularly radiology, because it enhances diagnostic accuracy and optimizes patient care. This study aims to assess the awareness and acceptance of AI among radiology professionals in Saudi Arabia, identifying the educational and training needs to bridge knowledge gaps and enhance AI-related competencies.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study surveyed radiology professionals across various hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited through multiple channels, including direct invitations, emails, social media, and professional societies. The survey comprised four sections: demographic details, perceptions of AI, knowledge about AI, and willingness to adopt AI in clinical practice.

Results

Out of 374 radiology professionals surveyed, 45.2% acknowledged AI's significant impact on their field. Approximately 44% showed enthusiasm for AI adoption. However, 58.6% reported limited AI knowledge and inadequate training, with 43.6% identifying skill development and the complexity of AI educational programs as major barriers to implementation.

Conclusion

While radiology professionals in Saudi Arabia are generally positive about integrating AI into clinical practice, significant gaps in knowledge and training need to be addressed. Tailored educational programs are essential to fully leverage AI's potential in improving medical imaging practices and patient care outcomes.

Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing Cancer Imaging: User Experience Study

BACKGROUND

The need for increased clinical efficacy and efficiency has been the main force in developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medical imaging. The INCISIVE project is a European Union-funded initiative aiming to revolutionize cancer imaging methods using AI technology. It seeks to address limitations in imaging techniques by developing an AI-based toolbox that improves accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To ensure the successful implementation of the INCISIVE AI service, a study was conducted to understand the needs, challenges, and expectations of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding the proposed toolbox and any potential implementation barriers.

METHODS

A mixed methods study consisting of 2 phases was conducted. Phase 1 involved user experience (UX) design workshops with users of the INCISIVE AI toolbox. Phase 2 involved a Delphi study conducted through a series of sequential questionnaires. To recruit, a purposive sampling strategy based on the project's consortium network was used. In total, 16 HCPs from Serbia, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Spain, and the United Kingdom participated in the UX design workshops and 12 completed the Delphi study. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp), enabling the calculation of mean rank scores of the Delphi study's lists. The qualitative data collected via the UX design workshops was analyzed using NVivo (version 12; Lumivero) software.

RESULTS

The workshops facilitated brainstorming and identification of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's desired features and implementation barriers. Subsequently, the Delphi study was instrumental in ranking these features, showing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.741, P<.001). Additionally, this study also identified implementation barriers, revealing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.705, P<.001). Key findings indicated that the INCISIVE AI toolbox could assist in areas such as misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, delays in diagnosis, detection of minor lesions, decision-making in disagreement, treatment allocation, disease prognosis, prediction, treatment response prediction, and care integration throughout the patient journey. Limited resources, lack of organizational and managerial support, and data entry variability were some of the identified barriers. HCPs also had an explicit interest in AI explainability, desiring feature relevance explanations or a combination of feature relevance and visual explanations within the toolbox.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a thorough examination of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's design elements as required by the end users and potential barriers to its implementation, thus guiding the design and implementation of the INCISIVE technology. The outcome offers information about the degree of AI explainability required of the INCISIVE AI toolbox across the three services: (1) initial diagnosis; (2) disease staging, differentiation, and characterization; and (3) treatment and follow-up indicated for the toolbox. By considering the perspective of end users, INCISIVE aims to develop a solution that effectively meets their needs and drives adoption.

Impact of AI on radiology: a EuroAIM/EuSoMII 2024 survey among members of the European Society of Radiology

In order to assess the perceptions and expectations of the radiology staff about artificial intelligence (AI), we conducted an online survey among ESR members (January-March 2024). It was designed considering that conducted in 2018, updated according to recent advancements and emerging topics, consisting of seven questions regarding demographics and professional background and 28 AI questions. Of 28,000 members contacted, 572 (2%) completed the survey. AI impact was predominantly expected on breast and oncologic imaging, primarily involving CT, mammography, and MRI, and in the detection of abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects. About half of responders did not foresee an impact of AI on job opportunities. For 273/572 respondents (48%), AI-only reports would not be accepted by patients; and 242/572 respondents (42%) think that the use of AI systems will not change the relationship between the radiological team and the patient. According to 255/572 respondents (45%), radiologists will take responsibility for any AI output that may influence clinical decision-making. Of 572 respondents, 274 (48%) are currently using AI, 153 (27%) are not, and 145 (25%) are planning to do so. In conclusion, ESR members declare familiarity with AI technologies, as well as recognition of their potential benefits and challenges. Compared to the 2018 survey, the perception of AI's impact on job opportunities is in general slightly less optimistic (more positive from AI users/researchers), while the radiologist's responsibility for AI outputs is confirmed. The use of large language models is declared not only limited to research, highlighting the need for education in AI and its regulations. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates the current impact of AI on radiology, revealing significant usage patterns and clinical implications, thereby guiding future integration strategies to enhance efficiency and patient care in clinical radiology. KEY POINTS: The survey examines ESR member's views about the impact of AI on radiology practice. AI use is relevant in CT and MRI, with varying impacts on job roles. AI tools enhance clinical efficiency but require radiologist oversight for patient acceptance.

The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning-A Literature Review

This paper examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy for cancer treatment. The importance of radiotherapy in cancer management and its time-intensive planning process make AI adoption appealing especially with the escalating demand for radiotherapy. This review highlights the efficacy of AI across medical domains, where it surpasses human capabilities in areas such as cardiology and dermatology. Focusing on radiotherapy, the paper details AI's applications in target segmentation, dose optimization, and outcome prediction. It discusses adaptive radiotherapy's benefits and AI's potential to enhance patient outcomes with much improved treatment accuracy. The paper explores ethical concerns, including data privacy and bias, stressing the need for robust guidelines. Educating healthcare professionals and patients about AI's role is crucial as it acknowledges potential job-role changes and concerns about patients' trust in the use of AI. Overall, the integration of AI in radiotherapy holds transformative potential in streamlining processes, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. AI's potential to reduce healthcare costs underscores its significance with impactful change globally. However, successful implementation hinges on addressing ethical and logistical challenges and fostering collaboration among healthcare professionals and patient population data sets for its optimal utilization. Rigorous education, collaborative efforts, and global data sharing will be the compass guiding its' success in radiotherapy and healthcare.

Assessing Laterality Errors in Radiology: Comparing Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing

PURPOSE

We compared the performance of generative artificial intelligence (AI) (Augmented Transformer Assisted Radiology Intelligence [ATARI, Microsoft Nuance, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington]) and natural language processing (NLP) tools for identifying laterality errors in radiology reports and images.

METHODS

We used an NLP-based (mPower, Microsoft Nuance) tool to identify radiology reports flagged for laterality errors in its Quality Assurance Dashboard. The NLP model detects and highlights laterality mismatches in radiology reports. From an initial pool of 1,124 radiology reports flagged by the NLP for laterality errors, we selected and evaluated 898 reports that encompassed radiography, CT, MRI, and ultrasound modalities to ensure comprehensive coverage. A radiologist reviewed each radiology report to assess if the flagged laterality errors were present (reporting error-true-positive) or absent (NLP error-false-positive). Next, we applied ATARI to 237 radiology reports and images with consecutive NLP true-positive (118 reports) and false-positive (119 reports) laterality errors. We estimated accuracy of NLP and generative AI tools to identify overall and modality-wise laterality errors.

RESULTS

Among the 898 NLP-flagged laterality errors, 64% (574 of 898) had NLP errors and 36% (324 of 898) were reporting errors. The text query ATARI feature correctly identified the absence of laterality mismatch (NLP false-positives) with a 97.4% accuracy (115 of 118 reports; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 96.5%-98.3%). Combined vision and text query resulted in 98.3% accuracy (116 of 118 reports or images; 95% CI = 97.6%-99.0%), and query alone had a 98.3% accuracy (116 of 118 images; 95% CI = 97.6%-99.0%).

CONCLUSION

The generative AI-empowered ATARI prototype outperformed the assessed NLP tool for determining true and false laterality errors in radiology reports while enabling an image-based laterality determination. Underlying errors in ATARI text query in complex radiology reports emphasize the need for further improvement in the technology.

Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging

Medical imaging instrumentation design and construction is based on radiation sources and radiation detectors/sensors. This review focuses on the detectors and sensors of medical imaging systems. These systems are subdivided into various categories depending on their structure, the type of radiation they capture, how the radiation is measured, how the images are formed, and the medical goals they serve. Related to medical goals, detectors fall into two major areas: (i) anatomical imaging, which mainly concerns the techniques of diagnostic radiology, and (ii) functional-molecular imaging, which mainly concerns nuclear medicine. An important parameter in the evaluation of the detectors is the combination of the quality of the diagnostic result they offer and the burden of the patient with radiation dose. The latter has to be minimized; thus, the input signal (radiation photon flux) must be kept at low levels. For this reason, the detective quantum efficiency (DQE), expressing signal-to-noise ratio transfer through an imaging system, is of primary importance. In diagnostic radiology, image quality is better than in nuclear medicine; however, in most cases, the dose is higher. On the other hand, nuclear medicine focuses on the detection of functional findings and not on the accurate spatial determination of anatomical data. Detectors are integrated into projection or tomographic imaging systems and are based on the use of scintillators with optical sensors, photoconductors, or semiconductors. Analysis and modeling of such systems can be performed employing theoretical models developed in the framework of cascaded linear systems analysis (LCSA), as well as within the signal detection theory (SDT) and information theory.

Assessing the Emergence and Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Research in Neuroradiology

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has been growing in neuroradiology, but there is limited knowledge on how this interest has manifested into research and specifically, its qualities and characteristics. This study aims to characterize the emergence and evolution of AI/ML articles within neuroradiology and provide a comprehensive overview of the trends, challenges, and future directions of the field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a bibliometric analysis of the American Journal of Neuroradiology; the journal was queried for original research articles published since inception (January 1, 1980) to December 3, 2022 that contained any of the following key terms: "machine learning," "artificial intelligence," "radiomics," "deep learning," "neural network," "generative adversarial network," "object detection," or "natural language processing." Articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers, and categorized into statistical modeling (type 1), AI/ML development (type 2), both representing developmental research work but without a direct clinical integration, or end-user application (type 3), which is the closest surrogate of potential AI/ML integration into day-to-day practice. To better understand the limiting factors to type 3 articles being published, we analyzed type 2 articles as they should represent the precursor work leading to type 3.

RESULTS

A total of 182 articles were identified with 79% being nonintegration focused (type 1 n = 53, type 2 n = 90) and 21% (n = 39) being type 3. The total number of articles published grew roughly 5-fold in the last 5 years, with the nonintegration focused articles mainly driving this growth. Additionally, a minority of type 2 articles addressed bias (22%) and explainability (16%). These articles were primarily led by radiologists (63%), with most (60%) having additional postgraduate degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

AI/ML publications have been rapidly increasing in neuroradiology with only a minority of this growth being attributable to end-user application. Areas identified for improvement include enhancing the quality of type 2 articles, namely external validation, and addressing both bias and explainability. These results ultimately provide authors, editors, clinicians, and policymakers important insights to promote a shift toward integrating practical AI/ML solutions in neuroradiology.

Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for prevention, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Despite the potential for AI to improve care, ethical concerns and mistrust in AI-enabled healthcare exist among the public and medical community. Given the rapid and transformative recent growth of AI in cardiovascular care, to inform practice guidelines and regulatory policies that facilitate ethical and trustworthy use of AI in medicine, we conducted a literature review to identify key ethical and trust barriers and facilitators from patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives when using AI in cardiovascular care.

METHODS

In this rapid literature review, we searched six bibliographic databases to identify publications discussing transparency, trust, or ethical concerns (outcomes of interest) associated with AI-based medical devices (interventions of interest) in the context of cardiovascular care from patients', caregivers', or healthcare providers' perspectives. The search was completed on May 24, 2022 and was not limited by date or study design.

RESULTS

After reviewing 7,925 papers from six databases and 3,603 papers identified through citation chasing, 145 articles were included. Key ethical concerns included privacy, security, or confidentiality issues (n = 59, 40.7%); risk of healthcare inequity or disparity (n = 36, 24.8%); risk of patient harm (n = 24, 16.6%); accountability and responsibility concerns (n = 19, 13.1%); problematic informed consent and potential loss of patient autonomy (n = 17, 11.7%); and issues related to data ownership (n = 11, 7.6%). Major trust barriers included data privacy and security concerns, potential risk of patient harm, perceived lack of transparency about AI-enabled medical devices, concerns about AI replacing human aspects of care, concerns about prioritizing profits over patients' interests, and lack of robust evidence related to the accuracy and limitations of AI-based medical devices. Ethical and trust facilitators included ensuring data privacy and data validation, conducting clinical trials in diverse cohorts, providing appropriate training and resources to patients and healthcare providers and improving their engagement in different phases of AI implementation, and establishing further regulatory oversights.

CONCLUSION

This review revealed key ethical concerns and barriers and facilitators of trust in AI-enabled medical devices from patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives. Successful integration of AI into cardiovascular care necessitates implementation of mitigation strategies. These strategies should focus on enhanced regulatory oversight on the use of patient data and promoting transparency around the use of AI in patient care.

Artificial intelligence for ultrasonographic detection and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

The effectiveness of ultrasonography (USG) in liver cancer screening is partly constrained by the operator's expertise. We aimed to develop and evaluate an AI-assisted system for detecting and classifying focal liver lesions (FLLs) from USG images. This retrospective study incorporated 26,288 USG images from 5444 patients to train YOLOv5 model for FLLs detection and classification of seven different types of FLLs, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), focal fatty infiltration, focal fatty sparing (FFS), cyst, hemangioma, and regenerative nodules. AI model performance was assessed for detection and diagnosis of the FLLs on a per-image and per-lesion basis. The AI achieved an overall FLLs detection rate of 84.8% (95%CI:83.3-86.4), with consistent performance for FLLs ≤ 1 cm and > 1 cm. It also exhibited sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing malignant FLLs from other benign FLLs at 97.0% (95%CI:95. 9-98.2) and 97.0% (95%CI:95.9-98.1), respectively. Among specific FLL types, CCA detection rate was at 92.2% (95%CI:88.0-96.4), followed by FFS at 89.7% (95%CI:87.1-92.3), and HCC at 82.3% (95%CI:77.1-87.5). The specificities and NPVs for regenerative nodules were 100% and 99.9% (95%CI:99.8-100.0), respectively. Our AI model can potentially assist physicians in FLLs detection and diagnosis during USG examinations. Further external validation is needed for clinical application.

Advancements in AI based healthcare techniques with FOCUS ON diagnostic techniques

Since the past decade, the interest towards more precise and efficient healthcare techniques with special emphasis on diagnostic techniques has increased. Artificial Intelligence has proved to be instrumental in development of various such techniques. The various types of AI like ML, NLP, RPA etc. are being used, which have streamlined and organised the Electronic Health Records (EHR) along with aiding the healthcare provider with decision making and sample and data analysis. This article also deals with the 3 major categories of diagnostic techniques - Imaging based, Pathology based and Preventive diagnostic techniques and what all changes and modifications were brought upon them, due to use of AI. Due to such a high demand, the investment in AI based healthcare techniques has increased substantially, with predicted market size of almost 188 billon USD by 2030. In India itself, AI in healthcare is expected to raise the GDP by 25 billion USD by 2028. But there are also several challenges associated with this like unavailability of quality data, black box issue etc. One of the major challenges is the ethical considerations and issues during use of medical records as it is a very sensitive document. Due to this, there is several trust issues associated with adoption of AI by many organizations. These challenges have also been discussed in this article. Need for further development in the AI based diagnostic techniques is also done in the article. Alongside, the production of such techniques and devices which are easy to use and simple to incorporate into the daily workflows have immense scope in the upcoming times. The increasing scope of Clinical Decision Support System, Telemedicine etc. make AI a promising field in the healthcare and diagnostics arena. Concluding the article, it can be said that despite the presence of various challenges to the implementation and usage, the future prospects for AI in healthcare is immense and work needs to be done in order to ensure the availability of resources for same so that high level of accuracy can be achieved and better health outcomes can be provided to patients. Ethical concerns need to be addressed for smooth implementation and to reduce the burden of the developers, which has been discussed in this narrative review article.

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Neurocritical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury : Past, Present and Future

In neurointensive care units (NICUs), particularly in cases involving traumatic brain injury (TBI), swift and accurate decision-making is critical because of rapidly changing patient conditions and the risk of secondary brain injury. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in NICU can enhance clinical decision support and provide valuable assistance in these complex scenarios. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current status and future prospects of AI utilization in the NICU, along with the challenges that must be overcome to realize this. Presently, the primary application of AI in NICU is outcome prediction through the analysis of preadmission and high-resolution data during admission. Recent applications include augmented neuromonitoring via signal quality control and real-time event prediction. In addition, AI can integrate data gathered from various measures and support minimally invasive neuromonitoring to increase patient safety. However, despite the recent surge in AI adoption within the NICU, the majority of AI applications have been limited to simple classification tasks, thus leaving the true potential of AI largely untapped. Emerging AI technologies, such as generalist medical AI and digital twins, harbor immense potential for enhancing advanced neurocritical care through broader AI applications. If challenges such as acquiring high-quality data and ethical issues are overcome, these new AI technologies can be clinically utilized in the actual NICU environment. Emphasizing the need for continuous research and development to maximize the potential of AI in the NICU, we anticipate that this will further enhance the efficiency and accuracy of TBI treatment within the NICU.

Patients' Attitudes Toward the Use of Artificial Intelligence as a Diagnostic Tool in Radiology in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used in various medical fields, including diagnostic radiology as a tool for greater efficiency, precision, and accuracy. The integration of AI as a radiological diagnostic tool has the potential to mitigate delays in diagnosis, which could, in turn, impact patients' prognosis and treatment outcomes. The literature shows conflicting results regarding patients' attitudes to AI as a diagnostic tool. To the best of our knowledge, no similar study has been conducted in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study are to examine patients' attitudes toward the use of AI as a tool in diagnostic radiology at King Khalid University Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Additionally, we sought to explore potential associations between patients' attitudes and various sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected from patients scheduled for radiological imaging through a validated self-administered questionnaire. The main outcome was to measure patients' attitudes to the use of AI in radiology by calculating mean scores of 5 factors, distrust and accountability (factor 1), procedural knowledge (factor 2), personal interaction and communication (factor 3), efficiency (factor 4), and methods of providing information to patients (factor 5). Data were analyzed using the student t test, one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 382 participants (n=273, 71.5% women and n=109, 28.5% men) completed the surveys and were included in the analysis. The mean age of the respondents was 39.51 (SD 13.26) years. Participants favored physicians over AI for procedural knowledge, personal interaction, and being informed. However, the participants demonstrated a neutral attitude for distrust and accountability and for efficiency. Marital status was found to be associated with distrust and accountability, procedural knowledge, and personal interaction. Associations were also found between self-reported health status and being informed and between the field of specialization and distrust and accountability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were keen to understand the work of AI in radiology but favored personal interaction with a radiologist. Patients were impartial toward AI replacing radiologists and the efficiency of AI, which should be a consideration in future policy development and integration. Future research involving multicenter studies in different regions of Saudi Arabia is required.

Advancements of non‐invasive imaging technologies for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis: Present and future

Liver fibrosis is a reparative response triggered by liver injury. Non‐invasive assessment and staging of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease are of paramount importance, as treatment strategies and prognoses depend significantly on the degree of fibrosis. Although liver fibrosis has traditionally been staged through invasive liver biopsy, this method is prone to sampling errors, particularly when biopsy sizes are inadequate. Consequently, there is an urgent clinical need for an alternative to biopsy, one that ensures precise, sensitive, and non‐invasive diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. Non‐invasive imaging assessments have assumed a pivotal role in clinical practice, enjoying growing popularity and acceptance due to their potential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring liver fibrosis. In this comprehensive review, we first delved into the current landscape of non‐invasive imaging technologies, assessing their accuracy and the transformative impact they have had on the diagnosis and management of liver fibrosis in both clinical practice and animal models. Additionally, we provided an in‐depth exploration of recent advancements in ultrasound imaging, computed tomography imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence within the field of liver fibrosis research. We summarized the key concepts, advantages, limitations, and diagnostic performance of each technique. Finally, we discussed the challenges associated with clinical implementation and offer our perspective on advancing the field, hoping to provide alternative directions for the future research.

Radiologists' perceptions on AI integration: An in-depth survey study

PURPOSE

To assess the perceptions and attitudes of radiologists toward the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among members of the SIRM Lombardy. Radiologists' attitudes were assessed comprehensively, covering satisfaction with AI-based tools, propensity for innovation, and optimism for the future. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: the first gathered demographic and professional information using categorical responses, while the second evaluated radiologists' attitudes toward AI through Likert-type responses ranging from 1 to 5 (with 1 representing extremely negative attitudes, 3 indicating a neutral stance, and 5 reflecting extremely positive attitudes). Questionnaire refinement involved an iterative process with expert panels and a pilot phase to enhance consistency and eliminate redundancy. Exploratory data analysis employed descriptive statistics and visual assessment of Likert plots, supported by non-parametric tests for subgroup comparisons for a thorough analysis of specific emerging patterns.

RESULTS

The survey yielded 232 valid responses. The findings reveal a generally optimistic outlook on AI adoption, especially among young radiologist (<30) and seasoned professionals (>60, p<0.01). However, while 36.2 % (84 out 232) of subjects reported daily use of AI-based tools, only a third considered their contribution decisive (30 %, 25 out of 84). AI literacy varied, with a notable proportion feeling inadequately informed (36 %, 84 out of 232), particularly among younger radiologists (46 %, p < 0.01). Positive attitudes towards the potential of AI to improve detection, characterization of anomalies and reduce workload (positive answers > 80 %) and were consistent across subgroups. Radiologists' opinions were more skeptical about the role of AI in enhancing decision-making processes, including the choice of further investigation, and in personalized medicine in general. Overall, respondents recognized AI's significant impact on the radiology profession, viewing it as an opportunity (61 %, 141 out of 232) rather than a threat (18 %, 42 out of 232), with a majority expressing belief in AI's relevance to future radiologists' career choices (60 %, 139 out of 232). However, there were some concerns, particularly among breast radiologists (20 of 232 responders), regarding the potential impact of AI on the profession. Eighty-four percent of the respondents consider the final assessment by the radiologist still to be essential.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate an overall positive attitude towards the adoption of AI in radiology, though this is moderated by concerns regarding training and practical efficacy. Addressing AI literacy gaps, especially among younger radiologists, is essential. Furthermore, proactively adapting to technological advancements is crucial to fully leverage AI's potential benefits. Despite the generally positive outlook among radiologists, there remains significant work to be done to enhance the integration and widespread use of AI tools in clinical practice.

An Introductory Guide to Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology: Part 2: Implementation Considerations and Harms

The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in interventional radiology (IR) will bring about new challenges and opportunities for patients and clinicians. AI may comprise software as a medical device or AI-integrated hardware and will require a rigorous evaluation that should be guided based on the level of risk of the implementation. A hierarchy of risk of harm and possible harms are described herein. A checklist to guide deployment of an AI in a clinical IR environment is provided. As AI continues to evolve, regulation and evaluation of the AI medical devices will need to continue to evolve to keep pace and ensure patient safety.

The Picasso's skepticism on computer science and the dawn of generative AI: questions after the answers to keep "machines-in-the-loop"

Starting from Picasso's quote ("Computers are useless. They can only give you answers"), we discuss the introduction of generative artificial intelligence (AI), including generative adversarial networks (GANs) and transformer-based architectures such as large language models (LLMs) in radiology, where their potential in reporting, image synthesis, and analysis is notable. However, the need for improvements, evaluations, and regulations prior to clinical use is also clear. Integration of LLMs into clinical workflow needs cautiousness, to avoid or at least mitigate risks associated with false diagnostic suggestions. We highlight challenges in synthetic image generation, inherent biases in AI models, and privacy concerns, stressing the importance of diverse training datasets and robust data privacy measures. We examine the regulatory landscape, including the 2023 Executive Order on AI in the United States and the 2024 AI Act in the European Union, which set standards for AI applications in healthcare. This manuscript contributes to the field by emphasizing the necessity of maintaining the human element in medical procedures while leveraging generative AI, advocating for a "machines-in-the-loop" approach.

Errors in Radiology: A Standard Review

Radiological interpretations, while essential, are not infallible and are best understood as expert opinions formed through the evaluation of available evidence. Acknowledging the inherent possibility of error is crucial, as it frames the discussion on improving diagnostic accuracy and patient care. A comprehensive review of error classifications highlights the complexity of diagnostic errors, drawing on recent frameworks to categorize them into perceptual and cognitive errors, among others. This classification underpins an analysis of specific error types, their prevalence, and implications for clinical practice. Additionally, we address the psychological impact of radiological practice, including the effects of mental health and burnout on diagnostic accuracy. The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in mitigating errors is discussed, alongside ethical and regulatory considerations in its application. This research contributes to the body of knowledge on radiological errors, offering insights into preventive strategies and the integration of AI to enhance diagnostic practices. It underscores the importance of a nuanced understanding of errors in radiology, aiming to foster improvements in patient care and radiological accuracy.

Gamified Crowdsourcing as a Novel Approach to Lung Ultrasound Data Set Labeling: Prospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) models can yield faster and more accurate medical diagnoses; however, developing ML models is limited by a lack of high-quality labeled training data. Crowdsourced labeling is a potential solution but can be constrained by concerns about label quality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine whether a gamified crowdsourcing platform with continuous performance assessment, user feedback, and performance-based incentives could produce expert-quality labels on medical imaging data.

METHODS

In this diagnostic comparison study, 2384 lung ultrasound clips were retrospectively collected from 203 emergency department patients. A total of 6 lung ultrasound experts classified 393 of these clips as having no B-lines, one or more discrete B-lines, or confluent B-lines to create 2 sets of reference standard data sets (195 training clips and 198 test clips). Sets were respectively used to (1) train users on a gamified crowdsourcing platform and (2) compare the concordance of the resulting crowd labels to the concordance of individual experts to reference standards. Crowd opinions were sourced from DiagnosUs (Centaur Labs) iOS app users over 8 days, filtered based on past performance, aggregated using majority rule, and analyzed for label concordance compared with a hold-out test set of expert-labeled clips. The primary outcome was comparing the labeling concordance of collated crowd opinions to trained experts in classifying B-lines on lung ultrasound clips.

RESULTS

Our clinical data set included patients with a mean age of 60.0 (SD 19.0) years; 105 (51.7%) patients were female and 114 (56.1%) patients were White. Over the 195 training clips, the expert-consensus label distribution was 114 (58%) no B-lines, 56 (29%) discrete B-lines, and 25 (13%) confluent B-lines. Over the 198 test clips, expert-consensus label distribution was 138 (70%) no B-lines, 36 (18%) discrete B-lines, and 24 (12%) confluent B-lines. In total, 99,238 opinions were collected from 426 unique users. On a test set of 198 clips, the mean labeling concordance of individual experts relative to the reference standard was 85.0% (SE 2.0), compared with 87.9% crowdsourced label concordance (P=.15). When individual experts' opinions were compared with reference standard labels created by majority vote excluding their own opinion, crowd concordance was higher than the mean concordance of individual experts to reference standards (87.4% vs 80.8%, SE 1.6 for expert concordance; P<.001). Clips with discrete B-lines had the most disagreement from both the crowd consensus and individual experts with the expert consensus. Using randomly sampled subsets of crowd opinions, 7 quality-filtered opinions were sufficient to achieve near the maximum crowd concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

Crowdsourced labels for B-line classification on lung ultrasound clips via a gamified approach achieved expert-level accuracy. This suggests a strategic role for gamified crowdsourcing in efficiently generating labeled image data sets for training ML systems.

Technological Advances in SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging

Single photon emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) is a mature imaging technology with a dynamic role in the diagnosis and monitoring of a wide array of diseases. This paper reviews the technological advances, clinical impact, and future directions of SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging. The focus of this review is on signal amplifier devices, detector materials, camera head and collimator designs, image reconstruction techniques, and quantitative methods. Bulky photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) are being replaced by position-sensitive PMTs (PSPMTs), avalanche photodiodes (APDs), and silicon PMs to achieve higher detection efficiency and improved energy resolution and spatial resolution. Most recently, new SPECT cameras have been designed for cardiac imaging. The new design involves using specialised collimators in conjunction with conventional sodium iodide detectors (NaI(Tl)) or an L-shaped camera head, which utilises semiconductor detector materials such as CdZnTe (CZT: cadmium-zinc-telluride). The clinical benefits of the new design include shorter scanning times, improved image quality, enhanced patient comfort, reduced claustrophobic effects, and decreased overall size, particularly in specialised clinical centres. These noticeable improvements are also attributed to the implementation of resolution-recovery iterative reconstructions. Immense efforts have been made to establish SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging as quantitative tools by incorporating camera-specific modelling. Moreover, this review includes clinical examples in oncology, neurology, cardiology, musculoskeletal, and infection, demonstrating the impact of these advancements on clinical practice in radiology and molecular imaging departments.

AATCT-IDS: A benchmark Abdominal Adipose Tissue CT Image Dataset for image denoising, semantic segmentation, and radiomics evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The metabolic syndrome induced by obesity is closely associated with cardiovascular disease, and the prevalence is increasing globally, year by year. Obesity is a risk marker for detecting this disease. However, current research on computer-aided detection of adipose distribution is hampered by the lack of open-source large abdominal adipose datasets.

METHODS

In this study, a benchmark Abdominal Adipose Tissue CT Image Dataset (AATCT-IDS) containing 300 subjects is prepared and published. AATCT-IDS publics 13,732 raw CT slices, and the researchers individually annotate the subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue regions of 3213 of those slices that have the same slice distance to validate denoising methods, train semantic segmentation models, and study radiomics. For different tasks, this paper compares and analyzes the performance of various methods on AATCT-IDS by combining the visualization results and evaluation data. Thus, verify the research potential of this data set in the above three types of tasks.

RESULTS

In the comparative study of image denoising, algorithms using a smoothing strategy suppress mixed noise at the expense of image details and obtain better evaluation data. Methods such as BM3D preserve the original image structure better, although the evaluation data are slightly lower. The results show significant differences among them. In the comparative study of semantic segmentation of abdominal adipose tissue, the segmentation results of adipose tissue by each model show different structural characteristics. Among them, BiSeNet obtains segmentation results only slightly inferior to U-Net with the shortest training time and effectively separates small and isolated adipose tissue. In addition, the radiomics study based on AATCT-IDS reveals three adipose distributions in the subject population.

CONCLUSION

AATCT-IDS contains the ground truth of adipose tissue regions in abdominal CT slices. This open-source dataset can attract researchers to explore the multi-dimensional characteristics of abdominal adipose tissue and thus help physicians and patients in clinical practice. AATCT-IDS is freely published for non-commercial purpose at: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/AATTCT-IDS/23807256.

Academic radiology department subspeciality organization & fellowship offerings: A hodgepodge

INTRODUCTION

As opportunities for radiologists to subspecialize have increased, many avenues to organize Radiology department subspecialties exist. This study seeks to determine how academic U.S. Radiology departments structure themselves with respect to subspecialty divisions/sections, as there are no current standards for how Radiology departments are subdivided. Additionally, the extent of Radiology fellowships offered are assessed. The websites of academic U.S. Radiology departments, a highly influential source of information, were analyzed to perform this study.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Radiology department websites of all allopathic U.S. medical schools (n = 148) were assessed for the following: presence/absence of Radiology department subdivisions, division/section labels, number of divisions/sections, division/section titles, presence/absence of Radiology fellowships, number of fellowships, and fellowships titles.

RESULTS

114/148 (77 %) medical schools had Radiology department websites. According to their respective websites, 66/114 (58 %) academic Radiology departments had subspecialty divisions/sections, whereas 48/114 (42 %) had no divisions/sections listed. Of the departments that had divisions/sections, the median number of divisions/sections per department was nine, and ranged from two to 14. Fellowships were offered at 82/114 (72 %) academic Radiology departments that had websites, and the median number was six, ranging from one to 13.

CONCLUSION

There is marked heterogeneity of departmental organization across Radiology departments nationwide, likely due to the lack of current standards for how Radiology departments are subdivided into divisions/sections. Of the 77 % of medical schools that have Radiology department websites, only 58 % of departments listed divisions/sections, and 72 % posted fellowship offerings.

Knowledge, attitude, and perception of Arab medical students towards artificial intelligence in medicine and radiology: A multi-national cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess undergraduate medical students' knowledge, attitude, and perception regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine.

METHODS

A multi-national, multi-center cross-sectional study was conducted from March to April 2022, targeting undergraduate medical students in nine Arab countries. The study utilized a web-based questionnaire, with data collection carried out with the help of national leaders and local collaborators. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of knowledge, attitude, and perception among the participants. Additionally, cluster analysis was employed to identify shared patterns within their responses.

RESULTS

Of the 4492 students surveyed, 92.4% had not received formal AI training. Regarding AI and deep learning (DL), 87.1% exhibited a low level of knowledge. Most students (84.9%) believed AI would revolutionize medicine and radiology, with 48.9% agreeing that it could reduce the need for radiologists. Students with high/moderate AI knowledge and training had higher odds of agreeing to endorse AI replacing radiologists, reducing their numbers, and being less likely to consider radiology as a career compared to those with low knowledge/no AI training. Additionally, the majority agreed that AI would aid in the automated detection and diagnosis of pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Arab medical students exhibit a notable deficit in their knowledge and training pertaining to AI. Despite this, they hold a positive perception of AI implementation in medicine and radiology, demonstrating a clear understanding of its significance for the healthcare system and medical curriculum.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study highlights the need for widespread education and training in artificial intelligence for Arab medical students, indicating its significance for healthcare systems and medical curricula.

KEY POINTS

• Arab medical students demonstrate a significant knowledge and training gap when it comes to using AI in the fields of medicine and radiology. • Arab medical students recognize the importance of integrating AI into the medical curriculum. Students with a deeper understanding of AI were more likely to agree that all medical students should receive AI education. However, those with previous AI training were less supportive of this idea. • Students with moderate/high AI knowledge and training displayed increased odds of agreeing that AI has the potential to replace radiologists, reduce the demand for their services, and were less inclined to pursue a career in radiology, when compared to students with low knowledge/no AI training.

[Diagnosis of Rib Fracture Using Artificial Intelligence on Chest CT Images of Patients with Chest Trauma]

Purpose

To determine the pros and cons of an artificial intelligence (AI) model developed to diagnose acute rib fractures in chest CT images of patients with chest trauma.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1209 chest CT images (acute rib fracture [n = 1159], normal [n = 50]) were selected among patients with chest trauma. Among 1159 acute rib fracture CT images, 9 were randomly selected for AI model training. 150 acute rib fracture CT images and 50 normal ones were tested, and the remaining 1000 acute rib fracture CT images was internally verified. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy and errors of AI model for the presence and location of acute rib fractures.

Results

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for diagnosing acute rib fractures in chest CT images were 93.3%, 94%, 97.9%, 82.5%, and 95.6% respectively. However, the accuracy of the location of acute rib fractures was low at 76% (760/1000). The cause of error in the diagnosis of acute rib fracture seemed to be a result of considering the scapula or clavicle that were in the same position (66%) or some ribs that were not recognized (34%).

Conclusion

The AI model for diagnosing acute rib fractures showed high accuracy in detecting the presence of acute rib fractures, but diagnosis of the exact location of rib fractures was limited.

Oral Health Status and Treatment Needs Based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dental Panoramic Radiograph (DPR) Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining popularity in modern dentistry. AI has been successfully used to interpret dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) and quickly screen large groups of patients. This cross-sectional study aimed to perform a population-based assessment of the oral health status and treatment needs of the residents of Kielce, Poland, and the surrounding area based on DPR analysis performed by a high-accuracy AI algorithm trained with over 250,000 radiographs. Methods: This study included adults who had a panoramic radiograph performed, regardless of indications. The following diagnoses were used for analysis: (1) dental caries, (2) missing tooth, (3) dental filling, (4) root canal filling, (5) endodontic lesion, (6) implant, (7) implant abutment crown, (8) pontic crown, (9) dental abutment crown, and (10) sound tooth. The study sample included 980 subjects. Results: The patients had an average of 15 sound teeth, with the domination of the lower dental arch over the upper one. The most commonly identified pathology was dental caries, which affected 99% of participants. A total of 67% of patients underwent root canal treatment. Every fifth endodontically treated tooth presented a periapical lesion. Of study group members, 82% lost at least one tooth. Pontics were identified more often (9%) than implants (2%) in replacing missing teeth. Conclusions: DPR assessment by AI has proven to be an efficient method for population analysis. Despite recent improvements in the oral health status of Polish residents, its level is still unsatisfactory and suggests the need to improve oral health. However, due to some limitations of this study, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Familiarity, confidence and preference of artificial intelligence feedback and prompts by Australian breast cancer screening readers

Objectives This study explored the familiarity, perceptions and confidence of Australian radiology clinicians involved in reading screening mammograms, regarding artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast cancer detection. Methods Sixty-five radiologists, breast physicians and radiology trainees participated in an online survey that consisted of 23 multiple choice questions asking about their experience and familiarity with AI products. Furthermore, the survey asked about their confidence in using AI outputs and their preference for AI modes applied in a breast screening context. Participants' responses to questions were compared using Pearson's χ 2 test. Bonferroni-adjusted significance tests were used for pairwise comparisons. Results Fifty-five percent of respondents had experience with AI in their workplaces, with automatic density measurement powered by machine learning being the most familiar AI product (69.4%). The top AI outputs with the highest ranks of perceived confidence were 'Displaying suspicious areas on mammograms with the percentage of cancer possibility' (67.8%) and 'Automatic mammogram classification (normal, benign, cancer, uncertain)' (64.6%). Radiology and breast physicians preferred using AI as second-reader mode (75.4% saying 'somewhat happy' to 'extremely happy') over triage (47.7%), pre-screening and first-reader modes (both with 26.2%) (P  < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of screen readers expressed increased confidence in utilising AI for highlighting suspicious areas on mammograms and for automatically classifying mammograms. They considered AI as an optimal second-reader mode being the most ideal use in a screening program. The findings provide valuable insights into the familiarities and expectations of radiologists and breast clinicians for the AI products that can enhance the effectiveness of the breast cancer screening programs, benefitting both healthcare professionals and patients alike.

Black box no more: A cross-sectional multi-disciplinary survey for exploring governance and guiding adoption of AI in medical imaging and radiotherapy in the UK

BACKGROUND

Medical Imaging and radiotherapy (MIRT) are at the forefront of artificial intelligence applications. The exponential increase of these applications has made governance frameworks necessary to uphold safe and effective clinical adoption. There is little information about how healthcare practitioners in MIRT in the UK use AI tools, their governance and associated challenges, opportunities and priorities for the future.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey was open from November to December 2022 to MIRT professionals who had knowledge or made use of AI tools, as an attempt to map out current policy and practice and to identify future needs. The survey was electronically distributed to the participants. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and inferential statistics on the SPSS statistical software. Content analysis was employed for the open-ended questions.

RESULTS

Among the 245 responses, the following were emphasised as central to AI adoption: governance frameworks, practitioner training, leadership, and teamwork within the AI ecosystem. Prior training was strongly correlated with increased knowledge about AI tools and frameworks. However, knowledge of related frameworks remained low, with different professionals showing different affinity to certain frameworks related to their respective roles. Common challenges and opportunities of AI adoption were also highlighted, with recommendations for future practice.

Testing protocols and measurement techniques when using pressure sensors for sport and health applications: A comparative review

Plantar pressure measurement systems are routinely used in sports and health applications to assess locomotion. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically discuss: (a) applications of the pressure measurement systems in sport and healthcare, (b) testing protocols and considerations for clinical gait analysis, (c) clinical recommendations for interpreting plantar pressure data, (d) calibration procedures and their accuracy, and (e) the future of pressure sensor data analysis. Rigid pressure platforms are typically used to measure plantar pressures for the assessment of foot function during standing and walking, particularly when barefoot, and are the most accurate for measuring plantar pressures. For reliable data, two step protocol prior to contacting the pressure plate is recommended. In-shoe systems are most suitable for measuring plantar pressures in the field during daily living or dynamic sporting movements as they are often wireless and can measure multiple steps. They are the most suitable equipment to assess the effects of footwear and orthotics on plantar pressures. However, they typically have lower spatial resolution and sampling frequency than platform systems. Users of pressure measurement systems need to consider the suitability of the calibration procedures for their chosen application when selecting and using a pressure measurement system. For some applications, a bespoke calibration procedure is required to improve validity and reliability of the pressure measurement system. The testing machines that are commonly used for dynamic calibration of pressure measurement systems frequently have loading rates of less than even those found in walking, so the development of testing protocols that truly measure the loading rates found in many sporting movements are required. There is clear potential for AI techniques to assist in the analysis and interpretation of plantar pressure data to enable the more complete use of pressure system data in clinical diagnoses and monitoring.

Evaluation of deep learning-based reconstruction late gadolinium enhancement images for identifying patients with clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The presence of infarction in patients with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) is a critical feature in predicting adverse cardiac events. This study aimed to compare the detection rate of UMI using conventional and deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-based late gadolinium enhancement (LGEO and LGEDL, respectively) and evaluate optimal quantification parameters to enhance diagnosis and management of suspected patients with UMI.

METHODS

This prospective study included 98 patients (68 men; mean age: 55.8 ± 8.1 years) with suspected UMI treated at our hospital from April 2022 to August 2023. LGEO and LGEDL images were obtained using conventional and commercially available inline DLR algorithms. The myocardial signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and percentage of enhanced area (Parea) employing the signal threshold versus reference mean (STRM) approach, which correlates the signal intensity (SI) within areas of interest with the average SI of normal regions, were analyzed. Analysis was performed using the standard deviation (SD) threshold approach (2SD-5SD) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) method. The diagnostic efficacies based on LGEDL and LGEO images were calculated.

RESULTS

The SNRDL and CNRDL were two times better than the SNRO and CNRO, respectively (P < 0.05). Parea-DL was elevated compared to Parea-O using the threshold methods (P < 0.05); however, no intergroup difference was found based on the FWHM method (P > 0.05). The Parea-DL and Parea-O also differed except between the 2SD and 3SD and the 4SD/5SD and FWHM methods (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that each SD method exhibited good diagnostic efficacy for detecting UMI, with the Parea-DL having the best diagnostic efficacy based on the 5SD method (P < 0.05). Overall, the LGEDL images had better image quality. Strong diagnostic efficacy for UMI identification was achieved when the STRM was ≥ 4SD and ≥ 3SD for the LGEDL and LGEO, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

STRM selection for LGEDL magnetic resonance images helps improve clinical decision-making in patients with UMI. This study underscored the importance of STRM selection for analyzing LGEDL images to enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making for patients with UMI, further providing better cardiovascular care.

A Theoretical Exploration of Artificial Intelligence's Impact on Feto-Maternal Health from Conception to Delivery

The implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is enhancing diagnostic accuracy in clinical setups. The use of AI in healthcare is steadily increasing with advancing technology, extending beyond disease diagnosis to encompass roles in feto-maternal health. AI harnesses Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and computer vision to analyze data and draw conclusions. Considering maternal health, ML analyzes vast datasets to predict maternal and fetal health outcomes, while NLP interprets medical texts and patient records to assist in diagnosis and treatment decisions. ANN models identify patterns in complex feto-maternal medical data, aiding in risk assessment and intervention planning whereas, computer vision enables the analysis of medical images for early detection of feto-maternal complications. AI facilitates early pregnancy detection, genetic screening, and continuous monitoring of maternal health parameters, providing real-time alerts for deviations, while also playing a crucial role in the early detection of fetal abnormalities through enhanced ultrasound imaging, contributing to informed decision-making. This review investigates into the application of AI, particularly through predictive models, in addressing the monitoring of feto-maternal health. Additionally, it examines potential future directions and challenges associated with these applications.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithms in Automated Detection of Neck of Femur Fracture on a Plain Radiograph: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in identifying neck of femur fracture on a plain radiograph.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

PubMed, Web of science, Scopus, IEEE, and the Science direct databases were searched from inception to 30 July 2023.

Eligibility criteria for study selection

Eligible article types were descriptive, analytical, or trial studies published in the English language providing data on the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) based algorithms in the detection of the neck of the femur (NOF) fracture on plain X-ray.

Main outcome measures

The prespecified primary outcome was to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden index, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Two teams of reviewers (each consisting of two members) extracted the data from available information in each study. The risk of bias was assessed using a mix of the CLAIM (the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging) and QUADAS-2 (A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria.

Results

Of the 437 articles retrieved, five were eligible for inclusion, and the pooled sensitivity of AIs in diagnosing the fracture NOF was 85%, with a specificity of 87%. For all studies, the pooled Youden index (YI) was 0.73. The average positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 19.88, whereas the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.17. The random effects model showed an overall odds of 1.16 (0.84-1.61) in the forest plot, comparing the AI system with those of human diagnosis. The overall heterogeneity of the studies was marginal (I2 = 51%). The CLAIM criteria for risk of bias assessment had an overall >70% score.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms can be used as a diagnostic adjunct, benefiting clinicians by taking less time and effort in neck of the femur (NOF) fracture diagnosis.

Study registration

PROSPERO CRD42022375449.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01130-6.

The diagnostic, therapeutic, and ethical impact of artificial intelligence in modern medicine

In the evolution of modern medicine, artificial intelligence (AI) has been proven to provide an integral aspect of revolutionizing clinical diagnosis, drug discovery, and patient care. With the potential to scrutinize colossal amounts of medical data, radiological and histological images, and genomic data in healthcare institutions, AI-powered systems can recognize, determine, and associate patterns and provide impactful insights that would be strenuous and challenging for clinicians to detect during their daily clinical practice. The outcome of AI-mediated search offers more accurate, personalized patient diagnoses, guides in research for new drug therapies, and provides a more effective multidisciplinary treatment plan that can be implemented for patients with chronic diseases. Among the many promising applications of AI in modern medicine, medical imaging stands out distinctly as an area with tremendous potential. AI-powered algorithms can now accurately and sensitively identify cancer cells and other lesions in medical images with greater accuracy and sensitivity. This allows for earlier diagnosis and treatment, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive insight into diagnostic, therapeutic, and ethical issues with the advent of AI in modern medicine.

From explanation to intervention: Interactive knowledge extraction from Convolutional Neural Networks used in radiology

Deep Learning models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are very effective at extracting complex image features from medical X-rays. However, the limited interpretability of CNNs has hampered their deployment in medical settings as they failed to gain trust among clinicians. In this work, we propose an interactive framework to allow clinicians to ask what-if questions and intervene in the decisions of a CNN, with the aim of increasing trust in the system. The framework translates a layer of a trained CNN into a measurable and compact set of symbolic rules. Expert interactions with visualizations of the rules promote the use of clinically-relevant CNN kernels and attach meaning to the rules. The definition and relevance of the kernels are supported by radiomics analyses and permutation evaluations, respectively. CNN kernels that do not have a clinically-meaningful interpretation are removed without affecting model performance. By allowing clinicians to evaluate the impact of adding or removing kernels from the rule set, our approach produces an interpretable refinement of the data-driven CNN in alignment with medical best practice.

Capturing artificial intelligence applications' value proposition in healthcare - a qualitative research study

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications pave the way for innovations in the healthcare (HC) industry. However, their adoption in HC organizations is still nascent as organizations often face a fragmented and incomplete picture of how they can capture the value of AI applications on a managerial level. To overcome adoption hurdles, HC organizations would benefit from understanding how they can capture AI applications' potential.We conduct a comprehensive systematic literature review and 11 semi-structured expert interviews to identify, systematize, and describe 15 business objectives that translate into six value propositions of AI applications in HC.Our results demonstrate that AI applications can have several business objectives converging into risk-reduced patient care, advanced patient care, self-management, process acceleration, resource optimization, and knowledge discovery.We contribute to the literature by extending research on value creation mechanisms of AI to the HC context and guiding HC organizations in evaluating their AI applications or those of the competition on a managerial level, to assess AI investment decisions, and to align their AI application portfolio towards an overarching strategy.

A machine learning approach to predicting vascular calcification risk of type 2 diabetes: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Recently, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have experienced a higher incidence and severer degree of vascular calcification (VC), which leads to an increase in the incidence and mortality of vascular complications in patients with T2DM.

HYPOTHESIS

To construct and validate prediction models for the risk of VC in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Twenty-three baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record system. Ten clinical features were screened with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and were used to develop prediction models based on eight machine learning (ML) algorithms (k-nearest neighbor [k-NN], light gradient boosting machine, logistic regression [LR], multilayer perception [(MLP], Naive Bayes [NB], random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], XGBoost [XGB]). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, and precision.

RESULTS

A total of 1407 and 352 patients were retrospectively collected in the training and test sets, respectively. Among the eight models, the AUC value in the NB model was higher than the other models (NB: 0.753, LGB: 0.719, LR: 0.749, MLP: 0.715, RF: 0.722, SVM: 0.689, XGB:0.707, p < .05 for all). The k-NN model achieved the highest sensitivity of 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.633-0.857), the MLP model achieved the highest accuracy of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.767-0.852) and specificity of 0.875 (95% CI: 0.836-0.912).

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed a predictive model of VC based on ML and clinical features in type 2 diabetic patients. The NB model is a tool with potential to facilitate clinicians in identifying VC in high-risk patients.

Robot-assisted surgery and artificial intelligence-based tumour diagnostics: social preferences with a representative cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess social preferences for two different advanced digital health technologies and investigate the contextual dependency of the preferences.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was performed among the general population of Hungary aged 40 years and over. Participants were asked to imagine that they needed a total hip replacement surgery and to indicate whether they would prefer a traditional or a robot-assisted (RA) hip surgery. To better understand preferences for the chosen method, the willingness to pay (WTP) method was used. The same assessment was conducted for preferences between a radiologist's and AI-based image analysis in establishing the radiological diagnosis of a suspected tumour. Respondents' electronic health literacy was assessed with the eHEALS questionnaire. Descriptive methods were used to assess sample characteristics and differences between subgroups. Associations were investigated with correlation analysis and multiple linear regressions.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1400 individuals (53.7% female) with a mean age of 58.3 (SD = 11.1) years filled in the survey. RA hip surgery was chosen by 762 (54.4%) respondents, but only 470 (33.6%) chose AI-based medical image evaluation. Those who opted for the digital technology had significantly higher educational levels and electronic health literacy (eHEALS). The majority of respondents were willing to pay to secure their preferred surgical (surgeon 67.2%, robot-assisted: 68.8%) and image assessment (radiologist: 70.9%; AI: 77.4%) methods, reporting similar average amounts in the first (p = 0.677), and a significantly higher average amount for radiologist vs. AI in the second task (p = 0.001). The regression showed a significant association between WTP and income, and in the hip surgery task, it also revealed an association with the type of intervention chosen.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with higher education levels seem to accept the advanced digital medical technologies more. However, the greater openness for RA surgery than for AI image assessment highlights that social preferences may depend considerably on the medical situation and the type of advanced digital technology. WTP results suggest rather firm preferences in the great majority of the cases. Determinants of preferences and real-world choices of affected patients should be further investigated in future studies.

From microscope to micropixels: A rapid review of artificial intelligence for the peripheral blood film

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its application in classification of blood cells in the peripheral blood film is an evolving field in haematology. We performed a rapid review of the literature on AI and peripheral blood films, evaluating the condition studied, image datasets, machine learning models, training set size, testing set size and accuracy. A total of 283 studies were identified, encompassing 6 broad domains: malaria (n = 95), leukemia (n = 81), leukocytes (n = 72), mixed (n = 25), erythrocytes (n = 15) or Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (n = 1). These publications have demonstrated high self-reported mean accuracy rates across various studies (95.5% for malaria, 96.0% for leukemia, 94.4% for leukocytes, 95.2% for mixed studies and 91.2% for erythrocytes), with an overall mean accuracy of 95.1%. Despite the high accuracy, the challenges toward real world translational usage of these AI trained models include the need for well-validated multicentre data, data standardisation, and studies on less common cell types and non-malarial blood-borne parasites.