Circulating tumor DNA in cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and prognosis

Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers

Liquid biopsy, a noninvasive diagnosis that examines circulating tumor components in body fluids, is increasingly used in cancer management. An overview of relevant literature emphasizes the current state of liquid biopsy applications in cancer care. Biomarkers in liquid biopsy, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNAs (ctRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and other components, offer promising opportunities for early cancer diagnosis, treatment selection, monitoring, and disease assessment. The implementation of liquid biopsy in precision medicine has shown significant potential in various cancer types, including lung cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Advances in genomic and molecular technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) have expanded the utility of liquid biopsy, enabling the detection of somatic variants and actionable genomic alterations in tumors. Liquid biopsy has also demonstrated utility in predicting treatment responses, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD), and assessing tumor heterogeneity. Nevertheless, standardizing liquid biopsy techniques, interpreting results, and integrating them into the clinical routine remain as challenges. Despite these challenges, liquid biopsy has significant clinical implications in cancer management, offering a dynamic and noninvasive approach to understanding tumor biology and guiding personalized treatment strategies.

Decoding the Dynamics of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsies

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a fragment of tumor DNA found in the bloodstream, has emerged as a revolutionary tool in cancer management. This review delves into the biology of ctDNA, examining release mechanisms, including necrosis, apoptosis, and active secretion, all of which offer information about the state and nature of the tumor. Comprehensive DNA profiling has been enabled by methods such as whole genome sequencing and methylation analysis. The low abundance of the ctDNA fraction makes alternative techniques, such as digital PCR and targeted next-generation exome sequencing, more valuable and accurate for mutation profiling and detection. There are numerous clinical applications for ctDNA analysis, including non-invasive liquid biopsies for minimal residual disease monitoring to detect cancer recurrence, personalized medicine by mutation profiling for targeted therapy identification, early cancer detection, and real-time evaluation of therapeutic response. Integrating ctDNA analysis into routine clinical practice creates promising avenues for successful and personalized cancer care, from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up.

CRISPR/Cas13a-based supersensitive circulating tumor DNA assay for detecting EGFR mutations in plasma

Despite recent technological advancements in cell tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation detection, challenges persist in identifying low-frequency mutations due to inadequate sensitivity and coverage of current procedures. Herein, we introduce a super-sensitivity and specificity technique for detecting ctDNA mutations, named HiCASE. The method utilizes PCR-based CRISPR, coupled with the restriction enzyme. In this work, HiCASE focuses on testing a series of EGFR mutations to provide enhanced detection technology for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), enabling a detection sensitivity of 0.01% with 40 ng cell free DNA standard. When applied to a panel of 140 plasma samples from 120 NSCLC patients, HiCASE exhibits 88.1% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity with 40 μL of plasma, higher than ddPCR and Super-ARMS assay. In addition, HiCASE can also clearly distinguish T790M/C797S mutations in different positions at a 1% variant allele frequency, offering valuable guidance for drug utilization. Indeed, the established HiCASE assay shows potential for clinical applications.

Electrochemical biosensors for early diagnosis of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive and life-threatening neurological malignancy of predominant astrocyte origin. This type of neoplasm can develop in either the brain or the spine and is also known as glioblastoma multiforme. Although current diagnostic methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) facilitate tumor location, these approaches are unable to assess disease severity. Furthermore, interpretation of imaging studies requires significant expertise which can have substantial inter-observer variability, thus challenging diagnosis and potentially delaying treatment. In contrast, biosensing systems offer a promising alternative to these traditional approaches. These technologies can continuously monitor specific molecules, providing valuable real-time data on treatment response, and could significantly improve patient outcomes. Among various types of biosensors, electrochemical systems are preferred over other types, as they do not require expensive or complex equipment or procedures and can be made with readily available materials and methods. Moreover, electrochemical biosensors can detect very small amounts of analytes with high accuracy and specificity by using various signal amplification strategies and recognition elements. Considering the advantages of electrochemical biosensors compared to other biosensing methods, we aim to highlight the potential application(s) of these sensors for GBM theranostics. The review's innovative insights are expected to antecede the development of novel biosensors and associated diagnostic platforms, ultimately restructuring GBM detection strategies.

Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) and Its Role in Gynecologic Malignancies

OPINION STATEMENT

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) refers to small fragments of DNA released into the bloodstream by cancer cells. It is obtained through "liquid biopsy;" which most commonly refers to plasma or blood samples, but can be obtained from a number of bodily fluids including ascitic fluid, saliva, and even urine and stool. ctDNA is detected via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The DNA from these samples is analyzed for the detection of point mutations, copy-number alterations, gene fusion, and DNA methylation. These results have the potential for use in cancer diagnosis, determining prognosis, targeting gene-specific therapies, and monitoring for/predicting disease recurrence and response to treatment. ctDNA offers an alternative to tissue biopsy; it is less invasive and can be monitored serially over time without multiple procedures. Moreover it may have the ability to detect disease recurrence or predict behavior in a way that solid tissue biopsies, tumor marker surveillance, and imaging cannot. Recent explosion in interest in ctDNA shows promising developments for widespread adoption of these techniques in cancer care. However, the use of ctDNA in diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic malignancies is currently limited, compared to adoption in other solid-organ tumors such as breast and colorectal cancers. Compared to other cancer types, there appear to be fewer comprehensive studies and clinical validations specifically focusing on the use of ctDNA in gynecologic cancers. More research is needed in this area to advance the potential for use of ctDNA in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers before this can be routinely adopted to improve care for patients with gynecologic malignancies.

liquid biopsy holds a promising approach for the early detection of cancer: Current information and future perspectives

Cancer is becoming a global pandemic, and its occurrence is increasing rapidly, putting a strain on people's families, health systems, and finances, in addition to their physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Many cancer types lack screening programs, and many people at high risk of developing cancer do not follow recommended medical screening regimens because of the nature of currently available screening tests and other compliance issues, despite cancer being the second leading cause of death worldwide. Furthermore, a lot of liquid biopsy methods for early cancer screening are not sensitive enough to catch cancer early. Cancer treatment costs increase with the time it takes to diagnose the disease; therefore, early detection is essential to enhance the quality of life and survival rates. The current status of the liquid biopsy sector is examined in this paper.

Longitudinal Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA to Assess the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Genitourinary Malignancies

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in blood has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker demonstrating improved assessment of treatment response in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Here, we performed a pilot study to support the role of ctDNA for longitudinal treatment response monitoring in patients with advanced genitourinary (GU) malignancies receiving ICIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced GU malignancies were prospectively enrolled. All eligible patients received ICI treatment for at least 12 weeks, followed by serial collection of blood samples every 6-8 weeks and conventional scans approximately every 12 weeks until disease progression. ctDNA analysis was performed using Signatera, a tumor-informed multiplex-polymerase chain reaction next-generation sequencing assay. Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was reported and its association with ctDNA status was evaluated. Concordance rate between ctDNA dynamics and conventional imaging was also assessed.

RESULTS

ctDNA analysis was performed on 98 banked plasma samples from 20 patients (15 renal, four urothelial, and one prostate). The median follow-up from the time of initiation of ICI to progressive disease (PD) or data cutoff was 67.7 weeks (range, 19.6-169.6). The ORR was 70% (14/20). Eight patients ultimately developed PD. The overall concordance between ctDNA dynamics and radiographic response was observed in 83% (15/18) of patients. Among the three patients with discordant results, two developed CNS metastases and one progressed with extracranial systemic disease while ctDNA remained undetectable.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, longitudinal ctDNA analysis for monitoring response to ICI in patients with advanced GU tumors was feasible. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate the utility of ctDNA as an ICI response monitoring tool in patients with advanced GU malignancies.

Changes in circulating tumor DNA and outcomes in solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels is a reliable prognostic tool in several malignancies. Dynamic changes in ctDNA levels in response to treatment may also provide prognostic information. Here, we explore the value of changes in ctDNA levels in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (host: PubMed) for trials of ICIs in advanced solid tumors in which outcomes were reported based on change in ctDNA levels. ctDNA reduction was defined as reported in individual trials. Typically, this was either >50% reduction or a reduction to undetectable levels. We extracted HRs and related 95% CIs and/or p values comparing ctDNA reduction versus no reduction for progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS). Data were then pooled in a meta-analysis. Variation in effect size was examined using subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. ctDNA levels were detectable in all participants in all studies prior to initiation of ICIs. A reduction in ctDNA measured 6-16 weeks after starting treatment was associated with significantly better PFS (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.28; p<0.001). Similarly, OS was superior in patients with reduced ctDNA levels (HR 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.26; p<0.001). The results were consistent across all disease sites, lines of treatment, magnitude of change (to undetectable vs >50% reduction) and whether treatment exposure comprised single or combination ICIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced solid tumors, a reduction in ctDNA levels in response to ICIs is associated with substantial improvements in outcome. ctDNA change is an early response biomarker which may allow for de-escalation of cross-sectional imaging in patients receiving ICIs or support treatment de-escalation strategies.

Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsy and Cancer Management

BACKGROUND

The current methodology used to detect, diagnose, and monitor many types of cancers requires invasive tissue biopsy testing. Recently, liquid biopsy using blood, plasma, urine, saliva, and various other bodily fluids has shown utility to solve many issues associated with tissue biopsy. Blood/plasma has received most of the attention within the liquid biopsy field, however, obtaining blood samples from patients is still somewhat invasive and requires trained professionals. Using urine to detect cell-free DNA cancer biomarkers offers a truly non-invasive sampling method that can be easily and reproducibly conducted by patients.

CONTENT

Novel technologies and approaches have made the detection of small quantities of cell-free tumor DNA of varying lengths possible. Recent studies using urine circulating tumor DNA to detect cancer mutations and other biomarkers have shown sensitivity comparable to blood/plasma cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for many cancer types. Thus, urine cell-free DNA liquid biopsy may replace or provide supplementary information to tissue/blood biopsies. Further investigation with larger patient cohorts and standardization of pre-analytical factors is necessary to determine the utility of urine cell-free DNA liquid biopsy for cancer detection, diagnosis, and monitoring in a clinical setting.

SUMMARY

In this mini-review we discuss the biological aspects of cell-free DNA in urine, numerous studies using urine cell-free DNA to detect urological cancers, and recent studies using urine cell-free DNA to detect and monitor non-urological cancers including lung, breast, colorectal, and other cancers.

Roles of circulating tumor DNA in PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint Inhibitors: Current evidence and future directions

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing holds considerable promise for early diagnosis and detection of surveillance and minimal residual disease. Blood ctDNA monitors specific cancers by detecting the alterations found in cancer cells, such as apoptosis and necrosis. Due to the short half-life, ctDNA reflects the actual burden of other treatments on tumors. In addition, ctDNA might be preferable to monitor tumor development and treatment compared with invasive tissue biopsy. ctDNA-based liquid biopsy brings remarkable strength to targeted therapy and precision medicine. Notably, multiple ctDNA analysis platforms have been broadly applied in clinical immunotherapy. Through targeted sequencing, early variations in ctDNA could predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between ctDNA kinetics and anti-PD1 antibodies. The need for further research and development remains, although this biomarker holds significant prospects for early cancer detection. This review focuses on describing the basis of ctDNA and its current utilities in oncology and immunotherapy, either for clinical management or early detection, highlighting its advantages and inherent limitations.

Copy Number Variation of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detected Using NIPT in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Ovarian Cancer Patients

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used to characterize and monitor cancers. Recently, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a new next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach has been applied for detecting ctDNA. This study aimed to investigate the copy number variations (CNVs) utilizing the non-invasive prenatal testing in plasma ctDNA from ovarian cancer (OC) patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The plasma samples of six patients, including stages II–IV, were collected during the pre- and post-NAC treatment that were divided into NAC-sensitive and NAC-resistant groups during the follow-up time. CNV analysis was performed using the NIPT via two methods “an open-source algorithm WISECONDORX and NextGENe software.” Results of these methods were compared in pre- and post-NAC of OC patients. Finally, bioinformatics tools were used for data mining from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate CNVs in OC patients. WISECONDORX analysis indicated fewer CNV changes on chromosomes before treatment in the NAC-sensitive rather than NAC-resistant patients. NextGENe data indicated that CNVs are not only observed in the coding genes but also in non-coding genes. CNVs in six genes were identified, including HSF1, TMEM249, MROH1, GSTT2B, ABR, and NOMO2, only in NAC-resistant patients. The comparison of these six genes in NAC-resistant patients with The Cancer Genome Atlas data illustrated that the total alteration frequency is amplification, and the highest incidence of the CNVs (≥35% based on TCGA data) is found in MROH1, TMEM249, and HSF1 genes on the chromosome (Chr) 8. Based on TCGA data, survival analysis showed a significant reduction in the overall survival among chemotherapy-resistant patients as well as a high expression level of these three genes compared to that of sensitive samples (all, p < 0.0001). The continued Chr8 study using WISECONDORX revealed CNV modifications in NAC-resistant patients prior to NAC therapy, but no CNV changes were observed in NAC-sensitive individuals. Our findings showed that low coverage whole-genome sequencing analysis used for NIPT could identify CNVs in ctDNA of OC patients before and after chemotherapy. These CNVs are different in NAC-sensitive and -resistant patients highlighting the potential application of this approach in cancer patient management.