1
|
Hudson P, Francis J, Cohen J, Kapp S, De Abreu Lourenco R, Beatty L, Gray K, Jefford M, Juraskova I, Northouse L, de Vleminck A, Chang S, Yates P, Athan S, Baptista S, Klaic M, Philip J. Improving the Well-Being of People With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: Protocol for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of a Dyadic Digital Health Intervention (FOCUSau). JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e55252. [PMID: 39137414 DOI: 10.2196/55252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced cancer significantly impacts patients' and family caregivers' quality of life. When patients and caregivers are supported concurrently as a dyad, the well-being of each person is optimized. Family, Outlook, Communication, Uncertainty, Symptom management (FOCUS) is a dyadic, psychoeducational intervention developed in the United States, shown to improve the well-being and quality of life of patients with advanced cancer and their primary caregivers. Originally, a nurse-delivered in-person intervention, FOCUS has been adapted into a self-administered web-based intervention for European delivery. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study are to (1) adapt FOCUS to the Australian context (FOCUSau); (2) evaluate the effectiveness of FOCUSau in improving the emotional well-being and self-efficacy of patients with advanced cancer and their primary caregiver relative to usual care control group; (3) compare health care use between the intervention and control groups; and (4) assess the acceptability, feasibility, and scalability of FOCUSau in order to inform future maintainable implementation of the intervention within the Australian health care system. METHODS FOCUS will be adapted prior to trial commencement, using an iterative stakeholder feedback process to create FOCUSau. To examine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of FOCUSau and assess its acceptability, feasibility, and scalability, we will undertake a hybrid type 1 implementation study consisting of a phase 3 (clinical effectiveness) trial along with an observational implementation study. Participants will include patients with cancer who are older than 18 years, able to access the internet, and able to identify a primary support person or caregiver who can also be approached for participation. The sample size consists of 173 dyads in each arm (ie, 346 dyads in total). Patient-caregiver dyad data will be collected at 3 time points-baseline (T0) completed prerandomization; first follow-up (T1; N=346) at 12 weeks post baseline; and second follow-up (T2) at 24 weeks post baseline. RESULTS The study was funded in March 2022. Recruitment commenced in July 2024. CONCLUSIONS If shown to be effective, this intervention will improve the well-being of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers, regardless of their location or current level of health care support. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06082128; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06082128. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/55252.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hudson
- Centre for Palliative Care, c/o St Vincent's Hospital and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jill Francis
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Joachim Cohen
- End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Suzanne Kapp
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Beatty
- College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kathleen Gray
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ilona Juraskova
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Laurel Northouse
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Aline de Vleminck
- End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sungwon Chang
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sophy Athan
- Cancer Consumer Advisory Committee, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shaira Baptista
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marlena Klaic
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- St. Vincent's Hospital and the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dickson K, Michael O, Drahota A, Sridhar A, Tschida J, Locke J. Applying the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies Methodology to Inform the Redesign of a Selection-Quality Implementation Toolkit for Use in Schools. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4505754. [PMID: 39108478 PMCID: PMC11302685 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4505754/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Implementation strategies are key to enhancing translation of new innovations but there is a need to systematically design and tailor strategies to match the targeted implementation context and address determinants. There are increasing methods to inform the redesign and tailoring of implementation strategies to maximize their usability, feasibility, and appropriateness in new settings such as the Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS) approach. The aim of the current project is to apply the CWIS approach to inform the redesign of a multifaceted selection-quality implementation toolkit entitled ACT SMARTS for use in middle and high schools. Methods We systematically applied CWIS as the second part of a community-partnered iterative redesign of ACT SMARTS for schools to evaluate the usability and inform further toolkit redesign areas. We conducted three CWIS user testing sessions with key end users of school district administrators, school principals, and educators. Results Our CWIS application revealed that end users found ACT SMARTS acceptable and relevant but anticipate usability issues engaging in the ACT SMARTS process. Results informed the identification of eleven usability issues and corresponding redesign solutions to enhance the usability of ACT SMARTS for use in middle and high schools. Conclusions Results indicated the utility of CWIS in assessing implementation strategy usability in service of informing strategy tailoring and redesign to improve alignment with user and setting needs. Recommendations regarding the use of this participatory approach are discussed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuske S, Köberlein-Neu J. [Implementing systematically: To what extent can implementation science make an educational contribution to health care practice?]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2024; 184:34-39. [PMID: 38296739 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation science is currently struggling with the challenge to translate its findings into implementation practice in health care. Therefore, it is of interest to explore to what extent advanced trainings are relevant for health care practice to support knowledge circulation, and what needs to be considered in their design. DESIGN OF EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES AND TRAINING Internationally, numerous initiatives have emerged in recent years to make implementation science more accessible to health care implementers. They focus, in particular, on the development of curricula for actors in health care practice and the widespread implementation of these qualification programs. In German-speaking countries, the interest in health services research is particularly evident at the level of Master's degree programs to make implementation science accessible to health care. However, these efforts need to be complemented by a participatory, needs-oriented and theory-based approach to advanced training for implementers in health care practice. This will enable the required competencies to be addressed on different levels of training and the further development of training formats. DISCUSSION Recent literature shows that implementers in German-speaking countries can benefit from a training program tailored to their needs. International experience in the field of advanced training in implementation science for health care practice allows us to derive essential components for the development of advanced training for the German-speaking region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Kuske
- Fliedner Fachhochschule, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|