Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction: are there albumin alternatives?

Role of albumin infusion in cirrhosis-associated complications

Cirrhosis is an advanced-stage liver disease that occurs due to persistent physiological insults such as excessive alcohol consumption, infections, or toxicity. It is characterised by scar tissue formation, portal hypertension, and ascites (accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity) in decompensated cirrhosis. This review evaluates how albumin infusion ameliorates cirrhosis-associated complications. Since albumin is an oncotic plasma protein, albumin infusion allows movement of water into the intravascular space, aids with fluid resuscitation, and thereby contributes to resolving cirrhosis-induced hypovolemia (loss of extracellular fluid) seen in ascites. Thus, albumin infusion helps prevent paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction, a complication that occurs when treating ascites. When cirrhosis advances, other complications such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome can manifest. Infused albumin helps mitigate these by exhibiting plasma expansion, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory functions. In hepatic encephalopathy, albumin infusion is thought to improve cognitive function by reducing ammonia concentration in blood and thereby tackle cirrhosis-induced hepatocyte malfunction in ammonia clearance. Infused albumin can also exhibit protective effects by binding to the cirrhosis-induced proinflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL6. While albumin administration has shown to prolong overall survival of cirrhotic patients with ascites in the ANSWER trial, the ATTIRE and MACHT trials have shown either no effect or limitations such as development of pulmonary oedema and multiorgan failure.  Thus, albumin infusion is not a generic treatment option for all cirrhosis patients. Interestingly, cirrhosis-induced structural alterations in native albumin (which lead to formation of different albumin isoforms) can be used as prognostic biomarkers because specific albumin isoforms indicate certain complications of decompensated cirrhosis.

Renal dysfunctions and liver disease: a brief update on management with particular attention to hepatorenal syndrome

In 2015 the International Club of Ascites gave an accurate, exact and new definition of acute renal injury in cirrhotic patient, identifying objective criteria of severity and recoding hepatorenal syndrome as a particular form of renal dysfunction for which excessive renal vasoconstriction is one of the main, but not the only, pathophysiological mechanisms. In this review we tried to outline new pathophysiological and therapeutic insights, and to summarize the most recent recommendations. Vasopressor such as terlipressin and norepinephrine, in combination with albumin, still represent the first line therapy. However, the new discoveries in the pathophysiology of the disease have led the search for new pharmacological approaches, although, to date, the only definitive remedy is represented by liver (or simultaneous liver-kidney) transplantation.

Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Way for Early and Accurate Diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a devastating consequence of liver cirrhosis that is clinically categorized into two subtypes. Acute malfunction of renal role, as measured by an elevation in blood creatinine, significantly underestimates the loss in renal function in cirrhotic individuals; more accurate biomarkers are desperately required in cirrhotic patients. AIM: The present study set out to uncover new biomarkers for the early prediction of AKI in cirrhotic cases. A comprehensive panel of biomarkers was investigated to get a clear insight into the pathogenesis of HRS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants in this study were 70 individuals from the hepatogastroenterology unit of the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI). Detailed medical data and a physical examination were recorded. Three groups of patients have been identified; Group 1: 30 cases with compensated liver cirrhosis and normal kidney functions. Group 2: 20 cases with decompensated liver cirrhosis and normal kidney functions. Group 3: 20 cases with decompensated liver cirrhosis proved hepatorenal syndrome Type 2 h. The following biomarkers were detected in serum using the sandwich-ELISA method: Human L-arginine ELISA kit, human neutrophil gelatinase related lipocalin (NGAL), human noradrenaline (NA), human asymmetrical dimethylarginine (ADMA), human symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), human nitric oxide (NO), and human renin. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in NITRIC and ADMA. Significant differences between Groups 2 and 3 in NGAL, noradrenalin, and SDMA were observed. There was a significant difference (Group 2 vs. Group 3) in renin, NITRIC, ADMA, and L-ARGININE. There was highly significant differentiation (Group 2 vs. Group 3) in NGAL, noradrenalin, and SDMA. There was highly significant variation as per odd ratio and confidence interval between (Group 3 vs. Group 2) in NGAL. CONCLUSION: Assessment of renal biomarkers in individuals with decompensated cirrhosis gives critical information on the etiology of AKI. Further, it may aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of AKI. Renin, NITRIC, ADMA, and L-ARGININE could be used as biomarkers to indicate HRS in individuals with advanced cirrhosis.

Management of Flood syndrome: What can we do better?

Approximately 20% of cirrhotic patients with ascites develop umbilical herniation. These patients usually suffer from multisystemic complications of cirrhosis, have a significantly higher risk of infection, and require accurate surveillance– especially in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The rupture of an umbilical hernia, is an uncommon, life-threatening complication of large-volume ascites and end-stage liver disease resulting in spontaneous paracentesis, also known as Flood syndrome. Flood syndrome remains a challenging condition for clinicians, as recommendations for its management are lacking, and the available evidence for the best treatment approach remains controversial. In this paper, four key questions are addressed regarding the management and prevention of Flood syndrome: (1) Which is the best treatment approach–conservative treatment or urgent surgery? (2) How can we establish the individual risk for herniation and possible hernia rupture in cirrhotic patients? (3) How can we prevent umbilical hernia ruptures? And (4) How can we manage these patients in the conditions created by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic?