Testing an Intervention to Decrease Healthcare Workers' Exposure to Antineoplastic Agents

Workplace interventions focusing on how to plan, organize and design the work environment in hospital settings: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Occupational Health Service (OHS) is a service that should support employers and employees with their work environment. Previous research indicates the need for deeper knowledge about the effect of workplace interventions with a focus on planning, organizing and designing the workplace to improve work conditions in hospital settings.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the outcomes, workplace interventions and intervention strategies in hospital settings.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched in September 2021. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Study results are presented through a narrative synthesis. A protocol for this study was registered on the Open Science Framework.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies, published between 2010 and 2021, were included. These included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and mixed methods reports with moderate to good quality. The results support the use of workplace interventions to improve work conditions, health, and well-being in hospital settings. Combinations of different interventions, tailored to the specific organization, were used. Important intervention strategies commonly used in the start-up, evaluation, and intervention of successful workplace interventions, were identified. Using a pragmatist complexity approach in workplace interventions can improve outcomes by providing clear intervention strategies and combinations of tailored interventions, related to context specific problems.

CONCLUSION

OHS support in workplace interventions with clear intervention strategies will contribute to improve work conditions, health and well-being in hospital settings.

Psychometric Testing of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

Adherence by oncology nurses to chemotherapy safe handling guidelines is essential to prevent hazards of chemotherapy exposure. A review of the literature revealed the need for an instrument with evidence of reliability and validity to measure factors influencing adherence to safe chemotherapy-handling guidelines among oncology nurses. The purpose of this study was to psychometrically test the Oncology Nurses' Health Behaviors Determinants Scale (HBDS-ON) that measures the mentioned factors.

DATA SOURCES

Methodological research of a quantitative cross-sectional survey design was used. The study surveys were administered by email to a sample of 108 oncology nurses. Cronbach alpha, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring, and convergence validity testing were used to test reliability and validity.

CONCLUSION

Factor analysis yielded six subscales, each having acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha between 0.70 and 0.88). The subscales included four oncology nurse health beliefs (perceived threat, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy), cues to action, and personal protective equipment availability and accessibility. Convergence validity testing results support the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinant Scale (HBDS-ON) construct validity. Oncology nurses' self-efficacy to adherence to chemotherapy-handling guidelines, the perceived barriers to adhere to chemotherapy-handling guidelines, and cues to action are associated with adherence to chemotherapy-handling guidelines.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses' health beliefs, the cues to action, and personal protection equipment availability and accessibility are important determinants of nurses' adherence to chemotherapy-handling guidelines. The HBDS-ON is an instrument that has evidence of reliability and validity and could be used in practice to measure these determinants.

The Factors That Influence Chemotherapy Exposure Among Nurses: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

Exposure to chemotherapy is an occupational hazard predisposing nurses to severe health effects. The purpose of this integrative review was to identify the recent literature describing the risk factors for occupational exposure to chemotherapy among nurses.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was employed to conduct the review. The databases searched were Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL using the search terms "chemotherapy," "drugs," "exposure," and "nurses." Included articles were published between January 2010 and February 2022, published in peer-reviewed journals for research conducted in the United States, and written in English language. Excluded articles were studies that did not involve nurses in their samples. Review articles, books, theses, and dissertations were excluded as well. The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model was used to assess the level of evidence from the reviewed studies.

FINDINGS

Fourteen studies were included in this review. Ten studies were rated on Evidence Level III, two on Evidence Level II, one on Evidence Level I, and one on Evidence Level V. The main risk factors for occupational exposure were nurses' knowledge of chemotherapy handling guidelines, nurses' adherence to using the personal protective equipment, nurses' health beliefs regarding chemotherapy exposure, and workplace-related factors such as workload and managerial support.

CONCLUSION

Addressing the identified risk factors would protect nurses from chemotherapy exposure. More research on nurses' health beliefs regarding chemotherapy exposure and the cues to adhere to chemotherapy handling guidelines in the work environment is needed.

The Development and the Content Validation of the Oncology Nurses Health Behaviors Determinants Scale

OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy exposure is an occupational hazard affecting oncology nurses. The adherence to chemotherapy-handling guidelines is essential to prevent exposure to these drugs. Oncology nurses' health beliefs and the cues in the environment are factors influencing the adherence to these guidelines. There is a lack of instruments with evidence of reliability and validity in the literature that address these factors. The purpose of this article is to describe the development and the content validation of the Oncology Nurses' Health Behaviors' Determinants Scale relative to adherence to chemotherapy-handling guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

This study was conducted in two phases: item development, then, content validation using a quantitative cross-sectional design with an exploratory part. A convenience sample of seven experts reviewed the items for relevance, wording, and comprehensiveness. The initial version of the scale that was sent to experts contained 65 items.

CONCLUSION

The Oncology Nurses' Health Behaviors Determinants' Scale has evidence of content validity. Twenty-eight items in the final instrument met the required level of content validity (item content validity index = 0.83). Four additional items were retained due to conceptual significance. Two items were added. The final scale contains 34 items with a total scale content validity index = 0.90.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This newly developed instrument could be used to assess the factors that influence chemotherapy exposure among oncology nurses in the light of the Health Belief Model. Following that, interventions can be developed and implemented to foster greater adherence to safe chemotherapy handling guidelines.