Moral Distress: One Unit’s Recognition and Mitigation of This Problem

Moral Distress of Intensive Care Nurses: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study Two Years after the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed great pressure on healthcare facilities, exposing healthcare professionals to various challenges that may result in the onset of moral distress, a condition of psychological distress caused by the inability to act as it would be most morally appropriate. The purpose of this research was to investigate the experience lived by nurses who worked in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This is a phenomenological study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sixteen nurses who worked in the COVID-19 Intensive Care Unit of Northern Italian Hospitals from January to April 2022 were selected through purposive sampling. Data on experiences, thoughts, and symptoms were collected through semi-structured interviews with in-person and remote modalities.

RESULTS

Five themes and fourteen subthemes emerged from the study. The themes are: (1) pride, isolation, and fear; (2) teamwork and organisation; (3) moral/ethical aspect; (4) true heroes; and (5) dignity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intensive care unit nurses. It has emerged that the risk of moral distress is high among healthcare workers in the front line of the fight against the virus. This condition should be avoided and managed through early psychological interventions, sharing of experiences, and a good organization that supports decision-making and professional well-being.

Mitigating Moral Distress in Leaders of Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review

GOAL

Moral distress literature is firmly rooted in the nursing and clinician experience, with a paucity of literature that considers the extent to which moral distress affects clinical and administrative healthcare leaders. Moreover, the little evidence that has been collected on this phenomenon has not been systematically mapped to identify key areas for both theoretical and practical elaboration. We conducted a scoping review to frame our understanding of this largely unexplored dynamic of moral distress and better situate our existing knowledge of moral distress and leadership.

METHODS

Using moral distress theory as our conceptual framework, we evaluated recent literature on moral distress and leadership to understand how prior studies have conceptualized the effects of moral distress. Our search yielded 1,640 total abstracts. Further screening with the PRISMA process resulted in 72 included articles.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Our scoping review found that leaders-not just their employees- personally experience moral distress. In addition, we identified an important role for leaders and organizations in addressing the theoretical conceptualization and practical effects of moral distress.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Although moral distress is unlikely to ever be eliminated, the literature in this review points to a singular need for organizational responses that are intended to intervene at the level of the organization itself, not just at the individual level. Best practices require creating stronger organizational cultures that are designed to mitigate moral distress. This can be achieved through transparency and alignment of personal, professional, and organizational values.

PASTRY: A nursing-developed quality improvement initiative to combat moral distress

BACKGROUND

High levels of moral distress in nursing professionals, of which oncology nurses are particularly prone, can negatively impact patient care, job satisfaction, and retention.

AIM

"Positive Attitudes Striving to Rejuvenate You: PASTRY" was developed at a tertiary cancer center to reduce the burden of moral distress among oncology nurses.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A Quality Improvement (QI) initiative was conducted using a pre- and post-intervention design, to launch PASTRY and measure its impact on moral distress of the nursing unit, using Hamric's Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R.) This program consisted of monthly 60-minute sessions allowing nurses to address morally distressing events and themes, such as clinicians giving "false hope" to patients or families. The PASTRY program sessions were led by certified clinicians utilizing strategies of discussion and mind-body practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinical nurses working on an adult leukemia/lymphoma unit.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

This was a QI initiative, participation was voluntary, MDS-R responses were collected anonymously, and the institution's Ethics Committee oversaw PASTRY's implementation.

FINDINGS

While improvement in moral distress findings were not statistically significant, the qualitative and quantitative findings demonstrated consistent themes. The PASTRY program received strong support from nurses and institutional leaders, lowered the nursing unit's moral distress, led to enhanced camaraderie, and improved nurses' coping skills.

DISCUSSION

Measurement of moral distress is innately challenging due to its complexity. This study reinforces oncology nurses have measurable moral distress. Interventions should be implemented for a safe and healing environment to explore morally distressing clinical experiences. Poor communication among multidisciplinary team members is associated with moral distress among nurses. Programs like PASTRY may empower nurses to build support networks for change within themselves and institutions.

CONCLUSION

This QI initiative shows further research on moral distress reduction should be conducted to verify findings for statistical significance and so that institutional programs, like PASTRY, can be created.

Moral distress interventions: An integrative literature review

Moral distress has been well reviewed in the literature with established deleterious side effects for all healthcare professionals, including nurses, physicians, and others. Yet, little is known about the quality and effectiveness of interventions directed to address moral distress. The aim of this integrative review is to analyze published intervention studies to determine their efficacy and applicability across hospital settings. Of the initial 1373 articles discovered in October 2020, 18 were appraised as relevant, with 1 study added by hand search and 2 after a repeated search was completed in January and then in May of 2021, for a total of 22 reviewed articles. This review revealed data mostly from nurses, with some studies making efforts to include other healthcare professions who have experienced moral distress. Education-based interventions showed the most success, though many reported limited power and few revealed statistically lowered moral distress post intervention. This may point to the difficulty in adequately addressing moral distress in real time without adequate support systems. Ultimately, these studies suggest potential frameworks which, when bolstered by organization-wide support, may aid in moral distress interventions making a measurable impact.

Moral Distress Among Interdisciplinary Critical Care Team Members at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Moral distress (MD) has been linked to health care professional burnout, intent to leave, and decreased quality of care.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the perceptions of MD among critical care interdisciplinary team members and assess the association of MD with team member characteristics.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional design was used with interdisciplinary team members in an intensive care unit setting at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in the southeastern United States. The Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals was provided to registered nurses, oncology technicians, providers, respiratory therapists, and ancillary team members (social workers, pharmacists, dietitians).

RESULTS

A total of 67 team members completed the survey. Mean responses for 3 items were higher than 8 (halfway point of scale): "Follow family's insistence to continue aggressive treatment even though I believe it is not in the best interest of patient" (mean [SD], 11.4 [4.8]); "Continue to provide aggressive treatment for a patient most likely to die regardless of this treatment when no one will make a decision to withdraw it" (mean [SD], 10.5 [5.3]); and "Witness providers giving 'false hope' to patient/family" (mean [SD], 9.0 [5.3]). Higher responses on the "Continuing to provide aggressive treatment" item was associated with having "considered leaving due to MD" (P = .027) and "considering leaving now due to MD" (P = .016). Higher total scores were related to having left or considered leaving a job (P = .04). When examining education level, registered nurses with a master's degree (n = 5) exhibited the most MD (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals is useful in identifying areas for focused efforts at reducing MD for interdisciplinary teams.

Moral Distress: A Qualitative Study of Experiences Among Oncology Team Members

BACKGROUND

Oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs), particularly nurses, experience moral distress. However, little is known about the impact of moral distress on oncology teams.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe moral distress as it is experienced by oncology teams in practice.

METHODS

32 oncology team members participated in eight focus groups. Content analysis was used to identify key themes. Two investigators collaboratively analyzed the data, and findings were independently reviewed by two additional investigators.

FINDINGS

The following six themes emerged.

Ethical Problems and Moral Distress in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Background: Since 1997, nursing ethics research has focused on solving ethical dilemmas, enhancing decision-making strategies, and introducing professional education. Few studies describe the triggers of ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses. The aim of this study was to explore the moral distress and ethical dilemmas among primary care nurses. Methods: A scoping review was performed following Arskey and O’Malley’s framework. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Scopus were searched systematically to retrieve relevant titles and abstracts. A temporal filter was applied to focus on the most recent literature (years of 2010–2020). The research was completed on 17 November 2020. Results: Of 184 articles retrieved, 15 were included in the review. Some (n = 7) studies had a qualitative design, and the most productive country was Brazil (n = 7). The total number of nurses involved in quantitative studies was 1137 (range: 36–433); the total number of nurses involved in qualitative studies was 144 (range: 7–73). Three main focus areas were identified: (a) frequent ethical conflicts and moral distress episodes among nurses working in primary care settings; (b) frequent moral distress measures here employed; (c) coping strategies here adopted to prevent or manage moral distress. Conclusion: Further research is needed to examine the differences between moral distress triggers and sources of ethical dilemmas among the different care environments, such as primary care and acute care settings.

Recommendations for navigating the experiences of moral distress: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Moral distress is a complex ethical phenomenon that occurs when one is not able to act according to their moral judgement. Consequences of moral distress negatively impact nurses, patient care, and the healthcare system. There is limited evidence on specific approaches to prepare nurses to manage these ethical situations.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review is to identify moral distress interventions for nurses who provide direct patient care, identify gaps in the current moral distress research, and determine areas of focus for future research on this topic.

METHODS

We employed the framework outlined by Levac, Colquhoun, and O'Brien and Arksey and O'Malley to conduct a scoping review. These steps included the: identification of the research question, identification of relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. We appraised the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

We identified 5206 articles from the selected databases. Once duplicates were removed, two independent reviewers each screened 4043 title and abstracts. We included 554 articles for full-text screening, with 10 studies included based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study designs included before-after studies (n = 4), randomized control trials (n = 3), concurrent mixed-methods studies (n = 2), and one controlled before-after study. All studies were conducted in acute care settings. In four studies, interventions focused on informing nurses on moral distress. Two interventions focused on increasing the nurses' reflexivity on their workplace experiences. One intervention included formal clinical mentoring and clinical ethics support through interprofessional rounds. Two studies utilized a multicomponent intervention. The overall moral distress scores significantly decreased after intervention implementation in three included studies. Three additional studies showed significant differences in specific survey item scores (e.g., "provision of less-than-optimal care" and "caring for patients they did not feel qualified to care for"), as compared to overall scores, after intervention implementation. In 70% of studies the amount of quality criteria met were 60% or higher according to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

CONCLUSION

Our review is the first to synthesize intervention studies pertaining to moral distress among nurses. The findings of this review demonstrate that there is no clear pattern regarding which strategies consistently minimize the effects of moral distress among nurses. Future interventions should be tested more broadly by increasing the sample size, assessing length of intervention in relation to moral distress scores, expanding the interventions to other units and institutions, and including other healthcare professionals. Tweetable abstract: We reviewed interventions to help nurses with moral distress. Findings show no clear pattern of strategies to minimize their moral distress.