Common and Co-Occurring Symptoms Experienced by Patients With Gastric Cancer

The change of symptom clusters in gastric cancer patients during the perioperative period: a longitudinal study

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe the number, type and trajectory of symptom clusters during the perioperative period in patients with gastric cancer at four different time points. The study also aimed to identify the changes and consistency of these symptom clusters over time.

DESIGN

This was a longitudinal study.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a tertiary cancer hospital with 205 patients with gastric cancer. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer Module was used to assess the incidence and severity of symptom clusters. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract symptom clusters.

RESULTS

The study identified four symptom clusters in patients with gastric cancer during the perioperative period: gastrointestinal symptom cluster, physical symptom cluster, psychological symptom cluster, and sleep disturbance symptom cluster. These clusters were observed across two to four time points.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study provide scientific evidence for medical staff and researchers to better understand the symptoms of patients with gastrointestinal cancer during the perioperative period. These findings can help develop individualized interventions for managing symptoms.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Gastric cancer patients suffered from various symptom clusters, which lasted from one day before surgery to one month after surgery. They should be given careful consideration by clinical staff.

A predictive nomogram developed and validated for gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers

Aim: To predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers. Materials & methods: Prognostic factors of the nomogram were identified through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Calibration and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess accuracy. Decision curve analysis and concordance indexes were utilized to compare the nomogram with the pathological tumor, node, metastasis stage. Results: A nomogram incorporating log odds of positive lymph nodes, tumor size and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was constructed. The calibration and receiver operating characteristic curves (area under the curve >0.85) showed high accuracy in predicting overall survival. The concordance indexes (0.832 vs 0.760; p < 0.001) and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was superior to the pathological tumor, node, metastasis stage. Conclusion: A prediction and risk stratification nomogram has been developed and validated for gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers.

Systematic Review of the Literature on Multiple Co-occurring Symptoms in Patients Receiving Treatment for Gynecologic Cancers

OBJECTIVE

Patients with gynecologic cancers experience a very high symptom burden that has a negative impact on their quality of life. This systematic review aims to identify the common co-occurring symptoms, the prevalence of common symptoms, common instruments used to measure symptoms, associated risk factors, and the symptom burden in patients with gynecologic cancers.

DATA SOURCES

A search of four databases (ie, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL) was done from January 1, 2012, through September 5, 2022. A qualitative synthesis of the extant literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA 2020).

CONCLUSION

A total of 118 studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria. Ninety-six symptoms were assessed across these studies. The top six symptoms and their grand mean prevalence rates were lack of energy (64.4%), fatigue (62.1%), abdominal pain (53.3%), depression (52.6%), concentration dysfunction (52.0%), and drowsiness (51.9%). Numerous methodologic challenges were evident across studies. Future research needs to develop a disease-specific symptom assessment measure, evaluate for risk factors associated with a higher symptom burden, and determine the impact of multiple symptoms on patient outcomes.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The results are relevant for oncology clinicians to assess patients with gynecologic cancers for the presence of common symptoms and risk factors for higher symptom burden in the patients and to offer effective management interventions.

Distinct morning and evening fatigue profiles in gastrointestinal cancer during chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Purposes were to identify subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers with distinct morning and evening fatigue severity profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics, co-occurring symptoms and quality of life (QOL) outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with gastrointestinal cancers (n=405) completed questionnaires six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify distinct morning and evening fatigue profiles. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, co-occurring symptoms and QOL outcomes among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Two distinct mornings (ie, low and very high) and three distinct evenings (ie, low, moderate and very high) fatigue classes were identified. Common risk factors for both morning and evening fatigue included younger age, lower performance status, higher comorbidity burden and self-reported depression. Higher levels of morning fatigue were associated with being unmarried, living alone, being unemployed, having a lower income, lack of regular exercise and a self-reported diagnosis of anaemia. Higher levels of evening fatigue were associated with being women, white and having childcare responsibilities. Patients in the very high morning and evening fatigue classes reported higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance and pain and lower levels of attentional function and poorer QOL.

CONCLUSION

Findings provide new insights into risk factors for and deleterious effects of morning and evening fatigue in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Clinicians can use this information to identify high-risk patients and develop individualised interventions for morning and evening fatigue and other co-occurring symptoms.

Associations of differentially expressed genes with psychoneurological symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer: A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience psychoneurological symptoms (PNS, i.e., depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) that negatively impact their functional status, quality of life, and overall survival. The underlying mechanisms for PNS are still not fully understood. This study aimed to examine differentially expressed genes and pathways related to PNS for patients undergoing IMRT (i.e., before, end of, 6 months, and 12 months after IMRT).

METHODS

Participants included 142 patients with HNC (mean age 58.9 ± 10.3 years, 72.5% male, 83.1% White). Total RNA extracted from blood leukocytes were used for genome-wide gene expression assays. Linear mixed effects model was used to examine the association between PNS and gene expression across time. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was employed to identify pathways related to PNS.

RESULTS

A total of 1352 genes (162 upregulated, 1190 downregulated) were significantly associated with PNS across time (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05). Among these genes, 112 GO terms were identified (FDR < 0.05). The top 20 GO terms among the significant upregulated genes were related to immune and inflammatory responses, while the top 20 GO terms among the significant downregulated genes were associated with telomere maintenance.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to identify genes and pathways linked to immune and inflammatory responses and telomere maintenance that are associated with PNS in patients with HNC receiving IMRT. Inflammation and aging markers may be candidate biomarkers for PNS. Understanding biological markers may produce targets for novel interventions.

A Web-Based Dyadic Intervention to Manage Psychoneurological Symptoms for Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving chemotherapy often experience psychoneurological symptoms (PNS; ie, fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction) that negatively impact both patients' and their caregivers' health outcomes. Limited information is available on PNS management for CRC patient and caregiver dyads.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study are to (1) develop a web-based dyadic intervention for patients with CRC receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers (CRCweb) and (2) evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of CRCweb among patient-caregiver dyads in a cancer clinic.

METHODS

A mixed methods approach will be used. Semistructured interviews among 8 dyads will be conducted to develop CRCweb. A single-group pre- and posttest clinical trial will be used to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the intervention (CRCweb) among 20 dyads. Study assessments will be conducted before (T1) and after intervention (T2). Content analysis will be performed for semistructured interviews. Descriptive statistics will be calculated separately for patients and caregivers, and pre-post paired t tests will be used to evaluate treatment effects.

RESULTS

This study was funded in November 2022. As of April 2023, we have obtained institutional review board approval and completed clinical trial registration and are currently recruiting patient-caregiver dyads in a cancer clinic. The study is expected to be completed in October 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing a web-based dyadic intervention holds great promise to reduce the PNS burden in patients with CRC receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers. The findings from this study will advance intervention development and implementation of symptom management and palliative care for patients with cancer and their caregivers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05663203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05663203.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/48499.

Study on sentinel symptoms and influencing factors of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the symptom clusters of gastric cancer patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy, identify the sentinel symptom of each symptom cluster, and compare the differences in sentinel symptoms of patients for gastric cancer with different characteristics.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with postoperative gastric cancer who received chemotherapy in the medical oncology department from October 2021 to July 2022 were selected for the study using a convenience sampling method.The General Information Questionnaire and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) were used for the survey.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients participated in the study. There were five symptom clusters in the patients. Fatigue, nausea, sadness, and taste alteration were the sentinel symptoms of the disease symptom cluster, gastrointestinal symptom cluster, emotional symptom cluster, and neurotoxic symptom cluster, respectively. No clear sentinel symptom was found in the gastric-cancer-specific symptom cluster. Statistically significant differences were observed in fatigue, nausea, sadness, and taste alteration among patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer with differences in gender, duration since diagnosis, tumor site, chemotherapy regimen, chemotherapy cycle, red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, albumin level, plasma D-dimer level, indirect bilirubin level, glutamic pyruvic transaminase level, total bile acid level, and uric acid level.

CONCLUSION

People with postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer experience multiple concurrent symptoms. Of the multiple symptoms that occur simultaneously, patients tend to focus on 1 or 2 symptoms of particular significance and use the occurrence of 1 symptom to explain the others. The understanding of symptom clusters and sentinel symptoms could be beneficial to assess and manage both in postoperative patients with gastric cancer during chemotherapy. Clinical staff should use sentinel symptoms as the targets for symptom cluster evaluation and effective intervention.

Symptom Clusters and Quality of Life in Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

CONTEXT

Although gastric cancer is one of the most common tumors worldwide, there is little knowledge about symptom clusters and quality of life (QoL) in this population.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to identify the symptom clusters in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, and explore their effects on QoL.

METHODS

Gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were recruited. Data were collected using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric and the self-designed General Information Evaluation Form. The symptom clusters were extracted through the exploratory factor analysis. The influencing factors of symptom clusters and their effects on QoL were identified using multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 322 participants were enrolled from three medical centers. Five factors were identified in this exploratory factor analysis based on symptom prevalence, namely fatigue related symptom cluster, epithelial symptom cluster, neurologic symptom cluster, malnutrition related symptom cluster and psychological symptom cluster (χ² = 31.470, P < 0.05). The affecting factors across symptom clusters and QoL subscales were relatively stable, but also different. Generally, fatigue related symptom cluster, malnutrition related symptom cluster and psychological symptom cluster demonstrated significantly negative effects on all aspects of QoL except social well being.

CONCLUSION

Five symptom clusters were identified in gastric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in mainland China. The symptom clusters negatively contributed to the variance in all aspects of QoL except social well being. Further studies should examine interventions for symptom clusters, their influencing factors, and their effects on improving QoL.

Distinct Sleep Disturbance Profiles in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastrointestinal cancers experience moderate to high levels of sleep disturbance during chemotherapy that decreases their functional status and quality of life (QOL).

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to identify subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers with distinct sleep disturbance profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic, clinical, and sleep characteristics, as well as co-occurring symptoms and QOL outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (n = 405) completed questionnaires 6 times over 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct sleep disturbance profiles.

RESULTS

Three distinct sleep disturbance profiles (ie, low, high, very high) were identified. Compared with the low class, patients in the other 2 classes were significantly younger and less likely to be married and to exercise on a regular basis and received a higher number of previous treatments. Compared with the low class, patients in the other 2 classes reported higher levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, morning and evening fatigue, and pain and lower levels of attentional function and QOL scores at enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to use latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of patients with gastrointestinal cancers with distinct sleep disturbance profiles. Findings provide new insights on the associations between sleep disturbance and multiple co-occurring symptoms in these patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians can identify patients who are at the highest risk for sleep disturbance and recommend a variety of sleep hygiene interventions (eg, establishment of a bedtime routine), as well as initiate interventions for other co-occurring symptoms.

Nutritional management of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer mortality and is frequently associated with nutritional disorders, the detection and proper management of which can contribute to improving quality of life and survival. Being aware of the consequences and of the different treatments for this neoplasm allows us to offer an adequate nutritional approach. In surgical candidates, integration into ERAS-type programs is increasingly frequent, and includes a pre-surgical nutritional approach and the initiation of early oral tolerance. After gastrectomy, the new anatomical and functional state of the digestive tract may lead to the appearance of "post-gastrectomy syndromes", the management of which may require diet modification and medical treatment. Those who receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant antineoplastic therapy benefit from specific dietary recommendations based on intercurrent symptoms and/or artificial nutrition. In palliative patients, the nutritional approach should be carried out while respecting the principle of autonomy and weighing the risks and benefits of the intervention. The objective of this review is to highlight the importance and role of nutrition in patients with gastric cancer and to provide guidelines for nutritional management based on the current evidence.

Co-Occurrence of Symptoms and Gut Microbiota Composition Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Proof of Concept

PURPOSE

To examine a) whether there are significant differences in gut microbial diversity and in the abundance of gut microbial taxa; and b) differences in predicted functional pathways of the gut microbiome between those participants with high co-occurring symptoms and those with low co-occurring symptoms, prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Rectal cancer patients (n = 41) provided stool samples for 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and symptom ratings for fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms prior to CRT. Descriptive statistics were computed for symptoms. Gut microbiome data were analyzed using QIIME2, LEfSe, and the R statistical package.

RESULTS

Participants with high co-occurring symptoms (n = 19) had significantly higher bacterial abundances of Ezakiella, Clostridium sensu stricto, Porphyromonas, Barnesiella, Coriobacteriales Incertae Sedis, Synergistiaceae, Echerichia-Shigella, and Turicibacter compared to those with low co-occurring symptoms before CRT (n = 22). Biosynthesis pathways for lipopolysaccharide, L-tryptophan, and colanic acid building blocks were enriched in participants with high co-occurring symptoms. Participants with low co-occurring symptoms showed enriched abundances of Enterococcus and Lachnospiraceae, as well as pathways for β-D-glucoronosides, hexuronide/hexuronate, and nicotinate degradation, methanogenesis, and L-lysine biosynthesis.

CONCLUSION

A number of bacterial taxa and predicted functional pathways were differentially abundant in patients with high co-occurring symptoms compared to those with low co-occurring symptoms before CRT for rectal cancer. Detailed examination of bacterial taxa and pathways mediating co-occurring symptoms is warranted.

Distinct profiles of multiple co-occurring symptoms in patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Identify subgroups of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients with distinct multiple co-occurring symptom profiles and evaluate for differences among these subgroups in demographic and clinical characteristics and quality of life (QOL) outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with GI cancers (n = 399) completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) that was used to assess for multiple co-occurring symptoms. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subgroups of patients with distinct symptom profiles using symptom occurrence ratings. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and QOL outcomes among the subgroups were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

All Low (36.6%), Moderate (49.4%), and All High (14.0%) classes were identified. Compared to the All Low class, patients in the other two classes were significantly younger and were more likely to report depression and back pain. Compared to the other two classes, patients in the All High class had fewer years of education and a higher number of comorbidities. Significant differences were found among the three classes for comorbidity burden and total number of MSAS symptoms (i.e., All Low < Moderate < All High), as well as for performance status (i.e., All Low > Moderate > All High). A higher symptom burden was associated with poorer QOL outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The first study to identify subgroups of patients with GI cancers based on distinct symptom profiles. LCA allowed for the identification of risk factors associated with a higher symptom burden. Clinicians can use this information to identify high-risk patients and develop personalized symptom management interventions.

Weight Change Trajectory in Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma During the Peri-Radiation Therapy Period

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the weight change trajectory in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) before, during, and after radiation therapy for a time span of 40 weeks.

SAMPLE & SETTING

147 patients from a university-affiliated medical center in China were included.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Body weight was measured weekly during intensive treatment and biweekly after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

All 147 patients experienced critical weight loss during the peri-radiation therapy period. Overall, body weight remained basically unchanged during induction chemotherapy, followed by a sharp and severe decrease during radiation therapy. At 20 weeks after radiation therapy, body weight had increased only slightly from the lowest point.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

A time-tailored intervention based on the weight change trajectory is necessary for patients with LANPC. According to the weight change trajectory, relevant interventions for maintaining body weight should be initiated as early as the second week of radiation therapy and no later than the fourth week of radiation therapy, and these interventions should continue for at least four weeks after radiation therapy.

Nutritional management of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer mortality and is frequently associated with nutritional disorders, the detection and proper management of which can contribute to improving quality of life and survival. Being aware of the consequences and of the different treatments for this neoplasm allows us to offer an adequate nutritional approach. In surgical candidates, integration into ERAS-type programs (Enhanced Recovery after Surgery) is increasingly frequent, and includes a pre-surgical nutritional approach and the initiation of early oral tolerance. After gastrectomy, the new anatomical and functional state of the digestive tract may lead to the appearance of «post-gastrectomy syndromes», the management of which may require diet modification and medical treatment. Those who receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant antineoplastic therapy benefit from specific dietary recommendations based on intercurrent symptoms and/or artificial nutrition. In palliative patients, the nutritional approach should be carried out while respecting the principle of autonomy and weighing the risks and benefits of the intervention. The objective of this review is to highlight the importance and role of nutrition in patients with gastric cancer and to provide guidelines for nutritional management based on the current evidence.

Gastric carcinoma: Insights into risk factors, methods of diagnosis, possible lines of management, and the role of primary care

Gastric carcinoma represents the second most common type of malignancy that contributes to cancer-related mortality worldwide. However, the geographic incidence of gastric carcinoma had changed over the last few decades, possibly due to increased hygiene, increased awareness of the importance of healthy nutrition, and increased rates of eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastric carcinoma consists of two pathological variants, intestinal and diffuse. Early cases of gastric carcinoma may be asymptomatic. However, advanced cases may present with significant weight loss, dysphagia, abdominal pain, vomiting, and even severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients at high risk of developing gastric carcinoma should be adequately screened at primary healthcare centers for early detection and effective management. Lines of treatment vary according to the stage of the disease but surgical resection of the tumor with regional lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard of therapy. This review sheds light on gastric carcinoma given the recent trends regarding its prevalence, risk factors, types, clinical picture, methods of diagnosis, possible lines of management, and the role of primary care.