Evolution of developmental and comparative immunology in poultry: The regulators and the regulated

Avian has a unique immune system that evolved in response to environmental pressures in all aspects of innate and adaptive immune responses, including localized and circulating lymphocytes, diversity of immunoglobulin repertoire, and various cytokines and chemokines. All of these attributes make birds an indispensable vertebrate model for studying the fundamental immunological concepts and comparative immunology. However, research on the immune system in birds lags far behind that of humans, mice, and other agricultural animal species, and limited immune tools have hindered the adequate application of birds as disease models for mammalian systems. An in-depth understanding of the avian immune system relies on the detailed studies of various regulated and regulatory mediators, such as cell surface antigens, cytokines, and chemokines. Here, we review current knowledge centered on the roles of avian cell surface antigens, cytokines, chemokines, and beyond. Moreover, we provide an update on recent progress in this rapidly developing field of study with respect to the availability of immune reagents that will facilitate the study of regulatory and regulated components of poultry immunity. The new information on avian immunity and available immune tools will benefit avian researchers and evolutionary biologists in conducting fundamental and applied research.

CAM-Xenograft Model Provides Preclinical Evidence for the Applicability of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in CRC Imaging

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Increased expression of CXCR4 has been associated with liver metastasis, disease progression, and shortened survival. Using in vitro cell binding studies and the in ovo model, we aimed to investigate the potential of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor, a radiotracer specifically targeting human CXCR4, for CRC imaging. Specific membrane binding and internalisation of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor was shown for HT29 cells, but not for HCT116 cells. Accordingly, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor accumulated specifically in CAM-xenografts derived from HT29 cells, but not in HCT116 xenografts, as determined by µPET/MRI. The CAM-grown xenografts were histologically characterised, demonstrating vascularisation of the graft, preserved expression of human CXCR4, and viability of the tumour cells within the grafts. In vivo viability was further confirmed by µPET/MRI measurements using 2-[¹⁸F]FDG as a surrogate for glucose metabolism. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor µPET/MRI scans showed distinct radiotracer accumulation in the chick embryonal heart, liver, and kidneys, whereas 2-[¹⁸F]FDG uptake was predominantly found in the kidneys and joints of the chick embryos. Our findings suggest that [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor is an interesting novel radiotracer for CRC imaging that is worth further investigation. Moreover, this study further supports the suitability of the CAM-xenograft model for the initial preclinical evaluation of targeted radiopharmaceuticals.

In and Out of the Bursa-The Role of CXCR4 in Chicken B Cell Development

In contrast to mammals, early B cell differentiation and diversification of the antibody repertoire in chickens do not take place in the bone marrow but in a specialized gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), the bursa of Fabricius. During embryonic development, B cell precursors migrate to the bursa anlage, where they proliferate and diversify their B cell receptor repertoire. Around hatch these diversified B cells start to emigrate from the bursa of Fabricius and populate peripheral lymphoid organs, but very little is known how the migratory processes are regulated. As CXCL12 (syn. SDF-1) and CXCR4 were shown to be essential for the control of B cell migration during the development of lymphoid tissues in mammals, we analyzed expression and function of this chemokine/chemokine-receptor pair in the chicken bursa. We found a strong variation of mRNA abundance of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in different stages of bursa development, with high abundance of CXCL12 mRNA in the bursa anlage at embryonic day 10 (ED10). In situ hybridization demonstrated disseminated CXCL12 expression in the early bursa anlage, which condensed in the developing follicles and was mainly restricted to the follicle cortex post-hatch. Flow cytometric analysis detected CXCR4 protein already on early B cell stages, increasing during bursal development. Post-hatch, a subpopulation with the hallmarks of emigrating B cells became detectable, which had lower CXCR4 expression, suggesting that downregulation of CXCR4 is necessary to leave the CXCL12-high bursal environment. In vivo blockade of CXCR4 using AMD3100 at the time of B cell precursor immigration strongly inhibited follicle development, demonstrating that CXCL12 attracts pre-bursal B cells into the bursal anlage. Altogether, we show that CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 are important for both populating the bursa with B cells and emigration of mature B cells into the periphery post hatch, and that CXCR4 function in primary B cell organs is conserved between mammals and birds.

Blocking of the CXCR4-CXCL12 Interaction Inhibits the Migration of Chicken B Cells Into the Bursa of Fabricius

B cells have first been described in chickens as antibody producing cells and were named after the Bursa of Fabricius, a unique organ supporting their development. Understanding different factors mediating the early migration of B cells into the bursa of Fabricius is crucial for the study of B cell biology. While CXCL12 (stromal derived factor 1) was found to play an important role in B lymphocyte trafficking in mammals, its role in the chicken is still unknown. Previous studies indicated that chicken CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 are simultaneously expressed during bursal development. In this study, we investigated whether the CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction mediates B cell migration in chicken embryo. We used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to induce a CXCR4 knockout in chicken B cells which led to chemotaxis inhibition toward CXCL12. This was confirmed by adoptive cell transfer and inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 interaction by blocking with the small inhibitor AMD3100. In addition, we found that the chicken exhibits similarities to mice when it comes to CXCR4 being dependent on B cell receptor expression. B cells lacking the B cell receptor failed to migrate toward CXCL12 and showed no response upon CXCL12 stimulation. Overall, we demonstrated the significance of CXCR4/CXCL12 in chicken B cell development in vivo and the importance of the B cell receptor in CXCR4 dependent signaling.