The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review

The Challenge of Developing a Regional Palliative Care Data System: A Tale of Two Cities

This article reviews the purposes of health care databases and the findings from a literature review of the use of patient databases in palliative care. We present the history and goals of databases developed in two Canadian settings, Hamilton and Halifax. We present data on the strengths, limitations, and difficulties encountered in each setting. We review the types of data collected and the potential of these databases, and we offer practical recommendations for others looking to set up such systems.

An Evaluation of Systematic Reviews of Palliative Care Services

This review aimed to identify and appraise all systematic reviews of palliative care services, to examine their findings in relation to methods used, and to explore whether further methods such as meta-analysis and meta-regression may be worthwhile. Ten databases were searched and augmented by hand searching specific journals, contacting authors, and examining the reference lists of all papers retrieved. Five systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, and the update electronic search identified a further systematic review which found similar studies. A total of 39 studies were identified by the five systematic reviews. Of the 39 studies, 15 were RCTS, and 12 of those were North American. In comparison, the majority of U.K. studies were retrospective. Each review concluded similarly that there was a lack of good quality evidence on which to base conclusions. The more recent reviews were more rigorous, but none used a quantitative analysis. Despite the difficulties in combining heterogeneous interventions and outcomes in meta-analysis or meta-regression, such techniques may be valuable. More high quality evidence is needed to compare the relative merits of the differences in models of palliative care services, so that countries can learn from other appropriate systems of care at end of life.

Developing a Research Agenda for Adult Palliative Care: A Modified Delphi Study

Background: Little is known about research priorities in adult palliative care. Identifying research priorities for adult palliative care will help in increasing research quality and translation. Objective: The aim was to identify the views of health professionals' research priorities in adult palliative care that lead to development of a palliative care research agenda in Australia. Design: A modified three-round Delphi survey. Setting/Subjects: Palliative care researchers and clinicians in Australia were invited to participate. Results: A total of 25 panelists completed round 1, 14 completed round 2, and 13 completed round 3. Round 1 resulted in 90 research priorities in 13 categories. Round 2 showed consensus agreement on 19/90 research priorities. Round 3 resulted in the top 10 research priorities of the 19 achieving consensus in round 2. Panelists agreed that research is needed on the transition to palliative care; improving communication about prognosis; increasing access to palliative care for indigenous communities, people who wish to remain at home, and people in aged care; addressing family caregivers' needs; promoting patients' and families' decision making; improving cross-cultural aspects of palliative care; determining the effects of assisted dying legislation; and improving bereavement care in rural, remote, and Aboriginal populations. Conclusions: The expert panelists identified the top 10 research priorities for adult palliative care. These identified research priorities are the most urgent topics requiring attention to increase the quality of life of patients requiring palliative care and their family members.

Specialized palliative care in advanced cancer: What is the efficacy? A systematic review

Objective:

Due to the multiple physical, psychological, existential, and social symptoms involved, patients with advanced cancer often have a reduced quality of life (QoL), which requires specialized palliative care (SPC) interventions. The primary objective of the present systematic review was to review the existing literature about SPC and its effect on QoL, on physical and psychological symptoms, and on survival in adult patients with advanced cancer.

Method:

We utilized a search strategy based on the PICO (problem/population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) framework and employed terminology related to cancer, QoL, symptoms, mood, and palliative care. The search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Selected studies were analyzed and categorized according to methods, results, quality of evidence, and strength of recommendation.

Results:

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected for analysis (out of a total of 1,115 studies). Two other studies were found by hand search, one of which was only published in conference abstract form. The RCTs differed in terms of aims, interventions, control groups, and outcomes; however, the primary aim of all of them was to investigate the effect of SPC on patient QoL. Five studies found improved QoL in the intervention group. Physical symptom intensity decreased in two studies, and three studies found improved mood in the intervention group. However, physical and psychological symptoms were secondary outcomes in these studies. Survival was improved in two studies. All the studies offered generalizability, but the level of evidence validity varied among them.

Significance of results:

Due to several methodological limitations, the evidence offered in these studies ranged from low to high. The evidence in this field of study in general is still nascent, but there is growing support for the utilization of SPC to improve the quality of life of adult patients with advanced cancer. The evidence that SPC reduces physical and psychological symptoms is moderate, while the evidence that it prolongs survival is low.

The 'problematisation' of palliative care in hospital: an exploratory review of international palliative care policy in five countries

BACKGROUND

Government policy is a fundamental component of initiating change to improve the provision of palliative care at a national level. The World Health Organisation's recognition of palliative care as a basic human right has seen many countries worldwide develop national policy in palliative and end of life care. There is increasing debate about what form comprehensive palliative care services should take, particularly in relation to the balance between acute and community based services. It is therefore timely to review how national policy positions the current and future role of the acute hospital in palliative care provision. The aim of this exploratory review is to identify the role envisaged for the acute hospital in palliative and end of life care provision in five countries with an 'advanced' level of integration.

METHOD

Countries were identified using the Global Atlas of Palliative Care. Policies were accessed through internet searching of government websites between October and December 2014. Using a process of thematic analysis key themes related to palliative care in hospital were identified.

RESULTS

Policies from Switzerland, England, Singapore, Australia and Ireland were analysed for recurring themes. Three themes were identified: preferences for place of care and place of death outside the hospital setting, unnecessary or avoidable hospital admissions, and quality of care in hospital. No policy focused upon exploring how palliative care could be improved in the hospital setting or indeed what role the hospital may have in the provision of palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care policy in five countries with 'advanced' levels of palliative care integration focuses on solving the 'problems' associated with hospital as a place of palliative care and death. No positive role for hospitals in palliative care provision is envisaged. Given the rapidly increasing population of people requiring palliative care, and emerging evidence that patients themselves report benefits of hospital admissions, this area requires further investigation. In particular, a co-design approach to policy development is needed to ensure that services match the needs and wants of patients and families.

Opportunities for Palliative Care in Public Health

In May 2014, the World Health Assembly, of the World Health Organization (WHO), unanimously adopted a palliative care (PC) resolution, which outlines clear recommendations to the United Nations member states, such as including PC in national health policies and in the undergraduate curricula for health care professionals, and highlights the critical need for countries to ensure that there is an adequate supply of essential PC medicines, especially those needed to alleviate pain. This resolution also carries great challenges: Every year over 20 million patients (of which 6% are children) need PC at the end of life (EOL). However, in 2011, approximately three million patients received PC, and only one in ten people in need is currently receiving it. We describe this public health situation and systems failure, the history and evolution of PC, and the components of the WHO public health model. We propose a role for public health for PC integration in community settings to advance PC and relieve suffering in the world.

Nurse-led follow-up at home vs. conventional medical outpatient clinic follow-up in patients with incurable upper gastrointestinal cancer: a randomized study

CONTEXT

Upper gastrointestinal cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. The multidimensional problems of incurable patients require close monitoring and frequent support, which cannot sufficiently be provided during conventional one to two month follow-up visits to the outpatient clinic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare nurse-led follow-up at home with conventional medical follow-up in the outpatient clinic for patients with incurable primary or recurrent esophageal, pancreatic, or hepatobiliary cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to nurse-led follow-up at home or conventional medical follow-up in the outpatient clinic. Outcome parameters were quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction, and health care consumption, measured by different questionnaires at one and a half and four months after randomization. As well, cost analyses were done for both follow-up strategies in the first four months.

RESULTS

In total, 138 patients were randomized, of which 66 (48%) were evaluable. At baseline, both groups were similar with respect to clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and health-related QoL. Patients in the nurse-led follow-up group were significantly more satisfied with the visits, whereas QoL and health care consumption within the first four months were comparable between the two groups. Nurse-led follow-up was less expensive than conventional medical follow-up. However, the total costs for the first four months of follow-up in this study were higher in the nurse-led follow-up group because of a higher frequency of visits.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that conventional medical follow-up is interchangeable with nurse-led follow-up. A cost utility study is necessary to determine the preferred frequency and duration of the home visits.

'Best practice' in developing and evaluating palliative and end-of-life care services: a meta-synthesis of research methods for the MORECare project

BACKGROUND

Improved and cost-effective palliative and end-of-life care is an international policy imperative. Developments are impeded by a weak and often inconsistent evidence base.

AIM

To examine the main methodological challenges and limitations to developing and evaluating palliative and end-of-life care services and requirements to further this field of research.

DESIGN

A meta-synthesis to systematically appraise the evidence from systematic reviews on the research methods used in studies evaluating the effectiveness of palliative care services for patients with advanced illness and/or carers meeting inclusion and quality criteria. We extracted data from the reviews on the methodological issues reported on the included studies into Excel spreadsheets and generated textual descriptions coded and analysed in NVivo.

DATA SOURCES

Six electronic databases, reference chaining and expert advice.

RESULTS

In total, 27 systematic reviews were included on the effectiveness of palliative care services for patients with cancer (n = 6), advanced illness (n = 10) or mixed populations (n = 11) across care settings. Main methodological challenges were implementation as a continuum, active precise recruitment, addressing randomisation and economic evaluation beyond cost savings.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of delivering and evaluating palliative and end-of-life care services requires the accumulation of knowledge from multiple sources to understand the active components of an intervention to deliver patient benefit and examine the evaluation methods to detect change and reveal processes prior to a definitive trial. The implementation of evidence into practice should form a continuum throughout the evaluation stages to reveal understanding on the process of intervention delivery, the context and the intended outcome(s).

A literature review of randomized controlled trials of the organization of care at the end of life

We searched nine electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about care at the end of life and found 23 RCTs. We assessed their quality using the criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. The RCTs researched three themes: (a) the effect of providing palliative care through dedicated community teams on quality of life, on the management of symptoms, on satisfaction with care, on the duration of the palliative period, and on place of death; (b) the effects of specific palliative care interventions-advanced planning of care for the end of life, patient-held records, providing quality-of-life data to patients and physicians, grief education for relatives, palliative care education for nurses, and palliative care for patients with dementia; and (c) the costs of palliative compared to conventional care. We identify difficulties in conducting research on palliative care and solutions and discuss future possible research themes.

Effectiveness of palliative care services in symptom control of patients with advanced terminal cancer: a spanish, multicenter, prospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post study

CONTEXT

In implementing the National Strategy of Palliative Care in Spain, there needs to be an evaluation of services, especially of their effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction of patients and families.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palliative care services (PCS) in improving symptom control in Spain.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, quasi-experimental, pre-post intervention study evaluated symptoms, such as pain, breakthrough pain, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, insomnia, dyspnea at rest and with movement, anxiety, and depression, using patient-reported numeric rating scales on Days 0, 7, and 14 after referral to a PCS.

RESULTS

Of the 318 PCSs included in the National Directory for 2004, 105 services in the 17 autonomous regions of Spain were able to report 265 eligible (treatment-naïve) patients. Nonparticipation by some centers was because of excessive workload or because their patients were not treatment-naïve. Median survival was 42 days. Pain severity and number of crises of breakthrough pain significantly improved, as did other indicators of patient satisfaction. Symptom improvement was independent of type of service (in acute bed hospitals, medium-term stay facilities, hospital support teams, home care support teams, and outpatient clinics).

CONCLUSION

Our national plan appears to be successful in reducing symptoms irrespective of the type of organization providing the PCS. An area for improvement could be to lessen the workload of individual teams.

Changes in medical and nursing care after admission to palliative care units: a potential method for improving regional palliative care

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate changes in medical and nursing care for patients just after admission to a palliative care unit (PCU) from general wards in one city.

METHODS

Subjects were 260 consecutive patients admitted to a PCU. Data on changes in medical and nursing care occurring just after admission were collected prospectively using a structured data collection sheet about four areas: (1) medical treatment, (2) nursing care, (3) giving additional information about the patient's condition to the patient and/or the family, and (4) obtaining psychosocial information.

RESULTS

The mean number of total changes was 8.0 +/- 5.6 per patient. The most common changes in medical treatment were initiation or increase of opioids (18%), discontinuation or decrease in artificial hydration (16%), initiation of steroids (13%), initiation of antiemetics (9%), initiation of antibiotics (8%), and initiation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7%). The most common changes in nursing care were starting oral care (19%), permission to take a bath (11%), and change in the pattern of meals (8%). Information about the patient's condition was given most frequently to key family members (27%). Psychosocial information obtained most frequently was about the family's expectations regarding the PCU and insight into the patient's condition (53% and 41%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in medical and nursing care were frequent, and the frequency of local healthcare providers' assessment of the changes may be insufficient. Providing general ward staff with data about changes in interventions occurring just after PCU admission might be effective for improving palliative care for terminal patients.

The National Tumor Association Foundation (ANT): A 30 year old model of home palliative care

BACKGROUND

Models of palliative care delivery develop within a social, cultural, and political context. This paper describes the 30-year history of the National Tumor Association (ANT), a palliative care organization founded in the Italian province of Bologna, focusing on this model of home care for palliative cancer patients and on its evaluation.

METHODS

Data were collected from the 1986-2008 ANT archives and documents from the Emilia-Romagna Region Health Department, Italy. Outcomes of interest were changed in: number of patients served, performance status at admission (Karnofsky Performance Status score [KPS]), length of participation in the program (days of care provided), place of death (home vs. hospital/hospice), and satisfaction with care. Statistical methods included linear and quadratic regressions. A linear and a quadratic regressions were generated; the independent variable was the year, while the dependent one was the number of patients from 1986 to 2008. Two linear regressions were generated for patients died at home and in the hospital, respectively. For each regression, the R square, the unstandardized and standardized coefficients and related P-values were estimated.

RESULTS

The number of patients served by ANT has increased continuously from 131 (1986) to a cumulative total of 69,336 patients (2008), at a steady rate of approximately 121 additional patients per year and with no significant gender difference. The annual number of home visits increased from 6,357 (1985) to 904,782 (2008). More ANT patients died at home than in hospice or hospital; this proportion increased from 60% (1987) to 80% (2007). The rate of growth in the number of patients dying in hospital/hospice was approximately 40 patients/year (p < 0.01), vs. approximately 177 patients/year for patients who died at home. The percentage of patients with KPS < 40 at admission decreased from 70% (2003) to 30% (2008); the percentage of patients with KPS > 40 increased. Mean days of care for patients with KPS > 40 exceeded mean days for patients with KPS < 40 (p < 0.001). Patients and caregivers reported high satisfaction with care in each year of assessment; in 2008, among 187 interviewed caregivers, 95% judged the quality of doctors' assistance, and 91% judged the quality of nurses' assistance, to be "optimal."

CONCLUSIONS

The ANT home care model of palliative care delivery has been well-received, with progressively growing numbers of patients served. It has resulted in a greater proportion of home deaths and in patients' accessing palliative care at an earlier point in the disease trajectory. Changes in ANT chronicle palliative care trends in general.

Significant improvement in quality of life of patients with incurable cancer after designation to a palliative homecare team

The aims of this study were to describe and compare quality of life before and after designation to a palliative homecare team in patients with different cancer diagnoses and to identify pre-designation predictors of post-designation global quality of life. We measured patients' quality of life 1 week before designation and 11 days (median time) after with the Assessment of Quality of life at the End of Life (Axelsson & Sjödén 1999). Of 163 eligible patients 63 participated without attrition. Patients' quality of life improved in the physical, psychological, medical and global areas. Six items significantly improved: hours recumbent during the day (P = 0.009), nausea (P = 0.008), anxiety (P = 0.007), getting hold of staff (P = 0.000), received care (P = 0.003) and global quality of life (P = 0.023). Depression/low in mood (r = 0.55) and meaningfulness (r = 0.70) associated to global quality of life. Furthermore, pain (P = 0.028) and meaningfulness (P = 0.028) predicted global quality of life. In the existential area, it is important to further explore how meaningfulness is associated to and predicts global quality of life.

A systematic review of specialised palliative care for terminal patients: which model is better?

There is evidence of improved effectiveness of specialised palliative care for terminally ill patients in comparison to conventional care. However, there is uncertainty about which model is better. The objective of this systematic review was to identify studies that compare specialised palliative care models between them assessing their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. We searched studies published between 2003 and 2006 in several electronic databases and updated the search in MEDLINE up to 2008. Papers published before 2003 were identified by means of previous systematic reviews and manual search. Studies with broad designs comparing two or more specialised palliative care programmes in adults with terminal illness were selected. Six systematic reviews, three studies on effectiveness and one cost study were included. All systematic reviews drew the conclusion that specialised palliative care is more effective than conventional care. The methodological limitations of the original studies and the heterogeneity of programmes did not allow to draw conclusions about whether a specific model of specialised palliative care is more or less effective or cost-effective than other.

Clinical and financial analysis of an acute palliative care unit in an oncological department

The aim of this article is to describe the clinical activity and medical intervention of an acute model of palliative care unit (APC), as well as the reimbursement procedures and economic viability. A sample of 504 patients admitted at an APC in 1 year was surveyed. Indications for admission, pain and symptom intensity, analgesic treatments, procedures, instrumental examinations and modalities of discharge were recorded. For each patient, tariff for reimbursement was calculated according to the existent disease related grouping (DRG) system. The mean age was 62 years, and 246 patients were males. The mean hospital stay was 5.4 days. Pain control was the most frequent indication for admission. All patients had laboratory tests and several instrumental examinations. Almost all patients were prescribed one or more opioids at significant doses, and different routes of administration, as well as medication as needed. 59 patients received blood cell transfusions and 34 interventional procedures. Only 40 patients died in the unit, 11 of them being sedated at the end of life. Treatment efficacy was considered optimal and mild in 264 and 226 patients respectively. A mean of 3019 euros for admission was reimbursed by the Health Care System. APCs are of paramount importance within an oncological department, as they provide effective and intensive treatments during the entire course of disease, providing a simultaneous and integrated approach. Our findings also suggest both a cost and quality incentive for oncological departments to develop APC.

Impact of an inpatient palliative care team: a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Palliative care improves care and reduces costs for hospitalized patients with life-limiting illnesses. There have been no multicenter randomized trials examining impact on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and subsequent health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

Measure the impact of an interdisciplinary palliative care service (IPCS) on patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and cost of care for 6 months posthospital discharge.

METHODS

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. IPCS provided consultative, interdisciplinary, palliative care to intervention patients. Controls received usual hospital care (UC).

SETTING AND SAMPLE

Five hundred seventeen patients with life-limiting illnesses from a hospital in Denver, Portland, and San Francisco enrolled June 2002 to December 2003.

MEASURES

Modified City of Hope Patient Questionnaire, total health care costs, hospice utilization, and survival.

RESULTS

IPCS reported higher scores for the Care Experience scale (IPCS: 6.9 versus UC: 6.6, p = 0.04) and for the Doctors, Nurses/Other Care Providers Communication scale (IPCS: 8.3 versus UC: 7.5, p = 0.0004). IPCS patients had fewer intensive care admissions (ICU) on hospital readmission (12 versus 21, p = 0.04), and lower 6-month net cost savings of $4,855 per patient (p = 0.001). IPCS had longer median hospice stays (24 days versus 12 days, p = 0.04). There were no differences in survival or symptom control.

CONCLUSIONS

IPCS patients reported greater satisfaction with their care experience and providers' communication, had fewer ICU admissions on readmission, and lower total health care costs following hospital discharge.

A method to determine spatial access to specialized palliative care services using GIS

Background

Providing palliative care is a growing priority for health service administrators worldwide as the populations of many nations continue to age rapidly. In many countries, palliative care services are presently inadequate and this problem will be exacerbated in the coming years. The provision of palliative care, moreover, has been piecemeal in many jurisdictions and there is little distinction made at present between levels of service provision. There is a pressing need to determine which populations do not enjoy access to specialized palliative care services in particular.

Methods

Catchments around existing specialized palliative care services in the Canadian province of British Columbia were calculated based on real road travel time. Census block face population counts were linked to postal codes associated with road segments in order to determine the percentage of the total population more than one hour road travel time from specialized palliative care.

Results

Whilst 81% of the province's population resides within one hour from at least one specialized palliative care service, spatial access varies greatly by regional health authority. Based on the definition of specialized palliative care adopted for the study, the Northern Health Authority has, for instance, just two such service locations, and well over half of its population do not have reasonable spatial access to such care.

Conclusion

Strategic location analysis methods must be developed and used to accurately locate future palliative services in order to provide spatial access to the greatest number of people, and to ensure that limited health resources are allocated wisely. Improved spatial access has the potential to reduce travel-times for patients, for palliative care workers making home visits, and for travelling practitioners. These methods are particularly useful for health service planners – and provide a means to rationalize their decision-making. Moreover, they are extendable to a number of health service allocation problems.

Perceptual consistency of pain and quality of life between hospice cancer patients and family caregivers: a pilot study

AIMS

Clinicians usually adjust medical management based on caregivers' observation when caring for seriously ill or cognitive-impaired patients. The purpose of this study is to research the differences in perceptual congruence of patients and caregivers when assessing patients' global pain (GP) and quality of life (QOL) in a hospice ward.

METHODS

From July 2002 to June 2004, hospice inpatients and their family caregivers were invited to participate in this study at a medical centre in Southern Taiwan. The survey was cross-sectional, incorporating patients' bio-psycho-social factors so as to understand their impacts on patients' pain perception and QOL. The bio-psycho-social factors included biological pain, physical dependence, financial difficulty, anxiety over family, existential meaning of life, uncontrolled outcome of disease and insufficient emotional support.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patient/caregiver dyads were recruited in the study. The mean of patients' self-reported GP was higher than caregivers' rating (5.9 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.1 +/- 1.9, p < 0.05); however, the score of patients' QOL was lower in the patients than in the caregivers (6.9 +/- 1.6 vs. 7.9 +/- 1.4, p < 0.001). The result of regression analyses showed that 'biological pain', 'religion' and 'gender' were independent variables for patients' GP; however, 'biological pain' and 'gender' were factors for patients' QOL. No psychosocial factor was revealed as a factor in patient's perception of GP or QOL in this survey.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that caregivers have the propensity to under-rate patients' pain and overvalue QOL; moreover, 'religion' and 'gender' influence patients' perception near the end-of-life. Therefore, reassessment and proper holistic approach are important in hospice care.

Quality of life in palliative care cancer patients: a literature review

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

[corrected] This review of the literature intended to get insight into the international standards of quality of life assessment in palliative care, the conceptual and research literature addressing illness related quality of life and an examination of how nurse researchers define and assess this concept in the context of terminally ill cancer patients. Clearly stated goals for measuring quality of life as well as an understanding of the pragmatic and theoretical explanations for current trends in quality of life measurement are fundamental to this focus.

BACKGROUND

Most clinicians and researchers agree that the primary goal of palliative care is to optimize the quality of life of patients with advanced incurable diseases through control of physical symptoms and attention to the patient's psychological, social and spiritual needs. Palliative care therefore is the achievement of the best quality of life for patients and their families. Consequently, the outcomes of care should be measured in terms of the extent to which this goal is achieved. Quality of life is difficult to define and measure; it is a multidimensional, dynamic and subjective concept. During the past decade, multidisciplinary research measuring the impact of cancer and its treatment on the quality of people's lives escalated rapidly in international literature but not in the German speaking European countries. This international escalation was accompanied by a proliferation of measurement strategies and tools. Nursing shared this interest and began to generate substantive research of the phenomenon. In the oncology and palliative care nursing societies quality of life and numerous closely related areas of symptom management rank among the highest research priorities.

METHOD

This paper examines nursing literature published between 1990 and 2004, retrieved through a computer review of MEDLINE and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature. The review includes reports that systematically describe or measure the quality of life of people with a terminal cancer in palliative care as a variable of interest. This article also describes conceptual and operational definitions of quality of life and explores the implicit and explicit goals of research.

RESULTS

Quality of life is a concept relevant to the discipline of nursing. Nurses, especially oncology and palliative care nurses, actively contributed to the development of the quality of life concept through instrument development and population description.

CONCLUSION

Nurses working in German palliative care settings do change the quality of life of patients they care for, but there are no systematic standards of assessing these outcomes.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

There are challenges related to measuring quality of life in patient-focused palliative care and research. Systematic quality of life assessment in all palliative care settings will establish quality assurance and the further development of this very young discipline in Germany.

Resource consumption and costs of palliative care services in Spain: a multicenter prospective study

Patients (n=395) with terminal-stage cancer receiving attention from palliative care services (PCSs) were recruited over a period of 15 consecutive days from 171 participating PCS units. Resource consumption and costs were evaluated for 16 weeks of follow-up, and the findings were compared with a study conducted in 1992 so as to assess change over time. The most frequent health care interventions were homecare visits, hospital admissions, and patient-consultant phone calls. PCS provided 67% of all services and consultation interventions in 91% of patients. Compared with the historical data, there was a significant shift from the use of conventional hospital beds toward palliative care beds, a reduced hospital stay (25.5-19.2 days; P=0.002), an increase in the death-at-home option (31%-42%), a lower use of hospital emergency rooms (52%-30.6%; P=0.001), and an increase in programmed care. Compared to the previous resource consumption and expenditure study in 1992, the current PCS policy implies a cost saving of 61%, with greater efficiency and no compromise of patient care.

Expectations to and evaluation of a palliative home-care team as seen by patients and carers

OBJECTIVES

Although the number of palliative home-care teams is increasing, knowledge of what patients and principal informal carers expect from a home-care team is sparse. We aimed to elucidate this as well as evaluate a home-care team.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews with nine patients and six carers before receiving home care and 2-4 weeks after. In total, 26 interviews were conducted. Interviews were analysed with Template Analysis. Peer debriefing was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients and carers expected the team members to have specialised knowledge in palliative care and to improve their sense of security being at home. They also expected respite for carers and activities for patients. They evaluated the team positively but missed respite for carers and 24-h on-call service.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and carers found the home-care team essential to their sense of security being at home. Primary health care professionals must receive any necessary training outside patients' homes. Offering respite for carers and 24-h on-call service would be an improvement.

Impacting Quality of Life for Patients With Advanced Cancer With a Structured Multidisciplinary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a structured, multidisciplinary intervention targeted to maintain the overall quality of life (QOL), which is more comprehensive than psychosocial distress, of patients undergoing radiation therapy for advanced-stage cancer.

Patients and Methods

Radiation therapy patients with advanced cancer and an estimated 5-year survival rate of 0% to 50% were randomly assigned to either an eight-session structured multidisciplinary intervention arm or a standard care arm. The eight 90-minute sessions addressed the five domains of QOL including cognitive, physical, emotional, spiritual, and social functioning. The primary end point of maintaining overall QOL was assessed by a single-item linear analog scale (Linear Analog Scale of Assessment or modified Spitzer Uniscale). QOL was assessed at baseline, week 4 (end of multidisciplinary intervention), week 8, and week 27.

Results

Of the 103 participants, overall QOL at week 4 was maintained by the patients in the intervention (n = 49), whereas QOL at week 4 significantly decreased for patients in the control group (n = 54). This change reflected a 3-point increase from baseline in the intervention group and a 9-point decrease from baseline in the control group (P = .009). Intervention participants maintained their QOL, and controls gradually returned to baseline by the end of the 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

Although intervention participants maintained and actually improved their QOL during radiation therapy, control participants experienced a significant decrease in their QOL. Thus, a structured multidisciplinary intervention can help maintain or even improve QOL in patients with advanced cancer who are undergoing cancer treatment.

End-of-Life Care: Lessons from Other Nations

Palliative care and hospice services have evolved across the globe in different contexts and in different ways, although many of the challenges faced are similar. Comparison between countries helps to identify the best solutions for individual patients and their families, who have complex needs and problems. This paper describes the globally shared challenges and beginnings in hospice and palliative care. It reviews evolution of services and approaches. It compares the models of hospice and palliative care in the United States and the United Kingdom, where pioneer hospices were developed through the work of Dame Cicely Saunders, and then seeks to highlight ways to learn from the different approaches to address common questions. Several research recommendations result from this review. In many countries the research agenda in palliative and end-of-life care must move from describing need (where there are ample studies) to understanding how and determining whether services and interventions work, for whom, and when. Studies should consider the whole trajectory of illness, particularly in slowly progressive or relapsing conditions (including neurological conditions). Future studies should work toward the use of a similar set of core outcome measures, as well as take advantage of the opportunity to undertake "natural experiments" by comparing and contrasting care systems developed in different contexts around the world.

Assessing quality of end-of-life hospital care in a southern European regional health service

Objectives:During the final period of life, patients with cancer in the Basque Country are given treatment in different types of hospital care. This study compared the quality of care according to the type of care in one of the autonomous communities in Spain.

Methods:A retrospective study was carried out of cancer patients who died in conventional hospital services, home hospitalization services, and palliative care units. In addition to hospital stay and readmission number, variables based on the recommendations of Spanish Society for Palliative Care were studied.

Results:End-of-life was diagnosed in 57 percent of a sample of 486 patients, 3 days before death (median). The use of symptom control scales was only documented in the clinical records of eight patients. Sociofamily evaluation was not found. Patients in conventional hospital services were less frequently diagnosed with end-of-life and agony and were significantly different from the rest in the reasons for admission, symptoms assessed, drugs used, administration routes, and dosage forms. Pain was evaluated in 50 percent of the patients and was better controlled in palliative care units. Patients not diagnosed with agony (52 percent) were more frequently not given specific treatment.

Conclusions:End-of-life in cancer patients was diagnosed too late. The quality of care in palliative care units and by home hospitalization service was better than that in conventional hospitalization. Nevertheless, there were areas for improvement in the three modalities of care.

Using Evidence in Home Care: The Value of a Librarian-Clinician Collaboration—the Clinician’s Role

Evidence-based practice is a natural process for the inquiring home care nurse who wants to provide the highest quality of care. A critical step in the process is finding the best evidence and employing appropriate expertise and resources to facilitate the search. This critical step can be more easily accomplished with a collaborative partnership involving a reference librarian and the clinician. In this process, each uses his or her unique expertise to search for the best evidence to support practice decisions. Examples are given of current relevant evidence for health care clinicians and suggestions for how to use the evidence in decision making.

Public health and palliative care

Public health is the science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting health through organized efforts of society. There are many reasons why palliative care is now a significant public health issue. Death follows a period of chronic or progressing illness, where symptom control and support are needed. This has a significant effect on our health care resources; 10% to 12% of total health care costs are spent on the end of life. Across the globe, populations are aging, such that by 2020 in many countries almost 1 in 3 people will be aged 65 years or more. After reaching the age of 65, people now live an average of another 12 to 22 years. Cost-effective ways to provide care are needed, and public health has a role in ensuring equity of access to effective care and prevention of suffering and problems during bereavement.

Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals

OBJECTIVES

To determine the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, informal carers and health and social care professionals involved in their care in primary and secondary care settings.

DATA SOURCES

Eleven electronic databases (medical, health-related and social science) were searched from the beginning of 1997 to October 2003. Palliative Medicine (January 1997-October 2003) was also hand-searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Systematic search for studies, reports and policy papers written in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

Included papers were data-extracted and the quality of each included study was assessed using 10 questions on a 40-point scale.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 9921 hits. Two hundred and seven papers were directly concerned with symptoms or issues of access, referral or barriers and obstacles to receiving palliative care. Only 40 (19%) papers met the inclusion criteria. Several barriers to access and referral to palliative care were identified including lack of knowledge and education amongst health and social care professionals, and a lack of standardized referral criteria. Some groups of people failed to receive timely referrals e.g., those from minority ethnic communities, older people and patients with nonmalignant conditions as well as people that are socially excluded e.g., homeless people.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to improve education and knowledge about specialist palliative care and hospice care amongst health and social care professionals, patients and carers. Standardized referral criteria need to be developed. Further work is also needed to assess the needs of those not currently accessing palliative care services.

Advanced Palliative Home Care: Next-of-Kin's Perspective

GOALS

(1). To describe what aspects are important when next-of-kin evaluate advanced palliative home care (APHC) and (2). to compare the expressed aspects and describe eventual differences among the three settings, which differed in terms of length of services, geographic location, and population size.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Four to 7 months after the patient's death (87% from cancer), 217 consecutive next-of-kin from three different settings in Sweden responded (response rate 86%) to three open-ended questions via a postal questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Service aspects and comfort emerged as main categories. The staff's competence, attitude and communication, accessibility, and spectrum of services were valued service aspects. Comfort, such as feeling secure, was another important aspect and it concerned the next-of-kin themselves, the patients, and the families. Additionally, comfort was related to interactional issues such as being in the center and sharing caring with the staff. The actual place of care (i.e., being at home) added to the perceived comfort. Of the respondents, 87% described positive aspects of APHC and 28% negative aspects. No major differences were found among the different settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Next-of-kin incorporate service aspects and aspects relating to the patient's and family's comfort when evaluating APHC. The importance of these aspects is discussed in relation to the content of palliative care and potential goals.

Palliative day care: what does it cost to run a centre and does attendance affect use of other services?

AIM

To describe the cost of palliative day care (PDC), assessing the value of all resources whether paid for or not. To examine different patterns of resource use resulting from attending PDC.

METHODS

Five PDC centres in southern England provided detailed cost and resource use data, both paid and unpaid for. The PDC group were consecutive new referrals to a PDC centre who were well enough to be interviewed. The comparison group were recruited from home care teams. Data were collected at baseline, six to eight weeks and 12-15 weeks, on health and social care utilization in the month prior to interview. Data were divided into cohorts based on time from first interview to death and analysed separately.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Annual cost of running a day care centre, and cost per patient per day. Use of all health and social care resources over time, stratified by time from death. Comparison of health and social care by stage of illness, and by PDC attendance.

RESULTS

PDC cost around pound 54 per person per day in 1999, rising to pound 75 including unpaid resources. 145 patients had data on health and social care use. The patterns of care showed that, overall, patients accessed few services other than PDC. Comparison group patients did not access similar services elsewhere. PDC might substitute home nursing and GP care for patients who attend PDC at least three months before death but this data is not conclusive. Inpatient care was negligible for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A full economic evaluation could not be undertaken without robust evidence of the effectiveness of PDC. PDC centres made use of resources that were not paid for and shared resources with inpatient units, reducing costs. Service use was different for patients who attended compared with patients who did not. Similar services were not accessed elsewhere in the community; PDC does not appear to replicate other services for this group of patients.

Negotiating palliative care expertise in the medical world

This paper explores the relationship between palliative medicine and the wider medical world. It draws on data from a focus group study in which doctors from a range of specialties talked about developing palliative care for patients with heart failure. In outlining views of the organisation of care, participants engaged in a process of negotiation about the roles and expertise of their own, and other, specialties. Our analysis considers the expertise of palliative medicine with reference to its technical and indeterminate components. It shows how these are used to promote and challenge boundaries between medical specialties and with nursing. The boundaries constructed on palliative medicine's technical contribution to care are regarded as particularly coherent within orthodox medicine. In contrast, its indeterminate expertise, represented by the 'holistic' and 'psychosocial' agendas, is potentially compromising in a medical world that prizes science and rationality. We show how the coherence of both kinds of expertise is contested by moves to extend palliative care beyond its traditional temporal (end-of-life) and pathological (cancer) fields of practice.

Is there evidence that palliative care teams alter end-of-life experiences of patients and their caregivers?

Palliative care provision varies widely, and the effectiveness of palliative and hospice care teams (PCHCT) is unproven. To determine the effect of PCHCT, 10 electronic databases (to 2000), 4 relevant journals, associated reference lists, and the grey literature were searched. All PCHCT evaluations were included. Anecdotal and case reports were excluded. Forty-four studies evaluated PCHCT provision. Teams were home care (22), hospital-based (9), combined home/hospital care (4), inpatient units (3), and integrated teams (6). Studies were mostly Grade II or III quality. Funnel plots indicated slight publication bias. Meta-regression (26 studies) found slight positive effect, of approximately 0.1, of PCHCTs on patient outcomes, independent of team make-up, patient diagnosis, country, or study design. Meta-analysis (19 studies) demonstrated small benefit on patients' pain (odds ratio [OR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.64), other symptoms (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.30-0.88), and a non-significant trend towards benefits for satisfaction, and therapeutic interventions. Data regarding home deaths were equivocal. Meta-synthesis (all studies) found wide variations in the type of service delivered by each team; there was no discernible difference in outcomes between city, urban, and rural areas. Evidence of benefit was strongest for home care. Only one study provided full economic cost-benefit evaluation. This is the first study to quantitatively demonstrate benefit from PCHCTs. Such comparisons were limited by the quality of the research.

Quality of life in palliative care: principles and practice

In healthcare, most researchers and clinicians agree that quality of life (QOL) is related to symptoms, functioning, psychological and social wellbeing, and probably to a lesser extent to meaning and fulfillment. This multidimensional health-oriented concept has been named health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, during end-of-life care spirituality and existential issues become more prominent, as well as family members' perception of quality of care. Outcome measures in palliative care require constructs that reflect the specific goals of palliative care, such as improving QOL before death, symptom control, family support and satisfaction, as well as patients' perceptions of 'purpose' and 'meaning of life'. It is generally recommended that internationally developed and validated patient-rated multidimensional questionnaires should be used when assessing HRQOL in research. However, 'multidimensionality', with often more than 10 possible outcomes, is a threat both to statistical analysis and clinical interpretation of data. Preferentially, a more limited number of outcomes based upon the research question(s) should be defined prior to data collection in the study protocol. The researcher needs to carefully evaluate the content of the questionnaire, in addition to other properties, such as the validity and reliability, before the final decision is made with regards to which instrument to use in a given study.

Use of quality-of-life scores in care planning in a hospice setting: a comparative study

This study examined the concept and measurement of quality of life (QOL) in terminally ill patients. It also addressed how patients' QOL can be improved within a hospice setting. Measurement of QOL was used in developing patient-care plans and to identify differences in QOL assessment between nurse and patient as an aid to reflective practice. The findings of the study revealed that a better understanding of the patient can be achieved if nurses have access to the patient's QOL perspective. This better understanding, when translated into meeting patients' QOL priorities and needs, resulted in clinically significant improvements in their QOL. Reflective practice by nurses was also shown. A second article will discuss how the theme 'revelation' emerged from the insights of those involved in the study.

Advanced home care for cancer patients at the end of life: a qualitative study of hopes and expectations of family caregivers

It is increasingly common that cancer patients are cared for at home at the end of life, with help from advanced home care teams. This may have positive implications for cancer patients and their families, but it may also be burdensome to the family caregivers with implications for their health and well-being. This qualitative study was therefore initiated to prospectively explore how family caregivers reason about their expectations of providing end-of-life care at home for relatives with cancer, enrolled in advanced palliative home care units. Ten interviews were conducted with 11 family caregivers at enrollment to the home care unit. A form of constant comparative analysis was used to generate two main themes from the data. One theme concerned the role transition into becoming a family caregiver, whereas the other theme relates to the transition to a new life situation of the caregiver (him/herself). The family caregivers describe themselves as the persons primarily bearing responsibility and providing care for their dying relatives. They were found to have many concerns about their own situation, especially in regard to issues temporally after the death of the patient, but seemed to have few expected sources of support related to these concerns. Professional support is described as expected primarily for care-related tasks, although hopes may be expressed about support in other areas. The distinction between resources described as existing in theory and those used in practice also are apparent in analysis of the interviews. If home care is to be a positive alternative to hospital care, individual expectations should be considered when planning supportive care.

Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients

This study evaluated two quality-of-life assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index and the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire, within palliative care nursing. Primarily tested was the feasibility of the tools to assess clients' QOL at admission and, if necessary, when their condition altered. The reliability of the tools has previously been ascertained Additionally, quality of dying during the last two days of life for 14 participants who died during the study was assessed and measured retrospectively by these tools, using the client's nominated caregiver as proxy for the client. It is this second focus that we report on here. The reasons why proxy assessment and measurement of client QOD was not useful or feasible are discussed.

Palliative care in district general hospitals: the nurse's perspective

Most patients with a terminal illness die in hospital, yet the opinions of their prime carers are largely ignored. This study investigated registered nurses' perceptions of palliative care in district general hospitals. A random sample of 263 nurses was surveyed, using a pre-piloted questionnaire, and results showed that 70% of general ward nurses believe that managing care of the dying is an integral part of hospital care. However, their dissatisfaction with the care they give is reflected in the mere 8% who consider hospital an ideal setting for patients who are dying. Although nurses are confident in their physical/clinical role, dealing with psychosocial issues is more problematic. A minority feel confident in discussing death and dying with the patient. Barriers to optical palliative care on general wards were perceived as lack of appropriate education and training, work pressures, and lack of support from medical colleagues and managers.

Quality-of-life assessment in palliative care

Success in oncology has traditionally been measured in terms of cure, survival, and tumour response. However, more recently, health-related quality of life has emerged as an important outcome, particularly in the palliation setting. We review published randomised studies from two areas in palliation: those assessing the effectiveness of palliative care programmes and those looking at the effects of palliative chemotherapy compared with best supportive care. In the latter studies, there was an improvement in research methods between the late 1980s and 2000, owing to the use of standardised instruments, specification of endpoints, and improvements in data presentation and interpretation. A range of health-related quality-of-life instruments were used in the studies, which makes comparisons difficult. This was particularly true of the palliative-care programmes. Attrition due to the death of patients in the study groups was also a problem and needs to be taken into account in study planning and design, as well as in data collection. A common standard for scoring health-related quality of life measurements both within and between instruments would improve the interpretation of findings and their clinical application, thereby giving them greater effect on clinical decision-making.

Quality of life issues identified by palliative care clients using two tools

Reported are issues impacting upon the Quality of Life (QoL) of 59 palliative care clients within a district nursing service. These issues reinforce the emerging conceptualisation of QoL as being subjective and multidimensional. The issues were identified during a trial of two QoL assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index (CGI) and the McGill Quality of Life (MQOL). In this era of considerable concern about QoL for the terminally ill, the article's intent is to present the QoL issues identfied, the grades of impact and priority for improvement of the issues according to the clients, and to discuss these aspects. This information can inform the assessment of palliative care clients (the CGI tool was found ideal for such an assessment), and may also inform further research on the QoL of palliative care clients.

Quality of life in advanced cancer patients: the impact of sociodemographic and medical characteristics

Population-based surveys have shown that health-related quality of life (HRQL) is influenced by patients' characteristics such as age, gender, living situation and diagnoses. The present study explores the impact of such factors on the HRQL of severely ill cancer patients. The study sample included 395 cancer patients who participated in a cluster randomised trial of palliative care. Median survival was 13 weeks. HRQL assessments (using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were compared among subgroups of relevant patients' characteristics (ANOVA), and the significance of individual covariates was explored by multivariate linear regression. Most EORTC QLQ-C30 scores showed minor differences between genders. Higher age was associated with less sleeping disturbance, less pain and better emotional functioning. No positive impact of living with a partner was found. Performance status and/or time from assessment to death were significantly associated with most functioning and symptom scores. We concluded that although the overall impact of sociodemographic characteristics may seem less important to HRQL scores among advanced cancer patients than in general populations, age and gender should be allowed for. Performance status and closeness to death also need to be reported.

'The real stuff': implications for nursing of assessing and measuring a terminally ill person's quality of life

Two quality of life (QoL) assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index (CGI) and the McGill Quality of Life (MQOL) questionnaires, were trialled within district nursing palliative care to test usefulness and feasibility for holistic intervention selection, individualized palliative care planning, and measurement of the quality of dying. The specific focus of this paper is to discuss the less tangible outcomes of the trial, which illuminate the partly 'hidden' value and nature of clinical nursing. These outcomes include awareness that the use of such tools may: by actual administration of the tool be, in and of itself, a therapeutic nursing action; focus on 'the real stuff from the client's perspective, that which matters most to the terminally ill client, but may not be classically considered as prompting nursing intervention; and facilitate 'the real stuff' of nursing, perhaps known but not usually articulated by nurses, and which usually does not feature on care plans nor in time allocation schedules.