Methotrexate therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous Manifestations of "Lupus": Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Beyond

Lupus, Latin for "wolf," is a term used to describe many dermatologic conditions, some of which are related to underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, while others are distinct disease processes. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a wide array of visible skin manifestations and can progress to systemic lupus erythematosus in some cases. Cutaneous lupus can be subdivided into three main categories: acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Physical exam, laboratory studies, and histopathology enable differentiation of cutaneous lupus subtypes. This differentiation is paramount as the subtype of cutaneous lupus informs upon treatment, disease monitoring, and prognostication. This review outlines the different cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and provides an update on both topical and systemic treatment options for these patients. Other conditions that utilize the term "lupus" but are not cutaneous lupus erythematosus are also discussed.

Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is common. Many interventions are used to treat SLE with varying efficacy, risks, and benefits.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for cutaneous disease in SLE.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to June 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Wiley Interscience Online Library, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saude (Virtual Health Library). We updated our search in September 2020, but these results have not yet been fully incorporated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for cutaneous disease in SLE compared with placebo, another intervention, no treatment, or different doses of the same intervention. We did not evaluate trials of cutaneous lupus in people without a diagnosis of SLE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were complete and partial clinical response. Secondary outcomes included reduction (or change) in number of clinical flares; and severe and minor adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-one RCTs, involving 11,232 participants, reported 43 different interventions. Trials predominantly included women from outpatient clinics; the mean age range of participants was 20 to 40 years. Twenty-five studies reported baseline severity, and 22 studies included participants with moderate to severe cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE); duration of CLE was not well reported. Studies were conducted mainly in multi-centre settings. Most often treatment duration was 12 months. Risk of bias was highest for the domain of reporting bias, followed by performance/detection bias. We identified too few studies for meta-analysis for most comparisons. We limited this abstract to main comparisons (all administered orally) and outcomes. We did not identify clinical trials of other commonly used treatments, such as topical corticosteroids, that reported complete or partial clinical response or numbers of clinical flares. Complete clinical response Studies comparing oral hydroxychloroquine against placebo did not report complete clinical response. Chloroquine may increase complete clinical response at 12 months' follow-up compared with placebo (absence of skin lesions) (risk ratio (RR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 2.61; 1 study, 24 participants; low-quality evidence). There may be little to no difference between methotrexate and chloroquine in complete clinical response (skin rash resolution) at 6 months' follow-up (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.50; 1 study, 25 participants; low-quality evidence). Methotrexate may be superior to placebo with regard to complete clinical response (absence of malar/discoid rash) at 6 months' follow-up (RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.63 to 7.84; 1 study, 41 participants; low-quality evidence). At 12 months' follow-up, there may be little to no difference between azathioprine and ciclosporin in complete clinical response (malar rash resolution) (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.52; 1 study, 89 participants; low-quality evidence). Partial clinical response Partial clinical response was reported for only one key comparison: hydroxychloroquine may increase partial clinical response at 12 months compared to placebo, but the 95% CI indicates that hydroxychloroquine may make no difference or may decrease response (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.41 to 120.16; 20 pregnant participants, 1 trial; low-quality evidence). Clinical flares Clinical flares were reported for only two key comparisons: hydroxychloroquine is probably superior to placebo at 6 months' follow-up for reducing clinical flares (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.89; 1 study, 47 participants; moderate-quality evidence). At 12 months' follow-up, there may be no difference between methotrexate and placebo, but the 95% CI indicates there may be more or fewer flares with methotrexate (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.83; 1 study, 86 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Adverse events Data for adverse events were limited and were inconsistently reported, but hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and methotrexate have well-documented adverse effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, liver problems, and retinopathy for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine and teratogenicity during pregnancy for methotrexate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the commonly-used treatment hydroxychloroquine, and there is also evidence supporting chloroquine and methotrexate for treating cutaneous disease in SLE. Evidence is limited due to the small number of studies reporting key outcomes. Evidence for most key outcomes was low or moderate quality, meaning findings should be interpreted with caution. Head-to-head intervention trials designed to detect differences in efficacy between treatments for specific CLE subtypes are needed. Thirteen further trials are awaiting classification and have not yet been incorporated in this review; they may alter the review conclusions.

Adverse Effects of Low-Dose Methotrexate: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) is the most commonly used drug for systemic rheumatic diseases worldwide and is the recommended first-line agent for rheumatoid arthritis. Despite extensive clinical use for more than 30 years, few data on adverse event (AE) rates derive from randomized, placebo-controlled trials, where both causality and magnitude of risk can be inferred.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate AE rates, risk, and risk differences comparing LD-MTX versus placebo.

DESIGN

Prespecified secondary analyses of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01594333).

SETTING

North America.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with known cardiovascular disease and diabetes or metabolic syndrome.

INTERVENTION

Random allocation to LD-MTX (≤20 mg/wk) or placebo. All participants received folic acid, 1 mg/d, 6 days per week.

MEASUREMENTS

Risks for specific AEs of interest, as well as for all AEs, were compared across treatment groups after blinded adjudication.

RESULTS

After an active run-in period, 6158 patients were enrolled and 4786 randomly assigned to a group; median follow-up was 23 months and median dosage 15 mg/wk. Among the randomly assigned participants, 81.2% were male, median age was 65.7 years, and median body mass index was 31.5 kg/m2. Of 2391 participants assigned to LD-MTX, 2080 (87.0%) had an AE of interest, compared with 1951 of 2395 (81.5%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.25]). The relative hazards of gastrointestinal (HR, 1.91 [CI, 1.75 to 2.10]), pulmonary (HR, 1.52 [CI, 1.16 to 1.98]), infectious (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.01 to 1.30]), and hematologic (HR, 1.15 [CI, 1.07 to 1.23]) AEs were elevated for LD-MTX versus placebo. With the exception of increased risk for skin cancer (HR, 2.05 [CI, 1.28 to 3.28]), the treatment groups did not differ in risk for other cancer or mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, or musculoskeletal AEs. Renal AEs were reduced in the LD-MTX group (HR, 0.85 [CI, 0.78 to 0.93]).

LIMITATION

The trial was done in patients without rheumatic disease who tolerated LD-MTX during an active run-in period.

CONCLUSION

Use of LD-MTX was associated with small to moderate elevations in risks for skin cancer and gastrointestinal, infectious, pulmonary, and hematologic AEs, whereas renal AEs were decreased.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Stress fractures in systemic lupus erythematosus after long-term MTX use successfully treated by MTX discontinuation and individualized bone-specific therapy

We report the case of a 64-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and recurrent bilateral stress fractures of the calcaneus due to long-term methotrexate (MTX) use. A detailed skeletal assessment pointed to osteoporomalacia with pronounced trabecular thinning and increased bone resorption. After years of unsuccessful treatment with bisphosphonates, a combined bone-specific denosumab-teriparatide treatment was initiated, and additional belimumab treatment was started to avoid intermittent steroid usage. As these measures did not lead to a significant improvement of the bone situation, MTX was eventually discontinued. This was followed by a rapid clinical improvement. In a follow-up MRI scan after 18 months, the stress fractures had almost disappeared. Furthermore, the bone density and microarchitecture markedly improved. In conclusion, this case demonstrates that MTX discontinuation/replacement in combination with an individualized and state-of-the-art bone-specific therapy is effective in SLE patients with stress fractures after long-term MTX use.

Efficacy and adverse reactions of methotrexate in the treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: A case series study

The application of methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of autoimmune diseases has been gradually increasing, but reports of MTX treatment for advanced ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) are extremely rare. This study investigated the efficacy and adverse reactions of low-dose MTX in patients with OCP.This was a retrospective, noncontrolled, case series study. Eleven patients diagnosed with advanced OCP (4 cases in stage III and 7 cases in stage IV) were enrolled. Treatment by oral administration of MTX (7.5 ± 2.5 mg) alone was performed. Visual acuity of the patients, conjunctival inflammation, cicatrization, ocular surface keratinization, and toxic side effects of drugs were evaluated.All patients enrolled in this study were females aged 32 to 83 years. Patients were followed up for 4 to 33 months. Low-dose MTX improved visual acuity of 3 cases (6 eyes, 27.3%). Conjunctival inflammation of 5 patients (10 eyes) rested after treatment, and conjunctival inflammation of 3 cases (6 eyes, 27.3%) was decreased with an effective rate of 72.7%. Cicatrices of 8 cases (15 eyes) showed degeneration after treatment with an effective rate of 71.4% (15/21). Ocular surface keratinization receded in 4 cases with an effective rate of 66.7%. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to severe toxic side effects. All patients tolerated mild drug-induced gastrointestinal reactions. Three patients terminated the treatment in advance after 4 to 6 months due to no improvement in the disease condition.Observation of clinical efficacy and safety findings demonstrated that low-dose MTX can be used to treat patients with advanced OCP.

Investigating methotrexate toxicity within a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial: Rationale and design of the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial-Adverse Events (CIRT-AE) Study

BACKGROUND

The role of low dose methotrexate (LDM) in potential serious toxicities remains unclear despite its common use. Prior observational studies investigating LDM toxicity compared LDM to other active drugs. Prior placebo-controlled clinical trials of LDM in inflammatory conditions were not large enough to investigate toxicity. The Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) is an ongoing NIH-funded, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of LDM in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We describe here the rationale and design of the CIRT-Adverse Events (CIRT-AE) ancillary study which aims to investigate adverse events within CIRT.

DESIGN

CIRT will randomize up to 7000 participants with cardiovascular disease and no systemic rheumatic disease to either LDM (target dose: 15-20mg/week) or placebo for an average follow-up period of 3-5 years; subjects in both treatment arms receive folic acid 1mg daily for 6 days each week. The primary endpoints of CIRT include recurrent cardio vascular events, incident diabetes, and all-cause mortality, and the ancillary CIRT-AE study has been designed to adjudicate other clinically important adverse events including hepatic, gastrointestinal, respiratory, hematologic, infectious, mucocutaneous, oncologic, renal, neurologic, and musculoskeletal outcomes. Methotrexate polyglutamate levels and genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms will be examined for association with adverse events.

SUMMARY

CIRT-AE will comprehensively evaluate potential LDM toxicities among subjects with cardiovascular disease within the context of a large, ongoing, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. This information may lead to a personalized approach to monitoring LDM in clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic modeling of therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

With the increasing use of different types of therapies in treating autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there is a need to utilize pharmacokinetic (PK) strategies to optimize the clinical outcome of these treatments. Various PK analysis approaches, including population PK modeling and physiologically based PK modeling, have been used to evaluate drug PK characteristics and population variability or to predict drug PK profiles in a mechanistic manner. This review outlines the PK modeling of major SLE therapies including immunosuppressants (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide, among others) and immunomodulators (intravenous immunoglobulin). It summarizes the population PK modeling, physiologically based PK modeling and model-based individualized dosing strategies to improve the therapeutic outcomes in SLE patients.

Treatment of Bullous Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) is an autoantibody-mediated vesiculobullous disease in patients with SLE. Autoimmunity in BSLE is characterized by the presence of circulating anti-type VII collagen antibodies. BSLE patients often present with multiple, tense, clear fluid-filled vesicles and bullae overlying erythematous edematous plaques. Skin biopsy from BSLE patients shows subepidermal bullae with numerous neutrophils and only occasional eosinophils. Furthermore, immunofluorescence examination showed linear deposition of lgG, lgA, C3, and C1q along the basement membrane zone. BSLE patients with corticosteroids treatment constantly do not receive a marked improvement, while dapsone generally dramatically improved the skin condition. Recently, it has been reported that quite a few cases of BSLE were successfully treated with other immune suppressive drugs. Therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of BSLE would be beneficial to cure the disease.

Cellular and urinary microRNA alterations in NZB/W mice with hydroxychloroquine or prednisone treatment

Determining alterations to disease-associated miRNAs induced by specific therapeutics may allow the use of tailored therapy in lupus. We determined miRNA alterations in female NZB/W lupus mice treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or prednisone (PRED) for 12 weeks beginning at 24 weeks-of-age. B cell, PBMC, and urinary miR-let-7a expression were decreased with HCQ or PRED treatment. HCQ or PRED treatment reduced miR-21 expression in mesangial cells, T cells, pDCs, PBMCs, and the urine. MiR-146a expression was reduced in mesangial cells with HCQ treatment and in pDCs with HCQ or PRED treatment. PRED treatment increased miR-155 expression in mesangial, B, and T cells and PBMCs yet decreased miR-155 expression in pDCs and the urine. In vitro studies confirmed that HCQ or PRED's anti-inflammatory actions are dependent on their ability to inhibit miRNA expression. Our studies indicate that lupus therapeutics may work, in part, by altering the expression of disease-associated miRNAs.

Recent advances in the treatment of lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis is a common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The concept of two phases of therapy for lupus nephritis, such as an induction phase and a maintenance phase, is widely accepted. Since the renal involvement in SLE is heterogeneous, the treatment of lupus nephritis is governed by its pathological type and ranges from nonspecific measures, such as maintenance of adequate blood pressure control and blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, to the use of immunosuppressive agents. Cyclophosphamide (CYC) in combination with prednisone has been the standard method of treatment of the proliferative forms of lupus nephritis. However, the high rates of progression to end-stage renal disease coupled with the adverse effects of CYC and prednisone have led to an intensive search for more effective and less toxic therapies for lupus nephritis. We review the options available for the treatment of proliferative and membranous lupus nephritis and summarize the results of recently published clinical trials that add new perspectives to the management of kidney disease in SLE.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in articular and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus

AIM

A prospective open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) and chloroquine (CQ) in articular and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Consecutive SLE patients were randomly assigned to either 10 mg MTX weekly or 150 mg CQ daily during 24 weeks. Outcome measures were: numbers of swollen and tender joints, duration of morning stiffness, visual analog scale (VAS) for articular pain, physician global assessment index, patient global assessment index, SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), disappearance of skin rash and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients consented to participate, 15 were allocated in the MTX group and 26 in the CQ group. Two patients on MTX dropped out due to side-effects and two in the CQ group, one due to side-effects and one due to inefficacy. Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters of the two groups were nearly identical. In both groups the clinical and laboratory parameters improved significantly over 24 weeks, except the ESR in the MTX group. The results of the outcome measures at the end of the trial did not differ significantly between the two groups, except morning stiffness (P < 0.05 in favor of the MTX group) and ESR (P < 0.01 in favor of the CQ group). Rise of serum alanine aminotransferase was observed in two cases in the MTX group and in none in the CQ group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose MTX appears to be as effective as CQ in patients with articular and cutaneous manifestations of SLE, having an acceptable toxicity profile. Results of this prospective study need to be confirmed in a larger study.

Low dosages: new chemotherapeutic weapons on the battlefield of immune-related disease

Chemotherapeutic drugs eliminate tumor cells at relatively high doses and are considered weapons against tumors in clinics and hospitals. However, despite their ability to induce cellular apoptosis, chemotherapeutic drugs should probably be regarded more as a class of cell regulators than cell killers, if the dosage used and the fact that their targets are involved in basic molecular events are considered. Unfortunately, the regulatory properties of chemotherapeutic drugs are usually hidden or masked by the massive cell death induced by high doses. Recent evidence has begun to suggest that low dosages of chemotherapeutic drugs might profoundly regulate various intracellular aspects of normal cells, especially immune cells. Here, we discuss the immune regulatory roles of three kinds of chemotherapeutic drugs under low-dose conditions and propose low dosages as potential new chemotherapeutic weapons on the battlefield of immune-related disease.

Drug monitoring in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To conduct an evidence-based review of the common medication toxicities and strategies and utility of drug toxicity monitoring among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

PubMed and other databases were searched for articles published between the years 1960 and 2010 for keywords referring to medication toxicity or monitoring strategies for 7 drugs commonly used in SLE. All relevant English-language articles were reviewed. Most of the evidence we reviewed comprised studies that addressed the incidence of toxicity-randomized trials that compare different monitoring strategies for these drugs do not exist.

RESULTS

Data to describe the frequency of adverse events and appropriate strategies for screening for these events are scarce. Toxicities do not appear to be substantially more common among patients with SLE compared to other conditions for which these drugs are used.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrates that the scientific basis for many aspects of drug toxicity monitoring is weak and that most current recommendations are based largely on expert consensus. We present a future research agenda to address these gaps.

Pharmacotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus

The pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is challenging owing to its unpredictable clinical course, the variable organ system involvement and the lack of clear understanding of disease pathogenesis. The widely used corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, which can control disease activity, have serious, potentially fatal, side effects. In the last decade, a better understanding of lupus pathogenesis has led to the development of biological agents that are directed at biomarkers. However, these biologicals also exert side effects due to infections resulting from completely eliminating immune cells (e.g., B cells) or cytokine signals (e.g., interferon-alpha) or affecting molecular targets outside the immune system (CD40L on platelets). New biomarker-driven clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of B-cell depletion, blocking of interferon signaling, inhibition of the mTOR pathway, and restoration of glutathione deficiency in lupus T cells.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) may present in a variety of clinical forms. Three recognized subtypes of cutaneous LE are acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE), and chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). ACLE may be localized (most often as a malar or 'butterfly' rash) or generalized. Multisystem involvement as a component of systemic LE (SLE) is common, with prominent musculoskeletal symptoms. SCLE is highly photosensitive, with predominant distribution on the upper back, shoulders, neck, and anterior chest. SCLE is frequently associated with positive anti-Ro antibodies and may be induced by a variety of medications. Classic discoid LE is the most common form of CCLE, with indurated scaly plaques on the scalp, face, and ears, with characteristic scarring and pigmentary change. Less common forms of CCLE include hyperkeratotic LE, lupus tumidus, lupus profundus, and chilblain lupus. Common cutaneous disease associated with, but not specific for, LE includes vasculitis, livedo reticularis, alopecia, digital manifestations such as periungual telangiectasia and Raynaud phenomenon, photosensitivity, and bullous lesions. The clinical presentation of each of these forms, their diagnosis, and the inter-relationships between cutaneous LE and SLE are discussed. Common systemic findings in SLE are reviewed, as are diagnostic strategies, including histopathology, immunopathology, serology, and other laboratory findings. Treatments for cutaneous LE initially include preventive (e.g. photoprotective) strategies and topical therapies (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). For skin disease not controlled with these interventions, oral antimalarial agents (most commonly hydroxychloroquine) are often beneficial. Additional systemic therapies may be subdivided into conventional treatments (including corticosteroids, methotrexate, thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone, and azathioprine) and newer immunomodulatory therapies (including efalizumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab). We review evidence for the use of these medications in the treatment of cutaneous LE.

New directions in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date overview of treatment approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), highlighting the multiplicity and heterogeneity of clinical symptoms that underlie therapeutic decisions. Discussion will focus on the spectrum of currently available therapies, their mechanisms and associated side-effects. Finally, recent developments with biologic treatments including rituximab, epratuzumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, and belimumab, will be discussed.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A MEDLINE literature search for 'systemic lupus erythematosus' and 'damage' and 'treatment' was undertaken for 1996-2008. Secondary citations were obtained from selected manuscripts. Individual case studies were excluded.

FINDINGS

SLE is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems, a clinical pattern of flares and remissions, and the presence of anti-nuclear autoantibodies. Whereas early symptoms most frequently involve the skin and joints, disease morbidity and mortality are usually associated with cardiovascular events and damage to major organs, particularly the kidneys. Many of the current therapeutic options are considered to be inadequate because of toxicities, accrual of organ damage, and insufficient control of the underlying disease pathology. Improved understanding of SLE pathogenesis and immunology has led to the identification of new treatment targets. Current interest is mainly focused on the targeted immunosuppressive actions provided by biologic therapy. Although the potential long-term beneficial or harmful effects of the new molecular treatments are unclear, their precise molecular targeting may reveal key relationships within the immune system and advance the cause of individualized molecular medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic compounds that target specific immunologic mechanisms offer a new paradigm in the treatment of SLE, one that may, at best, reverse the course of the disease and, at the very least, might provide some new alternatives to reduce symptoms and limit tissue damage without undue contribution to overall morbidity and mortality.

Retrospective review of methotrexate therapy in the treatment of chronic, noninfectious, nonnecrotizing scleritis

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness and steroid-sparing capabilities of methotrexate in the treatment of chronic, noninfectious, nonnecrotizing scleritis.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients treated for scleritis between January 1, 2000 and July 31, 2005 at the Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science at New Jersey Medical School of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Outcome measures included inflammation, corticosteroid and methotrexate dosages, visual acuity, and reported side effects.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients, with a total of 27 affected eyes, were included in the study: 15 women and three men with a mean age of 52 years. Inflammation control was achieved in 11 patients, nine women and two men. Successful corticosteroid sparing was achieved in 10 of the 11 patients, with three patients completely discontinuing corticosteroid use. Visual acuity was maintained or improved in 21 (78%) of 27 affected eyes. Eight patients reported adverse effects, with one patient discontinuing treatment because of unbearable fatigue. The dose of methotrexate ranged from 7.5 to 35 mg weekly. The mean duration of methotrexate therapy was 19 months (standard deviation, 11 months). There were no serious adverse reactions or long-term morbidity caused by methotrexate therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate seems to be a well-tolerated therapy that can reduce inflammation successfully and can decrease the corticosteroid requirement in the treatment of chronic, noninfectious, and nonnecrotizing scleritis.

Treatment of Proliferative Lupus Nephritis—A Critical Approach

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the current management of proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN), with a focus on strategies to improve long-term outcome and reduce treatment toxicity while minimizing the risk of relapse.

METHODS

The literature on treatment strategies used in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and PLN from 1975 to 2006, using PubMed from the National Library of Medicine, was reviewed.

RESULTS

The high efficacy of the standard therapeutic regimen of PLN, traditionally associating cyclophosphamide (CYC) with corticosteroids (CS), has markedly ameliorated the prognosis of the disease, with more than 80% of patients achieving complete or partial remission. The ameliorated renal prognosis has positively influenced the general survival rates. Ten-year survival rates now surpass 75% and continue to improve. In view of the improved survival, the major aims of treatment now include preventing long-term organ damage and minimizing treatment toxicity, which can contribute significantly to the chronic morbidity and mortality of lupus. A number of high-quality trials have been reported, making us more confident of the value of different immunosuppressive protocols, and several novel immunosuppressive drugs are still under investigation.

CONCLUSION

Recent basic and clinical research has enormously improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of SLE and has suggested new, targeted approaches to therapy. These targeted novel therapies are expected to help the patients with PLN in the next decade.

Newer therapeutic approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus: immunosuppressive agents

There has been unprecedented growth in new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). These approaches include re-evaluation of the doses and duration of therapy with traditional agents, including intravenous cyclophosphamide and azathioprine. Drugs that were developed for other uses are being applied to specific SLE manifestations, and have spurred larger scale trials for overall disease activity. In addition, several new agents show promise in clinical trials; many have safer toxicity profiles than do traditional therapies. Some of these agents have multiple immunomodulatory effects, whereas others interfere with a specific immunologic process in one of the pathogenetic pathways of SLE activity.

Emergence of targeted immune therapies for systemic lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterised by flares of rampant inflammation that can threaten, in an unpredictable manner, almost any organ in the body. Current standard of care is largely empiric, involving the use of corticosteroids and toxic immune suppressive agents that are widely acknowledged to have unacceptable side effects for long-term use. Recently, there have been significant advances in understanding the nature of some fundamental immune imbalances underlying the complicated clinical manifestations of SLE. Nevertheless attempts to develop and test more targeted, and potentially safer immune-modulating drugs for lupus have encountered significant obstacles, due to the lack of validated biological markers for disease flare and remission, and difficulties in the clinical assessment of the heterogeneous patients. In support of renewed interest in drug development for lupus, large collaborative groups have formed, and efforts are underway to develop objective biomarkers for SLE as well as to improve the standardisation and reproducibility of clinical outcome measures in multi-centre trials.

Oral effects of low-dose methotrexate treatment

Methotrexate is used increasingly in low-dose regimes for a variety of conditions, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. While certain adverse effects of low-dose methotrexate have been described in detail, oral complications have received little attention. This article includes a summary of the uses and pharmacology of low-dose methotrexate and the mechanisms that lead to general and oral toxicity. The literature relevant to potential oral adverse effects is discussed and 7 illustrative cases are presented. The oral effects noted range from nonhealing ulcers to lymphoma-like lesions. Dental practitioners should be aware of the possible oral effects of low-dose methotrexate that have so far been largely unrecognized.

Methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus

The most appropriate treatment of moderate, nonorgan threatening disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains poorly defined, although methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used. The results of 20 uncontrolled case series and a single retrospective cohort study tend to support its use to treat active skin and joint disease. Unfortunately, three prospective randomized trials have reported conflicting results. Two reported improvement in overall disease activity and decreased corticosteroid requirement with MTX. The third trial showed no benefit from MTX for disease activity, but did report a reduction in corticosteroid requirements. Difficulties in conducting trials in moderately active SLE are discussed.

Challenges in bringing the bench to bedside in drug development for sle

It is now widely accepted that the current standard of care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is inadequate. There has not been a new medication approved for this disease in thirty years. Attempts to develop and test new drugs have been ongoing since the mid-1990s, but have encountered formidable obstacles. Current models for lupus pathogenesis have provided a theoretical framework for understanding how heterogeneous genetic defects might combine in various ways to increase susceptibility to SLE in different individuals, and could have important implications for new drug development. With the current burst of drug discovery and increased public awareness of SLE, the impetus to overcome these obstacles has never been greater.

Novel Approaches to Therapy for SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease manifested by multi-organ involvement and elevated titers of anti-DNA antibodies. Current therapies for SLE are broadspectrum, and include steroids and immunosuppressive cytotoxic agents that are counterbalanced by the toxicity and side effects of the medications. One of the goals is to target therapies by altering specific known mechanisms of inflammation and autoimmunity. Although the inciting antigen is still unknown in SLE, it may be possible to alter the regulation of the immune response by targeted molecular therapy. Methods under investigation, which may be beneficial, are manipulation of second-signal stimulation of the immune response (anti-CD40L), manipulation of cytokines (monoclonal anti-IL-10), inducing tolerance by administration of blocking peptides (LJP394), and the manipulation of idiotypes (IVIg). In this article, we also discuss modalities that are steroid-sparing (MTX), and selective immunosuppression (stem-cell restoration and MMF). We review the ongoing literature from 2000-2002, utilizing the MEDLINE search. Controlled trials, open trials, and trials in phase I and II have been included, and anecdotal reports were excluded. The major advances have been with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and LJP 394.

Bullous SLE: response to methotrexate and relationship with disease activity

We report on a case of 40-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed a severe bullous eruption on sun-exposed areas. The bullous manifestation was associated with a flare of lupus serologies, whereas the previous manifestations of the disease were quiescent. Due to prior intolerance to many drugs, she was given oral methotrexate (10 mg/week). The drug administration was followed by a rapid and full resolution of cutaneous lesions. Five months later she developed a class III lupus nephritis. Our case is the first report of efficacy of methotrexate in bullous SLE and rises the question of the relationship between bullous eruption and SLE activity.

Newer drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis

This article first reviews the current treatment of lupus nephritis, with a focus on the most serious forms, that is, the proliferative subtypes. Current standards for treatment have been developed empirically. Corticosteroids form the basis of all regimens. Cyclophosphamide given intravenously for prolonged periods is the current gold standard. Azathioprine can be regarded as an effective drug for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. Studies on its efficacy in schedules for remission induction are in progress. It has been learned from studies on 'conventional' immunosuppression that randomised, clinical trials should comprise large numbers of patients and a follow-up of many years to elucidate differences between effective strategies. These requirements are not met by any of the 'new' treatments we discuss in this review. There is only limited experience in patients with lupus nephritis with drugs that are currently used for immunosuppression in other autoimmune diseases, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin and high-dose intravenous gammaglobulins, nor with new immunosuppressive drugs that have been developed for immunosuppression in organ transplantation (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, fludarabine and cladribine). Hormonal therapy with the weak androgen prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA) has no role in treatment of active lupus nephritis. There are interesting experiences with agents that have evolved from progress in immunobiology and in our understanding of immunological processes. These modalities enable more specific immunosuppression and include monoclonal antibodies directed at immune cells, cytokines and components of the complement system, constructs developed to induce tolerance in pathogenic B cells, and gene therapy. Finally, we review data on autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We conclude that some strategies (like mycophenolate mofetil) are good candidates for further investigation in large-scale, prospective, randomised trials with prolonged follow-up (which are almost by definition hard to perform). Most new biological agents still are in a pre-clinical phase.

Treatment options for juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory chronic disease characterized by the presence of activated helper T-cells that induce a B-cell response, resulting in the secretion of pathogenic autoantibodies and the formation of immune complexes. SLE in children is a disease of low prevalence with a wide range of clinical manifestations, which means that the number of randomized controlled studies are few and usually involve a small number of patients. In recent years, new therapeutic agents have appeared and the role of older treatments has been clarified. Many of these treatments are designed to reduce inflammation. The spectrum is broad and ranges from traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to cytotoxic agents that have anti-inflammatory effects. The current treatment of children or adults depends on the clinical expression of the disease. Minor manifestations usually respond to the administration of NSAIDs, low doses of corticosteroids, hydroxychloroquine, or methotrexate. Thalidomide could be used for refractory skin lesions. Major manifestations can endanger the patient's life and require early, aggressive treatment. Kidney disease and other manifestations have been related to the formation or deposit of tissular immune complexes. Therefore, for years the main aim of treatment has been to suppress the immune response. The immunosuppressant treatments used in children with SLE include high doses of corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide. Several combinations of medications have been used to obtain a rapid remission or to reduce the risk of toxicity of prolonged administration of cytotoxic agents. Intravenous gamma-globulin has been successfully used in the treatment of lupus nephritis, vasculitis, and acute thrombocytopenia. In spite of numerous published studies, the use of these drugs is still controversial. The immunosuppression achieved with these treatments is nonspecific, not always effective, and associated with significant toxicities; the most significant being growth retardation, accelerated atherosclerosis and severe infectious complications. The purpose of new biological therapies is to achieve specific immunosuppression, which makes it possible to design more effective and less toxic therapeutic strategies. Mycophenolate mofetil is a promising alternative in patients who do not respond to high doses of cyclophosphamide or azathioprine. Some recently developed monoclonal antibodies such as anti-CD40L or anti-IL-10, or other molecules such as LJP394 may prove useful in the near future. Finally, stem cell transplantation may be proposed in patients with severe juvenile-onset SLE who do not respond to any treatment.

Management of lupus erythematosus: recent insights

This article reviews and cites only publications relating to the management of lupus that have appeared since 1999. The data in these publications demonstrate that preventive and proactive strategies are as important as medication in improving the quality of life and life span of the patient with lupus. The use of lasers and thalidomide represents major advances in cutaneous lupus. The first major study over 25 years using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to manage lupus suggests benefits. Further evidence was presented showing that dehydroepiandrosterone, leflunomide, and methotrexate are effective in treating mild to moderate disease. Various iterations and modifications of traditional cyclophosphamide therapy with or without mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and azathioprine continue to be studied for treating organ-threatening disease. Intravenous gamma globulin and selective apheresis are niche therapies appropriate in a few, highly selected patients. Immunoablative doses of cyclophosphamide appear to be as effective as stem cell transplantation for serious disease resistant to conventional doses of cyclophosphamide. Twelve biologic agents have been studied in lupus since 1999, with only LJP-394 showing clear-cut, convincing efficacy.