Mycophenolate mofetil combined with prednisone for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: a histopathological study

Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and solutions

Refractory lupus nephritis, broadly defined as failure to attain clinical remission after appropriate induction immunosuppressive therapy, is associated with an increased risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease and mortality. This is a challenging issue in clinical practice, as modern induction therapy despite proven efficacy can still be associated with treatment failure. Moreover, newer therapies have failed in recent years to displace or even match existing protocols for effective induction of remission. Refractory disease is generally assessed on the basis of clinical parameters, which may be unreliable, and renal biopsy, which is often not performed in a standard or timely fashion. Persisting histological inflammation in 30%–50% of patients who have attained clinical remission highlights the disparity between clinical and immunological response to therapy. The lack of an international consensus regarding what constitutes refractory lupus nephritis compounds clinician indecision regarding optimal management for these patients. Moreover, non-adherence to prescribed therapy versus primary treatment failure can be challenging to discriminate, and the time point at which non-response becomes treatment failure is unclear. In this review, we assess the key published evidence for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and provide practical recommendations based around the use of adjunctive therapies. These agents include rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors, with evidence consisting largely of observational or uncontrolled studies, as well as some of the biologic therapies currently under investigation through prospective clinical trials. The poor prognosis of refractory lupus nephritis demands regular review of patient response and the flexibility to switch or augment therapy.

The value of repeat biopsy in lupus nephritis flares

Whether a repeat renal biopsy is helpful during lupus nephritis (LN) flares remains debatable. In order to analyze the clinical utility of repeat renal biopsy in this complex situation, we retrospectively reviewed our series of 54 LN patients who had one or more repeat biopsies performed only on clinical indications. Additionally, we reviewed 686 well-documented similar cases previously reported (PubMed 1990-2015).The analysis of all patients reviewed showed that histological transformations are common during a LN flare, ranging from 40% to 76% of cases. However, the prevalence of transformations and the clinical value of repeat biopsy vary when they are analyzed according to proliferative or nonproliferative lesions.The great majority of patients with class II (78% in our series and 77.5% in the literature review) progressed to a higher grade of nephritis (classes III, IV, or V), resulting in worse renal prognosis. The frequency of pathological conversion in class V is lower (33% and 43%, respectively) but equally clinically relevant, since almost all cases switched to a proliferative class. Therefore, repeat biopsy is highly advisable in patients with nonproliferative LN at baseline biopsy, because these patients have a reasonable likelihood of switch to a proliferative LN that may require more aggressive immunosuppression.In contrast, the majority of patients (82% and 73%) with proliferative classes in the reference biopsy (III, IV or mixed III/IV + V), remained into proliferative classes on repeat biopsy. Although rebiopsy in this group does not seem as necessary, it is still advisable since it will allow us to identify the 18% to 20% of patients that switch to a nonproliferative class. In addition, consistent with the reported clinical experience, repeat biopsy might also be helpful to identify selected cases with clear progression of proliferative lesions despite the initial treatment, for whom it is advisable to intensify inmunosuppression. Thus, our experience and the literature data support that repeat biopsy also brings more advantges than threats in this group.The results of the repeat biopsy led to a change in the immunosuppresive treatment in more than half of the patients on average, intensifying it in the majority of the cases, but also reducing it in 5% to 30%.

Mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent which provides protection against acute transplant rejection, in patients who undergo kidney, heart and liver transplantation. Recently MMF has been used in various autoimmune conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE, MMF has been more extensively used in the treatment of proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (GLN) and following the success in this field, it has also been used to control extra-renal manifestations. However, in the majority of cases MMF was administered to patients with refractory SLE manifestations and, therefore, no definite conclusion could be drawn from these experiences.

In this paper, after a brief description of the mechanisms of action, the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of MMF which are relevant in SLE, and after a short discussion on the utility of performing therapeutic dose monitoring of mycphenolic acid, the experiences with the use of this drug in the different SLE manifestations were summarized and some personal data in patients with GLN were reported. Finally, the hypothetical use of MMF as a preventive strategy against the occurrence of severe manifestations in patients with mild SLE has been put forward and discussed.

Current management of lupus nephritis: popular misconceptions

The management of lupus nephritis is typified by popular misconceptions: that there is a ‘standard of care’, that treatment has well-defined aims and that the optimum length of treatment is established. In reality, however, uncertainties still exist and the evidence base remains weak.

Until recently, initial therapy for class IV lupus nephritis typically involved intravenous cyclophosphamide, yet although cyclophosphamide is superior to azathioprine in improving renal function, it is not superior in terms of mortality. In fact, recent studies show mycophenolate mofetil to be superior to cyclophosphamide in terms of response rate and safety profile and at least as effective as other immunosuppressants. The role of steroids is unclear. Clearly, no standard of care exists in lupus nephritis.

The Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial found that treatment response at six months, in terms of reduced serum creatinine and proteinuria, was the best predictor of long-term renal outcome. Proteinuria, however, can take a long time to reach baseline levels, and normalization of urine is not the same as loss of histological disease activity. Response to treatment thus is not the same as disease remission. Although treatment should aim to reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease and death, control of proteinuria and prevention of flares are also important.

Patients who have nephritic flares are almost seven times as likely to progress to end-stage renal disease compared with those who do not. Regimens involving maintenance phases have been developed, but uncertainty remains about the risk of flares and how they can be predicted. The optimum duration of treatment has yet to be determined.

Characterization of glomerular diseases using proteomic analysis of laser capture microdissected glomeruli

The application of molecular techniques to characterize clinical kidney biopsies has the potential to provide insights into glomerular diseases that cannot be revealed by traditional renal pathology. The present work is a proof-of-concept approach to test whether proteomic analysis of glomeruli isolated from clinical biopsies by laser capture microdissection can provide unique information regarding differentially expressed proteins relevant to disease pathogenesis. The proteomes of glomeruli isolated by laser capture microdissection from biopsies of normal kidneys (living-related donor kidneys) were compared with those from patients with diabetic nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and fibronectin glomerulopathy. Glomerular proteins were extracted, trypsin digested, and subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for identification and quantitation. Relative to normal glomeruli, all disease-associated glomeruli showed an increased presence of complement components, a marked decline in podocyte-associated proteins, and a decrease in proteins associated with cellular metabolism. Additionally, fibronectin glomerulopathy glomeruli differed from all the other glomeruli because of a significant accumulation of fibronectin and fibulin. This study demonstrates that our method acquires reproducible and quantitative proteomic information from laser capture microdissection isolates that can be used to characterize the molecular features of glomerular diseases.

Induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis with leflunomide combined with prednisone: a prospective multi-centre observational study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, a prospective multi-centre observational study was conducted. Patients with biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis were assigned to receive either leflunomide or cyclophosphamide with concomitant prednisone. Leflunomide was given orally with a loading dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by 30 mg/day. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was administered monthly at a dose of 0.5 g/m2 of body-surface area. A total of 110 patients were enrolled, 70 in the leflunomide group and 40 in the cyclophosphamide group. The complete remission rate in the leflunomide group was 21% and partial remission rate 52%, as compared with 18% and 55%, respectively, in the cyclophosphamide group. Renal parameters and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index improved significantly and similarly in both groups. Serum creatinine decreased or stabilized in both treatment groups. No significant difference was noted with respect to clinical outcome between groups. Repeat biopsy also showed a significant reduction of active lesions in kidney pathology after 6 months of leflunomide treatment. Major adverse events, similar in both treatment groups, included infection, alopecia and hypertension. Leflunomide, compared with cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisone was effective in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis and was generally well-tolerated.

Mesangial cells of lupus-prone mice are sensitive to chemokine production

Infectious antigens may be triggers for the exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus. The underlying mechanism causing acceleration and exacerbation of lupus nephritis (LN) is largely unknown. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is capable of inducing an accelerated model of LN in NZB/W mice, featuring diffuse proliferation of glomerular resident cells. We hypothesized that mesangial cells (MCs) from LN subjects are more responsive to LPS than normal subjects. Cultured primary NZB/W and DBA/W (nonautoimmune disease-prone strain with MHC class II molecules identical to those of NZB/W) MCs were used. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and osteopontin (OPN) expressions either in the baseline (normal culture) condition or in the presence of LPS were evaluated by real-time PCR, ELISA, or western blot analysis. NF-κB was detected by ELISA, electrophoresis mobility-shift assay, and immunofluorescence. First, either in the baseline condition or in the presence of LPS, NZB/W MCs produced significantly higher levels of MCP-1 and OPN than the DBA/W MC controls. Second, NZB/W MCs expressed significantly higher levels of Toll-like receptor 4, myeloid differentiation factor 88, and NF-κB than the DBA/W MC controls, both receiving exactly the same LPS treatment. In conclusion, NZB/W MCs are significantly more sensitive than their normal control DBA/W MCs in producing both MCP-1 and OPN. With LPS treatment, the significantly elevated levels of both chemokines produced by NZB/W MCs are more likely due to a significantly greater activation of the Toll-like receptor 4-myeloid differentiation factor 88-associated NF-κB pathway. The observed abnormal molecular events provide an intrarenal pathogenic pathway involved in an accelerated type of LN, which is potentially infection triggered.

Role of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug successfully used for the prevention of acute and chronic rejection of renal allografts, as well as in the therapy of glomerular disorders. We treated three groups of patients with lupus nephritis: the first group of patients had a high histologic activity index (AI), 13.4 +/- 2.34; the second group of patients had a high histologic chronicity index (CI), 6.0 +/- 0.7; and the third group consisted of only two patients, one with low AI (3.5) and another with low CI (1.5). The patients were treated for 2 years. MMF was initiated at a dose of 2 g/daily for the first 6 months and the dose was decreased to 1.5 g/daily for the further 18 months. Steroids, 0.4 mg/kg/day, were the concomitant therapy for the first 6 months, with slow tapering for the further 18 months. Patients with high AI presented significant decrease of serum creatinine after 2 years, 286 +/- 112.95 to 131.2 +/- 44.65 micromol/L. Two of the patients, with acute oligoanuria, were withdrawn from dialysis treatment. Significant improvement was also noted, 6.97 +/- 1.81 to 0.9 +/- 0.31 g/day. Patients with high CI had nonsignificant decrease of serum creatinine, 178.5 +/- 47.73 to 129.25 +/- 22.88 micromol/L, and significant improvement of proteinuria, 4.63 +/- 1.57 to 1.14 +/- 0.39 g/day. The patient with low AI showed recovery of renal function (serum creatinine from 196 to 72 micromol/L) and alleviation of proteinuria, 7.93 to 3.4 g/day. The patient with low CI did not respond to the therapy and renal function slowly worsened. MMF has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for both the induction and maintenance phase in patients with lupus nephritis.

Mycophenolate Mofetil in Lupus Glomerulonephritis: Effectiveness and Tolerability

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent initially used in the treatment of transplant recipients. MMF has been used in renal, heart, and liver transplantation, where it seems more effective than other immunosuppressive regimens in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes. MMF has a variety of immunosuppressive effects, including selective suppression of T and B lymphocyte proliferation, and has been more recently used in many autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can potentially involve any organ or system of the human body. Glomerulonephritis (GLN) has been recognized as the most frequent severe manifestation of SLE, leading to poor long-term prognosis. In the treatment of lupus GLN, several therapeutic approaches, all including immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or cyclosporine A, have been used. The short- and long-term toxicity of these drugs limits their use in a substantial number of patients. Over the last few years, MMF has emerged as an alternative therapeutic regimen in lupus GLN, mainly for patients refractory to other therapies. These studies have shown that it is highly effective and generally well tolerated.

Treatment with cyclophosphamide delays the progression of chronic lesions more effectively than does treatment with azathioprine plus methylprednisolone in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of treatment with either pulse cyclophosphamide (CYC) or azathioprine (AZA) combined with methylprednisolone (MP), on serial biopsy results in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, and to evaluate the predictive value of various histopathologic and clinical parameters with regard to disease outcome.

METHODS

Biopsy specimens from patients with proliferative lupus nephritis, obtained at study entry and after 2 years of therapy, were scored according to a standardized method, and results assessed in relation to disease outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 87 patients originally enrolled, 39 underwent repeat biopsy. These patients were representative of the overall group, both at entry and at 2-year followup. The median activity index changed from 8.0 to 2.7 (no differences between the treatment groups). In the group treated with AZA plus MP (AZA group), the increase in the median chronicity index (from 2.7 to 3.8) was larger than that in the CYC group (from 2.7 to 3.0) (P = 0.050). In multivariate analyses, renal function at enrollment and after 2 years was the best predictor of renal function at the last visit, while none of the histopathologic variables (either at entry or at 2 years) added to this prediction. Comparing patients whose disease transitioned to class II with those who had persistent proliferative lupus nephritis revealed no differences between the treatment groups at either time point, and no clinical differences at 2 years. However, a higher serum creatinine level at entry and greater proteinuria at last visit were characteristic of patients who still had proliferative lupus nephritis at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that, although both CYC and AZA are effective in reducing active lesions in lupus nephritis, progression of chronic lesions is more effectively halted by CYC. Variables assessed by repeat biopsy do not predict clinical outcome.

Quality of life comparison between corticosteroid- and-mycofenolate mofetil and corticosteroid- and-oral cyclophosphamide in the treatment of severe lupus nephritis

There is accumulating evidence that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with corticosteroid, is an effective induction treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis and is associated with fewer adverse effects compared to cyclophosphamide (CTX), but the quality of life (QOL) associated with these regimens as perceived by the patient has not been compared. This study included patients who had experienced both treatment regimens, for distinct episodes of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. QOL parameters during the first six months of each treatment were assessed through SF36 and WHOQOL questionnaires. Twelve patients and 24 episodes of severe lupus nephritis were studied. CTX-treated and MMF-treated episodes showed comparable baseline characteristics and response rate, with complete remission occurring in 83.3%. MMF treatment was associated with higher numerical scores for all domains across both QOL instruments than CTX. MMF treatment was associated with significantly less fatigue, less impediment of physical and social functioning, and better psychological well being compared to CTX. When each patient served as her/his own control, most patients ascribed higher QOL domain scores to the MMF-treated episode. Seventy-five percent of patients found MMF treatment more acceptable and preferred when compared with CTX, and the complications that most concerned them included Cushingoid features, alopecia, menstrual disturbance and infections. These data showed that MMF-based induction immunosuppression for severe lupus nephritis was associated with better QOL than CTX as perceived by patients, which was most likely attributed to the reduced side-effects during MMF treatment.

Mycophenolate mofetil: What is its place in the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases?

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressant recently introduced in the treatment of autoimmune conditions. The greatest experience with the use of MMF has been achieved in the treatment of proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis. However, MMF has also been used to control SLE extra-renal manifestations as well as other autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as idiopathic inflammatory arthropathies, inflammatory myopathies, systemic sclerosis, and systemic vasculitis. MMF seems to be well tolerated and effective and could be considered a useful alternative to standard immunosuppressants for the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic disorders. However, further studies are needed in order to determine its real place in the treatment of these conditions. In this paper, the use of MMF in different autoimmune rheumatic diseases is reviewed and discussed.

[Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis refractory to intravenous cyclophosphamide]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in lupus nephritis (LN) patients with prior failure to intravenous cyclophosphamide over a 12-month follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eleven patients with LN were included. MMF doses ranged from 1.5-2 grams per day. In all patients, 24-h urinary protein excretion, creatinine clearance, and serum creatinine were evaluated. Treatment-related adverse effects were recorded over the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Basal proteinuria decreased from 1.63 g/L (95% CI: 0.78-2.5) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.1-1.62) g/L at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.04). Creatinine clearance showed a tendency to improve but no statistically significant differences were found, 69.2 (95% CI 51.4- 87.4) vs. 79.29 (IC 95% 49.2-109.3) ml/min, respectively; p = 0.90). No significant differences were found in the remaining variables. Patients without response to MMF had a higher chronicity index than those with good or average response.

CONCLUSION

MMF doses of 1.5-2 grams per day are a good alternative in LN patients without response to intravenous cyclophosphamide and a low chronicity index. No severe adverse effects were found.

Mycophenolate mofetil is effective in reducing lupus glomerulonephritis proteinuria

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly reduces proteinuria in experimental model of human membranous nephropathy (Heymann nephritis). Twenty consecutive SLE patients with persistent isolated severe proteinuria and/or proteinuric flare were studied for 18 months of MMF therapy. All of them presented stable renal function and 12 had biopsy proven membranous glomerulonephritis (WHO class V). The starting daily dose for MMF was 1.5 g to a maximum of 3 g. Patients were divided into: partial response, >or=50% decrease of baseline proteinuria; complete response, normal proteinuria levels (less than 0.3 g/24 h); flare, increase of at least 50% of the mean baseline proteinuria. All 20 SLE patients (100%) presented a 50% reduction of baseline proteinuria which was achieved in 8.2+/-3.3 months of MMF therapy, at a mean daily dose of 2.3+/-0.5 g. A significant decrease in 24-h protein excretion was observed compared to entry (3.47+/-1.26 vs. 1.33+/-0.67 g, P<0.0001) as well as a correspondent increase of serum albumin (3.2+/-0.4 vs. 3.7+/-0.4 mg/dl, P=0.02) and reduction of prednisone dose (33.7+/-20.0 to 18.6+/-14.1 mg/day, P=0.01). Complete response was observed in 11 SLE patients (55%) in 12.2+/-3.0 months of therapy with a significant decrease in proteinuria (P<0.0001), prednisone dose (P<0.0001) and an increase of serum albumin (P=0.003). Interestingly, initial proteinuria or serum albumin levels did not identify patients with complete response and those with partial response at the end of the study (P=0.543 and 0.657, respectively). Our pilot prospective study suggests that MMF appears to be effective in reducing severe persistent proteinuria in lupus glomerulonephritis, even in patients unresponsive to other immunosuppressive treatments.

Emergence of targeted immune therapies for systemic lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterised by flares of rampant inflammation that can threaten, in an unpredictable manner, almost any organ in the body. Current standard of care is largely empiric, involving the use of corticosteroids and toxic immune suppressive agents that are widely acknowledged to have unacceptable side effects for long-term use. Recently, there have been significant advances in understanding the nature of some fundamental immune imbalances underlying the complicated clinical manifestations of SLE. Nevertheless attempts to develop and test more targeted, and potentially safer immune-modulating drugs for lupus have encountered significant obstacles, due to the lack of validated biological markers for disease flare and remission, and difficulties in the clinical assessment of the heterogeneous patients. In support of renewed interest in drug development for lupus, large collaborative groups have formed, and efforts are underway to develop objective biomarkers for SLE as well as to improve the standardisation and reproducibility of clinical outcome measures in multi-centre trials.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials and cohort studies of mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant drug being used for induction and maintenance of remission of lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Evidence about its use was sought from full publications and abstracts of randomised trials and cohort studies by using a variety of search strategies. Efficacy and adverse event outcomes were sought. Five randomised trials enrolled patients with World Health Organization (WHO) class III, IV, or V (mostly IV) lupus nephritis, predominantly comparing MMF (1 to 3 g daily) with cyclophosphamide and steroid. Complete response and complete or partial response was significantly more frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, with numbers needed to treat of 8 (95% confidence interval 4.3 to 60) to induce one additional complete or partial response, with wide confidence intervals. Death was reported less frequently with MMF (0.7%, 1 death in 152 patients) than with cyclophosphamide (7.8%, 12 deaths in 154 patients), with a number needed to treat to prevent (NNTp) one death of 14 (8 to 48). Hospital admission was also lower with MMF (1.7% versus 15%; NNTp 7.4 [4.8 to 16]). Serious infections, leucopaenia, amenorrhoea, and hair loss were all significantly less frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, but diarrhoea was significantly more common with MMF. Ten of 18 cohort studies enrolled only patients with lupus nephritis (author-defined or WHO class III to V). Seven of these 10 reported that complete or partial response with MMF (mostly 1 or 2 g daily) with steroid occurred in 121/151 (80%) and that treatment failure or no response occurred in 30/151 (20%). Adverse events were generally similar in cohort studies with and without only patients with lupus nephritis. In all 18 cohorts, gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting) occurred in 30%, infection in 23%, and serious infection in 4.3%. Adverse event discontinuations occurred in 14% and lack of efficacy occurred in 10%. There was a single death with MMF, a mortality rate over the course of 1 year of approximately 0.2%. The results form a basis on which to plan future studies and provide a guide for the use of MMF in lupus nephritis until results of larger studies are available. At least one such study is under way.

Mycophenolate mofetil in children with steroid-dependent and/or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new agent for treatment of a variety of glomerular diseases. This study examines the safety and efficacy of MMF in treating pediatric patients with steroid-dependent (SD) and/or frequently relapsing (FR) nephrotic syndrome (NS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients with SDNS and/or FRNS treated with MMF for at least 3 months. MMF was used in 11 patients with SDNS (n=10) and FRNS (n=1), including 7 males and 4 females.

RESULTS

Mean age at time of diagnosis of NS was 3.3 years (range, 1.1-8.5 years), and at the start of MMF 5.9 years (range, 2.9-10 years). Seven patients had a renal biopsy prior to starting MMF; all had mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Mean follow-up after starting MMF was 12.2 months (range, 4-24 months). Mean MMF dose was 948 mg/m2/day (range, 500-1087 mg/m2/day). MMF resulted in improvement in 9 of 11 patients, with 8 patients weaned off steroids completely, with a reduction in the mean relapse rate from 4.7 relapses/patient/year (range, 2.4-6) before MMF to 1.05 relapses/patient/year (range, 0-4.5) after MMF therapy (P=0.0001). The relative risk for relapse before MMF was 4.7 (P=0.0002). None of the patients had significant adverse events or intolerance to MMFtherapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that MMF is a safe and effective option for treatment of children with SDNS and/or FRNS.

Treatment for lupus nephritis: a revisit

The optimal treatment of severe lupus nephritis remains unclear. Regimens consisting of steroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) appear to be most effective. Infection and gonadal toxicity is a major concern of CYC use in patients of reproductive age. In addition, failure to respond or refractory to CYC treatment may lead to the development of end-stage renal disease. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent that selectively inhibits activated lymphocytes and renal mesangial cells. Data from experimental lupus nephritis and controlled studies, albeit small and lacking statistical power, have revealed that MMF is as effective in lupus patients as CYC in the induction of renal remission or as maintenance therapy to reduce renal flare in the short term. The significantly less ovarian toxicity and infection when compared to CYC are particularly attractive for the consideration of MMF in lupus nephritis. The potential of other new therapeutic agents is discussed together with the need for patient recruitment in future trials of lupus nephritis to address the importance of ethnicity as well as histological grading.

Challenges in bringing the bench to bedside in drug development for sle

It is now widely accepted that the current standard of care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is inadequate. There has not been a new medication approved for this disease in thirty years. Attempts to develop and test new drugs have been ongoing since the mid-1990s, but have encountered formidable obstacles. Current models for lupus pathogenesis have provided a theoretical framework for understanding how heterogeneous genetic defects might combine in various ways to increase susceptibility to SLE in different individuals, and could have important implications for new drug development. With the current burst of drug discovery and increased public awareness of SLE, the impetus to overcome these obstacles has never been greater.

Review of the immunosuppressant enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic, Novartis Pharma AG) is an advanced formulation delivering mycophenolic acid (MPA). EC-MPS was designed to improve MPA-related upper gastrointestinal adverse events by delaying the release of MPA until reaching the small intestine. At a dose of 720 mg, EC-MPS exhibits equivalent MPA exposure (area under the concentration curve [AUC]) and maximal MPA concentration (C(max)) to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept, Roche AG) 1000 mg. The time to maximal MPA concentration (T(max)) for EC-MPS is delayed relative to that for MMF, consistent with a functioning enteric coating. EC-MPS 720 mg b.i.d. has demonstrated therapeutic equivalence to MMF 1000 mg b.i.d. in renal transplant patients. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that EC-MPS is as effective and safe as MMF in both de novo and maintenance renal transplant patients. Furthermore, studies have confirmed that maintenance patients can be safely converted from MMF to EC-MPS with no compromise of efficacy or safety. EC-MPS therefore presents physicians and patients with a valid alternative MPA therapy with a comparable efficacy and safety profile to MMF.