Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis

Case report of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in a 24-year-old female: an uncommon presentation

Background

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a form of autoimmune encephalitis. Due to the variability of the initial symptoms, anti-NMDAR encephalitis is not only underdiagnosed but also can be misdiagnosed as viral encephalitis or other pathologies. The origin of this disease is often paraneoplastic. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis preferentially affects children and young adults, and it has a male/female ratio of 1/4. In case of clinical suspicion, electroencephalogram and brain magnetic resonance imaging are useful, but lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis is used to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment for this disease includes immunosuppression and tumour resection when indicated.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 24-year-old female admitted to the emergency room following the onset of acute confusion. Due to the rapid deterioration of consciousness, swallowing disorders, respiratory failure and severe bradycardia the patient was intubated. On day 23 after presentation, brain magnetic resonance suggested autoimmune limbic encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid results were positive for anti-NMDA antibodies. After IV methylprednisolone and plasmapheresis and a second line therapy with corticosteroid and mycophenolic acid, the patient’s clinical condition gradually improved.

Conclusions

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis typically occurs in young patients with no history of acute psychiatric symptoms. The possibility of this pathology should be taken into account before diagnosing a patient with a psychiatric illness.

Clinical Approach to Autoimmune Epilepsy

Autoimmune epilepsy is a newly emerging area of epilepsy. The concept of “autoimmune” as an etiology has recently been revisited thanks to advances in autoimmune encephalitis and precision medicine with immunotherapies. Autoimmune epilepsy presents with specific clinical manifestations, and various diagnostic approaches including cerebrospinal fluid analysis, neuroimaging, and autoantibody tests are essential for its differential diagnosis. The diagnosis is often indeterminate despite performing a thorough evaluation, and therefore empirical immunotherapy may be applied according to the judgment of the clinician. Autoimmune epilepsy often manifests as new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). A patient classified as NORSE should receive empirical immunotherapy as soon as possible. On the other hand, a morecautious, stepwise approach is recommended for autoimmune epilepsy that presents with episodic events. The type of autoimmune epilepsy is also an important factor to consider when choosing from among various immunotherapy options. Clinicians should additionally take the characteristics of antiepileptic drugs into account when using them as an adjuvant therapy. This expert opinion discusses the diagnostic and treatment approaches for autoimmune epilepsy from a practical point of view.

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces STAT3 phosphorylation in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a highly variable autoimmune disease that can involve severe organ-threatening symptoms, such as lupus nephritis. Certain drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), are effective at reducing morbidity associated with nephritis; however, the immune pathways associated with disease suppression are poorly defined. Here, we provide evidence that MMF inhibits phosphorylation of STAT3 and other associated immune pathways. Using mass cytometry and bead-based or ELISA assays, the systemic phenotype of SLE patients not taking (MMF-) or taking (MMF+) MMF were studied. MMF+ SLE patients had significant reductions in total numbers of transitional B cells, plasmablasts, and T cells, specifically CD4+ Th17-type and CD4+ Treg-type cells, compared with MMF- patients. Plasma soluble mediators were decreased in MMF+ patients including chemokines (MIG/CXCL9 and SDF-1α/CXCL12) and growth factors (VEGF-A and PDGF-BB). Soluble mediators and cell subsets grouped by functional properties revealed significant modifications associated with STAT3 and B cell pathways. Further, healthy PBMCs treated with IL-6 revealed a reduction in p-STAT3 following the addition of mycophenolic acid (the active metabolite of MMF). In conclusion, the inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation by MMF may explain the effectiveness of this treatment in SLE patients, since increased levels of p-STAT3 are associated with disease pathology.

Juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) - Pathophysiological concepts and treatment options

The systemic autoimmune/inflammatory condition systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) manifests before the age of 16 years in 10-20% of all cases. Clinical courses are more severe, and organ complications are more common in patients with juvenile SLE. Varying gender distribution in different age groups and increasing severity with younger age and the presence of monogenic disease in early childhood indicate distinct differences in the pathophysiology of juvenile versus adult-onset SLE. Regardless of these differences, classification criteria and treatment options are identical. In this article, we discuss age-specific pathomechanisms of juvenile-onset SLE, which are currently available and as future treatment options, and propose reclassification of different forms of SLE along the inflammatory spectrum from autoinflammation to autoimmunity.

Treatment strategies for autoimmune encephalitis

Autoimmune encephalitis is one of the most rapidly growing research topics in neurology. Along with discoveries of novel antibodies associated with the disease, clinical experience and outcomes with diverse immunotherapeutic agents in the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis are accumulating. Retrospective observations indicate that early aggressive treatment is associated with better functional outcomes and fewer relapses. Immune response to first-line immunotherapeutic agents (corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and immunoadsorption) is fair, but approximately half or more of patients are administered second-line immunotherapy (rituximab and cyclophosphamide). A small but significant proportion of patients are refractory to all first- and second-line therapies and require further treatment. Although several investigations have shown promising alternatives, the low absolute number of patients involved necessitates more evidence to establish further treatment strategies. In this review, the agents used for first- and second-line immunotherapy are discussed and recent attempts at finding new treatment options are introduced.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of severely active lupus nephritis

Background

Plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations may predict therapeutic response in active lupus nephritis (LN). We determined the efficacy and safety of a concentration-controlled MPA regime in the treatment of severely active LN.

Methods

In this prospective study, 19 biopsy-proven class III/IV LN patients were treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for 48 weeks. The MMF dosage was based on maximal plasma MPA concentration at 1-hour post dose (MPA-C1). All patients had plasma MPA-C1 levels monitored weekly until achieving the targeted level of >13 mg/L. A low-dose steroid protocol was started at 0.5 mg/kg/day and rapidly tapered to 5 mg/day. Therapeutic response was evaluated at week 24 and week 48. MPA area-under-the curve (MPA-AUC0–12h) was measured at week 12 to verify the optimum dosage.

Results

No death or end-stage kidney disease occurred in this study. Seventeen patients (89%) responded to therapy at week 24 with four (21%) patients having complete response. There was no renal relapse at week 48 and four more patients had converted from partial response to complete response. Seventy eight percent of patients achieved the recommended MPA-AUC0–12h level. No association between plasma MPA concentrations and adverse reactions or infections was found.

Conclusions

MPA-C1 may be a practical monitoring of MPA levels in patients with LN. It is convenient to monitor and may facilitate an optimum estimate of MPA exposure.

Immune and inflammatory role in renal disease

Chronic and acute renal diseases, irrespective of the initiating cause, have inflammation and immune system activation as a common underlying mechanism. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of immune cells and inflammatory proteins that contribute to the pathogenesis of renal disease, and to discuss some of the physiological changes that occur in the kidney as a result of immune system activation. An overview of common forms of acute and chronic renal disease is provided, followed by a discussion of common therapies that have anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive effects in the treatment of renal disease.

Development of population PK model with enterohepatic circulation for mycophenolic acid in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

AIM

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) enterohepatic recycling model for MPA in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE).

METHODS

MPA concentration-time data were from outpatients on stable oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and collected under fasting conditions, with standardized meals (1 and 4 h post-dose). Sampling times were pre-dose, 20, 40 min, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 9 h, post dose. The population PK analysis simultaneously modelled MPA and 7-O-MPA-β-glucuronide (MPAG) concentrations using nonlinear mixed effect modelling.

RESULTS

PK analysis included 186 MPA and MPAG concentrations (mg l(-1)) from 19 patients. cSLE patients, age range 10-28 years, median 16.5 years were included. Mean ± SD disease duration was 3.8 ± 3.7 years. The final PK model included a gallbladder compartment for enterohepatic recycling and bile release time related to meal times, with first order absorption and single series of transit compartments. The PK estimates for MPA were CL(1) /F 25.3 l h(-1), V(3) /F 20.9 l, V(4) /F 234 l and CL(2) /F 19.8 l h(-1).

CONCLUSION

The final model fitted the complex processes of absorption and enterohepatic circulation (EHC) in those treated with MMF for cSLE and could be applied in Bayesian dose optimization algorithms.

[A patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a 12-year follow-up]

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic immunological disease causing a significant morbidity and mortality in younger women and involving several organs and systems, most often the kidneys, being consequently the incidence of lupus nephritis (LN) about 60%.

CASE REPORT

We reported a 57 year-old patient with the diagnosed SLE in 1995. Pathohistological analysis of kidney biopsy revealed LN type V. The patient was treated with corticosteroid pulses and azathioprine during one year. A remission was achieved and maintained with prednisone, 15 mg daily. Nephrotic relapse was diagnosed in 2006 and the second kidney biopsy revealed recent kidney infarction due to extensive vasculitis. Soon, a cerebrovascul insult developed and CT-scan revealed endocranial infarctus. The patient was treated with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide pulses (totally VI monthly pulses), and also with low-molecular heparine, anticoagulants and salicylates because of the right leg phlebothrombosis. After the pulses, the patient was adviced to take prednisone 20 mg daily and azothioprine 100 mg daily, and 6 months later mycophenolate mofetil because of persistent active serological immunological findings (ANA 1:320) and nephrotic syndrome. Mycophenolate mofetil was efficient in inducing and maintaining remission of nephrotic syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The aim of LN treatment is to achieve and maintain remission, improve patients' outcome, reduce the toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs and the incidence of relapses.Mycophenolate mofetil was shown to be efficient in inducing and maintaining remission of nephrotic syndrome in the frame of LN.

Intrarenal production of B-cell survival factors in human lupus nephritis

The B-cell survival factors APRIL and BLyS are important for B-cell maturation and activation and contribute to human autoimmune diseases. Interference with B-cell function by targeting these molecules is currently being investigated in large clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus. The local expression patterns of APRIL and BLyS have not been investigated in detail in kidneys with lupus nephritis. We studied the mRNA expression of APRIL, BLyS, and the corresponding receptors BCMA, TACI, and BAFF-R in microdissected human biopsies with proliferative lupus nephritis (n=25) and compared it with pretransplant biopsies of living donors (n=9). APRIL and BLyS mRNA levels were significantly higher in glomeruli of patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (12- and 30-fold, respectively). Tubulointerstitial expression of APRIL, BLyS, BCMA, and TACI was also significantly elevated. To localize the respective proteins in the kidney, APRIL, BLyS, and BAFF-R were studied by immunohistochemistry in renal biopsies with proliferative (n=21) or membranous (n=8) lupus nephritis. APRIL was prominently expressed in glomeruli with proliferative, but not membranous, lupus nephritis. The staining pattern was consistent with mesangial cells. A prominent accumulation of CD68-positive cells was present in glomeruli in association with APRIL expression. APRIL, BLyS, and BAFF-R were also expressed in interstitial inflammatory cell accumulation. This is the first study, which details local expression of APRIL and BLyS in glomeruli and tubulointerstitium of human proliferative lupus nephritis. This information might help define intrarenal effects of APRIL and BLyS inhibition in human lupus nephritis.

The efficacy of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of lupus nephritis in Taiwanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has recently been introduced as an immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of glomerulonephritis with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the data have been encouraging. However, response to MMF treatment appears to differ ethnically. Therefore, we determined efficacy and safety of low-dose MMF for Taiwanese patients with lupus nephritis. We studied 36 lupus nephritis patients who were treated with MMF. The dose started at 0.5 g/day and we collected the data from patients who received up to 1 g/day MMF. Outcome measures were 24 h for proteinuria, serum creatinine, C3/C4 levels, and anti-dsDNA titers collected at the baseline and at 3-month treatment intervals. Daily urinary protein significantly decreased from 6.15 +/- 4.28 g to 2.69 +/- 2.36 g at the last visit (P < 0.01) in spite of the significant absence of changes in serum creatinine levels. The response rate was 65.7% including five (14.3%) cases of complete remission and 18 (51.4%) cases of partial remission. The concomitant oral prednisolone dose decreased significantly from 20.07 +/- 11.78 mg/day to 13.93 +/- 6.79 mg/day at 6 months (P < 0.01). The level of C3 increased significantly from 59.46 +/- 32.73 to 71.99 +/- 25.81 (P < 0.01) and the anti-dsDNA antibody titer decreased from 161.71 +/- 221.42 to 46.57 +/- 117.47 (P < 0.01). No severe adverse effects were observed in the study. Low-dose MMF (0.5 to 1 g/day) combined with glucocorticoids appears to be a safe and effective therapy for lupus nephritis in Taiwanese patients. Our results suggest that lupus nephritis in Oriental patients might respond to lower doses of MMF than Caucasians.

Induction and maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacies and toxicities of immunosuppressive treatments for lupus nephritis (LN) versus cyclophosphamide (CYC). A meta-analysis was performed to determine treatment efficacy and toxicity outcomes between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and CYC induction therapies, between MMF and azathioprine (AZA) as maintenance therapies, and between low-dose intravenous (IV) CYC and high-dose IV CYC therapy. Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of induction therapies, MMF did not increase complete remission or partial remission rates as compared with CYC. However, the relative risks (RRs) of amenorrhea and leukopenia tended to be lower in the MMF group than in the CYC group. Meta-analysis of MMF versus AZA as a maintenance therapy showed no difference between the two groups in terms of response rates or the risk of developing end-stage renal disease. Low-dose IV CYC therapy had lower relapse rates than high-dose IV CYC therapy (RR 0.465, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.261—0.830, p-value 0.010), and was associated with a lower infection risk (RR 0.688, 95% CI 0.523—0.905, p-value 0.008). In conclusion, MMF was found to be as effective as CYC and tended to have a better safety profile as an induction therapy for LN than CYC.

[Immunosuppresive treatment in patients with lupus glomerulonephritis. Review of adverse events]

The prognosis of lupus nephritis has improved significantly over the past few decades. This has been partly contributed to by a better understanding of the natural history of the disease, improved treatment regimens, and the use of adjunctive treatments. Despite the development of new modalities, cyclophosphamide (CYC) remains the preferred initial treatment for severe proliferative lupus nephritis. Controversies continue about the best route, dosage, and duration of CYC treatment. However, adverse events as major infections, neoplasia and permanent amenorrhea, remain as a great concern for physicians and patients. For recalcitrant disease, new immunosuppresive and immunomodulating agents, nucleoside analogues and the biological response modifiers can be considered. New treatments directed against more specific targets may theoretically be associated with higher efficacy and lower toxicity. Longterm studies are needed with new treatments to verify this assumed lower toxicity.

[Mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis refractory to intravenous cyclophosphamide]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in lupus nephritis (LN) patients with prior failure to intravenous cyclophosphamide over a 12-month follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eleven patients with LN were included. MMF doses ranged from 1.5-2 grams per day. In all patients, 24-h urinary protein excretion, creatinine clearance, and serum creatinine were evaluated. Treatment-related adverse effects were recorded over the 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Basal proteinuria decreased from 1.63 g/L (95% CI: 0.78-2.5) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.1-1.62) g/L at the end of the follow-up period (p = 0.04). Creatinine clearance showed a tendency to improve but no statistically significant differences were found, 69.2 (95% CI 51.4- 87.4) vs. 79.29 (IC 95% 49.2-109.3) ml/min, respectively; p = 0.90). No significant differences were found in the remaining variables. Patients without response to MMF had a higher chronicity index than those with good or average response.

CONCLUSION

MMF doses of 1.5-2 grams per day are a good alternative in LN patients without response to intravenous cyclophosphamide and a low chronicity index. No severe adverse effects were found.

Mycophenolate mofetil is effective in reducing lupus glomerulonephritis proteinuria

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) significantly reduces proteinuria in experimental model of human membranous nephropathy (Heymann nephritis). Twenty consecutive SLE patients with persistent isolated severe proteinuria and/or proteinuric flare were studied for 18 months of MMF therapy. All of them presented stable renal function and 12 had biopsy proven membranous glomerulonephritis (WHO class V). The starting daily dose for MMF was 1.5 g to a maximum of 3 g. Patients were divided into: partial response, >or=50% decrease of baseline proteinuria; complete response, normal proteinuria levels (less than 0.3 g/24 h); flare, increase of at least 50% of the mean baseline proteinuria. All 20 SLE patients (100%) presented a 50% reduction of baseline proteinuria which was achieved in 8.2+/-3.3 months of MMF therapy, at a mean daily dose of 2.3+/-0.5 g. A significant decrease in 24-h protein excretion was observed compared to entry (3.47+/-1.26 vs. 1.33+/-0.67 g, P<0.0001) as well as a correspondent increase of serum albumin (3.2+/-0.4 vs. 3.7+/-0.4 mg/dl, P=0.02) and reduction of prednisone dose (33.7+/-20.0 to 18.6+/-14.1 mg/day, P=0.01). Complete response was observed in 11 SLE patients (55%) in 12.2+/-3.0 months of therapy with a significant decrease in proteinuria (P<0.0001), prednisone dose (P<0.0001) and an increase of serum albumin (P=0.003). Interestingly, initial proteinuria or serum albumin levels did not identify patients with complete response and those with partial response at the end of the study (P=0.543 and 0.657, respectively). Our pilot prospective study suggests that MMF appears to be effective in reducing severe persistent proteinuria in lupus glomerulonephritis, even in patients unresponsive to other immunosuppressive treatments.

Basic immunosuppressive drugs outside solid organ transplantation

Immunosuppressive drugs are the backbone of solid organ transplantation. The introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs led to improved patient and organ survival rates. Nowadays, acute rejection can be reduced to a minimum. Individualization and avoidance of drug-related adverse effects became a new goal to achieve. The potency of immunosuppressive drugs makes them attractive for use in various autoimmune diseases; therefore, the experience on immunosuppressive drugs outside the field of organ transplantation is analysed in this review.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials and cohort studies of mycophenolate mofetil in lupus nephritis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant drug being used for induction and maintenance of remission of lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Evidence about its use was sought from full publications and abstracts of randomised trials and cohort studies by using a variety of search strategies. Efficacy and adverse event outcomes were sought. Five randomised trials enrolled patients with World Health Organization (WHO) class III, IV, or V (mostly IV) lupus nephritis, predominantly comparing MMF (1 to 3 g daily) with cyclophosphamide and steroid. Complete response and complete or partial response was significantly more frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, with numbers needed to treat of 8 (95% confidence interval 4.3 to 60) to induce one additional complete or partial response, with wide confidence intervals. Death was reported less frequently with MMF (0.7%, 1 death in 152 patients) than with cyclophosphamide (7.8%, 12 deaths in 154 patients), with a number needed to treat to prevent (NNTp) one death of 14 (8 to 48). Hospital admission was also lower with MMF (1.7% versus 15%; NNTp 7.4 [4.8 to 16]). Serious infections, leucopaenia, amenorrhoea, and hair loss were all significantly less frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, but diarrhoea was significantly more common with MMF. Ten of 18 cohort studies enrolled only patients with lupus nephritis (author-defined or WHO class III to V). Seven of these 10 reported that complete or partial response with MMF (mostly 1 or 2 g daily) with steroid occurred in 121/151 (80%) and that treatment failure or no response occurred in 30/151 (20%). Adverse events were generally similar in cohort studies with and without only patients with lupus nephritis. In all 18 cohorts, gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting) occurred in 30%, infection in 23%, and serious infection in 4.3%. Adverse event discontinuations occurred in 14% and lack of efficacy occurred in 10%. There was a single death with MMF, a mortality rate over the course of 1 year of approximately 0.2%. The results form a basis on which to plan future studies and provide a guide for the use of MMF in lupus nephritis until results of larger studies are available. At least one such study is under way.

[New therapeutic concepts for vasculitis and collagenosis]

After improvement of the prognosis of the primary systemic vasculitides and systemic lupus erythematosus from a desperate diagnosis with hardly a one year survival after diagnosis to a 5-year-survival-rate of more than 90% actual therapeutic regimes aim at those patients refractory to standard therapeutic regimes, not achieving a remission by standard approaches or having organ damage or contraindications. Furthermore less toxic regimes are looked for with the aim to avoid secondary complications of the standard therapy. New drugs used successfully in rheumatology, transplantation medicine and haematology are used for these purposes in the last years. Recent experiences with Infliximab, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Rituximab und Deoxyspergualin for the treatment of the small vessel vasculitides and systemic lupus erythematosus are reviewed.