Delayed post-traumatic stress and memory inflation of life-threatening events following a natural disaster: prospective study

The neuroscientific basis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): From brain to treatment

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating mental health condition resulting from exposure to traumatic events, marked by persistent psychological distress and impairment in daily functioning. Risk factors for PTSD include genetic predispositions, neurobiological factors, as well as psychosocial and environmental influences. Specific demographic groups, such as veterans, first responders, and individuals in high-risk environments, are more susceptible to developing the disorder. Despite growing research, there remain gaps in understanding the full pathophysiology of PTSD, and existing diagnostic methods and treatments are not universally effective, contributing to a significant public health burden. This chapter explores the pathophysiology of PTSD, focusing on its underlying mechanisms, associated risk factors, and high-risk populations. Biological biomarkers such as neuroimaging findings, hormonal imbalances, genetic predispositions, and physiological indicators are discussed in the context of their role in PTSD diagnosis and understanding. Both pharmacological treatments and non-pharmacological interventions, including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), and mindfulness-based techniques, are reviewed for their effectiveness in symptom management. Further research is essential to advance individualized diagnostic techniques and optimize treatment strategies, ensuring more personalized care for PTSD patients.

Neuroticism and posttraumatic stress disorder: A Mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiological studies revealed an unestablished association between neuroticism and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and we conducted mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to examine whether neuroticism clusters of worry, depressed affect, and sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity (SESA) were involved in the development of PTSD.

METHOD

We obtained data on three neuroticism clusters, PTSD, and nine other psychiatric disorders from genome-wide association studies summary statistics and employed univariable, multivariable, and mediation MR analyses to explore causal associations among them.

RESULTS

Neuroticism clusters were linked with PTSD (depressed affect (odds ratio [OR]: 2.94 [95% confidence interval: 2.21-3.92]); SESA (2.69 [1.95-3.71]; worry (1.81 [1.37-2.99])). Neuroticism clusters were also associated with psychiatric disorders, with the depressed effect on panic disorder (PD) (2.60 [1.14-5.91]), SESA on anorexia nervosa (AN) (2.77 [1.95-3.94]) and schizophrenia (2.55 [1.99-3.25]), worry on major depressive disorder (MDD) (2.58 [2.19-3.05]). In multivariable MR, only the SESA-PTSD association remained (2.60 [2.096, 3.107]) while worry-PTSD and depressed affect-PTSD associations attenuated to nonsignificance. Mediation MR analyses suggested that PD mediated 3.76% of the effect of depressed effect on PTSD and AN mediated 10.33% of the effect of SESA on PTSD.

CONCLUSION

Delving deeper into neuroticism clusters, we comprehensively understand the role of neuroticism in PTSD.

Mental health burden following extreme weather events in South-east Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Exposure to extreme weatherly events potentially develops mental disorders among affected individuals.

Aim

To synthesize the burden of mental disorders following impact of extreme weather events in South-east Asian (SEA) countries.

Methods

Proposal was registered in PROSPERO register [CRD42023469788] and reported as per PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Studies reporting prevalence of mental health disorders following extreme weather events from SEA countries during 1990 and 2023 were searched on Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Study quality was assessed using Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Overall pooled prevalence was computed using DerSimonian-Laird method for random-effects model and reported as 95% confidence intervals.

Results

On screening 12,046 records, we included 155 studies (2,04,474 participants) for analysis. Overall burden of mental disorders was 35.31% (95%CI: 30.42%-40.21%). In subgroup analysis, studies on cyclones, India, local residents, children and adolescents, rural settings, and community settings reported higher burden of mental disorders. Depression (28.58%; 95%CI: 24.05%-33.1%) and PTSD (29.36%; 95%CI: 26.26%-32.46%) had similar prevalence. Visiting tourists to SEA region experienced fear, fear of recurrence of tsunami, nightmares, and sense of helplessness. Mental health outcomes were relatively higher in studies conducted within 1 year of events. Heterogeneity and possibility of publication bias exists among the reported studies.

Conclusion

With the significant rise in episodes of extreme weather events in SEA region over the last three decades, mental disorders are documented in different proportions. We suggest prioritizing well-informed policies to formulate inclusive and resilient strategies on effectively identifying and treating mental health concerns among victims of extreme weather events.

Association between housing damage, present bias and delayed-onset post-traumatic stress symptoms among older adults 9 years after a natural disaster

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that experience of natural disasters may heighten present bias. Research also suggests that impaired self-control (in particular, heightened present bias) could be linked to delayed-onset post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among survivors of natural disasters. We examined a hypothesis that the association between disaster experiences and delayed-onset PTSS is mediated through present bias among older survivors of the 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami.

METHODS

The baseline survey was conducted for older adults who lived in a city located 80 km west of the epicentre 7 months before the disaster. Approximately 2.5 and 8.5 years after the disaster, we surveyed older survivors to assess the trajectory of PTSS (2230 participants). We implemented analyses by three analytical groups: (1) resilient versus delayed-onset, (2) resilient versus improved and (3) resilient versus persistent.

RESULTS

Logistic regression models showed that major housing damage was linked to raised present bias in all analytical groups (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.04 to 5.87; OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.20 to 6.29; OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.10, respectively). The present bias, however, was significantly associated with only delayed-onset PTSS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.69). In the group of resilient versus delayed onset, housing destruction was also associated with delayed-onset PTSS (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11 to 5.37), and the association was attenuated by present bias (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Present bias could mediate the association between housing damage and delayed-onset PTSS among older survivors of a natural disaster.

Natural disasters and mental health

Natural disasters are large-scale adverse events resulting from natural processes of the earth, often associated with death, trauma, and destruction of property. They threaten harm or death to a large group of people; cause disruption of services and social networks and a communal loss of resources; and involve identifiable mental and physical health outcomes, among those affected. While majority of individuals who experience a traumatic event due to natural disasters do not develop psychopathology, natural disasters can threaten our psychological well-being in many ways and they can result in both short and long-term psychological distress and thus create a significant burden of mental health conditions on individuals and the community affected by them. In this paper we provide a narrative review that focuses on the mental health effects of natural disasters. We discuss effective, evidence-based interventions that can help enhance the sense of safety, hope, and optimism, as well as serve to promote social connectedness for those who are impacted. We describe how these interventions, developed by keeping in mind the cultural context and the needs of the community, can be provided pre, peri and post-disaster period to improve the adverse mental health effects of the disaster.