Response to sequential administration of clomipramine and lithium carbonate in treatment-resistant depression

Double-blind study of high-dose fluoxetine versus lithium or desipramine augmentation of fluoxetine in partial responders and nonresponders to fluoxetine

In a previous study, of 41 depressed patients who had not responded to fluoxetine 20 mg/day, 53% were treated with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/ day) and responded (i.e., their 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D-17] score was <7) versus 29% and 25% of patients treated with fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day) or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day), respectively. We wanted to assess whether these findings could be replicated in a larger sample of depressed outpatients. We identified 101 outpatients with major depressive disorder (52 men and 49 women; mean age, 41.6 + 10.6 years) who were either partial responders (n = 49) or nonresponders (n = 52) to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/ day. These patients were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/day), fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day), or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day). In the overall group of patients (N = 101), there was no significant difference in response rates across the three treatment groups (high-dose fluoxetine, 42.4%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 29.4%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 23.5%). Dropout rates were also comparable, ranging from 9.1% (high-dose fluoxetine) to 14.7% (fluoxetine plus desipramine and fluoxetine plus lithium). There were also no significant differences in response rates across the three treatment groups among partial responders (high-dose fluoxetine, 50.0%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 33.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 33.3%) and nonresponders (high-dose fluoxetine, 35.3%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 26.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 12.5%). At the end of the study, the mean lithium level was 0.37 + 0.15 mEq/L (n = 27; range, 0.1-0.8 mEq/L) among lithium-treated patients, and the mean desipramine level was 104.7 + 58.8 ng/mL (n = 22; range, 25-257 ng/mL). There were no significant relationships between lithium or desipramine blood levels and degree of improvement (as measured by the change in HAM-D-17 score). We found no significant differences in efficacy among these three treatment strategies among patients who had failed to respond adequately to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day, although the high-fluoxetine group was associated with nonsignificantly higher response rates in both partial responders and nonresponders.

Treatment-resistant depression: a survey of practice habits of Canadian psychiatrists

Treatment-resistant depression is a fascinating yet poorly defined condition. The various management strategies in use are a source of controversy. The objective of this survey was to determine how Canadian psychiatrists treat patients with "intractable depression." This information may be used to plan future research into the management of treatment-resistant depression. It may also provide information about the practices of Canadian psychiatrists and help direct residency training. Confidential questionnaires were mailed to all psychiatrists residing in Canada registered with the Canadian Psychiatric Association. Respondents indicated that 12.4% of their depressed patients were "resistant to treatment." Respondents were asked to rank a list of treatment choices in the order they would use them to treat patients with treatment-resistant depression. Ninety-five point eight percent of respondents used tricyclics as the first treatment of choice. Almost equal portions of respondents chose a second tricyclic, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) or a combination of lithium and tricyclics as their treatment of second choice.

Lithium als adjuvans bij een therapie-resistente depressie: een casus

Lithium was added to imipramine in case of a 55-year old depressed woman who didn't respond to imipramine alone. There was a clear improvement within a few days on 900 mg lithium carbonate a day (lithium plasmalevel 0.9 mmol/l). However when after two weeks the lithium dose was reduced to 600 mg a day (lithium plasmalevel 0.5 mmol/l), an almost immediate relapse followed. On resuming lithium in the old dose the depression disappeared again. After four weeks the second attempt at reducing and eventually stopping the lithium appeared to be successful. Half a year after cessation of lithium imipramine was also stopped. More than a year afterwards there hasn't been a depression again. In this case, after a fast potentiation of imipramine by lithium, a relapse followed when the lithium dose was reduced. It seems to be that even a high and successful starting dose of lithium needs to be continued for some time in order to prevent a relapse.

A case of obsessive-compulsive disorder related to AIDS: psychopharmacologic treatment

It is well known that delusions, obsessions and phobic reactions may centre on items which are of current topical interest. We report a case of obsessive-compulsive disorder manifested primarily by intrusive thoughts about AIDS. The patient eventually responded to an unusual combination of medications.

Alteration of cytochrome P-450 by prolonged administration of imipramine and/or lithium to rats

The aim of this study was to investigate imipramine-induced alterations of cytochrome P-450 and to determine whether prolonged concomitant administration of imipramine and lithium results in a pharmacokinetic interaction. Male Wistar rats received imipramine (10 mg/kg i.p.) at 12 h intervals or lithium chloride (100 mg/kg in drinking water) or they were treated with the combination of these drugs for 2 weeks. The long term treatment with imipramine produced a very complex alteration of cytochrome P-450: imipramine increased the level of the cytochrome, but it decreased the rate of its own aromatic hydroxylation in position 2. The rate of N-demethylation in the side chain was not changed. Consequently, in the case of both hydroxylation and demethylation, calculated molecular activities were decreased to 48% and 70% respectively. This differential change in activities corresponded well to the observed decrease of absorption in difference spectra (type I) produced in microsomes by imipramine. Carbamazepine-induced type I difference spectra were also decreased by imipramine pretreatment, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, hexobarbital type I binding was increased by imipramine treatment while type II difference spectra produced by metyrapone were not affected. The preliminary SDS-PAGE analysis of cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes of control and imipramine treated rats showed that the investigated antidepressant markedly intensified a protein band at 50.11 kD while bands at 51.28 kD, 56.20 kD and 56.88 kD were less intensive. These results indicate that the alteration of cytochrome P-450 by imipramine treatment is not only of quantitative but also of qualitative character. Lithium alone given to rats affected neither the concentration of cytochrome P-450 in microsomal protein nor the rate of imipramine metabolism in vitro. Lithium given jointly with imipramine reduced imipramine-induced elevation of cytochrome P-450.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

New applications of lithium therapy

Several placebo-controlled double-blind studies have indicated that lithium sometimes augments antidepressants, converting nonresponding patients to responders. Lithium therapy has also benefitted some schizoaffective patients and some alcoholics. Side effects are minimal. Mechanisms involved in lithium's effectiveness have not yet been discovered.

Effects of lithium on alterations of pharmacokinetics of imipramine and on the related changes of monoamines in rat brain

Rats were given chronically i.p. imipramine (20 mg/kg), LiCl (1 mg/kg) or both drugs to examine the effects of lithium (Li) on the alterations of imipramine pharmacokinetics in the whole brain and on the imipramine-related changes of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) levels in the brain. When rats were given Li for 3 days, followed by a single injection of imipramine, the concentrations of desipramine in the brain and serum were higher than those in the vehicle-treated rat, although the imipramine concentrations in both tissues did not differ in Li- and in vehicle-treated rats. In rats receiving both drugs for 10 days, the steady state levels of imipramine and desipramine in the brain were the same as those in the vehicle-treated rats but the steady state level of desipramine was reached earlier with Li treatments presumably because of the enhanced demethylation of imipramine. Consequently, the desipramine-dependent alterations of NE and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol levels in the brain appeared to be induced earlier and more markedly when Li was given simultaneously. As the 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) levels were elevated in the brains of Li-treated rats and reduced in brains of imipramine-treated rats as compared with the level in vehicle-treated rats, the 5-HIAA level in rats receiving both drugs was equivalent to that in vehicle-treated rats.

Lithium augmentation for treatment-resistant depression in the elderly

Lithium has been used successfully to enhance the effectiveness of tricyclic and other antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and combinations of antipsychotics and antidepressants. The safety and efficacy of adding lithium to the treatment regimen was examined in 14 elderly patients with refractory depression. Seven of the 14 had a complete recovery, and three showed a partial response. Side effects, including peripheral weakness, severe fine tremor, and neurotoxicity, necessitated the discontinuation of lithium in three patients. In two other patients with side effects, lower dosages of lithium relieved their symptoms. Lithium augmentation appears to be a promising treatment for geriatric depressed patients who are unresponsive to or cannot tolerate other standard therapies.

Clomipramine, tryptophan and lithium in combination for resistant endogenous depression: seven case studies

Seven patients suffering from severe endogenous depression who had proven resistant to lengthy trials of treatment with tricyclic and other antidepressants are described. Their successful treatment with a combination of clomipramine, L-tryptophan and lithium is discussed in the context of other strategies for the treatment of resistant depression.