An alternative to interruption of treatment in recurrent clozapine-induced severe neutropenia

Clozapine rechallenge or continuation despite neutropenia or agranulocytosis using colony-stimulating factor: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Rechallenge/continuation of clozapine in association with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) following neutropenia/agranulocytosis has been reported, but many questions remain unanswered about efficacy and safety. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of rechallenging/continuing clozapine in patients following neutropenia/agranulocytosis using CSFs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception date to July 31, 2022. Articles screening and data extraction were realized independently by two reviewers, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 systematic review guidance. Included articles had to report on at least one case where clozapine was rechallenged/continued using CSFs despite previous neutropenia/agranulocytosis.

RESULTS

Eight hundred forty articles were retrieved; 34 articles met the inclusion criteria, totaling 59 individual cases. Clozapine was successfully rechallenged/continued in 76% of patients for an average follow-up period of 1.9 years. There was a trend toward better efficacy reported in case reports/series, compared with consecutive case series (overall success rates of 84% and 60%, respectively, p-value = 0.065). Two administration strategies were identified, "as-needed" and prophylactic, both yielding similar success rates (81% and 80%, respectively). Only mild and transient adverse events were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited by the relatively small number of published cases, factors such as time of onset to first neutropenia and severity of the episode did not seem to impact the outcome of a subsequent clozapine rechallenge using CSFs. While the efficacy of this strategy remains to be further adequately evaluated in more rigorous study designs, its long-term innocuity warrants considering its use more proactively in the management of clozapine hematological adverse events as to maintain this treatment for as many individuals as possible.

Utilization of G-CSF and GM-CSF as an alternative to discontinuation in clozapine-induced neutropenia or leukopenia: A case report and discussion

Clozapine remains the definitive gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia despite limitations in use because of hematological abnormalities. Neutropenia or leukopenia are often treated with interruption of clozapine treatment, frequently resulting in clinical decompensation, hospitalization, increased burden to patient care, and increased risk of suicide. Colony-stimulating factors, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors, are cytokines that stimulate proliferation and differentiation of myeloid precursor cells. Their use in the prevention and treatment of clozapine-associated neutropenia presents an alternative to clozapine discontinuation in certain cases. We present a case report of successful periodic granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor use with clozapine in a patient with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, as well as discussion of a practical approach to patients with possible clozapine-induced neutropenia or leukopenia.

The Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Clozapine Rechallenge: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Clozapine is associated with hematological abnormalities, with neutropenia and agranulocytosis of most concern. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used to support clozapine rechallenge after neutropenia with the aim of maintaining the neutrophil count. This study aims to explore the practice, use, safety, and efficacy of G-CSF in this context.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

We conducted a systematic review to identify all studies investigating or describing G-CSF as a prophylaxis to enable continued clozapine treatment during a rechallenge.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

We identified 32 reports of patients who received G-CSF either regularly (n = 23) or as required (n = 9) to support clozapine rechallenge after an episode of neutropenia necessitating discontinuation of clozapine. Seventy-five percent (n = 24) of published cases remained on clozapine with the use of continual prophylactic G-CSF or after single G-CSF administrations (n = 8). Seventy percent (n = 16) of patients in receipt of continual prophylactic G-CSF were successfully maintained on clozapine. However, 1 of the 3 episodes of rechallenge in those with a history of severe agranulocytosis (absolute neutrophil count <0.1 × 10/L) had a recurrence of agranulocytosis at week 9.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that G-CSF can sometimes be safely used to support the maintenance of normal neutrophil counts and clozapine use after neutropenia. Publication bias is an important limitation, however. Also, few reports clearly documented the presence or absence of an independent nonclozapine cause of the index neutropenia, which may have increased success rates. Furthermore, adverse events were not systematically recorded. Prospective studies are needed to determine safety because if agranulocytosis occurs on clozapine while supported by G-CSF, there is no obvious alternate rescue therapy to promote granulopoiesis. From the available data, it is not possible to recommend this course of action for someone with a true clozapine agranulocytosis.

Use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to prevent recurrent clozapine-induced neutropenia on drug rechallenge: A systematic review of the literature and clinical recommendations

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia; however, its use is contraindicated in people who have had previous clozapine-induced neutropenia. Co-prescription of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor may prevent recurrent neutropenia and allow continuation or rechallenge of clozapine.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

Systematic review of literature reporting the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to allow rechallenge or continuation of clozapine in people with previous episodes of clozapine-induced neutropenia. The efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and predictors of successful rechallenge will be determined to elucidate whether evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in this context.

RESULTS

A total of 17 articles were identified that reported on clozapine rechallenge with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support. In all, 76% of cases were able to continue clozapine at median follow-up of 12 months. There were no clear clinical or laboratory predictors of successful rechallenge; however, initial neutropenia was more severe in successful cases compared to unsuccessful cases. Cases co-prescribed lithium had lower success rates of rechallenge (60%) compared to those who were not prescribed lithium (81%). The most commonly reported rechallenge strategy was use of filgrastim 150-480 µg between daily to three times a week. There were no medication-specific side effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor reported apart from euphoria in one case. Three cases who failed granulocyte-colony stimulating factor had bacterial infection at time of recurrent neutropenia. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary data suggest granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is safe and effective in facilitating rechallenge with clozapine. Clinical recommendations for use are discussed.

[Clozapine rechallenge after neutropenia in resistant schizophrenia: A review]

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic known for its efficacy in refractory schizophrenia. One of the adverse effects is neutropenia. This dysplasia is a rare but major side effect which leads to a discontinuation and constitutes further contraindication. Thereafter, therapeutic options decrease dramatically. Mechanisms involved are not well known at this time and can be combined. A toxic hypothesis may be more likely than an immune-allergic one.

METHODS

We have reviewed publications on Medline describing procedures that allowed clozapine rechallenge after blood dyscrasia in refractory schizophrenia. Three different procedures were found: simple rechallenge, rechallenge with lithium and rechallenge with Granulocyte - colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Rechallenge could be simple or multiple.

RESULTS

These past years, clozapine have been rechallenged successfully after neutropenia thanks to different procedures, the different options being simple rechallenge, rechallenge with lithium and/or rechallenge with G-CSF. Lithium as G-CSF are used to increase neutrophil blood rate and prevent neutropenia recurrence after clozapine rechallenge. G-CSF was first used within the context of chemotherapy and extends now to clozapine-induced neutropenia. Both for lithium and G-CSF, numerous procedures are reviewed and cannot be compared.

DISCUSSION

Publications are limited but increasing, and they point out that a careful rechallenge can be successful. However, interesting data can be extracted. First, clozapine is more likely to be incriminated in neutropenia when patients receive many drugs, but a careful study could prevent some discontinuation. Indeed, other drugs or a hematologic disease could be involved. Moreover, several contributing factors have been found such as HLA group and drug interaction. Ethnic origin also affects neutrophil rate. That is why, in Great Britain, a subgroup of patients "benign ethnic neutropenia" has been introduced to enlarge threshold and allow these patients to access clozapine despite lower blood counts. Then, rechallenge choice has to be done on a case-by-case basis and only after considering the benefits and risks of such a treatment. Most of the time, clinical advice of rechallenge arises from the inefficiency of other antipsychotics and even sismotherapy failure. Patients and sometimes families have to be informed and give their consent. Preventive measures have been found such as taking a hematologic recommendation and doing twice-a-week blood sample monitoring. With regards lithium and G-CSF, some efficient doses are assumed (lithium: 0,4-1,1 mEq/L and G-CSF>0,3 mg/week). Lithium as G-CSF may have other adverse effects which need to be considered. There is no successful rechallenge reported after agranulocytosis. Some publications highlight that if neutropenia occurs on rechallenge, it will do so more quickly and more severe than at the time of initial trial of clozapine.

CONCLUSION

There is emerging evidence of successful clozapine rechallenging. However, further investigations are required as randomized controlled trials to reassess guidelines and establish the safety and effectiveness of the different procedures. Because of the practical and ethical difficulties of designing such studies, referral hospitals could be elected, and common background writing proposed in order to ease data comparison.

Clozapine treatment of refractory schizophrenia during essential chemotherapy: a case study and mini review of a clinical dilemma

BACKGROUND

Clozapine remains the antipsychotic of choice for refractory schizophrenia. Given the particular side effects of clozapine including neutropenia and myelosuppression, safety and efficacy of add-on chemotherapy for patients who are already under clozapine treatment remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We present evidence from a patient with a diagnosis of refractory schizophrenia on clozapine medication, who required essential chemotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We have also reviewed literature regarding this challenging clinical dilemma.

METHOD

We report details about a patient with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who was given chemotherapy (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab) for CLL in the course of concomitant treatment with clozapine and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSFs). In addition, we have reviewed literature using the PUBMED data base.

RESULTS

Current evidence remains insufficient to provide authoritative guide to clinicians regarding the efficacy and safety of the combined use of clozapine and chemotherapy. However, general conclusion from our case and of the published evidence is that a combination of clozapine use and chemotherapeutic agents do not cause additional hematological worsening with no decreasing efficacy concerns raised.

CONCLUSION

Continuing with clozapine in the course of chemotherapy may be relatively safer for patients who responded well to clozapine concomitant with G-CSF treatment.

Continuing clozapine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with neutropenia

BACKGROUND

The current guidelines dictate that clozapine should be stopped following the emergence of neutropenia. Various alternative approaches have been tried in the past, among them one rarely used alternative being to continue treatment with clozapine with coprescription of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF).

AIM AND METHOD

In this case series we aim to describe the treatment and progress of a number of patients in a secure psychiatric hospital in the UK. These patients were restarted on clozapine in combination with G-CSF, in spite of previous neutropenia associated with clozapine treatment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We hope that this case series will raise the profile of a potentially effective alternative to discontinuing clozapine after neutropenia.

Add-on filgrastim during clozapine rechallenge unsuccessful in preventing agranulocytosis

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor agents such as filgrastim can be administered in order to reduce the duration of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Successful long-term combination treatment with filgrastim and clozapine in patients with previous clozapine-induced agranulocytosis has been described in several cases. We describe a patient with schizophrenia who developed agranulocytosis during treatment with clozapine and who did not respond to other antipsychotics. Add-on treatment with filgrastim during a clozapine rechallenge did not prevent the reoccurrence of agranulocytosis, and clozapine treatment had to be discontinued. Our case suggests that add-on filgrastim is a therapeutic option when clozapine is rechallenged, but physicians should be aware of the potential dangers especially severe clozapine-induced agranulocytosis.

Clozapine: key discussion points for prescribers

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia and is also approved for suicidality in schizophrenia patients. However, it can cause significant medical morbidity and requires intensive medical monitoring once prescribed. Perhaps due to lack of familiarity with its use, it is underused in clinical practice and its initiation often delayed. This article reviews the literature on clozapine in order to measure its potential effectiveness against its adverse effects and ultimately aims to serve as a useful summary for clinicians in their everyday prescribing.

Optimizing clozapine treatment

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine treatment remains the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but treatment with clozapine is associated with several side-effects that complicate the use of the drug. This clinical overview aims to provide psychiatrists with knowledge about how to optimize clozapine treatment. Relevant strategies for reducing side-effects and increasing the likelihood of response are discussed.

METHOD

Studies of clozapine available in MEDLINE were reviewed.

RESULTS

A slow up-titration of clozapine is recommended in order to reach the optimal dosage of clozapine and diminish the risk of dose-dependent side-effects. Particularly, in case of partial response or non-response, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine is recommended. Plasma levels above the therapeutic threshold of 350-420 ng/ml are necessary to determine non-response to clozapine. To ease the burden of dose-dependent side-effects, dose reduction of clozapine should be tried and combination with another antipsychotic drug may facilitate further dose reduction. For most side-effects, counteracting medication exists. Augmentation with lamotrigine, antipsychotics, or electroconvulsive therapy may be beneficial in case of partial response to clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with clozapine should be optimized in order to increase the rate of response and to minimize side-effects, thus diminishing the risk of discontinuation and psychotic relapse.

Failure of filgrastim to prevent severe clozapine-induced agranulocytosis

Although a highly effective medication, the usage of clozapine is limited mostly by its 2.7% incidence of neutropenia. It is often a treatment of last resort for patients with severe psychiatric illnesses, and therefore often the only medication to which a patient has responded. There has thus been a great deal of interest in ways to continue the medication in spite of emergent blood dyscrasias. There have been several reports documenting the successful continuation of clozapine in spite of neutropenia by adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim. This strategy was unsuccessful for a 63-year-old man, resulting in severe, prolonged agranulocytosis. Although a promising strategy for such refractory patients, its inherent dangers should not be underestimated.

Haematological toxicity of drugs used in psychiatry

Almost all classes of psychotropic agents have been reported to cause blood dyscrasias. Mechanisms include direct toxic effects upon the bone marrow, the formation of antibodies against haematopoietic precursors or involve peripheral destruction of cells. Agranulocytosis is probably the most important drug-related blood dyscrasia. The mortality from drug-induced agranulocytosis is 5-10% in Western countries. The manifestations of agranulocytosis are secondary to infection. Aggressive treatment with intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobials and bone marrow stimulants may be required. Of drugs encountered in psychiatry, antipsychotics including clozapine (risk of agranulocytosis approximately 0.8%, predominantly in the first year of treatment) and phenothiazines (chlorpromazine agranulocytosis risk approximately 0.13%), and antiepileptics (notably carbamazepine, neutropenia risk approximately 0.5%) are the most common causes of drug-related neutropenia/agranulocytosis. Drugs known to cause neutropenia should not be used concomitantly with other drugs known to cause this problem. High temperature and other indicators of possible infection should be looked for routinely during treatment. Clozapine is well known as a drug that can cause blood dyscrasias, but olanzapine and other atypicals may also cause similar problems. In addition to genetic factors, there are likely to be dose-related and immunological components to these phenomena. Important lessons have been learnt from the haematological monitoring that is necessary with clozapine and the monitoring has been very successful in preventing deaths related to clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Continuing research into the mechanisms of drug-induced neutropenia and agranulocytosis may serve to further enhance the safe use not only of clozapine, but also of other agents.

Restarting clozapine after neutropenia: evaluating the possibilities and practicalities

Clozapine remains the antipsychotic of choice for refractory schizophrenia despite its propensity for serious blood disorders. When neutropenia or agranulocytosis occur in people taking clozapine, cessation of treatment is mandated and relapse often results. Because such patients are usually unresponsive to other antipsychotics, many clinicians consider restarting clozapine, despite the risks involved. However, the risks of clozapine rechallenge vary according to the cause and nature of the blood dyscrasia. Neutropenia can arise because of factors unrelated or indirectly related to clozapine treatment. These include benign ethnic neutropenia, concomitant drug therapy, co-existing medical conditions and drug interactions. In such cases, clozapine may be restarted if non-clozapine causes of neutropenia are identified and eliminated, although concurrent treatment with lithium (to induce leukocytosis) is sometimes necessary. Close monitoring of the patient is essential because it is rarely possible to completely rule out the contribution of clozapine to the blood dyscrasia and because lithium does not protect against clozapine-related agranulocytosis. In cases of clozapine-induced neutropenia (as distinct from agranulocytosis, which may have a different pathology) rechallenge may also be considered and, again, lithium co-therapy may be required. Where clozapine is clearly the cause of agranulocytosis, rechallenge should not be considered or undertaken unless there are very exceptional circumstances (severe and prolonged relapse following clozapine discontinuation). In these cases, re-exposure to clozapine may rarely be attempted where there are facilities for very close and frequent monitoring. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is likely to be required as co-therapy, given the very high likelihood of recurrence. Uncertainty over the likely cause of blood dyscrasia in people taking clozapine, coupled with uncertainty over the mechanism by which clozapine causes both neutropenia and agranulocytosis, makes any attempt to restart clozapine a high-risk venture requiring the utmost caution.

Monitoring the safe use of clozapine: a consensus view from Victoria, Australia

Clozapine is an important antipsychotic agent that has a unique profile of clinical benefits, but that has also been associated with several serious and potentially life-threatening safety concerns. In order to minimise the impact of haematological adverse events, health professionals treating patients with clozapine are currently required to register their patients on a centrally administered data network and to conform to strict protocols. The consensus statement documented in this article extends existing protocols by recommending monitoring of patients treated with clozapine for additional adverse effects during treatment. This consensus statement reflects the current practice at five major public psychiatric hospitals in Victoria, Australia, for the monitoring and management of clozapine-related adverse events, and has been implemented at these sites because of emerging safety concerns associating clozapine with cardiovascular and metabolic adverse effects.

Continuing clozapine treatment despite neutropenia

RATIONALE

Approximately 1-2% of patients treated with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine develop severe neutropenia and agranulocytosis. The usual recommendation is to discontinue treatment with the drug when the peripheral neutrophil count drops below 1,500/mm3.

METHODS

We have reviewed several reports describing procedures that allowed the patients to continue clozapine treatment despite the occurrence of these haematological side effects.

RESULTS

The therapeutic procedures described (symptomatic treatment of neutropenia by co-administration of lithium or granulopoiesis-stimulating factors, management of the adjunctive medication) seem to be efficient strategies that allow continuation of clozapine treatment despite the occurrence of neutropenia. However, these types of therapy have only been used in a limited number of cases, and the evidence supporting their use remains anecdotal.

CONCLUSION

Although the procedures adopted in the cases described in this review are uncommon, they potentially provide an alternative to the discontinuation of clozapine treatment in patients with complex symptomatologies for whom treatment with other antipsychotic medication is insufficient.

Long-term combination treatment with clozapine and filgrastim in patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis

Short-term treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has been successful in reducing the duration of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. Long-term combination treatment with filgrastim and clozapine in patients with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis has only been described in two previous cases. We describe three patients with schizophrenia who developed granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis during treatment with clozapine and who did not respond to other antipsychotics. The patients received long-term combination treatment with clozapine and filgrastim. Using a combination treatment with filgrastim and clozapine, the psychotic symptoms were successfully controlled and no haematological complications were observed during the follow-up periods of 11, 30 and 48 months, respectively. Our cases suggest that long-term treatment with filgrastim might be a useful, but exceptional, treatment approach in patients who have developed clozapine-induced granulocytopenia or agranulocytosis.