Postcode prescribing in psychiatry

An evaluation of the variation and underuse of clozapine in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the only licensed treatment for treatment refractory schizophrenia. Despite this, it remains grossly underused relative to the prevalence of refractory schizophrenia. The extent of underuse and the degree of regional variation in prescribing in the United Kingdom is unknown. It is also unclear, how the UK compares with other European countries in rates of clozapine prescribing.

METHODS

We obtained data relating to all clozapine prescribing in the UK from the relevant clozapine registries. We examined regional variation in clozapine use across England, corrected for the known prevalence of severe mental illness (SMI). We also compared the UK rate of clozapine use per 100,000 population to that described in other European countries.

FINDINGS

There is substantial variation in clozapine prescribing across different regions of England and only about a third of potentially eligible patients were prescribed the drug in the UK. Clozapine prescribing rate in the UK was lower than in several European countries.

INTERPRETATION

There is clear regional inequity in access to the most effective treatment in refractory schizophrenia in England. Strategies to increase clozapine use, by overcoming both real and perceived barriers, are urgently necessary to reduce treatment inequity for patients with refractory schizophrenia.

Prescriber and institutional barriers and facilitators of clozapine use: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

As clozapine is under-prescribed in persons with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), it is necessary to better identify the determinants of health inequalities in access to clozapine use.

OBJECTIVE

To identify mental health professionals' characteristics or attitudes and institutional characteristics facilitating or limiting clozapine prescribing.

METHOD

We systematically searched multiple electronic databases for articles reporting: (i) mental health professionals' attitudes and characteristics favoring or limiting clozapine prescribing; (ii) institutional characteristics associated with variations in clozapine prescribing; (iii) interventions aimed at enhancing clozapine prescribing. Data were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles reporting findings of 29 studies published from 1993 to 2017 in 11 countries fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The main prescriber-related barriers to clozapine prescribing are lack of personal prescribing experience and concern with pharmacological characteristics of clozapine (blood monitoring and adverse effects). Lack of knowledge about the effectiveness of clozapine does not appear as a major determinant of under-prescription. Institutional-related characteristics favoring clozapine prescribing are prescribers' adherence to evidence-based medicine principles and learning by modelling from experienced clozapine prescribers.

CONCLUSION

Effective strategies to increase access to clozapine in persons with TRS include implementation of integrated clozapine clinics, simplification of blood monitoring, education for prescribers and contact with experienced prescribers. Programs addressing barriers in clozapine prescription need to be disseminated more broadly to ensure persons with TRS have access to evidenced based treatments such as clozapine. Inequality in access to clozapine care should be more systematically handled by mental health facilities and health regulatory agencies.

Continuation of clozapine treatment: practice makes perfect

Aims and Method

The study aimed to identify the predictors of drop-out from clozapine treatment by examining the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients registered on clozapine within a 6-month period in one NHS Trust.

Results

During the study period, 54 patients were registered and began clozapine treatment and 31% had discontinued within 6 months. Two people died and the remainder discontinued because of non-compliance or side-effects, including neutropenia. Two factors were predictive: the age of the patient (older patients were more likely to discontinue) and the hospital where the initial registration was made.

Clinical Implications

Neither ethnicity, previous registration nor the individual prescriber are a bar to successful persistence with clozapine. However, one set of hospitals with a history of evidence-based practice and high clozapine prescribing was more successful in retaining patients on maintenance treatment. Although specific data are needed to identify more subtle contributing factors to continuation, it is clear that there is scope for improving the rate of persistence with clozapine treatment.

Continuation of clozapine treatment: practice makes perfect

Aims and Method

The study aimed to identify the predictors of drop-out from clozapine treatment by examining the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients registered on clozapine within a 6-month period in one NHS Trust.

Results

During the study period, 54 patients were registered and began clozapine treatment and 31% had discontinued within 6 months. Two people died and the remainder discontinued because of non-compliance or side-effects, including neutropenia. Two factors were predictive: the age of the patient (older patients were more likely to discontinue) and the hospital where the initial registration was made.

Clinical Implications

Neither ethnicity, previous registration nor the individual prescriber are a bar to successful persistence with clozapine. However, one set of hospitals with a history of evidence-based practice and high clozapine prescribing was more successful in retaining patients on maintenance treatment. Although specific data are needed to identify more subtle contributing factors to continuation, it is clear that there is scope for improving the rate of persistence with clozapine treatment.

Clozapine: national review of postcode prescribing

Aims and Method

We review the prescribing rates for clozapine among all mental health trusts in England and explore whether it has changed with the introduction of NICE guidelines, generic clozapine and the Healthcare Commission ratings. Data were collected from mental health trusts in 2005–2006 and compared with a previous study from 2000. Mental health star ratings of 2004–2005 were taken from the Healthcare Commission.

Results

We found a reduced inter-trust variability from 34-fold variation in 2000 to 5-fold variation in 2005–2006. There was a significant inverse relationship between star rating and clozapine prescribing.

Clinical Implications

NICE guidelines and generic clozapine seem to have improved access to gold standard therapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Star ratings have little bearing on the implementation of NICE guidelines.

Underuse of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Up to a third of patients with schizophrenia develop treatment resistance. Clozapine has been established as the most effective antipsychotic medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it is significantly underutilised in this population. Possible reasons include clinicians' lack of experience with the drug and negative attitudes towards it. African-Caribbean patients are less likely to be treated with clozapine compared with their White counterparts and more likely to have treatment discontinued due to perceived risk of agranulocytosis. This paper discusses the current evidence relating to the underuse of clozapine and factors responsible for this.

Practitioner attitudes to clozapine initiation

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is recommended as third-line treatment for schizophrenia in national and local guidelines. Despite this, it is underutilised. This survey aimed to clarify barriers to prescribing and elucidate factors that may improve patient access to clozapine.

METHOD

A questionnaire was made available to all staff members at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

RESULTS

In total, 144 clinical staff completed the questionnaire. The majority (81%) of respondents were 'fairly' or 'very' familiar with clozapine prescribing guidelines. Barriers to prescribing most commonly stated as being 'very frequently' a problem were patient concerns about tolerability of clozapine or patient refusal to adhere to blood test monitoring. Staff members also felt medical complications frequently prevented clozapine prescription. Dedicated staff or day hospital placements devoted to clozapine initiation were identified as factors most likely to increase prescribing of clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Professionals identified the dominant barriers to prescribing as being patient focussed - refusal of blood test monitoring or concerns about tolerability. Clinician fears about compliance or medical complications were also important. The development of out-patient services specifically tasked with initiating clozapine may help to increase the frequency of prescribing of clozapine earlier in treatment than is currently seen.

Psychiatrists' attitude towards and knowledge of clozapine treatment

Clozapine is, in most countries, underutilized and the initiation of clozapine is often delayed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reasons for the delay and the underutilization of clozapine. One hundred psychiatrists were interviewed by phone. The interview was a structured interview with questions regarding attitude to, knowledge of and experiences with clozapine. Forty-eight (48%) psychiatrists had treatment responsibility of fewer than five patients treated with clozapine and 31 of the interviewed psychiatrists (31%) had started clozapine within the last 3 months. Seven psychiatrists (7%) had never prescribed clozapine despite the fact that they had been working more than five years in general psychiatry. Sixty-four psychiatrists (64%) would rather combine two antipsychotics than use clozapine. Sixty-six psychiatrists (66%) believed that patients treated with clozapine were less satisfied with their treatment when compared with those treated with other atypical antipsychotics. Many psychiatrists are reluctant to use clozapine and this might be due to less experience and knowledge of clozapine. A reason for the low awareness of clozapine's properties might be that clozapine is now a generic drug, and therefore, the marketing and education in using the drug is sparse.

Economic issues in access to medications: schizophrenia treatment in England

Mental health problems and the services to address them are currently receiving more attention in the UK than ever. Mental health care in England--indeed, across the UK--is experiencing a much needed transformation. It is therefore highly pertinent to examine the patterns of psychotropic medication use, given their intended links to recovery, rehabilitation, and reintegration, as well as to explore the economic and other factors that appear to influence those patterns. These are the aims of this paper. Our attention will be primarily focused on England. What this analysis shows is that given a higher profile by government, including additional funding (although not really benefiting differentially compared to other parts of the health service) and the first national service framework, it is possible to see changes in service patterns, access and (to a degree) outcomes. These changes are occurring at a time when new classes of psychotropic medication are being introduced in a range of therapeutic areas, contributing to the relatively rapid growth of take-up but also raising questions about appropriateness, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and equity.

Variations in prescribing atypical antipsychotic drugs in primary care: cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Side-effects from conventional antipsychotic drugs, in particular extrapyramidal side-effects, limit their use for some patients, lead to non-compliance and may adversely affect the quality of life of others. Newer, more expensive, 'atypical' antipsychotics have been developed in attempts to address these problems, although debate about the most appropriate role for these medications remains.

OBJECTIVES

To examine variations in prescribing of the 'atypical' antipsychotics in primary care, over a 5-year period.

SETTING

All 13 health authorities within the West Midlands region.

METHOD

Cross-sectional analysis of prescribing analysis and cost (PACT) data for atypical antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, sertindole, and zotepine) was performed using one-way analysis of variance. To test whether the differences reflected variation in local population need, the prescribing data were adjusted using Mental Illness Needs Index scores. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the overall levels of prescribing and local population need.

RESULTS

The total volume of prescribing of atypical antipsychotic drugs in primary care increased nearly six-fold from 1996/97 to 2000/01 in the West Midlands region. Olanzapine was the most commonly prescribed drug during 1999/2000, accounting for 45% of defined daily doses, while risperidone accounted for 38% of the total. In 1996/97, a four-fold variation in rates of atypical antipsychotic prescribing between health authorities was found, compared with a three-fold variation in 2000/01, after adjusting for measures of local population need.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a substantial increase in the prescription of atypical antipsychotics in primary care over the last 5 years, but the rate of increase has varied widely between health authorities. Further studies are needed to determine the factors that have led to these differences in uptake, and the likely impact of national guidance on future prescribing patterns.

The cost-effectiveness of clozapine: a controlled, population-based, mirror-image study

A retrospective cohort study, with a mirror-image design, was used to measure inpatient service utilization in 63 consecutive patients started on clozapine from a geographical catchment area compared to a control group matched for previous inpatient service use. An intent-to-treat analysis, including those patients (n = 28) who discontinued clozapine during the study period, showed a significant reduction in number of admissions and total time spent in hospital in the 2 years following clozapine initiation compared to the previous 2 years and to the follow-up period in the control group. This translated into a reduction of 7,300 pounds in hospitalization costs per patient started on clozapine, over the 2-year period. In those patients who continued clozapine treatment for the whole of the 2-year period, there was a two-thirds reduction in number of admissions and total time spent in hospital compared to no change in the clozapine discontinuers. These findings suggest that clozapine is a clinically and cost-effective intervention for severe schizophrenia in routine clinical settings.