Managing the stiff elbow: operative, nonoperative, and postoperative techniques

Rehabilitation after surgical release of the stiff elbow: A literature review

Background

Elbow stiffness poses a significant challenge for surgeons as well as physiotherapists during and after surgery. To date, there is no consensus regarding the subsequent rehabilitation after surgical release of the stiff elbow.

Objective

The aim is to evaluate the most important therapeutic strategies following open or arthroscopic release of the stiff elbow based on a comprehensive literature review, and to develop a consensus for or against specific therapeutic methods with the help of a survey among elbow experts of the D-A-CH Association for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (DVSE).

Methods

Literature search was performed based on guidelines, the "health technology assessments", systematic reviews and clinical studies that examined rehabilitation after osteocapsular release of the stiff elbow. The databases of the "Guidelines International Network", various national guidelines, PubMed, the "Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials", the "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews", and the "Physiotherapy Evidence Database" were scanned, each for the period from January 1989 to December 2019. As part of an online survey, all active members of the DVSE were asked about their strategies in immediate aftercare and rehabilitation after elbow arthrolysis.

Results

A total of 5 reviews and 55 articles could be identified from 107 articles since 1989, which served as the basis for the preparation of an evidence-based aftercare recommendation. By reviewing all the mentioned paper and evaluation of the survery of DVSE members, a basic concept could be finalized.

Does tranexamic acid reduce elbow swelling and improve early function following arthroscopic arthrolysis? A double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding and hematoma rates in open elbow arthrolysis. However, its effects on arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of TXA on elbow arthroscopic procedures and compare bleeding volume, hemarthrosis, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) in the early postoperative period between patients who received intra-articular TXA and those who did not.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolling 80 patients with stiff elbows who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed from January 2021 to December 2022. Intra-articularly, 1 g of TXA in 100 ml of saline or placebo (control group) was administered after the arthroscopic operation according to randomization. Parameters were recorded and compared between the groups, including bleeding volume of drainage, hemoglobin (Hgb) level, ratio of arm and forearm circumference of the surgical side to the contralateral side, grading of hematoma, VAS, ROM, and MEPS within 1 week postoperatively. And during 1 year follow-up, ROM and MEPS were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients enrolled in this study demonstrated significant improvements in ROM (flexion-extension) and MEPS 1 week postoperatively, with no significant differences observed between the 2 groups. Compared to the control group, the TXA group exhibited significant differences in the bleeding volume of drainage (61.45 ± 47.7 ml vs. 89.8 ± 47.0 ml, P = .030) and a higher Hgb level 24 hours postoperatively (13.5 ± 1.5 g/dL vs. 12.6 ± 1.8 g/dL P = .049). While the ratio of arm and forearm circumferences significantly increased 24 hours postoperatively compared to preoperative values in TXA group (1.05 ± 0.06 vs. 1.02 ± 0.04 and 1.02 ± 0.06 vs. 0.98 ± 0.04, with P = .019 and P = .005, respectively), this difference vanished 1 week postoperatively for the ratio of arm circumference. However, it persisted for the ratio of forearm circumference (1.02 ± 0.07 vs. 0.98 ± 0.04, P = .003). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in MEPS, VAS, or ROM between the 2 groups 1 week postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with stiff elbows who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes very early postoperatively. Compared to the control group, patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis with intra-articular administration of TXA exhibited significantly less bleeding volume of drainage and slightly higher Hgb levels postoperatively. One week postoperatively, slightly more swelling in the upper arm region was noted in the control group compared to the TXA group. These findings suggest that the intra-articular injection of TXA after arthroscopic release for elbow stiffness may statistically reduce complications related to postoperative bleeding. However, it's clinical relevance needs further investigation.

The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial

Background

Restoration of full elbow extension following trauma is difficult and influenced by the injury profile, surgeon preference, patient and environmental factors. The literature suggests that orthotic interventions are effective in improving contractures when movement plateaus despite normal therapeutic interventions. It is not known if extension orthotic intervention is more superior to standard treatment regardless of when it is commenced. The literature lacks patient-reported considerations to contracture management using elbow orthoses.

Methods and analysis

This protocol describes a Phase II double blinded randomised controlled feasibility trial (RCT) and mixed methods study, aimed to examine outcome with extension in an orthotic intervention group (OG) versus control (CG). All participants will undergo six weekly therapy sessions, which include a standardised therapeutic program. OG participants will be provided with an additional extension orthosis and the outcome is assessed according to the change in elbow extension motion after 6 weeks of intervention. Data will be collected via questionnaires, logbooks, feedback forms, and semi-structured interviews at baseline and final assessments for descriptive statistical analysis. Under the guidance of a statistician, all quantitative data will be evaluated using the appropriate parametric or non-parametric analyses to evaluate for systematic differences between groups. Preliminary extension gains are used to determine the final sample size required to achieve adequate power for a full-scaled RCT. Interview data on OG participants will be qualitatively analysed using the "five-factorial dimensions of adherence" framework to identify key differences in the influencers between adherent or non-adherent groups.

Trial registration number

ANZCTR ACTRN12619001402134p.

The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version

The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score (SHEDS) is a self-reported assessment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness that measures elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities. This study aimed to (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the SHEDS into Turkish and (2) investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the SHEDS (SHEDS-T) were tested in 108 patients (72 male; mean age, 43.2 ± 11.2 years) with post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficients were used to estimate test-retest. Construct validity was analyzed with the Turkish version of the Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and the Short Form-12 (PCS-12 and MCS-12). The SHEDS-T showed sufficient internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient = 0.83) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .96). The correlation coefficients between the SHEDS-T, the DASH, and the MEPS were .75 and .54, respectively (p < .001). There was a moderate correlation between the SHEDS-T and PCS-12 (r = .65, p = .01) and a weak positive correlation between the SHEDS and the MCS-12 (r = .40, p = .03). The SHEDS-T has sufficient reliability and validity to measure elbow-related symptoms and elbow motion capacities for Turkish-speaking individuals with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Early referral to multidisciplinary specialty centers to optimize outcomes in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy

AIM

To demonstrate the trajectory of long-term recovery of upper-extremity movement and determine optimal timing of evaluation at multidisciplinary specialty centers in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP).

METHOD

All children with conservatively managed NBPP seen at one institution from 2005 to 2020 were considered for inclusion. The cohort was divided according to age at formal evaluation (≤30 or > 30 days). Active range of motion (AROM) for shoulder and elbow movements collected at each appointment were compared in local age windows between early and late cohorts. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing was used to demonstrate the trajectory of recovery for the overall cohort.

RESULTS

More than 13 000 prospectively collected data points for 429 children (220 males, 209 females) were analysed. Elbow flexion improved to nearly full AROM for both groups over the course of the study. Shoulder abduction, forward flexion and external rotation, and forearm supination improved for the entire cohort, although greater absolute improvement, particularly at the shoulder, was seen in the early cohort (age at formal evaluation ≤30 days). AROM for elbow extension remained roughly stable for the early cohort but decreased for the late cohort (age at formal evaluation >30 days). AROM for forearm pronation decreased over time for both cohorts.

INTERPRETATION

Our data demonstrate good long-term functional recovery for children with conservatively managed NBPP. However, early referral to multispecialty brachial plexus centers may optimize outcomes.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Many children with conservatively managed neonatal brachial plexus palsy have good long-term shoulder and elbow outcomes. Early referral to multidisciplinary clinics may maximize long-term shoulder and elbow recovery and optimize outcomes.

Impact of Timing of Primary Nerve Surgery on Shoulder, Forearm, and Elbow Recovery in Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) almost universally affects movement at the shoulder, elbow, and forearm. Timing of nerve reconstruction surgery to optimize long-term outcomes remains unknown. This study aimed to determine if timing of nerve reconstruction affects long-term recovery of an active range of motion (AROM) at the shoulder, elbow, and forearm in NBPP.

METHODS

We interrogated a prospectively collected database of all patients with NBPP who underwent primary nerve surgery at a single tertiary referral center between 2005 and 2020. The cohort was divided into those who underwent surgery at ≤6 or >6 months old and ≤9 or >9 months old. AROM for shoulder abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation, elbow flexion and extension, and forearm supination were collected at each visit.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine children were included in the analysis; 28 underwent surgery at ≤6 months old, 71 at >6 months, 74 at ≤9 months, and 25 at >9 months. There was no difference in AROM at 5 years for any of the movements between the ≤6- and >6-month groups. The ≤9-month group had significantly better shoulder forward flexion and elbow extension AROM than the >9-month group at a 5-year follow-up and better forearm supination at up to a 15-year follow-up. Patients who presented earlier were more likely to have earlier operations.

CONCLUSION

Surgery before 9 months may improve long-term upper extremity recovery in NBPP. Early referral should be encouraged to optimize timing of operative intervention.

Effectiveness of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and muscle energy technique (MET) on post-operative elbow stiffness: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Stiffness is a common complication following trauma and surgeries around the elbow, which can result in upper limb functional disabilities. Soft tissue mobilization techniques such as Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) have limited evidence in elbow rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare their effects on postoperative elbow stiffness.

METHODOLOGY

26 subjects were recruited (13 each group) with postoperative elbow stiffness (minimum 6 weeks post surgery) and randomly allocated in two groups: IASTM and MET. Pain [Numeric Pain Rating Scale NPRS)], ROM (Goniometer), and Function [Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)] were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

RESULTS

The data of 26 subjects were analyzed and both groups significantly improved in outcome scores post-intervention. The improvements in ROM and function between groups were comparable, but NPRS and PSFS showed greater improvement in the IASTM group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IASTM and MET were both effective in improving outcomes in postoperative elbow stiffness. IASTM was more effective in improving pain and patient-specific function.

Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Post-traumatic Elbow Stiffness

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) may substantially affect the patient's functional range of motion and quality of life. Open elbow release has been extensively studied, but arthroscopic techniques are limited, particularly in differentiating between post-traumatic and non-traumatic stiffness. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes after arthroscopic release of PTES regarding the range of motion (ROM), pain, functional assessment, and complications.

METHODS

A prospective cohort was conducted on adult patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis for PTES, with 32 patients included in the final analysis. The ROM was measured using the orthopedic goniometer. Grip strength was measured using the Camry digital hand dynamometer (Camry, CA, USA) and compared to their contralateral side. The functional status of the patients was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)andthe Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI). All measurements were done before surgery and at the last follow-up visit. Pre-operative and post-operative changes in MEPI, ASES, and visual analog (VAS) scores were compared with the paired t-test.

RESULTS

After surgery, the ROM significantly improved from 74 ± 11 to 110 ± 15 degrees (p<0.001). Additionally, the ASES score and MEPI index both significantly improved from 69 ± 3.4 to 79 ± 6.3 and from 64 ± 5.7 to 82 ± 8, respectively (p<0.001). VAS scores also significantly improved from 1.1 ± 0.87 to 0.31 ± 0.53 at rest (p<0.001). The complication rate was 12%, including three transient ulnar nerve paresthesia and one superficial infection. Post-traumatic elbow release was more offered in distal humerus fractures (53%), followed by proximal ulna fracture/dislocations (25%).

CONCLUSION

We believe that arthroscopic arthrolysis is a safe and reliable treatment of PTES, which improves joint visibility and reduces pain. Patients can be counseled regarding the risk of a secondary surgery following distal humerus or proximal ulna fractures, including the expected recovery and complication rate.

Elbow Evaluation Via Telephone and Video Visit

Background Elbow conditions and pathology are commonly seen in the outpatient clinic. Telephone and video visits can allow for expeditious assessment of elbow complaints, without the added challenges of commuting for a clinic-based evaluation. In the setting of a pandemic, the benefits of telemedicine are apparent, but the time and effort saved from being able to remotely evaluate musculoskeletal conditions are also useful in a non-pandemic situation. In this modern era of telemedicine, protocols need to be developed to provide guidance for a remote elbow evaluation. As with all musculoskeletal conditions, the history about the elbow complaint allows the clinician to develop a differential diagnosis, which is either supported or refuted based on physical examination and diagnostic studies. Appropriate questions asked over a telephone call can provide answers that lead the clinician to a specific diagnosis and treatment plan. Furthermore, responses to these same questions can be further supported by a video assessment of the affected elbow, which may provide additional evidence to support a diagnosis and plan of care. Aims To outline possible questions, responses, and video examination techniques to aid the clinician in elbow examinations conducted via telemedicine. Methods We have created a pathway for step-by-step evaluation to help physicians direct their patients through the typical elements of a thorough elbow examination via telehealth. Results We have created tables of questions, answers, and instructions to help guide the physician through different aspects of a telehealth elbow examination. We have also included a glossary of descriptive images that demonstrate each maneuver.  Conclusion This article provides a structured guide to efficiently extracting clinically relevant information during telemedicine examinations of the elbow.

The efficacy of graded motor imagery in post-traumatic stiffness of elbow: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy improves the movement range after the onset of post-traumatic elbow stiffness and reduces the pain, which is a factor limiting elbow range of motion. However, no results have been reported for motor-cognitive intervention programs in post-traumatic elbow stiffness management. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of graded motor imagery (GMI) in post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

Fifty patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness (18 female; mean age, 41.9 ± 10.9 years) were divided into 2 groups. The GMI group (n = 25) received a program consisting of left-right discrimination, motor imagery, and mirror therapy (twice a week for 6 weeks); the structured exercise (SE) group (n = 25) received a program consisting of range-of-motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises (twice a week for 6 weeks). Both groups received a 6-week home exercise program. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were the active range of motion (AROM), visual analog scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), muscle strength of elbow flexors and extensors, grip strength, left-right discrimination, and Global Rating of Change. Patients were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment (12 sessions), and a 6-week follow-up.

RESULTS

The results indicated that both GMI and SE interventions significantly improved outcomes (P < .05). After a 6-week intervention, the DASH score was significantly improved with a medium effect size in the GMI group compared with the SE group, and improvement continued at the 6-week follow-up (F_1,45 = 3.10, P = .01). The results with a medium to large effect size were also significant for elbow flexion AROM (P = .02), elbow extension AROM (P = .03), VAS-activity (P = .001), TSK (P = .01), and muscle strength of elbow flexors and elbow extensors (P = .03) in favor of the GMI group.

CONCLUSION

The GMI is an effective motor-cognitive intervention program that might be applied to the rehabilitation of post-traumatic elbow stiffness to improve function, elbow AROM, pain, fear of movement-related pain, and muscle strength.

A modified-delphi study establishing consensus in the therapeutic management of posttrauamtic elbow stiffness

STUDY DESIGN

Web-based modified Delphi study.

BACKGROUND

Therapy is widely considered the first choice of treatment for posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow since loss of motion is a common sequela following traumatic elbow injuries. There is high variability in practice patterns for the management of the posttraumtic elbow.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to identify the current therapeutic management of posttraumatic elbow stiffness using expert consensus.

METHODS

This study surveyed experts using a web-based 3 round modified Delphi method. Quantitative data and comments were collected during the first round. Questions with Likert scaling were used to identify consensus (defined as 75% agreement) with each statement and comment boxes enabled open-ended responses to gather expert opinion. Lack of consensus and data from comments guided the second-round of the survey. This process was repeated after Round 2 to develop the Round 3 survey. Consensus was achieved at Round 3 and no further rounds were needed.

RESULTS

Round 1 included 34 experts (response rate 20%), not all experts were able to continue through all rounds. Round 2 included 18 experts and Round 3 included 15 experts. Survey items were categorized as follows: examination procedures, therapeutic interventions, orthotic intervention considerations, contributing patient factors, and clinical decisions and rehabilitation challenges. Twenty-five percent of items achieved consensus after Round 1, 30% after Round 2 and 52% after Round 3. Although most participants agreed that orthotic intervention is critical to patient outcomes, there were conflicting thoughts about the orthotic design and wearing schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this web-based modified Delphi study helped to establish a current body of knowledge using expert consensus to guide practice and identify specific questions that can be studied in future clinical studies on posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

Comparative study of the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis with or without external fixation for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

To evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of combined medial-lateral approach open arthrolysis with and without hinged external fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with severe elbow stiffness who were treated in our institution from January 2018 to January 2019. All of them were treated with combined medial-lateral approach arthrolysis. There were 20 patients who had the hinged external fixation placed and 29 patients without the placement of the external fixation. Their baseline characteristics and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 28.4 ± 3.7 months. There were no significant differences in the ROM of the elbow, MEPS, VAS, DASH, or complications between the two groups. The operation time and treatment cost of the patients without external fixation were significantly lower than patients with external fixation.

CONCLUSION

Combined medial-lateral approach open elbow arthrolysis without external fixation is a safe and effective way to treat elbow stiffness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Mobilizing orthoses in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: A survey of Australian hand therapy practice

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed-methods survey.

INTRODUCTION

Elbow stiffness and contractures often develop after trauma. There is a lack of evidence on mobilizing orthoses and the factors guiding orthotic prescription.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

To investigate hand therapists' orthotic preferences for varying extension and flexion deficits, and describe the factors affecting orthotic choice for post-traumatic elbow contractures.

METHODS

103 members responded to the electronic survey via the Australian Hand Therapy Association mailing list. Five post-surgical scenarios were used to gather information regarding orthotic preferences, reasons and orthotic protocol: (1) week 8 with 55° extension deficit; (2) week 12 with 30° extension deficit; (3) week 12 with 55° extension deficit; (4) week 8 with flexion limited to 100°; (5) week 12 with limited flexion.

RESULTS

Most responders (89.9%) used mobilizing orthoses, predominantly for extension (88.5%). Orthotic preferences for scenarios 1 to 5 were (1) serial static (78.3%); (2) custom-made three-point static progressive (38.8%); (3) custom-made turnbuckle static progressive (33.8%); (4) "no orthosis" (27.9%); and (5) custom-made hinged (27.1%) and nonhinged (27.1%) dynamic. Choices were based on "effectiveness," "ease for patients to apply and wear," and "ease of fabrication/previous experience/comfortable with design." The recommended daily dosage for extension was 6 to 12 hour.

DISCUSSION

This is the first known study that reflects on the use of mobilizing orthoses in post-traumatic elbows in Australia.

CONCLUSIONS

Mobilizing orthoses are used routinely for post-traumatic elbows in Australia. Extension deficits are managed with serial static and static progressive orthoses at weeks 8 and 12, respectively. Research is needed to assess whether orthotic intervention before 12 weeks is beneficial in reducing contractures.

The use of static progressive and serial static orthoses in the management of elbow contractures after complex fracture dislocation injuries: A pediatric case study

INTRODUCTION

Contractures are the most common complication after traumatic injury to the elbow. Although evidence supporting the use of static progressive and serial static orthoses to help recover range of motion after these complex injuries is growing, there is currently a paucity of literature exploring its efficacy in pediatric populations.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The following case study presents the results of the use of static progressive and serial static orthoses with a young patient who presented with both elbow extension and flexion contractures after a complex fracture dislocation injury.

RESULTS

A noted and consistent improvement in both elbow extension and flexion can be observed after commencement of the static progressive and serial static orthoses. These results are consistent with the literature exploring the efficacy of these orthoses with adult populations with traumatic elbow injuries.

DISCUSSION

Further studies evaluating the use of static progressive and serial static orthoses in the management of elbow contractures after traumatic injuries in pediatric populations is needed to establish best practices with this particular patient population.

Primary open elbow arthrolysis in post-traumatic elbow stiffness - A comparison of outcomes in severity of elbow injury

PURPOSE

Stiffness is a sequelae of elbow trauma. Arthrolysis may be considered to increase range of movement (ROM). Little is published on the outcomes/complications of elbow arthrolysis. We present our series of primary open arthrolysis in posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients that underwent primary open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness in our unit (2011-2018) were analysed. All procedures were performed by an elbow surgeon. Postoperative rehabilitation followed protocol with early motion; continuous passive motion (CPM) was utilised if requested. Data collected included patient demographics, traumatic injury type, arthrolysis technique, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elbow ROM, complications and postoperative Oxford Elbow Score (OES).

RESULTS

41 patients were included. 59% were male. Mean age at time of arthrolysis was 43 years (range 12-79 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 53 months (range 8-100 months). Median duration from time of injury to arthrolysis was 11 months (range 2-553 months). Mean preoperative flexion-extension arc (FEA) was 70°, improving to 104° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean preoperative pronosupination arc (PSA) was 125°, improving to 165° postoperatively (p < 0.001). Mean postoperative OES was 37 (n = 28). Complication rate was 24% with 7 recurrence requiring surgery, 2 nerve injuries and 1 infection. CPM, 10 patients, saw mean FEA improvement of 56°. Mean PSA improvement was 36°. Complication rate for these patients was 40%. Severe traumatic injury was associated with increased preoperative stiffness (FEA 61° vs 84°, PSA 111° vs 149°) but larger improvements in ROM (postoperative FEA 98° [p < 0.001], PSA 165° [p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

This series demonstrates improvement in elbow ROM following open arthrolysis with significantly higher gain in pronosupination for those withsevere injury. Moderate results were seen in a patient reported outcome measure. Patients considering arthrolysis should be counselled regarding expectations/complication rate.

A Comparison of Contracture Severity at Acute Discharge in Patients With and Without Heterotopic Ossification: A Burn Model System National Database Study

This study assesses the association between heterotopic ossification and upper extremity contracture by comparing goniometric measured active range of motion outcomes of patients with and without heterotopic ossification. Data were obtained from the Burn Model System National Database between 1994 and 2003 for patients more than 18 years with elbow contracture at acute discharge. Absolute losses in elbow range of motion were compared for those with and without radiologic evidence of heterotopic ossification (location undefined) and were further examined by burn size subgroups using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Differences in elbow range of motion were estimated using regression models, adjusted for demographic and clinical variables. Loss of range of motion of shoulder, wrist, forearm, and hand were also compared. From 407 instances of elbow contracture, the subjects with heterotopic ossification were found to have greater median absolute loss of elbow flexion among all survivors (median 50° [IQR 45°] vs 20° [30°], P < .0001), for the 20 to 40% total body surface area burn subgroup (70° [20°] vs 20° [30°], P = .0008) and for the >40% subgroup (50° [45°] vs 30° [32°], P = .03). The adjusted estimate of the mean difference in the absolute loss of elbow flexion between groups was 23.5° (SE ±7.2°, P = .0013). This study adds to our understanding of the potential effect of heterotopic ossification on upper extremity joint range of motion, demonstrating a significant association between the presence of heterotopic ossification and elbow flexion contracture severity. Further study is needed to determine the functional implications of heterotopic ossification and develop treatment protocols.

Effect of topical tranexamic acid on post-traumatic elbow stiffness in patients treated with open arthrolysis: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Elbow joint open arthrolysis is an effective method to release contracted tissue and débride heterotopic ossification in cases of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Recurrence remains one of the most common concerns for surgeons. Soft tissue contracture may result from intra- and/or extra-articular bleeding, edema, effusion, and granulation. The increasing incidence of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding has caused uncertainty about surgical outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is effective for reducing surgery-related bleeding and effusions in total hip or knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether topical TXA can decrease blood loss and effusions in patients treated with elbow joint open arthrolysis and whether it affects final function.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A prospective comparative study was conducted. Sixty-one patients with joint stiffness were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: one consisting of 31 patients treated with topical TXA intraoperatively after open arthrolysis (experimental group) and the other consisting of 30 patients who received saline administration (control group). The operation time, tourniquet time, and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. Drainage volume, elbow rotation, elbow motion arc, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and operation-related complications were followed up and recorded, whereas hematoma volume remaining in the joint space after drainage tube removal was assessed on ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Tourniquet time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage were significantly lower in the TXA group than in the control group. However, no significant intergroup differences were found in the incidence of related complications and final function evaluated at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Topical TXA improves surgical quality by controlling intraoperative bleeding, decreases the amount of blood loss soon after surgery, and could become a routine procedure in elbow joint open arthrolysis.

Multiple rare causes of post-traumatic elbow stiffness in an adolescent patient: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Joint stiffness after elbow surgery is not a rare complication, and is always accompanied by deformity. The causes of joint stiffness are multiple in different patients, and divided into intrinsic and extrinsic causes. Herein, we report an unusual case of posttraumatic elbow stiffness due to multiple and rare causes.

CASE SUMMARY

A 19-year-old male was hospitalized with the loss of motion of the left elbow for over ten years. Left limb computed tomography revealed left elbow stiffness with bony block and connection. The patient underwent surgery, and the etiology of joint stiffness was found to be a rare combination of common and uncommon causes. During an 18-mo follow-up period, the patient’s left elbow had normal motion and he was symptom-free.

CONCLUSION

However, this case combined with multiple and rare causes highlights that the patient with scar physique is likely to be accompanied with more severe soft tissue, nerve contracture, and heterotypic ossification, even during recurrence.

Result of modified Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure for elbow flexion contractures in brachial plexus birth injury

We report the results of ten consecutive patients who had correction of an elbow flexion contracture of greater than 30° in brachial plexus birth injury using a modified Outerbridge-Kashiwagi procedure. All patients had minimum 23-month follow-up. Pre- and post-operative elbow range of motion and DASH scores were recorded in all patients. The operative technique for the procedure and post-operative course is discussed. Surgery was supplemented by botulinum toxin injection into the biceps brachii muscle in most cases. The average age at surgery was 14 years 10 months. The initial plexus lesion was global in eight patients and upper in two. Pre-operative flexion contractures averaged 51° (range 35 to 60) and post-operative averaged 21° (range 15 to 30). Of these patients, one had no change in active flexion, four had loss of active flexion, and five had gain of active flexion. All ten patients were satisfied with their results and stated that they would recommend the procedure to other patients. Level of evidence: IV.

Prevalence and etiology of elbow flexion contractures in brachial plexus birth injury: A scoping review

PURPOSE

To synthesize the evidence on the prevalence and etiology of elbow flexion contractures secondary to brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI).

METHODS

Using Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched, followed by a comprehensive grey literature search. Articles and abstracts of studies of all level of evidence on the prevalence, natural history, clinical presentation, etiology, and treatment of elbow flexion contractures in BPBI were included.

RESULTS

Of the 884 records found, 130 full text articles were reviewed, and 57 records were included. The median prevalence of elbow flexion contracture in BPBI was 48%. The magnitude of the contractures was between 5 and 90 degrees. Contractures > 30 degrees were found in 21% to 36% of children. With recent clinical and lab studies, there is stronger evidence that the contractures are largely due to the effects of denervation causing failure in the growth of the affected flexor muscles, while muscle imbalance, splint positioning, and postural preferences play a smaller role.

CONCLUSION

The etiology of elbow flexion contractures is multifaceted. The contribution of growth impairment in the affected muscles offers greater understanding as to why maintaining passive range of motion in these contractures can be difficult.

Surgical Management of the Posttraumatic Stiff Elbow: A Step-Wise Algorithm for Open Osteocapsular Release

Posttraumatic elbow stiffness is common with the primary indication for contracture release being limited motion that affects functional activities which has not adequately improved after intensive therapy and rehabilitation. Preoperative evaluation focuses on the history of previous nonoperative and/or operative treatment, physical exam with particular attention paid to the status of the ulnar nerve, and imaging consisting of radiographs and computed tomography. There are multiple intrinsic and extrinsic causes of posttraumatic contracture. In general, limitation of motion in one direction can be attributed to a mechanical block and/or opposing contracture or tightness. Open elbow contracture release has been shown to improve motion, patient health status and disability scores with the specific surgical approach based upon the contracture pathology and surgeon preference. A step-wise algorithm is presented for open osteocapsular release. An anterior and posterior release is performed first through a lateral approach with the addition of a medial approach if ulnar nerve dysfunction exists or inadequate release has been obtained from the lateral approach. A previous posterior incision can be utilized by raising full thickness flaps. After release, gentle manipulation is performed and intraoperative stability is assessed with stress testing under fluoroscopy. Postoperatively, pain is managed with an in-dwelling nerve catheter and rehabilitation commences immediately. Significant improvement in range of motion can be expected with adequate surgical release and postoperative rehabilitation.

Effects of muscle energy technique on pain, range of motion and function in patients with post-surgical elbow stiffness: A randomized controlled trial

Background:

Elbow is a very functional joint. Elbow stiffness is a significant cause of disability hampering the function of the upper extremity as a whole. Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) are relatively pain-free techniques used in clinical practice for restricted range of motion (ROM).

Objective:

To study the effects of MET on pain, ROM and function given early in the rehabilitation in post-surgical elbow stiffness.

Methods:

An RCT was conducted on 30 patients post elbow fracture fixation. Group 1 was given MET immediately post removal of immobilization while Group 2 received MET 1 week later along with the rehabilitation protocol. Pain (Visual Analogue Scale), ROM (goniometry) and function (Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) were assessed pre and post 3 weeks.

Results:

Group 1 showed greater improvement than Group 2, mean flexion and extension change between groups being 11.7±2.8, 95%CI(5.9,17.4) and 8.5±2.0, 95%CI(4.4,12.7), respectively. VAS and DASH scores improved better in Group 1, mean change being 1.2±0.2, 95%CI(0.6,1.8) and 18.2±2.2, 95%CI(13.5,22.8) for VAS and DASH scores, respectively.

Conclusion:

MET can be used as an adjunct to the rehabilitation protocol to treat elbow stiffness and can be given safely in the early stages of post elbow fracture rehabilitation managed surgically with open reduction and rigid internal fixation.

Therapeutic Management of the Posttraumatic Stiff Elbow After Open Osteocapsular Release

Arthrofibrosis is an inevitable consequence of elbow trauma that oftentimes requires surgical release to restore range of motion and function. Although the surgical procedure for elbow osteocapsular release can result in marked improvement in elbow motion, postrelease rehabilitation is paramount to maintaining and even improving the gains achieved in surgery. There are a variety of rehabilitation protocols and modalities that can be implemented that can be divided into an early versus late stage of rehabilitation after surgery. Irrespectively, patient ownership in the rehabilitative process and effective communication between surgeon and therapist are integral in achieving successful outcomes.

An Orthopaedic Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation Method of the Forearm in Virtual Reality Physiotherapy

The use of robotic rehabilitation in orthopaedics has been briefly explored. Despite its possible advantages, the use of computer-assisted physiotherapy of patients with musculoskeletal injuries has received little attention. In this paper, we detailed the development and evaluation of a robotic-assisted rehabilitation system as a new methodology of assisted physiotherapy in orthopaedics. The proposal consists of an enhanced end-effector haptic interface mounted in a passive mechanism for allowing patients to perform upper-limb exercising and integrates virtual reality games conceived explicitly for assisting the treatment of the forearm after injuries at the wrist or elbow joints. The present methodology represents a new approach to assisted physiotherapy for strength and motion recovery of wrist pronation/supination and elbow flexion-extension movements. We design specific game scenarios enriched by proprioceptive and haptic force feedback in three training modes: passive, active, and assisted exercising. The system allows the therapist to tailor the difficulty level on the observed motion capacity of the patients and the kinesiology measurements provided by the system itself. We evaluated the system through the analysis of the muscular activity of two healthy subjects, showing that the system can assign significant working loads during typical physiotherapy treatment profiles. Subsequently, a group of ten patients undergoing manual orthopaedic rehabilitation of the forearm tested the system, under similar conditions at variable intensities. Patients tolerated changes in difficulty through the tests, and they expressed a favourable opinion of the system through the administered questionnaires, which indicates that the system was well accepted and that the proposed methodology was feasible for the case study for subsequently controlled trials. Finally, a predictive model of the performance score in the form of a linear combination of kinesiology observations was implemented in function of difficult training parameters, as a way of systematically individualising the training during the therapy, for subsequent studies.

The timing of open surgical release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness is effective in restoring elbow function, but there is no guideline on the optimal time point of surgical release so far. The purpose of this article was to summarize the current available literature reporting on the timing of open release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched with a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Manual searches for references were performed to find potential relevant studies. Two authors separately extracted data from all the articles selected.

RESULTS

27 articles published between 1989 and 2017 were included with an overall enrollment of 836 patients. We divided all included studies into 3 groups according to the timing of surgical release: group 1 (6-10 months after injury), group 2 (11-20 months after injury), and group 3(>20 months after injury). The mean postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and recurrence rate were similar among the 3 groups; however, the mean gain in arc of motion in group 1 was the highest with the lowest complication rate among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

There was a trend toward a shorter waiting time from injury to open arthrolysis from 12 months to 6 months. The shorter waiting period of 6 to 10 months yielded better results. Therefore, early surgical release of stiff elbows is recommended for a shorter rehabilitation time and earlier return to work.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

Static Progressive Orthoses for Elbow Contracture: A Systematic Review

Background

As one of the most common musculoskeletal complications following trauma, elbow contracture is a frequent source of disabled daily activities. Conventional interventions are inadequate to provide favorable outcome. The static progressive orthoses are getting popular in the treatment of this problem.

Objective

The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of static progressive orthoses for elbow contracture.

Methods

Literatures when written in English published during 1 January 1997 and 31 January 2017 were searched in the following databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EBSCOhost. Articles are quality-assessed by two assessors, each article was summarized in evidence tables, and a narrative synthesis was also performed.

Results

Ten clinical trials were included. The study design and outcome measures used varied. Significant immediate improvement in the range of motion was reported by all studies, and those effects were still significant at follow-up. No significant difference was shown between static progressive and dynamic orthoses for elbow contracture in one randomized control trial.

Conclusions

Current low-quality evidence suggested that static progressive orthoses provided assistance for elbow contracture through improving range of motion. Further research is recommended using high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Application of distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator in complete open release for severe elbow stiffness

BACKGROUND

Radical release for severe stiff elbows may lead to instability. Hinged external fixation is used to treat unstable elbows. We hypothesized that extensive open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator would have good performance and low complications rate in treating severe elbow stiffness. Thus, the efficacy and security of this technique were assessed in this study.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 38 post-traumatic elbows with severe stiffness that underwent arthrolysis between February 2011 and February 2014. All patients were assessed as having elbow instability after complete arthrolysis. Ligament repair was combined with implantation of a hinged external fixator (fixed to the humerus and distal radius) to maintain elbow stability. Flexion arc, forearm rotation, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, elbow stability, and radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 31 months. Significant improvement was noted in flexion-extension arc (from 27° to 126°), forearm rotation (from 148° to 153°), and mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (from 68 points to 96 points). Mean pronation arc decreased from 66° preoperatively to 6° at 1.5 months of follow-up and showed a transient reduction during first 6 months postoperatively. Pin-related infection occurred in 2 patients, which was cured with conservative treatment. Two patients had moderate instability after removal of the fixator and regained stability at the 12-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, complications included ulnar nerve paralysis in 3, recurrence of heterotopic ossification in 1, and moderate pain in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete open release combined with a distal radius-positioned hinged external fixator is an effective treatment for severe stiff elbows. This technique had a low complication rate.

Effectiveness of rosiglitazone in reducing flexion contracture in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis with surgical capsular release: A biomechanical, histological, and genetic analysis

AIMS

Animal models have been developed that allow simulation of post-traumatic joint contracture. One such model involves contracture-forming surgery followed by surgical capsular release. This model allows testing of antifibrotic agents, such as rosiglitazone.

METHODS

A total of 20 rabbits underwent contracture-forming surgery. Eight weeks later, the animals underwent a surgical capsular release. Ten animals received rosiglitazone (intramuscular initially, then orally). The animals were sacrificed following 16 weeks of free cage mobilisation. The joints were tested biomechanically, and the posterior capsule was assessed histologically and via genetic microarray analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in post-traumatic contracture between the rosiglitazone and control groups (33° (standard deviation (sd) 11) vs 37° (sd14), respectively; p = 0.4). There was no difference in number or percentage of myofibroblasts. Importantly, there were ten genes and 17 pathways that were significantly modulated by rosiglitazone in the posterior capsule.

DISCUSSION

Rosiglitazone significantly altered the genetic expression of the posterior capsular tissue in a rabbit model, with ten genes and 17 pathways demonstrating significant modulation. However, there was no significant effect on biomechanical or histological properties.Cite this article: M. P. Abdel. Effectiveness of rosiglitazone in reducing flexion contracture in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis with surgical capsular release: A biomechanical, histological, and genetic analysis. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:11-17. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000593.

Static progressive versus dynamic splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review of 232 patients

INTRODUCTION

The elbow is prone to stiffness after trauma. To regain functional elbow motion, several conservative and surgical treatment options are available. Nonoperative treatment includes physical therapy, intra-articular injections with corticosteroids, and a static progressive or dynamic splinting program. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive review of the literature to evaluate the best current evidence for nonoperative treatment options for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We performed a search of all studies on nonoperative treatment for elbow stiffness in human adults. All articles describing nonoperative treatment of elbow stiffness, written in the English, German, French or Dutch language, including human adult patients and with the functional outcome reported were included in this study.

RESULTS

Eight studies (including 232 patients) met our eligibility criteria and were included for data analysis and pooling. These studies included one randomized controlled trial and seven retrospective cohort studies. Static progressive splinting was evaluated in 160 patients. The average pre-splinting range of motion of all elbows was 72°, which improved by 36° after splinting to an average post-splinting arc of motion of 108°. Dynamic splinting was evaluated in 72 patients with an average pre-splinting range of motion of 63°. The average improvement was 37° to an average post-splinting arc of motion of 100°.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dynamic orthoses and static progressive splinting show good results for the treatment of elbow stiffness, regardless of etiology. The choice for one treatment over the other is based on the preference of the surgeon and patient. We recommend to continue nonoperative treatment with dynamic or static bracing for 12 months or until patients stop making progression in range of elbow motion.

The effect of simulated elbow contracture on temporal and distance gait parameters

BACKGROUND

Elbow contractures can be functionally debilitating. Extensive research has been published on treatments to restore elbow motion, but few have discussed clinical implications beyond the affected extremity. Reciprocal arm swing in normal gait has been shown to increase stability and reduce energy expenditure. The importance of arm swing has been clinically demonstrated in patients with cerebral palsy, stroke and Parkinson's disease. We hypothesized that elbow contractures would result in an abnormal spatio-temporal gait parameters.

METHODS

Forty volunteer subjects walked on the Gaitmat II which provided real-time analysis of temporal and distance gait parameters. Five conditions were tested: no brace (control 1), elbow brace unlocked (control 2) and brace locked in 30°, 90° or 120° flexion (simulating fixed elbow contractures). Condition order was randomized for each subject. Each condition consisted of five walking trials.

RESULTS

All three fixed elbow conditions (120°, 90° and 30°) demonstrated significantly decreased gait velocity (1.37, 1.39 and 1.39m/s) and stride length (1.45, 1.46 and 1.46m) compared to the control condition (1.42m/s and 1.48m, respectively). Single limb stance and double support times were decreased and increased, respectively, compared to control. There was no significant difference in cadence or limb asymmetry in the three fixed elbow conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite well-established functional limitations in elbow contracture patients and importance of arm swing in normal gait, the impact of elbow contractures on gait is unknown. This study demonstrates that simulated elbow contracture results in significant differences in spatio-temporal gait parameters suggesting that elbow contractures have a broader functional impact beyond the affected extremity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Intrawound application of vancomycin reduces wound infection after open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

With the improvements in wound healing through the use of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics and technical refinements, postoperative elbow infections have become less common but still occur in certain elective elbow surgeries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic application of vancomycin into the operative site to reduce the incidence of infection after the open release of post-traumatic stiff elbows.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 272 such patients during a 4-year period was performed. In the control group (93 patients), simple prophylaxis with standard intravenous antibiotics was performed; in the vancomycin group (179 patients), vancomycin powder was applied directly into the wound before closure along with standard intravenous prophylaxis.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of at least 6 months, the control group was found to have 6 infections (6.45%; confidence interval: 2.40%-13.52%) compared with none (0%; confidence interval: 0-2%.04%) in the vancomycin group, which was a statistically significant difference (P = .0027). No adverse effects were documented from the direct use of the vancomycin powder.

CONCLUSIONS

The local application of vancomycin powder may be a promising means of preventing postoperative elbow infections after elbow release in patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness.

Effect of skin resection on the improvement of joint contractures in rats

The effect of skin resection on joint contracture was determined by comparing the first measurement of range of motion after cast removal and the second measurement after the skin resection. This study aimed to verify that both the joint movement during the measurement and skin affect range of motion. [Subjects] Twelve female Wistar rats were used. [Methods] The right hind limb ankle of each rat was immobilized in complete plantar flexion in a cast. In the resection group (n = 6), the skin of the right hind limb ankle was removed surgically, but not in the non-resection group (n = 6). In the resection group, the first measurement of the dorsiflexion angle was obtained after the cast was removed, and the second measurement was obtained after skin resection. In the non-resection group, both measurements of the dorsiflexion angle were obtained soon after the cast was removed. [Results] Compared with the non-resection group, the resection group showed a significant increase between the first and second measurements of range of motion. [Conclusion] These results show that range of motion is substantially affected by skin, in addition to joint movement, during measurement.

Surgical capsular release reduces flexion contracture in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis

Animal models of joint contracture may be used to elucidate the mechanisms of arthrofibrosis. Patients with joint contracture commonly undergo surgical capsular release. Previous animal models of joint contracture do not simulate this aspect of arthrofibrosis. We hypothesize that a surgical capsular release will decrease the severity of arthrofibrosis in this rabbit model. A capsular contracture was surgically created in 20 skeletally mature rabbits. Eight weeks later, ten rabbits underwent capsular release, which consisted of elevation of the posterior capsule through a lateral incision and manipulation under anesthesia. Ten rabbits had a sham incision, without release (control group). Immediately after release or sham surgery, extension loss (calculated by subtracting the knee extension angle (degrees) of the operative limb from the nonoperative, contralateral limb) was measured using fluoroscopy. All animals were sacrificed following 16 weeks of postoperative free cage activity. At sacrifice, joint contracture was measured using a custom, calibrated device. The histology of the posterior joint capsule was assessed at sacrifice. All animals survived both operations without complications. Immediately after surgical release or sham surgery, the average extension loss was 129.2 ± 10.7° in the control group versus 29.6 ± 8.2° in the capsular release group (p = 0.0002). Following 16 weeks of remobilization, the average extension loss of the control and capsular release animals were 49.0 ± 12.7° and 36.5 ± 14.2°, respectively (p = 0.035). There were no histological differences between the two groups. In this animal model, a surgical capsular release decreased the extension loss (flexion contracture) immediately after surgery, as well as following sixteen weeks of remobilization. There were no histological changes detected in the posterior joint capsule.

A study to compare two goniometric methods for measuring active pronation and supination range of motion

Introduction

Movement of the forearm allows positioning the hand during several functional activities of daily living. Assessing range of motion of supination and pronation is essential for clinical identification of functional limitations, although many methods can be used. Confounding values can be found due to different techniques used by therapists. The purpose of this study was to compare two standard goniometric methods for measuring active range of motion of forearm pronation and supination, aiming to define its reliability and ease of use.

Methods

The study included 33 individuals, 13 injured and 20 non-injured volunteers. We analyzed two standard goniometric methods for measuring pronation and supination. For the first method, the volunteers had to hold a pencil as a guide for the movable arm of the goniometer and for the second method the movable arm was in contact with the distal dorsal surface of the wrist near the ulna head, and the hand was free. Two trained examiners performed the evaluations. Intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement of Bland and Altman were used to analyze the data.

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for both groups and movements at inter-rater and inter-methods comparison. Bland and Altman plots showed that, although excellent reliability, some data dispersion was present.

Conclusion

These data suggest that both methods could be used in clinical practice with excellent reliability. The goniometric method with the movable arm placed in contact with the distal dorsal surface of the wrist near the ulna head might be easier to perform and useful in cases where finger prehension is absent or weak, which would prevent the use of a pencil as reference.

Distraction arthrolysis of posttraumatic elbow stiffness with a hinged external fixator

The treatment of elbow stiffness remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. A hinged external fixator with distraction ability has recently emerged as a new option in the surgical treatment of elbow stiffness. Between January 2007 and December 2009, twenty-five posttraumatic stiff elbows (mean patient age, 29.2 years) received distraction arthrolysis from 1 surgeon group (W.J.W., L.H., P.Z.J.) at the authors' institution. For patients with only periarticular soft tissue contracture (grade 1), close mechanical distraction was performed with the assistance of an external fixator under anesthesia; open arthrolysis was avoided as much as possible. For patients who also had heterotopic ossification (grade 2), it was removed through a limited approach before the external fixator was applied. For patients with osteoarticular surface damage or destruction (grade 3), osteoarticular integrity was restored before arthrolysis. Range of motion increased markedly, from 33.4° (range, 0°-75°) preoperatively to 105.6° (range, 80°-140°) immediately postoperatively (Student's t test, P<.05). Of the 25 patients, 23 were followed for a mean of 16 months. No serious complications occurred. Mean range of motion was 97.4° (range, 70°-130°) at final follow-up, a significant increase from preoperatively (Student's t test, P<.05). No significant loss of range of motion was found at final follow-up compared with intraoperative values (average 8.2° loss; Student's t test, P>.05). This study suggests that a hinged external distraction fixator is a less invasive option for treating posttraumatic elbow stiffness and prevents contracture recurrence after arthrolysis.

Management of severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow by open arthrolysis and a monolateral hinged external fixator

Arthrolysis and dynamic splinting have been used in the treatment of elbow contractures, but there is no standardised protocol for treatment of severe contractures with an arc of flexion < 30 degrees . We present our results of radical arthrolysis with twin incisions with the use of a monolateral hinged fixator to treat very severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow. This retrospective study included 26 patients (15 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 30 years (12 to 60). The mean duration of stiffness was 9.1 months (5.4 to 18) with mean follow-up of 5.2 years (3.5 to 9.4). The mean pre-operative arc of movement was 15.6 degrees (0 degrees to 30 degrees ), with mean pre-operative flexion of 64.1 degrees (30 degrees to 120 degrees ) and mean pre-operative extension of 52.1 degrees (10 degrees to 90 degrees ). Post-operatively the mean arc improved to 102.4 degrees (60 degrees to 135 degrees ), the mean flexion improved to 119.1 degrees (90 degrees to 140 degrees ) and mean extension improved to 16.8 degrees (0 degrees to 30 degrees ) (p < 0.001). The Mayo elbow score improved from a mean of 45 (30 to 65) to 89 (75 to 100) points, and 13 had excellent, nine had good, three had fair and one had a poor result. We had one case of severe instability and one wound dehiscence which responded well to treatment. One case had deep infection with poor results which responded well to treatment. Our findings indicate that this method is very effective in the treatment of severe elbow contracture; however, a randomised controlled study is necessary for further evaluation.

Serial casting and splinting of elbow contractures in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE

Elbow flexion contractures are a common sequela in obstetric brachial plexus palsy. The etiology and best management of these contractures is unclear. Nonsurgical treatment involving serial casting and splinting is supported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of serial casting and splinting of elbow flexion contractures in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy who participated in serial casting and splinting for an elbow flexion contracture was conducted. Elbow extension passive range of motion measurements at initial, best-achieved, and final outcome were compared.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients, aged 2 to 16 years, were studied. Elbow passive range of motion improved from initial to best-achieved and final outcome measurements. Fifty-three percent of patients were noncompliant between the time of best-achieved and final outcome. Loss of passive range of motion during the noncompliant period was statistically significant. Compliant patients had better treatment results. A clinical decision tree for elbow contractures in obstetric brachial plexus palsy was formulated.

CONCLUSIONS

Serial casting and splinting of elbow contractures in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy is effective. Successful maintenance of treatment effects is dependent on patient age and compliance.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Static progressive versus three-point elbow extension splinting: a mathematical analysis

Elbow joint contractures are often treated by using static progressive, dynamic, turnbuckle, or serial static splinting. These splint designs are effective in regaining functional elbow range of motion due to the high forces applied to the contracted tissues; however, regaining terminal elbow extension remains a challenge. Static progressive splints are commonly used to initiate treatment, however, are considered less effective in regaining terminal extension. Recently, the concept of converting a static progressive splint into a three-point static progressive splint (TPSPS) to regain terminal extension has been introduced. This paper mathematically analyzes the compressive and rotational forces in static progressive and TPSPSs. Our hypothesis was that three-point static progressive splinting was superior to the standard static progressive elbow extension splint in applying rotational forces to the elbow at terminal extension.

Continuous passive motion after tenolysis in hand therapy patients: a retrospective study

Continuous passive motion (CPM) is a common adjunct to the postoperative therapy program. Use of CPM has been advocated for a variety of diagnoses in hand rehabilitation. This retrospective study compares two groups of patients who underwent digital tenolysis (and/or capsulectomy) and evaluates the use of CPM in their postoperative therapeutic management. Both groups had initial injuries of fractures, tendon lacerations, and/or crush injuries resulting in surgical intervention. After therapeutic rehabilitation, the patients failed to gain satisfactory active ROM and elected to proceed with a secondary surgical procedure. Fifteen patients (19 digits) who used CPM machines in addition to their home exercise program were compared to 21 patients (24 digits) who did not use CPM. Primary outcome comparisons for this study were change in total active motion (TAM) over time (preoperative to discharge from therapy), duration of therapy, and total number of therapy visits. There was no significant difference (F=1.16, p=0.29) in the change in TAM for patients using CPM (39.89 degrees ) compared to those not using CPM treatment (31.83 degrees ). Furthermore, CPM users were seen for significantly more therapy sessions than non-CPM users (25.7 therapy visits compared to 18.54 therapy visits). Rehabilitation lasted approximately the same amount of weeks for both groups (CPM users 10.21 weeks vs. non-CPM users 11.42 weeks).

The posttraumatic stiff elbow: a review of the literature

Loss of motion is a common complication of elbow trauma. Restoration of joint motion in the posttraumatic stiff elbow can be a difficult, time-consuming, and costly challenge. In this review of the literature, the biologic response to trauma and the possible etiologic events that may lead to fibrosis of the capsules and heterotopic ossification will be discussed, as well as nonsurgical and surgical management of stiffness and expected outcomes of treatment.