Integrating Genetic and Genomic Testing Into Oncology Practice

Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk

As demand for genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) continues to increase, so does the sense of urgency to scale up efforts to triage patients, facilitate informed consent, and order genetic testing for cancer risk. The National Society of Genetic Counselors outlines the elements of informed consent that should be addressed in a GCRA session. While this practice resource aims to improve health equity, research on how well the elements of informed consent are implemented in practice is lacking. This retrospective and prospective mixed-methods study assessed how adequately the elements of informed consent are addressed during pre-test GCRA among 307 community clinicians (CC) and 129 cancer genetic counselors (GC), and barriers they face to addressing these elements. Results revealed that more than 90% of both cohorts consistently addressed components of at least 5 of the 10 elements of informed consent during a pre-test consultation. Technical aspects and accuracy of the test and utilization of test results were the most similarly addressed elements. Notably, GCs more often review the purpose of the test and who to test, general information about the gene(s), and economic considerations whereas CCs more often review alternatives to testing. Both cohorts reported psychosocial aspects of the informed consent process as the least adequately addressed element. Time constraints and patient-related concerns were most often cited by both cohorts as barriers to optimal facilitation of informed consent. Additional barriers reported by CCs included provider lack of awareness, experience, or education, and availability of resources and institutional support. Findings from this study may contribute to the development of alternative delivery models that incorporate supplementary educational tools to enhance patient understanding about the utility of genetic testing, while helping to mitigate the barrier of time constraints. Equally important is the use of this information to develop continuing education tools for providers.

Pacific Biosciences Fusion and Long Isoform Pipeline for Cancer Transcriptome-Based Resolution of Isoform Complexity

Genomic profiling using short-read sequencing has utility in detecting disease-associated variation in both DNA and RNA. However, given the frequent occurrence of structural variation in cancer, molecular profiling using long-read sequencing improves the resolution of such events. For example, the Pacific Biosciences long-read RNA-sequencing (Iso-Seq) transcriptome protocol provides full-length isoform characterization, discernment of allelic phasing, and isoform discovery, and identifies expressed fusion partners. The Pacific Biosciences Fusion and Long Isoform Pipeline (PB_FLIP) incorporates a suite of RNA-sequencing software analysis tools and scripts to identify expressed fusion partners and isoforms. In addition, sequencing of a commercial reference (Spike-In RNA Variants) with known isoform complexity was performed and demonstrated high recall of the Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP workflow to benchmark our protocol and analysis performance. This study describes the utility of Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP analysis in improving deconvolution of complex structural variants and isoform detection within an institutional pediatric and adolescent/young adult translational cancer research cohort. The exemplar case studies demonstrate that Iso-Seq and PB_FLIP discover novel expressed fusion partners, resolve complex intragenic alterations, and discriminate between allele-specific expression profiles.

Ordering and Interpreting Precision Oncology Studies for Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Primer

BACKGROUND

The promise of precision oncology can only be realized when genetic alterations are identified that can be leveraged to improve response and minimize toxicity. Identifying those alterations requires the knowledge to order the right test and to interpret the results correctly. This primer is designed to help clinicians order the appropriate testing for patients with specific malignancies and to give them an informed approach to interpretation.

OBSERVATIONS

Germline DNA is usually acquired from peripheral blood, buccal swab, or saliva collection in patients with a metastatic malignancy and can provide treatment options otherwise not available. However, germline testing does not indicate alterations that arise solely in tumor tissue. Somatic testing may be performed on primary tumor, metastatic biopsy, or circulating tumor DNA when the alteration is present at the time that the tumor developed and expected to be carried through the evolution of the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid growth in technology and ability to enhance understanding of relevant tumor biology continues to improve the therapeutic landscape for individuals dealing with malignancy as does our ability to find targetable genetic alterations with the potential for meaningful clinical benefit.

Contemporary Molecular Analyses of Malignant Tumors for Precision Treatment and the Implication in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

New molecular tests and methods, in addition to morphology-based diagnosis, are widely used as a new standard of care in many tumors. “One-size-fits-all medicine” is now shifting to precision medicine. This review is intended to discuss the key steps toward to development of precision medicine and its implication in oral squamous cell carcinoma. The challenges and opportunities of precision medicine in oral cancer will be sequentially discussed based on the four steps of precision medicine: identification/detection, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring.

Therapeutic strategies in METex14 skipping mutated non-small cell lung cancer

METex14 skipping mutations occur in about 3–4% of lung adenocarcinoma patients and 1–2% of patients with other lung cancer histology. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are established oncogenic drivers of NSCLC. A mutation that results in loss of exon 14 in the MET gene leads to dysregulation and inappropriate signaling that is associated with increased responsiveness to MET TKIs. Results from GEOMETRY mono-1 and VISION Phase I/II clinical trials demonstrated significant clinical activity in patients treated with the MET Exon 14 skipping mutation inhibitors capmatinib and tepotinib with tolerable toxicity profile. In the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial, capmatinib was especially active in treatment-naïve patients supporting the upfront testing of this oncogenic driver. Tepotinib demonstrated superior activity in the pretreated patients in the VISION trial. Savolitinib is another MET TKI that has shown efficacy in the first- and second-line settings, including patients with aggressive pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. These studies have demonstrated that these TKIs can cross the blood brain barrier and demonstrated some activity toward CNS metastases. MET Exon 14 skipping mutation is detected by NGS-based testing of liquid or tissue biopsies, with preference for RNA-based NGS. The activity of capmatinib and tepotinib is limited by the development of acquired resistance. Current research is focused on strategies to overcome resistance and improve the effectiveness of these agents. Our aim is to review the current status of MET Exon 14 skipping mutation as it pertains NSCLC.

The Future of Parallel Tumor and Germline Genetic Testing: Is There a Role for All Patients With Cancer?

Under the traditional paradigm of genetic testing in cancer, the role of germline testing was to assess for the inherited risk of cancer, whereas the role of tumor testing was to determine therapeutic selection. Parallel tumor-normal genetic testing uses simultaneous genetic testing of the tumor and normal tissue to identify mutations and allows their classification as either germline or somatic. The increasing adoption of parallel testing has revealed a greater number of germline findings in patients who otherwise would not have met clinical criteria for testing. This result has widespread implications for the screening and further testing of at-risk relatives and for gene discovery. It has also revealed the importance of germline testing in therapeutic actionability. Herein, we describe the pros and cons of tumor-only versus parallel tumor-normal testing and summarize the data on the prevalence of incidental actionable germline findings. Because germline testing in patients with cancer continues to expand, it is imperative that systems be in place for the proper interpretation, dissemination, and counseling for patients and at-risk relatives. We also review new therapeutic approvals with germline indications and highlight the increasing importance of germline testing in selecting therapies. Because recommendations for universal genetic testing are increasing in multiple cancer types and the number of approved therapies with germline indications is also increasing, a gradual transition toward parallel tumor-normal genetic testing in all patients with cancer is foreseeable.